A Phase II/III, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, dose-ranging study of the safety and efficacy of OTX-101 in the treatment of dry eye disease

Recent United States Developments in the Pharmacological Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Dry eye disease (DED) can arise from a variety of factors, including inflammation, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and neurosensory abnormalities. Individuals with DED may exhibit a range of clinical signs, including tear instability, reduced tear production, and epithelial disruption, that are driven by different pathophysiological contributors. Those affected often report a spectrum of pain and visual symptoms that can impact physical and mental aspects of health, placing an overall burden on an individual's well-being. This cumulative impact of DED on an individual's activities and on society underscores the importance of finding diverse and effective management strategies. Such management strategies necessitate an understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms that contribute to DED in the individual patient. Presently, the majority of approved therapies for DED address T cell-mediated inflammation, with their tolerability and effectiveness varying across different studies. However, there is an emergence of treatments that target additional aspects of the disease, including novel inflammatory pathways, abnormalities of the eyelid margin, and neuronal function. These developments may allow for a more nuanced and precise management strategy for DED. This review highlights the recent pharmacological advancements in DED therapy in the United States. It discusses the mechanisms of action of these new treatments, presents key findings from clinical trials, discusses their current stage of development, and explores their potential applicability to different sub-types of DED. By providing a comprehensive overview of products in development, this review aims to contribute valuable insights to the ongoing efforts in enhancing the therapeutic options available to individuals suffering from DED.

Dry Eye Disease: An Update on Changing Perspectives on Causes, Diagnosis, and Management

Dry eye disease is a common clinical problem encountered by ophthalmologists worldwide. Interest in this entity has increased in recent years due to the consequences it has on the ocular surface after any surface procedure. With changing times, several new factors have come to light that can influence this disease. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic has also been greatly felt, with a range of causes, starting from increased screen work to inflammatory processes, exacerbating the condition in many. With changes in the concepts of the etiopathogenesis of the disease, a paradigm shift has taken place in the approaches to treatment. More researchers are in favor of a new tear film-oriented approach that tries to localize the disease to a single component in the tear film. Innovation of newer techniques for the treatment of meibomian gland disease has also made its foray into clinical ophthalmology. Newer drug formulations and molecules are underway to better treat the inflammatory component of the disease. Many other receptors and targets for the treatment of dry eyes are being researched. This review hopes to provide a succinct, narrative summary of the relevant research on dry eye disease to date to increase awareness about the nature and future course of this disease and its management.

Recent Advances in Nanotechnology for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Dry eye disease (DED) incidence is continuously growing, positioning it to become an emergent health issue over the next few years. Several topical treatments are commonly used to treat DED; however, reports indicate that only a minor proportion of drug bioavailability is achieved by the majority of eye drops available on the market. In this context, enhancing drug ability to overcome ocular barriers and prolonging its residence time on the ocular surface represent a new challenge in the field of ocular carrier systems. Therefore, research has focused on the development of multi-functional nanosystems, such as nanoemulsions, liposomes, dendrimers, hydrogels, and other nanosized carriers. These systems are designed to improve topical drug bioavailability and efficacy and, at the same time, require fewer daily administrations, with potentially reduced side effects. This review summarizes the different nanotechnologies developed, their role in DED, and the nanotechnology-based eyedrops currently approved for DED treatment.

United States Regulatory Approval of Topical Treatments for Dry Eye

PURPOSE

To report the heterogeneity in methodology of clinical trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval of topical dry eye treatments.

DESIGN

Comparative analysis of clinical trials' methods.

METHODS

We reviewed the online, publicly available FDA database, application review files, ClinicalTrials.gov registry records, and journal articles for each FDA-approved topical dry eye treatment. For each trial, we extracted information about the study, patient demographics, treatment names and doses, sample size in each arm, and the measurement instrument in a systematic fashion.

RESULTS

Fourteen trials were included that assessed 5 topical treatments for dry eye (cyclosporine 0.05%, cyclosporine 0.09%, lifitegrast 5%, and loteprednol 0.25% eye drops and varenicline 0.03-mg nasal spray). Median treatment duration was 12 weeks (range, 2-24 weeks). In all trials, treatments, including varying concentrations of the same treatment, were compared with vehicle. Twelve trials (85.7%) evaluated a primary clinician-measured clinical sign, and 10 trials (71.4%) evaluated a primary patient-reported symptom. Corneal staining was the most frequently evaluated clinical sign primary outcome, reported in half (6 of 12) of the trials, and was graded using 4 different scoring systems. Conjunctival staining, conjunctival hyperemia, and tear production were each measured using 2 different scoring systems. Ocular discomfort, the only patient-reported symptom primary outcome, was measured using 5 different instruments.

CONCLUSION

A variety of outcome measures were used in these clinical trials. Clinically meaningful dry eye outcome measures and standardized measurements can optimize the assessment of and comparison of therapeutic benefits.

Real-world treatment patterns of OTX-101 ophthalmic solution, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Dry eye disease (DED) is a disorder characterized by loss of tear film homeostasis that causes ocular surface inflammation and damage. The incidence of DED increases with age. Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CEQUA®; OTX-101), cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis®; CsA), and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5% (Xiidra®; LFT) are anti-inflammatory agents indicated for DED. This analysis compared treatment patterns in patients with DED receiving OTX-101, CsA, or LFT.

METHODS

This real-world, retrospective, longitudinal cohort study utilized Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse claims from July 2019 to June 2021. The dataset included all patients with OTX-101 claims and patients with CsA or LFT claims randomly selected 2:1 to OTX-101. Patients were sorted into 3 cohorts based on index treatment. Index date was that of first treatment claim, and follow-up period was from index date to end of clinical activity or data availability. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), probability of discontinuation, and treatment persistence were assessed for OTX-101 vs. CsA, then OTX-101 vs. LFT. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age and prior DED treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to examine TTD. A logistic model evaluated association between index treatment and discontinuation. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P-values were reported, with statistically significant associations based on P-values < 0.05.

RESULTS

Overall, 7102 patients (OTX-101 n = 1846; CsA n = 2248; LFT n = 3008) were eligible. Median TTD was 354 days for patients receiving OTX-101 vs. 241 days for CsA and 269 days for LFT. Log-rank test indicated TTD was significantly longer for patients on OTX-101 vs. CsA (P = 0.033). Patients on CsA were 35% more likely to discontinue treatment than patients on OTX-101; OTX-101 and LFT groups had similar discontinuation rates. After 360 days, 49.8% of patients receiving OTX-101 remained on treatment vs. 39.4% of patients on CsA (P = 0.036) and 44.0% of patients on LFT (P = 0.854).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving OTX-101 remained on treatment significantly longer and were significantly less likely to discontinue treatment than patients on CsA. Older patients remained on OTX-101 significantly longer than CsA. These findings highlight treatment pattern differences in patients with DED receiving these anti-inflammatory agents.

Role of topical and systemic immunosuppression in aqueous-deficient dry eye disease

Immunosuppression in aqueous-deficient dry eye disease (ADDE) is required not only to improve the symptoms and signs but also to prevent further progression of the disease and its sight-threatening sequelae. This immunomodulation can be achieved through topical and/or systemic medications, and the choice of one drug over the other is determined by the underlying systemic disease. These immunosuppressive agents require a minimum of 6-8 weeks to achieve their beneficial effect, and during this time, the patient is usually placed on topical corticosteroids. Antimetabolites such as methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil, along with calcineurin inhibitors, are commonly used as first-line medications. The latter have a pivotal role in immunomodulation since T cells contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of ocular surface inflammation in dry eye disease. Alkylating agents are largely limited to controlling acute exacerbations with pulse doses of cyclophosphamide. Biologic agents, such as rituximab, are particularly useful in patients with refractory disease. Each group of drugs has its own side-effect profiles and requires a stringent monitoring schedule that must be followed to prevent systemic morbidity. A customized combination of topical and systemic medications is usually required to achieve adequate control, and this review aims to help the clinician choose the most appropriate modality and monitoring regimen for a given case of ADDE.

Breaking Barriers in Eye Treatment: Polymeric Nano-Based Drug-Delivery System for Anterior Segment Diseases and Glaucoma

The eye has anatomical structures that function as robust static and dynamic barriers, limiting the penetration, residence time, and bioavailability of medications administered topically. The development of polymeric nano-based drug-delivery systems (DDS) could be the solution to these challenges: it can pass through ocular barriers, offering higher bioavailability of administered drugs to targeted tissues that are otherwise inaccessible; it can stay in ocular tissues for longer periods of time, requiring fewer drug administrations; and it can be made up of polymers that are biodegradable and nano-sized, minimizing the undesirable effects of the administered molecules. Therefore, therapeutic innovations in polymeric nano-based DDS have been widely explored for ophthalmic drug-delivery applications. In this review, we will give a comprehensive overview of polymeric nano-based drug-delivery systems (DDS) used in the treatment of ocular diseases. We will then examine the current therapeutic challenges of various ocular diseases and analyze how different types of biopolymers can potentially enhance our therapeutic options. A literature review of the preclinical and clinical studies published between 2017 and 2022 was conducted. Thanks to the advances in polymer science, the ocular DDS has rapidly evolved, showing great promise to help clinicians better manage patients.

Anti-Inflammatories in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: A Review

Inflammation is an important driver of dry eye disease (DED) pathogenesis. An initial insult that results in the loss of tear film homeostasis can initiate a nonspecific innate immune response that leads to a chronic and self-sustaining inflammation of the ocular surface, which results in classic symptoms of dry eye. This initial response is followed by a more prolonged adaptive immune response, which can perpetuate and aggravate inflammation and result in a vicious cycle of chronic inflammatory DED. Effective anti-inflammatory therapies can help patients exit this cycle, and effective diagnosis of inflammatory DED and selection of the most appropriate treatment are therefore key to successful DED management and treatment. This review explores the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the immune and inflammatory components of DED, and examines the evidence base for the use of currently available topical treatment options. These agents include topical steroid therapy, calcineurin inhibitors, T cell integrin antagonists, antibiotics, autologous serum/plasma therapy, and omega-3 fatty acid dietary supplements.

Does Dry Eye Disease Severity Impact Efficacy of Varenicline Solution Nasal Spray on Sign and Symptom Treatment Outcomes?

SIGNIFICANCE

There is a clinical necessity for dry eye disease treatments that perform across a broad range of presenting patient severities. Varenicline solution nasal spray (VNS), a unique cholinergic agonist ocular surface-sparing nasal spray therapy, demonstrated significant improvement in both signs and symptoms of dry eye disease in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe symptoms as the clinical studies enrolled a more real-world patient population.

PURPOSE

This study evaluated efficacy outcomes for VNS in patients with mild-moderate and severe dry eye disease.

METHODS

An analysis of integrated data from two randomized clinical trials, ONSET-1 (NCT03636061) and ONSET-2 (NCT04036292) (vehicle control [VC], n = 294; VNS 0.03 mg, n = 308), was performed. Adults 22 years or older with dry eye disease, Ocular Surface Disease Index score of ≥23, corneal fluorescein staining score of ≥2 in ≥1 regions/≥4 all regions, and Schirmer Test Score (STS) of ≤10 mm (no restrictions on Eye Dryness Score [EDS]) were included in this study. Efficacy was evaluated using analysis of covariance among pre-specified subgroups of mild-moderate and severe baseline disease severity defined by STS (≤5 vs. >5) and EDS (<60 vs. ≥60). Consistency of effect was evaluated by interaction tests.

RESULTS

No treatment-subgroup interactions were observed for all end points ( P > .05). The odds of achieving a ≥10-mm improvement in STS for VNS versus VC for patients with baseline STS ≤5 and >5 were 3.4(95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 5.6) and 2.3(1.3 to 4.0) and for EDS of <60 and ≥60 were 3.4(1.9 to 6.1) and 2.5(1.5 to 4.0). Least-squares mean treatment/VC differences in change from baseline in EDS for patients with baseline STS ≤5 or >5 were -7.4(95% confidence interval, -12.5 to -2.4) and -2.8(-8.7 to 3.1); EDS of <60 and ≥60 were -2.9(-8.3 to 2.5) and -8.1(-13.6 to -2.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with VC, VNS improved tear production and patient-reported symptoms in patients with dry eye disease, demonstrating consistency of effect regardless of initial presenting severity.

Effect of OTX-101 in Patients with Dry Eye Disease at Day 14 of Treatment: Ocular Surface Endpoint Results from the Phase 2b/3 Clinical Trial

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder characterized by loss of tear film homeostasis, which initiates a cycle of ocular surface inflammation and damage. As ocular discomfort symptoms associated with DED can decrease quality of life, affected patients prefer treatments that rapidly improve the underlying disease process. OTX-101 0.09% (CEQUA®) is indicated to increase tear production in patients with DED. The current analysis assessed early efficacy of OTX-101 0.09% in adult patients with bilateral DED by evaluating ocular surface endpoints after 14 days of treatment in the phase 2b/3 trial. In this randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, dose-ranging study, patients received one drop of OTX-101 0.05%, OTX-101 0.09%, or vehicle per eye twice daily for 84 days. Corneal staining, conjunctival staining, tear breakup time (TBUT), and modified Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) total global symptom score were assessed at baseline and Days 14, 28, 42, 56, and 84/early discontinuation. Overall, 455 patients were randomized (OTX-101 0.05%, n=151; OTX-101 0.09%, n=152; vehicle, n=152); only baseline and Day 14 results for the approved OTX-101 0.09% formulation and vehicle are presented. Least squares (LS) mean (standard error [SE]) change from baseline in conjunctival staining score was -1.3 (0.1) for OTX-101 and -1.0 (0.1) for vehicle. LS mean (SE) change from baseline in corneal staining score was -1.1 (0.17) for OTX-101 and -0.7 (0.17) for vehicle. LS mean (SE) change from baseline in TBUT was 0.52 (0.15) for OTX-101 and 0.36 (0.15) for vehicle. LS mean (SE) change from baseline in modified SANDE total global symptom score was -4.93 (1.54) for OTX-101 and -9.1 (1.54) for vehicle. OTX-101 0.09% demonstrated a numerically greater treatment effect compared with vehicle in conjunctival staining, corneal staining, and TBUT after 14 days.

Comparison of seven cyclosporine A formulations for dry eye disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background: Dry eye disease is a common ocular surface disease affecting tens of millions of people worldwide. It is characterized by an unstable tear film and increasing prevalence. Different commercial formulations of cyclosporine A for dry eye have been approved, however, it is still unclear whether the differences in formulations of these products will make a difference in clinical efficacy and safety. Methods: Randomized controlled trials of commercial cyclosporine A formulation for dry eye disease were searched in Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane controlled trials registries and Web of Science from inception till 1 December 2021. Independent literature screening, data extraction, quality evaluation, and the study in line with quality standards were analyzed by using Stata16.0 software. The study is registered with PROSPERO under the number CRD42022301423. Code and data for this study is publicly available (https://github.com/DongYangGao/Dongyang.github.io.git). Results: 21 randomized clinical trials with a total of 4,107 participants were included in this study. Restasis® (OR-4.82, 95% CI-6.18 to 3.45, SUCRA 77.2%) was the most effective commercial formulation for reducing OSDI, Zirun® (SUCRA 73.9%) performed better in improving Schirmer's test. TJ Cyporin® (SUCRA 65.3%) ranked first in terms of improving tear film break-up time. For treatment-emergent adverse events incidence, Clacier® was close to placebo. The risk of reporting bias is considered low. Conclusion: In the comparison of outcomes included in this study, the optimal order of various commercial cyclosporine A formulations is different, so it is difficult to select the optimal formula. Appropriate commercial formulations should be selected according to patients' conditions in clinical practice.

Results from a Prospective, Open-Label, Phase 4 Pilot Study of Repository Corticotropin Injection for Moderate and Severe Dry Eye Disease

INTRODUCTION

There is a substantial unmet need for effective therapies to treat patients with refractory dry eye disease (DED). The goal of this open-label pilot study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of repository corticotropin injection (RCI; Acthar® Gel; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals) in subjects with DED, most of whom did not experience adequate response to standard-of-care therapies.

METHODS

Adults with moderate or severe-acute DED received 80 U of subcutaneous RCI twice weekly for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy outcomes were improvements in corneal fluorescein staining of superficial punctate keratitis (SPK) lesions and Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) scores. Secondary outcomes included changes in Schirmer's test scores, conjunctival lissamine green staining, erythema, intraocular pressure (IOP), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Adverse events (AEs) were assessed continuously throughout the study.

RESULTS

Fifteen subjects received at least 1 dose of RCI, and 12 subjects completed the study. Compared to baseline (day 1), significantly fewer fluorescein-stained SPK lesions were detected at day 14 (p = 0.0250) and day 84 (p = 0.0240) after RCI treatment. Mean SANDE scores progressively declined from 62.0 at baseline to 46.9 at day 84. Erythema (p = 0.0046), conjunctival lissamine green staining of SPK lesions (p = 0.0317), and IOP (p = 0.0052) were all significantly improved after 12 weeks of RCI therapy. Schirmer's test scores and BCVA showed no significant changes throughout the study. No ocular AEs or deaths occurred, and no new safety signals were identified for RCI.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that RCI may be a safe and effective treatment for moderate and severe DED.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03287635.

Selective Pharmacologic Therapies for Dry Eye Disease Treatment: Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety Data Review from Preclinical Studies and Pivotal Trials

Keratoconjunctivitis sicca, also known as dry eye disease (DED), is a prevalent, multifactorial disease associated with compromised ocular lubrication, ocular surface inflammation and damage, and ocular symptoms. Several anti-inflammatory, topical ophthalmic therapies are available to treat clinical signs and symptoms of DED in the USA and Europe. Cyclosporine A (CsA)-based formulations include an ophthalmic emulsion of 0.05% CsA (CsA 0.05%), a cationic emulsion (CE) of CsA 0.1% (CsA CE), and an aqueous nanomicellar formulation of 0.09% CsA (OTX-101). Lifitegrast is a 5% ophthalmic solution of a lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 antagonist that is believed to target T cell activation and recruitment to inhibit ocular inflammation. Here we provide a comprehensive review summarising preclinical studies and pivotal trial data for these treatments to provide a complete understanding of their efficacy and safety profile. Overall, data in the evaluated studies show a favourable risk-benefit profile for the use of targeted topical anti-inflammatory pharmacologic treatments in patients with DED. Pivotal trials for CsA 0.05%, CsA CE, OTX-101, and lifitegrast clearly demonstrate treatment efficacy compared to vehicle across treatments with no serious ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Patients using ophthalmic treatments reported ocular TEAEs more frequently than those treated with vehicle; however, relatively few TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation. The specific signs and symptoms of DED that improve with treatment vary with the treatment prescribed. Long-term and direct comparative studies between treatments are needed to further understand treatment differences in efficacy and safety profiles.

Current trends in pharmaceutical treatment of Dry Eye Disease: A review

Dry eye disease (DED), keratoconjunctivitis sicca or dysfunctional tear syndrome, is the most prevalent ophthalmic disease which affects a substantial segment of people worldwide with increasing frequency. It is considered a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface and tear film, characterized by a variation of signs and symptoms. The symptoms range from mild to severe itching, burning, irritation, eye fatigue, and ocular inflammation that may lead to potential damage to the cornea, conjunctiva and even vision loss. Correspondingly, depending on the different manifestations and pathophysiology, the treatment must be tailored specifically to each patient by targeting the specific mechanisms implicated in their disease. Currently, there are several medical products and techniques available or under investigation for the treatment of DED. The present article focused on the pathophysiology of DED, the new diagnostic approach and the recently developed drug delivery systems or devices reducing the progress of the disease and treating the causes.

A phase II randomized trial to evaluate the long-term (12-week) efficacy and safety of OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray for dry eye disease: The MYSTIC study

PURPOSE

Dry eye disease is characterized by loss of tear film stability. OC-01 (varenicline solution) is a small-molecule nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist administered as a nasal spray that stimulates tear production.

METHODS

In MYSTIC (NCT03873246) patients aged ≥22 years with dry eye disease were randomized 1:1:1 to OC-01 0.03 mg, OC-01 0.06 mg, or vehicle (n = 41 per group), administered twice daily via intranasal spray, for 12 weeks (84 days). Primary efficacy endpoint was mean change from baseline in anesthetized Schirmer's test score (STS) in study eye at day (D) 84.

RESULTS

Patients receiving OC-01 0.03 and 0.06 mg had statistically significantly increased tear production at D84 versus vehicle; least squares mean changes from baseline in STS were 10.8 mm and 11.0 mm for OC-01 0.03 and 0.06 mg, respectively. A trend toward a higher proportion of patients experiencing ≥10-mm improvement in STS from baseline was observed with OC-01 0.03 mg (36.6%; p > 0.05), and was significant for OC-01 0.06 mg (48.8%; p = 0.024), versus vehicle (24.4%). Non-ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 21 patients; the most common was sneezing (OC-01 0.03 mg, 2 [4.9%]; OC-01 0.06 mg, 3 [7.3%]), with similar frequencies between treatment groups. No severe or serious TEAEs were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray improved tear production in patients with dry eye disease over a long-term (12-week) period, and represents a receptor neuro-activator with a nasal route of administration that spares the ocular surface to stimulate tear production.

The Effect of OTX-101 on Tear Production in Patients with Severe Tear-deficient Dry Eye Disease: A Pooled Analysis of Phase 2b/3 and Phase 3 Studies

PURPOSE

Impaired tear production - a common sign of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) - is associated with qualitative or quantitative tear deficiency. OTX-101 0.09% is a novel, nanomicellar formulation of cyclosporine A approved in the US for increasing tear production in patients with KCS. We present a pooled analysis of the phase 2b/3 and phase 3 studies evaluating the effect of OTX-101 on tear production in a subgroup of patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca with severely impaired tear production (Schirmer's score <5 mm in either eye at baseline).

METHODS

In these randomized, double-masked studies, patients instilled 1 drop OTX-101 or vehicle per eye twice daily for 84 days. Pooled efficacy endpoints included percent (%) of patients with ≥10 mm change from baseline and mean change from baseline in Schirmer's score at day 84. Pooled safety endpoints included adverse event monitoring.

RESULTS

Subgroup analyses included 133 and 113 patients receiving OTX-101 and vehicle, respectively. Mean baseline (BL) Schirmer's score ± standard deviation was 2.7 ± 1.2 for OTX-101 and 2.5 ± 1.1 mm for vehicle (P = .3203). On day 84, number (%) of patients with ≥10 mm Schirmer's score change from baseline was 30 (22.6%) and 12 (10.6%, P = .0168); mean change from baseline ± standard deviation was 5.5 ± 8.0 and 3.6 (6.0, P = .0405) mm for OTX-101 and vehicle, respectively. Adverse events were mostly mild and did not require treatment.

CONCLUSION

OTX-101 administered twice daily for 84 days significantly improved tear production vs vehicle in patients with severely impaired tear production, as evidenced by significantly larger proportion of patients with ≥10 mm increases from baseline and higher mean change from baseline in Schirmer's scores.

Dry Eye Treatment with Topical Cyclosporine 0.1% in Chondroitin Sulfate Ophthalmic Emulsion

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of topical cyclosporine 0.1% in chondroitin sulfate emulsion for the treatment of dry eye.

Methods

This retrospective multicenter study included 100 eyes of 50 dry eye patients aged ≥18 years, with preoperative ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score >12 or corneal staining grade >1 (in either eye) who underwent dry eye treatment with topical cyclosporine 0.1% in chondroitin sulfate emulsion (Klarity-C, ImprimisRx) for 3 months. Postoperative evaluation included comparison of the changes in OSDI score and corneal staining grade after 3 months of treatment from baseline.

Results

From baseline to 3 months, a statistically significant improvement in mean OSDI scores (38.19 vs 24.18, p <0.001) as well as mean corneal staining grade (3.62 vs 2.20, p <0.001) was observed. The proportion of subjects with severe dry eye decreased from 62% to 20% and more than one-third (34%) of patients were in the normal OSDI range. The percentage of eyes with corneal staining grade of 2 or 3 decreased from 21% (baseline) to 8% at 3 months; 50% of the eyes had corneal staining grade of 0. The treatment was found to be safe with no adverse events observed in the study.

Conclusion

Dry eye treatment with twice daily cyclosporine 0.1% in chondroitin sulfate emulsion was found to be safe and effective in reducing signs and symptoms of dry eye.

Current and Future Pharmacological Therapies for the Management of Dry Eye

Dry eye disease (DED) is among the most common reasons for visiting eye care practitioners and represents a substantial health and cost burden. Disease prevalence ranges from 5% to 33% and is increasing in the younger population. The core mechanism of DED involves a vicious cycle where hyperosmolarity leads to an inflammatory cascade resulting in ocular surface damage. No cure is available for DED, and patients require ongoing disease management. Over-the-counter medications can provide temporary symptom relief but do not tackle the inflammatory pathophysiology of DED. A number of medications with anti-inflammatory activity are available, but there is a need for development of pharmacotherapies with novel delivery methods and targets to widen the variety of treatment options. This review discusses current anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapies approved in the United States and Europe for DED and highlights novel drugs that have been recently approved or are in development.

Phase 3 Efficacy (Worse-Eye Analysis) and Long-Term Safety Evaluation of OTX-101 in Patients with Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

Background

OTX-101 is approved for treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS). We present results of a phase 3 worse-eye efficacy analysis and 1-year safety extension.

Methods

During the double-masked treatment phase, patients with bilateral KCS were randomized 1:1 to 12 weeks OTX-101 or vehicle 1 drop per eye twice daily. Efficacy assessments included Schirmer’s test and corneal and conjunctival staining. All patients who completed the treatment phase were eligible for enrollment in the open-label extension and received 1 drop OTX-101 twice daily for up to 52 weeks. Safety endpoints included adverse event (AE) monitoring, Snellen visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), slit-lamp examination (SLE), and dilated fundoscopy.

Results

Overall, 745 and 258 patients enrolled in the treatment and safety extension phases, respectively. At 12 weeks, number (%) of patients with Schirmer’s score increase of ≥10 mm from baseline was 76 (20.5%) vs. 42 (11.3%) for OTX-101 vs. vehicle (P=0.0005). OTX-101 significantly improved total conjunctival staining vs. vehicle at week 12 (least squares mean change from baseline −1.65 [0.12] vs. −1.12 [0.12], P=0.0013), and number (%) of patients with clear central corneas vs. vehicle at week 12 (222 [64.0%] vs. 199 [55.3%], P=0.0179). In the 1-year safety extension, AEs were mostly mild; instillation site pain was most common in 59 (22.9%) patients (17 [13.2%] vs. 42 [32.6%] patients receiving prior OTX-101 and vehicle). No safety concerns were raised by VA, IOP, SLE, and fundoscopy.

Conclusion

OTX-101 efficacy was confirmed in the eye with lower baseline Schirmer’s score. OTX-101 was well tolerated long term.

Clinical Trial

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on July 27, 2016. NCT02845674 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02845674?term=OTX-101&draw=2&rank=1.

New Nanoparticle Formulation for Cyclosporin A: In Vitro Assessment

Cyclosporin A (CsA) is a molecule with well-known immunosuppressive properties. As it also acts on the opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP), CsA has been evaluated for ischemic heart diseases (IHD). However, its distribution throughout the body and its physicochemical characteristics strongly limit the use of CsA for intravenous administration. In this context, nanoparticles (NPs) have emerged as an opportunity to circumvent the above-mentioned limitations. We have developed in our laboratory an innovative nanoformulation based on the covalent bond between squalene (Sq) and cyclosporin A to avoid burst release phenomena and increase drug loading. After a thorough characterization of the bioconjugate, we proceeded with a nanoprecipitation in aqueous medium in order to obtain SqCsA NPs of well-defined size. The SqCsA NPs were further characterized using dynamic light scattering (DLS), cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryoTEM), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and their cytotoxicity was evaluated. As the goal is to employ them for IHD, we evaluated the cardioprotective capacity on two cardiac cell lines. A strong cardioprotective effect was observed on cardiomyoblasts subjected to experimental hypoxia/reoxygenation. Further research is needed in order to understand the mechanisms of action of SqCsA NPs in cells. This new formulation of CsA could pave the way for possible medical application.

Topical preservative-free ophthalmic treatments: an unmet clinical need

Introduction: The main role of preservatives in eyedrops is to ensure sterility and microbiological integrity of the drug, and to facilitate the penetration of active compounds into the eye. However, several studies documented significant toxic effects induced by preservatives, especially on the ocular surface. Consequently, most of the ophthalmic medications became progressively available in preservative-free (PF) formulations.Areas covered: We analyzed pre-clinical and clinical studies on PF eyedrops with particular attention to common chronic diseases such as dry eye and glaucoma. We discussed about the pros and cons of using PF eyedrops, in terms of efficacy, safety, and social-economic aspects.Expert opinion: There are still unresolved issues that make hard for PF medications to definitively conquer the drug market. Despite robust pre-clinical evidences of less toxicity, the low number of randomized clinical trials does not permit to state that PF eyedrops have, in clinical practice, a similar efficacy or a higher safety compared to preserved forms. These aspects limit their use to chronic diseases requiring long-term therapies with multiple daily instillations, especially in the presence of concomitant ophthalmic diseases that expose to a risk of ocular surface worsening.

A Review of the Mechanism of Action of Cyclosporine A: The Role of Cyclosporine A in Dry Eye Disease and Recent Formulation Developments

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface and tear film that has gained awareness as a public health problem. Characteristics of DED include tear film instability, hyperosmolarity, and ocular surface inflammation, which can occur independently or may be a sequela of numerous ocular diseases, ocular surgery or contact lens wear. Much has been learned about the impact of the disease to help affected individuals who report symptoms of poor vision, pain, and tearing. Recently, new research highlights the importance of the role of ocular surface inflammation and damage in DED-leading to a vicious cycle of inflammation as well as loss of tear film homeostasis. DED immunopathophysiology is characterized by four stages: initiation, amplification, recruitment, and re-initiation. Cyclosporine is proven to be a valuable ophthalmic therapeutic for DED through its immunomodulatory actions and regulation of the adaptive immune response. Cyclosporine mechanism of action is well described in the published literature and the myriad of benefits in all four stages lend a broad-based immunomodulatory function particularly suitable for addressing DED. Furthermore, cyclosporine has unique goblet cell density improvement capabilities as well as anti-apoptotic properties. Topical formulations of cyclosporine are centered around addressing the highly lipophilic nature of the molecule. The poor aqueous solubility of cyclosporine traditionally presented technical challenges in drug delivery to the ocular surface. Newer formulations such as cationic emulsions and nanomicellar aqueous solutions address formulation, tissue concentration, and drug delivery challenges.

A Comprehensive Review of the Clinical Trials Conducted for Dry Eye Disease and the Impact of the Vehicle Comparators in These Trials

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface characterized by loss of homeostasis of the tear film and accompanied by symptoms such as ocular discomfort and visual disturbance. DED is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical care in the United States and across the world. Despite this, there are a limited number of pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of DED in the United States and Europe. This review examines the different pivotal trials for DED medications and the impact the vehicle in each trial.In recent clinical trials, the vehicle of the active formulation of the medication is often used as the active comparator. A literature review of published dry eye clinical trials was performed to identify the pivotal clinical trials of DED medications and to compare treatment effect and further understand the impact of the vehicle on clinical trial outcomes.The pivotal clinical trials for the currently approved treatments for dry eye have widely varying study designs. The variations include differences in inclusion criteria, outcome measures and efficacy endpoints, and whether or not the use of concomitant artificial tears is allowed. These differences make it difficult for accurate comparisons to be made between DED medications. Each trial demonstrated that the vehicle alone has some beneficial effect on signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.This review discusses the varying trial designs and vehicles used in the pivotal studies for the four approved dry eye medications in the United States and Europe, as well as novel vehicles under development and clinical trial recommendations.

Preclinical Efficacy Comparison of Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution 0.09% vs Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.05% vs Ciclosporin Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.1% in a NOD Mouse Model of Dry Eye Disease

Introduction

Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CsA 0.09% sol) is approved to increase tear production in patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. This study evaluated the efficacy of CsA 0.09% sol vs cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (CsA 0.05% eml) vs ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion 0.1% (CsA 0.1% eml) in a NOD mice model.

Methods

Mice were randomized and administered placebo, CsA 0.09% sol twice daily, CsA 0.05% eml twice daily, CsA 0.09% sol once daily, or CsA 0.1% eml once daily in the conjunctival sac of both eyes for 60 days. Tear volume was measured with phenol red threads at baseline and 4 hours after treatment every 15 days. On day 58, the corneal surface was observed under a slit-lamp after staining with 3% lissamine green administered into the inferior lateral conjunctival sac. On day 61, mice were euthanized, globes excised, sliced into 4 µm sections in 3 areas per section, and stained. Total number of stained goblet cell/µm was counted, and the sum per eye was averaged. Lacrimal gland tissues were removed and interleukin (IL) 1-β cytokine levels estimated.

Results

Groups comprised 11 mice each, including an untreated normal and untreated diseased control group (7 groups total). CsA 0.09% sol twice daily significantly increased tear volume on day 30, 45, and 60 vs CsA 0.05% eml (P<0.05, <0.001, <0.001, respectively) and vs CsA 0.1% eml on day 60 (P<0.05); CsA 0.09% sol once daily significantly increased tear volume on day 45 vs CsA 0.05% eml (P<0.05). Goblet cell density significantly increased with CsA 0.09% sol twice daily vs placebo and NOD control (P<0.01 both). There was no significant difference in corneal staining and IL-1β levels with CsA 0.09% sol.

Conclusion

Sixty-day treatment with CsA 0.09% sol showed comparatively improved preclinical results vs CsA 0.05% eml and CsA 0.1% eml.

Efficacy and Safety of OTX-101, a Novel Nanomicellar Formulation of Cyclosporine A, for the Treatment of Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca: Pooled Analysis of a Phase 2b/3 and Phase 3 Study

BACKGROUND

OTX-101 (CEQUA™) is approved in the United States for treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS). This pooled analysis of 2 studies (phase 2b/3 and phase 3) evaluates the efficacy and safety of OTX-101 0.09% in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the subgroup of patients with a baseline Schirmer score less than 10 mm.

METHODS

In these randomized, multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled studies, patients received 1 drop of either OTX-101 or vehicle in both eyes twice daily. A Schirmer's test was performed at baseline and day 84/early discontinuation. Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) scores and adverse events were monitored at each visit.

RESULTS

The pooled analysis included 523 and 525 patients randomized to OTX-101 0.09% and vehicle, respectively. In the ITT population, 16.6% of eyes receiving OTX-101 and 9.0% of eyes receiving vehicle showed a day 84 increase in Schirmer score ≥10 mm from baseline (P<0.0001). In the subgroup with Schirmer score less than 10 mm at baseline, 18.7% and 10.2% of eyes receiving OTX-101 and vehicle, respectively, exhibited this outcome (P=0.0001). The mean (SD) percent change from baseline in global SANDE scores on day 84 in the ITT population was -29.0% (39.0%) and -30.4% (39.5%) for OTX-101 and vehicle groups, respectively. In the subgroup, the mean (SD) percent change was -27.3% (39.7%) and -31.4% (38.3%) for OTX-101 and vehicle groups, respectively. Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

OTX-101 improved tear production compared with vehicle. Both OTX-101 and vehicle showed improved SANDE scores over baseline. OTX-101 was well tolerated in patients with KCS.

Prodrugs and nanomicelles to overcome ocular barriers for drug penetration

INTRODUCTION

Ocular barriers hinder drug delivery and reduce drug bioavailability. This article focuses on enhancing drug absorption across the corneal and conjunctival epithelium. Both, transporter targeted prodrug formulations and nanomicellar strategy is proven to enhance the drug permeation of therapeutic agents across various ocular barriers. These strategies can increase aqueous drug solubility and stability of many hydrophobic drugs for topical ophthalmic formulations.

AREAS COVERED

The article discusses various ocular barriers, ocular influx, and efflux transporters. It elaborates various prodrug strategies used for enhancing drug absorption. Along with this, the article also describes nanomicellar formulation, its characteristic and advantages, and applications in for anterior and posterior segment drug delivery.

EXPERT OPINION

Prodrugs and nanomicellar formulations provide an effective strategy for improving drug absorption and drug bioavailability across various ocular barriers. It will be exciting to see the efficacy of nanomicelles for treating back of the eye disorders after their topical application. This is considered as a holy grail of ocular drug delivery due to the dynamic and static ocular barriers, restricting posterior entry of topically applied drug formulations.

The Role of Nano-ophthalmology in Treating Dry Eye Disease

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common multifactorial disease linked to the tears/ocular surface leading to eye discomfort, ocular surface damage, and visual disturbance. Antiinflammatory agents (steroids and cyclosporine A), hormonal therapy, antibiotics, nerve growth factors, essential fatty acids are used as treatment options of DED. Current therapies attempt to reduce the ocular discomfort by producing lubrication and stimulating gland/nerve(s) associated with tear production, without providing a permanent cure for dry eye. Nanocarrier systems show a great promise to revolutionize drug delivery in DED, offering many advantages such as site specific and sustained delivery of therapeutic agents. This review presents an overview, pathophysiology, prevalence and etiology of DED, with an emphasis on preclinical and clinical studies involving the use of nanocarrier systems in treating DED. Lay Summary: Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease associated with tear deficiency or excessive tear evaporation. There are several review articles that summarize DED, disease symptoms, causes and treatment approaches. Nanocarrier systems show a great promise to revolutionize drug delivery in DED, offering many advantages such as site specific and sustained delivery of therapeutic agents. Very few review articles summarize the findings on the use of nanotherapeutics in DED. In this review, we have exclusively discussed the preclinical and clinical studies of nanotherapeutics in DED therapy. This information will be attractive to both academic and pharmaceutical industry researchers working in DED therapeutics.

The role of Th17 immunity in chronic ocular surface disorders

Th17 cells have been implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. At the ocular surface, Th17 cells have been identified as key effector cells in chronic ocular surface disease. Evidence from murine studies indicates that following differentiation and expansion, Th17 cells migrate from the lymphoid tissues to the eye, where they release inflammatory cytokines including, but not limited to, their hallmark cytokine IL-17A. As the acute phase subsides, a population of long-lived memory Th17 cells persist, which predispose hosts both to chronic inflammation and severe exacerbations of disease; of great interest is the small subset of Th17/1 cells that secrete both IL-17A and IFN-γ in acute-on-chronic disease exacerbation. Over the past decade, substantial progress has been made in deciphering how Th17 cells interact with the immune and neuroimmune pathways that mediate chronic ocular surface disease. Here, we review (i) the evidence for Th17 immunity in chronic ocular surface disease, (ii) regulatory mechanisms that constrain the Th17 immune response, and (iii) novel therapeutic strategies targeting Th17 cells.

A Review of Topical Cyclosporine A Formulations-A Disease-Modifying Agent for Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

Keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) is a multifactorial disease characterized by tear hyperosmolarity, inflammation, and ocular surface damage. Cyclosporine A (CsA) is used as an effective disease-modifying agent to improve the signs and symptoms of KCS by reducing inflammation, which interferes with tear production. This review provides an overview of efficacy, safety, and limitations of currently marketed topical CsA formulations—including CsA ophthalmic emulsion, cationic nanoemulsion, and aqueous nanomicelles—and highlights newer technologies for controlled ocular delivery of CsA and their clinical implications. Long available emulsion formulations of CsA are oil-based and have several limitations, including slow onset of efficacy and low intraocular penetration and bioavailability. Aqueous CsA nanomicelle carriers produce rapid improvement in objective signs of KCS such as corneal and conjunctival staining as early as 4 weeks and have acceptable safety profiles. CsA formulations using semifluorinated alkanes or polyaphrons are currently in clinical development, having recently completed Phase 2 studies. Other carriers for CsA currently in the preclinical phase include microemulsions, polymeric aqueous and lyophilized micelles, and hydrogels; these novel formulations have yet to undergo clinical trials. Formulations that improve tissue availability of CsA may be beneficial in clinical practice by providing faster onset of relief and improving patient adherence.

Managing Dry Eye Disease and Facilitating Realistic Patient Expectations: A Review and Appraisal of Current Therapies

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface characterized by loss of homeostasis of the tear film and accompanied by ocular signs and symptoms such as corneal and conjunctival damage, patient discomfort, and visual disturbance. The prevalence of DED ranges from 5%−33%. Patients with DED may have a reduced quality of life due to their discomfort and visual disturbances. The multifactorial nature of DED requires a multi-targeted treatment approach to address the signs and symptoms. Treatment for DED should follow a step-wise approach beginning with education, dietary modification, and lid and lash hygiene, and progressing to pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. Ocular lubricants, a mainstay of DED therapy, provide temporary symptomatic relief for the patient, but do not address the underlying pathophysiology. Some currently available pharmacologic treatments that address the underlying pathophysiology of DED may have a delay of 3−6 months in the onset of therapeutic effect; however, these treatment options may also have tolerability issues. These challenges highlight the need for newer pharmacologic treatments with an earlier onset of observable clinical effect and the potential for improved tolerability profile. Patient education is vital to DED management and should convey the complex and chronic nature of DED. It is important for the eye care practitioner to set realistic expectations with the patient when managing DED to help improve treatment success. This helps the patient understand the need for ongoing treatment and that results will likely not be seen immediately. This review covers the current management of DED, focusing on pharmacologic management, and offers recommendations for the practitioner to help facilitate realistic patient expectations for the treatment of DED.

Effect of OTX-101, a Novel Nanomicellar Formulation of Cyclosporine A, on Corneal Staining in Patients With Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca: A Pooled Analysis of Phase 2b/3 and Phase 3 Studies

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Keratoconjunctivitis sicca affects 5% to 33% of the population and is often accompanied by symptoms such as burning and dryness. This pooled analysis evaluated total and central corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) in patients receiving OTX-101 0.09% or vehicle in phase 2b/3 and 3 studies and whether improvements in corneal staining correlated with improved visual acuity.

Ocular Distribution of Cyclosporine Following Topical Administration of OTX-101 in New Zealand White Rabbits

Purpose: Evaluate the ocular distribution, tolerability, and systemic exposure of cyclosporine (CsA) in New Zealand white rabbits following topical administration of OTX-101, a novel, clear aqueous nanomicellar solution developed for the treatment of dry eye disease (DED).

Methods: The study design included single- and repeat-dose phases. In the single-dose phase, rabbits received a single instillation of OTX-101 0.05% or CsA ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis^®; Allergan, Irvine, CA) as a comparator. In the repeat-dosing phase, OTX-101 (0.01%, 0.05%, or 0.1% CsA) or comparator was instilled 4 times per day for 7 days. Samples collected included whole blood, tears, and ocular tissues/fluids (aqueous humor, choroid-retina, conjunctiva, cornea, superior eyelid, third eyelid, iris/ciliary body, lacrimal gland, lens, sclera, and vitreous humor). CsA concentrations were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Results: Analysis included samples from 112 rabbits. The highest concentration of CsA following a single OTX-101 0.05% instillation occurred in the third eyelid (C_max = 1,200 ng/g). Concentrations of CsA in the cornea and superior bulbar conjunctiva increased in a dose-related manner following repeated administration of OTX-101 formulations; C_max [T_max (h)] for cornea was 1,543 ng/g (6.50), 5,410 ng/g (7.0), and 8,123 ng/g (6.50), for 0.01%, 0.05%, and 0.1% CsA concentrations, respectively; for superior bulbar conjunctiva was 726 ng/g (6.50), 1,468 ng/g (6.50), and 2,080 ng/g (6.25), respectively.

Conclusions: OTX-101 topical ophthalmic instillation resulted in extensive distribution of CsA in ocular tissues, particularly in target tissues for DED (cornea and conjunctiva), while systemic exposure was negligible.

Effect of OTX-101, a Novel Nanomicellar Formulation of Cyclosporine A, on Conjunctival Staining in Patients with Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca: A Pooled Analysis of Phase 2b/3 and 3 Clinical Trials

Purpose: Keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS), a multifactorial disease, is the most common ocular condition for patients seeking medical treatment and is characterized by ocular burning, stinging, and dryness. This pooled analysis examined the effect of OTX-101 0.09% versus vehicle on the total and individual conjunctival staining in patients with KCS from phase 2b/3 and phase 3 studies. Methods: In these randomized, multicenter, double-masked, and vehicle-controlled studies, patients received 1 drop of OTX-101 0.09% or vehicle in both eyes twice daily. The time points for the pooled analysis were baseline (day 0) and study days 28, 56, and 84/early discontinuation. Conjunctival staining was graded on a 0- to 3-point scale per zone and averaged over both eyes at each assessment. Pooled safety assessments included adverse event (AE) reporting. Results: The total mean (standard deviation) conjunctival staining scores at baseline were 5.4 (1.7) for OTX-101 (n = 523) and 5.5 (1.7) for vehicle (n = 525). OTX-101 versus vehicle significantly reduced the total conjunctival staining scores (P = 0.0316, <0.0001, and 0.0002) for days 28, 56, and 84, respectively. The most common treatment-related AE was instillation site pain (21.8% OTX-101 vs. 4.0% vehicle); most AEs were mild in nature. Conclusions: Treatment with OTX-101 versus vehicle significantly improved the conjunctival staining in KCS as early as 4 weeks, and the improvement was maintained through 12 weeks. OTX-101 was effective and well tolerated for use in KCS.

Practical guidance for the use of cyclosporine ophthalmic solutions in the management of dry eye disease

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease of ocular surface and tear film, and is a common disorder treated by eye care providers. It is well established that ocular surface inflammation has an important role in the pathophysiology of DED and that anti-inflammatory cyclosporine A (CsA) improves the treatment outcomes of most patients with DED. The purpose of this review is to provide guidance for practitioners in the use of topical CsA for the management of DED to improve patient satisfaction and the quality of life.

Therapeutic implications of nanomedicine for ocular drug delivery

Delivering therapeutics to the eye is challenging on multiple levels: rapid clearance of eyedrops from the ocular surface requires frequent instillation, which is difficult for patients; transport of drugs across the blood-retinal barrier when drugs are administered systemically, and the cornea when drugs are administered topically, is difficult to achieve; limited drug penetration to the back of the eye owing to the cornea, conjunctiva, sclera and vitreous barriers. Nanomedicine offers many advantages over conventional ophthalmic medications for effective ocular drug delivery because nanomedicine can increase the therapeutic index by overcoming ocular barriers, improving drug-release profiles and reducing potential drug toxicity. In this review, we highlight the therapeutic implications of nanomedicine for ocular drug delivery.

Advances in dry eye disease treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The prevalence and burden of dry eye disease continues to grow at a rapid pace, creating an increased need for new therapies. In a sector once limited to only a handful of treatments, clinicians now have multiple options available for patients who fail traditional therapies. This review summarizes the various treatment options available to clinicians treating complex dry eye disease patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

As we better understand the multifactorial mechanisms leading to dry eye disease, treatments increasingly focus on the amelioration of the underlying deficiencies and inflammation, rather than on transient symptomatic relief alone. Most topical medications seek to replace deficient growth factors and/or decrease inflammation on the ocular surface. The majority of new devices and procedures seek to treat meibomian gland dysfunction, with one new device stimulating tear production through utilizing the nasolacrimal reflex pathway.

SUMMARY

Clinicians have more options at their disposal in the treatment of dry eye disease than ever before, including topical medications and devices.

Topical application of polymeric nanomicelles in ophthalmology: a review on research efforts for the noninvasive delivery of ocular therapeutics

INTRODUCTION

Polymeric micelles represent nowadays an interesting formulative approach for ocular drug delivery, as they act as solubility enhancers of poorly soluble drugs and promote drug transport across cornea and sclera. In particular, in the last 5 years polymeric nanomicelles have been increasingly investigated to overcome some of the important challenges of the topical treatment of ocular diseases.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review was to gather up-to-date information on the different roles that polymeric micelles (commonly in the nanosize scale) can play in ocular delivery. Thus, after a general description of ocular barriers and micelles features, the attention is focused on those properties that are relevant for ophthalmic application. Finally, their efficacy in improving the ocular delivery of different classes of therapeutics (anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressant, antiglaucoma, antifungal, and antiviral drugs) are reported.

EXPERT OPINION

Although still a few, in vivo experiments have clearly demonstrated the capability of polymeric nanomicelles to overcome a variety of hurdles associated to ocular therapy, notably increasing drug bioavailability. However, there are still some very important issues to be solved, such as tolerability and stability; additionally, the role of micelles in drug uptake by the ocular tissues and their potential for the treatment of posterior eye diseases still need to be clarified/verified.