Role of palliative resection of the primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor in patients with unresectable metastatic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Decreasing utilization of surgical interventions amongst patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Since 2013, North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS) consensus-guidelines have endorsed consideration of surgical intervention for pancreatic- neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) with liver metastases.

METHODS

Patients with non-functional PNET with liver only metastases from 2010 to 2019 were identified from the National Cancer Database.

RESULTS

34.7% underwent surgical intervention (13% PNET resection, 2.1% surgical management of liver metastases (SMLM), 19.5% PNET resection ​+ ​SMLM). In multivariable analysis, government insurance, year of diagnosis>2013, increasing primary tumor size were associated with lower rate of surgical intervention. Receiving treatment at an academic center (OR 3.59, 95%CI 1.81-7.11; P ​< ​0.001) or integrated cancer network (OR 3.21, 95%CI 1.57-6.54; P ​= ​0.001) was associated with a higher rate of surgical intervention. The overall rate of surgical intervention decreased from 45.7% in 2010 to 23.0% in 2019.

CONCLUSION

Despite guideline recommendations and the suggested survival benefits, only one-third of patients underwent surgical intervention, potentially influenced by the rising utilization of systemic therapy in the past decade.

Surgery for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are derived from the islet cells of the pancreas and have been increasing in incidence. Most of these tumors are nonfunctional although some can secrete hormones and lead to hormone-specific clinical syndromes. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for localized tumors, however, surgical resection is controversial in metastatic PanNETs. This narrative review seeks to summarize the current literature surrounding surgery, specifically in the controversial area of metastatic PanNETs, review current treatment paradigms, and understand the benefits of surgery in this group of patients.

Methods

Authors searched PubMed using the terms "surgery pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor", "metastatic neuroendocrine tumor", and "liver debulking neuroendocrine tumor" from January 1990 to June 2022. Only English language publications were considered.

Key Content and Findings

There is no consensus among the leading specialty organizations regarding surgery for metastatic PanNETs. When considering surgery for metastatic PanNETs, tumor grade and morphology, location of the primary tumor, extra-hepatic or extra-abdominal disease, as well as liver tumor burden and metastatic distribution should be considered. Because the liver is the most common site of metastasis and liver failure is the most common cause of death in patients with hepatic metastases, attention is centered here on debulking and other ablative techniques. Liver transplantation is rarely used for hepatic metastases but could be beneficial in a small subset of patients. Retrospective studies have demonstrated improvement in survival and symptoms after surgery for metastatic disease, but the lack of prospective randomized control trials significantly limits analysis of surgical benefits in patients with metastatic PanNETs.

Conclusions

Surgery is the standard of care for localized PanNETs, while it remains controversial in metastatic disease. Many studies have shown a survival and symptomatic benefit to surgery and liver debulking in select groups of patients. However, most of the studies on which recommendations are based in this population are retrospective in nature and are subject to selection bias. This presents an opportunity for future investigation.

Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors of Everolimus in Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Objective The effectiveness of everolimus for the management of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs), including the G3/NEC types, remains unclear. We therefore investigated the effectiveness of the drug for the management of PNENs. Methods We analyzed the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) associated with everolimus and factors influencing the PFS and OS. Results One hundred patients were evaluated. The PFS associated with the G1/G2 types tended to be significantly longer than that associated with the G3/NEC types [hazard ratio (HR), 0.45; p=0.005]. A multivariate analysis showed that the significant factors influencing the PFS were age (<65 years old; HR, 0.44; p=0.002), grade (G1/G2; HR, 0.42; p=0.006), everolimus treatment line (≤2nd; HR, 0.55; p=0.031), and presence of treatment with metformin (yes; HR, 0.29; p=0.044). The median OS was 63.8 months. In the multivariate analysis, the significant factors influencing the OS were grade (G1/G2; HR, 0.21; p<0.001), volume of liver metastasis (≤25%; HR, 0.27; p<0.001), everolimus treatment line (≤2nd; HR, 0.27; p<0.001), and presence of primary tumor resection (yes; HR, 0.33; p=0.005). Conclusion The effectiveness of everolimus in the management of G3/NEC types and prognoses tended to be poorer than those associated with the G1/G2 types. Everolimus combined with metformin and early-line treatment with everolimus may be effective for managing advanced PNENs.

Values of debulking surgery for unresectable well-differentiated metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a comparative study

Background and objective

The value of debulking surgery for unresectable well-differentiated metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (m-PNET) remains poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of m-PNET following debulking surgery in our institute.

Methods

Patients with well-differentiated m-PNET in our hospital between February 2014 and March 2022 were collected. Clinicopathological and long-term outcomes of patients treated with radical resection, debulking surgery, and conservative therapy were compared retrospectively.

Results

Fifty-three patients with well-differentiated m-PNET were reviewed, including 47 patients with unresectable m-PNET (debulking surgery, 25; conservative therapy, 22) and 6 patients with resectable m-PNET (radical resection). Patients undergoing debulking surgery had a post-operative Clavien-Dindo ≥ III complication rate of 16.0% without mortality. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients treated with debulking surgery was significantly higher than that of those treated with conservative therapy alone (87.5% vs 37.8%, log-rank P = 0.022). Besides, the 5-year OS rate of patients treated with debulking surgery was comparable to that of patients with resectable m-PNET undergoing radical resection (87.5% vs 100%, log-rank P = 0.724).

Conclusions

Patients with unresectable well-differentiated m-PNET who underwent resection had better long-term outcomes than those who received conservative therapy alone. The 5-year OS of patients undergoing debulking surgery and radical resection were comparable. Debulking surgery could be considered for patients with unresectable well-differentiated m-PNET if no contraindication exists.

Patients with non-functional metastatic G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor benefit from palliative surgery: A 20-year single-center retrospective analysis

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) is the most common subset (31.5%) of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor in China. Based on real-world data from a single center, the present study aimed to evaluate the influence of clinical characteristics, medical treatment and surgery on the survival of non-functional metastatic G2 pNET. In total, 114 metastatic non-functional G2 pNET patients, who were treated and followed up in the Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) from 2001 until 2019, were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of death. The second endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of disease progression. Statistical data were analyzed to evaluate the effects of a clinical characteristic, medical treatment and surgery on OS and PFS. Sixty-nine (60.5%) patients were male and 87 (76.3%) were aged < 60 years. The liver was the most common metastatic organ, with a total of 84 cases (73.7%). With respect to surgery, 32 (28.1%) patients underwent radical surgery and 37 (32.5%) underwent palliative surgery. Survival analysis showed that the 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 79.36% and 70.0%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses suggested that both radical (p < .001/.003) and palliative surgery (p < .001/.002) significantly prolonged OS, as revealed by the Kaplan-Meier test (p < .001). Subgroup analysis showed that palliative resection also significantly improves the prognosis in patients with multiple liver metastases. However, the first-line systemic anti-tumor therapy option showed no statistical differences in the present study. Overall, patients with non-functional metastatic G2 pNET receiving palliative or radical surgery demonstrated significantly better survival. Prospective clinical trials are suggested to validate our findings.

[Importance of surgery in distant metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms]

The majority of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN) already present with distant metastases at diagnosis. The heterogeneity of pNEN and the broad spectrum of treatment options make adequate patient selection and an evidence-based strategy essential. In metastatic pNEN both primary resection and resection of liver metastases have been shown to improve overall survival. Surgical treatment of liver metastases can also be carried out with palliative intent, especially for symptomatic pNEN and can have a positive effect on disease-free survival and overall survival. Classical hepatectomy techniques and innovative techniques (two-stage resections, liver transplantation) are available to the surgeon. In complex growth types of liver metastases, there is increasing evidence for a combination of surgery and ablative methods. Due to a relevant risk of recurrence following liver resection, pNEN patients need to be included in multimodal treatment concepts. Current areas of interest in the treatment of metastatic pNEN are the use of adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery in G3-NEN and G3-NEC patients. The aim of this review is to give an overview on the impact of surgery in the situation of distant metastatic NEN of the pancreas.

The Role of Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors With Liver Metastases

Background

Liver metastases (LMs) are common in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) patients. Currently, the benefit of primary tumor resection (PTR) in the setting of PNET patients with liver metastases is still controversial in several guidelines.

Methods

Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to evaluate this issue. The main index of interest in our study was overall survival time.

Results

Information on 536 PNET patients with liver metastases from the SEER database was identified. A total of 214 patients (PTR group) received primary tumor resection, and more than half of them (132 patients) had synchronous LM resection. The other 322 PNET patients (non-PTR group) with liver metastases did not receive primary tumor resection. A significant survival benefit was gained from PTR when compared with non-PTR patients, both in OS (72.93 ± 2.7 vs. 36.80 ± 2.22 months) and 3- or 5-year survival rates (75.1% vs. 28.9% and 67.9% vs. 22.3%, respectively). No difference was found between PTR alone and PTR with synchronous LM resection. From univariate and multivariate analyses, younger age (<65 years) and good or moderate tumor differentiation may be more important when considering primary tumor resection. However, we found that all grades of tumor differentiation could result in a better overall survival time after primary tumor resection.

Conclusion

Our study suggested that primary tumor resection in pancreatic neuroendocrine patients with liver metastases could result in a longer survival time. Primary tumor resection with synchronous liver metastasis resection was not related to a better survival benefit. This treatment strategy may routinely be taken into consideration in these patients.

Orchestrating Treatment Modalities in Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors-Need for a Conductor

Simple Summary

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) are a heterogeneous and challenging entity, and today’s guidelines offer a variety of treatment modalities, while surgery has a clear role for patients with resectable tumors and early stages, advanced, or metastatic pNET may benefit from treatments that were evaluated in randomized controlled studies during the last year. With this review, we aim to provide an updated view on treatment options for metastatic pNET.

Abstract

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are a vast growing disease. Over 50% of these tumors are recognized at advanced stages with lymph node, liver, or distant metastasis. An ongoing controversy is the role of surgery in the metastatic setting as dedicated systemic treatments have emerged recently and shown benefits in randomized trials. Today, liver surgery is an option for advanced pNETs if the tumor has a favorable prognosis, reflected by a low to moderate proliferation index (G1 and G2). Surgery in this well-selected population may prolong progression-free and overall survival. Optimal selection of a treatment plan for an individual patient should be considered in a multidisciplinary tumor board. However, while current guidelines offer a variety of modalities, there is so far only a limited focus on the right timing. Available data is based on small case series or retrospective analyses. The focus of this review is to highlight the right time-point for surgery in the setting of the multimodal treatment of an advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

Therapeutic strategies for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: State-of-the-art and future perspectives

Although gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) have always been considered rare tumors, their incidence has risen over the past few decades. They represent a highly heterogeneous group of neoplasms with several prognostic factors, including disease stage, proliferative index (Ki67), and tumor differentiation. Most of these neoplasms express somatostatin receptors on the cell surface, a feature that has important implications in terms of prognosis, diagnosis, and therapy. Although International Guidelines propose algorithms aimed at guiding therapeutic strategies, GEP-NEN patients are still very different from one another, and the need for personalized treatment continues to increase. Radical surgery is always the best option when feasible; however, up to 80% of cases are metastatic upon diagnosis. Regarding medical treatments, as GEP-NENs are characterized by relatively long overall survival, multiple therapy lines are adopted during the lifetime of these patients, but the optimum sequence to be followed has never been clearly defined. Furthermore, although new molecular markers aimed at predicting the response to therapy, as well as prognostic scores, are currently being studied, their application is still far from being part of daily clinical practice. As they represent a complex disease, with therapeutic protocols that are not completely standardized, GEP-NENs require a multidisciplinary approach. This review will provide an overview of the available therapeutic options for GEP-NENs and attempts to clarify the possible approaches for the management of these patients and to discuss future perspectives in this field.

Localization Defines Streptozotocin/5-FU Response in Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours

INTRODUCTION

Incidence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) is on the rise. The only curative treatment is surgical resection in localized or oligo-metastatic disease. However, patients may present with locally advanced or unresectable primary tumours. So far, no conversion therapy to achieve resectability has been established, which is partly due to lack of data on primary tumour response to therapies. Here, we specifically evaluate the primary tumour response to streptozocin/5-FU in a large cohort of metastatic pNET patients.

METHODS

Five ENETS centres in Germany contributed 84 patients to the study cohort for retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

Overall response rate (ORR) in primary tumours was 34% and disease control rate (DCR) 88%. ORR was different in metastases at 44% and DCR at 70%. Partial remission in primary tumours was more frequent among those located in pancreatic tail than that in pancreatic head (49% vs. 14%, p = 0.03). Correspondingly, metastases from tumours originating from pancreatic tail responded more frequently than metastases originating from pancreatic head (88.5% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.005). The median PFS of the primary tumours was longer than that in metastases (31 months vs. 16 months; p = 0.04). Considerable downsizing of the primary tumour was rare and occurred primarily in tumours located in the pancreatic tail.

CONCLUSION

STZ/5-FU can achieve disease stabilization in a high proportion of metastatic pNET patients. In the majority of cases however it does not induce substantial downsizing of the primary tumour, thus possibly limiting its potential as conversion chemotherapy. Furthermore, the difference in response rate observed between different primary tumour locations warrants further exploration.

Resection of Primary Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor Among Patients with Non-Resected Metastases Is Associated with Improved Survival: A SEER-Medicare Analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to analyze whether primary tumor resection (PTR) among patients with stage IV gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor (GI-NET) and unresected metastases was associated with improved outcomes.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with stage IV GI-NETs were identified in the linked SEER-Medicare database from 2004 to 2015. Overall survival (OS) of patients who did versus did not undergo PTR was examined using bivariate and multivariable cox regression analysis as well as propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Among 2219 patients with metastatic GI-NETs, 632 (28.5%) underwent PTR, whereas 1587 (71.5%) did not. The majority of individuals had a NET in the pancreas (n = 969, 43.6%); the most common site of metastatic disease was the liver (n = 1064, 47.9%). Patients with stage IV small intestinal NETs most frequently underwent PTR (62.6%) followed by individuals with colon NETs (56.5%). After adjusting for all competing factors, PTR remained independently associated with improved OS (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.56-0.76). Following PSM (n = 236 per group), patients who underwent PTR had improved OS (median OS: 1.3 years vs 0.8 years, p = 0.016). While PTR of NETs originating from stomach, small intestine, colon, and pancreas was associated with improved OS, PTR of rectal NET did not yield a survival benefit.

CONCLUSION

Primary GI-NET resection was associated with a survival benefit among individuals presenting with metastatic GI-NET with unresected metastases. Resection of primary GI-NET among patients with stage IV disease and unresected metastases should only be performed in selected cases following multi-disciplinary evaluation.

Prior Resection of the Primary Tumor Prolongs Survival After Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy of Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare impact on survival after resection of primary tumors (PTs) after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

BACKGROUND

PRRT is a highly effective therapeutic option to treat locally advanced or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 889 patients with advanced NEN (G1-G3, stage IV) treated with at least 1 cycle of PRRT. In 486 of 889 patients (55%, group 1), PT had been removed before PRRT. Group 2 constituted 403 patients (45%) with no prior PT resection. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined by 68Ga SSTR-PET/CT in all patients applying RECIST and EORTC.

RESULTS

Most patients had their PT in pancreas (n = 335; 38%) and small intestine (n = 284; 32%). Both groups received a mean of 4 cycles of PRRT (P = 0.835) with a mean cumulative administered radioactivity of 21.6 ± 11.7 versus 22.2 ± 11.2 GBq (P = 0.407). Median OS in group 1 was 134.0 months [confidence interval (CI): 118-147], whereas OS in group 2 was 67.0 months (CI: 60-80; hazard ratio 2.79); P < 0.001. Likewise, the median progression-free survival after first PRRT was longer in group 1 with 18.0 (CI: 15-20) months as compared to group 2 with 14.0 (CI: 15-18; hazard ratio 1.21) months; P = 0.012.

CONCLUSIONS

A previous resection of the PT before PRRT provides a significant survival benefit in patients with NENs stage IV.

Evaluation of Outcomes Following Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

IMPORTANCE

Although outcome of surgical resection of liver metastases from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) has been extensively studied, little is known about surgery for locally advanced PNETs; it was listed recently by the European neuroendocrine tumor society as a major unmet need.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome of patients who underwent surgery for locally aggressive PNETs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective single-center case series reviewed consecutive patients who underwent resection of T3/T4 PNETs at a single academic institution. Data collection occurred from 2003 to 2018. Data analysis was performed in August 2019.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Disease-free survival (primary outcome) and overall mortality (secondary outcome) were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Recurrence risk (secondary outcome, defined as identification of tumor recurrence on imaging) was assessed with Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

In this case series, 99 patients with locally advanced nondistant metastatic PNET (56 men [57%]) with a mean (SEM) age of 57.0 (1.4) years and a mean (SEM) follow-up of 5.3 (0.1) years underwent surgically aggressive resections. Of those, 4 patients (4%) underwent preoperative neoadjuvant treatment (including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and chemotherapy); 18 patients (18%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, 68 patients (69%) had distal or subtotal pancreatic resection, 10 patients (10%) had total resection, and 3 patients (3%) had other pancreatic procedures. Additional organ resection was required in 86 patients (87%): spleen (71 patients [71%]), major blood vessel (17 patients [17%]), bowel (2 patients [2%]), stomach (4 patients [4%]), and kidney (2 patients [2%]). Five-year disease-free survival was 61% (61 patients) and 5-year overall survival was 91% (91 patients). Of those living, 75 patients (76%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of less than or equal to 1 at last followup. Lymph node involvement (HR, 7.66; 95% CI, 2.78-21.12; P < .001), additional organ resected (HR, 6.15; 95% CI, 1.61-23.55; P = .008), and male sex (HR, 3.77; 95% CI, 1.68-8.97; P = .003) were associated with increased risk of recurrence. Functional tumors had a lower risk of recurrence (HR, 0.23; CI, 0.06-0.89; P = .03). Required resection of blood vessels was not associated with a significant increase recurrence risk.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this case series, positive lymph node involvement and resection of organs with tumor involvement were associated with an increased recurrence risk. These subgroups may require adjuvant systemic treatment. These findings suggest that patients with locally advanced PNETs who undergo surgical resection have excellent disease-free and overall survival.

[Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms-Heterogeneity, management and perspectives of treatment and research]

The term neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) encompasses a molecularly and biologically very heterogeneous group of tumors, which have in common their origin in neuroendocrine cells. The also very heterogeneous subgroup of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN) is the best classified and investigated group. This article provides a systematic review of the current classification, diagnostics and treatment options of GEP-NEN. In order to achieve a better overview, it was consciously decided not to use an approach based on the primary localization. Instead, a thematic organization according to classification, clinical phenotype, diagnostics and treatment was chosen.

Surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that vary in their clinical presentation, behavior and prognosis. The most common site of metastasis is the liver. Surgical resection of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is thought to afford the best long-term outcomes when feasible. Initial preoperative workup should include surveillance for carcinoid syndrome, screening for evidence of liver insufficiency, and performance of imaging specific to neuroendocrine tumors such as a somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography scan. Standard surgical principles apply to hepatic surgery for NELM, namely prioritizing low central venous pressure anesthesia, minimizing blood loss, knowledge of liver anatomy, generous use of intraoperative ultrasound, as well as safe parenchymal transection techniques and practices to avoid bile leakage. Knowledge of established prognostic factors may assist with patient selection, which is important for optimizing short- and long-term outcomes of hepatic resection. Adjunct therapies such as concomitant liver ablation are used frequently and are generally safe when used appropriately. For patients with synchronous resectable NELM, resection of the primary either in a staged or combined fashion is recommended. Primary tumor resection in the setting of unresectable metastatic disease is more controversial, however generally recommended if morbidity is acceptable. For patients who are not surgical candidates, due to either patient performance status or burden of liver disease, several liver-directed therapies such as transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization are available to assist with locoregional control, extend progression-free survival (PFS), and improve symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. Multiple systemic therapy options exist for patients with metastatic PNET which are often prioritized for those patients with advanced or progressive disease. A systematic approach in a multi-disciplinary setting is likely to result in the best long-term outcomes for patients with pancreatic NELM. Ongoing research is needed to determine the optimal patient selection for hepatic surgery as well as the ideal treatment sequencing for those patients with NELM.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Paper on the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This manuscript is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from July 19 to 20, 2018. The group reviewed a series of questions of specific interest to surgeons taking care of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and for each, the available literature was reviewed. What follows are these reviews for each question followed by recommendations of the panel.

Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies

Introduction: Recent advances in diagnostic modalities and therapeutic agents have raised the importance of prognostic factors in predicting overall survival, as well as predictive factors for surgical outcomes, in tailoring therapeutic strategies of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs).Areas covered: Numerous recent studies of panNEN patients report the prognostic values of a number of clinically related factors (clinical, laboratory, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors on long-term survival. In addition, an increasing number of studies showed the usefulness of various factors, specifically biomarkers and molecular makers, in predicting recurrence and mortality related to surgical treatment. Recent findings (from the last 3 years) in each of these areas, as well as recent controversies, are reviewed.Expert commentary: The clinical importance of prognostic and predictive factors for panNENs is markedly increased for both overall outcome and post resection, as a result of recent advances in all aspects of the diagnosis, management and treatment of panNENs. Despite the proven prognostic utility of routinely used tumor grading/classification and staging systems, further studies are required to establish these novel prognostic factors to support their routine clinical use.

Survival comparison between primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and primary pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and the analysis on prognosis-related factors

BACKGROUND

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PHNENs) are extremely rare and few articles have compared the prognosis of PHNENs with other neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). This study aimed to investigate the different prognosis between PHNENs and pancreatic NEN (PanNENs) and evaluate the relevant prognosis-related factors.

METHODS

From January 2012 to October 2016, a total of 44 NENs patients were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the primary tumor location which were named group PHNENs (liver; n = 12) and group PanNENs (pancreas; n = 32). Demographic, clinical characteristics and survival data were compared between the two groups with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. Prognostic factors were analyzed using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

The overall survival of group PHNENs and group PanNENs were 25.4 ± 6.7 months and 39.8 ± 3.7 months, respectively (P = 0.037). The cumulative survival of group PanNENs was significantly higher than that of group PHNENs (P = 0.029). Univariate analysis revealed that sex, albumin, total bilirubin, total bile acid, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, α-fetoprotein and carbohydrate antigen 19-9, histological types, treatments and primary tumor site were the prognostic factors. Further multivariate analysis indicated that albumin (P = 0.008), histological types NEC (P = 0.035) and treatments (P = 0.005) were the independent prognostic factors. Based on the histological types, the cumulative survival of patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor was significant higher than that of patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma in group PHNENs (P = 0.022), but not in group PanNENs (P > 0.05). According to the different treatments, patients who received surgery had significantly higher cumulative survival than those with conservative treatment in both groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PHNENs have lower survival compared to PanNENs. Histological types and treatments affect the prognosis. Surgical resection still remains the first line of treatment for resectable lesions and can significantly improve the survival.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours

Background:

The incidence of pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (pNETs) has increased considerably in the last few decades. The characteristic features of this tumour and the development of new investigative and therapeutic methods had a great impact on its management.

Objective:

The aim of this review is to investigate the outcome of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Methods:

A comprehensive literature search strategy was used based on two databases (SCOPUS, and PubMed). We considered all studies published in English, evaluating the use of PRRT (177Luteciuim- DOTA-conjugated peptides and 90Yetrium- DOTA- conjugated peptides) in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours as a standalone entity or as a subgroup within the wider category of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (GEP NETs).

Results:

PRRT was found to be an effective treatment modality as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies in the treatment of non-operable and metastatic pNETs where other options are limited. Complete response was reported to be between 2-6% while partial response was achieved in up to 60% of cases. Survival analysis was also impressive. Progression Free Survival (PFS) reached a mean of 34 months and Overall Survival (OS) of 53 months. PRRT also proved to improve patients’ Quality of Life (QoL). Acute and sub-acute side effects like nephrotoxicity and haematotoxicity are usually mild and reversible.

Conclusion:

PRRT is well tolerated and effective treatment option for non-operable and/or metastatic pNETs. Side effects are usually mild and reversible. Larger randomized controlled trails need to be done to compare PRRT with other treatment modalities and to provide more detailed guidelines regarding patient selections, the choice of PRRT, follow up and response assessment to maximum potential benefit.

Competing risks and cause-specific mortality in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Currently, there are no competing risk analyses of cause-specific mortality in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We estimated a cumulative incidence function for cause-specific mortality. The first nomogram for predicting cause-specific mortality was constructed using a proportional subdistribution hazard model, validated using bootstrap cross-validation, and evaluated with decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

Sex, age, positive lymph node status, metastasis, surveillance, epidemiology, and end results historic stage, grade, and surgery strongly predicted cause-specific mortality. The discrimination performance of Fine-Gray models was evaluated using the c-index, which was 0.864. In addition, the calibration plot of the developed nomogram demonstrated good concordance between the predicted and actual outcomes. Decision curve analysis yielded a range of threshold probabilities (0.014-0.779) at which the clinical net benefit of the risk model was greater than that in hypothetical all-screening or no-screening scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Our nomogram allows selection of a patient population at high risk for cancer-specific mortality and thus facilitates the design of prevention trials for the affected population.

Treatment of Liver Metastases from Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Strong evidence comparing different treatment options for liver metastases (LM) arising from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) is lacking. The aim of this study was to determine which intervention for LMs from GEP-NETs shows the longest overall survival (OS). A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library in February 2018. Studies reporting on patients with LMs of any grade of sporadic GEP-NET comparing two intervention groups were included for analysis. Meta-analyses were performed where possible. Eleven studies, with a total of 1108, patients were included; 662 patients had LM from pancreatic NETs (pNET), 164 patients from small-bowel NETs (SB-NET) and 282 patients of unknown origin. Improved 5-year OS was observed for surgery vs. chemotherapy (OR .05 95% CI [0.01, 0.21] p < 0.0001), for surgery vs. embolization (OR 0.18 95% CI [0.05, 0.61] p = 0.006) and for LM resection vs. no LM resection (OR 0.15 95% CI [0.05, 0.42] p = 0.0003). This is the largest meta-analysis performed comparing different interventions for LMs from GEP-NETs. Despite the high risk of bias and heterogeneity of data, surgical resection for all tumour grades results in the longest overall survival. Chemotherapy and embolization should be considered as an alternative in case surgery is not feasible.

Surgical resection of the primary tumor leads to prolonged survival in metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Palliative resection of the primary tumor for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (pNEC) patients is not recommended because of the poor prognosis compared to that of patients with well-differentiated, lower grade tumors. However, the published data supporting this recommendation regarding pNEC are limited. In the present study, we assessed whether palliative primary tumor resection in stage IV pNEC patients affects survival and identified other factors that affect survival in these patients.

METHODS

We collected data from stage IV pNEC patients registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1988 and 2014. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients who did or did not undergo primary tumor resection.

RESULTS

We identified 350 patients with metastatic, poorly differentiated, and undifferentiated pNEC. A total of 14.3% (50/350) of patients underwent primary tumor resection. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that primary tumor resection provided a significant benefit for both OS and CSS in stage IV pNEC patients. Additionally, chemotherapy and the presence of the primary tumor in the pancreatic tail were independent positive prognostic factors for metastatic pNEC patients in the multivariate Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that chemotherapy, location of the primary tumor in the pancreatic tail, and, most importantly, surgical removal of the primary tumor are associated with prolonged survival in stage IV pNEC patients.

Treatment options for PNET liver metastases: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are rare pancreatic neoplasms. About 40-80% of patients with PNET are metastatic at presentation, usually involving the liver (40-93%). Liver metastasis represents the most significant prognostic factor. The aim of this study is to present an up-to-date review of treatment options for patients with liver metastases from PNETs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed database to identify all pertinent studies published up to May 2018.

RESULTS

The literature search evaluated all the therapeutic options for patients with liver metastases of PNETs, including surgical treatment, loco-regional therapies, and pharmacological treatment. All the different treatment options showed particular indications in different presentations of liver metastases of PNET. Surgery remains the only potentially curative therapeutic option in patients with PNETs and resectable liver metastases, even if relapse rates are high. Efficacy of medical treatment has increased with advances in targeted therapies, such as everolimus and sunitinib, and the introduction of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. Several techniques for loco-regional control of metastases are available, including chemo- or radioembolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of patients with PNET metastases should be multidisciplinary and must be personalized according to the features of individual patients and tumors.