Preference for a prefilled syringe or an auto-injection device for delivering golimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a randomized crossover study

Quantifying Patient Capabilities and Setting the Stage for Future Development: Insights from a Sensor-Augmented Simulated Use Study with Pen Injectors

Background

While formative and summative usability testing is essential to confirm safe and effective product use, it may not be sufficient to comprehensively understand user capabilities and limitations in device interactions. Therefore, this research aims to quantify user handling forces for different device handling steps of pen injectors through sensor-augmented simulated use studies.

Research Design and methods

The study involved 46 participants who were divided into two groups: a healthy control group and a group of users with dexterity impairments. All participants were instructed to perform simulated handling steps using non-functional dummy devices equipped with force and torque sensors. Each handling step was performed twice: first at what participants considered a comfortable force level and then at their maximum force. The study then analyzed force data to investigate the impact of user characteristics and device geometry on force exertion during the different handling steps.

Results

The study demonstrates differences in the perceived comfortable and maximum force levels between the control and patient groups. These force levels decrease slightly with the user's age and level of dexterity impairment. Furthermore, the forces applied by the users are dependent on the geometry of the device and the holding pattern.

Conclusion

The results highlight the significance of sensor-augmented simulated use studies as a tool for providing quantitative insights into users' ability to exert force while handling self-injection devices. These data offer comprehensive insights that inform the definition of performance requirements and specifications for injection device design, thereby supporting the advancement of future self-injection devices.

Factors influencing the acceptability of different devices for subcutaneous drug delivery: a cross-sectional observational study from the patient's point of view

BACKGROUND

In recent years, an increasing number of patient-reported outcome assessment tools (PROs) have been developed specifically to ascertain patients' perceptions of different drug treatments. Among them, the injection process has been analysed, especially in patients chronically treated with chronic biological therapies. One of the main advantages of most current biological therapies is the possibility to self-administer medication at home through the use of a variety of devices, including prefilled syringes (PFS) and prefilled pens (PFP).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to conduct qualitative research to assess the degree of preference between the different pharmaceutical forms PFS and PFP.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional observational study in patients on biological drug therapy through the compilation of a web-based questionnaire at the time of routine delivery of biological therapy. Questions regarding primary diagnosis, adherence to therapy, the preferred pharmaceutical form and the main reason for preference among five possibilities already reported in the scientific literature were included.

RESULTS

During the study period, data were collected from 111 patients and 68 (58%) indicated PFP as their preference. From the analysis of reasons that led a patient to choose one device over another, PFSs are chosen mainly out of habit (n=13 (28.3%) PFS vs n=2 (3.1%) PFP) while PFPs are chosen to avoid needle vision (n=15 (23.1%) PFP vs n=1 (2.2%) PFS). Both differences were found to be statistically significant (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

As biological subcutaneous drugs are increasingly prescribed for a wide variety of long-term therapies, further research focused on identifying patient factors which may enhance adherence to treatment will become even more valuable.

Patient Experience with the SensoReady® Autoinjector Pen versus a Comparator Device: Results from a Canadian Patient Survey in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Crohn´s Disease

Purpose

Medication delivery device design impacts treatment satisfaction, adherence, and compliance in patients receiving biologics. This survey assessed autoinjector attributes that are important to patients, and assessed patient perceptions and preferences between an adalimumab biosimilar autoinjector (Hyrimoz® SensoReady® Pen [SDZ-ADL pen]) and the reference adalimumab autoinjector (Humira® Pen [ref-ADL pen]) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or Crohn's disease (CD) in Canada.

Patients and Methods

In this survey, adult patients were recruited for web-assisted telephone interviews. Patients had ≥ 3 months' experience with the ref-ADL pen and 1-12 months' experience with the SDZ-ADL pen.

Results

The survey included 120 patients with RA (n = 32) or CD (n = 88). Mean experience with the ref-ADL pen was 7 years for RA or 5 years for CD vs 9 months with the SDZ-ADL pen. The most important autoinjector attributes were the ability to use the pen independently and the ease and simplicity of self-injection. When comparing the two autoinjectors, patients significantly preferred the SDZ-ADL pen over the ref-ADL pen for nearly every attribute evaluated, with the greatest differences reported for visual and audible feedback mechanisms, ease of self-injection, and ability to use the device independently. Overall, 82% of patients preferred the SDZ-ADL pen over the ref-ADL pen, with buttonless activation and less injection pain being the main drivers for this preference.

Conclusion

Patients with RA or CD indicated a preference for the SDZ-ADL pen over the ref-ADL pen, independent of the duration of use of the pen. The preference for a biosimilar device within 1 year of switching provides reassurance of rapid patient acceptance of biosimilars and may simplify the switching process. These results confirm the importance of ensuring autoinjector design supports independent self-administration of medication and align with previous data showing high patient satisfaction with the SDZ-ADL pen.

Pharmaceutical and biotech industry perspectives on optimizing patient experience and treatment adherence through subcutaneous drug delivery design

Subcutaneous (SC) drug delivery can be a safe, effective alternative to the traditional intravenous route of administration, potentially offering notable advantages for both patients and healthcare providers. The SC Drug Development & Delivery Consortium convened in 2018 to raise awareness of industry challenges to advance the development of patient-centric SC drug delivery strategies. The SC Consortium identified better understanding of patient preferences and perspectives as necessary to optimize SC product design attributes and help guide design decisions during SC product development. This manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of patient-centric factors for consideration in the SC drug delivery design and development process with the aim of establishing a foundation of existing knowledge for patient experiences related to SC drug delivery. This overview is informed by the outcomes of a multi-step survey of Consortium members and key pharmaceutical stakeholders. Framed in the context of the patient's treatment journey, the survey findings offer future perspectives to fill data gaps to advance patient-centric SC drug delivery.

Relevance of Adalimumab Product Attributes to Patient Experience in the Biosimilar Era: A Narrative Review

Adalimumab (ADL, Humira®, reference product), an anti-TNF-α biologic, has transformed the treatment of chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. However, the high cost of ADL therapy has driven the development of more affordable ADL biosimilars, agents with no clinically meaningful differences from the reference product. This review summarizes the product attributes of reference ADL and the nine ADL biosimilars approved and available in the USA in relation to patient experience of injection-site pain (ISP). Product formulation, delivery volume and device features (e.g., type and needle gauge size) influence patient experience of ISP with potential clinical consequences. Citrate-free formulations generally cause less ISP; injection volumes of > 1.5 ml may be associated with increased ISP. Reference ADL and all ADL biosimilars offer a citrate-free formulation, and reference ADL and four ADL biosimilars offer a high-concentration solution that allows a smaller injection volume. All available ADL products are injected subcutaneously using either a pre-filled pen (PFP) or pre-filled syringe (PFS). Patients prefer the PFP, but the PFS permits better control over the speed and duration of injection. Smaller (29-gauge) needle outer diameter is associated with less ISP; reference ADL and seven ADL biosimilars offer a device with a 29-gauge needle. In the USA, an approved biosimilar can be designated "interchangeable," allowing pharmacy-level substitution, where state law permits. In the USA, two ADL biosimilars have received interchangeability designation; others are seeking interchangeability designation from the Food and Drug Administration (n = 2), are being evaluated in clinical studies to support interchangeability (n = 2), or do not have/are not seeking interchangeability designation (n = 3). Product-related attributes influence patient experience of ISP caused by subcutaneous ADL injection. Reference ADL and ADL biosimilar products differ in their attributes, so discussion with patients about treatment options is essential to optimize adherence and outcomes.

Biologic pen injector waste: lessons from the PenCycle scheme

Biologic medicines have revolutionized the management of dermatological conditions such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis and their use is likely to not only continue but grow given their success. Most of these medications are delivered through self-injector systems, commonly a prefilled pen made of high-quality plastics that will be disposed of after one use. The success of Novo Nordisk's PenCycle scheme in the UK has offered encouragement that salvaging much of this plastic and recycling it for other purposes is a viable route to significantly reducing the amount of plastic disposed of and, in the context of the global climate crisis, should be considered by all stakeholders.

International Survey to Evaluate Current Options for Subcutaneous Injection of Methotrexate (MTX) and a New Button-Free MTX Autoinjector

Purpose

Prefilled syringes (PFS) and various types of pens are available for subcutaneous injection of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or moderate to severe psoriasis. A new MTX pen with modernized button-free autoinjection technology was developed as a successor to a button-activated pen (metoject®/metex® PEN). To assess the needs of users and the relevance of features of the new MTX autoinjector an international online survey was performed.

Methods

A structured questionnaire was distributed to physicians, nurses and patients in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. Participants received illustrations and information about features of the new MTX autoinjector.

Results

In total, 189 rheumatologists, 111 dermatologists, 90 nurses, and 180 patients answered the questions. Specific reasons for a preference for the use of MTX pens over PFS could predominantly be assigned to the categories "dosing/administration" and "ease of use". The first impression of the new MTX autoinjector was positive in 82% of physicians, 87% of nurses, and 76% of patients, respectively. The four most important features of the new MTX autoinjector were 2-step autoinjector mechanism (receiving a mean 14.1 to 18.1 chips of a total of 100 chips), small injection volume (9.7 to 11.7 chips), 10 different doses for dose flexibility (8.0 to 13.2 chips), and short injection time below 5 seconds (8.5 to 11.1 chips).

Conclusion

Arguments for the use of MTX pens as opposed to PFS predominantly refer to dosing/administration and ease of use. The new button-free MTX autoinjector combines a number of advantageous features identified by the international survey.

A Randomized, Open-Label Study Conducted to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of Pegfilgrastim-cbqv On-Body Injector Versus Prefilled Syringe in Healthy Male Participants

INTRODUCTION

To help prevent febrile neutropenia, pegfilgrastim-cbqv (UDENYCA®; Coherus BioSciences), a pegfilgrastim (NEULASTA®; Amgen) biosimilar, is administered 24-96 h after myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Delivery of pegfilgrastim-cbqv using an on-body injector (OBI) provides an alternative method of administration, affording options in drug delivery. This study aimed to establish pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) bioequivalence and assess the safety of pegfilgrastim-cbqv administered using an OBI compared with a prefilled syringe (PFS).

METHODS

In this open-label, two-period crossover study, healthy adult male participants (N = 189) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pegfilgrastim-cbqv 6 mg subcutaneously using an OBI (n = 92) or a PFS (n = 95) in period 1 and then an injection via the other method in period 2. Primary PK end points were area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and maximum plasma concentration. Secondary PD end points, safety, immunogenicity, and tolerability were also assessed.

RESULTS

The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios for the PK and PD end points fell within the predetermined range (80-125%), indicating PK and PD bioequivalence between pegfilgrastim-cbqv OBI and pegfilgrastim-cbqv PFS. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 87.8% and 75.8% of participants in the OBI and PFS groups, respectively. Most TEAEs were musculoskeletal effects. The most common OBI-related TEAE was injection site erythema (31.7%), which was mild, transient, and self-limiting. The incidence of treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies (ADAs) was similar between the OBI and PFS. ADAs had no apparent impact on PK, PD, or safety. Neutralizing antibodies were not detected in any participant.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the study showed PK and PD bioequivalence of pegfilgrastim-cbqv administered using OBI compared with PFS. OBI and PFS administration had similar safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity profiles. No unexpected safety signals were identified. Graphical Abstract available for this article.

Framework for creating a qualified medical device development tool of autoinjectors

Objectives

Autoinjectors are pivotal for precise self-administration of medications across a wide range of medical conditions. Nevertheless, the absence of a dedicated Medical Device Development Tool (MDDT) for autoinjectors represents a gap that may result in variations in the quality and regulatory compliance of autoinjectors as components of combination products. This research aim is to utilize the recently introduced Primary Functions outlined in ISO 11608-1:2022 with the title "Needle-based injection systems for medical use. Requirements and test methods. Part 1: Needle-based injection systems" to create a comprehensive MDDT framework tailored specifically for autoinjectors.

Methods

To support the creation of the framework, the analysis of the FDA MDDTs that were already approved, FDA's design controls regulations, FDA's guidance related to autoinjectors, and the Primary functions outlined in ISO 11608-1:2022 were utilized.

Results

The research identifies the Primary Functions in autoinjector to be Holding Force, Cap Removal Force, Activation Force, Extended Needle Length, Injection Time, Dose Accuracy and Needle Guard Lockout. Leveraging these Primary Functions and the FDA's MDDT approach, the research aims to bridge the gap by proposing a structured framework for the development of a specific MDDT tailored to autoinjectors.

Conclusion

This study presents a MDDT framework tailored to the development of autoinjectors for drug delivery. This framework provides a structured methodology to support predictability and effectiveness of the autoinjector development and support regulatory review process, thereby expediting FDA approval for autoinjectors as part of combination product.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Bioequivalence of Pegfilgrastim-cbqv Delivered via a Prefilled Autoinjector and Prefilled Syringe in Healthy Male Participants

INTRODUCTION

Pegfilgrastim-cbqv (UDENYCA®; Coherus BioSciences, Redwood City, CA, USA) is a pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) biosimilar approved for administration by prefilled syringe (PFS). The recently approved pegfilgrastim-cbqv prefilled autoinjector (AI) was developed as another method of self-administration and to aid in-office use, providing flexibility in drug delivery. The objectives of the study were to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to determine bioequivalence of the prefilled AI and the PFS for administration of pegfilgrastim-cbqv and to assess the safety profile of the prefilled AI.

METHODS

During this open-label, two-period crossover study, healthy adult males (N = 155) were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive a subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim-cbqv using a prefilled AI (n = 76) or a PFS (n = 79) in period 1. During period 2, participants received an injection using the other method. Primary PK and secondary PD parameters were calculated to assess the bioequivalence of the treatment as administered by the two delivery methods. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed.

RESULTS

The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the PK and PD parameters were within the required range (80-125%), demonstrating bioequivalence between the pegfilgrastim-cbqv prefilled AI and PFS. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 75% and 74.1% of participants in the prefilled AI and PFS groups, respectively. The most common TEAEs in both treatment groups were myalgia, bone pain, and headache. AI-device-related TEAEs were injection site pain (1.4%) and injection site bruising (0.7%). The incidence of antidrug antibodies and neutralizing antibodies was low and was similar in both treatment sequences.

CONCLUSIONS

The bioequivalence of pegfilgrastim-cbqv administered using a prefilled AI and a PFS was established. The safety, including immunogenicity profiles, of pegfilgrastim-cbqv administered using the prefilled AI and the PFS were similar, with no new safety findings.

Stability of Monoclonal Antibodies as Solid Formulation for Auto-Injectors: A Pilot Study

Drug adherence is a significant medical issue, often responsible for sub-optimal outcomes during the treatment of chronic diseases such as rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis. Monoclonal antibodies (which are exclusively given parenterally) have been proven to be an effective treatment in these cases. The use of auto-injectors is an effective strategy to improve drug adherence in parenteral treatments since these pen-like devices offer less discomfort and increased user-friendliness over conventional syringe-based delivery. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of including a monoclonal antibody as a solid formulation inside an auto-injector pen. Specifically, the objective was to evaluate the drug stability after a concentration (to reduce the amount of solvent and space needed) and freeze-drying procedure. A preliminary screening of excipients to improve stability was also performed. The nano-DSC results showed that mannitol improved the stability of the concentrated, freeze-dried antibody in comparison to its counterpart without it. However, a small instability of the CH2 domain was still found for mannitol samples, which will warrant further investigation. The present results serve as a stepping stone towards advancing future drug delivery systems that will ultimately improve the patient experience and associated drug adherence.

Design Development of the SMARTCLIC®/CLICWISE® Injection Device for Self-Administered Subcutaneous Therapies: Findings from Usability and Human Factor Studies

INTRODUCTION

An easy-to-use, multiuse, single-patient, electromechanical autoinjector, the SMARTCLIC®/CLICWISE® injection device, was recently developed to improve the self-administration options available to patients with chronic inflammatory disease treated with biologic agents. An extensive series of studies were conducted to guide the design and development of this device and to ensure its safety and effectiveness.

METHODS

Participants in two user preference studies and three formative human factor (HF) studies evaluated evolving iterations of the autoinjector device, dose dispenser cartridge, graphical user interface, and informational materials; participants in a summative HF test subsequently assessed the final proposed commercially representative product. In the user preference studies, rheumatologists and patients with chronic inflammatory disease, interviewed online and in-person, provided feedback on the design and functionality of four prototypes. In the HF studies, the safety, effectiveness, and usability of adapted prototypes were assessed under simulated-use conditions by patients with chronic inflammatory disease, caregivers, and healthcare professionals (HCPs). The safety and effectiveness of the final refined device and system were confirmed in a summative HF test by patients and HCPs in simulated-use scenarios.

RESULTS

Rheumatologists (n = 204) and patients (n = 39) interviewed in the two user preference studies provided feedback on the device size, feature ergonomics, and usability that guided prototype development in the subsequent formative HF studies. Observations from patients, caregivers, and HCPs (n = 55) participating in the latter studies yielded additional critical design revisions that culminated in development of the final device and system. Of 106 injection simulations conducted in the summative HF test, all resulted in successful medication delivery, and no potential harms were associated with injection-related use events.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this research facilitated development of the SmartClic/ClicWise autoinjector device and demonstrated that it could be used safely and effectively by participants representative of the intended-use population of patients, lay caregivers, and HCPs.

Customer-centric product presentations for monoclonal antibodies

Delivering customer-centric product presentations for biotherapeutics, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), represents a long-standing and paramount area of engagement for pharmaceutical scientists. Activities include improving experience with the dosing procedure, reducing drug administration-related expenditures, and ultimately shifting parenteral treatments outside of a controlled healthcare institutional setting. In times of increasingly cost-constrained markets and reinforced with the coronavirus pandemic, this discipline of "Product Optimization" in healthcare has gained momentum and changed from a nice-to-have into a must. This review summarizes latest trends in the healthcare ecosystem that inform key strategies for developing customer-centric products, including the availability of a wider array of sustainable drug delivery options and treatment management plans that support dosing in a flexible care setting. Three disease area archetypes with varying degree of implementation of customer-centric concepts are introduced to highlight relevant market differences and similarities. Namely, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, and oncology have been chosen due to differences in the availability of subcutaneously dosed and ready-to-use self-administration products for mAb medicines and their follow-on biologics. Different launch scenarios are described from a manufacturer's perspective highlighting the necessity of platform approaches. To unfold the full potential of customer-centric care, value-based healthcare provider reimbursement schemes that incentivize the efficiency of care need to be broadly implemented.

Mepolizumab prefilled syringe for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma: focus on the pediatric population

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophil-targeted therapy with mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma has significantly improved asthma control and patient quality of life though administration in children had been restricted to health-care provider reconstitution of a lyophilized powder into a solution with in-clinic administration until recently. Here, we profile the newly FDA-approved use of mepolizumab as a prefilled syringe for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma in children aged 6-11 years old, allowing for home administration.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted on PubMed using keywords such as mepolizumab, severe asthma, eosinophils, IL-5, anti-IL-5, children, pediatric, prefilled syringe, and home administration in several combinations. Published literature through July 2022 including clinical trials and prescribing information for mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma, particularly for use in children and as administration as a prefilled syringe, is reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Asthma affects a significant number of children worldwide, and having efficacious, tolerable, targeted precision therapies for this population is crucial. Mepolizumab remains the only targeted anti-IL-5 therapy approved for pediatric asthma down to 6 years of age. The innovation of the prefilled syringe will enable home administration, which would decrease the burden of treatment, and could potentially increase adoption of therapy.

Management of Uncontrolled Asthma: A Framework for Novel and Legacy Biologic Treatments

Asthma continues to be a complex respiratory disease to control for many despite optimal standard inhaler therapy. The increased dependence on steroid-sparing biologic treatments in the 21^st century has created a dilemma between identifying the patient’s intrinsic biomarkers and their “life markers.” With Tezepelumab being the most recent FDA-approved biologic for asthma, it is even more critical for asthma specialists to better understand and establish a framework to determine which biologic would work best for their patients. While cost and payor approvals limit access to certain asthma biologics, medical decisions on which biologic to select should be centered around shared decision-making, the rationale for biologic initiation, and critical biologic education to help achieve successful asthma control.

The current paradigm for biologic initiation: A confirmatory quantitative analysis of self-injection training practices

BACKGROUND

Self-injected biologic therapies have gained significant prevalence across numerous therapeutic areas. A lack of specific guidance on best practices may lead to inadequate biologic initiation and training. We previously conducted a small-sample, qualitative analysis designed to identify gaps in self-injection training.

METHODS

A total of 277 HCPs performing routine biologic initiation and 264 patients currently self-injecting biologics completed this quantitative study remotely using an online survey. The primary objective was to validate previous qualitative findings and firmly characterize the current paradigm. As an exploratory objective, the study examined associations that may exist between training experiences and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Most patients (91.7%) reported receiving formal self-injection training, commonly conducted over one or two sessions. The mean overall training time reported was 37.8 and 30.4 minutes by patients and HCPs, respectively. Over one-third of patients reported lacking confidence that they could correctly self-inject during the first 6 months of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Current training practices may not be adequate to prepare patients to start their therapies. Considerable attention must be paid to providing patients with multiple opportunities for training sessions, training devices, and medical information for home access. Further studies should prospectively examine the impact of training techniques on patient-reported outcomes.

Subcutaneous golimumab to treat a biological naïve chronically active ulcerative colitis child. A case report

Introduction

Ulcerative colitis is an immune-mediated disease that carries challenges in pediatrics since it's frequently severe and extensive. Current pediatric ulcerative colitis guidelines offer a weak recommendation regarding the usage and the dosage of golimumab in low-weight children. We present a case of an off-label, unrecommended dose of subcutaneous golimumab to treat low-weight chronic active ulcerative colitis child.

Case presentation

A 10-year-old Syrian girl, anti-TNF naïve, chronically active ulcerative colitis was weighs 25 kg, standing 142 cm tall, body surface area (BSA) of 0.993 m², past medications included oral prednisone and mesalamine, no prior surgery. We used golimumab 200 mg, 100 mg at weeks 0, 2 as induction, then 50 mg every four weeks for about two years.

Clinical discussion

The recommendation regarding the use of subcutaneous golimumab in pediatrics is weak since is based on an open-label pharmacokinetics cohort. It is available in 100 mg/1 ml, 50 mg/0.5 ml as a smart SmartJect, or in 45 mg/0.45 ml in VarioJect which provides golimumab from 10 mg to 45 mg in increments of 5 mg/0.05 ml. Golimumab Varioject is in short supply, and unavailable in several regions including Syria. The recommended golimumab maintenance dose always requires two injectors, which adds another burden.

Conclusion

This case demonstrated that golimumab 200 mg, 100 mg at week 0, 2 as an induction then 50 mg every four weeks was efficacious and safe in<45 kg children, there were no side effects or adverse events during two years therapy period.

•

Golimumab,a human IgG1 TNFα antagonist that may be the first biological treatment choice in both naive and biological expert active chronic pediatric ulcerative colitis.

•

Subcutaneous golimumab at doses of 200 mg 100 mg at week 0, 2, then 50 mg every four weeks is both safe and effective in the treatment of low-weight active chronic pediatric ulcerative colitis.

•

The 60 mg SC golimumab maintenance will require two injectors, at least one of them varioject which is in short supply.

Evaluating Use of the Octreotide Acetate Pen Injector in a Summative Human Factors Validation Study

OBJECTIVE

Subcutaneous injections of octreotide acetate require chronic administration by healthcare providers (HCPs). We aimed to validate the safe and effective use of the octreotide acetate pen injector, its labelling, and instructions for use (IFU) by patients, caregivers, and HCPs and mitigation of use-related risks.

METHODS

This summative human factors validation study enrolled adults with neuroendocrine tumors and related diarrhea or flushing, adult caregivers, and HCPs. Prior to simulated use, participants self-familiarized as they desired. Each participant was assigned 1 injection site for administration into an injection pad. The first of 2 unaided injections assessed first use and required priming; the second assessed routine use and dose change. Participants gave subjective feedback after each injection and completed knowledge probes and reading comprehension questions after the second injection.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 45 participants (15/group). Forty-two participants completed the first injection successfully by administering the dose correctly. Three participants did not successfully dose; 3 failed to prime the pen and 1 also failed to dial the correct dose. Unrelated to dosing, 2 participants failed to remove the needle after injection. Forty-four participants completed the second injection-1 participant failed to dial the correct dose. No other errors were observed. Overall success rates on knowledge probes and reading comprehension questions were 99.1% and 99.6%, respectively. All participants found the IFU easy to follow and understand.

CONCLUSION

The octreotide acetate pen injector, labelling, and IFU enabled intended users to administer subcutaneous octreotide safely and effectively. The residual risks of use are low and acceptable.

Patient Preference for Self-Injection Devices in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Discrete Choice Experiment in China

OBJECTIVE

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is increasingly treated with biologics, which is commonly administered by injection devices. The aim of this study is to evaluate patients' preferences for self-injection devices in RA, and to elicit their willingness to pay (WTP) for injector devices in China.

METHODS

RA patients were recruited from Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Chengdu, Wuhan and Xi'an in China. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was employed to elicit patient preferences. Patients were presented with 15 choice sets that consisted of seven attributes, which were developed based on literature review and further validated by physicians. The seven attributes were as follows: operation steps, injection pain, feedback indication, needle visibility, needle protection, size and out-of-pocket costs. A mixed logit model was used to analyze the relative importance of seven attributes and to calculate the WTP for a changed attribute level.

RESULTS

Analyses included 114 adults with RA (mean age of 44.6 years old). When choosing the injection device, all attributes had significant influence. Among nonmonetary attributes, very slight injection pain was the most preferred for patients, followed by auto-injection method, thicker size, hidden needle, with needle protection and multiple feedback indication. Patients had a negative preference for increasing out-of-pocket costs. Patients were willing to pay CNY 45.26 for improving slight injection pain to very slight injection pain, CNY 13.26 for the auto-injection method, CNY 12.22 for the thicker size, CNY 10.06 for the hidden needle, CNY 9.82 for needle protection, and CNY 9.70 for multiple feedback indicators.

CONCLUSION

The results suggested that injection pain was the most important attribute for RA patients. Meanwhile, all other enhanced attributes of self-injection devices also significantly influence patients' selection on injection devices. Findings suggested that there is significant potential value in developing self-injection devices that could further help improve treatment adherence and promote patient-centered care in autoimmune diseases.

Formative Study on the Wearability and Usability of a Large-Volume Patch Injector

Background

The subcutaneous self-administration of biologics using a single large-volume bolus dose requires novel large-volume patch injectors. However, the usability and wearability of such on-body devices has rarely been investigated thus far. Therefore, this formative simulated use experiment studies the overall handling and acceptability in terms of the size and weight of a novel 10 mL large-volume patch injector device platform.

Methods

Twenty-three participants, including patients and healthcare professionals, simulated two injections with the large-volume patch injector, each lasting 17 min. During the injections, the patient participants performed predefined movements and activities with the on-body devices. Perceived usability and wearability were assessed through observation by the moderator and participant-reported feedback using five-point Likert scales and open-ended interviews.

Results

All participants successfully completed the simulated injections. Only non-serious usability issues were identified. Users rated the device acceptability in terms of wearability and usability with high ratings.

Conclusion

The results suggest the safe and effective usage of a novel prefilled large-volume patch injector that enables the subcutaneous delivery of a single bolus dose of up to 10 mL with an injection duration of 15 min. The participants of the simulated use study successfully used the device regardless of the disease state, age, or body size and habitus.

Real-world data for golimumab treatment in patients with ulcerative colitis in Japan: interim analysis in post-marketing surveillance

Background/Aims

Golimumab (GLM) is an anti-tumor necrosis factor-α drug approved for treating moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis (UC). A 52-week post-marketing surveillance (PMS) was initiated to evaluate its safety and effectiveness in patients with UC in Japan. We present an interim report of the ongoing PMS.

Methods

Patients received 200 mg of subcutaneous GLM at week 0, 100 mg at week 2, and 100 mg 4 weekly thereafter. The safety analysis set included 392 patients with UC, and the effectiveness analysis set 387 patients. Safety and effectiveness were assessed at week 6.

Results

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 8.2% (32/392) and serious ADRs in 4.6% (18/392). The most frequent ADRs were infection and infestation (3.3%), with herpes zoster being the most common. ADRs were significantly higher in patients with concomitant corticosteroid use (odds ratio [OR], 3.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40–9.68). No significant difference in ADR incidence was observed between patients aged ≥65 and <65 years (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.35–3.47). Six-week effectiveness of GLM was confirmed by a decrease in the partial Mayo score (–2.3; 95% CI, –2.6 to –2.1) and C-reactive protein levels (–0.64; 95% CI, –0.92 to –0.36), including in the biologics-experienced population.

Conclusions

The safety and effectiveness of GLM at week 6 in a real-world setting were demonstrated in patients with UC in Japan. ADR patterns were consistent with previous reports with no new safety signals. Concomitant corticosteroid use may be associated with increased ADR incidence. The final results of the ongoing PMS are necessary for further evaluation.

IBD goes home: from telemedicine to self-administered advanced therapies

Introduction: Major challenges have been posed by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in the routine management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The need for constant monitoring of diseases activity and prompt adjustment of therapy have been balanced with the risk of contagion related to face-to-face consultations. Therefore, digital health initiatives have been pursued for safety reasons as vicarious instruments to avoid overcrowding of the IBD clinics. However, concerns and skepticism about the feasibility of digital health and telemedicine modalities limited their uptake in clinical practice in the pre-pandemic period.Areas covered: We conducted a literature overview on the current state of the art and the potential future benefits deriving from the integration of telemedicine systems, home-based laboratory tests, and self-administered drugs into IBD daily practice.Expert opinion: Digital health and telemedicine approaches at distance have been experimented as effective tools to avoid overcrowding of clinics and reduce risk from SARS-CoV2 exposure. Home-based point of care testing, such as fecal calprotectin and dried blood samples, might represent an effective method of remote monitoring of patients particularly when in-person visits are precluded. High expectations are placed on the use of self-administered advanced therapies, such as new subcutaneous formulation of biologics.

Biobetters in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders: An international Delphi consensus

Several efforts have been made to improve the available therapeutic armamentarium of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs) leading to the development of biobetters. To date, there is no commonly accepted definition of biobetters. Sixteen physicians with expertise in the field of IMIDs from eleven countries attended a virtual international consensus meeting to provide for the first time a definition of biobetter and to identify unmet needs on this topic. Improvements in clinical outcomes and drug pharmacology were considered crucial for the definition of biobetters, while safety profile and patient acceptability were not. In addition, an appropriate balance between clinical outcomes and costs and a shared decision between physicians and patients should guide the decision to use a biobetter. Clinical studies are required to validate the biobetter definition and to investigate their role in the management of patients with IMIDs.

An Open-Label Tolerability and Actual-Use Human Factors Study of Etrolizumab Autoinjector in Healthy Volunteers

Introduction

Etrolizumab is a novel, dual-action, anti-β7 integrin antibody in development for patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease. Phase 3 studies use a prefilled syringe (PFS) for etrolizumab administration. In parallel, an autoinjector (AI) is being developed to increase delivery options for patients if etrolizumab is approved. Here we describe the overall development strategy and detail the first-in-human study of this AI.

Methods

This open-label study of healthy volunteers evaluated the tolerability and usability of the etrolizumab AI under development. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with greater than mild pain following injection. Adverse events (AEs) and usage errors were also assessed. Results were reported by injection site (thigh vs abdomen) and needle training (experienced vs naive). Pharmacokinetic (PK) variability between participants was an exploratory endpoint.

Results

Thirty participants completed the study; 97% of them did not experience any pain greater than mild, and 50% did not experience any pain at all. Three usage errors were observed, one of which resulted in delivery of a partial dose of etrolizumab. No patterns of usage errors were observed. Mild injection site reactions (ISRs) were reported; all resolved by the end of the study. Participants injecting into the abdomen reported more ISRs than those injecting into the thigh; needle training did not influence AE incidence or severity.

Conclusions

Results from this first-in-human study demonstrate that single injections of etrolizumab 105 mg using an AI were well tolerated in healthy volunteers, with transient, mild pain and minimal usage errors. Results from this study also informed the design of a subsequent PK comparability study evaluating exposure of etrolizumab administered by either the PFS or the AI. Overall, the availability of an AI may provide an attractive option for patients desiring a convenient, easy-to-use delivery mechanism for etrolizumab.

Trial Registration

NCT02629744

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-021-01651-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparable Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Etrolizumab Administered by Prefilled Syringe or Autoinjector in a Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers

Introduction

Etrolizumab is a novel, dual-action anti-β7 integrin antibody studied in phase 3 trials in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. An autoinjector (AI) is being developed in parallel to complement the prefilled syringe with needle safety device (PFS-NSD) for subcutaneous (SC) administration in these trials. Here we demonstrate the comparable pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety of both devices.

Methods

This randomized, open-label, two-part study in healthy participants evaluated the comparability of etrolizumab exposure between the AI and the PFS-NSD. Part 1 (pilot) involved a small number of participants, and initial results were used to finalize the design of the larger part 2 (pivotal) study. In both parts, participants were randomly assigned to receive a single SC dose of etrolizumab 105 mg by AI or PFS-NSD. Randomization was stratified by body weight. Primary pharmacokinetic outcomes were C_max, AUC_last, and AUC_0–inf.

Results

One hundred and eighty healthy participants (part 1, n = 30; part 2, n = 150) received a single SC dose of etrolizumab by AI or PFS-NSD. Primary pharmacokinetic results from part 1 supported modification of the part 2 study design. Results from part 2 demonstrated that etrolizumab exposure was equivalent between devices, with geometric mean ratios (GMRs) between AI and PFS-NSD of 102% (90% confidence interval [CI] 94.2–111) for C_max, 98.0% (90% CI 89.3–107) for AUC_last, and 97.6% (90% CI 88.6–107) for AUC_0–inf. Median t_max and mean terminal t_1/2 were also similar between devices. GMRs and 90% CIs of all primary pharmacokinetic parameters were fully contained within the predefined equivalence limits (80–125%).

Conclusion

This pharmacokinetic study demonstrated that single SC injections of etrolizumab 105 mg using an AI or a PFS-NSD resulted in equivalent etrolizumab exposure and similar safety and tolerability in healthy participants. Taken together, these results support the use of an AI for etrolizumab administration.

Trial Registration

NCT02996019.

Potential Benefits of the Self-Administration of Subcutaneous Methotrexate with Autoinjector Devices for Patients: A Review

The role of patient adherence in improving the efficacy of any treatment is widely accepted, as well as its impact in optimizing the use of healthcare resources and associated costs. Adherence is particularly affected in chronic conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), requiring long-term therapies and a commitment of the patient to manage his/her disease. Methotrexate (MTX) is one of the mainstays of treatment for several immune-mediated inflammatory joint and skin diseases, especially RA. The use of parenteral MTX, particularly when administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection, has recently raised a great interest to overcome the limitations of oral MTX. For addressing this issue, new optimized self-injection systems have been developed to improve the ease of use of SC MTX. Increasing evidence shows how patients tend to opt for autoinjectors over prefilled syringes or conventional syringes in terms of easiness of use, preference and satisfaction, regardless of whether the treatment is a biologic or MTX. Additionally, positive views and beliefs of patients about treatment may contribute to increasing expectations of effectiveness and treatment adherence. Similarly, the implementation of prefilled pens in clinical practice might be a way to facilitate and simplify the self-injection of SC MTX delivery, optimizing adherence and treatment outcomes as a consequence. This article aimed to review the available literature data on the use of MTX autoinjectors and their impact on treatment adherence and patients’ perceptions.

Autoinjector device for rapid administration of drugs and antidotes in emergency situations and in mass casualty management

There are several situations such as medical emergencies and incidents involving mass casualties where drugs and antidotes have to be administered immediately along with other first aid at the site of the event. Self-administration by the affected person or by a companion is required as a life-saving measure. Autoinjector devices (AIDs) are useful for the rapid administration of drugs and antidotes and they can also be used by those who have not been medically trained. This makes them very convenient for emergency and mass casualty management. An AID has a drug cartridge with an embedded needle for subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, which is usually painless. The drugs are delivered slowly by the AID across a large area in the muscle, which increases the absorption and the drug effects are equal to that of intravenous administration. A variety of AIDs are available, such as atropine and pralidoxime for nerve agent poisoning, epinephrine for anaphylactic shock and allergy, diazepam for seizures, sumatriptan for migraine, amikacin for antibacterial treatment, buprenorphine for pain relief and monoclonal antibodies for a variety of diseases. This review describes the published peer-reviewed literature identified by online searches of journal databases.

Patient satisfaction survey: substitution of reference etanercept with a biosimilar product

OBJECTIVES

To assess patient satisfaction after pharmacy-mediated replacement of the originator etanercept prefilled syringe with its biosimilar prefilled pen.

METHODS

Prospective observational study from March to May 2018, to assess satisfaction with the new drug dispensed. Patients were asked to answer a paper questionnaire with three questions: pain at injection site, ease of administration, and overall patient satisfaction with the change, rated on a scale from 1 (not satisfied) to 5 (extremely satisfied).

RESULTS

The questionnaire was given to 134 patients (74 men, 60 women), with an average age of 55 years. 118 patients (88%) were from the Rheumatology Service and 16 patients (12%) from Dermatology. The median treatment duration with etanercept was 61 months. 87 (65%) completed questionnaires were collected. The mean pain score was 3.4. Most patients found administration easy with the biosimilar pen, with an average score of 3.7. Mean overall satisfaction was rated at 3.3, being higher among men, younger patients, and those with shorter duration of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The change of the original product from etanercept to a biosimilar product was acceptable for most of the patients who responded to the survey. Surveys allow us to determine the opinion and preferences of patients, thus achieving higher satisfaction with their treatment. Further research is needed to evaluate the effect of automatic replacement. A collaborative multidisciplinary switching programme should be implemented based on the feedback provided by patients.

Innovative approaches to biologic development on the trail of CT-P13: biosimilars, value-added medicines, and biobetters

The biosimilar concept is now well established. Clinical data accumulated pre- and post-approval have supported biosimilar uptake, in turn stimulating competition in the biologics market and increasing patient access to biologics. Following technological advances, other innovative biologics, such as “biobetters” or “value-added medicines,” are now reaching the market. These innovative biologics differ from the reference product by offering additional clinical or non-clinical benefits. We discuss these innovative biologics with reference to CT-P13, initially available as an intravenous (IV) biosimilar of reference infliximab. A subcutaneous (SC) formulation, CT-P13 SC, has now been developed. Relative to CT-P13 IV, CT-P13 SC offers clinical benefits in terms of pharmacokinetics, with comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity, as well as increased convenience for patients and reduced demands on healthcare system resources. As was once the case for biosimilars, nomenclature and regulatory pathways for innovative biologics require clarification to support their uptake and ultimately benefit patients.

User-Centric Approach to Specifying Technical Attributes of Drug Delivery Devices: Empirical Study of Autoinjector-Cap Removal Forces

PURPOSE

The subcutaneous delivery of biologics using pre-filled autoinjector devices continues to attract broad scholarly interests. However, research still lacks a detailed understanding of user perceptions as the basis for specifying the clinically relevant technical attributes of a device, such as the cap-removal force. Therefore, this article studies the ability of users to remove the autoinjector cap, as well as the effects of the cap-removal force and user characteristics on the perceived ease of decapping.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-two participants among patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals removed the protective cap using non-functional devices with different target cap-removal forces between 25 N and 55 N. Data were collected on the ability of the users to effectively decap the device and their perceived ease of decapping. Linear regression was then applied to quantify the impact of the decapping force and patient characteristics on the perceived ease of decapping.

RESULTS

The participants of the study effectively decapped all autoinjector devices irrespective of age, sex, and dexterity impairments. Moreover, the study reveals that the perceived ease of decapping decreases significantly with increasing decapping force and participants' dexterity impairments.

CONCLUSION

The study provides initial empirical evidence on the ability of users to decap autoinjector devices and shows how increasing the cap-removal force and dexterity impairments reduce the perceived ease of decapping.

Understanding and Minimising Injection-Site Pain Following Subcutaneous Administration of Biologics: A Narrative Review

Injection-site pain (ISP) is a subjective side effect that is commonly reported with the subcutaneous administration of biological agents, yet it may only be a concern to some. Multiple factors related to the product formulation, such as pH, volume and excipients, and/or to the injection process have the potential to contribute to ISP, while patient-related factors, such as low body weight, gender and age, can make an individual more susceptible to experiencing ISP. While total elimination of ISP remains unlikely with any subcutaneously administered agent, it can be minimised by helping the patient to develop a confident and competent injection technique via robust and effective training. Careful management of patient expectations along with open discussion regarding the potential risk of ISP may serve to minimise treatment-related anxieties and, importantly, allow the patient to remain in control of his/her treatment. Other interventions to help minimise ISP include psychological interventions, allowing biologics to reach room temperature prior to injection, using the most suitable injection device for the individual patient and selecting an alternative drug formulation, when available. Productive patient–physician communication remains important in order to support and optimise treatment experience and adherence, while also providing the opportunity for patients to discuss any ISP-related issues.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin in primary immunodeficiency - impact of training and infusion characteristics on patient-reported outcomes

Background

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) is increasingly utilized in primary immunodeficiency (PI). Understanding factors associated with treatment experience and satisfaction can optimize patient outcomes. We analyzed Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF) survey data to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in relation to SCIG training and infusion characteristics. Respondents’ PRO scores were rank ordered into ‘best’, ‘intermediate’, and ‘worst’ tertiles. Predicted probabilities of being in the best tertile with any combination of characteristics were generated for each PRO.

Results

In 366 SCIG respondents, higher odds of being in the best PRO tertile were driven by favorable training characteristics (particularly, higher confidence post-training and no training barriers) and efficient infusions (infusion preparation ≤20 min and actual infusion < 2 h). Age (≤17 years old) and treatment experience (> 2 years) increased the odds of being in the best tertiles. Compared with the least favorable training/infusion characteristics, those with the most favorable training/infusion characteristics had higher predicted probabilities of being in the best tertiles: TSQM side effects, 59% vs 4%; convenience, 52% vs 4%; effectiveness, 27% vs 13%; global, 26% vs 3%; PROMIS Fatigue, 44% vs 18%.

Conclusions

Increased experience with SCIG consistently improved PROs, but our findings predicted that enhanced training and infusion characteristics improve patient treatment satisfaction beyond that achieved by experience alone.

Belgian IBD Research Group [BIRD] Position Statement 2019 on the Use of Adalimumab Biosimilars in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

The emergence of biosimilars is generally considered as an opportunity to guarantee accessibility to affordable treatments and to enhance financial sustainability of national health systems. Since 2017, five biosimilars of adalimumab were approved by the European Medicines Agency [EMA] for use in inflammatory bowel disease: ABP 510, SB5, GP2017, FKB327, and MSB11022. In this position statement, the available efficacy and safety data of the different adalimumab biosimilars in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases are summarised. Furthermore, the Belgian IBD research group [BIRD] formulates statements concerning the use of adalimumab biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease.

Single-Use Autoinjector Functionality And Reliability For At-Home Administration Of Benralizumab For Patients With Severe Asthma: GRECO Trial Results

Purpose

Accessorized prefilled syringes (APFS) have demonstrated functionality and reliability for subcutaneous (SC) delivery, including self-administration, of benralizumab 30 mg in the clinic or at home. The multicenter, open-label GRECO study (NCT02918071) assessed functionality and reliability of a single-use autoinjector (AI) for at-home benralizumab administration by patients or their caregivers.

Patients and methods

Adults with severe asthma received benralizumab SC injections at the study site at Weeks 0, 4, and 8. The first dose was administered by health care providers. Patients/caregivers had the option of administering the second dose and were required to administer the third dose under supervision. At Weeks 12 and 16, patients/caregivers administered benralizumab via AI at home. After each administration, patients/caregivers completed questionnaires concerning administration and device functioning. All AI devices used were returned for evaluation.

Results

A total of 595 AIs were used for 121 patients (mean age 48.5 years; 64% female) in the clinic and at home. Of 116 participants, 113 (97.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.63–99.46) and 112 (96.6%; 95% CI: 91.41–99.05) successfully administered benralizumab at home at Weeks 12 and 16, respectively; 108 (93.1%; 95% CI: 86.86–96.98) were successful on both occasions. Throughout the study, 10 (1.7%) AI administrations were unsuccessful: 8 (1.3%) because of user error, 1 (0.2%) with undetermined cause, and 1 (0.2%) because of a manufacturing defect. Benralizumab efficacy (assessed by Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 score) and pharmacokinetics for patients using the AI were comparable to published results for patients receiving benralizumab via syringe in a clinical setting. No new or unexpected safety findings were observed.

Conclusion

AIs were functional, reliable, and performed well in the clinic and at home. Nearly all patients and caregivers successfully administered SC benralizumab via AI. Benralizumab availability in AI and APFS could provide patients with choices for self-administration.

Comparison of autoinjector with accessorized prefilled syringe for benralizumab pharmacokinetic exposure: AMES trial results

OBJECTIVE

We compared the pharmacokinetic exposure following a single subcutaneous dose of benralizumab 30 mg using either autoinjectors (AI) or accessorized prefilled syringes (APFS). APFS and AI functionality and reliability for at-home benralizumab delivery have been demonstrated in the GREGALE and GRECO studies, respectively.

METHODS

In the open-label AMES study (NCT02968914), 180 healthy adult men and women were randomized to one of two device (AI or APFS) and three injection site (upper arm, abdomen, or thigh) combinations. Randomization was stratified by weight (<70 kg, 70-84.9 kg, and ≥85 kg). Blood eosinophil counts were measured on Days 1, 8, 29, and 57.

RESULTS

Benralizumab pharmacokinetic exposure was similar between AI and APFS. Geometric mean ratios (AI/APFS) (90% CI) were 92.8% (87.4-98.6) and 94.5% (88.2-101.2) for two area under the concentration‒time curve measurements (AUC_last and AUC_inf). Benralizumab exposure was approximately 15-30% greater for thigh vs. abdomen or upper arm administration. Exposure was slightly greater for APFS vs. AI regardless of injection site or weight class. These differences were unlikely to be clinically relevant, as eosinophil depletion was achieved consistently with both devices at all injection sites. No device malfunctions were reported. No new or unexpected safety findings were observed.

CONCLUSION

Benralizumab pharmacokinetic exposure was similar between AI and APFS, with consistent blood eosinophil count depletion observed with both devices. These results support benralizumab administration with either AI or APFS, providing patients and physicians increased choice, flexibility, and convenience for potential at-home delivery.

Patient satisfaction survey: substitution of reference etanercept with a biosimilar product

OBJECTIVES

To assess patient satisfaction after pharmacy-mediated replacement of the originator etanercept prefilled syringe with its biosimilar prefilled pen.

METHODS

Prospective observational study from March to May 2018, to assess satisfaction with the new drug dispensed. Patients were asked to answer a paper questionnaire with three questions: pain at injection site, ease of administration, and overall patient satisfaction with the change, rated on a scale from 1 (not satisfied) to 5 (extremely satisfied).

RESULTS

The questionnaire was given to 134 patients (74 men, 60 women), with an average age of 55 years. 118 patients (88%) were from the Rheumatology Service and 16 patients (12%) from Dermatology. The median treatment duration with etanercept was 61 months. 87 (65%) completed questionnaires were collected. The mean pain score was 3.4. Most patients found administration easy with the biosimilar pen, with an average score of 3.7. Mean overall satisfaction was rated at 3.3, being higher among men, younger patients, and those with shorter duration of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The change of the original product from etanercept to a biosimilar product was acceptable for most of the patients who responded to the survey. Surveys allow us to determine the opinion and preferences of patients, thus achieving higher satisfaction with their treatment. Further research is needed to evaluate the effect of automatic replacement. A collaborative multidisciplinary switching programme should be implemented based on the feedback provided by patients.

A portfolio of biologic self-injection devices in rheumatology: how patient involvement in device design can improve treatment experience

Biologic drugs (e.g. anti-tumor necrosis factors) are effective treatments for multiple chronic inflammatory diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis. Administration of biologic drugs is usually via subcutaneous self-injection, which provides many patient benefits compared to infusions including increased flexibility, reduced costs, and reduced caregiver burden. However, it is also associated with challenges such as needle phobia, patient treatment misconceptions and incorrect drug administration, and can be impacted by dexterity problems. Evidence suggests these problems, along with other drug administration challenges (e.g. patient forgetfulness, busy lifestyles, and polypharmacy), can reduce patient adherence to treatment. To combat these challenges, patient feedback has been used to develop a range of self-injection devices, including pre-filled syringes, pre-filled pens, and electronic injection devices. Providing different devices for drug administration gives patients the opportunity to choose a device that addresses the challenges they face as an individual. Research suggests involving patients in medical device development, providing patients with a choice of devices and enrolling individuals in patient support programs can empower patients to take control of their treatment journey. By providing a portfolio of self-injection devices, designed based on patient needs, patient experience will improve, potentially improving adherence and hence, long-term treatment outcomes.

GP2017, an adalimumab biosimilar: pharmacokinetic similarity to its reference medicine and pharmacokinetics comparison of different administration methods

Background: To compare the pharmacokinetics of Sandoz biosimilar adalimumab (GP2017) with reference adalimumab (Humira) in healthy volunteers (PK similarity study) and to compare the pharmacokinetics of GP2017 administered by autoinjector (AI) or prefilled syringe (PFS; delivery study). Methods: Healthy male subjects were randomized to receive a single 40 mg subcutaneous injection of GP2017, US-licensed or EU-authorized reference adalimumab (US/EU-Humira; PK similarity study) or a single 40 mg subcutaneous injection of GP2017 via AI or PFS (delivery study). Pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity were assessed over 72 days post-injection. Results: The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for C_max and AUC_0-inf were 1.05 (0.99-1.11) and 1.04 (0.96-1.13) for GP2017/EU-Humira and 1.00 (0.94-1.06) and 1.08 (1.00-1.18) for GP2017/US-Humira, all within the prespecified margin of 0.80-1.25 (PK similarity study). Pharmacokinetic parameters of GP2017 matched between AI and PFS (delivery study). Safety and immunogenicity were similar across groups in both studies. Conclusion: PK similarity between GP2017, EU- and US-Humira was demonstrated. The safety profile of GP2017 was consistent with previous reports for Humira. These results contribute to the 'totality-of-the-evidence' supporting biosimilarity of GP2017 to Humira. PK and tolerability were equivalent for GP2017 dosed by AI or PFS. Trial registration: PK similarity study EudraCT no. 2015-000579-28; Delivery study: EudraCT no. 2014-002879-29.

Early Mucosal Healing Predicts Favorable Outcomes in Patients With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis Treated With Golimumab: Data From the Real-life BE-SMART Cohort

BACKGROUND

Golimumab (GOL) is registered for moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Data on the use of GOL in daily clinical practice are limited. Currently, it is unclear which factors are predictive of a favorable outcome. The goals of this study were to evaluate the mid-term outcome of GOL (week 26) in patients with moderate to severe UC and to determine predictors of favorable outcome.

METHODS

Patients included in the SMART study (NCT02155335) were evaluated for their mid-term outcome. Demographic data, disease characteristics, and medical history were recorded retrospectively. Data on disease activity based on total Mayo score, previous and concomitant medication, GOL dosing, mucosal healing (Mayo 0 or 1), adverse events (colectomy, hospitalization), and biomarkers (C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, hemoglobin, and albumin) were collected at baseline and weeks 2, 6, 14, 26, and 52. GOL was dosed at 200 and 100 mg at weeks 0 and 2, respectively, and 50 mg (<80 kg body weight) or 100 mg (≥80 kg body weight) every 4 weeks thereafter. The primary end point was steroid-free GOL continuation at week 26.

RESULTS

From the 91 evaluable patients (42% female; median age, 42 years; median disease duration, 5 years), 4% were active smokers, 25% had extensive colitis, and 38% had an endoscopic Mayo score of 3 at baseline. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) baseline Mayo score was 9 (8-10). Although 75% of patients had previously failed immunomodulators (IMMs), the majority (87%) were anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) naïve. GOL was started in combination with IMM in 40% and steroids in 64%. The median (IQR) duration of GOL therapy during follow-up was 35.7 (11.4-105.7) weeks. Twenty-six weeks after GOL induction, 37 patients (41%) were steroid-free and still on GOL, of whom 8 (21.6%) required GOL dose optimization. Short-term mucosal healing (STMH) at week 14 was evaluated in 60% of the patients. Considering the whole cohort, only 40% achieved STMH. No predictors could be retained of short-term treatment outcome. In multivariate analysis, STMH was predictive of steroid-free GOL continuation at week 26 (odds ratio [OR], 5.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.90-16.29; P = 0.002) and week 52 (OR, 9.38; 95% CI, 2.68-32.84; P < 0.001). In patients continuing GOL after week 14, STMH was predictive of intervention-free survival (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.09-3.86; P = 0.026) and discontinuation-free survival (OR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.58-7.58; P = 0.002). During follow-up, 78% needed an intervention, 68% discontinued GOL, and 3 patients needed a colectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-life data confirm the moderate effectiveness of GOL on the mid-term in active UC, but therapeutic interventions are frequently needed. Short-term mucosal healing predicts a favorable outcome. 10.1093/ibd/izy219_video1izy219.video15798038438001.