Efficacy and safety of olanzapine/fluoxetine combination in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

An umbrella review of adverse effects associated with antipsychotic medications: the need for complementary study designs

Antipsychotic medications are widely prescribed in psychotic illnesses and other mental disorders. Effectiveness is well-established, particularly for reducing symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations, but can be impacted by tolerability. Adverse effects are wide-ranging, and vary between antipsychotics, which is clinically important. This umbrella review aimed to comprehensively summarise the extent and quality of evidence for adverse effects associated with antipsychotic use in people with mental disorders. We included 32 meta-analyses of randomised trials and observational studies. The overall robustness of reported associations was considered in terms of review quality, heterogeneity, excess significance bias, and prediction intervals. Using this approach, endocrine and metabolic, movement-related, and sedation and sleep problems were the clinical domains with strongest evidence. The overall quality of included meta-analyses was low, and individual adverse effects were not typically examined in meta-analyses of both randomised trials and observational study designs. Future reviews should focus on adhering to methodological guidelines, consider the complementary strengths of different study designs, and integrate clinically relevant information on absolute rates and severity of adverse effects.

Latin American consensus recommendations for the management and treatment of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD)

Despite the abundance of literature on treatment-resistant depression (TRD), there is no universally accepted definition of TRD, and available treatment pathways for the management of TRD vary across the Latin American region, highlighting the need for a uniform definition and treatment principles to optimize the management of TRD in Latin America.

METHODS

Following a thematic literature review and pre-meeting survey, a Latin America expert panel comprising 14 psychiatrists with clinical experience in managing patients with TRD convened and utilized the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method to develop consensus-based recommendations on the appropriate definition of TRD and principles for its management.

RESULTS

The expert panel agreed that 'treatment-resistant depression' (TRD) is defined as 'failure of two drug treatments of adequate doses, for 4-8 weeks duration with adequate adherence, during a major depressive episode'. A stepwise treatment approach should be employed for the management of TRD - treatment strategies can include maximizing dose, switching to a different class, and augmenting or combining treatments. Nonpharmacological treatments, such as electroconvulsive therapy, are also appropriate options for patients with TRD.

CONCLUSION

These consensus recommendations on the operational definition of TRD and approved treatments for its management can be adapted to local contexts in the Latin American countries but should not replace clinical judgement. Individual circumstances and benefit-risk balance should be carefully considered while determining the most appropriate treatment option for patients with TRD.

Association between the rs6313 polymorphism in the 5-HTR2A gene and the efficacy of antipsychotic drugs

BACKGROUND

Prescribing the optimal antipsychotic treatment to schizophrenia is very important as it is well established that patients have different sensitivity to the available antipsychotic drugs. The genotype of the HTR2A T102C (rs6313) polymorphism has been suggested to affect the efficacy of antipsychotic drugs, but the results of different studies have been inconsistent METHODS: In this study, a meta-analysis was used to ascertain the association between allele and genotype polymorphism of rs6313 and the efficacy of antipsychotic drugs. Related studies publicated from January 1995 to December 2021 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases. The correlations between allele and genotype polymorphism of rs6313 and the responder rate and scale score reduction rate of antipsychotics were analyzed. In addition, subgroup analyses were performed on time, drug, and ethnicity.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies were included. The meta-analysis showed that allele and genotype polymorphisms at the rs6313 locus overall were not associated with antipsychotic drug responder rate or scale score reduction rate. Ethnicity subgroup analysis showed that antipsychotic drugs were more effective in patients with allele T in the Caucasian population. Indian patients with the TT genotype had the lowest scale score reduction rate and poor drug treatment effect. East Asian patients with the TC genotype had better treatment effect, whereas in patients with the CC genotype, the treatment was less effective. Drug subgroup analysis showed that patients with the TC genotype treated with clozapine had the highest responder rate and score reduction rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between rs6313 polymorphism and the efficacy of antipsychotic drugs is mainly influenced by drug and ethnicity. Caucasian patients with the T allele respond better to drug therapy, and Asian patients with TC genotype. The TC genotype was also a good predictor of the efficacy of clozapine treatment.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmentation and combination treatments for early-stage treatment-resistant depression

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly burdensome health condition, for which there are numerous accepted pharmacological and psychological interventions. Adjunctive treatment (augmentation/combination) is recommended for the ~50% of MDD patients who do not adequately respond to first-line treatment. We aimed to evaluate the current evidence for concomitant approaches for people with early-stage treatment-resistant depression (TRD; defined below).

METHODS

We systematically searched Medline and Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science to identify randomised controlled trials of adjunctive treatment of ⩾10 adults with MDD who had not responded to ⩾1 adequate antidepressant. The cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool was used to assess study quality. Pre-post treatment meta-analyses were performed, allowing for comparison across heterogeneous study designs independent of comparator interventions.

RESULTS

In total, 115 trials investigating 48 treatments were synthesised. The mean intervention duration was 9 weeks (range 5 days to 18 months) with most studies assessed to have low (n = 57) or moderate (n = 51) RoB. The highest effect sizes (ESs) were from cognitive behavioural therapy (ES = 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-2.07), (es)ketamine (ES = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.23-1.73) and risperidone (ES = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.29-1.61). Only aripiprazole and lithium were examined in ⩾10 studies. Pill placebo (ES = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.98) had a not inconsiderable ES, and only six treatments' 95% CIs did not overlap with pill placebo's (aripiprazole, (es)ketamine, mirtazapine, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone). We report marked heterogeneity between studies for almost all analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support cautious optimism for several augmentation strategies; although considering the high prevalence of TRD, evidence remains inadequate for each treatment option.

Cost-effectiveness of esketamine nasal spray compared to intravenous ketamine for patients with treatment-resistant depression in the US utilizing clinical trial efficacy and real-world effectiveness estimates

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of esketamine nasal spray relative to intravenous ketamine for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in the US.

METHODS

We used a Markov model with a 1-month cycle length, and we estimated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs (2020 USD), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of esketamine relative to ketamine over a 3-year time horizon, from both the healthcare sector and patient perspectives. We ran the model using efficacy estimates from both clinical trial and real-world effectiveness (RWE) data. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) were performed to evaluate the robustness of findings.

RESULTS

Over a 3-year time horizon, the use of esketamine yielded 1.98 QALYs (RWE/clinical trial efficacy), and the use of ketamine yielded 2.03 QALYs (clinical trial efficacy) or 1.99 QALYs (RWE). Esketamine was dominated by ketamine using the healthcare perspective. ICERs were above $150,000/QALY threshold with the patient perspective. Under the healthcare perspective, PSA showed there are no scenarios where esketamine was cost-effective compared to ketamine. With the patient's perspective, the probability that esketamine was cost-effective compared to ketamine was 0.0055 (clinical trial efficacy) and 0.35 (RWE).

LIMITATIONS

The data utilized for efficacy have limitations. The time horizon may fail to capture longer-term costs and benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

In this decision analytic model evaluating esketamine versus ketamine for TRD, we found esketamine unlikely to be cost-effective under a healthcare sector perspective. Under a patient perspective, esketamine had similar effectiveness and was less costly than ketamine due to insurance coverage.

Safety and effectiveness of intranasal esketamine for treatment-resistant depression: a real-world retrospective study

Aim: There is limited real-world evidence for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) receiving esketamine nasal spray. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data collected from a psychiatric clinic's EHR system. Results: A total of 171 TRD patients received esketamine July 2019-June 2021. This predominantly female, white population had several mental health comorbidities and high exposure to psychiatric medications. We observed significant reductions (p < 0.001) in average PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores from baseline (PHQ-9: mean: 16.7; SD: 5.8; GAD-7: mean: 12.0; SD: 5.8) to last available treatment (PHQ-9: mean: 12.0; SD: 6.4; GAD-7: mean: 8.7; SD: 5.6). There were no reports of serious adverse events. Conclusion: This study found a significant disease burden for patients with TRD. Esketamine appears to be well tolerated and effective in improving depression and anxiety.

Samidorphan/olanzapine combination therapy for schizophrenia: Efficacy, tolerance and adverse outcomes of regimen, evidence-based review of clinical trials

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

•

FDA approved a combination dose of olanzapine and samidorphan (OLZ/SAM) for treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder.

•

Overall, OLZ/SAM showed a significant reduction in symptoms for long-term treatment.

•

Major adverse events included nervous system disorders, blood, metabolic or nutritional changes.

Association between psychotropic prescriptions and the total amount of psychotropics ingested during an intentional overdose: A single-center retrospective study

Aim

To investigate the association between psychotropic prescriptions and the total amount of psychotropics ingested during a subsequent intentional overdose and to examine factors related to the number of psychotropic prescriptions.

Methods

The initial sample comprised 69 patients who were admitted to the emergency department of a general hospital in Japan following an intentional overdose via psychotropic medications. We performed retrospective hierarchical multiple regression analysis with the total amount of psychotropics ingested at the overdose as a dependent variable and factors related to deliberate self‐harm or overdose identified in previous studies as independent variables. We compared two models, one that did not (Step 1) and one that did (Step 2) include the number of different prescribed psychotropic medications as an independent variable in the analysis.

Results

Forty‐seven patients were eligible for the analysis. The number of different prescribed psychotropic medications was associated with the total amount of psychotropics ingested at the overdose in Step 2 (β = 0.40, P = .01). There was a trend toward an association between the past number of deliberate self‐harm events and the total amount of psychotropics ingested at the overdose in Step 1 (β = 0.30, P = .05), but this trend was weakened in Step 2 (β = 0.15, P = .33).

Conclusion

The number of different prescribed psychotropics appeared to influence the risk of subsequent intentional overdose through increasing the total amount of psychotropics ingested. Cumulative psychotropic prescriptions, particularly those delivered after deliberate self‐harm, might be indirectly related to this risk.

The number of different prescribed psychotropics appeared to influence the risk of subsequent intentional overdose through increasing the total amount of psychotropics ingested. Cumulative psychotropic prescriptions, particularly those delivered after deliberate self‐harm, might be indirectly related to this risk.

Pharmacological Augmentation in Unipolar Depression: A Guide to the Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological augmentation is a recommended strategy for patients with treatment-resistant depression. A range of guidelines provide advice on treatment selection, prescription, monitoring and discontinuation, but variation in the content and quality of guidelines may limit the provision of objective, evidence-based care. This is of importance given the side effect burden and poorer long-term outcomes associated with polypharmacy and treatment-resistant depression. This review provides a definitive overview of pharmacological augmentation recommendations by assessing the quality of guidelines for depression and comparing the recommendations made.

METHODS

A systematic literature search identified current treatment guidelines for depression published in English. Guidelines were quality assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. Data relating to the prescription of pharmacological augmenters were extracted from those developed with sufficient rigor, and the included recommendations compared.

RESULTS

Total of 1696 records were identified, 19 guidelines were assessed for quality, and 10 were included. Guidelines differed in their quality, the stage at which augmentation was recommended, the agents included, and the evidence base cited. Lithium and atypical antipsychotics were recommended by all 10, though the specific advice was not consistent. Of the 15 augmenters identified, no others were universally recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides a comprehensive overview of current pharmacological augmentation recommendations for major depression and will support clinicians in selecting appropriate treatment guidance. Although some variation can be accounted for by date of guideline publication, and limited evidence from clinical trials, there is a clear need for greater consistency across guidelines to ensure patients receive consistent evidence-based care.

Investigation of Clozapine and Olanzapine Reactive Metabolite Formation and Protein Binding by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Drug-induced toxicity has, in many cases, been linked to oxidative metabolism resulting in the formation of reactive metabolites and subsequent covalent binding to biomolecules. Two structurally related antipsychotic drugs, clozapine (CLZ) and olanzapine (OLZ), are known to form similar nitrenium ion reactive metabolites. CLZ-derived reactive metabolites have been linked to agranulocytosis and hepatotoxicity. We have studied the oxidative metabolism of CLZ and OLZ as well as two known metabolites of CLZ, desmethyl-CLZ (DCLZ), and CLZ-N-oxide (CLZ-NO), using in vitro rat liver microsomal (RLM) incubations with glutathione (GSH) trapping of reactive metabolites and liquid chromatography-high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS). Reactive metabolite binding to selected standard peptides and recombinant purified human proteins was also evaluated. Bottom-up proteomics was performed using two complementary proteases, prefractionation of peptides followed by LC-HRMS/MS for elucidating modifications of target proteins. Induced RLM was selected to form reactive metabolites enzymatically to assess the complex profile of reactive metabolite structures and their binding potential to standard human proteins. Multiple oxidative metabolites and several different GSH adducts were found for CLZ and OLZ. Modification sites were characterized on human glutathione S-transferase (hGST) alpha 1 (OLZ-modified at Cys112), hGST mu 2 (OLZ at Cys115), and hGST pi (CLZ, DCLZ, CLZ-NO and OLZ at Cys170), human microsomal GST 1 (hMGST1, CLZ and OLZ at Cys50), and human serum albumin (hSA, CLZ at Cys34). Furthermore, two modified rat proteins, microsomal GST 1 (CLZ and OLZ at Cys50) and one CYP (OLZ-modified, multiple possible isoforms), from RLM background were also characterized. In addition, direct effects of the reactive metabolite modifications on proteins were observed, including differences in protease cleavage specificity, chromatographic behavior, and charge-state distributions.

A preliminary study of resting brain metabolism in treatment-resistant depression before and after treatment with olanzapine-fluoxetine combination

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) occurs in many patients and causes high morbidity and mortality. Because TRD subjects are particularly difficult to study especially longitudinally, biological data remain very limited. In a preliminary study to judge feasibility and power, 25 TRD patients were referred from specialty psychiatric practices. All were severely and chronically depressed and mostly had comorbid psychiatric disorders as is typical in TRD. Nine patients were able to complete all required components of the protocol that included diagnostic interview; rating scales; clinical magnetic resonance imaging; medication washout; treatment with maximally tolerated olanzapine-fluoxetine combination for 8 weeks; and pre- and post-treatment fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. This drug combination is an accepted standard of treatment for TRD. Dropouts arose from worsening depression, insomnia, and anxiety. One patient remitted; three responded. A priori regions of interest included the amygdala and subgenual cingulate cortex (sgACC; Brodmann area BA25). Responders showed decreased metabolism with treatment in the right amygdala that correlated with clinical response; no significant changes in BA25; better response to treatment the higher the baseline BA25 metabolism; and decreased right ventromedial prefrontal metabolism (VMPFC; broader than BA25) with treatment which did not correlate with depression scores. The baseline metabolism of all individuals showed heterogeneous patterns when compared to a normative metabolic database. Although preliminary given the sample size, this study highlights several issues important for future work: marked dropout rate in this study design; need for large sample size for adequate power; baseline metabolic heterogeneity of TRD requiring careful subject characterization for future studies of interventions; relationship of amygdala activity decreases with response; and the relationship between baseline sgACC and VMPFC activity with response. Successful treatment of TRD with olanzapine-fluoxetine combination shows changes in cerebral metabolism like those seen in treatment-responsive major depression.

Prescribing for moderate or severe unipolar depression in patients under the long-term care of UK adult mental health services

BACKGROUND

A quality improvement programme addressing prescribing practice for depression was initiated by the Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health.

METHODS

A baseline clinical audit against evidence-based practice standards was conducted in UK adult mental health services.

RESULTS

A total of 55 mental health services submitted data for 2082 patients, under the care of a community psychiatric team (CMHT) for at least a year, with a diagnosis of moderate or severe unipolar depression, 54% of whom had a comorbid psychiatric diagnosis. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were prescribed for 35% of the patients, other newer generation antidepressants for 60%, tricyclic antidepressants for 6% and monoamine oxidase inhibitors for <1%. The most commonly prescribed individual antidepressants were mirtazapine (33%, usually in combination with another antidepressant), venlafaxine (25%) and sertraline (21%). Patients with severe depression were more likely (p < 0.001) to be co-prescribed an antipsychotic medication, lithium, or to have received electroconvulsive therapy. There was a documented clinical review in the last year in 85%, with a symptom rating scale used in 11%. A documented comprehensive treatment history was accessible for 50% of those prescribed antidepressant medication.

CONCLUSION

Patients with moderate or severe depression remaining under the care of a CMHT for longer than a year are clinically complex. The failure to achieve a level of wellness allowing discharge from mental health services may be partly related to the finding that not all patients had the benefit of a systematic approach to clinical assessment and sequential testing of available evidence-based pharmacological interventions.