Pharmacokinetics of lumiracoxib in plasma and synovial fluid

Targeting metabolism by B-raf inhibitors and diclofenac restrains the viability of BRAF-mutated thyroid carcinomas with Hif-1α-mediated glycolytic phenotype

BACKGROUND

B-raf inhibitors (BRAFi) are effective for BRAF-mutated papillary (PTC) and anaplastic (ATC) thyroid carcinomas, although acquired resistance impairs tumour cells' sensitivity and/or limits drug efficacy. Targeting metabolic vulnerabilities is emerging as powerful approach in cancer.

METHODS

In silico analyses identified metabolic gene signatures and Hif-1α as glycolysis regulator in PTC. BRAF-mutated PTC, ATC and control thyroid cell lines were exposed to HIF1A siRNAs or chemical/drug treatments (CoCl2, EGF, HGF, BRAFi, MEKi and diclofenac). Genes/proteins expression, glucose uptake, lactate quantification and viability assays were used to investigate the metabolic vulnerability of BRAF-mutated cells.

RESULTS

A specific metabolic gene signature was identified as a hallmark of BRAF-mutated tumours, which display a glycolytic phenotype, characterised by enhanced glucose uptake, lactate efflux and increased expression of Hif-1α-modulated glycolytic genes. Indeed, Hif-1α stabilisation counteracts the inhibitory effects of BRAFi on these genes and on cell viability. Interestingly, targeting metabolic routes with BRAFi and diclofenac combination we could restrain the glycolytic phenotype and synergistically reduce tumour cells' viability.

CONCLUSION

The identification of a metabolic vulnerability of BRAF-mutated carcinomas and the capacity BRAFi and diclofenac combination to target metabolism open new therapeutic perspectives in maximising drug efficacy and reducing the onset of secondary resistance and drug-related toxicity.

Pharmacokinetic Assessment of Staphylococcal Phage K Following Parenteral and Intra-articular Administration in Rabbits

The therapeutic value of phage as an alternative to antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial infections is being considered in the wake of mounting antibiotic resistance. In this study, the pharmacokinetic properties of Staphylococcus aureus phage K following intravenous and intra-articular administration were investigated in a rabbit model. Using a traditional plaque assay and a novel quantitative PCR assay to measure phage levels in specimens over time, it was found that intra-articularly administered phage enters the systemic circulation; that phage may be detected in synovial fluid up to 24 h following the intra-articular, but not intravenous, administration; and that qPCR-based enumeration is generally more sensitive than plaque enumeration, with fair to moderate correlation between the two methods. Findings presented should inform the design of phage therapy experiments and therapeutic drug monitoring in preclinical and human phage studies.

Metabolic targeting synergizes with MAPK inhibition and delays drug resistance in melanoma

Tumors, including melanomas, frequently show an accelerated glucose metabolism. Mutations in the v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), detected in about 50% of all melanomas, result in further enhancement of glycolysis. Therefore anti-metabolic substances might enhance the impact of RAF inhibitors. We have identified the two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) diclofenac and lumiracoxib being able to restrict energy metabolism in human melanoma cells by targeting lactate release and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). In combination with the RAF inhibitor vemurafenib strong synergism was observed: Diclofenac as well as lumiracoxib increased the anti-glycolytic impact of vemurafenib and prevented RAF-inhibitor induced metabolic reprogramming towards OXPHOS. Consequently, both NSAIDs sensitized melanoma cells to vemurafenib triggered proliferation arrest and enhanced the anti-tumor effect of RAF inhibitors from cytostatic to cytotoxic. Furthermore the addition of NSAIDs delayed the onset of RAF inhibitor resistance, most likely by counteracting the upregulation of MITF. Our data suggest that selected NSAIDs could be a promising combination partner for MAPK pathway inhibitors for the treatment of BRAF^V600E mutated melanomas.

In vivo study of pro-inflammatory cytokine changes in serum and synovial fluid during treatment with celecoxib and etoricoxib and correlation with VAS pain change and synovial membrane penetration index in patients with inflammatory arthritis

Objectives

To determine the impact of celecoxib and etoricoxib therapy on serum and synovial fluid levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, sTNFR1, sTNFR2 and IL-1Ra in patients with inflammatory arthritis. To determine the correlation between cytokine changes and synovial membrane penetration index of the study drugs, and pain VAS change.

Methods

Fifty-one patients with inflammatory synovial fluid accumulation in a knee joint (33 women), randomized on 3 groups of 17 each: 100 mg b.i.d. celecoxib treated group, 90 mg o.d. etoricoxib treated group, and the control group with no NSAID treatment. Cytokines serum and synovial fluid levels as well as membrane penetration index were assessed prior and after treatment.

Results

Celecoxib led to decrease of both synovial fluid and serum levels of IL-6 (p=0.017 and p=0.003, respectively). In the etoricoxib treated group synovial fluid IL-6 concentration was significantly decreased after treatment (p=0.019). Correlating the study drugs penetration index with the change of cytokines and their receptors levels, positive correlation was found with the reduction of synovial fluid IL-1β for the celecoxib (p=0.032) and with the increase of synovial fluid sTNFR1 for the etoricoxib group (p=0.028). Pain VAS reduction was positively correlated with decrease of synovial fluid IL-1β (p=0.041) and IL-6 levels (p<0.005) and negative with synovial fluid sTNFR1 changes (p=0.045) in celecoxib group, and negative with serum TNF-α decrease (p=0.044) in the etoricoxib group.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that celecoxib and etoricoxib inhibit the inflammatory cytokines, mostly in synovial fluid but also in serum, causing through this mechanism, decrease of inflammation, irrespective to COX-2 inhibition.

Lumiracoxib metabolism in male C57bl/6J mice: characterisation of novel in vivo metabolites

1. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of lumiracoxib in male C57bl/6J mice were investigated following a single oral dose of 10 mg/kg. 2. Lumiracoxib achieved peak observed concentrations in the blood of 1.26 + 0.51 μg/mL 0.5 h (0.5-1.0) post-dose with an AUC_inf of 3.48 + 1.09 μg h/mL. Concentrations of lumiracoxib then declined with a terminal half-life of 1.54 + 0.31 h. 3. Metabolic profiling showed only the presence of unchanged lumiracoxib in blood by 24 h, while urine, bile and faecal extracts contained, in addition to the unchanged parent drug, large amounts of hydroxylated and conjugated metabolites. 4. No evidence was obtained in the mouse for the production of the downstream products of glutathione conjugation such as mercapturates, suggesting that the metabolism of the drug via quinone-imine generating pathways is not a major route of biotransformation in this species. Acyl glucuronidation appeared absent or a very minor route. 5. While there was significant overlap with reported human metabolites, a number of unique mouse metabolites were detected, particularly taurine conjugates of lumiracoxib and its oxidative metabolites.

Efficacy of Lumiracoxib in Osteoarthritis: A Review of Nine Studies

Lumiracoxib is a cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitor in development for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis and acute pain. We reviewed nine clinical studies of 1 − 52 weeks' duration demonstrating the efficacy of lumiracoxib in OA. Male and female patients aged ≥ 18 years with primary OA of the hand, hip or knee received lumiracoxib, placebo or active comparators (diclofenac, celecoxib or rofecoxib). Lumiracoxib provided consistent reductions in OA pain intensity and improvements in the patient's global assessment of disease activity and functional status (assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire or the Australian/Canadian OA Hand Index). These results were superior to placebo and similar to the active comparators tested. In addition, lumiracoxib was consistently superior to placebo and generally similar to active comparators in terms of the new Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials and Osteoarthritis Research Society International criteria. These were used to provide a single measure of response to treatment, taking into account pain, the patient's global assessment of disease activity and functional status.

Mitochondrial toxicity of selective COX-2 inhibitors via inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation (ATP synthesis) in rat liver mitochondria

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors (coxibs) are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) designed to selectively inhibit COX-2. However, drugs of this therapeutic class are associated with drug induced liver injury (DILI) and mitochondrial injury is likely to play a role. The effects of selective COX-2 inhibitors on inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation (ATP synthesis) in rat liver mitochondria were investigated. The order of potency of inhibition of ATP synthesis was: lumiracoxib (IC50: 6.48 ± 2.74 μM)>celecoxib (IC50: 14.92 ± 6.40 μM)>valdecoxib (IC50: 161.4 ± 28.6 μM)>rofecoxib (IC50: 238.4 ± 79.2 μM)>etoricoxib (IC50: 405.1 ± 116.3 μM). Mechanism based inhibition of ATP synthesis (Kinact 0.078 min(-1) and KI 21.46 μM and Kinact/KI ratio 0.0036 min(-1)μM(-1)) was shown by lumiracoxib and data suggest that the opening of the MPT pore may not be the mechanism of toxicity. A positive correlation (with r(2)=0.921) was observed between the potency of inhibition of ATP synthesis and the log P values. The in vitro metabolism of coxibs in rat liver mitochondria yielded for each drug substance a major single metabolite and identified a hydroxy metabolite with each of the coxibs and these metabolites did not alter the inhibition profile of ATP synthesis of the parent compound. The results suggest that coxibs themselves could be involved in the hepatotoxic action through inhibition of ATP synthesis.

Similar maximum systemic but not local cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition by 50 mg lumiracoxib and 90 mg etoricoxib: a randomized controlled trial in healthy subjects

PURPOSE

Once daily doses of 100-400 mg lumiracoxib have been proposed to inhibit local prostaglandin synthesis longer than systemic prostaglandin synthesis due to local accumulation in inflamed, acidic tissue. Lower, less toxic doses, however, might still achieve the clinical goal and merit further contemplation.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way cross-over study, 18 healthy men received, with an interval of 24 h, two oral doses of 50 mg lumiracoxib or for comparison, 90 mg etoricoxib, for which local tissue accumulation has not been claimed as therapeutic component. Systemic and local drug concentrations, assessed by means of subcutaneous in-vivo microdialysis, were related to COX-2 inhibiting effects, quantified as inhibition of prostaglandin ex-vivo production in whole blood as well as local tissue prostaglandin (PG) concentrations.

RESULTS

Twenty-four hours after the first dose, only etoricoxib was detectable in plasma and inhibited PGE2 production. In contrast, after the second dose, systemic PGE2 concentrations were significantly reduced by both coxibs, indicating similar maximum systemic effects of the selected doses. The local COX-2 inhibition by etoricoxib was most pronounced for PGD2. To the contrary, no indication was given of local inhibition of PG production by lumiracoxib at the dose tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Doses of 50 mg lumiracoxib and 90 mg etoricoxib produced similar maximum inhibition of systemic COX-2 function whereas 50 mg lumiracoxib was ineffective in producing local COX-2 inhibition. At a 50 mg dosage, lumiracoxib does not provide peripheral effects that outlast its systemic actions in therapies of rheumatic diseases such as osteoarthritis.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling for the determination of a cimicoxib dosing regimen in the dog

BACKGROUND

Cimicoxib is a new coxib anti-inflammatory drug for use in the dog. To determine a preclinical dosage regimen for cimicoxib in dog, a reversible model of kaolin-induced paw inflammation was used. Dosage regimens were established using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling approach (indirect response model).

RESULTS

Analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic endpoints investigated with the inflammation model established the efficacy of cimicoxib at a dose of 2 mg/kg administered orally (single dose) in 12 beagle dogs.For both the oral and IV route of administration two groups of dogs to be identified namely Poor Metabolizers (PM) and Extensive Metabolizers (EM).The terminal half-life after oral administration was 8.0 ± 0.6 h for the PM and 4.6 ± 2.6 h for the EM groups, with the corresponding values after the IV route being 5.6 ± 1.7 h and 2.7 ± 0.9 h (mean ± SD).The main pharmacodynamic parameters (potency, efficacy, and sensitivity) were estimated for four endpoints (body temperature, creeping speed, ground vertical reaction force and clinical lameness score). The plasma concentration corresponding to half the maximum of the indirect effect were 239 μg/L for creeping speed, 284 μg/L for the lameness score, 161 μg/L for the ground reaction vertical force and 193 μg/L for the body temperature.To document possible polymorphism of the cimicoxib disposition in the target dog population, cimicoxib was administered by the intravenous route to 40 dogs (four different sized breeds). The cimicoxib half-lives in these 40 dogs were of same order of the magnitude as those of the EM beagle dogs. Thus pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters obtained from the EM beagle dogs were selected to simulate the dose-effect relationship of cimicoxib after an oral administration allowing a dosage regimen to be selected for confirmation by a clinical trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Cimicoxib was an efficacious anti-inflammatory, antipyretic and analgesic drug and a dosage regimen of 2 mg/kg daily was determined for confirmatory clinical trials.

Lumiracoxib Does Not Affect the Ex Vivo Antiplatelet Aggregation Activity of Low-Dose Aspirin in Healthy Subjects

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the pharmacodynamic effects of concomitant low-dose aspirin and lumiracoxib in healthy subjects. Participants received lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily (n = 14) or placebo (n = 14) for 11 days, with concomitant low-dose aspirin (75 mg once daily) from days 5 to 11. Ex vivo pharmacodynamic assessments included assays of platelet aggregation and urinary thromboxane and prostacyclin metabolite profile. Arachidonic acid-stimulated platelet aggregation was reduced from 76.3% on day 4 to 4.8% on day 11 in the placebo group and from 75.8% on day 4 to 5.1% on day 11 in the lumiracoxib group. Collagen-induced platelet aggregation was reduced from 77.5% on day 4 to 52.8% on day 11 in the placebo group and from 79.5% on day 4 to 55.9% on day 11 in the lumiracoxib group. Urinary thromboxane and prostacyclin were unaffected by lumiracoxib. In conclusion, concomitant lumiracoxib did not interfere with the cyclooxygenase-1-mediated antiplatelet effects of low-dose aspirin.

Chromatographic techniques in analysis of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in drugs and biological samples

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, as a therapeutic class, are among the most often used active pharmaceutical ingredients in heath care in the world. They are mostly available without prescription and often used for treatment of fever and pain. An extensive research of the literature published in analytical and pharmaceutical chemistry journals has been conducted and the chromatographic methods which were used for the purity, stability and pharmacokinetic studies of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, in formulations and biological materials have been reviewed. The methodology for the analysis of selected drugs is very well documented and many examples are available in the literature. The common use of chromatographic techniques with various detection attachments provide possibility for monitoring of drugs in therapy.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of blood and joint synovial fluid concentrations of robenacoxib from healthy dogs and dogs with osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this population analysis was to characterize the pharmacokinetic properties of robenacoxib in blood and stifle joint synovial fluid of dogs.

METHODS

Data were obtained from two studies: 1) 8 healthy Beagle dogs in which an acute inflammation was induced by injection of urate crystals into one joint; 2) 95 dogs from various breeds diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA). Robenacoxib concentrations in blood and synovial fluid were measured using a validated HPLC-UV and LC-MS method. Non-linear mixed effects modeling was performed using NONMEM6.

RESULTS

A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with linear elimination was developed to describe blood concentrations of robenacoxib. Blood clearance in healthy animals was found to be 75% higher than in OA dogs. Synovial fluid concentrations were modeled using an effect-compartment-type model predicting longer residence times in OA dogs compared to healthy Beagles (e.g. concentrations above the IC(50) for COX-2, respectively, 16 h vs. 10 h at 1.5 mg/kg).

CONCLUSIONS

Robenacoxib was found to reside longer at the effect site (inflamed joint) compared to blood in both healthy and OA dogs. These results may explain the good efficacy observed with once-daily dosing in clinical trials and the high safety index of robenacoxib in dogs.

Inhibitory effect of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor lumiracoxib on human organic anion transporters hOAT1 and hOAT3

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) delay renal excretion of antifolate methotrexate by inhibiting human organic anion transporters hOAT1 (SLC22A6) and hOAT3 (SLC22A8). In this study, we performed uptake experiments using Xenopus laevis oocytes to assess the inhibitory effect of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors on hOAT1 and hOAT3. The uptake of methotrexate into oocytes was increased by the injection of hOAT1 and hOAT3 cRNA, and transport was strongly inhibited by lumiracoxib. The apparent 50% inhibitory concentrations of lumiracoxib were estimated to be 3.3 µM and 1.9 µM for uptake of p-aminohippurate by hOAT1 and of estrone sulfate by hOAT3, respectively. Eadie-Hofstee plot analysis showed that lumiracoxib inhibited hOAT1 and hOAT3 in a competitive manner. For other cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors celecoxib, etoricoxib, rofecoxib and valdecoxib, slight to moderate inhibition of hOAT3 only was observed. These findings show that lumiracoxib has inhibitory potential toward hOAT1 and hOAT3, comparable to that of nonselective NSAIDs.

Using pharmacokinetic principles to optimize pain therapy

Cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors are widely used to relieve musculoskeletal pain. These agents block the production of prostaglandins (PGs) at sites of inflammation by inhibiting the activity of two COX enzymes necessary for PG production and normal organ homeostasis. Inhibition of PG production at sites unrelated to pain is associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The degree of analgesic efficacy, as well as the incidence and the localization of ADRs, are critically influenced by the pharmacokinetics (absorption, distribution and elimination) of these drugs. Ideally, sufficient and permanent inhibition of COX enzymes should be achieved in target tissues, with minimal ADRs. To minimize underdosing or overdosing, which result in therapeutic failure or ADRs, the COX inhibitor with the most appropriate pharmacokinetic properties should be selected on the basis of a thorough pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis. In this Review, the pharmacokinetics of the prevailing COX inhibitors will be discussed and enigmatic aspects of these intensively used drugs will be considered.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the analgesic effects of lumiracoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, in rats

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study establishes a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to describe the time course and in vivo mechanisms of action of the antinociceptive effects of lumiracoxib, evaluated by the thermal hyperalgesia test in rats.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Female Wistar fasted rats were injected s.c. with saline or carrageenan in the right hind paw, followed by either 0, 1, 3, 10 or 30 mg*kg(-1) of oral lumiracoxib at the time of carrageenan injection (experiment I), or 0, 10 or 30 mg*kg(-1) oral lumiracoxib at 4 h after carrageenan injection (experiment II). Antihyperalgesic responses were measured as latency time (LT) to a thermal stimulus. PK/PD modelling of the antinociceptive response was performed using the population approach with NONMEM VI.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model described the plasma disposition. A first-order model, including lag time and decreased relative bioavailability as a function of the dose, described the absorption process. The response model was: LT=LT(0)/(1 +MED). LT(0) is the baseline response, and MED represents the level of inflammatory mediators. The time course of MED was assumed to be equivalent to the predicted profile of COX-2 activity and was modelled according to an indirect response model with a time variant synthesis rate. Drug effects were described as a reversible inhibition of the COX-2 activity. The in vivo estimate of the dissociation equilibrium constant of the COX-2-lumiracoxib complex was 0.24 microg*mL(-1).

CONCLUSIONS

The model developed appropriately described the time course of pharmacological responses to lumiracoxib, in terms of its mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics.

Use of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach in the cat to determine a dosage regimen for the COX-2 selective drug robenacoxib

This study investigated the analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic efficacy of the new COX-2 selective inhibitor robenacoxib in the cat and established pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters for these effects. Robenacoxib, at a dosage of 2 mg/kg administered subcutaneously, was evaluated in a kaolin-induced paw inflammation model in 10 cats, using both clinically relevant endpoints (lameness scoring, locomotion tests) and other indicators of inflammation (body and skin temperature, thermal pain threshold) to establish its pharmacological profile. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling approach, based on indirect response models, was used to describe the time course and magnitude of the responses to robenacoxib. All endpoints demonstrated good responsiveness to robenacoxib administration and both the magnitude and time courses of responses were well described by the indirect pharmacodynamic response models. Pharmacokinetic and clinically relevant pharmacodynamic parameters were used to simulate dosage regimens that will assist the planning of clinical trials and the selection of an optimal dosage regimen for robenacoxib in the cat.

A comparison of the blood pressure changes of lumiracoxib with those of ibuprofen and naproxen

The 52-week Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET) investigated the gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety profile of lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily compared with 2 traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): ibuprofen 800 mg 3 times daily and naproxen 500 mg twice daily. Data from TARGET were analyzed to examine the effect of lumiracoxib compared with ibuprofen and naproxen on blood pressure (BP), incidence of de novo and aggravated hypertension, prespecified edema events, and congestive heart failure. Lumiracoxib resulted in smaller changes in BP as early as week 4. Least-squares mean change from baseline at week 4 for systolic BP was +0.57 mm Hg with lumiracoxib compared with +3.14 mm Hg with ibuprofen (P<.0001) and +0.43 with lumiracoxib compared with +1.80 mm Hg with naproxen (P<.0001). In conclusion, the use of lumiracoxib and traditional NSAIDs results in differing BP changes; these might be of clinical relevance.

Effect on blood pressure of lumiracoxib versus ibuprofen in patients with osteoarthritis and controlled hypertension: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs vary in their impact on blood pressure and the effect of lumiracoxib 100 mg once daily has not been studied previously. To examine whether lumiracoxib 100 mg once daily would result in lower 24-h mean systolic ambulatory blood pressure than ibuprofen 600 mg three times daily in osteoarthritis patients with controlled hypertension, a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in 79 centres in nine countries.

METHODS

Hypertensive osteoarthritis patients of 50 years at least whose office blood pressure was less than 140/90 mmHg on stable antihypertensive treatment were randomized to lumiracoxib (n = 394) 100 mg once daily or ibuprofen 600 mg three times daily (n = 393) and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed at baseline and end of study. The primary outcome measure was a comparison of the change in 24-h mean systolic ambulatory blood pressure from baseline to week 4. Secondary analyses included other blood pressure-related endpoints and efficacy (pain) measurements.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, the 24-h mean systolic ambulatory blood pressure (least square mean) decreased in lumiracoxib-treated patients (-2.7 mmHg) and increased in ibuprofen-treated patients (+2.2 mmHg) at 4 weeks, estimated difference -5.0 mmHg (95% confidence interval -6.1 to -3.8) in favour of lumiracoxib. The 24-h mean diastolic ambulatory blood pressure changes were -1.5 mmHg (lumiracoxib), +0.5 mmHg (ibuprofen), difference -2.0 mmHg (95% confidence interval -2.7 to -1.3). Efficacy results were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with lumiracoxib 100 mg once daily resulted in clinically significant lower blood pressure compared with ibuprofen 600 mg three times daily in osteoarthritis patients with well controlled hypertension.

Less small-bowel injury with lumiracoxib compared with naproxen plus omeprazole

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor lumiracoxib has been shown to reduce endoscopically detected ulcers and ulcer complications in the upper gastrointestinal tract compared with nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. We investigated whether lumiracoxib would reduce small-bowel injury compared with naproxen plus omeprazole.

METHODS

Healthy volunteers were randomized to receive lumiracoxib 100 mg once daily, naproxen 500 mg twice daily plus omeprazole 20 mg once daily, or placebo in a 16-day double-blind, parallel-group study. Small-bowel mucosal injury and inflammation were assessed by video capsule endoscopy, the lactulose:L-rhamnose permeability assessment, and the fecal calprotectin test.

RESULTS

Of 152 randomized subjects, 139 completed the study with valid video capsule endoscopies (lumiracoxib, n = 47; naproxen plus omeprazole, n = 45; placebo, n = 47). Compared with placebo, an increased number of subjects on naproxen plus omeprazole had small-bowel mucosal breaks (77.8% vs 40.4%, P < .001), with increased permeability (P = .023) and increased fecal calprotectin (increase, 96.8 vs 14.5 mg/kg for placebo; P < .001). With lumiracoxib, 27.7% of subjects had small-bowel mucosal breaks (P = .196 vs placebo; P < .001 vs naproxen), there was no increase in permeability (P = .157 vs placebo; P = .364 vs naproxen), and no increase in fecal calprotectin (-5.7 mg/kg; P = .377 vs placebo; P < .001 vs naproxen).

CONCLUSIONS

As assessed by 3 different measures, acute small-bowel injury on lumiracoxib treatment is less frequent than with naproxen plus omeprazole and similar to placebo.

Drug insight: cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors--a critical appraisal

Following the withdrawal of rofecoxib and valdecoxib, the discussion concerning selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors was often characterized more by emotions than scientific evidence. In fact, the original rationale of these substances is still valid, in that selective COX2 inhibitors cause significantly fewer severe side effects in the gastrointestinal tract than traditional NSAIDs. Off-label long-term use of COX2 inhibitors in patients with a history of colorectal adenomas in well-designed, placebo-controlled trials showed that treatment with these agents is associated with an increased rate of cardiovascular adverse effects. Other studies have shown that both COX2 inhibitors and NSAIDs are associated with a similar cardiovascular risk, suggesting that there is presently no rationale for a further differentiation of these groups of drugs in terms of cardiovascular toxicity. Referring to the current debate, potential mechanisms underlying cardiovascular adverse effects associated with the long-term use of COX2 inhibitors and NSAIDs are discussed. Moreover, this Review summarizes the pharmacology of COX2 inhibitors with emphasis on their different pharmacokinetic characteristics.

Clinical use and pharmacological properties of selective COX-2 inhibitors

Selective COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) are approved for the relief of acute pain and symptoms of chronic inflammatory conditions such as osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). They have similar pharmacological properties but a slightly improved gastrointestinal (GI) safety profile if compared to traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (tNSAIDs). However, long-term use of coxibs can be associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) adverse events (AEs). For this reason, two coxibs were withdrawn from the market. Currently celecoxib, etoricoxib, and lumiracoxib are used. These three coxibs differ in their chemical structure and selectivity for COX-2, which might explain some of their pharmacological features. Following oral administration, the less lipophilic celecoxib has a lower bioavailability (20-40%) than the other two coxibs (74-100%). All are eliminated by hepatic metabolism involving mainly CYP2C9 (celecoxib, lumiracoxib) and CYP3A4 (etoricoxib). Elimination half-life varies from 5 to 8 h (lumiracoxib), 11 to 16 h (celecoxib) and 19 to 32 h (etoricoxib). In patients with liver disease, plasma levels of celecoxib and etoricoxib are increased about two-fold. Clinical efficacies of the coxibs are comparable to tNSAIDs. There is an ongoing discussion about whether the slightly better GI tolerability (which is lost if acetylsalicylic acid is coadministered) of the coxibs is offset by their elevated risks for CV AEs (also seen with tNSAIDs other than naproxen), which apparently increase with dose and duration of exposure. In addition, the higher costs for coxibs (if compared to tNSAIDs, even when a "gastroprotective" proton pump inhibitor is coadministered) should be taken into consideration, if a coxib will be selected for certain patients with a high risk for GI complications. For such treatment, the lowest effective dose should be used for a limited time. Monitoring of kidney function and blood pressure appears advisable. It is hoped that further controlled studies can better define the therapeutic place of the coxibs.

Lumiracoxib in the management of osteoarthritis and acute pain

Lumiracoxib is a highly selective COX-2 inhibitor with a novel chemical structure and a relatively short plasma half-life. It has been approved in > 40 countries for the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis and/or acute pain related to primary dysmenorrhoea and dental or orthopaedic surgery. In these conditions, lumiracoxib has proved to be as effective as standard doses of conventional NSAIDs and other COX-2 selective inhibitors (coxibs). According to the Therapeutic Arthritis Research Gastrointestinal Trial, which enrolled 18,325 patients with osteoarthritis, lumiracoxib 400 mg/day (four times its recommended dosage) was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of ulcer complications compared with naproxen 1000 mg/day and ibuprofen 2400 mg/day, at least in the population not taking low-dose aspirin. The atherothrombotic potential of NSAIDs, especially coxibs, has been much debated. In this respect, available data do not suggest that lumiracoxib may be associated with an increased hazard of cardiovascular events compared with non-selective NSAIDs. Finally, lumiracoxib may be an effective and safe drug provided both physicians and patients will comply with its approved indications and contraindications.

Effect of risk factors on complicated and uncomplicated ulcers in the TARGET lumiracoxib outcomes study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors were developed to reduce the gastrointestinal risk associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial was the largest study to evaluate primarily the gastrointestinal safety outcomes of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Data from the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial were used to identify risk factors and investigate the safety of lumiracoxib in subgroups.

METHODS

Patients with osteoarthritis (age, >or=50 y) were randomized to receive lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily, naproxen 500 mg twice daily, or ibuprofen 800 mg 3 times daily for 12 months. Events were categorized by a blinded adjudication committee. The primary end point was all definite or probable ulcer complications.

RESULTS

For patients taking NSAIDs, factors associated with an increased risk of ulcer complications were age 65 years or older (hazard ratio [HR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-3.59), previous history of gastrointestinal bleed or ulcer (HR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.86-7.00), non-Caucasian racial origin (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.35-3.27), and male sex (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.08-2.68). With lumiracoxib, significant risk factors were age 65 years or older (HR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.40-7.20), male sex (HR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.25-5.40), non-Caucasian racial origin (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.02-4.59), and concomitant aspirin use (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.40-5.97). Increased risks in patients age 65 years and older were increased further if other risk factors were present. Lumiracoxib maintained an advantage over NSAIDs across all subgroups except aspirin use.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumiracoxib was associated with a reduced risk of ulcer complications compared with NSAIDs in all significant subgroups except aspirin users.

Clinical pharmacology of lumiracoxib: a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor

Lumiracoxib (Prexige) is a selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor developed for the treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and acute pain. Lumiracoxib possesses a carboxylic acid group that makes it weakly acidic (acid dissociation constant [pKa] 4.7), distinguishing it from other selective COX-2 inhibitors. Lumiracoxib has good oral bioavailability (74%). It is rapidly absorbed, reaching maximum plasma concentrations 2 hours after dosing, and is highly plasma protein bound. Lumiracoxib has a short elimination half-life from plasma (mean 4 hours) and demonstrates dose-proportional plasma pharmacokinetics with no accumulation during multiple dosing. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, peak lumiracoxib synovial fluid concentrations occur 3-4 hours later than in plasma and exceed plasma concentrations from 5 hours after dosing to the end of the 24-hour dosing interval. These data suggest that lumiracoxib may be associated with reduced systemic exposure, while still reaching sites where COX-2 inhibition is required for pain relief. Lumiracoxib is metabolised extensively prior to excretion, with only a small amount excreted unchanged in urine or faeces. Lumiracoxib and its metabolites are excreted via renal and faecal routes in approximately equal amounts. The major metabolic pathways identified involve oxidation of the 5-methyl group of lumiracoxib and/or hydroxylation of its dihaloaromatic ring. Major metabolites of lumiracoxib in plasma are the 5-carboxy, 4'-hydroxy and 4'-hydroxy-5-carboxy derivatives, of which only the 4'-hydroxy derivative is active and COX-2 selective. In vitro, the major oxidative pathways are catalysed primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 with very minor contribution from CYP1A2 and CYP2C19. However, in patients genotyped as poor CYP2C9 metabolisers, exposure to lumiracoxib (area under the plasma concentration-time curve) is not significantly increased compared with control subjects, indicating no requirement for adjustment of lumiracoxib dose in these subjects. Lumiracoxib is selective for COX-2 compared with COX-1 in the human whole blood assay with a ratio of 515 : 1 in healthy subjects and in patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. COX-2 selectivity was confirmed by a lack of inhibition of arachidonic acid and collagen-induced platelet aggregation. COX-2 selectivity of lumiracoxib is associated with a reduced incidence of gastroduodenal erosions compared with naproxen and a lack of effect on both small and large bowel permeability. Lumiracoxib does not exhibit any clinically meaningful interactions with a range of commonly used medications including aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), fluconazole, an ethinylestradiol- and levonorgestrel-containing oral contraceptive, omeprazole, the antacid Maalox, methotrexate and warfarin (although, as in common practice, routine monitoring of coagulation is recommended when lumiracoxib is co-administered with warfarin). As such, dose adjustments are not required when co-administering these agents with lumiracoxib. In addition, moderate hepatic impairment and mild to moderate renal impairment do not appear to influence lumiracoxib exposure.

First-dose analgesic effect of the cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitor lumiracoxib in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with celecoxib [NCT00267215]

Cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors are frequently used to manage osteoarthritis. We compared the analgesic efficacy of the novel cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitor lumiracoxib (Prexige^®) versus placebo and celecoxib in patients with knee osteoarthritis. This seven day, double-blind, placebo and active comparator controlled, parallel group study included 364 patients aged ≥50 years with moderate-to-severe symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Patients received lumiracoxib 400 mg/day (four times the recommended chronic dose in osteoarthritis; n = 144), placebo (n = 75), or celecoxib 200 mg twice daily (n = 145). The primary variable was actual pain intensity difference (100 mm visual–analogue scale) between baseline and the mean of three hour and five hour assessments after the first dose. Actual pain intensity difference, average and worst pain, pain relief and functional status (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC™]) were measured over seven days. Patients also completed a global evaluation of treatment effect at study end or premature discontinuation. For the primary variable, the superiority of lumiracoxib versus placebo, the noninferiority of lumiracoxib versus celecoxib, and the superiority of lumiracoxib versus celecoxib were assessed by closed test procedure adjusting for multiplicity, thereby maintaining the overall 5% significance level. In addition, celecoxib was assessed versus placebo in a predefined exploratory manner to assess trial sensitivity. Lumiracoxib provided better analgesia than placebo 3–5 hours after the first dose (P = 0.004) through to study end. The estimated difference between lumiracoxib and celecoxib 3–5 hours after the first dose was not significant (P = 0.185). Celecoxib was not significantly different from placebo in this analysis (P = 0.069). At study end 13.9% of lumiracoxib-treated patients reported complete pain relief versus 5.5% and 5.3% of celecoxib and placebo recipients, respectively. WOMAC™ total and subscales improved for both active treatments versus placebo except for difficulty in performing daily activities, for which celecoxib just failed to achieve significance (P = 0.056). In the patient's global evaluation of treatment effect, 58.1% of patients receiving lumiracoxib rated treatment as 'excellent' or 'good', versus 48.6% of celecoxib and 25.3% of placebo patients. Lumiracoxib was well tolerated. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups.

A validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for determination of lumiracoxib in human plasma

Lumiracoxib {2-[(2-fluoro-6-chlorophenyl)amino]-5-methyl-benzeneacetic acid} is a highly selective and potent cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, which is chemically distinct from other coxibs in that it contains a carboxylic group and is weakly acidic. In the present study, a liquid-liquid extraction-based reversed-phase HPLC method with UV detection was validated and applied for the analysis of lumiracoxib in human plasma. The analyte was separated on a reversed-phase column with acetonitrile and 0.05% trichloracetic acid in water (35:65, v/v) as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL/min, and UV detection at 270 nm. The retention times for lumiracoxib and niflumic acid (internal standard) were 16.9 and 10.4 min, respectively. The validated quantitation range for lumiracoxib was 10-10,000 ng/mL. The developed procedure was applied to assess the pharmacokinetics of lumiracoxib following administration of a single oral 200 mg dose to a healthy male volunteer.

Biological basis for the cardiovascular consequences of COX-2 inhibition: therapeutic challenges and opportunities

Inhibitors selective for prostaglandin G/H synthase-2 (PGHS-2) (known colloquially as COX-2) were designed to minimize gastrointestinal complications of traditional NSAIDs--adverse effects attributed to suppression of COX-1-derived PGE2 and prostacyclin (PGI2). Evidence from 2 randomized controlled-outcome trials (RCTs) of 2 structurally distinct selective inhibitors of COX-2 supports this hypothesis. However, 5 RCTs of 3 structurally distinct inhibitors also indicate that such compounds elevate the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. The clinical information is biologically plausible, as it is compatible with evidence that inhibition of COX-2-derived PGI2 removes a protective constraint on thrombogenesis, hypertension, and atherogenesis in vivo. However, the concept of simply tipping a "balance" between COX-2-derived PGI2 and COX-1-derived platelet thromboxane is misplaced. Among the questions that remain to be addressed are the following: (a) whether this hazard extends to all or some of the traditional NSAIDs; (b) whether adjuvant therapies, such as low-dose aspirin, will mitigate the hazard and if so, at what cost; (c) whether COX-2 inhibitors result in cardiovascular risk transformation during chronic dosing; and (d) how we might identify individuals most likely to benefit or suffer from such drugs in the future.

ORAL ADMINISTRATION OF LUMIRACOXIB REDUCES CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULAR MEMBRANE DEVELOPMENT IN THE RAT LASER-TRAUMA MODEL

PURPOSE

To determine whether lumiracoxib, a highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor that exhibits anti-inflammatory and antiangiogenic properties, can inhibit experimental choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM) development induced by focal laser trauma in a well-characterized Brown Norway rat CNVM model.

METHODS

Over a 35-day period, 24 rats received daily oral gavage dosages of 20 mg/kg lumiracoxib in a 0.5% (w/v) suspension of sodium carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), while a control group received the 0.5% CMC suspension only. After 7 days, eight laser photocoagulation sites were placed concentrically around the optic disk to induce CNVMs. Thirty-five days later, fundus photography and fluorescein angiography (FA) were performed and eyes were processed for histopathologic analysis.

RESULTS

Masked FA grading of lesion sites revealed a small, but statistically significant difference (P<0.0001) in late stage staining intensity and leakage between the mean group scores of treated (1.4) and control (1.7) eyes. Histopathologic analysis demonstrated that the mean CNVM thickness +/- SD of 38 +/-19 microm (n=24 eyes, 175 photocoagulation sites) in the lumiracoxib-treated animals was reduced by 30% (P<0.001) compared to the CNVM mean thickness+/- SD of 54+/- 20 microm (n=24 eyes, 171 photocoagulation sites) in the control animals.

CONCLUSION

Systemic administration of the selective COX-2 inhibitor lumiracoxib results in a partial but significant reduction in CNVM development in the rat laser-trauma model and thus may be clinically beneficial as a potential inhibitor of CNVM formation in exudative age-related macular degeneration.

The post-operative analgesic efficacy and tolerability of lumiracoxib compared with placebo and naproxen after total knee or hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Lumiracoxib is a novel selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor in development for the treatment of chronic and acute pain.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind multicentre study enrolled 180 patients (aged 18-80 years) with moderate-to-severe pain (>or=2 on a 4-point categorical scale) within 48 h of unilateral total knee or total hip arthroplasty. Patients were randomized to receive lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily (n = 60), placebo (n = 60) or naproxen 500 mg twice daily (n = 60). The study consisted of a 12-h single-dose phase followed by a multiple-dose phase (up to 96 h or until discontinuation). The primary efficacy measure was the summed (time-weighted) pain intensity difference over 0-8 h after the first dose (SPID-8).

RESULTS

Lumiracoxib and naproxen were comparable and both treatments were superior to placebo for the primary efficacy measure, SPID-8. Both treatments were generally similar and also superior to placebo for the secondary efficacy measures during both the single- and multiple-dose phases for up to 96 h. Both active treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Lumiracoxib is an effective alternative to traditional non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the treatment of post-operative pain.

Lumiracoxib is effective in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a prospective randomized 13-week study versus placebo and celecoxib

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of lumiracoxib compared with placebo and celecoxib in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Following a 3- to 7-day washout period for previous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 1,600 patients aged >or=18 years with primary knee OA were randomized to receive lumiracoxib 200 or 400 mg once daily (o.d.), celecoxib 200 mg o.d. or placebo for 13 weeks. Primary efficacy variables were OA pain intensity in the target knee, patient's global assessment of disease activity and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale and total scores at week 13. Secondary variables included OA pain intensity in the target knee and physician's and patient's global assessments of disease activity by visit. Exploratory analysis of responder rates using the Outcomes Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) criteria was performed. Safety and tolerability were assessed. Lumiracoxib was superior to placebo in all primary and secondary variables and was generally similar to celecoxib. There were no statistically significant differences between the two doses of lumiracoxib. All active treatments were significantly more effective than placebo at weeks 2 and 13 in terms of response to treatment assessed using OMERACT-OARSI criteria. The incidence of adverse events was similar across the groups. Lumiracoxib 200 mg o.d. is a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for OA of the knee, providing pain relief and improved functional status with efficacy superior to placebo and similar to celecoxib. Lumiracoxib demonstrated a tolerability profile similar to placebo and celecoxib.

Pharmacodynamic behaviour of the selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor lumiracoxib in the lipopolysaccharide-stimulated rat air pouch model

PURPOSE

To investigate the pharmacodynamic behaviour of the selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, lumiracoxib, in the rat air pouch.

METHODS

Air pouches were injected with lipopolysaccharide to stimulate prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production 1h after lumiracoxib treatment. Pouch fluid samples were collected 6 or 24 h after lumiracoxib administration to measure PGE2 levels. Lumiracoxib concentrations in pouch fluid and plasma were measured by mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Oral administration of lumiracoxib resulted in dose-dependent inhibition of PGE2 production 6 and 24 h post-dose. The estimated ED50 values for inhibition of PGE2 production were 0.1 and 2.0 mg/kg at 6 and 24 h, respectively. Lumiracoxib concentrations in plasma and pouch fluid increased in proportion to dose. There was a strong positive correlation between lumiracoxib concentrations in plasma and pouch fluid compartments. Lumiracoxib concentrations were higher in plasma than in pouch fluid 6 h post-dose, but at 24 h post-dose, pouch fluid concentrations were > or =4-fold greater than plasma concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumiracoxib readily enters the air pouch and persists in this extravascular compartment for a longer period of time than in plasma. This distribution profile may contribute to the ability of lumiracoxib to inhibit PGE2 production up to 24 h after dosing.

Preclinical pharmacology of lumiracoxib: a novel selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2

1. This manuscript presents the preclinical profile of lumiracoxib, a novel cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitor. 2. Lumiracoxib inhibited purified COX-1 and COX-2 with K(i) values of 3 and 0.06 microM, respectively. In cellular assays, lumiracoxib had an IC(50) of 0.14 microM in COX-2-expressing dermal fibroblasts, but caused no inhibition of COX-1 at concentrations up to 30 microM (HEK 293 cells transfected with human COX-1). 3. In a human whole blood assay, IC(50) values for lumiracoxib were 0.13 microM for COX-2 and 67 microM for COX-1 (COX-1/COX-2 selectivity ratio 515). 4. Lumiracoxib was rapidly absorbed following oral administration in rats with peak plasma levels being reached between 0.5 and 1 h. 5. Ex vivo, lumiracoxib inhibited COX-1-derived thromboxane B(2) (TxB(2)) generation with an ID(50) of 33 mg kg(-1), whereas COX-2-derived production of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) in the lipopolysaccharide-stimulated rat air pouch was inhibited with an ID(50) value of 0.24 mg kg(-1). 6. Efficacy of lumiracoxib in rat models of hyperalgesia, oedema, pyresis and arthritis was dose-dependent and similar to diclofenac. However, consistent with its low COX-1 inhibitory activity, lumiracoxib at a dose of 100 mg kg(-1) orally caused no ulcers and was significantly less ulcerogenic than diclofenac (P<0.05). 7. Lumiracoxib is a highly selective COX-2 inhibitor with anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic activities comparable with diclofenac, the reference NSAID, but with much improved gastrointestinal safety.

Clinical pharmacology of lumiracoxib, a second-generation cyclooxygenase 2 selective inhibitor

Although highly selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors have been shown to be less toxic to the gastrointestinal tract than conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), their overall safety profile is questioned. Since different selective COX-2 inhibitors were found to be associated with increased cardiovascular thrombotic events, the thrombotic hazard may be a class effect. Furthermore, warnings have been issued regarding serious skin and hypersensitivity reactions associated with valdecoxib. Lumiracoxib is a novel COX-2 selective inhibitor (coxib) with improved biochemical selectivity over that of currently available coxibs. It is structurally distinct from other drugs in the class and has weakly acidic properties. Clinical studies support a once-daily dosing regimen, despite its relatively short plasma elimination half-life (3 - 6 h). In randomised, controlled clinical trials, lumiracoxib 100 - 200 mg/day has been shown to be superior to placebo in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis, with clinical efficacy similar to diclofenac 150 mg/day, celecoxib 200 mg/day or rofecoxib 25 mg/day. Furthermore, lumiracoxib 200 - 400 mg/day appeared to be effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In patients with acute pain related to primary dysmenorrhoea, dental or orthopaedic surgery, lumiracoxib 400 mg/day was found to be at least as effective as standard doses of traditional NSAIDs and other coxibs. Endoscopic studies have indicated that lumiracoxib is associated with a rate of gastroduodenal ulcer formation that is significantly lower than with ibuprofen and does not differ from celecoxib. In the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Trial, which enrolled 18,325 patients with osteoarthritis, the cumulative 1-year incidence of ulcer complications (primary end point) was significantly reduced by approximately threefold on lumiracoxib 400 mg/day compared with naproxen 1000 mg/day or ibuprofen 2400 mg/day (0.32 versus 0.91%). Reduction in ulcer complications was more pronounced in the population not taking low-dose aspirin (0.2 versus 0.92%, respectively). Conversely, the gastrointestinal advantage of lumiracoxib was abrogated in patients receiving low-dose aspirin (0.69 versus 0.88%, respectively, p = 0.49). Regarding cardiovascular events contributing to the trialists' composite end point (myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death), there was no significant difference between lumiracoxib (0.65%) versus combined comparator NSAIDs (0.55%). Similarly, no significant difference was recorded in rates of myocardial infarction (clinical and silent) between the lumiracoxib (0.25%) and the combined NSAID (0.19%) treatment groups. Liver function test abnormalities were more frequent with lumiracoxib (2.57%) than with the comparator NSAIDs (0.63%). Whether or not this would result in an increased risk of clinical hepatitis in the real world setting is unforeseeable.

Lumiracoxib in the treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and acute postoperative dental pain: results of three dose-response studies

OBJECTIVES

Overview of three dose-response studies demonstrating the efficacy of lumiracoxib, a novel COX-2 selective inhibitor, for chronic pain associated with osteoarthritis (0A), or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and acute pain following dental extraction.

METHODS

OA and RA: 4-week, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled studies of similar design. Patients (OA, n = 583; RA, n = 571) received lumiracoxib 50 mg, 100 mg or 200 mg twice daily (bid), lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily (od), diclofenac 75 mg bid or placebo. Dental: 12-h, single-center, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled study. Patients (n = 202) received single oral doses of lumiracoxib 100 mg or 400 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

OA: pain intensity (PI) in the target joint (visual analogue scale [VAS]) and WOMAC score at Week 4; RA: overall PI (VAS) and ACR20 response at Week 4; Dental: difference (PID, categorical and VAS) score over 12h post dose, time to onset of analgesia.

RESULTS

Throughout the OA study, all lumiracoxib doses provided superior reductions in PI versus placebo and at Week 4, all lumiracoxib doses provided efficacy similar to each other and to diclofenac. In the RA study, lumiracoxib 100 mg bid, 200 mg bid and 400mg od were significantly better than placebo in PI at Weeks 1 and 2 (all p < 0.05) but demonstrated borderline significance at Week 4 (lumiracoxib 400 mg od, p = 0.06). In pain following dental surgery, PID scores for both lumiracoxib doses were superior to placebo from 1.5 h onwards and always comparable, or superior, to ibuprofen. Lumiracoxib 400 mg had the fastest onset of analgesia, measured as median time to confirmed first perceptible pain relief using the two-stopwatch method (37.4 min, superiority versus placebo, p < 0.001). Lumiracoxib was well tolerated in all studies.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies provide initial evidence that lumiracoxib is an effective, well-tolerated agent for the treatment of chronic and acute pain.

Efficacy and tolerability of lumiracoxib in the treatmentof osteoarthritis of the knee: A 13-week, randomized, double-blind comparison with celecoxib and placebo

BACKGROUND

Lumiracoxib is a cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitor developed for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis, and acute pain.

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of lumiracoxib 100 mg QD compared with celecoxib and placebo in patients with OA of the knee.

METHODS

In this 13-week, double-blind, double-dummy,placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, patients with primary OA of the knee and pain intensity in the target knee a 40 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale after a 3- to 7-day washout of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were randomized to receive lumiracoxib 100 mg QD, lumiracoxib 100 mg QD with a loading dose of lumiracoxib 200 mg QD for the first 2 weeks, celecoxib 200 mg QD, or placebo. Three primary efficacy variables were assessed at the end of the study: pain intensity in the target knee, the patient's global assessment of disease activity, and functional status (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index total score). In addition, the treatment response was assessed using the Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT OARSI) criteria. The safety profile and tolerability of all treatments were also examined.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 1551 patients (primarily white; 62% female; mean age, 60.5 years): 391 were randomized to receive lumiracoxib 100 mg QD, 385 lumiracoxib 100 mg QD with a loading dose, 393 celecoxib 200 mg QD, and 382 placebo. Treatment groups were closely balanced at baseline with respect to demographic and disease characteristics. Lumiracoxib was superior to placebo (P < 0.001) and similar to celecoxib on all primary efficacy variables. Reductions in pain intensity in the target knee were similar in the 2 lumiracoxib groups at week 13 (estimated least square mean difference vs placebo: -6.7 and -8.1 mm for lumiracoxib 100 mg QD and lumiracoxib 100 mg QD with loading dose, respectively; both, P < 0.001); with celecoxib, the estimated least square mean difference was -5.7 mm (P < 0.001). Significant differences compared with placebo were seen in all variables starting at week 2 for all active treatments (all, P < 0.001). No significant differences were seen between the lumiracoxib groups at any time point. Based on OMERACT OARSI criteria, all active treatments were superior to placebo (all, P < 0.001). Lumiracoxib and celecoxib were well tolerated, with an incidence of adverse events similar to that with placebo (64.7% lumiracoxib 100 mg QD, 67.0% lumiracoxib 100 mg QD with loading dose, 58.8% celecoxib, 58.4% placebo).

CONCLUSION

In this population of patients with OA of the knee, lumiracoxib 100 mg QD was of similar efficacy to celecoxib 200 mg QD and had similar tolerability to placebo.

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of lumiracoxib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

A randomised, double-blind study was performed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of lumiracoxib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients received lumiracoxib 200mg once daily (o.d.) (n= 280), lumiracoxib 400mg o.d. (n= 281), naproxen 500 mg twice daily (n= 279) or placebo (n= 284) for 26 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was response to treatment according to ACR20 criteria (adjusted for prohibited concomitant or excessive rescue medication use and discontinuations due to unsatisfactory therapeutic response) at week 13. Safety and tolerability was also assessed. Significantly more patients receiving lumiracoxib than placebo were responders according to ACR20 criteria at week 13 (41.1 and 42.7% for lumiracoxib 200 and 400 mg o.d., respectively; 32.4% for placebo; both p < 0.05). The proportion responding to naproxen (39.1%) was not significantly different from placebo. Prespecified gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent with naproxen than with either lumiracoxib dose or placebo. Lumiracoxib is therefore an effective and well-tolerated therapy for RA.

Efficacy and safety of four doses of lumiracoxib versus diclofenac in patients with knee or hip primary osteoarthritis: a phase II, four-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of the novel cyclooxygenase 2-selective inhibitor lumiracoxib with placebo and diclofenac in osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Adults (n=583) with knee or hip OA were randomized to receive for 4 weeks lumiracoxib 50, 100, or 200 mg twice daily or 400 mg once daily; placebo; or diclofenac 75 mg twice daily. Efficacy assessments included overall joint pain intensity and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index subscales; tolerability was evaluated by adverse event and physician reporting.

RESULTS

All lumiracoxib doses were superior to placebo in relieving pain, improving stiffness, and improving physical function after 4 weeks. At study endpoint, pain relief was comparable among all lumiracoxib dosages and similar to diclofenac. Lumiracoxib tolerability was superior to diclofenac and comparable to placebo.

CONCLUSION

Lumiracoxib provides predictable and sustained relief from pain, stiffness, and impaired physical function in OA. Lumiracoxib shows clinically comparable efficacy and superior tolerability to diclofenac.

Lumiracoxib is effective in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a 13 week, randomised, double blind study versus placebo and celecoxib

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of lumiracoxib with placebo and celecoxib for osteoarthritis OA in a 13 week, multicentre, randomised, double blind study.

METHODS

After a 37 day washout period for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, 1702 patients with knee OA were randomised to lumiracoxib 200 or 400 mg once daily od, celecoxib 200 mg od, or placebo 2221. A visual analogue scale VAS pain intensity > or =40 mm was required. Primary efficacy variables were OA pain intensity VAS mm in the target knee, patients global assessment of disease activity VAS mm, and WOMAC pain subscale and total scores at 13 weeks. OA pain intensity, patients and physicians global assessment of disease activity, and WOMAC total and all subscale scores were analysed by visit as secondary variables.

RESULTS

Lumiracoxib showed significant improvements in all primary and secondary variables compared with placebo. Lumiracoxib 200 mg od and celecoxib 200 mg od achieved similar improvements in OA pain intensity and functional status. Lumiracoxib 400 mg od demonstrated better efficacy for OA pain intensity and patients global assessment of disease activity at weeks 2, 4, and 8 and similar efficacy at week 13 compared with celecoxib 200 mg od. The incidence of adverse events AEs, serious AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs was similar in each group.

CONCLUSION

Lumiracoxib demonstrated significant improvement in OA pain intensity, patients global assessment of disease activity, and the WOMAC pain subscale and total scores compared with placebo. Lumiracoxib was well tolerated in this study, with overall tolerability similar to that of placebo and celecoxib.