Impact of bisphosphonates on the risk of atrial fibrillation

Cardiovascular safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of primary osteoporosis: A meta-analysis and systematic review

PURPOSE

Osteoporosis is intimately linked to cardiovascular disease and it has been uncertain that zoledronic acid is not correlated with cardiovascular disease. We intended to assess the cardiovascular safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of primary osteoporosis.

METHODS

We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with osteoporosis receiving zoledronic acid or a placebo. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP from the time of database creation to April 5, 2023. Two investigators extracted data independently on study characteristics, outcomes of interest, and risk of bias based on PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

As of April 5, 2023, our search identified 32,361 records, and after excluding these records, 9 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The overall risk ratio for cardiovascular events with zoledronic acid for primary osteoporosis compared with placebo was 1.15 (95 % CI 1.05-1.26, I2=12 %, P = 0.002), while the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events with zoledronic acid (RR 1.03, 95 % CI 0. 89-1.18, I2=21 %, P = 0.71) was not significant, possibly due to atrial fibrillation (RR 1.21, 95 % CI 0.99-1.47, I2=0 %, P = 0.06) versus the increased relative risk of arrhythmia (RR 1.30, 95 % CI 1.11-1.52, I2=34 %, P = 0.001). Overall, the cardiovascular risk of zoledronic acid for the treatment of primary osteoporosis was not significant; however, the relative risk of elevated atrial fibrillation and arrhythmias remains to be further studied.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with primary osteoporosis, zoledronic acid may increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (P = 0.06) and arrhythmias (P = 0.001) compared with placebo, independent of the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, angina, and heart failure. However, the sample size of men with primary osteoporosis is small, and the cardiovascular risk of zoledronic acid in men with osteoporosis is uncertain.

Drug-induced atrial fibrillation. A narrative review of a forgotten adverse effect

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. There is clinical evidence that an increasing number of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular drugs, mainly anticancer drugs, can induce AF either in patients with or without pre-existing cardiac disorders, but drug-induced AF (DIAF) has not received the attention that it might deserve. In many cases DIAF is asymptomatic and paroxysmal and patients recover sinus rhythm spontaneously, but sometimes, DIAF persists, and it is necessary to perform a cardioversion. Furthermore, DIAF is not mentioned in clinical guidelines on the treatment of AF. The risk of DIAF increases in elderly and in patients treated with polypharmacy and with risk factors and comorbidities that commonly coexist with AF. This is the case of cancer patients. Under these circumstances ascribing causality of DIAF to a given drug often represents a clinical challenge. We review the incidence, the pathophysiological mechanisms, risk factors, clinical relevance, and treatment of DIAF. Because of the limited information presently available, further research is needed to obtain a deeper insight into DIAF. Meanwhile, it is important that clinicians are aware of the problem that DIAF represents, recognize which drugs may cause DIAF, and consider the possibility that a drug may be responsible for a new-onset AF episode.

Electrocardiogram Changes Following Intravenous Bisphosphonate Infusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bisphosphonates are first-line treatments for several bone and mineral disorders. Studies have reported an increased incidence of serious atrial fibrillation in patients receiving bisphosphonates; however, uncertainty remains as to whether electrical disturbances are precipitated by bisphosphonates. We aimed to review the literature for studies reporting electrocardiogram (ECG) findings in patients receiving intravenous bisphosphonates for any indication. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception until January 14, 2023, for studies reporting ECG parameters after intravenous bisphosphonate infusion. We excluded studies that only reported atrial fibrillation. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Continuous data were meta-analyzed if reported in at least two studies. Random-effects models were fitted and reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We found 1083 unique records, of which 11 met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies had a low to low/moderate risk of bias. Six prospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. Five studies used zoledronic acid, whereas one study used pamidronate. Most studies (n = 4) were conducted in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, one study was conducted in patients with bone metastases, and one study in children with osteoporosis secondary to cerebral palsy. Study populations ranged from n = 15 to n = 116. Heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) was significantly longer post-infusion (SMD = 0.46 ms [95% CI 0.80 to 0.11]; n = 67 patients, k = 2 studies, τ2  = 0). There were no differences in heart rate, P wave (maximum), P wave (minimum), P wave dispersion, PR interval, QRS duration, QTc, QTc (maximum), QTc (minimum), and QTc dispersion. The correlation between pre- and post-infusion QTc was not significant (p = 0.93). Overall, there is a weak association between intravenous bisphosphonate infusion and a QTc interval prolongation. However, there is insufficient evidence to support an association between intravenous bisphosphonate and any ECG variable changes, which may precipitate atrial fibrillation. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Antiosteoporosis medications and cardiovascular disease: a population-based nationwide nested case-control study

Purpose: Patients with osteoporosis are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several antiosteoporosis medications have been demonstrated with the benefit of preventing osteoporosis. Our aim is to assess the CVD risks associated with antiosteoporosis medications using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan between 2000 and 2016. Methods: Among 41,102 patients of 40+ years old with newly diagnosed osteoporosis, 69.1% (N = 28,387) of patients were included in the user cohort of antiosteoporosis medicines, of whom 13, 472 developed CVD by the end of 2016, while 14,915 did not. Using the nested case-control analysis in the user cohort (88.0% women and 77.4% elderly), we applied conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of eight types of CVD for the users of denosumab, bisphosphonate, teriparatide, and hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Results: The adjusted ORs of overall CVDs were 0.13 (95% CI: 0.12-0.15) for denosumab users, 0.52 (95% CI: 0.45-0.61) for teriparatide users, and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76-0.85) for bisphosphonate users. The HRT users were at higher odds of coronary artery and peripheral artery diseases, heart failure, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis. Conclusion: Denosumab, teriparatide, and bisphosphonate may have more protective effects against CVD than hormone therapy. Physicians may take subsequent cardiovascular risks into account when choosing an adequate antiosteoporosis medication for patients with osteoporosis.

The Association between Treatment with Bisphosphonates and the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Background: Osteoporosis is one of the most common diseases of the skeletal system, particularly occurring in older adults. Bisphosphonates are frequently used to treat osteoporosis and prevent bone fractures. Studies evaluating the association between treatment with bisphosphonate and the risk of atrial fibrillation have reported conflicting results. This meta-analysis of observational studies was performed to assess this association.Methods: Databases were searched to find relevant observational studies, and the identified articles were selected according to the selection criteria. Sensitivity and subgroup analysis based on various confounding factors were performed. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of atrial fibrillation were estimated using a random-effects model.Results: We selected 12 studies, including four case-control and eight cohort studies, for the meta-analysis. Assessment of the estimated effect size yielded an OR of 1.171 (95% CI, 1.011–1.356; P=0.035), with substantial heterogeneity (I 2 =84.74%, P<0.001). When the studies were excluded one-after-another, the pooled OR remained unchanged in only six studies. In addition, subgroup analyses found that treatment with bisphosphonates was positively associated with the risk of atrial fibrillation in studies performed in Western countries (OR, 1.263; 95% CI, 1.092–1.462) and lower-quality studies (OR, 1.214; 95% CI, 1.035–1.423). No publication bias was observed.Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that treatment with bisphosphonates may be associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. Therefore, bisphosphonates should be carefully prescribed to patients at a high risk of atrial fibrillation.

A Single-Center Prospective Study of 116 Women with Osteoporosis Treated with Zoledronic Acid Monitored by Electrocardiography for the Development of Cardiac Arrhythmia During the Acute Phase in China

Background

Concerns have been raised among clinicians and patients about the cardiovascular risks of bisphosphonates used in the treatment of osteoporosis. The goal of this study was to investigate the acute effect of zoledronic acid (ZA) infusion on arrhythmia development using an electrocardiograph (ECG).

Material/Methods

This prospective study was a self-controlled case series study that recruited 116 female patients with osteoporosis. The patients underwent standard 12-lead electrocardiography before and 1 day after zoledronic acid intravenous infusion to evaluate cardiac adverse effects and the change in ECG parameters after the infusion. Heart rhythm, atrial and ventricular premature contractions, atrial fibrillation, P wave, and QTc parameters were measured using an ECG. A blood biochemical examination was performed for all patients before the ZA infusion. Body temperature was measured twice per day.

Results

Before ZA administration, ECG findings were normal in 47 patients and abnormal in 69 patients. After ZA administration, ECG findings were normal in 35 patients and abnormal in 81 patients. New onsets of premature atrial contractions and atrial fibrillation were observed in 1 patient each, and new onsets of premature ventricular contractions were observed in 2 patients. The heart rate was obviously higher, and the QT interval was obviously shorter after ZA administration, compared with before administration. No significant differences in P wave and QTc parameters were found between the 2 ECG measurements.

Conclusions

During the acute phase, 116 women with osteoporosis who were treated with zoledronic acid infusion did not develop significantly abnormal ECG changes.

Bisphosphonates and cardiovascular risk in elderly patients with previous cardiovascular disease: a population-based nested case-control study in Italy

Background:

In a globally aging population, chronic conditions with a high impact on healthcare costs and quality of life, such as osteoporosis and associated fractures, are a matter of concern. For osteoporosis, several drug treatments are available, but evidence on adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular (CCV) events, and in particular the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), related to anti-osteoporotic drug use is inconclusive. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the use of bisphosphonates (BPs), strontium ranelate (SR), and other anti-osteoporosis drugs and the risk of AF and CCV events in a large cohort of patients affected by CCV diseases.

Methods:

Based on a cohort of patients aged 65 years and over, discharged from the hospitals of five large Italian areas after a CCV event between 2008 and 2011, two nested case-control studies were conducted. Cases were patients with a subsequent hospital admission for AF or CCV; four controls for each case were randomly selected and matched by age group, sex and follow-up time. A total of three exposure measures were tested: ever use, adherence and recency of use. In the conditional logistic regression models, patients not treated with any anti-osteoporotic medication were considered as the reference category.

Results:

The initial cohort accounted for 657,246 patients. Neither BPs nor SR use was associated with an increased risk of AF regardless of the adherence and recency of use. Overall BP and SR use was associated with a slightly increased risk of CCV; however, results reversed when considering higher adherence: odds ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–0.92 for BPs and OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52–0.97 for SR.

Conclusions:

BPs do not increase cardiovascular risk and can be prescribed to elderly patients for osteoporosis treatment. However, patients with pre-existing cerebrovascular/cardiovascular conditions should be carefully monitored.

Effect of intravenous zoledronic acid infusion on electrocardiographic parameters in patients with osteoporosis

We evaluated the effects of zoledronic acid (ZA) therapy on electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters for the first time in the literature. Measurements were performed on ECGs obtained before and after ZA infusion on the same day as well as 1 month after the infusion. ZA infusion did not have any short- or long-term effect on any parameter that might be associated with the tendency for atrial fibrillation or ventricular arrhythmias.

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the early and late effects of ZA therapy on ECG parameters which might be associated with the tendency for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with osteoporosis who were admitted to our clinic between December 2013 and December 2014 and who were scheduled to receive ZA infusion constituted our study population. Twelve-lead surface ECGs were obtained from all patients before and after ZA infusion on the same day as well as 1 month after the infusion. All ECG parameters were measured and compared with each other for each patient.

RESULTS

Data of 100 patients were used in the analysis (9 male; 70.5 ± 11.6 years of age). There were no significant differences between repeated measurements regarding pmax, pmin, and p dispersion values. QT max and QT min values were significantly increased after infusion; however, there were no significant changes in QT dispersion, Tp-e interval, and Tp-e dispersion values.

CONCLUSIONS

ZA infusion did not affect P wave dispersion both at the immediate post-infusion period and 1 month after infusion. QT values were significantly increased early after ZA infusion; however, there were no significant differences in parameters reflecting disparity of ventricular recovery times and transmural dispersion of ventricular repolarization. Based on these observations, it may be suggested that ZA infusion did not have any short- or long-term effect on any parameter that might be associated with the tendency for atrial fibrillation or ventricular arrhythmias.

All-trans retinoic acid shifts rosiglitazone-induced adipogenic differentiation to osteogenic differentiation in mouse embryonic fibroblasts

Rosiglitazone (RSG) is a potent drug used in the treatment of insulin resistance; however, it is associated with marked skeletal toxicity. RSG-induced osteoporosis may contribute to the promotion of adipogenic differentiation at the expense of osteogenic differentiation in bone marrow stromal cells. The aim of this study was to investigate whether RSG-induced bone toxicity can be reversed by combined treatment with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA). We examined different osteogenic markers in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) following treatment with RSG, ATRA, or RSG and ATRA in combination. We examined the effects of RSG and/or ATRA on ectopic bone formation, and dissected the possible molecular mechanisms underlying this process. We found that ATRA or RSG both induced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in the MEFs, and that the ATRA-induced ALP activity was enhanced by RSG and vice versa. However, only the combination of RSG and ATRA increased the expression of osteopontin and osteocalcin, promoted matrix mineralization, and induced ectopic ossification in MEFs. Mechanistically, we found that the osteogenic differentiation induced by the combination of RSG and ATRA may be mediated partly by suppressing RSG-induced adipogenic differentiation and activating bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)/Smad signaling. On the whole, our findings demonstrate that RSG in combination with ATRA promotes the commitment of MEFs to the osteoblast lineage. Thus, the combination of these two agents may prove to be a promising and novel therapeutic regimen for insulin resistance without skeletal toxicity. It may also be a better strategy with which to prevent RSG-induced osteoporosis.

The safety and tolerability profile of therapies for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

At a time when the prevalence of osteoporosis and related fractures is increasing, initiation and continuation of pharmacologic therapies for prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis have declined. This decline has been at least in part attributable to concerns about safety of these agents, such as atypical fractures with bisphosphonates and breast cancer with estrogen/progestin therapy, particularly when they are used long term by older women. However, in many cases, absolute risk of serious adverse effects is small and should be balanced against the larger potential for fracture reduction. Here, we review the safety and tolerability of available therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Taking into consideration their relative efficacy, we also provide strategies for optimization of the risk:benefit ratio.

The impact of preadmission oral bisphosphonate use on 30-day mortality following stroke: a population-based cohort study of 100,043 patients

Purpose

Bisphosphonate use has been associated with increased risk of fatal stroke. We examined the association between preadmission use of oral bisphosphonates and 30-day mortality following hospitalization for stroke.

Patients and methods

We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study using medical databases and identified all patients in Denmark with a first-time hospitalization for stroke between 1 July 2004 and 31 December 2012 (N=100,043). Cox regression was used to compute adjusted hazard ratios as a measure of 30-day mortality rate ratios (MRRs) associated with bisphosphonate current use (prescription filled within 90 days prior to the stroke) or recent use (prescription filled in the 90–180 days prior to the stroke). Current use was further classified as new or long-term use.

Results

We found 51,982 patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), 11,779 with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), 4,528 with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and 31,754 with unspecified stroke. Absolute 30-day mortality risks were increased among current vs nonusers of bisphosphonates for AIS (11.9% vs 8.5%), ICH (43.2% vs 34.5%), SAH (40.3% vs 23.2%), and unspecified strokes (18.8% vs 14.0%). However, in adjusted analyses, current bisphosphonate use did not increase 30-day mortality from AIS (MRR, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75, 1.01); ICH (MRR, 1.05; 95% CI: 0.90, 1.23); SAH (MRR, 1.15; 95% CI: 0.83, 1.61); or unspecified stroke (MRR, 0.94; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.09). Likewise, no association with mortality was found for recent use. Adjusted analyses by type of bisphosphonate showed increased mortality following stroke among new users of etidronate (MRR, 1.40; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.93) and reduced mortality after AIS among current users of alendronate (MRR, 0.87; 95% CI: 0.74, 1.02).

Conclusion

We found no overall evidence that preadmission bisphosphonate use increases 30-day mortality following stroke.

Bisphosphonates and risk of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis

Background and Objectives

Some evidence suggests that bisphosphonates may reduce atherosclerosis, while concerns have been raised about atrial fibrillation. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the effects of bisphosphonates on total adverse cardiovascular (CV) events, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and CV death in adults with or at risk for low bone mass.

Methods

A systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE through July 2014 identified 58 randomized controlled trials with longer than 6 months in duration that reported CV events. Absolute risks and the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of total CV events, atrial fibrillation, MI, stroke, and CV death were estimated. Subgroup analyses by follow-up duration, population characteristics, bisphosphonate types, and route were performed.

Results

Absolute risks over 25–36 months in bisphosphonate-treated versus control patients were 6.5% versus 6.2% for total CV events; 1.4% versus 1.5% for atrial fibrillation; 1.0% versus 1.2% for MI; 1.6% versus 1.9% for stroke; and 1.5% versus 1.4% for CV death. Bisphosphonate treatment up to 36 months did not have any significant effects on total CV events (14 trials; ORs [95% CI]: 0.98 [0.84–1.14]; I² = 0.0%), atrial fibrillation (41 trials; 1.08 [0.92–1.25]; I² = 0.0%), MI (10 trials; 0.96 [0.69–1.34]; I² = 0.0%), stroke (10 trials; 0.99 [0.82–1.19]; I² = 5.8%), and CV death (14 trials; 0.88 [0.72–1.07]; I² = 0.0%) with little between-study heterogeneity. The risk of atrial fibrillation appears to be modestly elevated for zoledronic acid (6 trials; 1.24 [0.96–1.61]; I² = 0.0%), not for oral bisphosphonates (26 trials; 1.02 [0.83–1.24]; I² = 0.0%). The CV effects did not vary by subgroups or study quality.

Conclusions

Bisphosphonates do not have beneficial or harmful effects on atherosclerotic CV events, but zoledronic acid may modestly increase the risk of atrial fibrillation. Given the large reduction in fractures with bisphosphonates, changes in osteoporosis treatment decision due to CV risk are not justified.

Acute effect of zoledronic acid on the risk of cardiac dysrhythmias

There have been recent concerns regarding the risk of serious adverse events, such as cardiac dysrhythmia and atrial fibrillation (AF), associated with bisphosphonate use in osteoporosis. This open-label, non-randomized, crossover pilot study evaluated short-term effects of zoledronic acid and placebo on the occurrence of cardiac dysrhythmias and prodysrhythmic profile in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and low risk of cardiac dysrhythmias. Fifteen postmenopausal women (mean age 70.7 ± 6.9 years) with osteoporosis received placebo infusion on day 1 and zoledronic acid 5 mg on day 7. Standard 12-lead resting EKG measured QT parameters at baseline and up to 24 h after infusion. Continuous 24-h EKG assessed dysrhythmic events and heart rate variability (HRV) for 24 h after infusion. There were no statistically significant differences in resting EKG parameters between placebo and zoledronic acid: QTc (404.28 ± 9.28 and 410.63 ± 18.43 ms), no significant differences in mean serum electrolytes at baseline and after infusion, and no significant association between QT/QTc parameters and serum electrolytes before and after each infusion (QTc: 401.83 ± 17.73 for zoledronic acid and 404.65 ± 16.79 for placebo). There was no significant difference in HRV parameters between placebo and zoledronic acid, and no dysrhythmias were recorded at rest or with 24 h EKG monitoring. Zoledronic acid does not produce dysrhythmia or prodysrhythmic effects in the short term. Among possible mechanisms proposed for cardiac dysrhythmias with zoledronic acid, no serum electrolyte or autonomous nervous system balance perturbations have been reported.

Safety concerns with the long-term management of osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a chronic disease that exerts a significant burden on both individuals and the community. Hence, there is a requirement for long-term treatment to be associated with a positive benefit-risk balance.

AREAS COVERED

In this descriptive review, the long-term safety of calcitonin, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), bisphosphonates, denosumab and strontium ranelate was reviewed based on randomized controlled trials of 3 years or longer supplemented by extension study data and data from large, observational studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Rare adverse events become apparent with all currently available treatments for osteoporosis with long-term therapy. Due to the rarity of these adverse events and to the worldwide burden of osteoporosis, the benefit-risk balance remains in favor of the beneficial effects of treatment on an outcome rather than the probability of an adverse effect. No single antiosteoporosis agent is appropriate for all patients. Treatment decisions should be made on an individual basis, taking into account the relative benefits and risks in different patient populations.

Bisphosphonate treatment and risk of esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies

The use of bisphosphonates and the risk of esophageal cancer have recently received increasing concern and related studies have yielded controversial results. The present meta-analysis of observational studies shows that no clear association between bisphosphonate treatment and risk of esophageal cancer was observed.

INTRODUCTION

Epidemiological evidence suggests that bisphosphonate treatment can increase the risk of esophageal cancer. However, data on this issue are unstable and controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to provide a quantitative assessment of the association between use of bisphosphonates and risk of esophageal cancer.

METHODS

We searched the Medline and Embase databases up to May 2012 to identify studies related to bisphosphonates and esophageal cancer. Summary effect estimates with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were derived using a fixed or random effects model, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies.

RESULTS

Seven epidemiologic studies that consisted of four cohort studies and three case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis. In our primary analysis, bisphosphonate treatment was not associated with risk of esophageal cancer in both cohort studies [pooled relative risk (RR) 1.23, 95 % CI 0.79-1.92] and case-control studies [pooled odds ratio (OR) 1.24, 95 % CI 0.98-1.57]. Evidence for the presence of significant heterogeneity was found in cohort studies (p = 0.009, I (2) = 74 %) but not in case-control studies (p = 0.338, I (2) = 7.8 %). In our secondary analysis, no significant increased risk of esophageal cancer was found in alendronate users (pooled RR 1.08, 95 % CI 0.67-1.75 in cohort studies; pooled OR 1.16, 95 % CI 0.82-1.63 in case-control studies).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current evidences, bisphosphonate treatment was not significantly associated with excess risk of esophageal cancer.

Combination of Micronutrients for Bone (COMB) Study: bone density after micronutrient intervention

Along with other investigations, patients presenting to an environmental health clinic with various chronic conditions were assessed for bone health status. Individuals with compromised bone strength were educated about skeletal health issues and provided with therapeutic options for potential amelioration of their bone health. Patients who declined pharmacotherapy or who previously experienced failure of drug treatment were offered other options including supplemental micronutrients identified in the medical literature as sometimes having a positive impact on bone mineral density (BMD). After 12 months of consecutive supplemental micronutrient therapy with a combination that included vitamin D(3), vitamin K(2), strontium, magnesium and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), repeat bone densitometry was performed. The results were analyzed in a group of compliant patients and demonstrate improved BMD in patients classified with normal, osteopenic and osteoporotic bone density. According to the results, this combined micronutrient supplementation regimen appears to be at least as effective as bisphosphonates or strontium ranelate in raising BMD levels in hip, spine, and femoral neck sites. No fractures occurred in the group taking the micronutrient protocol. This micronutrient regimen also appears to show efficacy in individuals where bisphosphonate therapy was previously unsuccessful in maintaining or raising BMD. Prospective clinical trials are required to confirm efficacy.

Intravenous bisphosphonate therapy and atrial fibrillation/flutter risk in cancer patients: a nationwide cohort study

Background:

There is conflicting evidence regarding bisphosphonates and atrial fibrillation (AF) risk in osteoporosis patients. However, bisphosphonates are used in much higher doses in treatment of bone metastasis and hypercalcemia, but little is known about the AF risk in cancer patients.

Methods:

We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study using Danish databases. All cancer patients exposed to intravenous bisphosphonates during 2000–2008 were matched with two non-exposed cancer patients by cancer type, distant metastasis presence at diagnosis, age, and gender. We used Cox proportional hazard regression to estimate hazards ratios (HRs) of AF/flutter adjusting for important confounding factors.

Results:

Of the 3981 cancer patients exposed to intravenous bisphosponates, 128 (3.2%) developed AF/flutter. This condition occurred in 192 (2.4%) of the 7906 non-exposed cancer patients, corresponding to an adjusted HR of 1.7 (95% CI: 1.2–2.4).

Conclusion:

Intravenous bisphosphonates may increase AF/flutter risk in cancer patients.

Inhibition of osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption by N-methylpyrrolidone

Regulation of RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand)-induced osteoclast differentiation is of current interest in the development of antiresorptive agents. Osteoclasts are multinucleated cells that play a crucial role in bone resorption. In this study, we investigated the effects of N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) on the regulation of RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. NMP inhibited RANKL-induced tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity and the formation of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive multinucleated cells. The RANKL-induced expression of NFATc1 (nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic 1) and c-Fos, which are key transcription factors for osteoclastogenesis, was also reduced by treatment with NMP. Furthermore, NMP induced disruption of the actin rings and decreased the mRNAs of cathepsin K and MMP-9 (matrix metalloproteinase-9), both involved in bone resorption. Taken together, these results suggest that NMP inhibits osteoclast differentiation and attenuates bone resorption. Therefore, NMP could prove useful for the treatment of osteoporosis or other bone diseases associated with excessive bone resorption.