Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy and gastric side effects. Does nabumetone provide a solution?

Mono- and multisite solid catalysts in cascade reactions for chemical process intensification

Catscade reactions: Heterogeneous catalysis can enable sustainability by carrying out multistep reactions in one step. It is shown that single- and multisite solid catalysts can be designed to carry out cascade reactions for the synthesis of fine chemicals.

Nabumetone: therapeutic use and safety profile in the management of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

Nabumetone is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory prodrug, which exerts its pharmacological effects via the metabolite 6-methoxy-2-naphthylacetic acid (6-MNA). Nabumetone itself is non-acidic and, following absorption, it undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism to form the main circulating active metabolite (6-MNA) which is a much more potent inhibitor of preferentially cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2. The three major metabolic pathways of nabumetone are O-demethylation, reduction of the ketone to an alcohol, and an oxidative cleavage of the side-chain occurs to yield acetic acid derivatives. Essentially no unchanged nabumetone and < 1% of the major 6-MNA metabolite are excreted unchanged in the urine from which 80% of the dose can be recovered and another 10% in faeces. Nabumetone is clinically used mainly for the management of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to reduce pain and inflammation. The clinical efficacy of nabumetone has also been evaluated in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, soft tissue injuries and juvenile RA. The optimum oral dosage of nabumetone for OA patients is 1 g once daily, which is well tolerated. The therapeutic response is superior to placebo and similar to nonselective COX inhibitors. In RA patients, nabumetone 1 g at bedtime is optimal, but an additional 0.5-1 g can be administered in the morning for patients with persistent symptoms. In RA, nabumetone has shown a comparable clinical efficacy to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), diclofenac, piroxicam, ibuprofen and naproxen. Clinical trials and a decade of worldwide safety data and long-term postmarketing surveillance studies show that nabumetone is generally well tolerated. The most frequent adverse effects are those commonly seen with COX inhibitors, which include diarrhoea, dyspepsia, headache, abdominal pain and nausea. In common with other COX inhibitors, nabumetone may increase the risk of GI perforations, ulcerations and bleedings (PUBs). However, several studies show a low incidence of PUBs, and on a par with the numbers reported from studies with COX-2 selective inhibitors and considerably lower than for nonselective COX inhibitors. This has been attributed mainly to the non-acidic chemical properties of nabumetone but also to its COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor profile. Through its metabolite 6-MNA, nabumetone has a dose-related effect on platelet aggregation, but no effect on bleeding time in clinical studies. Furthermore, several short-term studies have shown little to no effect on renal function. Compared with COX-2 selective inhibitors, nabumetone exhibits similar anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties in patients with arthritis and there is no evidence of excess GI or other forms of complications to date.

Efficacy and Safety of Rofecoxib 12.5 mg Versus Nabumetone 1,000 mg in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of starting doses of rofecoxib and nabumetone in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.

DESIGN

A 6-week, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

One hundred thirteen outpatient sites in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1,042 male and female patients aged 40 and older with OA of the knee (>6 months).

INTERVENTIONS

Rofecoxib 12.5 mg once a day (n=424), nabumetone 1,000 mg once a day (n=410), or placebo (n=208) for 6 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary efficacy endpoint was patient global assessment of response to therapy (PGART) over 6 weeks, which was also specifically evaluated over the first 6 days. The main safety measure was adverse events during the 6 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients with a good or excellent response to therapy as assessed using PGART at Week 6 was significantly higher with rofecoxib (55.4%) than nabumetone (47.5%; P=.018) or placebo (26.7%; P<.001 vs rofecoxib or nabumetone). Median time to first report of a good or excellent PGART response was significantly shorter in patients treated with rofecoxib (2 days) than with nabumetone (4 days, P=.002) and placebo (>5 days, P<.001) (nabumetone vs placebo; P=.007). The safety profiles of rofecoxib and nabumetone were generally similar, including gastrointestinal, hypertensive, and renal adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Rofecoxib 12.5 mg daily demonstrated better efficacy over 6 weeks of treatment and quicker onset of OA efficacy over the first 6 days than nabumetone 1,000 mg daily. Both therapies were generally well tolerated.

Evidence for the involvement of cyclooxygenase activity in the development of cocaine sensitization

Phospholipase A2 (PLA(2)) activation generates the release of arachidonic acid (AA) and platelet-activating factor (PAF), two compounds which may be involved in neuroplasticity. In previous studies, we found that PLA(2) activation is involved in the development of stimulant sensitization. In the present study, we have examined the roles of AA and PAF in the development of stimulant sensitization using agonists and antagonists selective for PAF receptors or the induction of various AA cascade-mediated eicosanoids. Sprague-Dawley rats were treated for 5 days with cocaine (30 mg/kg) or D-amphetamine (1 mg/kg) preceded 15 min earlier by various antagonists, and then tested following a 10-day withdrawal period for cocaine (15 mg/kg) or D-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg)-induced locomotion. Consistent with our earlier work, pretreatment with the PLA(2) inhibitor quinacrine (25 mg/kg) blocked the development of cocaine and amphetamine sensitization. The lipoxygenase (LOX) inhibitors nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA) (5-10 mg/kg) and MK-886 (1 mg/kg) had no effect on cocaine sensitization. The PAF receptor antagonist WEB 2086 (5-10 mg/kg) reduced the development of cocaine sensitization. The cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors indomethacin (1-2 mg/kg), piroxicam (0.5-1 mg/kg), 6-methoxy-2-napthylacetic acid (6-MNA; 0.5-1 mg/kg), and NS-398 (0.5-1 mg/kg) blocked the development of cocaine sensitization. The COX inhibitors indomethacin (2 mg/kg) and 6-MNA (1 mg/kg) also reduced the development of amphetamine sensitization. Rats were administered bilateral intraventral tegmental area (VTA) injections of D-amphetamine (5 microg/side) or saline coadministered with indomethacin (0.5 microg/side) or vehicle three times over 5 days and were then tested after a 10-day withdrawal for D-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg ip)-induced locomotion. Intra-VTA amphetamine induced a robust form of amphetamine sensitization, which was blocked by coadministration of indomethacin. Unilateral intra-VTA injections of PAF (1 microg) did not significantly alter cocaine (15 mg/kg ip)-induced locomotion when tested after a 3-day withdrawal. These findings suggest that COX, and possibly PAF, activity is involved in the development of stimulant sensitization. Neuroanatomical studies demonstrate that this may occur at the level of the VTA.

NSAIDs, gastrointestinal injury, and cytoprotection

Gastrointestinal toxicity caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is the most frequent drug side effect in the United States. NSAIDs are implicated in the development of complicated peptic ulcer disease and injury to the small bowel and colon. NSAIDs interfere with prostaglandin-mediated epithelial defense mechanisms and also cause direct epithelial toxicity. Current and future approaches to the prevention and management of NSAID injury are reviewed.

Influence of the xanthine derivative denbufylline and the anti-inflammatory agent nabumetone on microsomal free radical production and lipid peroxidation in rat liver

The influence of denbufylline, nabumetone and its main metabolite BRL 10,720 on iron stimulated lipid peroxidation (LPO), cytochrome P 450 dependent H2O2 and chemiluminescence (CL) production was investigated in rat liver microsomes in vitro (10(-5)-10(-3) M) and in vivo after treatment of rats (5-300 mg/kg b.m. orally on three consecutive days). In rat liver slices the release of thiobarbituric acid reactants (TBAR) was measured after 1 hour of incubation with the drugs. Denbufylline, nabumetone and BRL 10,720 exerted a significant inhibition of iron stimulated LPO in vitro. Nabumetone showed the strongest antioxidative activity, which was also seen in liver slices. These antioxidative effects were not found after in vivo treatment of rats. Denbufylline (10(-3) M) additionally inhibited H2O2 formation and the luminol and lucigenin amplified CL in vitro. Unexpectedly, nabumetone increased H2O2 formation both in vitro and in vivo, but in vitro only lucigenin amplified CL. BRL 10,720 increased microsomal H2O2 production in vivo. Moreover, BRL 10,720 enhanced CL in vitro and in vivo significantly, which is interpreted as an increase of the production of superoxide anion radicals and other reactive oxygen species such as H2O2, but lipid peroxidation in liver microsomes was not enhanced. These results suggest that denbufylline, nabumetone and BRL 10,720 in contrast to the in vitro effects did not exert antioxidative activities after treatment of rats. On the contrary, BRL 10,720 was found to support the formation of reactive oxygen species in liver microsomes.

Advances in anti-inflammatory therapy

Anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used in veterinary practice to provide symptomatic relief of acute and chronic inflammatory conditions. Whilst much is already known about the properties of corticosteroid and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, new findings on their biology and pharmacokinetics continue to emerge. These are discussed, together with some possible novel therapeutic applications. Recent evidence, suggesting that morphine-like analgesic drugs may possess anti-inflammatory activity, is additionally presented. Knowledge of the pathways of formation, actions and interactions of the diverse range of mediators responsible for the pathophysiological changes underlying the inflammatory process is also increasing. Compounds are being developed which act selectively to block the formation or actions of these mediators and the potential of such agents as anti-inflammatory drugs is discussed. Although such compounds do not, at present, have veterinary applications, when used either alone, or in combination, some may prove to be potent and effective therapeutic agents.

Pathogenesis of gastroduodenal injury due to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: implications for prevention and therapy

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) initiate gastroduodenal ulceration and promote complications such as bleeding and perforation by interfering with the ability of the proximal gastrointestinal tract to maintain its defensive capabilities. Mucosal defense is composed of three critical components: preepithelial, epithelial, and postepithelial. Preepithelial defense is composed of the mucous gel containing mucin, bicarbonate, and surface-active phospholipids. The epithelial component includes the surface cells, their apical tight junctions, and membrane transporters. Postepithelial defense is maintained by mucosal blood flow, which is essential for both defense and repair. NSAIDs interfere with each component of mucosal defense via direct toxic effects along with cyclooxygenase inhibition and depletion of endogenous prostaglandins. Although NSAID injury is dependent on luminal acid, attempts to prevent NSAID injury by acid suppression using H2-receptor antagonists in humans have had limited success, whereas complete inhibition of acid secretion with proton pump inhibition may have promise. Prostaglandins appear most effective for prevention of NSAID injury, sucralfate appears ineffective, and bismuth compounds have not been studied extensively. Recent evidence suggests that NSAID ulcers heal quickly with proton pump inhibitors compared with H2-receptor antagonists in patients who continue NSAID therapy.