A Health State Utility Study to Elicit Societal Values Associated with Pulmonary Hypertension

Aim

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a rare, severe, and progressive pulmonary vascular disease, which includes five subgroups with similar presentation. Symptoms include dyspnea, and fatigue, and can significantly impact one's health-related quality of life (HRQL). Although treatments are mainly medical, PH group 4, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), can be managed with procedures, ie pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA). Currently, drugs in Europe are only approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and CTEPH therefore the aim of this study was to elicit novel societal health state utilities in the UK for PAH and CTEPH based on disease severity, functional class (FC), clinical events, and treatment procedures specifically for CTEPH.

Material and Methods

Six health states were defined: World Health Organization (WHO)-FC II, WHO-FC III, and WHO-FC IV [defined by the New York Heart Association (NYHA)]; PH-related hospitalization; and "BPA procedure and recovery" and "PEA surgery and recovery". Health states were based on a targeted literature review and two rounds of interviews with clinical experts (N = 4) and patients (N = 6). Draft health states were validated in cognitive debriefing interviews with clinical experts (N = 3). Health states were valued by the UK general public (n = 200), using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and time trade-off (TTO) assessment with the lead time method.

Results

The mean TTO values/utilities were 0.81 (FC II), 0.80 (BPA), 0.78 (PEA), 0.59 (FC III), 0.28 (FC IV), and 0.25 (PH-related hospitalization). Each progression in FC was associated with worse TTO scores.

Conclusion

This study reports societal utility values for PAH and CTEPH in the UK. It provides first utility estimates for states such as BPA procedure and recovery, PEA surgery and recovery and PH-related hospitalization for this population. The results show important distinctions between FC, treatment procedures, and hospitalization, and the significant burden of disease on HRQL.

Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations

Performing longitudinal and consistent risk assessments for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is important to help guide treatment decisions to achieve early on and maintain a low-risk status and improve patient morbidity and mortality. Clinical gestalt or expert perception alone may over or underestimate a patient's risk status. Indeed, regular and continued use of validated risk assessment tools more accurately predict patients' survival. Effective PAH risk assessments are often underutilized even though many seasoned clinicians will attest to using these tools routinely. We present recommendations based on real-world experience in varied clinical practice settings around the United States for overcoming barriers to facilitate regular, serial formal risk assessment. Expert advanced practice provider clinicians from mid to large-size medical centers collaborated to formulate recommendations based on multiple discourses and discussions. Enlisting the help of support staff, such as medical assistants and nurses, to fill in available risk parameters in risk assessment tools can save time for providers and increase efficiency, as can technology-based solutions such as integrating risk assessments into electronic medical records. Modified, abbreviated risk assessment tools can be applied to a patient's clinical scenario when all of a patient's data are not available to complete a more comprehensive assessment. Initial discussions regarding the overall meaning and prognostic importance of risk scores may assist patients to take on a more active role in terms of informed decision-making regarding their care. A collaborative approach can help clinics establish consistent use of risk assessment.

Differences in health policies for drug availability in pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension across Latin America

Treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in Latin America differs between countries, with regard to disease etiology, health insurance coverage, and drug availability. A group of experts from Latin America, met to share regional experiences and propose possible lines of collaboration. The available evidence, regional clinical practice data, and the global context of the proceedings of the 6th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension, held in Nice, France, in February 2018, were analyzed. Here, we discuss some priority concepts identified that could guide transnational interaction and research strategies in Latin America: (1) despite being evidence‐based, the 6th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension proceedings may not be applicable in Latin American countries; (2) proactive identification and diagnosis of patients in Latin America is needed; (3) education of physicians and standardization of appropriate treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is vital; (4) our clinical experience for the treatment strategy for pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is based on drug availability in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and México; (5) there are difficulties inherent to the consultation of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, and access to treatment; (6) the importance of data generation and research of Latin American‐specific issues related to pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is highlighted.

Pulmonary Arterial Remodeling Is Related to the Risk Stratification and Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Arterial Coupling in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary arterial (PA) stiffness has an essential contribution to the right ventricular (RV) failure pathogenesis. A comprehensive and multiparameter risk assessment allows predicting mortality and guiding treatment decisions in PA hypertension (PAH). We characterize PA remodeling with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in prevalent and stable patients with PAH according to the ESC/ERS risk table and analyze the RV-PA coupling consequences.

METHODS

Ten control subjects and 20 prevalent PAH adult patients underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) with simultaneous IVUS study. We estimated cardiac index (CI), pulmonary vascular resistance, and compliance (PVR, PAC) by standard formulas. From IVUS and RHC data, PA diameter, wall thickness/luminal diameter ratio, and indexes of stiffness (pulsatility, compliance, distensibility, incremental elastic modulus - Einc-, and the stiffness index β) were measured. We evaluated RV-PA coupling by the ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (TAPSE/sPAP). The individual average risk was calculated by assigning a score of 1 (low-risk -LR-), 2 (intermediate-risk -IR-), and 3 (high-risk -HR-) for each of seven variables (functional class, six-minute walking test, brain natriuretic peptide, right atrial area and pressure, CI, and PA oxygen saturation) and rounding the average value to the nearest integer.

RESULTS

All PA segments interrogated showed increased vessel diameter, wall cross-sectional area (WCSA), and stiffness in patients with PAH compared to control subjects. 45% corresponded to LR, and 55% corresponded to IR PAH patients. The different measurements of PA stiffness showed significant correlations with TAPSE/sPAP (r = 0.6 to 0.76) in PAH patients. The IR group had higher PA stiffness and lower relative WCSA than LR patients (P < 0.05), and it is associated with a lower PAC and TAPSE/sPAP (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In prevalent PAH patients, the severity of proximal PA remodeling is related to the risk stratification and associated with PAC and RV-PA coupling impairment beyond the indirect effect of the mean PA pressure. The concomitant assessment of IVUS and hemodynamic parameters at diagnosis and follow-up of PAH patients could be a feasible and safe tool for risk stratification and treatment response of the PA vasculopathy during serial hemodynamic measurements.

Development and Validation of an Abridged Version of the REVEAL 2.0 Risk Score Calculator, REVEAL Lite 2, for Use in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Background

Achievement of low-risk status is a treatment goal in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Risk assessment often is performed using multiparameter tools, such as the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) risk calculator. Risk calculators that assess fewer variables without compromising validity may expedite risk assessment in the routine clinic setting. We describe the development and validation of REVEAL Lite 2, an abridged version of REVEAL 2.0.

Research Question

Can a simplified version of the REVEAL 2.0 risk assessment calculator for patients with PAH be developed and validated?

Study Design and Methods

REVEAL Lite 2 includes six noninvasive variables—functional class (FC), vital signs (systolic BP [SBP] and heart rate), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)/N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and renal insufficiency (by estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR])—and was validated in a series of analyses (Kaplan-Meier, concordance index, Cox proportional hazard model, and multivariate analysis).

Results

REVEAL Lite 2 approximates REVEAL 2.0 at discriminating low, intermediate, and high risk for 1-year mortality in patients in the REVEAL registry. The model indicated that the most highly predictive REVEAL Lite 2 parameter was BNP/NT-proBNP, followed by 6MWD and FC. Even if multiple, less predictive variables (heart rate, SBP, eGFR) were missing, REVEAL Lite 2 still discriminated among risk groups.

Interpretation

REVEAL Lite 2, an abridged version of REVEAL 2.0, provides a simplified method of risk assessment that can be implemented routinely in daily clinical practice. REVEAL Lite 2 is a robust tool that provides discrimination among patients at low, intermediate, and high risk of 1-year mortality.

Trial Registry

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00370214; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov;

Analysis of pulmonary hypertension patient survival after treatment in referral center (data of first Ukrainian register)

The aims of the study were: (1) to evaluate the Ukrainian reality of survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH); and (2) to determine predictors of death. A total of 281 patients were enrolled (52 [18.5%] with CTEPH, 229 [81.5%] with PAH). Long-term survival (Kaplan–Meier) and its predictors (Stepwise binary logistic regression and Cox's proportional hazards analyses) were evaluated in adult patients with PH (diagnosed by right heart catheterization [RHC]) within a prospective registry at a single referral center in Kyiv, Ukraine. Follow-up period was up to 51 months. The Kaplan–Meier survival rate for the total cohort was 93.3%, 86.8%, and 81.5% at one, two, and three years, respectively. Survival was better in patients with congenital heart diseases (CHD) in comparison with idiopathic PAH (long rank P = 0.002), connective tissue diseases (CTD; long rank P = 0.001) and CTEPH (long rank P = 0.04). Univariate Cox's predictors of death were: functional class IV (odds ratio [OR] = 4.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.12–11.48), presence of ascites (OR = 4.52; 95% CI = 2.21–9.24), PAH-CTD (OR = 3.07; 95% CI = 1.07–8.87), PAH-CHD (OR = 0.28; 95% CI = 0.11–0.68), HR on treatment > 105 beats per min (OR = 7.85; 95% CI = 1.83–33.69), office systolic BP < 100 mmHg (OR = 2.78; 95% CI = 1.26–6.1), 6MWT on treatment < 340 m (OR = 3.47; 95% CI = 1.01–12.35), NT-proBNP > 300 pg/mL (OR = 4.98; 95% CI = 1.49–16.6), right atrium square > 22 cm² (OR = 14.2; 95% CI = 1.92–104.89), right ventricular square in diastole (OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.03–1.14), right ventricular square in systole (OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.02–1.11), mean pressure in right atrium per each 1-mmHg increase (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.02–1.19). In multivariate Cox regression analyses only presence of ascites, office systolic BP < 100 mmHg, CHD etiology of PH, and NT-proBNP > 300 pg/mL were associated with survival.

The Use of Risk Assessment Tools and Prognostic Scores in Managing Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic, progressive, and incurable disease with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite increasingly available treatment options, PAH patients continue to experience disease progression and increased rates of hospitalizations due to right heart failure. Physician's ability to comprehensively assess PAH patients, determine prognosis, and monitor disease progression and response to treatment remains critical in optimizing outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Risk assessment in PAH should include a range of clinical, hemodynamic, and exercise parameters, performed in a serial fashion over the course of treatment. Approaches to risk assessment in PAH patients include the use of risk variables, scores, and equations that stratify the impact of both modifiable (e.g., 6-min walk distance, functional class, brain natriuretic peptide), and non-modifiable (e.g., age, gender, PAH etiology) risk factors. Such tools allow physicians to better determine prognosis, allocate treatment resources, and enhance the consistency of treatment approaches across providers. Comprehensive and accurate risk prediction is essential to make individualized treatment decisions and optimizing outcomes in PAH.