The Cost Effectiveness of Adjunctive Treatments for Proton Pump Inhibitor-Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Half of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) experience persistent symptoms while on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), thus driving efforts to develop novel adjunctive therapies for PPI-refractory GERD. An economic analysis was performed to establish at what cost and efficacy such potential medications are likely to become cost effective in clinical practice.

METHODS

A Markov decision model was used to examine a hypothetical cohort of patients being evaluated for PPI-refractory GERD in the USA. The model compared 3 strategies: (1) usual care (i.e., upfront diagnostic testing with upper endoscopy ± ambulatory pH testing); (2) use of a PPI-adjunctive therapy after positive ambulatory pH testing; and (3) empiric use of a PPI-adjunctive therapy (i.e., diagnostic testing only after failing empiric treatment). The primary outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (third-party payer perspective) over a 10-year time horizon using a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000/QALY.

RESULTS

In two-way sensitivity analyses varying the cost and effectiveness of the PPI-adjunctive therapy, most combinations revealed that use of the medication after positive pH testing was the most cost-effective approach. Empiric treatment was the preferred strategy only when the therapy was highly efficacious (≥ 87.5% response rate) and low cost (≤ $109/month). Use of PPI-adjunctive treatments were not cost effective when the cost exceeded $1150/month.

CONCLUSION

Use of PPI-adjunctive therapies in those with persistent GERD symptoms may become cost effective when guided by ambulatory pH tests. These data can guide investigators, industry, and payers as they develop, validate, and price new treatments for PPI-refractory GERD.

Randomised clinical trial: Efficacy and safety of on-demand vonoprazan versus placebo for non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) symptoms are often episodic, making on-demand treatment an attractive treatment approach.

AIMS

We compared the efficacy and safety of on-demand vonoprazan versus placebo in patients with NERD.

METHODS

Patients with NERD, defined as heartburn for ≥6 months and for ≥4/7 consecutive days with normal endoscopy, received once-daily vonoprazan 20 mg during a 4-week run-in period. Patients without heartburn during the last 7 days and with ≥80% study drug and diary compliance were randomised 1:1:1:1 to vonoprazan 10, 20, 40 mg or placebo on-demand for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage of evaluable heartburn episodes completely relieved within 3 h of on-demand dosing and sustained for 24 h.

RESULTS

Of 458 patients in the run-in period, 207 entered the on-demand period. In the vonoprazan 10 mg group, 56.0% (201/359) of evaluable heartburn episodes met the criteria for complete and sustained relief; 60.6% (198/327) in the 20 mg group; and 70.0% (226/323) in the 40 mg group, compared with 27.3% (101/370) in the placebo group (p < 0.0001 versus placebo for each vonoprazan group). By 1 h post-dose, vonoprazan was associated with complete relief of significantly more heartburn episodes compared with placebo. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

On-demand vonoprazan may be a potential alternative to continued daily acid suppression therapy for the relief of episodic heartburn in patients with NERD.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT04799158.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Barrett's Esophagus, and Barrett's Esophagus-Related Neoplasia in the United States

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a risk factor for Barrett's esophagus (BE) and BE-related neoplasia (BERN). Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with GERD, BE, and BERN in the United States. Methods: Adult patients with GERD, nondysplastic BE (NDBE), and BERN (including indefinite for dysplasia [IND], low-grade dysplasia [LGD], high-grade dysplasia [HGD] or esophageal adenocarcinoma [EAC]), were identified from a large US administrative claims database, the IBM Truven Health MarketScan® databases (Q1/2015-Q4/2019). Patients were categorized into the corresponding mutually exclusive EAC-risk/diagnosis cohorts based on the most advanced stage from GERD to EAC using diagnosis codes in medical claims. Disease-related HRU and costs (2020 USD) were calculated for each cohort. Results: Patients were categorized into the following EAC-risk/diagnosis cohorts: 3 310 385 into GERD, 172 481 into NDBE, 11 516 into IND, 4332 into LGD, 1549 into HGD, and 11 676 into EAC. Disease-related annual mean number of inpatient admissions, office visits, and emergency department visits by cohort were 0.09, 1.45, and 0.19 for GERD; 0.08, 1.55, and 0.10 for NDBE; 0.10, 1.92, and 0.13 for IND; 0.09, 2.05, and 0.10 for LGD; 0.12, 2.16, and 0.14 for HGD; and 1.43, 6.27, and 0.87 for EAC. Disease-related annual mean total healthcare costs by cohort were $6955 for GERD, $8755 for NDBE, $9675 for IND, $12 241 for LGD, $24 239 for HGD, and $146 319 for EAC. Discussion: Patients with GERD, BE, and BERN had important HRU and costs, including inpatient admissions and office visits. As patients progressed to more advanced stages, there was substantially higher disease-related resource utilization, with associated costs being 16 times higher in patients with EAC than those with NDBE. Conclusions: Findings suggest the need for early identification of high-risk individuals prior to progression to EAC to potentially improve clinical and economic outcomes in this population.

Trends in gastroesophageal reflux disease research: A bibliometric and visualized study

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a disorder resulting from the retrograde flow of gastric contents into the esophagus, affects an estimated 10-30% of the Western population, which is characterized by multifactorial pathogenesis. Over the past few decades, there have been many aspects of uncertainty regarding GERD leading to an ongoing interest in the field as reflected by a large number of publications, whose heterogeneity and variable quality may present a challenge for researchers to measure their scientific impact, identify scientific collaborations, and to grasp actively researched themes in the GERD field. Accordingly, we aim to evaluate the knowledge structure, evolution of research themes, and emerging topics of GERD research between 2012 and 2022 with the help of bibliometric approaches.

Methods

The literature focusing on GERD from 2012 to 2022 was retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded of the Web of Science Core Collection. The overall publication performance, the most prolific countries or regions, authors, journals and resources-, knowledge- and intellectual-networking, as well as the co-citation analysis of references and keywords, were analyzed through Microsoft Office Excel 2019, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer.

Results

A total of 8,964 publications were included in the study. The USA published the most articles (3,204, 35.74%). Mayo Clin ranked first in the number of articles published (201, 2.24%). EDOARDO SAVARINO was the most productive author (86, 0.96%). The most productive journal in this field was SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (304, 3.39%). AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY had the most co-citations (4,953, 3.30%). Keywords with the ongoing strong citation bursts were transoral incision less fundoplication, eosinophilic esophagitis, baseline impedance, and functional heartburn.

Conclusion

For the first time, we obtained deep insights into GERD research through bibliometric analysis. Findings in this study will be helpful for scholars seeking to understand essential information in this field and identify research frontiers.

Consumption of medicines used for gastric acid-related disorders in Australia and South Korea: a cross-country comparison

PURPOSE

The study's aim was to compare the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine 2-receptor antagonists (H₂RAs) and mucoprotective medicines (MPs) used for gastric acid-related disorders (GARD) in Australia and South Korea (Korea) from 2004 to 2017.

METHODS

Prescription data for PPIs, H₂RAs and MPs for Australian outpatients were extracted from the Australian Statistics on Medicines annual reports, with dose-specific and expenditure data obtained from Medicare. Similar data were obtained from Korean National Health Insurance Service claims data. We analysed the volume and expenditure of medicines use annually using the defined daily dose per 1,000 population per day. We calculated which medicines accounted for 90% of use and estimated the proportions of use for low- and high-dose PPIs.

RESULTS

While total utilisation for GARD medicines increased over time in both countries, patterns of use differed. Overall, use was somewhat higher in Australia but increased more rapidly in Korea. PPIs were used more extensively in Australia, while more MPs and H₂RAs were used in Korea. Expenditure and use of low-dose PPIs is escalating in Korea.

CONCLUSION

There were substantial differences in the use of GARD medicines in Australia and Korea over 14 years. Both countries face similar challenges to promote rational medicines use and contain medical care costs. The discrepant prescribing patterns can be attributed to differences in healthcare systems, pharmaceutical policies and demographics. This study provides a baseline to influence more rational use of these medicines. It provides insight into medicines policies for other countries that face similar challenges.

Correlates of gastroenterology health-services utilization among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a large database analysis

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with high utilization of health care services. Diagnostic tests usually are not required to establish GERD diagnosis, but endoscopy is recommended for patients with alarm symptoms such as dysphagia and unintentional weight loss, and those whose symptoms are not relieved by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) therapy. Evidence on the correlates of utilization of gastroenterology health services among GERD patients is limited. The study aim was to examine associations of patient and physician’s characteristics with high utilization of gastroenterology services.

Methods

In a cross-sectional study using the database of the second largest integrated care organization in Israel, data of all adult GERD patients (N = 75,219) in 2012–2015 were analyzed. High utilization of services was assessed using two dependent variables analyzed separately: undergoing two or more gastroscopies or having six or more visits to a gastroenterology consultant during the study-period.

Results

Overall, 11,261 (15.0%) patients had two or more gastroscopies and 23,703 (31.5%) had six or more visits to a gastroenterology consultant. The likelihood of high utilization of gastroscopy increased with age; in immigrants from the Former Soviet Union versus patients who were born in Israel; residents of Jerusalem, the south, the north and Haifa districts versus the center district; in patients with high PPI purchases, and in patients who belonged to clinics in which the physician-manger had no board certification. The correlates were similar for visits to a gastroenterology consultant.

Conclusions

Patient and physician’s characteristics were related to high utilization of gastroenterology services among GERD patients. The associations with age and country of birth might reflect more severe disease. The regional differences warrant further research and interventions at the district level. Training in gastroenterology of primary care physicians without a board certification is warranted.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13584-019-0335-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication for Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Where Do We Stand?

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic, progressive, and costly medical condition affecting a substantial proportion of the world population, predominantly the Western population. The available treatment options for patients with refractory GERD symptoms are limited to either laparoscopic surgery with significant sequelae or potentially lifelong, high-dose proton pump inhibitor therapy. The restoration of the antireflux competence of the gastroesophageal junction at the anatomic and physiologic levels is critical for the effective long-term treatment of GERD. Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) surgery is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment that has yielded significant symptomatic improvement in patients with medically refractory GERD symptoms. In this review article, we have summarized case series and reports describing the role of TIF for patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. The reported indications, techniques, complications, and success rates are also discussed.

Role of saliva in esophageal defense: implications in patients with nonerosive reflux disease

Background:

It has been previously demonstrated that patients with reflux esophagitis exhibit a significant impairment in the secretion of salivary protective components versus controls. However, the secretion of salivary protective factors in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is not explored. The authors therefore studied the secretion of salivary volume, pH, bicarbonate, nonbicarbonate glycoconjugate, protein, epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-α) and prostaglandin E2 in patients with NERD and compared with the corresponding values in controls (CTRL).

Methods:

Salivary secretion was collected during basal condition, mastication and intraesophageal mechanical (tubing, balloon) and chemical (initial saline, acid, acid/pepsin, final saline) stimulations, respectively, mimicking the natural gastroesophageal reflux.

Results:

Salivary volume, protein and TGF-α outputs in patients with NERD were significantly higher than CTRL during intraesophageal mechanical (P < 0.05) and chemical stimulations (P < 0.05). Salivary bicarbonate was significantly higher in NERD than CTRL group during intraesophageal stimulation with both acid/pepsin (P < 0.05) and saline (P < 0.01). Salivary glycoconjugate secretion was significantly higher in the NERD group than the CTRL group during chewing (P < 0.05), mechanical (P < 0.05) and chemical stimulation (P < 0.01). Salivary EGF secretion was higher in patients with NERD during mechanical stimulation (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

Patients with NERD demonstrated a significantly stronger salivary secretory response in terms of volume, bicarbonate, glycoconjugate, protein, EGF and TGF-α than asymptomatic controls. This enhanced salivary esophagoprotection is potentially mediating resistance to the development of endoscopic mucosal changes by gastroesophageal reflux.

Transoral incisionless fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common and costly chronic medical condition affecting millions of patients. It is associated with substantial morbidity and negatively impacts quality of life. Reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus damages the esophageal mucosa and is associated with conditions including esophagitis and esophageal stricture. While GERD is most commonly seen in Western populations, changes in dietary patterns and the global increase in obesity have led to a pronounced increase in its prevalence worldwide. Medical and surgical GERD therapies are costly and pose considerable side effects, leading many to pursue effective endoscopic treatment options. Transoral incisionless fundoplication is an endoluminal procedure that offers patients a minimally invasive treatment option with the potential to eliminate the need for medical acid suppression with a low risk of side effects.

Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Moscow

Limited data exist to determine the prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the Russian population, which might be different from those in Western countries. This study was performed in Moscow on randomized 1065 adults aged ≥ 15 years. A validated reflux questionnaire comprising 72 questions and an additional 29 sub-questions were used. The questions assessed (heartburn and regurgitation) and related (dyspepsia, dysphagia, odynophagia and chest pain) symptoms, the triggering factors of these symptoms, family history and data on demographic and socioeconomic features. GERD was defined as heartburn and/or regurgitation once a week or common. Of the 1065 participants, 42.1% were male and 57.9% were female. The prevalences of frequent and occasional symptoms were 17.6 and 22.1% for heartburn and 17.5 and 21.8% for regurgitation, respectively, over the last 12 months. The prevalence of GERD was found to be 23.6%. The rate of GERD was significantly higher in females than in males (15.4 vs. 29.5%, P < 0.001) and significantly increased as the age of the participants increased (P = 0.011). GERD was present in 20.4% of smokers, 24.2% of coffee drinkers, 21.5% of alcohol consumers and 45.9% of stressed participants. Although the rate of alcohol consumers was lower in those with GERD compared with those without GERD, the rate of coffee drinkers and stressed participants was higher among those with GERD. The rate of additional symptoms was higher even in participants complaining of regurgitation/heartburn rarely, compared with those without complaints. Using the same questionnaire, which makes it possible to compare the present results with those from different countries, we found the prevalence of GERD in Moscow to be 23.6%, one of highest in the Western populations. The rates of heartburn and regurgitation were found to be similar, which constitutes a different result than has been found in similar studies. Additional symptoms should be assessed, in all GERD patients even in the presence of rare complaints of regurgitation/heartburn.

The impact of esophageal reflux-induced symptoms on quality of life after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the prevalence of esophageal reflux-induced symptoms after gastrectomy owing to gastric cancer and assess the relationship between esophageal reflux-induced symptoms and quality of life.

Materials and Methods

From January 2012 to May 2012, 332 patients were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The patients had a history of curative resection for gastric cancer at least 6 months previously without recurrence, other malignancy, or ongoing chemotherapy. Esophageal reflux-induced symptoms were evaluated with the GerdQ questionnaire. The quality of life was evaluated with the European Organization for Research and Treatment QLQ-C30 and STO22 questionnaires.

Results

Of the 332 patients, 275 had undergone subtotal gastrectomy and 57 had undergone total gastrectomy. The number of GerdQ(+) patients was 58 (21.1%) after subtotal gastrectomy, and 7 (12.3%) after total gastrectomy (P=0.127). GerdQ(+) patients showed significantly worse scores compared to those for GerdQ(-) patients in nearly all functional and symptom QLQ-C30 scales, with the difference in the mean score of global health status/quality of life and diarrhea symptoms being higher than in the minimal important difference. Additionally, in the QLQ STO22, GerdQ(+) patients had significantly worse scores in every symptom scale. The GerdQ score was negatively correlated with the global quality of life score (r=-0.170, P=0.002).

Conclusions

Esophageal reflux-induced symptoms may develop at a similar rate or more frequently after subtotal gastrectomy compared to that after total gastrectomy, and decrease quality of life in gastric cancer patients. To improve quality of life after gastrectomy, new strategies are required to prevent or reduce esophageal reflux.

Patterns of proton pump inhibitor utilization in gastroesophageal reflux disease and the effect of restrictions on reimbursement: a nationwide prescription database study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the drug utilization patterns for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) prescriptions dispensed in periods with and without restrictions on reimbursement in a public healthcare system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data on all PPI prescriptions dispensed for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was retrieved from the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) from 1 January 2004 to 31 January 2008. PPI utilization patterns were studied in new and current users of PPI in periods affected and not affected by a change in prescription policy.

RESULTS

The policy change resulted in 39% of esomeprazole patients discontinuing PPI therapy during a 12-month period while 23% discontinued PPI therapy during a period not affected by the policy change. The shift frequency to a different PPI was low, 5% and 7% respectively, during periods not affected by policy change. Despite a required shift in most esomeprazole patients, 64% still continued on esomeprazole. Among the 36% who shifted from esomeprazole to a different PPI, 25% subsequently shifted back to esomeprazole. In new PPI users, the proportion of esomeprazole users declined from 57% before to 20% after the introduction of the policy change.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite GERD being a chronic disease in most patients, there was a high degree of alteration seen in the utilization patterns of PPIs. A high proportion discontinued PPI therapy indicating mild symptoms or remission. The switching between different PPIs was low indicating good efficacy and tolerability in most patients. The policy change was more effective in new PPI users compared with the mandated shift in ongoing esomeprazole users.

Epidemiology of reflux symptoms and GORD

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) occurs when reflux of gastric contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications (the Montreal definition). GORD is a common condition with a substantial economical burden to the community and it has a significant negative effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) while endoscopic findings like erosive oesophagitis per se seem to correlate badly with the experienced HRQoL. The prevalence of GORD varies over the world for unknown reasons, but genetic differences, difference in the Helicobacter pylori prevalence and life style factors like obesity might influence. The prevalence is lowest in East Asia (2.5-9.4%) and higher in Mid (7.6-19.4%) and Western Asia (12.5-27.6%). The highest population-based prevalence is reported from Europe (23.7%) and the US (28.8%). GORD seems to be fairly stable over time both in terms of symptoms and erosive oesophagitis, but the prevalence seems to be increasing both in Asia and in the West.

Associations between medication use and functional gastrointestinal disorders: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Functional GI syndromes are known to be very prevalent, but this may be linked to unrecognized medications use. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of PPI, antidepressant, and narcotic use in the general population, and to evaluate the association between each medication and functional GI syndromes adjusting for potential confounders.

METHODS

In 2008 and 2009, newly revised versions of a validated bowel disease questionnaire were mailed to a community-based cohort (total mailed = 8006) of Olmsted County, MN residents; 3831 returned the questionnaire (response rate = 48.0%). Medication usage, specifically PPIs, narcotics, and antidepressants in the last year, was elicited via three separate questions on the questionnaire. The association between each medication and GI symptom complexes was assessed using multiple variable logistic regression models.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 3515 of the respondents (92%) had complete data (mean age: 61 ± 15; 54% female). The overall proportion reporting PPI use was 20% (95% CI: 19, 22), narcotic use 12% (95% CI: 11, 13), and antidepressant use 15% (95% CI: 14, 16). PPI use was significantly associated with IBS status (OR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.1, 1.7) as well as with GERD (OR = 3.5, 95% CI 2.7, 4.4) and dyspepsia (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.5, 2.7). The association of PPI use with IBS was not explained by coexistent GERD or dyspepsia. Antidepressant use was significantly associated only with bloating (OR = 1.6, 1.1, 2.2).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Some medications that may alter intestinal transit or bowel flora are commonly utilized by the general population, and PPI use appears to be linked to IBS.

Partial response to proton pump inhibitor therapy for GERD: observational study of patient characteristics, burden of disease, and costs in the USA

Background

Disease burden and associated costs are not well understood among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who have persistent symptoms despite optimized proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate disease burden and costs of GERD in partial responders to PPI therapy.

Methods

The Partial Response to PPI treatment: the Cost to Society and the Burden to the Patient in the US (REMAIN US) study was a 12-month, multicenter, noninterventional, observational study of 552 partial PPI responders in the USA. Participating sites were comprised of family practice (n = 30), internal medicine (n = 8), and specialist (gastroenterologist) centers (n = 15). GERD symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and impact on productivity were evaluated from patient-reported outcome instruments. Resource utilization data were also collected.

Results

Patients had a high symptom burden, impaired HRQL, and reduced productivity while at work and in daily activities, despite optimized PPI therapy. Mean annual GERD-related costs were US$9944 per patient, comprising total direct costs and mean productivity loss costs of US$4068 and US$5876 per patient, respectively.

Conclusion

Patients with GERD and a partial response to PPI therapy have considerable direct and indirect costs, along with substantial impairments in HRQL and productivity.

Structured management strategy based on the Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Questionnaire (GerdQ) vs. usual primary care for GERD: pooled analysis of five cluster-randomised European studies

BACKGROUND

Response to treatment among primary care patients with gastro-oesophageal disease (GERD) is variable.

AIM

The GERD Management Project (GMP) evaluated the effectiveness of a structured management approach to GERD vs. standard treatment (usual care).

METHODS

Data from five cluster-randomised clinical trials in adult primary care patients with symptoms of GERD were pooled. The structured pathway was based on the self-administered GERD Questionnaire (GerdQ) and was compared with standard treatment.

RESULTS

1734 patients were enrolled (structured treatment, n=834; standard treatment, n=900). The difference in the mean GerdQ score change from baseline favoured the structured pathway (-0.61; 95% CI: -0.88, -0.34; p<0.001). The odds ratio for an indication for treatment revision at the end of follow-up (structured vs. standard treatment) was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.29, 0.52; p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Management of primary care patients with GERD can be improved by systematic stratification of patients using a patient management tool such as the GerdQ.

Editorial: Novel imaging for endoscopic evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease: seeing is believing

One of the challenges to the effective management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the multiple pathophysiological etiologies that contribute to this symptom complex. The majority of patients with GERD have no visible abnormalities during standard endoscopic examination, and this subgroup of patients, defined as having non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), has a low response rate to acid suppression therapy with proton pump inhibitors. With advances in endoscopic imaging technology, it may soon be possible to better define subtle esophagus lesions in these patients, which may help identify those that will respond to acid suppressive therapy. In order for these technologies to have a role in the evaluation and management of patients with GERD, several criteria must be met. To date, electronic chromoendoscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy appear to hold the most promise based on the existing data and reproducibility of the identified esophageal abnormalities. However, there continues to be a need for high-quality research, as not a single imaging technology has been shown to predict therapeutic response rates in NERD patients.

Randomised clinical trial: a comparison between a GerdQ-based algorithm and an endoscopy-based approach for the diagnosis and initial treatment of GERD

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains challenging. An algorithm, facilitated by a questionnaire, may provide a more structured and cost-effective care of patients.

AIM

To compare symptom control achieved with empirical therapy for GERD, in an algorithm based on the GerdQ (new structured pathway, NSP), with that of current care after endoscopy (ordinary clinical pathway, OCP).

METHODS

Patients with symptoms of GERD, but without alarm features, were randomised in an open, parallel-group study and followed for 4-8 weeks. In the NSP, GerdQ score was used as a basis for both diagnosis and a treatment algorithm. Patients with high likelihood of GERD were treated empirically with a PPI whereas patients with low likelihood of GERD received therapy chosen by the clinician. In the OCP, diagnosis and treatment were based on endoscopy or pH-metry findings. The statistical hypothesis was non-inferiority of NSP to OCP.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients (86.5%) in the NSP and 133 patients (80.1%) in the OCP arm were responders. Overall, NSP was non-inferior to OCP, but not superior (P = 0.14). Patients with high likelihood of GERD had significantly better symptom relief in the NSP (P = 0.03), whereas those with low likelihood of GERD showed a numerical difference in favour of an endoscopy-based approach (OCP). NSP saved 146 € per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

A symptom-based approach using GerdQ reduced health care costs without loss in efficacy. Patients with high likelihood GERD benefited from empirical treatment. An algorithm based on GerdQ may provide physicians with a tool for a more structured care of patients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00842387).

Systematic review: the burden of disruptive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life

BACKGROUND

About one-third of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have frequent and/or severe reflux symptoms ('disruptive GERD'). The relative burden of disruptive GERD on health-related quality of life (HRQL) has not been systematically investigated.

AIM

To assess the burden of disruptive vs. nondisruptive GERD on HRQL.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed and Embase. To be included, studies had to have used validated questionnaires to assess HRQL.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were included. Data on the comparative burden of frequent (ranging from daily to ≥weekly) and severe reflux symptoms were provided in eight and 13 studies respectively; six reported on the additional burden of nocturnal symptoms. Compared with individuals with nondisruptive GERD, those with disruptive GERD had 2.4-times and 1.5-times higher mean rates of absenteeism and presenteeism respectively (five studies), 1.5-times lower sleep quality scores (three studies), 1.1-times lower mean summary scores for physical and mental health (five studies) and 1.3-times lower mean scores for psychological and general well-being (four studies). Increasing symptom frequency and severity both increased the burden of disease to a similar extent. The presence of nocturnal symptoms in addition to daytime symptoms led to worsening of physical health, but their effect on mental health and work productivity was less clear.

CONCLUSIONS

Disruptive GERD is associated with a high burden of disease compared with occasional or mild reflux symptoms. Disease management needs to vary across the GERD spectrum and should be tailored to patients' requirements for optimal therapeutic outcomes.

Male sex, hiatus hernia, and Helicobacter pylori infection associated with asymptomatic erosive esophagitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Asymptomatic erosive esophagitis (AEE) is an easily forgotten subgroup of gastroesophageal reflux disease due to its lack of warning symptoms, despite having the risk of developing complications, such as bleeding, stricture, or even esophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 2843 potentially eligible patients were screened at the health management center of Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital. A total of 1001 patients responded to the survey and gave informed consent; 998 patients who completed the reflux disease diagnostic questionnaire were enrolled. Of them, 594 patients who had no reflux symptoms were included for final analysis. The presence and severity of erosive esophagitis was graded according to the Los Angeles classification. Active infection of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) was determined by the Campylo-like organism (CLO) test during endoscopies.

RESULTS

A total of 14.5% (86/594) of asymptomatic patients had endoscopic findings of erosive esophagitis. In the univariate analysis, male sex and hiatus hernia were significantly associated with AEE. Positive CLO tests had a trend association. Based on the multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR]: 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35-3.98), hiatus hernia (OR: 4.48, 95% CI: 2.35-89.17), and positive CLO test (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.34-0.95) were associated with AEE, as compared to the healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

AEE is not a rare condition, and constitutes 14.5% of the asymptomatic population. Male sex, hiatus hernia, and H. pylori infection are factors associated with AEE. These findings are not only helpful in identifying such asymptomatic patients, but also provide information to improve understanding of the relationship between H. pylori infection, reflux symptoms, and erosive esophagitis.

Oral nitrate reductase activity and erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a nitrate hypothesis for GERD pathogenesis

BACKGROUND

Despite the rich literature on GERD, its cause and reason for increased prevalence remain obscure. Currently accepted mechanisms leave many questions unanswered. Nitrite chemistry at the GEJ is well described for carcinogenesis. Recent epidemiological and animal data have linked nitrates to GERD. "Nitrate reductase" of oral bacteria converts nitrates to nitrites. We hypothesized that nitrate reductase activity is higher in patients with erosive GERD, delivering more nitrite at the gastroesophageal-junction for a given nitrate intake.

AIM

To compare oral nitrate reductase activity of erosive GERD patients with controls.

METHODS

Patients with erosive GERD and controls without GERD were enrolled. After overnight fasting, nitrite of oral cavity contents was measured at 1-min intervals for 3 min while incubating a 10-mg nitrate-N/L solution in the mouth. Nitrate reductase activity was calculated and compared between groups.

RESULTS

Eleven cases (ten males, mean age: 42.6 ± 11.7 year) and ten controls (eight males, mean age: 37.6 ± 9.2 year) were enrolled. Mean nitrate reductase activity was 3.23 ± 0.99 vs. 2.30 ± 0.83 "μg nitrite-N formed/person/minute" in cases and controls, respectively (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral nitrate reductase activity in erosive GERD patients is higher than controls. Therefore, any dietary nitrate load generates more nitrite in these patients. This excess nitrite at the gastroesophageal junction, may potentially contribute to the development of GERD. This is the first report linking oral nitrite production to erosive GERD in man. We suggest that a "nitrate hypothesis" may answer yet unanswered questions about GERD pathogenesis. If confirmed, it may change our understanding of mechanisms of GERD and provide novel therapeutic targets.

Air column in esophagus and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

During imaging of the normal esophagus, air is often detected. The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between the appearance of air bubbles on imaging and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) symptoms.

METHODS

The cross-sectional imaging study was conducted at Rasole Akram Hospital, Tehran, Iran. A total of 44 patients underwent X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanning; the presence of air in the esophagus and visible on CT imaging was scrutinized.

RESULTS

The average age of the subjects was 59 and the male to female ratio was 0.83. We found a significant relationship between the presence of GERD symptoms, the size of air bubbles and esophageal dilation (ED) on the CT scan.

CONCLUSIONS

Air bubbles in the esophagus may be seen frequently in CT scans, but their size and location can vary. The GERD symptoms can arise when a small diameter air column is present within the esophagus, especially in the middle and lower parts.

Structured management strategy versus usual care for gastroesophageal reflux disease: rationale for pooled analysis of five European cluster-randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has a major impact at the primary care level and there is a need to evaluate whether the diagnosis and therapeutic management of GERD in Europe needs to be improved.

METHODS

This project was designed to test the hypothesis that a new primary care management strategy would improve outcomes for patients with GERD, compared with usual care, in Europe. The analysis pools five separate cluster-randomized studies conducted in Austria, Italy, Norway, Spain and Sweden. These studies used a strategy based on the self-administered GerdQ questionnaire to stratify adult patients with symptoms of heartburn or regurgitation according to the frequency and impact of symptoms. A score of ≥8 indicates a high probability of suffering GERD. Patients with a GerdQ impact score ≤2 were treated with generic proton-pump inhibitors according to local guidance, and patients with an impact score ≥3 were treated with esomeprazole 40 mg once daily.

RESULTS

In total, 2400 patients were enrolled across the five studies. The protocols were modified by individual countries according to their local guidelines/requirements. In Norway, the new management strategy was compared with traditional routine endoscopy and 24-hour pH-metry, and encompassed proton-pump inhibitor reimbursement restrictions. Outcome measures differed by country, but included control of GERD symptoms, self-rated health status and work productivity, treatment changes, specialist referrals and physician adherence. GERD-related use of healthcare resources was also evaluated.

CONCLUSION

The pooled analysis will determine whether a locally adapted primary care management strategy for GERD, using GerdQ as a patient-tailored diagnostic and therapeutic evaluation tool, is beneficial compared with usual care across five countries with different standard approaches to GERD management and control.