Intranasal fluticasone propionate. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis: diagnosis and management

Allergic rhinitis affects 20% of the population of the UK. It confers a significant health burden upon the individual as it affects the patient's quality of life and is associated with serious comorbidities including asthma, sinusitis and conjunctivitis. Owing to its prevalence, it has a significant economic impact through its effects on education, productivity and use of healthcare resources. This review focuses on the management of allergic rhinitis and potential future treatments, because of the lack of clear national guidelines and because this illness is often misdiagnosed and mismanaged. The article provides a comprehensive overview of allergic rhinitis and illustrates the assessment criteria for various subcategories.

Effect of acupuncture therapy combined with fluticasone propionate in the treatment of persistent allergic rhinitis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated inflammatory response.

Persistent allergic rhinitis (PAR) is a subtype of AR, but the treatment of PAR is still a problem. Acupuncture is used as an alternative therapy for AR in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture therapy combined with fluticasone propionate nasal spray in comparison to fluticasone propionate nasal spray alone in the relief of symptoms for PAR.

Methods

This study is a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. A total of 260 eligible patients will be randomly assigned into the treatment group or the control group. The treatment group will receive the nasal fluticasone propionate combined with acupuncture, and the control group will receive fluticasone propionate nasal spray alone for 6 weeks. The primary outcome is the change in the Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) from baseline to the end of treatment, and the Total Non Nasal Symptom Score (TNNSS), reflective total ocular symptom score (rTOSS), Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), use of antiallergic drugs, and the Rhinitis Control Assessment Test (RCAT) are used as secondary outcomes. The participants will be followed up for another 24 weeks after treatment.

Discussion

This clinical trial will be able to provide high level evidence on the acupuncture therapy combined with fluticasone propionate nasal spray in the treatment of PAR.

Trial registration

ISRCTN Registry, ID: ISRCTN44040506. Registered on 22 July 2020.

The effect of treatment with fexofenadine and fluticasone propionate on the gene expression levels of Th9 transcription factors in patients with allergic rhinitis

T helper-9 (Th9) is a new T cell subset involved in allergic rhinitis (AR) pathogenesis. Fexofenadine and fluticasone propionate are the first effective line of AR treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of fexofenadine and fluticasone propionate on the gene expression levels of Interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4), B cell-activating transcription factor-like (BATF), and SPI1 gene-encoded protein (PU.1), essential transcription factors for Th9 cell differentiation, in AR patients. Twenty-six AR patients (aged 32.8 ± 9.1 years, 13 men and 13 women) were treated with fexofenadine and fluticasone propionate for one month. Expression levels of PU.1, IRF4, and BATF genes were measured using Real-Time PCR. Our results showed that after one month of treatment, the expression level of IRF4 and BATF genes decreased significantly (P < 0.001, P < 0.01, respectively), while PU.1 gene expression was not remarkably different. Overall, our results showed that after one month of treatment with fexofenadine and fluticasone propionate, the expression levels of IRF4 and BATF genes in AR patients decreased, which may be due to this treatment regimen. However, the exact mechanism of action of fexofenadine and fluticasone propionate needs further study.

Intranasal Fluticasone Once Daily Compared with Once-Daily Cetirizine in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis : Results of a Multicentre, Double-Blind Study

The efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone aqueous nasal spray, 200µg once daily for 21 days, was compared with cetirizine, 10mg once daily for 21 days, in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study. 237 evaluable patients aged 12 years and above, with seasonal allergic rhinitis (defined as having a positive skin test and a total symptom score of ≥ 6/15), received either fluticasone aqueous nasal spray (n = 119) or cetirizine (n = 118). Improvement in total symptom score was observed in patients from both treatment groups, with the improvement in the fluticasone treatment group being significantly greater (decrease in total symptom score from 9.23 to 2.13) than in the cetirizine treatment group (decrease in total symptom score from 9.36 to 4.31; p < 0.001). There was also a significantly greater improvement in the number of symptom-free days for all symptoms in favour of fluticasone aqueous nasal spray compared with cetirizine (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the percentage of days when patients did not require terfenadine as rescue therapy was significantly greater in the fluticasone group (87%) than in the cetirizine group (80%; p < 0.05). Five adverse events were reported during intranasal fluticasone treatment and 10 adverse events were reported during cetirizine therapy. There were no treatment-related withdrawals from therapy in the fluticasone group, but 5 treatment-related withdrawals were reported in the cetirizine group.This study demonstrated that fluticasone aqueous nasal spray, 200µg once daily, was significantly more effective than cetirizine, 10mg once daily, and had comparable (if not better) tolerability, in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Allergic rhinitis: pharmacotherapy in pregnancy and old age

INTRODUCTION

Allergic rhinitis (AR) affects 20-30% of women in reproductive age and may worsen during pregnancy. About 10% of the elderly suffer from AR, and it could be under-diagnosed in these patients. Many drugs are currently available, however AR treatment during pregnancy and old age represents a challenging issue.

AREAS COVERED

A review of the literature on the topic has been performed. Expert commentary: In pregnancy, drug avoidance should be carefully balanced with the need for AR optimal control. Topical drugs are suggested as a first approach. The safety and tolerability profile of second-generation antihistamines is well supported. If allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is ongoing and well tolerated, there is no reason for stopping it. AIT initiation in pregnancy is not recommended. For elderly patients, no specific concerns have been highlighted regarding topical treatments, except from nasal decongestionants. Second generation antihistamines are generally well tolerated. Old age should not preclude AIT.

Lost in the mist: acute adrenal crisis following intranasal fluticasone propionate overuse

Introduction. Acute adrenal crisis in relation to nasal steroid overuse has been reported very scantly in English medical literature and remains an underdiagnosed condition. Case presentation. A 55 year-old male presented with altered mental status, retrograde amnesia, fluid refractory hypotension, abdominal pain, fever, and chest pain. Physical examination revealed amnesia, bradypsychia, tachycardia, decreased muscle tone and hyporeflexia. Overuse of nasal steroid was suspected by history. Random early morning cortisol level was < 0.2 mcg/dL. The patient was started on hydrocortisone and within 24 hours he had a full recovery. Conclusion. This one-of-a-kind case describes acute adrenal crisis secondary to withdrawal from inhaled nasal corticosteroids overuse in a patient with particular risk factors. Prevention and early recognition of this disorder can significantly reduce its morbidity and mortality.

Therapeutic management of allergic diseases

Allergic diseases are characterized by the activation of inflammatory cells and by a massive release of mediators. The aim of this chapter was to describe succinctly the modes of action, indications, and side effects of the major antiallergic and antiasthmatic drugs. When considering the ideal pharmacokinetic characteristics of a drug, a poorly metabolized drug may confer a lower variability in plasma concentrations and metabolism-based drug interactions, although poorly metabolized drugs may be prone to transporter-based disposition and interactions. The ideal pharmacological properties of a drug include high binding affinity, high selectivity, and appropriate association and dissociation rates. Finally, from a patient perspective, the frequency and route of administration are important considerations for ease of use.

Can intranasal corticosteroids cause migraine-like headache?

Intranasal corticosteroids (INCs) act predominantly locally and are considered to exert minimal systemic effects. On reviewing the international data collected in the World Health Organization's global pharmacovigilance programme an unexpected cluster was found of 38 case reports of migraine in suspected connection with INCs. These reports came from five countries (May 2007) and concerned six different drugs. In all reports the INC was the sole suspect drug. In nine cases re-exposure to the drug had taken place, leading to the recurrence of the event in eight of these patients. However, INCs are mainly used for rhinitis, and there is a known connection between rhinitis and migraine. Although representing only 0.6% of the total of case reports, international pharmacovigilance data suggest that the use of INCs may cause or trigger migraine or migraine-like headache. Further study is needed to determine if the reported association is true or not and, if so, what the possible mechanism is.

Ocular symptom reduction in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis treated with the intranasal corticosteroid mometasone furoate

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is more appropriately termed allergic rhinoconjunctivitis owing to the equally bothersome nasal and ocular symptoms. Extensive evidence supports the ability of intranasal corticosteroids to reduce nasal symptoms of AR, although less evidence is available to define clearly their impact on allergic conjunctivitis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of the intranasal corticosteroid mometasone furoate nasal spray (NS) on the ocular symptoms of seasonal AR.

METHODS

This retrospective pooled analysis of 4 placebo-controlled clinical studies randomized patients 12 years and older with symptomatic seasonal AR to receive mometasone furoate NS, 200 microg once daily (n = 491), or placebo (n = 492). Ocular symptom (eye tearing [epiphora], itching [pruritus], and redness [erythema]) severity was rated by patients twice daily on a 4-point scale (0 = none to 3 = severe) in the morning and evening, with scores averaged to obtain a daily mean score. Efficacy variables were the pooled mean change from baseline in the averaged morning and evening total ocular symptom score (TOSS) and the individual ocular symptom scores.

RESULTS

The change in mean TOSS from baseline to days 1 to 15 was -1.33 (-19.8%) with mometasone furoate NS and -0.93 (-5.6%) with placebo (P < .001). Improvements in individual symptoms were significantly better with mometasone furoate NS than with placebo on days 2 (tearing) and 4 (itching and redness). A slightly greater reduction in TOSS was seen with mometasone furoate NS treatment in the evening than in the morning.

CONCLUSIONS

This detailed analysis of an intranasal corticosteroid on individual ocular symptoms supports the positive impact of mometasone furoate NS on ocular symptoms.

CT assessment of the effect of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray treatment on lower turbinate hypertrophy due to vasomotor rhinitis

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate (FP) aqueous nasal spray was objectively found to be effective and safe for the treatment of lower turbinate enlargement in patients with vasomotor rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of FP aqueous nasal spray treatment in lower turbinate hypertrophy due to vasomotor rhinitis using CT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 35 patients with hypertrophic lower turbinates due to vasomotor rhinitis, 20 were treated twice daily with FP aqueous nasal spray (200 microg/day) for 3 months continuously and 15 were treated with placebo vehicle as a control group. The local effect of the nasal spray was studied using CT and visual analog scales.

RESULTS

Treatment with FP provided significantly greater relief from the symptom of nasal obstruction compared with placebo over the entire 3-month treatment period (p < 0.001). When the change from baseline was compared between the two groups, FP produced statistically significant reductions in the mucosal area of the lower turbinates and in the thickness of the nasal mucosa after 3 months (p < 0.05).

Corticosteroids: the mainstay in asthma therapy

Inflammation is now marked as a central feature of asthma pathophysiology and aims of current asthma management are not only to treat acute symptoms of wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness, cough but also to suppress the underlying inflammatory component. Despite the availability of a number of drugs, corticosteroids remain the mainstay in the management of all types of asthma as these are the most potent and effective antiinflammatory agents available so far. Corticosteroids suppress virtually every step in inflammation. However therapeutic doses of oral glucocorticoids are associated with a range of adverse reactions. To overcome these side effects, inhalations have been developed to deliver glucocorticoids directly to the lungs and in the process a number of aerosol preparations have become available, which have advantage of significantly lower toxicity due to low systemic absorption from the respiratory tract and rapid inactivation. Despite considerable efforts by pharmaceutical industry, it has been difficult to develop novel therapeutic agents for asthma management, which could surpass inhaled corticosteroids. Currently the data favours using inhaled corticosteroids as monotherapy in the majority of patients in all kinds of asthma. If combination therapy is recommended to achieve additional control in severe asthma cases, other drugs such as beta-agonists, antileukotrienes, theophylline, etc. are considered as adjunct therapies to corticosteroids. This review discusses the importance of corticosteroids as first line therapy for asthma treatment with the availability of inhaled corticosteroids for chronic treatment and oral formulations for treating acute exacerbations of moderate to severe asthma.

Perennial rhinitis in the under 4s: a difficult problem to treat safely and effectively? A comparison of intranasal fluticasone propionate and ketotifen in the treatment of 2-4-year-old children with perennial rhinitis

To compare the safety and efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) and oral ketotifen in children aged 2-4 years with perennial rhinitis. A randomized, multicentre, double-blind, double dummy, placebo-controlled study. Paediatric patients between the ages of 2-4 years with perennial rhinitis. Rhinitis symptoms score (parent-rated), clinical evaluation of symptoms (investigator-rated) and adverse event profiles during the treatment period. Patients treated with FPANS had a significant reduction in both the total night-time rhinitis symptom assessment for weeks 4-6 (p-value 0.036), and the total daytime rhinitis symptom score over the same period (p-value 0.049). Generally, except for nasal itching/rubbing over weeks 1-3, the patients taking FPANS had lower recorded symptom scores for all individual symptoms measured. Nasal blockage, in particular, was significantly reduced over the 4-6 week period (p-value 0.027). The overall investigator-rated clinical evaluation showed substantial improvement or improvement in nine of 12 of the children taking FPANS compared with four of 14 taking ketotifen. Finally, there were no reports of serious adverse events, the incidence of drug-related adverse events was low and there was no statistical difference between the groups. FPANS may be an appropriate treatment to control the symptoms of rhinitis in children between 2 and 4 years old.

Obstructive sleep apnea in children: do intranasal corticosteroids help?

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common condition of childhood, and is associated with significant morbidity. Prevalence of the condition peaks during early childhood, due in part to adenoidal and tonsillar enlargement within a small pharyngeal space. The lymphoid tissues regress after 10 years of age, in the context of ongoing bony growth, and there is an associated fall in the prevalence of OSA. Obstruction of the nasopharynx by adenoidal enlargement promotes pharyngeal airway collapse during sleep, and the presence of large tonsils contributes to airway obstruction. Administration of systemic corticosteroids leads to a reduction in the size of lymphoid tissues due to anti-inflammatory and lympholytic effects. However, a short course of systemic prednisone has been demonstrated not to have a significant effect on adenoidal size or the severity of OSA, and adverse effects preclude the long-term use of this therapy. Intranasal corticosteroids are effective in relieving nasal obstruction in allergic rhinitis, and allergic sensitization is more prevalent among children who snore than among those who do not snore. Intranasal corticosteroids have also been demonstrated to reduce adenoidal size, independent of the individual's atopic status. There is preliminary evidence of an improvement in the severity of OSA in children treated with intranasal corticosteroids, but further studies are needed before such therapy can be routinely recommended. Prescribing clinicians should take into account the potential benefits to the patient, the age of the child, the presence of comorbidities such as allergic rhinitis, the agent used, and the dose and duration of treatment when considering such therapy.

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray in pregnancy rhinitis

Pregnancy rhinitis is a common condition with longstanding nasal congestion; troublesome for the mother, possibly also affecting the fetus. There is need for a safe, effective treatment. Nasal corticosteroids, indisputable in other types of rhinitis, have not been evaluated in pregnancy rhinitis. In this placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study with parallel groups, we evaluated the effect of 8 weeks of treatment with fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray in 53 women with pregnancy rhinitis. Daily symptom scores and nasal peak expiratory flow, as well as acoustic rhinometry before and after treatment, did not show any difference between the groups. Placebo resulted in 6/27 responders, compared with 5/26 for active treatment. There was no detectable influence on maternal cortisol as measured by morning S-cortisol and overnight 12-h-U-cortisol, or any difference in ultrasound measures of fetal growth or pregnancy outcome. Altogether, our study indicates no significant effects of the treatment described here.

A risk-benefit assessment of intranasal triamcinolone acetonide in allergic rhinitis

The efficacy of intranasal triamcinolone acetonide in seasonal and allergic rhinitis has been evaluated in clinical trials and has been compared with antihistamines and other intranasal corticosteroids. Intranasal corticosteroids are either as equally effective as or more effective than comparative drugs. Intranasal corticosteroids are particularly useful as they decrease membrane permeability and inhibit both early and late phase reactions to allergens. They minimise the nasal secretory response and reduce the sensitivity of local nasal irritant receptors. A potential benefit of topical application is the flushing action of the nasal mucosa, which may reduce allergens and secretions. In addition to seasonal and perennial rhinitis, intranasal corticosteroids have additional benefits when used to reduce inflammation in the treatment of sinusitis and may help in decreasing secondary rhinovirus infections. Furthermore, suboptimal control of asthma can be avoided by treatment of allergic rhinitis with intranasal corticosteroids. In clinical trials, common adverse effects for triamcinolone acetonide include sneezing, dry, mucosa, nasal irritation, sinus discomfort, throat discomfort, epistaxis and headache. Posterior subcapsular cataract formation has not been seen with triamcinolone acetonide. Recent literature evaluating systemic absorption of intranasal corticosteroids have shown surprising results where significant absorption has occurred with intranasal budesonide and fluticasone propionate. Growth and hypothalamic pituitary axis (HPA) function studies have been reviewed, with some intranasal corticosteroids showing changes with continual use. A retrospective study in children receiving daily triamcinolone acetonide for 12 months showed no effect on height and bodyweight. Triamcinolone acetonide at standard dosages (110 or 220microg once or twice a day) does not appear to suppress adrenal gland function and is effective in relieving most symptoms of allergic rhinitis. The International Consensus Conference Proceedings on Rhinitis now currently recommends the use of intranasal corticosteroids as first line therapy, since they have been found to be well tolerated and effective with minimal adverse effects and, specifically, no cognitive impairment. The recommended maximum dose of aqueous triamcinolone acetonide in adults and children is 220microg once a day. The aerosol form may be recommended in children between 7 and 12 years old, up to 440microg once a day or in divided doses. Duration of allergy treatment is generally for the length of each allergy season. If symptoms are perennial, then a reduction of dosage is made to the lowest effective dose with monitoring every 3 months for risk and benefit assessment. Complications to watch for include bleeding, and possible septal perforation and nasal candidiasis, although these are rare.

Demonstration of therapeutic equivalence of generic and innovator beclomethasone in seasonal allergic rhinitis. SAR Study Group

BACKGROUND

Although generic formulations of drugs are chemically equivalent, they may not be bioequivalent to the innovator. Since bioequivalence of intranasal corticosteroids has been difficult to demonstrate by pharmacokinetic methods, clinical trials have been necessary to compare generic and innovator agents.

OBJECTIVE

We therefore designed a multicenter, randomized double-blind, parallel-group placebo-controlled study to examine the therapeutic equivalence of generic beclomethasone diproprionate to the innovator.

METHODS

A total of 518 patients, ages 12 to 60, with ragweed-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis from eight centers were randomized to receive intranasal generic or innovator beclomethasone 42 microg, 84 microg or placebo twice daily for 6 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by means of rhinitis symptom scores as recorded in patient diaries. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study to assess safety.

RESULTS

Mean rhinitis composite symptom scores (congestion, postnasal drip, runny nose, and sneezing) were significantly lower in patients receiving 42 microg (P = .0003) or 84 microg (P = .0001) beclomethasone twice daily compared with placebo. Generic beclomethasone was equivalent therapeutically to the innovator in alleviating nasal congestion (42 microg and 84 microg doses), postnasal drip (84 microg dose), runny nose (84 microg dose), sneezing (42 microg and 84 microg doses) and mean composite (42 microg and 84 microg doses) symptom scores during the 6-week study period. Similar and equivalent efficacy was also demonstrated during the 5-day period of peak pollen counts at each site. The type and incidence of drug-related adverse events were similar for both beclomethasone treatment groups and did not differ significantly from placebo in severity and frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

Generic beclomethasone was therapeutically equivalent to the innovator in regards to both efficacy and side effect profile in the treatment of ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis.

Rearrangement of a 16alpha,17alpha-Epoxy-16beta-methylandrostane-17beta-carbothioic Acid to a 17beta-Mercapto-16beta-methylandrostane-17alpha,16alpha-carbolactone

The 16alpha,17alpha-epoxy-16beta-methylandrostane-17beta-carbothioic acid 2b rearranges in solution at ambient temperature to the 17beta-mercapto-16beta-methylandrostane-17alpha,16alpha-carbolactone 6a, possibly via the spirocyclic alpha-thiolactone 5.

Risk-benefit assessment of fluticasone propionate in the treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis

BENEFITS

Fluticasone propionate (FP) is a new topical corticosteroid spray for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma. FP has been shown to be effective for the treatment of adult and pediatric asthma, even at rather low doses (25 microg twice daily [b.i.d.]); many studies in asthma have shown clinical efficacy of fluticasone at half the dose of the comparison steroid (such as beclomethasone dipropionate [BDP] or budesonide [BUD]). However, exact dose comparisons cannot be made because dose-ranging comparison studies have not been done. Studies in allergic rhinitis in children and adults have shown good efficacy in FP-treated patients at a dose of 200 microg once daily (o.d.), intranasally. In summary, FP is effective in both asthma and allergic rhinitis.

RISKS

FP has minimal systemic activity because the portion of drug that is swallowed is not absorbed from the gut. Thus, the amount available for systemic activity is only that which is absorbed through the nasal mucosa (in the treatment of rhinitis) or through the alveoli of the lungs (in the treatment of asthma). When laboratory assays of adrenal function or bone formation are measured, FP and other inhaled corticosteroids can be shown to cause suppression of these markers, especially at high doses. There have been no consistent reports of clinical adrenal suppression or osteoporosis caused by FP. In summary, the risk-benefit ratio of FP at the usual doses (therapeutic ratio) is very favorable. High doses may show evidence of suppression of the hypothalamic pituitary axis as measured by in vitro tests, but evidence of corresponding clinical adverse effects is lacking.

Allergy for the laryngologist

Allergic disease can affect any portion of the respiratory tract, including the larynx, trachea, bronchial tree, nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, nasopharynx, and pharynx. This review evaluates laryngeal manifestations of allergic disease and the impact of allergic mechanisms in disorders, within the scope of laryngology.

Fluticasone propionate attenuates ozone-induced rhinitis and mucous cell metaplasia in rat nasal airway epithelium

Ozone (O3) is the principal oxidant pollutant in photochemical smog. Repeated exposures to O3 induces inflammation and mucous cell metaplasia in the nasal airways of laboratory animals. Our study was designed to determine the efficacy of a topical anti-inflammatory corticosteroid in preventing O3-induced rhinitis and mucous cell metaplasia in rat nasal epithelium. Male F344 rats were exposed to filtered air (0 ppm O3; air-controls) or 0.5 ppm O3, 8 h/day, for 3 or 5 days. Immediately before and after each exposure, rats received an intranasal instillation (50 microl/nasal passage) of a topical corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate (FP; 25 microg/nasal passage) or its vehicle only (0.01% ethanol in saline). Rats were killed 2 h after the third exposure (3-day exposure) or 3 days after the fifth exposure (5-day exposure) and nasal tissues were processed for light microscopy. Numeric densities of epithelial cells and neutrophils, and the amount of intraepithelial mucosubstances (IM) in the epithelium lining the maxilloturbinates were morphometrically determined. There were no significant differences in any measured parameter in air-exposed rats instilled with FP compared with air-exposed rats instilled with vehicle. Vehicle-treated rats exposed to ozone had neutrophilic rhinitis with 3.3- and 1.6-fold more intraepithelial neutrophils (3-day and 5-day exposure, respectively) and marked mucous cell metaplasia (5-day exposure only) with numerous mucous cells and approximately 60 times more IM in the nasal transitional epithelium compared with vehicle-treated air-controls. FP-treated rats exposed to ozone had minimal nasal inflammation (1.3-fold more intraepithelial neutrophils only after 3-day exposure) and minimal mucous cell metaplasia (5-fold more IM only after 5-day exposure) compared with vehicle-instilled, air-exposed rats. Results of this study indicate that FP-treatment is effective in attenuating not only O3-induced rhinitis (30-60% reduction) but also O3-induced mucous cell metaplasia (85% reduction) in rat nasal transitional epithelium. The cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in FP-induced attenuation of O3-induced nasal lesions remain to be determined.

Comparison of once daily mometasone furoate (Nasonex) and fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal sprays for the treatment of perennial rhinitis. 194-079 Study Group

BACKGROUND

Mometasone furoate (Nasonex), in a new once-daily aqueous nasal spray formulation, has been shown to be as effective and well-tolerated as twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray in treating symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis and perennial rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of mometasone furoate to placebo and of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray, all treatments administered once-daily, in patients with perennial rhinitis.

METHODS

This was a 3-month, randomized, double-blind, double dummy, parallel group study in 550 patients, aged 12 to 77 years, at 25 centers in Canada, Latin America, and Europe. Patients allergic to at least one perennial allergen, with confirmed allergy history, skin test positivity, and moderate to severe symptomatology, were eligible to receive one of the following treatments, once daily in the morning: mometasone furoate 200 micrograms, fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms, or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in total AM plus PM diary nasal symptom score over the first 15 days of treatment.

RESULTS

Four hundred fifty-nine patients were valid for efficacy. For the primary efficacy variable, mometasone furoate was significantly (P < .01) more effective than placebo and was not statistically different from fluticasone propionate (percent reductions from baseline were 37, 39, and 22 for mometasone furoate, fluticasone propionate, and placebo, respectively). Generally, similar trends were seen for physician-evaluated total nasal symptoms, and patient-rated and physician-rated overall condition and response to therapy. Overall, mometasone furoate was at least as effective as fluticasone propionate at equivalent doses. There was no evidence of tachyphylaxis. All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Mometasone furoate and fluticasone propionate adequately controlled symptoms of perennial rhinitis and were well tolerated.

A comparison of aqueous suspensions of budesonide nasal spray (128 micrograms and 256 micrograms once daily) and fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 micrograms once daily) in the treatment of adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis

The efficacy of aqueous suspensions of budesonide nasal spray and fluticasone propionate nasal spray, in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, was compared in a large, placebo-controlled, two-center study. A 1-week baseline period was followed by a 4- to 6-week treatment period during which 635 adult patients, aged 18-72 years, were randomized to receive either placebo, budesonide 128 micrograms, or 256 micrograms once daily, or fluticasone propionate, 200 micrograms once daily. Nasal and eye symptoms, overall treatment efficacy and safety assessments were made during the study period. Combined, as well as individual, nasal symptoms were significantly improved in all three active treatment groups compared with placebo therapy. Treatment with 256 micrograms/day of budesonide was found to be significantly more effective in reducing the sneezing score compared with 200 micrograms/day of fluticasone propionate. Analysis of symptom scores on days when the pollen count was greater than 10 grains/m3 revealed 256 micrograms/day of budesonide therapy to be significantly more effective in reducing combined symptom scores as well as the individual scores for sneezing and runny nose, compared with 200 micrograms/day fluticasone propionate. The higher dose of budesonide (256 micrograms/day) was also more effective than the lower dose (128 micrograms/day) in reducing sneezing scores and statistical significance was almost reached for the reduction in combined symptom and runny nose scores. Substantial or total control of symptoms was achieved by 31.4%, 85.3%, 88.4%, and 81.9% of patients receiving placebo, 128 micrograms/day of budesonide, 256 micrograms/day of budesonide, and 200 micrograms/day of fluticasone propionate, respectively. The incidence of adverse events was low in all treatment groups. In conclusion, both budesonide and fluticasone propionate treatments were effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. However, 256 micrograms/day of budesonide tended to be more effective than 200 micrograms/day of fluticasone propionate and 128 micrograms/day of budesonide, especially when patients were exposed to a higher pollen load.

Dose ranging study of mometasone furoate (Nasonex) in seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Topical nasal corticosteroids are rapidly gaining acceptance as first-line therapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis, but there is a desire for effective corticosteroids with an improved safety profile over existing products.

OBJECTIVE

A multicenter, double-blind dose ranging study was conducted to compare the activity and tolerance of four doses of mometasone furoate nasal spray (tradename Nasonex) and placebo in adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

Four hundred eighty patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were enrolled and randomized to receive mometasone furoate nasal spray 50 micrograms (n = 96), 100 micrograms (n = 95), 200 micrograms (n = 98) or 800 micrograms (n = 95), or placebo vehicle (n = 95) once daily for 28 days.

RESULTS

All of the doses of mometasone furoate nasal spray showed activity in reducing the severity of rhinitis. The 200-microgram dose reduced total nasal symptom scores and total symptom scores throughout the study (P < .05 versus placebo vehicle). The 50-microgram dose and the 100-microgram dose showed less consistent activity at early timepoints (days 3 and 7), while the 800 microgram dose did not provide significant additional benefits over the 200-microgram dose. All dose levels were well tolerated

CONCLUSION

The results of this trial indicate that 200 micrograms once daily is the optimum dose of mometasone furoate nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

The effect of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray on eosinophils and cytokines in nasal secretions of patients with ragweed allergic rhinitis

Cytokines active on eosinophils are important in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases. A study was conducted to determine if nasal eosinophilia in allergic rhinitis is associated with an increase in eosinophil-active cytokines in nasal secretions and to compare the effects of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray with astemizole and placebo on the levels of these cytokines. Forty-five patients with moderately severe ragweed allergic rhinitis were randomly assigned to receive 2 weeks of treatment with fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms once daily, astemizole 10 mg once daily, or placebo. Nasal lavage was performed in July (preseason), August (peak season), September (after 2 weeks of treatment), and October (postseason). The number of eosinophils, the amount of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), and the amount of eosinophil survival-enhancing activity were measured. Total mean nasal symptom scores, concentrations of nasal eosinophils and EDN, and eosinophil survival-enhancing cytokine activity in nasal secretions were significantly lower after 2 weeks of treatment with fluticasone propionate compared with astemizole or placebo. Survival-enhancing activity was detected in the nasal secretions of 25 patients. By blocking activity with monoclonal antibodies, specific cytokines were identified (granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor, 3 samples; interleukin-3, 2 samples; interleukin-5, 5 samples). In conclusion, eosinophil-active cytokine concentrations parallel the nasal symptoms of patients with ragweed allergic rhinitis. Unlike astemizole, fluticasone propionate significantly lowers cytokine activity in nasal tissue, which may contribute to the therapeutic efficacy of the drug.

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray in the treatment of nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

Topical glucocorticoids are the medical treatment of choice in a majority of patients suffering from nasal polyposis. Fluticasone propionate is a fluorinated steroid reported to be highly effective when used topically in the nose for seasonal and perennial allergic and nonallergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal fluticasone propionate in the treatment of long-standing polyposis.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with long-standing nasal polyposis were treated over a 26-week period with fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms bid, beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms bid or placebo, administered intranasally in an aqueous spray in a double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group design at a single center. The primary efficacy endpoint was the physicians' assessment of symptoms and polyp score. Peak nasal inspiratory flow was performed twice daily and on every visit to evaluate the effect of the corticosteroids on nasal air flow.

RESULTS

A significant difference in the primary efficacy endpoint between fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray compared with placebo was seen after 14 weeks of treatment. This was further verified by the peak nasal inspiratory flow results. There was some evidence of earlier onset in the fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray group compared with the beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray group after 4 weeks in terms of the primary efficacy endpoint. From the daily record cards patients receiving fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray had a significantly higher percentage of days on which they required no rescue medication (P < .009) and a higher percentage of days with an overall nasal blockage score on waking of < 2 (P < .013) when compared with placebo-treated patients. No other statistically significant results were found between the two active compounds.

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms bid and beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms bid are effective in treating the symptoms of nasal polyps, with some evidence that fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray has a faster onset of action and is tolerated at least as well as beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray at the same dose.

Once daily mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray is as effective as twice daily beclomethasone dipropionate for treating perennial allergic rhinitis patients

BACKGROUND

Perennial allergic rhinitis is chronic and persistent, may lead to a constellation of secondary complaints including sinusitis, mouth-breathing, and some symptoms resembling a permanent cold, and often requires constant medical intervention. Well-tolerated nasal corticosteroids, alone or in combination with antihistamines, have been found to be very effective in treating this condition.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of mometasone furoate aqueous suspension, a new once daily nasal spray, to placebo vehicle and to beclomethasone dipropionate, administered twice daily, in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, parallel group study, in 427 patients age 12 years and older at 24 centers in Canada and Europe. Patients allergic to at least one perennial allergen, confirmed by medical history, skin testing, and adequate symptomatology were eligible to receive one of the following regimens for 3 months: mometasone furoate, 200 micrograms only daily; beclomethasone dipropionate, 200 micrograms twice daily (400 micrograms total dose); or placebo vehicle control. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in total AM plus PM diary nasal symptom score over the first 15 days of treatment.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-seven patients were valid for efficacy. For the primary efficacy variable, mometasone furoate was significantly (P < or = .01) more effective than placebo and was indistinguishable from beclomethasone dipropionate. Similar trends were seen among individual symptoms, physician symptom evaluations, and therapeutic response. There was no evidence of tachyphylaxis. All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Mometasone furoate nasal spray adequately controls symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis, offers the advantage of once daily treatment, and is well tolerated.

Once daily intranasal fluticasone propionate (200 micrograms) reduces nasal symptoms and inflammation but also attenuates the increase in bronchial responsiveness during the pollen season in allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray, a new topical corticosteroid, has been proved to be an effective treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVES

We studied the effect of fluticasone propionate on nasal symptoms, circulating eosinophils, and nasal inflammation in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis after high-load pollen exposure. Moreover, we examined its efficacy in preventing the increase in bronchial responsiveness to methacholine (PD20) during the pollen season.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in patients who had a history of allergic rhinitis in response to pollens of grass and Parietaria species and were living in northern Italy. After a run-in period of 2 weeks, 24 patients were treated with fluticasone propionate (200 micrograms, once daily), and 26 patients received matched placebo for 6 weeks, starting from the beginning of the pollen season. Assessment of efficacy was based on scores of daily nasal symptoms. Nasal lavage was performed at the end of the season, and differential cell count was expressed as percent of total cells. PD20 methacholine was measured at the beginning and end of the season and after the season had ended.

RESULTS

Fluticasone propionate significantly reduced nasal obstruction, itching, and rhinorrhea. Eosinophils in blood (p < 0.01) and nasal lavage (p < 0.001) were also reduced. Moreover, fluticasone significantly attenuated the decrease in mean PD20 methacholine (from 1.95 to 0.89 mg) compared with placebo (from 1.38 to 0.37 mg: p < 0.01). After the season, no difference in PD20 methacholine was found between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that fluticasone propionate is effective in decreasing nasal symptoms and eosinophil inflammation in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis after high-load pollen exposure. Our results also demonstrate that treatment with fluticasone propionate partially prevents the increase in bronchial responsiveness provoked by the inhalation of seasonal pollens in allergic rhinitis.

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray: a well-tolerated and effective treatment for children with perennial rhinitis

A total of 535 children aged 4-11 years with perennial rhinitis were recruited to two double-blind studies performed at 56 centres in eight European countries, Israel, and South Africa. One study compared the efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS), at either 100 micrograms once daily (od) or 100 micrograms twice daily (bd), with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDPANS) 200 micrograms bd for 12 weeks in 120 children aged 6-11 years. The second study compared FPANS 100 micrograms od with FPANS 200 micrograms od and placebo for 4 weeks in 415 children aged 4-11 years. Efficacy was determined by means of patient assessments of nasal symptoms of perennial rhinitis and by investigator assessments of symptoms and nasal condition. The symptoms of nasal blockage, on waking and during the day, sneezing, rhinorrhoea, and nasal itching were assessed by the investigator at clinic visits and by the completion of a patient daily diary card. Safety was assessed by collection of adverse event information, routine haematology and biochemistry testing, and monitoring plasma cortisol levels. FPANS demonstrated good control of symptoms at each dose regimen, which was equivalent or superior to BDPANS and superior to placebo. There was no difference between the dose regimens of FPANS. FPANS was as well tolerated as placebo and BDPANS. It is concluded that FPANS 100 micrograms od is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for perennial rhinitis in children aged 4-11 years.

Effect of intranasal fluticasone proprionate on the immediate and late allergic reaction and nasal hyperreactivity in patients with a house dust mite allergy

BACKGROUND

Patients with perennial allergic rhinitis develop nasal symptoms not only after allergen exposure, but generally also after non-specific stimuli.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of 2 week's treatment with fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) on the nasal clinical response, inflammatory mediators and nasal hyperreactivity.

METHODS

Twenty-four rhinitis patients allergic to house dust mite (HDM), participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. After 2 week's treatment with placebo or 200 micrograms FPANS twice daily, patients were challenged with HDM extract. Symptoms were recorded and nasal lavages were collected for up to 9.5 h after challenge. Nasal hyperreactivity was determined by histamine challenge 24 h later.

RESULTS

Because of a carry-over effect for the immediate symptom score, for this variable only the data from the first treatment period were used. FPANS treatment resulted in a significant decrease of nasal symptoms with 70%, 69% and 63% after 100, 1000 and 10,000 Biological Units (BU)/mL of HDM extract respectively. Active treatment resulted in a 76% decrease of the late-phase symptoms. FPANS treatment significantly reduced albumin influx after HDM 1000 BU/mL with 62% and tended to reduce tryptase release after HDM 1000 BU/mL (P = 0.0629). During the late phase FPANS treatment reduced albumin influx with 67% and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) release with 83%. No effect of FPANS was seen on histamine levels. FPANS significantly decreased histamine-induced symptom score with 34%, secretion with 32% and sneezes with 41%.

CONCLUSION

FPANS significantly inhibits the immediate and late allergic response, and nasal hyperreactivity, probably by suppressing mast cells and eosinophils in the nasal mucosa.

Fluticasone propionate--an update on preclinical and clinical experience

Fluticasone propionate (FP) is a novel androstane glucocorticoid with potent anti-inflammatory activity which has been effectively used, intranasally, as therapy for seasonal and allergic perennial rhinitis. When taken by the inhaled route, FP has shown significant therapeutic efficacy in the management of asthma. Fluticasone propionate is a highly lipophilic molecule with good uptake, binding and retention characteristics in human lung tissue. Fluticasone propionate has high glucocorticoid receptor selectivity and affinity, demonstrating rapid receptor association and slow receptor dissociation. In vitro, FP has been shown to potently inhibit T lymphocyte proliferation, cytokine generation, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha)-induced adhesion molecule expression, interleukin-5-induced eosinophilia, mucosal oedema and toluene 2,4-diisocyanate-induced mast cell proliferation, while promoting secretory leucocyte protease inhibitor production and eosinophil apoptosis. In human studies, FP has demonstrated marked vasoconstrictor potency in normal subjects and inhibited antigen-induced mucosal platelet activating factor/eicosanoid production, T lymphocytes and CD25+ cells in patients with rhinitis. Biopsy data from mild asthmatics demonstrate FP-associated reduction in CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD25 cells, with an accompanying reduction in eosinophil and mast cell markers. Clinical studies have evaluated lung function, bronchial reactivity, exacerbation rates and oral corticosteroid-sparing effect. Results show that FP has at least twice the clinical potency of beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide. This appears to be achieved without an accompanying increase in systemic effects, suggesting a therapeutic index which may be higher than other currently available inhaled corticosteroids.

Pharmacotherapy of Allergic Rhinitis: Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids are potent antiinflammatory preparations that have become a mainstay of pharmacotherapy for allergic rhinitis. Numerous forms are available, and these may be administered systemically or locally. It is incumbent upon the prescribing physician to be aware of the general guidelines for use of corticosteroids, the various preparations available, and the potential side effects associated with their administration.

Do inhaled steroids have similar efficacy? A case of bronchial asthma suggesting different efficacy of inhaled glucocorticosteroids

We report a 35-year-old woman who had had bronchial asthma for 17 years. Her asthma worsened and became unstable on treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), budesonide (BUD), and oral glucocorticosteroids (GC). At the age of 31, she had participated in a clinical trial with fluticasone propionate (FP), and after 2 weeks' treatment her asthma was well controlled. Because of pregnancy, her participation was terminated and treatment continued with available inhaled GC; however, the disease deteriorated and treatment with FP was resumed 2 years ago. Lung function normalized after 3 weeks and she has remained clinically stable since.

The efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) contains fluticasone propionate, which is a new topically active glucocorticoid with approximately twice the potency of belcomethasone dipropionate. In this European multicentre study, 143 children with seasonal allergic rhinitis were recruited: 47 received FPANS 100 micrograms once a day (od), 46 received FPANS 200 micrograms od, and 50 patients received placebo od, for 4 weeks. Treatment efficacy was assessed using diary card nasal symptom scores for sneezing, rhinorrhoea, blockage and itching, and eye watering/irritation. Patients receiving FPANS 100 micrograms or FPANS 200 micrograms demonstrated statistically significant improvements in median nasal symptom scores in all the symptoms recorded, when compared with placebo. There were no statistically significant differences between the FPANS 100 micrograms and FPANS 200 micrograms groups in improvement in nasal symptom scores. There was no effect on eye watering/irritation symptoms which could be attributed to either FPANS 100 micrograms or FPANS 200 micrograms when compared with placebo. Use of rescue antihistamine medication was significantly reduced in the FPANS 100 micrograms group when compared with placebo. The adverse events profile was similar in all three treatment groups, and the events reported were generally mild and related to the patients' rhinitis.

Nitric oxide metabolites in nasal lavage fluid of patients with house dust mite allergy

BACKGROUND

The role of nitric oxide in the early and late phase of the allergic process was investigated in patients with allergic rhinitis against house dust mite and the effect of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray was determined.

METHODS

Production of nitric oxide (measured as nitrite+nitrate) in vivo in nasal mucosa was examined in 24 patients with rhinitis allergic to the house dust mite. In a double blind placebo controlled crossover study fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms aqueous nasal spray was administered twice daily for two weeks. In response to provocation with house dust mite extract (after four basal nasal lavages) nasal lavages were performed every hour for 9.5 hours by washing the nose with saline. In addition, a similar lavage protocol was performed in healthy volunteers with or without challenge with phosphate buffered saline.

RESULTS

Nitric oxide is present in nasal lavage fluid in detectable amounts (range 10-50 microM), the level gradually increasing with time in both patients and controls after a decrease during the four basal lavages. Treatment with fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray did not affect initial basal production of nitric oxide nor production following provocation with house dust mite extract.

CONCLUSIONS

Production of nitric oxide in nasal mucosa determined in sequential nasal washings is not affected by therapeutic doses of intranasal steroids.

The anti-inflammatory profile of fluticasone propionate

Fluticasone propionate is a new corticosteroid based on the androstane nucleus. It is more lipophilic than beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide, and binds more avidly to human lung tissue. It has an absolute affinity (KD) of 0.5 nM for the glucocorticoid receptor and a relative receptor affinity 1.5- and 3.0-times greater than that of beclomethasone-17-monopropionate (17-BMP) and budesonide, respectively. The rate of association with the receptor is faster and the rate of dissociation slower than with standard corticosteroids. As a result, the half-life of the corticosteroid-receptor complex is > 10 h. Fluticasone propionate is also highly selective for the glucocorticoid receptor, with little or no activity at other steroid receptors. Pretreatment with fluticasone propionate significantly inhibits the increase in mast cell numbers in the nasal mucosa of rats chronically exposed to toluene di-isocyanate (TDI), and suppresses TDI-induced mast cell degranulation. It is more potent in vitro than dexamethasone, BDP and budesonide in inhibiting anti-CD3-induced human T-lymphocyte proliferation, in attenuating tumour necrosis factor-alpha-induced endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression, and in increasing secretory leucocyte protease inhibitor levels in airway epithelial cells. It is also more potent and longer-acting than other corticosteroids in inhibiting oedema formation, interleukin-5 (IL-5)-induced blood eosinophilia, and IL-5- or platelet activating factor-stimulated eosinophil accumulation in the lung. Fluticasone propionate therefore has increased intrinsic glucocorticoid potency and high topical anti-inflammatory activity.

A double-blind comparison of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray, terfenadine tablets and placebo in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis to grass pollen

Fluticasone Propionate Aqueous Nasal Spray (FPANS) contains a topically active glucocorticoid fluticasone propionate which has been used successfully for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of FPANS with terfenadine tablets or placebo in controlling the symptoms of allergic rhinitis to grass pollen. Two hundred and fourteen patients were treated for 6 weeks during the grass pollen season with either FPANS 200 micrograms once daily, terfenadine tablets (60 mg) twice daily or placebo. Efficacy was evaluated by the analysis of symptom-free days and median symptom scores. Patients receiving FPANS had significantly more days free of nasal blockage on waking (P = 0.012) and during the day (P = 0.01) and of rhinorrhoea (P = 0.027) than those receiving terfenadine. Additionally, in terms of absolute efficacy, patients receiving FPANS demonstrated significantly more days free of the above symptoms (P = 0.017, P = 0.028, P = 0.004, respectively) and of sneezing (P < 0.001) than those receiving placebo. There were no significant differences in symptoms of nasal itching, eye symptoms, of symptoms of drowsiness between the three treatment groups. Patients in the FPANS group had significantly lower median symptom scores for nasal blockage on waking (P < 0.001) and during the day (P < 0.018) than those in the terfenadine group and significantly lower scores for nasal blockage on waking (P < 0.001), sneezing (P < 0.013) and rhinorrhoea (P = 0.005) than those in the placebo group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A comparison of fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms/day with beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/day in adult asthma

A total of 261 patients with symptomatic, mild to moderate asthma were randomized to treatment in this 4-week, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms/d with beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/d. Improvements from both treatments were seen in diary card data. Morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) improved from 375 to 390 and 371 to 382 l/min with fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate, respectively. Symptom scores, percentage of symptom-free days and nights, and use of rescue beta 2-agonist medication also improved, as did clinical lung function. With the exception of percentage of rescue-free days, which was greater for beclomethasone dipropionate, none of the differences between the groups were statistically significant. There was a significant difference between treatments in the number of rescue-free days over days 1-28; however, there was no difference between treatments in the number of rescue-free days over days 1-14, nor was there any difference in the number of inhalations of rescue medication used throughout the study. Very few adverse effects were reported. Although all mean plasma cortisol values were within the normal range, they were significantly different between treatments, rising from 402 to 429 nmol/l with fluticasone propionate, and falling from 435 to 394 nmol/l with beclomethasone dipropionate (P = 0.006). Mean stimulated cortisol levels 30 min after tetracosactin injection were also significantly greater with fluticasone propionate (P = 0.024). In conclusion, fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms/d is as effective as beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/d with less effect on plasma cortisol levels.

Inhaled fluticasone propionate. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in asthma

Fluticasone propionate is an androstane carbothioate glucocorticosteroid with almost twice the topical anti-inflammatory potency of beclomethasone dipropionate. Importantly, it is not appreciably absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. However, the fraction of active drug absorbed from the lungs after inhalation, and therefore total systemic availability, has yet to be determined. Inhaled fluticasone propionate administered at dosages of 1500 micrograms/day for 1 year or 2000 micrograms/day for 6 weeks did not cause clinically significant pituitary-adrenal suppression. Preliminary data from 2 published trials also indicate no significant effect on growth in children. However, wider clinical experience is needed to clarify the effects of long term administration on pituitary-adrenal function, bone metabolism and attainment of adult height in children. In clinical studies, inhaled fluticasone propionate was at least as effective as beclomethasone dipropionate or budesonide when administered at half the dosage of the comparators in patients with mild to moderate or severe asthma. Limited data suggest that fluticasone propionate also has considerable potential in the management of childhood asthma. In trials of up to 1 year in duration, fluticasone propionate appeared to be well tolerated by both adults and children. Whether an improved tolerability profile compared with other corticosteroids is a major clinical benefit of the extremely low oral bioavailability of inhaled fluticasone propionate requires confirmation. Nevertheless, on the basis of available data from initial clinical trials of mostly limited duration, inhaled fluticasone propionate offers an effective treatment option for the management of asthma, with the potential of an enhanced safety profile.

Clinical pharmacology of corticosteroids in bronchial asthma

It is now recognised that suppression of the inflammatory cascade should be the cornerstone of management in bronchial asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are the most effective and widely used form of anti-inflammatory therapy for use in patients with asthma. The limited data available on dose-response relationships for inhaled corticosteroids suggest that a plateau occurs for antiasthmatic efficacy above 1600 micrograms either for budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate with no appreciable differences between the two drugs. However, in most cases it should be possible to achieve adequate asthma control with doses of either drug less than 1000 micrograms with a use of an optimal inhaler device and good compliance. In contrast to topical anti-inflammatory activity in airways, for both local and systemic adverse effects there is a steep dose-response above 1600 micrograms with budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate. In comparison with oral prednisolone there is still a better risk-benefit ratio even with higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids. There is evidence to suggest that inhaled budesonide may have a slightly more favourable profile in terms of the ratio of topical to systemic activity, particularly for effects on bone metabolism. A significant degree of adrenal suppression is unlikely at doses less than 1600 micrograms of budesonide or beclomethasone, although there is a degree of interindividual variability in the dose-response relationship for this effect, as well as for antiasthmatic activity. Thus, doses of inhaled corticosteroid should be titrated on an individual basis in order to achieve adequate disease control. At doses in excess of 800 micrograms it would seem rational to use a large volume spacer device since this will lessen local adverse effects such as oral candidiasis and dysphonia, as well as reducing systemic absorption and improving lung deposition. Mouth washing may reduce local and systemic adverse effects when using dry powder devices at high doses. Another possible strategy to improve efficacy with higher doses is to increase the dosing frequency from twice to four times daily, although this may at the same time produce an increase in local adverse effects. Fluticasone propionate is a novel inhaled corticosteroid with very high topical anti-inflammatory activity and minimal systemic bioavailability and might, therefore, provide a favourable therapeutic profile at the high end of the dose range. The next decade of research into the clinical pharmacology of inhaled corticosteroids is, therefore, eagerly awaited and will hopefully consolidate improvements in asthma management with this important class of anti-inflammatory drugs.