Clinical Activity and Safety of Anlotinib Combined with PD-1 Blockades for Patients with Previously Treated Small Cell Lung Cancer

Combination therapy using low-dose anlotinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

Background

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose anlotinib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors as second-line or later treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

Methods

The study included 42 patients with ES-SCLC who were treated with low-dose anlotinib combined with programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitors at Henan Cancer Hospital between March 2019 and August 2022. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety data for these patients. Indicators assessed included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the overall response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Prognostic factors were identified in univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Median PFS was 11.0 months (95% CI: 7.868-14.132) and median OS was 17.3 months (95% CI: 11.517-23.083). The ORR was 28.5% and the DCR was 95.2%. Treatment-related AEs were noted in 27 patients (64.3%), the most common of which was thyroid dysfunction (26.2%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were observed in two patients (4.8%).

Conclusions

A combination of low-dose anlotinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors as second-line or later treatment for ES-SCLC may achieve longer PFS and OS and have manageable AEs.

Feasibility and Tolerability of Anlotinib Plus PD-1 Inhibitors for Previously-Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Exploratory Study

Objective

Anlotinib demonstrated encouraging therapeutic activity as third-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors also exhibited promising and durable response against previously-treated advanced NSCLC. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors for previously-treated NSCLC in clinical practice.

Methods

This retrospective study included 56 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with systemic treatment previously. Patients included were treated with anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors in clinical practice. Therapeutic outcomes of the patients were evaluated radiologically using target lesions, and the prognostic outcomes were generated by follow-up. Adverse reactions experienced throughout the treatment were documented and analyzed.

Results

Between August 2018 and November 2022, 56 patients with advanced NSCLC were eligible to participate in this study consecutively. Therapeutic outcomes resulted in an overall response rate of 28.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 17.3%-42.2%] and a disease control rate of 91.1% (95% CI: 80.4%-97.0%). Furthermore, this combination regimen among the 56 patients yielded a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.81-8.19) and a median overall survival (OS) of 15.8 months (95% CI: 10.23-21.37), respectively. And the median duration of response (DoR) among patients who responded was 8.3 months (95% CI: 4.38-12.22). Additionally, adverse reactions of all grades throughout the treatment were observed in 50 patients (89.3%), and adverse reactions of grade ≥3 were detected in 23 patients (41.1%). Fatigue, hypertension, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting were the most common adverse reactions. Association analysis between PFS and baseline characteristic subgroups indicated that ECOG score and number of metastatic lesions might be potential predictors of PFS in the exploratory analysis.

Conclusion

Anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and encouraging therapeutic activity as subsequent-line therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. This conclusion should be confirmed in prospective large-scale clinical trials subsequently.

Anlotinib plus oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 in refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SALTER TRIAL): a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have few treatment options and dismal overall survival (OS) after failed platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

The eligibility criteria of this phase II clinical trial included patients with measurable disease, age of 18 to 75 years, a confirmed diagnosis of disease progression or recurrence after prior platinum-based chemotherapy with a pathologically proven diagnosis of SCLC. Patients were treated with anlotinib at a dosage of 12 mg once daily (QD) and S-1 at 60 mg twice daily (BID) for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week treatment-free interval. After six cycles of the above treatment, patients continued the maintenance therapy using S-1 monotherapy at 60 mg/ BID for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week treatment-free interval until disease progression.

RESULTS

From March 2019 to June 2020, a total of 71 patients were initially assessed for eligibility in this study. Out of these, 52 patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled, and 48 patients received at least two doses of the study drug. The median follow-up time was 25.1 months. The ORR was seen in 21 patients (43.8%). The median PFS was 4.5 months (95% CI, 3.5-5.5 months), and the median OS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.6-7.3 months). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (16.7%), anemia (14.6%), neutropenia (14.6%), and hypertension (10.4%). No treatment-related death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of anlotinib with oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 demonstrated notable activity in relapsed or refractory SCLC, showing a favorable ORR and an acceptable, manageable safety profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT03823118) on 3 January 2019.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib monotherapy or anlotinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitor for advanced small cell lung cancer with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib, as a salvage treatment for patients after failure of third-line or later-line treatments for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), has shown efficacy in patients with brain metastases (BMs). However, the efficacy and safety of anlotinib alone or in combination with immunotherapy for SCLC with BMs remain unclear.

METHOD

Patients treated with anlotinib alone or in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between April 2019 and February 2023 were identified. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe the progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial PFS (iPFS). A waterfall diagram was used to indicate changes in intracranial lesions.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients were included; 29 received anlotinib alone, and 19 were administered anlotinib plus ICI. Combination therapy, compared with anlotinib, was associated with significantly longer PFS and iPFS (PFS: 8.1 months vs. 2.5 months, P < 0.001; iPFS: 8.1 months vs. 2.5 months, P = 0.004). Similar results were observed in patients with multiple BMs (PFS: 8.1 months vs. 1.9 months, P = 0.001; iPFS: 8.1 months vs. 1.9 months, P = 0.002). After third-line or later-line treatments, patients treated with ICI plus anlotinib also achieved significant PFS and iPFS benefits (PFS: 8.4 months vs. 2.1 months, P < 0.001; iPFS: 9.2 months vs. 2.1 months, P = 0.002). No new or severe adverse events were observed with combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

The combination of anlotinib and ICI has promising intracranial and extracranial efficacy with tolerable toxicity, and may be a therapeutic option for SCLC patients with BMs.

Feasibility and Tolerability of Anlotinib Plus PD-1 Blockades for Patients with Treatment-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Exploratory Study

Objective

Therapeutic regimens are relatively scarce among patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to determine the feasibility and tolerability of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic CRC retrospectively.

Methods

A total of 68 patients with previously treated metastatic CRC who received anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades in clinical practice were included in this study retrospectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, therapeutic outcomes and safety profile during administration were collected and briefly analyzed. All subjects were followed up regularly. Therapeutic outcomes, including drug response and prognosis, were presented, and a safety profile was depicted to illustrate the adverse reactions.

Results

A total of 68 patients with treatment-refractory metastatic CRC who received anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades in clinical practice were included in the final analysis. Best therapeutic response during treatment indicated that partial response was observed in 11 patients, stable disease was noted in 41 patients, and progressive disease was found in 16 patients, producing an objective response rate of 16.2% (95% CI: 8.4%-27.1%) and a disease control rate of 76.5% (95% CI: 64.6%-85.9%). Prognostic analysis suggested that the median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 68 patients was 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.01-7.59), and the median overall survival (OS) was 12.5 months (95% CI: 9.40-15.60). Of the 11 patients who responded, the median duration of response was 6.7 months (95% CI: 2.89-10.53). Safety profile during treatment showed that patients experienced adverse reactions regardless of grade, and grade ≥3 adverse reactions were found in 61 patients (89.7%) and 41 patients (60.3%), respectively. Common adverse reactions were hypertension, myelosuppression (including leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia), fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome.

Conclusion

Anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades demonstrated encouraging efficacy and acceptable safety profile in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic CRC preliminarily in clinical practice. This conclusion should be confirmed in prospective clinical trials.

A Retrospective Study of Anlotinib Combined with Anti-PD-1 Inhibitors in the 2nd or Later-Line Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitors in the 2nd or later-line treatment of advanced solid tumors.

Patients and Methods

A total of 63 patients with advanced solid tumors who had failed or could not endure the adverse reactions after receiving first-line or more systematic treatment in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from March 2019 to April 2023 were treated with anlotinib Hydrochloride capsule combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitors. The efficacy and adverse reactions were evaluated according to RECIST1.1 and NCICTC4.0 standards.

Results

The percentage of overall response rate of 63 patients during the combination administration indicated that complete response was 1.6% (n=1), partial response was 23.8% (n=15), stable disease was 39.7% (n=25) and progressive disease was 34.9% (n=22), yielding objective response rate (ORR) of 25.4% and disease control rate (DCR) of 65.1%. Furthermore, the median PFS of 63 patients with advanced solid tumors was 7 months and the median OS was not reached, and the median follow-up time is 4.5 months. In subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in PFS between first-line, second-line, third-line and above (p=0.631); there was no significant difference in PFS between PD-1 positive patients and PD-1 negative patients (p=0.094); there was no significant difference in PFS between patients who had previously used anti-PD-1 inhibitors and patients who had not used before (p=0.204). The most common adverse reactions were hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and fatigue, with an incidence of 28.4% (18/63), 25.6% (14/63), and 25.6% (14/63), respectively. Most of the adverse reactions were grade 1-2, and there were no grade 4 adverse reactions.

Conclusion

Anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated promising efficacy and tolerable safety for patients with advanced solid tumors in the 2nd or later-line treatment.

Treatment-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with angiogenesis inhibitors have been used to treat advanced lung cancer. Their associated treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) are currently considered acceptable; however, no conclusion has been reached. We aimed to summarize the trAEs caused by ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors in patients with advanced lung cancer.

METHODS

Pulled studies met the following criteria: patients with advanced lung cancer who received treatment involving ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors (with or without chemotherapy) in interventional or observational studies. Results included the type and number of trAEs or immune-related adverse events (irAEs), treatment-associated discontinuation and mortality, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

PROSPERO

CRD42022337656.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 32 trials involving 2313 patients who had 7768 any-grade trAEs and 1078 grade ≥3 trAEs. The pooled incidences were 87.33% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.49-93.65; I2 = 94.04%) for any-grade trAEs, and 38.63% (95% CI: 28.28-49.50; I2 = 95.61%) for grade ≥3 trAEs. There were 132 kinds of any-grade trAEs involving 18 systems, and 99 kinds of grade ≥3 trAEs involving 16 systems. For all trAEs, we observed significant differences in the line of therapy, trial design, therapy combination, and types of angiogenesis inhibitors (all P < 0.05). The rate of trAEs increased with dosage and frequency of medication. Pooled incidences of discontinuation and mortality were 10.64% and 0.81%, respectively. Nearly 647 patients experienced irAEs, including 636 any-grade irAEs and 154 grade ≥3 irAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the incidence of trAEs caused by ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors is generally acceptable. These trAEs have a wide spectrum nearly covering the full range of adverse events. Grade ≥3 trAEs are more closely associated with angiogenesis inhibitors than any grade. However, treatment-associated mortality remains concerning.

Investigation of the efficacy and feasibility of combined therapy of PD-L1-enhanced exogenous peripatetic adoptive natural killer (NK) cells in combination with antiangiogenic targeted therapy in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

A 67-year-old male patient presented with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer with the primary lesion located in the right upper lung, accompanied by multiple metastases to the pleura and abdominal cavity with enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. A combination therapy approach was used to target the patient's multiple systemic metastases after localized radiotherapy. The approach involved adoptive transfer of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) enhanced exogenous natural killer (NK) cells, along with antiangiogenic treatment. Allogeneic cord blood NK cells were infused back into the patient over two consecutive days. On the first day, the treatment was followed by a dose of 1200 mg of atezolizumab. Subsequently, the patient received a daily dose of 10 mg of anlotinib administered orally for 14 days. This was followed by a 7-day break, and each cycle lasted 21 days. After delivering localized radiation to the primary lesion in the right lung and metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes, complete remission was achieved in the local lesion, effectively avoiding the risk of superior vena cava syndrome. Following six cycles of combined therapy, most of the metastatic lesions had disappeared, and the remaining metastatic lesions had significantly reduced in size. The recent therapeutic effect resulted in partial remission. The combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitor PD-L1-enhanced exogenous adoptive transfer NK cells, along with antiangiogenic targeted treatment, demonstrated a satisfactory short-term effect, with disappearance of most of the metastases and noticeable shrinkage in the remaining metastatic lesions.

Feasibility and Tolerability of Lenvatinib, Plus PD-1 Blockades for Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Exploratory Study

Objective

Lenvatinib was the standard first-line therapy for patients with unresectable HCC. PD-1 blockades demonstrated promising efficacy for patients with previously-treated HCC. Therefore, this study was to investigate the feasibility and tolerability of lenvatinib plus PD-1 blockades for patients with unresectable HCC retrospectively.

Methods

A total of 37 patients with unresectable HCC who received lenvatinib plus PD-1 blockades in first-line setting were included in this study retrospectively. Efficacy of the patients was evaluated with the change of target lesion using mRECIST criteria per investigator and all the subjects were followed up regularly. Adverse reactions were collected and documented. Exploratory analysis between prognosis and baseline characteristics was performed using log rank test and multivariate analysis were performed using Cox regression analysis.

Results

The best overall response of the 37 patients suggested that complete response was observed in one patient, partial response was noted in 11 patients, stable disease was noted in 16 patients and 9 patients had progressive disease, which yielded an objective response rate (ORR) of 32.4% (95%CI: 18.0–49.8) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 75.7% (95%CI: 58.8–88.2). Furthermore, the median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 37 patients with advanced HCC was 8.3 months (95%CI: 3.34–13.26). And the median overall survival (OS) was 17.8 months (95%CI: 7.19–28.41). In addition, the median duration of response (DoR) in 12 patients with response was 9.6 months (95%CI: 3.03–16.17). Furthermore, adverse reactions that were attributed to the combination administration were detected in 36 patients (97.3%), among whom a total of 22 patients (59.5%) were observed of the grade ≥3 adverse reactions. And the most common adverse reactions were hypertension, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and hepatotoxicity.

Conclusion

Lenvatinib plus PD-1 blockades demonstrated promising anticancer activity and acceptable toxicity for patients with unresectable HCC. And the conclusion should be validated in prospective clinical trials subsequently.

Effectiveness and Tolerability of Anlotinib Plus PD-1 Inhibitors for Patients with Previously Treated Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

Objective

This study was to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors for patients with previously treated metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Methods

Patients with previously treated metastatic STS who were administered with anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors in clinical practice were included for analysis retrospectively. All the common subtypes of advanced STS were appropriate for analysis. Efficacy of the regimen was assessed according to the change of target lesion radiologically, and all the patients were followed up regularly. Safety profile during the combination administration was recorded and documented specifically. Clinical significance according to different STS subtypes was analyzed accordingly.

Results

From September 2018 to January 2022, a total of 32 patients with previously treated metastatic STS who received anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades were screened for the analysis in this study. The best overall response during the combination administration indicated that partial response was observed in 11 patients, stable disease was noted in 16 patients and progressive disease was found in 6 patients, yielding an objective response rate (ORR) of 34.4% (95% CI: 18.6–53.2%) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 84.4% (95% CI: 67.2–94.7%). Furthermore, the median PFS of 32 patients with metastatic STS was 7.6 months (95% CI: 3.31–11.89) and the median OS was 14.9 months (95% CI: 8.36–21.44). Besides, adverse reactions related to the treatment during anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors administration were observed in 29 patients (90.6%), of whom, a total of 13 patients (40.6%) were deemed as grade 3–4 adverse reactions and no grade 5 adverse reaction was found. Specifically, the most common adverse reactions were fatigue, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea and dermal toxicity.

Conclusion

Anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated durable and promising efficacy and tolerable safety for patients with metastatic STS in real world. Further prospective clinical trials were warranted to validate the feasibility of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades clinically.

Feasibility and Tolerance of Apatinib plus PD-1 Inhibitors for Previously Treated Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Real-World Exploratory Study

Background

Apatinib is established to be the standard of care as third-line therapy for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer (GC). Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockades also exhibited promising efficacy and safety for patients with treatment-refractory advanced GC.

Objective

This study was to explore the feasibility and tolerance of apatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors for patients with previously treated advanced GC.

Methods

This study was performed as a real-world study; patients with advanced GC who were treated with previous systemic chemotherapy were screened retrospectively. Eligible patients were administered with apatinib combined with PD-1 blockade treatment. Efficacy of the patients was assessed with the change of target lesion using radiological evidence according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, and follow-up was carried out regularly. A safety profile was collected and documented during the combination treatment. Univariate analysis based on baseline characteristic subgroup was implemented in univariate analysis to identify the potential factor that might contribute to progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Between August 2018 and October 2021, a total of 39 patients with advanced GC or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma participated in this study consecutively and all the patients were available for efficacy and safety assessment. The best overall response during apatinib plus PD-1 blockade administration exhibited that PR was observed in 8 patients, SD was noted in 19 patients, and PD was found in 12 patients, which yielded an ORR of 20.5% (95% CI: 9.3%-36.5%), and DCR was 69.2% (95% CI: 52.4%-83.0%). Furthermore, the relatively enough follow-up had resulted in the mature PFS and overall survival (OS) data, suggesting that the median PFS of the 39 patients with advanced GC was 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.74-5.06). Additionally, the median OS of the 39 patients with advanced GC was 7.8 months (95% CI: 4.82-10.78). Furthermore, the most common adverse reactions of the 39 patients who received apatinib plus PD-1 blockades treatment were fatigue (61.5%), nausea and vomiting (56.4%), diarrhea (48.7%), hypertension (46.2%), hand-foot syndrome (38.5%), and rash (28.2%). Furthermore, performance status was independently associated with PFS of apatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor combination administration in baseline characteristic subgroup analysis.

Conclusion

Apatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors exhibited promising effectiveness and acceptable tolerance for previously treated advanced GC preliminarily. And this conclusion should be confirmed in clinical trials in the future.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Combined with PD-1 Blockades for Patients with Previously Treated Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

This study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockades for patients with previously treated advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Patients and Methods

Present study was designed as a retrospective study, a total of 32 patients with advanced EOC who progressed after at least two lines previously available standard therapy were included in this study. All the patients were administered with anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockades administration. Clinical activity was implemented and analyzed, which was assessed according to the change of target lesion by imaging evidence and all the subjects were followed up regularly. Safety profile were collected and documented during the treatment. Univariate analysis was carried out using log rank test and multivariate analysis were adjusted by Cox regression analysis.

Results

The best overall response suggested that partial response was noted in 12 patients, stable disease was observed in 14 patients, progressive disease was found in 6 patients. Therefore, the objective response rate (ORR) of the 32 patients was 37.5% (95% CI: 21.1–56.3%), disease control rate (DCR) of the patients was 81.3% (95% CI: 63.6–92.8%). The median follow-up duration of this study was 17.5 months (follow-up range: 0.9–33.5 months). And the median PFS and OS of the 32-patient cohort was 6.8 months (95% CI: 2.64–10.96) and 18.5 months (95% CI: 14.08–22.92), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were fatigue (68.8%), nausea and vomiting (56.3%), hypertension (50.0%) and diarrhea (40.6%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis for PFS indicated that ECOG performance status and FIGO stage were independent factors to predict PFS of patients with previously treated EOC.

Conclusion

Anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockades demonstrated promising efficacy and tolerable safety profile for patients with previously treated advanced EOC preliminarily. The conclusion should be confirmed in more patients with advanced EOC subsequently.