Comparisons Between Infectious and Autoimmune Encephalitis: Clinical Signs, Biochemistry, Blood Counts, and Imaging Findings

Cancer Therapy-Induced Encephalitis

Encephalitis associated with cancer therapies is a rare but serious complication that can significantly impact patients' quality of life and it requires prompt identification and management. Over the past two decades, immunotherapy-particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors-has become a cornerstone of cancer treatment, with up to half of metastatic cancer patients in economically developed countries now receiving these therapies. The widespread adoption of immunotherapy has led to improved survival rates and long-term remissions, even in patients with advanced metastatic disease. However, as immune modulators, these therapies can trigger a range of immune-related adverse events, including a variety of novel neurological toxicities. Among these, encephalitis is of particular concern due to its potential severity, which can compromise treatment outcomes. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature on this condition, highlighting optimal diagnostic strategies and management approaches to mitigate the risk of significant morbidity, while also comparing encephalitis induced by immunotherapy with that caused by traditional chemotherapies and targeted oncologic treatments.

Association of α-HBDH levels with the severity and recurrence after acute ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVE

α-HBDH serves as a biomarker of myocardial damage and is implicated in adverse outcomes across various critical illnesses. Our study aimed to assess the correlation between α-HBDH levels, and severity and recurrence of acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

We enrolled patients with mild-to-moderate AIS within 72 h of onset. Based on the baseline score of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (bNIHSS) at registration, patients were categorized into mild (bNIHSS ≤ 4 points) and moderate AIS groups (4 < bNIHSS ≤ 10 points). Subsequently, based on the normal upper limit of α-HBDH, patients were divided into low-level α-HBDH (≤ 180 U/L) and high-level α-HBDH (> 180 U/L) groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were employed to evaluate the relationship between α-HBDH levels and bNIHSS scores as well as the risk of recurrent AIS within 90 days.

RESULTS

We observed a significant association between higher baseline levels of α-HBDH and increased bNIHSS scores, indicating a more severe AIS (odds ratio = 24.449; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.749-68.324; p < 0.01). Additionally, the risk of recurrent AIS within 90 days was 4.666 times higher in the high-level α-HBDH group compared to the low-level group (hazard ratio = 4.666; 95% CI, 2.481-8.777; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The baseline level of α-HBDH is significantly correlated with the severity of AIS and the risk of recurrent AIS within 90 days.

Autoimmune encephalitis: what the radiologist needs to know

Autoimmune encephalitis is a relatively novel nosological entity characterized by an immune-mediated damage of the central nervous system. While originally described as a paraneoplastic inflammatory phenomenon affecting limbic structures, numerous instances of non-paraneoplastic pathogenesis, as well as extra-limbic involvement, have been characterized. Given the wide spectrum of insidious clinical presentations ranging from cognitive impairment to psychiatric symptoms or seizures, it is crucial to raise awareness about this disease category. In fact, an early diagnosis can be dramatically beneficial for the prognosis both to achieve an early therapeutic intervention and to detect a potential underlying malignancy. In this scenario, the radiologist can be the first to pose the hypothesis of autoimmune encephalitis and refer the patient to a comprehensive diagnostic work-up - including clinical, serological, and neurophysiological assessments.In this article, we illustrate the main radiological characteristics of autoimmune encephalitis and its subtypes, including the typical limbic presentation, the features of extra-limbic involvement, and also peculiar imaging findings. In addition, we review the most relevant alternative diagnoses that should be considered, ranging from other encephalitides to neoplasms, vascular conditions, and post-seizure alterations. Finally, we discuss the most appropriate imaging diagnostic work-up, also proposing a suggested MRI protocol.

Clinical Features of Patients with Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease and Isolated Seizure Symptoms

Background

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated encephalitis is a new clinical phenotype of inflammatory demyelinating diseases. Some MOG antibody-positive patients with central nervous system demyelinating events present with isolated seizures. However, there are gaps in the epidemiological knowledge regarding seizures with MOG antibody-associated encephalitis in adults. This study characterized the clinical features and treatment of MOG antibody-positive patients with isolated seizures.

Methods

We reviewed all the patients admitted to Tianjin Huanhu Hospital between Jan. 1st 2017 and Jan. 1st 2022, to screen the MOG antibody-positive patients with isolated seizures, and collected the concerned patients' information regarding epidemiology, clinical presentations, laboratory and radiological characteristics, electroencephalogram (EEG), treatments, and prognoses.

Results

We collected six MOG antibody-positive adult patients who had isolated symptomatic seizures. The mean age of the patients was 33 years (range, 29-40 years), and five (83.3%) were men. All patients presented with motor seizures, five (83.3%) had cognitive dysfunction, and only one (16.7%) had status epilepticus. Five (83.3%) patients had a good response to immunotherapy and antiseizure medications; only one had a sequela. The cerebrospinal fluid or serum anti-MOG antibody test turned negative over time.

Discussion

The most common seizure type in patients with MOG antibody-associated encephalitis with isolated seizures was focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, and most patients had a good prognosis. Adding antiseizure medications were beneficial for MOG antibody-positive patients with seizures. Relapses and sequelae were associated with low-dose, short-time, or delayed therapy, and wide-range demyelinating brain damage.

Neurovirulent cytokines increase neuronal excitability in a model of coronavirus-induced neuroinflammation

BACKGROUND

Neurological manifestations of severe coronavirus infections, including SARS-CoV-2, are wide-ranging and may persist following virus clearance. Detailed understanding of the underlying changes in brain function may facilitate the identification of therapeutic targets. We directly tested how neocortical function is impacted by the specific panel of cytokines that occur in coronavirus brain infection. Using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique, we determined how the five cytokines (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12p40 and IL-15 for 22-28-h) at concentrations matched to those elicited by MHV-A59 coronavirus brain infection, affected neuronal function in cultured primary mouse neocortical neurons.

RESULTS

We evaluated how acute cytokine exposure affected neuronal excitability (propensity to fire action potentials), membrane properties, and action potential characteristics, as well as sensitivity to changes in extracellular calcium and magnesium (divalent) concentration. Neurovirulent cytokines increased spontaneous excitability and response to low divalent concentration by depolarizing the resting membrane potential and hyperpolarizing the action potential threshold. Evoked excitability was also enhanced by neurovirulent cytokines at physiological divalent concentrations. At low divalent concentrations, the change in evoked excitability was attenuated. One hour after cytokine removal, spontaneous excitability and hyperpolarization of the action potential threshold normalized but membrane depolarization and attenuated divalent-dependent excitability persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronavirus-associated cytokine exposure increases spontaneous excitability in neocortical neurons, and some of the changes persist after cytokine removal.

Clinical predictors of encephalitis in UK adults-A multi-centre prospective observational cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Encephalitis, brain inflammation and swelling, most often caused by an infection or the body's immune defences, can have devastating consequences, especially if diagnosed late. We looked for clinical predictors of different types of encephalitis to help clinicians consider earlier treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre prospective observational cohort study (ENCEPH-UK) of adults (> 16 years) with suspected encephalitis at 31 UK hospitals. We evaluated clinical features and investigated for infectious and autoimmune causes.

RESULTS

341 patients were enrolled between December 2012 and December 2015 and followed up for 12 months. 233 had encephalitis, of whom 65 (28%) had HSV, 38 (16%) had confirmed or probable autoimmune encephalitis, and 87 (37%) had no cause found. The median time from admission to 1st dose of aciclovir for those with HSV was 14 hours (IQR 5-50); time to 1st dose of immunosuppressant for the autoimmune group was 125 hours (IQR 45-250). Compared to non-HSV encephalitis, patients with HSV more often had fever, lower serum sodium and lacked a rash. Those with probable or confirmed autoimmune encephalitis were more likely to be female, have abnormal movements, normal serum sodium levels and a cerebrospinal fluid white cell count < 20 cells x106/L, but they were less likely to have a febrile illness.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiation of treatment for autoimmune encephalitis is delayed considerably compared with HSV encephalitis. Clinical features can help identify patients with autoimmune disease and could be used to initiate earlier presumptive therapy.

Approach to acute encephalitis in the intensive care unit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in the identification of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and the emergence of new causes of infectious encephalitis (IE). However, management of these patients remains challenging, with many requiring care in intensive care units. Here, we describe recent advances in the diagnosis and management of acute encephalitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in the identification of clinical presentations, neuroimaging biomarkers, and electroencephalogram patterns have enabled more rapid diagnosis of encephalitis. Newer modalities such as meningitis/encephalitis multiplex PCR panels, metagenomic next-generation sequencing, and phage display-based assays are being evaluated in an effort to improve detection of autoantibodies and pathogens. Specific advances in the treatment of AE include establishment of a systematic approach to first-line therapies and the development of newer second-line modalities. The role of immunomodulation and its applications in IE are actively being investigated. In the ICU, particular attention to status epilepticus, cerebral edema, and dysautonomia may improve outcomes.

SUMMARY

Substantial diagnostic delays still occur, with many cases left without an identified etiology. Antiviral therapies remain scarce, and optimal treatment regimens for AE still need to be clarified. Nevertheless, our understanding of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to encephalitis is rapidly evolving.

Evaluation of multiple consensus criteria for autoimmune encephalitis and temporal analysis of symptoms in a pediatric encephalitis cohort

Objective

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of current criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and the temporal onset of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NP) in a pediatric encephalitis cohort.

Background

Multiple criteria for AE have been developed, including the Graus and pediatric-focused Cellucci consensus criteria, and the Determining Etiology in Encephalitis (DEE) score for patients with encephalitis. Early identification and treatment of AE is crucial to improve outcomes, but this can be difficult given the frequent overlap of clinical presentation between AE and infectious encephalitis (IE).

Design/methods

A retrospective review was conducted of patients seen at our institution from 2000 to 2021 with a final diagnosis of AE or IE. These were narrowed through multiple exclusions to etiology-confirmed IE or antibody-positive/negative AE. Time of onset or results of all symptoms and diagnostics were recorded. Sensitivity and specificity of each criterion under various clinical scenarios were calculated over the first month after initial NP symptom onset.

Results

A total of 23 antibody-positive AE, 9 antibody-negative AE and 23 IE patients were included in final analysis. Under an idealized scenario with rapid initial diagnostic evaluations, the sensitivity for pediatric AE by day 28 after onset of NP symptoms approached 90% for both Cellucci and Graus criteria. Specificity within these 28 days was low without infectious testing results, increasing the greatest with rapid PCR testing and second with infectious antibody testing-reaching ~90% with both. A DEE score of 3 provided a specificity of 100% in identifying IE, but low sensitivity (29%). Symptoms were noted to cluster within several days of onset in IE, but in AE were spread out. Personality/behavioral change, speech change, affective disorder, and sleep disturbance were noted more often in AE, while fever, elevated C-reactive protein or CSF protein, and abnormal MRI-Brain occurred more often in IE.

Conclusion

In this study, we provide the first evaluation of the Cellucci criteria and the first validation of the DEE score in the differentiation of pediatric AE and IE. Further refinement of AE criteria is needed to improve early detection and treatment of pediatric AE.

Cytokines and chemokines profile in encephalitis patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Encephalitis is caused by autoimmune or infectious agents marked by brain inflammation. Investigations have reported altered concentrations of the cytokines in encephalitis. This study was conducted to determine the relationship between encephalitis and alterations of cytokine levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum.

METHODS

We found possibly suitable studies by searching PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, systematically from inception to August 2021. 23 articles were included in the meta-analysis. To investigate sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted. The protocol of the study has been registered in PROSPERO with a registration ID of CRD42021289298.

RESULTS

A total of 23 met our eligibility criteria to be included in the meta-analysis. A total of 12 cytokines were included in the meta-analysis of CSF concentration. Moreover, 5 cytokines were also included in the serum/plasma concentration meta-analysis. According to the analyses, patients with encephalitis had higher CSF amounts of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, CXCL10, and TNF-α than healthy controls. The alteration in the concentration of IL-2, IL-4, IL-17, CCL2, CXCL9, CXCL13, and IFN-γ was not significant. In addition, the serum/plasma levels of the TNF-α were increased in encephalitis patients, but serum/plasma concentration of the IL-6, IL-10, CXCL10, and CXCL13 remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides evidence for higher CSF concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, CXCL10, and TNF-α in encephalitis patients compared to controls. The diagnostic and prognostic value of these cytokines and chemokines should be investigated in future studies.

Determining an infectious or autoimmune etiology in encephalitis

OBJECTIVES

Early presentation and workup for acute infectious (IE) and autoimmune encephalitis (AE) are similar. This study aims to identify routine laboratory markers at presentation that are associated with IE or AE.

METHODS

This was a multi-center retrospective study at three tertiary care hospitals in New York City analyzing demographic and clinical data from patients diagnosed with definitive encephalitis based on a confirmed pathogen and/or autoantibody and established criteria for clinical syndromes.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty-three individuals with confirmed acute meningoencephalitis were included. An infectious-nonbacterial (NB) pathogen was identified in 151/333 (45.40%), bacterial pathogen in 95/333 (28.50%), and autoantibody in 87/333 (26.10%). NB encephalitis was differentiated from AE by the presence of fever (NB 62.25%, AE 24.10%; p < 0.001), higher CSF white blood cell (WBC) (median 78 cells/μL, 8.00 cells/μL; p < 0.001), higher CSF protein (76.50 mg/dL, 40.90 mg/dL; p < 0.001), lower CSF glucose (58.00 mg/dL, 69.00 mg/dL; p < 0.001), lower serum WBC (7.80 cells/μL, 9.72 cells/μL; p < 0.050), higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (19.50 mm/HR, 13.00 mm/HR; p < 0.05), higher C-reactive protein (6.40 mg/L, 1.25 mg/L; p = 0.005), and lack of antinuclear antibody titers (>1:40; NB 11.54%, AE 32.73%; p < 0.001). CSF-to-serum WBC ratio was significantly higher in NB compared to AE (NB 11.3, AE 0.99; p < 0.001). From these findings, the association of presenting with fever, CSF WBC ≥50 cells/μL, and CSF protein ≥75 mg/dL was explored in ruling-out AE. When all three criteria are present, an AE was found to be highly unlikely (sensitivity 92%, specificity 75%, negative predictive value 95%, and positive predictive value 64%).

INTERPRETATIONS

Specific paraclinical data at initial presentation may risk stratify which patients have an IE versus AE.

Intensive care management of patients with viral encephalitis

Viral encephalitis is a severe syndrome that can lead to encephalopathy, seizures, focal deficits, and neurological sequelae and death. It is mainly caused by neurotropic herpes viruses (i.e., HSV and VZV), although other pathogens may be observed in specific geographic regions or conditions. Recent advances in neuroimaging and molecular biology (PCR, metagenomics) allow for faster and more accurate etiological diagnoses, although their benefits need to be confirmed to provide guidelines for their use and interpretation. Despite intravenous acyclovir therapy and supportive care, outcomes remain poor in about two-thirds of herpes encephalitis patients requiring ICU admission. Randomized clinical trials focusing on symptomatic measures (i.e. early ICU admission, fever control, and treatment of seizures/status epilepticus) or adjunctive immunomodulatory therapies (i.e. steroids, intravenous immunoglobulins) to improve neurologic outcomes have not been conducted in the ICU setting. Large prospective multicenter studies combining clinical, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging data are needed to improve current knowledge on care pathways, long-term outcomes, and prognostication.