Pharmacokinetic optimisation of therapy with beta-adrenergic blocking agents

Antihypertensive drugs and brain function: mechanisms underlying therapeutically beneficial and harmful neuropsychiatric effects

A bidirectional relationship exists between hypertension and psychiatric disorders, including unipolar and bipolar depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), psychosis, schizophrenia, mania, and dementia/cognitive decline. Repurposing of antihypertensive drugs to treat mental disorders is thus being explored. A systematic knowledge of the mechanisms of action and clinical consequences of the use of antihypertensive agents on neuropsychiatric functions has not been achieved yet. In this article, we review the putative role of antihypertensive agents in psychiatric disorders, discuss the targets and mechanisms of action, and examine how and to what extent specific drug classes/molecules may trigger, worsen, or mitigate psychiatric symptoms. In addition, we review pharmacokinetics (brain penetration of drugs) and pharmacogenetics data that add important information to assess risks and benefits of antihypertensive drugs in neuropsychiatric settings. The scientific literature shows robust evidence of a positive effect of α1 blockers on PTSD symptoms, nightmares and sleep quality, α2 agonists on core symptoms, executive function and quality of life in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, PTSD, Tourette's syndrome, and β blockers on anxiety, aggression, working memory, and social communication. Renin-angiotensin system modulators exert protective effects on cognition, depression, and anxiety, and the loop diuretic bumetanide reduced the core symptoms of autism in a subset of patients. There is no evidence of clear benefits of calcium channel blockers in mood disorders in the scientific literature. These findings are mainly from preclinical studies; clinical data are still insufficient or of anecdotal nature, and seldom systematic. The information herewith provided can support a better therapeutic approach to hypertension, tailored to patients with, or with high susceptibility to, psychiatric illness. It may prompt clinical studies exploring the potential benefit of antihypertensive drugs in selected patients with neuropsychiatric comorbidities that include outcomes of neuropsychiatric interest and specifically assess undesirable effects or interactions.

Neuropsychiatric Consequences of Lipophilic Beta-Blockers

Beta-blockers are a class of drugs with important benefits in cardiovascular pathology. In this paper, we aim to highlight their adverse and therapeutic effects in the neuropsychiatric field. With respect to permeability, we would like to mention that most beta-blockers are lipophilic and can cross the blood–brain barrier. Observational studies show the presence of neuropsychiatric side effects when taking beta-blockers, and is the reason for which caution is recommended in their use in patients with depressive syndrome. From a therapeutic point of view, most current evidence is for the use of beta-blockers in migraine attacks, essential tremor, and akathisia. Beta-blockers appear to be effective in the treatment of aggressive behavior, beneficial in the prevention of posttraumatic stress syndrome and may play a role in the adjuvant treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder, which is refractory to standard therapy. In conclusion, the relationship between beta-blockers and the central nervous system appears as a two-sided coin. Summarizing the neuropsychiatric side effects of beta-blockers, we suggest that clinicians pay special attention to the pharmacological properties of different beta-blockers.

Beta blockers in patients with end-stage renal disease-Evidence-based recommendations

For patients who require hemodialysis, beta blockers offer a simultaneous opportunity and challenge in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Beta blockers are well supported by data from nondialysis populations and directly mitigate the sympathetic overactivity that links chronic kidney disease with cardiovascular sequelae. However, the evidence supporting their use in patients receiving hemodialysis is sparse and the heterogeneity of the beta blocker class makes it difficult to prescribe these medications with confidence. Despite these limitations, both trial and observational data exist that can help guide the use of these medications. In this review, we outline the reasons to consider beta blockers for patients receiving hemodialysis, discuss the barriers to their use, and provide specific evidence-based recommendations for beta blocker use in patients with heart failure, hypertension, ischemic heart disease and arrhythmia.

β-Adrenergic blockade in cardiovascular disease

The development and subsequent clinical application of the β-adrenergic receptor blocking drugs represent one of the major advances in human pharmacotherapeutics. No other class of synthetic drugs has demonstrated such widespread therapeutic utility for the treatment and prevention of so many cardiovascular diseases. In addition, these drugs have proven to be molecular probes that have contributed to our understanding of the disease, and on the molecular level, both the structure and function of the 7 transmembrane G protein receptors that mediate the actions of many different hormones, neurotransmitters, and drugs. The evolution of β-blocker drug development has led to refinements in their pharmacodynamic actions that include agents with relative β1-selectivity, partial agonist activity, concomitant α-adrenergic blockers activity, and direct vasodilator activity. In addition, long-acting and ultra-short-acting formulations of β-blockers have also demonstrated a remarkable record of clinical safety in patients of all ages.

The lack of effect of aerobic exercise training on propranolol pharmacokinetics in young and elderly adults

The effects of exercise training on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered propranolol were studied in young and elderly healthy volunteers. Twenty-three young (30 +/- 5 years of age) and 20 elderly (67 +/- 5 years of age) adults were randomly assigned to endurance training (N = 12 young subjects, 10 elderly subjects) or nonexercising control (N = 11 young subjects, 10 elderly subjects) groups. Training consisted of treadmill walking, stair climbing, or both three times per week for 40 minutes at 70-85% of maximal heart rate reserve for 16 weeks. Resting plasma propranolol concentrations after a single dose of 80 mg of oral propranolol were measured by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection, and estimated hepatic blood flow measured was measured using indocyanine green during supine test. Aerobic training increased maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) by 13% and 14% in the exercising young and elderly groups, respectively. There was no change in VO2 max in either control group. Adjusted mean estimated hepatic blood flow after exercise corrected for body weight for the young subjects who did not exercise (15.6 mL/min/Kg) and those who did (18.2 mL/min/Kg) groups were of borderline significance. No statistical differences were detected in the experimental propranolol pharmacokinetic parameters (maximal concentration, time of maximal concentration, terminal half-life, area under the curve, and protein binding) or derived pharmacokinetic parameters (intrinsic clearance, bioavailability, clearance, and volume of distribution). These results provide evidence that changes in aerobic fitness do not produce corresponding changes in propranolol pharmacokinetics in young or elderly adults.

Individual variation in first-pass metabolism

Individual variation in pharmacokinetics has long been recognised. This variability is extremely pronounced in drugs that undergo extensive first-pass metabolism. Drug concentrations obtained from individuals given the same dose could range several-fold, even in young healthy volunteers. In addition to the liver, which is the major organ for drug and xenobiotic metabolism, the gut and the lung can contribute significantly to variability in first-pass metabolism. Unfortunately, the contributions of the latter 2 organs are difficult to quantify because conventional in vivo methods for quantifying first-pass metabolism are not sufficiently specific. Drugs that are mainly eliminated by phase II metabolism (e.g. estrogens and progestogens, morphine, etc.) undergo significant first-pass gut metabolism. This is because the gut is rich in conjugating enzymes. The role of the lung in first-pass metabolism is not clear, although it is quite avid in binding basic drugs such as lidocaine (lignocaine), propranolol, etc. Factors such as age, gender, disease states, enzyme induction and inhibition, genetic polymorphism and food effects have been implicated in causing variability in pharmacokinetics of drugs that undergo extensive first-pass metabolism. Of various factors considered, age and gender make the least evident contributions, whereas genetic polymorphism, enzymatic changes due to induction or inhibition, and the effects of food are major contributors to the variability in first-pass metabolism. These factors can easily cause several-fold variations. Polymorphic disposition of imipramine and propafenone, an increase in verapamil first-pass metabolism by rifampicin (rifampin), and the effects of food on propranolol, metoprolol and propafenone, are typical examples. Unfortunately, the contributions of these factors towards variability are unpredictable and tend to be drug-dependent. A change in steady-state clearance of a drug can sometimes be exacerbated when first-pass metabolism and systemic clearance of a drug are simultaneously altered. Therefore, an understanding of the source of variability is the key to the optimisation of therapy.