Strategies for smoking cessation: what is new and what works?

While the prevalence of smoking in the USA has declined over the past half century, there still remain over 40 million current smokers, ensuring that smoking will continue to be a major factor influencing premature morbidity and mortality rates for years to come. Most people begin smoking during their teenage years and struggle to quit as adults. Nicotine dependence should be considered a chronic health condition with exacerbations and remissions. Clinicians have an important role to play in helping their patients to stop smoking. The systematic identification of all smokers is the initial step in addressing smoking cessation. Providing both pharmacotherapy and counseling support for all quit attempts helps to optimize rates of cessation. First-line pharmacotherapy to support a quit attempt include nicotine replacement (gum, patch, lozenge, nasal spray or inhaler), bupropion or varenicline. Use of these agents can increase quit rates by 1.5- to threefold. Several studies have shown that combining the nicotine patch with either gum or nasal spray can increase quit rates over single modality therapy. Recent studies have also suggested that giving smokers stop-smoking medications for several weeks in advance of their quit date may help to boost long-term quit rates. New medications are under development, including a nicotine vaccine and faster delivery nicotine medications. However, from a public health perspective, a ban on the sale of nicotine-containing combustion tobacco products may represent the most straightforward means to minimize the harm caused by tobacco use.

Does the number of free nicotine patches given to smokers calling a quitline influence quit rates: results from a quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

The offer of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) can be a cost-effective marketing strategy to induce smokers to call a telephone quitline for quitting assistance. However, the most cost-effective supply of free NRT to provide to smokers who call a quitline remains unknown. This study tests the hypothesis that smokers who call a telephone quitline and are given more free nicotine patches would report higher quit rates upon follow-up 12 months later.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental design was used to assess nicotine patch usage patterns and quit rates among five groups of smokers who called the New York State Smokers' Quitline (NYSSQL) between April 2003 and May 2006 and were mailed 2-, 4-, 6- or 8-week supplies of free nicotine patches. The study population included 2,442 adult (aged 18 years or older) current daily smokers of 10 or more cigarettes per day, who were willing to make a quit attempt, and reported no contraindications for using the nicotine patch. Outcome variables assessed included the percentage of smokers who reported that they had not smoked for at least 7-days at the time of a 12 months telephone follow-up survey, sustained quitting, delayed quitting and nicotine patch use.

RESULTS

Quit rates measured at 12 months were higher for smokers in the groups who received either 2, 6, or 8 weeks of free patches. The lowest quit rate was observed among the group of Medicaid/uninsured smokers who were eligible to receive up to six weeks of free patches. The quit rate for the 4-week supply group did not differ significantly from the 6-week or 8-week groups. These patterns remained similar in an intent-to-treat analysis of 12-month quit rates and in an analysis of sustained quitting.

CONCLUSION

No clear cut dose response relationship was observed between the number of free nicotine patches sent to smokers and smoking outcomes. Baseline differences in the characteristics of the groups compared could account for the null findings, and a more definitive randomized trial is warranted.

Current and emerging treatment approaches for tobacco dependence

Nicotine in tobacco is the primary reason why most people find it hard to stop using tobacco. Nicotine creates dependence by activating the dopaminergic reward system in the brain. Physiologic withdrawal symptoms that occur when nicotine is no longer administered reinforce continued nicotine administration to avoid withdrawal. Extrapolating from this evidence has led to the development of tobacco dependence pharmacotherapy based upon the concept of replacing and/or blocking the effects of nicotine in the brain. The efficacy of nicotine replacement and blockade treatments in lessening symptoms of nicotine withdrawal and increasing quit rates has been consistently demonstrated in clinical trials. Despite the availability of efficacious medications to treat nicotine dependence, current therapies remain underutilized across the population. Health-care providers need to systematically encourage all tobacco users to quit and ensure that their tobacco-using patients use evidence-based treatments when they attempt to quit.

Preferences among four combination nicotine treatments

RATIONALE

Acute nicotine replacement treatments (NRTs) are disliked or misused, leading to insufficient nicotine intake and poor outcome. Patches provide steady nicotine but are slow and passive. Combining systems may improve efficacy with acute NRTs tailored for compliance.

OBJECTIVE

To test initial reactions to and use preferences among combinations of NRTs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Smokers (n=27) tested four combination NRTs in a 5-day crossover trial: 2/4-mg gum + 15-mg patch (G/P), 2/4-mg lozenges + 15-mg patch (L/P), inhaler + 15-mg patch (I/P), and 10 mg + 15-mg patches (P/P). Subjects rated an NRT combination each day after 5-6 h of use and ranked among the NRTs after testing all treatments.

RESULTS

Double-patches (P/P) were ranked highest for "ease of use", "safety", and "use in public". However, for "help to quit", 70% preferred some form of acute-patch combination (A/P) compared to 30% choosing P/P. For "use under stress" (an immediate need), 93% preferred A/P systems compared to 7% choosing P/P. L/P ranked lowest for "ease of use", I/P and L/P were lowest on "safety", and I/P ranked lowest for "use in public". Expectations of NRTs changed with test experience for patches (better) and lozenges (worse).

CONCLUSIONS

In brief testing, all combinations were acceptable. P/P was favored for ease, safety, and public use, but a majority chose A/P systems for help in quitting and use under stress. Combined use is viable and needs to be made known and accessible to smokers.

Comparison of three nicotine treatments: initial reactions and preferences with guided use

RATIONALE

Misuse or dislike of nicotine replacement treatments (NRTs) undermines their effectiveness. Brief testing among NRTs could allow tailoring by preference to improve outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To test initial reactions/preferences to NRTs in a single session crossover design with guided use.

METHODS

Smokers were offered two doses of three NRTs: gum (2 and 4 mg), inhaler, and nasal spray (NNS) in a 5-h test with proper use enforced. Subjects rated each NRT and ranked among NRTs on use variables and preferences.

RESULTS

Gum was ranked over inhaler and NNS for "ease of use," "safety" and "prefer in public." Four-milligram gum was rated higher than 2 mg on several variables. With experience, "ease of use" and "liking" improved for gum. Both inhaler and NNS ranked low on considering "use >3 months" vs gum. Dislike of NRT was reflected in refusal of second doses. For those testing all doses (n=9), inhaler ranked last on "relief of withdrawal," "choose under stress," and "choice to help quit." Craving and withdrawal were relieved over time with any NRT use.

CONCLUSIONS

Sampling of treatments can identify reactions key to initial compliance with these NRTs.

Impact of nicotine replacement therapy on smoking behavior

This review summarizes evidence pertaining to the role of nicotine medications in smoking cessation and focuses particularly on evaluating evidence of the impact that nicotine replacement therapies (NRT) have had on altering population trends in smoking behavior. Accumulated evidence from controlled clinical trials has demonstrated that available forms of NRT (e.g., gum, transdermal patch, nasal spray, inhaler, and lozenge) increase quit rates compared with placebos by 50%-100%. However, despite the positive results from these studies, fewer than one in five smokers making a quit attempt do so with the benefit of NRT. Because not enough smokers are using NRT, the availability of NRT has not had a measurable impact on influencing population trends in smoking behavior. Among the factors contributing to the low utilization of nicotine medications are the inadequacies of the current dosage strengths and formulations of existing medications, smokers' perceptions of the high cost of the drugs, and concerns that many smokers have about safety and efficacy of nicotine medications.

Pharmacotherapy of tobacco dependence

Smoking cessation activities and support for its implementation should be integrated into the health care system. The outcome of smoking cessation has improved with the availability of proper behavior approaches and medications. Incorporating these guidelines into daily clinical practice ensures that health care providers provide the opportunity for patients to quit smoking. The best hope of improved treatment comes from combining existing and new pharmacotherapies with effective behavioral therapy.