Metoprolol: a pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life evaluation of its use in hypertension, post-myocardial infarction and dilated cardiomyopathy

Dose-independent influence of metoprolol on cardiac and motor functions, QoL, and mental status in Chinese patients with CHF

Objective

The objective of the study was to evaluate the dose-related influence of metoprolol on cardiac performance, motor function, quality of life (QoL), and mental status in Chinese patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).

Patients and methods

This was a prospectively designed single-center study which enrolled CHF patients with resting heart rate (HR) >80 bpm belonging to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) III/IV functional classification. Patients were initiated with 12.5 mg of metoprolol, and every second week, the dose was escalated until the target HR level (60–70 bpm) was achieved during the follow-up at 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the doses administered: 47.5 mg (n=37) and 118.75 mg (n=74), respectively, for comparison in terms of change in cardiac function, motor function, QoL, and mental status.

Results

Among the 111 patients with CHF, no significant difference was shown between the two doses administered. Irrespective of the dose, the cardiac performance, motor function, QoL, and anxiety improved and there was an increase in depression, whereas the effect on burnout, calculated as Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), equally was insignificant throughout the 1-year follow-up period in both the CHF patient groups.

Conclusion

Lower dose of metoprolol (47.5 mg) is as effective as higher dose (118.75 mg) in Chinese population with CHF to improve the cardiac function, motor function, QoL, and mental status.

Metoprolol-induced Severe Liver Injury and Successful Management with Therapeutic Plasma Exchange

Liver injury caused by metoprolol is very rare with current reports limited to an isolated elevation in transaminases. We report the first case of severe icteric liver injury leading to hepatic encephalopathy secondary to metoprolol use in a patient diagnosed with coronary heart disease. We also describe the histopathology of metoprolol-related liver injury, discuss mechanisms of injury with new insights on the immunological phenomenon, and shed light on the successful utility of early plasmapheresis as a salvage therapy in metoprolol-induced severe liver damage.

A prospective study on the impact of heart rate control achieved with metoprolol on cardiac performance, motor function and quality of life in Chinese chronic heart failure patients

BACKGROUND

To prospectively evaluate the impact of metoprolol achieved heart rate (HR) on cardiac-motor function and quality of life (QoL) in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between February 2013 to April 2016, association of HR reduction with haemodynamic indices, motor function and QoL in CHF patients with HR>80bpm receiving metoprolol 23.75mg or 47.5mgq.d was studied. Overall, 154 patients (median age, 66.39years; males, n=101; females, n=53) were enrolled, whose average resting HR decreased significantly from baseline value of 82.72±6.73 to 69.38±3.57, 67.72±2.61, 66.50±3.14 and 64.86±3.21bpm in the 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months post metoprolol intervention, respectively (P<0.0001). Similarly, the ejection fraction (r=-0.6461, P<0.0001), cardiac output (r=-0.5238, P<0.0001), cardiac index (r=-0.5378, P<0.0001) and veterans specific activity questionnaire scores (r=-0.4088, P<0.0001) were significantly associated with the reduction in HR after 12months. The improvement in 6-min walk test was independent of HR reduction (P=0.005). Similarly, QoL as measured by short form-8 questionnaire (SF-8) but not Minnesota Living with Heart Failure was significantly improved at the 12th-month. However, this was not associated with the reductions in HR.

CONCLUSION

Metoprolol achieved HR control was associated with improvement in cardiac performance and motor function but not QoL in patients with CHF.

Quality of Life Measured in a Practice-Based Hypertension Trial of an Angiotensin Receptor Blocker

Effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment depends not only on drugs that avoid or minimize symptomatic side effects but also on therapy that has a positive effect on quality of life. This study assessed the effect on quality of life of a contemporary agent (an angiotensin receptor blocker) and evaluated the validity and practicality of using a quality-of-life instrument in the practice-based setting. A total of 2716 hypertensive patients, either untreated or on single-agent therapy, were started on or switched to 40 mg telmisartan for 6 weeks; in patients whose blood pressures remained above 130/85 mm Hg after 2 weeks, the dose was increased to 80 mg for the remaining 4 weeks of treatment. Quality of life was measured by patient self-administration of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (GWBI) at baseline and at the end of the study. Sixty-eight percent (n=1858) of patients treated with telmisartan fully completed both GWBI tests; the test score increased by 5.2+/-0.3 (p<0.0001) from 77.7+/-0.4. This improvement was observed across all six emotional and health subscales of the GWBI. White and black patients, those aged <65 or >/=65 years, and men and women had similar increases, though the baseline value in women was sharply lower (p<0.001) than in men. The GWBI rose more in patients whose blood pressure was controlled by treatment (<140/90 mm Hg) than in noncontrolled patients (6.1 vs. 4.1, p<0.0001); for all patients the decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures produced by telmisartan correlated significantly (p<0.001 for each) with the increases in the GWBI scores. Controlling blood pressure appears to be an important element in improving subjective health perceptions of hypertensive patients.

Cost-effectiveness of the treatment of heart failure with ramipril: a Spanish analysis of the AIRE study

AIMS

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of adding ramipril to conventional treatment in patients with heart failure after myocardial infarction from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective analysis of the AIRE study was made, using previously published data from the clinical trial combined with local Spanish resource and cost data. A typical rehospitalisation for a heart failure episode would last an average of 11.6 days with an average cost of 350.80 per day. The incremental cost of ramipril per life-year gained in the baseline case was 1550.10 after 3.8 years of follow-up. Sensitivity analysis showed that the basic conclusions were robust in spite of extreme variations in the values of the key parameters of the model.

CONCLUSION

The use of ramipril in addition to conventional treatment in heart failure patients after myocardial infarction is cost-effective both according to currently accepted international standards of what constitutes a cost-effective intervention and also indirectly by comparing the results with similar pharmaceutical products financed under the Spanish National Health System.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ramipril in heart failure after myocardial infarction. Economic evaluation of the Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) study for Germany from the perspective of Statutory Health Insurance

OBJECTIVE

Data from the Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) study were used in a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine the incremental cost per life-year gained (LYG) when the ACE inhibitor ramipril was added to conventional treatment in patients with heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. In the AIRE trial, the addition of ramipril significantly lowered rates of total mortality and rehospitalisation due to heart failure.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) provider in Germany. A modelling approach was used which was based on secondary analysis of existing data, and costs were those incurred by SHI (i.e. expenses of SHI). In the base-case analysis, average case-related expenses of SHI were applied and LYG were quantified by the method of Kaplan and Meier.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of ramipril varied between 2500 and 8300 deutschmarks (DM) per LYG (1993 values for inpatient and 1995 values for outpatient treatment; DM1 approximately $US0.70), according to the treatment periods of 3.8 years and 1 year, respectively. In the sensitivity analysis, the robustness of the model and its results was shown when the extent of influence of different model variables on the base-case results was investigated. First, survival probability and LYG were estimated according to the Weibull method. Second, the dependency of the target variable (i.e. incremental cost per LYG) on random variables was described in a simulation. Third, the influence of the model variables on the target variable was quantified using a deterministic model. The variance of the target variable was broad and the hospitalisation impact of adding ramipril to conventional treatment was an independent variable with much greater influence on the target variable than the parameter of clinical effectiveness, i.e. the number of LYG.

CONCLUSION

Results of this evaluation showed that ramipril has a favourable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the treatment of heart failure in post myocardial infarction patients and can be considered an economical therapeutic agent from the perspective of SHI (third-party payer) in Germany.

[Cost effectiveness of bisoprolol in heart failure. Economic evaluation of the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS) for Germany]

BACKGROUND

The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS) demonstrates that, for patients with heart failure of different etiologies, the administration of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor blocker bisoprolol adjuvant to the standard therapy leads to a significant avoidance of hospital admissions.

PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION

The results of the CIBIS were evaluated pharmacoeconomically for the Federal Republic of Germany, and were restricted to direct costs only. The costs of bisoprolol medication and in-patient treatment of heart failure were considered, the latter forming the major part of costs incurred.

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive therapy with bisoprolol is not only clinically beneficial to the patient with heart failure, but also economically advantageous.