Comparative analysis of potential drug-drug interactions in a public and private hospital among chronic kidney disease patients in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: A retrospective cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant public health challenge due to its rising incidence, mortality, and morbidity. Patients with kidney diseases often suffer from various comorbid conditions, making them susceptible to potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) due to polypharmacy and multiple prescribers. Inappropriate prescriptions for CKD patients and their consequences in the form of pDDIs are a major challenge in Pakistan.

AIM

This study aimed to compare the incidence and associated risk factors of pDDIs among a public and private sector hospital in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

METHOD

A retrospective cross-sectional study design was conducted to compare pDDIs among public and private sector hospitals from January 2023 to February 2023. Patients profile data for the full year starting from January 1 2022 to December 302022, was accessed All adult patients aged 18 years and above, of both genders, who currently have or have previously been diagnosed with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were included. For assessing pDDIs, patient data was retrieved and checked using Lexicomp UpToDate® for severity and documentation of potential drug-drug interactions.

RESULTS

A total of 358 patients' data was retrieved (with n = 179 in each hospital); however, due to incomplete data, n = 4 patients were excluded from the final analysis. The prevalence of pDDIs was found to be significantly higher in private hospitals (84.7%) than in public hospitals (26.6%), with a p-value <0.001. Patients in the age category of 41-60 years (AOR = 6.2; p = 0.008) and those prescribed a higher number of drugs (AOR = 1.2; p = 0.027) were independently associated with pDDIs in private hospitals, while the higher number of prescribed drugs (AOR = 2.9; p = <0.001) was an independent risk factor for pDDIs in public hospitals. The majority of pDDIs (79.0%) were of moderate severity, and a significant number of patients (15.1%) also experienced major pDDIs, with a p-value <0.001. The majority of pDDIs had fair documentation for reliability rating in both public and private hospitals.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of pDDIs was higher among CKD patients at private hospitals, and most of the pDDIs were of moderate severity. A considerable number of patients also experienced major pDDIs. The risk of experiencing pDDIs was found to be higher in older patients and among those prescribed a higher number of drugs.

Drug safety in hospitalized patients with tuberculosis: Drug interactions and adverse drug effects

BACKGROUND

Hospitalized patients with tuberculosis (TB) are prescribed with drugs having high risk of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) and adverse drug effects (ADEs).

OBJECTIVES

To explore the adverse effects of anti-tuberculosis (anti-TB) drugs and the prevalence and predictors of pDDIs in hospitalized patients with TB.

METHODS

Clinical profiles of 436 TB patients were reviewed for adverse effects induced by anti-TB drugs and screened for pDDIs using Micromedex-DrugReax. Prevalence and severity levels of pDDIs were reported. Odds ratios for predictors were calculated using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of total 436 patients, adverse effects of anti-TB drugs were found in 36%. ADEs were highly prevalent in patients with high doses of anti-TB drugs. Hepatotoxicity, neuropathy, insomnia, arthralgia, psychosis, hematological alterations, skin rashes, red color stool, diplopia, and photophobia were the identified ADEs. All drugs types- and anti-TB drugs-pDDIs were reported in 78.2% and 55.7%, respectively. Major-pDDIs of anti-TB drugs were identified in 55.5%. Total 1090 anti-TB drugs pDDIs were found, among them, 55.6% were of major- and 40.5% were of moderate-severity. Significant association was observed for the pDDIs with ≥7 prescribed medicines (P < 0.001). Potential adverse outcomes of the most frequent interactions were hepatotoxicity, decreased drug's effectiveness, QT-interval prolongation, nephrotoxicity, and gastrointestinal ulceration.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with TB present with a considerable number of clinically important pDDIs and ADEs (particularly hepatotoxicity). TB patients should be monitored for adverse effects of anti-TB drugs. Attention should be given to major-pDDIs. Patients more at risk to interactions should be identified and monitored for related adverse outcomes.

Potential drug-drug interactions associated with adverse clinical outcomes and abnormal laboratory findings in patients with malaria

BACKGROUND

Hospitalized patients with malaria often present with comorbidities or associated complications for which a variety of drugs are prescribed. Multiple drug therapy often leads to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Therefore, the current study investigated the prevalence, levels, risk factors, clinical relevance, and monitoring parameters/management guidelines of potential DDIs (pDDIs) among inpatients with malaria.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out at two tertiary care hospitals. A total of 398 patients' profiles were evaluated for pDDIs using the Micromedex Drug-Reax^®. Odds ratios were calculated to identify the strength of association between presence of DDIs and potential risk factors via logistic regression analysis. Further, the clinical relevance of frequent pDDIs was investigated.

RESULTS

Of 398 patients, pDDIs were observed in 37.2% patients, while major-pDDIs in 19.3% patients. A total of 325 interactions were found, of which 45.5% were of major- and 34.5% moderate-severity. Patients with the most common pDDIs were found with signs/symptoms and abnormalities in laboratory findings representing nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, QT interval prolongation, and reduced therapeutic efficacy. The following drug pairs reported the highest frequency of adverse events associated with the interactions; calcium containing products-ceftriaxone, isoniazid-rifampin, pyrazinamide-rifampin, isoniazid-acetaminophen, and ciprofloxacin-metronidazole. The adverse events were more common in patients prescribed with the higher doses of interacting drugs. Multivariate regression analysis showed statistically significant association of pDDIs with 5-6 prescribed medicines (p = 0.01), > 6 prescribed medicines (p < 0.001), > 5 days of hospital stay (p = 0.03), and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

PDDIs are commonly observed in patients with malaria. Healthcare professional's knowledge about the most common pDDIs could help in preventing pDDIs and their associated negative effects. Pertinent clinical parameters, such as laboratory findings and signs/symptoms need to be checked, particularly in patients with polypharmacy, longer hospital stay, and diabetes mellitus.

Potential drug-drug interactions associated with clinical and laboratory findings at hospital admission

Background Drug-drug interactions represent one of the causes of adverse therapy outcomes through deteriorated efficacy or safety. However, the true extent of harm related to drug-drug interactions is not well established due to a lack of recognition and understanding. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the association of potential drug-drug interactions with patients variables recorded at admission. Setting A cross-sectional correlation study was performed on the Cardiology ward of the University Clinical Hospital Center in Belgrade, Serbia. Method Data were retrospectively obtained from medical records and LexiInteract was used as the screening tool for potential drug-drug interactions. Main outcome measure Clinical and laboratory parameters recorded at the patients admission. Results A total of 351 patient records entered the analysis, with the mean age of 70 ± 10 years. The prevalence of potentially relevant drug-drug interactions was 61% (N = 213). After controlling for patient characteristics, nine potential drug-drug interactions were significantly associated with laboratory values outside the range and five potential drug-drug interactions with inadequate clinical parameter values. Potential drug-drug interactions were associated with abnormalities in blood count, metabolic parameters, electrolyte imbalance and renal function parameters. Association with inadequate control of systolic, diastolic blood pressure, as well as heart rhythm was also shown. Conclusion Drug-drug interactions were associated with patients clinical and laboratory findings. Our findings may assist in the identification of patients with increased likelihood of suboptimal therapy outcomes. Generating evidence through post-marketing drug-drug interactions research would lead to improvement in clinical decision-support systems, increased effectiveness and utilization in everyday clinical practice.

Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Patients With Urinary Tract Infections: A Contributing Factor in Patient and Medication Safety

Introduction: Hospitalized patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs) often present with comorbid illnesses and are subsequently prescribed multiple medications, which increases the likelihood of drug-drug interactions. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the prevalence, levels, risk factors, and clinical relevance of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) in hospitalized patients with UTIs. Secondly, we aimed to develop management guidelines and identify monitoring parameters for the most frequent interactions.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in internal medicine wards of two tertiary care hospitals in Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The clinical profiles of 422 patients with UTIs were reviewed for pDDIs using the Micromedex Drug-Reax^®. Logistic regression was applied to assess the association of pDDIs with various risk factors. The clinical relevance of frequent pDDIs was identified by assessing the potential adverse outcomes of pDDIs including patients’ signs, symptoms, and abnormal laboratory findings.

Results: Of 422 patients, at least one pDDI was identified in 62.3% patients, while 40% patients had at least one major pDDI. A total of 1,086 pDDIs were identified, of which 53.4% and 39.3% were of moderate and major severity, respectively. Patients with most frequent pDDIs were presented with hypoglycemia, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, hypertension, and decreased therapeutic response. These adverse events were more prevalent in patients taking higher doses of interacting drugs. Multivariate regression analysis revealed significant association of pDDIs with six or more medicines (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), ischemic heart disease (p = 0.02), and congestive cardiac failure (p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Patients with UTIs present with a considerable number of clinically important pDDIs. Polypharmacy, diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, and congestive cardiac failure increase the risk of pDDIs. Knowledge about the most frequent pDDIs will enable healthcare professionals to implement optimized monitoring and management strategies regarding associated adverse consequences in order to ensure patient safety. Most of the interactions can be managed by considering alternative therapy and dose reduction.

Potential drug-drug interactions among pneumonia patients: do these matter in clinical perspectives?

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia patients are usually hospitalized due to severe nature of the disease or for the management of comorbid illnesses or associated symptoms. Such patients are prescribed with multiple medications which increase the likelihood of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs). Therefore, in this study the prevalence, levels (severity and documentation), predictors (risk factors), and clinical relevance of pDDIs among inpatients diagnosed with pneumonia have been investigated.

METHODS

Clinical records of 431 hospitalized patients with pneumonia were checked for pDDIs using drug interactions screening software (Micromedex-DrugReax). Odds-ratios for predictors were calculated using logistic regression analysis. Clinical relevance of pDDIs was assessed by evaluation of patients' clinical profiles for potential adverse outcomes of the most frequent pDDIs. Abnormal patients' signs/symptoms and laboratory investigations indicating adverse outcomes of interactions were reported.

RESULTS

Of total 431 profiles, pDDIs were reported in 73.1%. Almost half of the profiles were having major-pDDIs (53.8%). Total number of pDDIs were 1318, of which 606 were moderate- and 572 were major-pDDIs. Patient's profiles identified with the most frequent interactions were presented with signs, symptoms, and abnormalities in labs indicating decrease therapeutic response, electrolyte abnormalities, hypoglycemia, bleeding, hepatotoxicity, and hypertension. These adverse events were more prevalent in patients taking higher doses of the interacting drugs as compared to lower doses. Logistic regression analysis revealed significant association for major-pDDIs with 6-10 prescribed medicines (OR = 26.1; p = 0.002), > 10 prescribed medicines (OR = 144; p <  0.001), and tuberculosis (OR = 8.2; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

PDDIs are highly prevalent in patients with pneumonia. Most frequent and clinically important pDDIs need particular attention. Polypharmacy and tuberculosis increase the risk of pDDIs. Identifying patients more at risk to pDDIs and careful monitoring of pertinent signs/symptoms and laboratory investigations are important measures to reduce pDDIs and their related adverse consequences.

Drug-Drug Interactions in Hepatitis Patients: Do these Interactions Matter in Clinical Perspectives?

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Hepatitis patients usually present with comorbidities and polypharmacy which increases risk of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs). We explored frequency, levels, predictors, and clinical relevance of pDDIs in hospitalized hepatitis patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study was used. Clinical profiles of 413 hepatitis patients were reviewed for pDDIs using Micromedex-DrugReax. Frequency, levels and clinical relevance of pDDIs were reported. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds-ratios for predictors.

RESULTS

Of total 413 patients, pDDIs were reported in 55.2%. Major-pDDIs were found in 35% patients. Total 660 pDDIs were identified, of which, 304 (46%) were of major-severity and 299 (45%) of moderateseverity. Patient's profiles of top-10 major-pDDIs were presented with signs/symptoms such as fever, hepatomegaly, anorexia, jaundice, hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, & pedal edema; and abnormalities in labs such as electrolytes-level, alanine aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, bilirubin-level, & serum creatinine. Significant association was observed for the presence of pDDIs with > 9 prescribed medicines (p < 0.001), hospitalization of > 5 days (p = 0.03), and stroke as comorbidity (p = 0.05). Moreover, odds of exposure to major-pDDIs were significantly higher in patients taking > 9 prescribed medicines (p < 0.001), hospitalization of > 5 days (p = 0.002), and stroke as comorbidity (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

We observed hepatitis patients presented with a considerable number of clinically relevant pDDIs. Attention should be given to widespread major-pDDIs and their potential adverse outcomes. Clinically relevant parameters, such as labs and signs/symptoms should be monitored particularly in high risk patients having polypharmacy, prolong hospitalization, and stroke as comorbidity.

Potential drug-drug interactions in pediatric patients admitted to intensive care unit of Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

To investigate frequencies, levels, clinical relevance and predictors of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

METHODS

Case notes of 411 patients were reviewed for pDDIs through Micromedex. Frequencies, levels and clinical relevance of pDDIs were reported. Logistic regression was applied to calculate the odds-ratios for predictors of pDDIs.

RESULTS

We recorded pDDIs in 59.4% patients. Major-pDDIs were found in 34.5% patients. Total 990 pDDIs were identified, of which, 37.8% were of moderate-severity and 30.6% of major-severity. Patient's case notes of top-ten pDDIs showed presence of signs/symptoms such as fever, jaundice, vomiting, anorexia, tachycardia, drowsiness, & lethargy; and abnormalities in labs such as total leukocytes count, blood urea nitrogen, alanine aminotransferase, & potassium-level. Odds of exposure to major-pDDIs were significantly higher in patients aged 6-12years (p=0.008); hospital stay of ≥7days (p=0.05); and ≥11 prescribed medicines (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Substantial numbers of patients in PICU are exposed to pDDIs. Major-pDDIs are of particular concern. Timely identification of pDDIs, preferably with computerized source, is crucial point for their management. Monitoring of clinically relevant parameters and identification of various predictors are needed to minimize or prevent the associated negative consequences of pDDIs.

Renal point-of-care testing: collaboration between biomedical scientists and community pharmacists

The incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing with the prevalence of obesity, diabetes mellitus, elevated blood pressure and other cardiovascular-renal risk factors. Wider point-of-care testing (POCT) strategies in the community setting are needed to prevent CKD and delay progressive loss of renal function. Since publication of the Institute of Biomedical Science (IBMS) Point of Care Testing (Near-Patient Testing) Guidance on the Involvement of the Clinical Laboratory, the biomedical scientist can now provide enhanced services including tests for blood glucose, cholesterol, and monitor blood pressure. Under the current pharmacy contract, community pharmacies are now often equipped with sophisticated record access systems and interfaces to monitor drug interactions in suspect/high-risk CKD patients. Current facilities can be utilised further allowing pharmacists more clinical involvement based on community need. Further development of POCT in the community involving collaborations between biomedical scientists and community pharmacists would allow wider service availability in primary care and might be advantageous in suspect/high-risk patients.

Individualizing pharmacotherapy in patients with renal impairment: the validity of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula in specific patient populations with a glomerular filtration rate below 60 ml/min. A systematic review

Background

The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula is widely used in clinical practice to assess the correct drug dose. This formula is based on serum creatinine levels which might be influenced by chronic diseases itself or the effects of the chronic diseases. We conducted a systematic review to determine the validity of the MDRD formula in specific patient populations with renal impairment: elderly, hospitalized and obese patients, patients with cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis and human immunodeficiency virus.

Methods and Findings

We searched for articles in Pubmed published from January 1999 through January 2014. Selection criteria were (1) patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min (/1.73m²), (2) MDRD formula compared with a gold standard and (3) statistical analysis focused on bias, precision and/or accuracy. Data extraction was done by the first author and checked by a second author. A bias of 20% or less, a precision of 30% or less and an accuracy expressed as P₃₀% of 80% or higher were indicators of the validity of the MDRD formula. In total we included 27 studies. The number of patients included ranged from 8 to 1831. The gold standard and measurement method used varied across the studies. For none of the specific patient populations the studies provided sufficient evidence of validity of the MDRD formula regarding the three parameters. For patients with diabetes mellitus and liver cirrhosis, hospitalized patients and elderly with moderate to severe renal impairment we concluded that the MDRD formula is not valid. Limitations of the review are the lack of considering the method of measuring serum creatinine levels and the type of gold standard used.

Conclusion

In several specific patient populations with renal impairment the use of the MDRD formula is not valid or has uncertain validity.

Checklist for standardized reporting of drug-drug interaction management guidelines

PURPOSE

Inconsistencies and omissions in drug-drug interaction (DDI) management guidelines may lead to harm and suboptimal therapy. The purpose of this study was to define a checklist for DDI management guidelines to help developers produce high-quality guidelines that will support healthcare providers in clinical practice.

METHODS

We carried out a two-round Delphi process with an international panel of healthcare providers, most of whom are pharmacists involved in providing DDI information, in order to select those items that should be addressed in DDI management guidelines (including grading systems that could be used).

RESULTS

Twenty-three panellists reached consensus on 19 items in two main domains. These were consolidated into a checklist of 15 elements for standardized reporting in management guidelines. For each element a description is provided to specify what information should be documented in that specific element.

CONCLUSIONS

It was possible to reach a broad consensus on which relevant items should be included in a checklist for the development of DDI management guidelines.

Feasibility of point-of-care creatinine testing in community pharmacy to monitor drug therapy in ambulatory elderly patients

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

It is often necessary to adjust drug therapy if renal function is impaired in elderly patients taking drugs for diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease that are cleared by the kidneys. Although clinical guidelines recommend regular monitoring of renal function in these patients, in practice adherence to these recommendations varies from 28% to 75%. To determine whether drug dosing is appropriate, pharmacists need have up-to-date information about patients' renal function. In this study, the feasibility of point-of-care creatinine testing (POCCT) in a community pharmacy was evaluated as part of monitoring the drug therapy of ambulatory elderly patients.

METHODS

Elderly patients on maintenance therapy with renally excreted drugs for diabetes or cardiovascular disease were eligible for POCCT. After informed consent was obtained, POCCT was performed by trained personnel. A pharmacist assessed the clinical relevance of electronically generated drug alerts based on the patient's calculated renal function and the Dutch guidelines for adjusting drug dosage in patients with chronic kidney disease. If appropriate, the patient's general practitioner (GP) was consulted and adjustments to treatment were communicated to the patient. The feasibility of POCCT was evaluated by means of questionnaires completed by patients and healthcare professionals (GPs and pharmacists).

RESULTS

Of 338 potentially eligible patients, 149 (44%) whose renal function was not known were asked, by letter, to participate in the study. Of these individuals, 46 (31%) gave their informed consent and underwent POCCT. Response rates for completing the patient and professional questionnaires were 87% and 100%, respectively. More than half of the patients who underwent POCCT had mild-to-moderate renal impairment. On the basis of information provided by patients and healthcare professionals, POCCT would appear to be feasible in community pharmacies.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

POCCT improves the management of drug therapy by community pharmacists and is feasible in daily practice.

Polypharmacy and food-drug interactions among older persons: a review

Polypharmacy is generally defined as the use of 5 or more prescription medications on a regular basis. The average number of prescribed and over-the-counter medications used by community-dwelling older adults per day in the United States is 6 medications, and the number used by institutionalized older persons is 9 medications. Almost all medications affect nutriture, either directly or indirectly, and nutriture affects drug disposition and effect. This review will highlight the issues surrounding polypharmacy, food-drug interactions, and the consequences of these interactions for the older adult.

Comparison of a basic and an advanced pharmacotherapy-related clinical decision support system in a hospital care setting in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical relevance of medication alerts in a basic and in an advanced clinical decision support system (CDSS).

DESIGN

A prospective observational study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected 4023 medication orders in a hospital for independent evaluation in two pharmacotherapy-related decision support systems. Only the more advanced system considered patient characteristics and laboratory test results in its algorithms. Two pharmacists assessed the clinical relevance of the medication alerts produced. The alert was considered relevant if the pharmacist would undertake action (eg, contact the physician or the nurse). The primary analysis concerned the positive predictive value (PPV) for clinically relevant medication alerts in both systems.

RESULTS

The PPV was significantly higher in the advanced system (5.8% vs 17.0%; p<0.05). Significant differences were found in the alert categories: drug-(drug) interaction (9.9% vs 14.8%; p<0.05), drug-age interaction (2.9% vs 73.3%; p<0.05), and dosing guidance (5.6% vs 16.9%; p<0.05). Including laboratory values and other patient characteristics resulted in a significantly higher PPV for the advanced CDSS compared to the basic medication alerts (12.2% vs 23.3%; p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The advanced CDSS produced a higher proportion of clinically relevant medication alerts, but the number of irrelevant alerts remained high. To improve the PPV of the advanced CDSS, the algorithms should be optimized by identifying additional risk modifiers and more data should be made electronically available to improve the performance of the algorithms. Our study illustrates and corroborates the need for cyclic testing of technical improvements in information technology in circumstances representative of daily clinical practice.

Preventing hospital admissions by reviewing medication (PHARM) in primary care: design of the cluster randomised, controlled, multi-centre PHARM-study

BACKGROUND

Medication can be effective but can also be harmful and even cause hospital admissions. Medication review or pharmacotherapy review has often been proposed as a solution to prevent these admissions and to improve the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapy. However, most published randomised controlled trials on pharmacotherapy reviews showed no or little effect on morbidity and mortality. Therefore we designed the PHARM (Preventing Hospital Admissions by Reviewing Medication)-study with the objective to study the effect of the total pharmaceutical care process on medication related hospital admissions and on adverse drug events, survival and quality of life.

METHODS/DESIGN

The PHARM-study is designed as a cluster randomised, controlled, multi-centre study in an integrated primary care setting. Patients with a high risk of a medication related hospital admission are included in the study with randomisation at GP (general practitioner) level. We aim to include 14200 patients, 7100 in each arm, from at least 142 pharmacy practices.The intervention consists of a patient-centred, structured, pharmaceutical care process. This process consists of several steps, is continuous and occurs over multiple encounters of patients and clinicians. The steps of this pharmaceutical care process are a pharmaceutical anamnesis, a review of the patient's pharmacotherapy, the formulation and execution of a pharmaceutical care plan combined with the monitoring and follow up evaluation of the care plan and pharmacotherapy. The patient's own pharmacist and GP carry out the intervention. The control group receives usual care.The primary outcome of the study is the frequency of hospital admissions related to medication within the study period of 12 months of each patient. The secondary outcomes are survival, quality of life, adverse drug events and severe adverse drug events. The outcomes will be analysed by using mixed-effects Cox models.

DISCUSSION

The PHARM-study is one of the largest controlled trials to study the effectiveness of the total pharmaceutical care process. The study should therefore provide evidence as to whether such a pharmaceutical care process should be implemented in the primary care setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

TRIAL NUMBER

NTR 2647.