Shaping Blended Care: Adapting an Instrument to Support Therapists in Using eMental Health

How people with persistent pain experience in-person physiotherapy blended with biopsychosocial digital health - A qualitative study on participants' experiences with Back2Action

Background

A blended intervention consisting of in-person physiotherapy and psychologically-informed digital health, called Back2Action, was developed to optimise the management of people with persistent spinal pain who also have psychosocial risk factors associated with the development or maintenance of persistent pain. This study aimed to gain insights in how participants experienced this blended intervention.

Methods

A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted. Eleven people with persistent non-specific spinal pain who received the blended intervention within a randomised clinical trial were included. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed independently by two researchers. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis.

Results

The analysis identified four themes: (1) Experiencing a better understanding of the relationship between own physical and mental health; (2) Importance of the physiotherapist's active involvement in biopsychosocial blended care, which describes the crucial role of physiotherapists in supporting participants in this; (3) Appreciation of digital health, to better understand persistent pain and make meaningful lifestyle changes; and (4) Trials and triumphs, revealing gains such as better coping, but also challenges with implementation of changes into long-term routines.

Conclusion

Participants of the blended intervention experienced positive changes in thoughts and behaviours, which highlights the feasibility and acceptability of the blended intervention as a more holistic treatment within pain management. The differences in personal preferences for receiving psychologically-informed digital health poses challenges for implementation of blended biopsychosocial care in evidence-based practice.

Blended care in psychosis - A systematic review

Blended-care, a psychosocial intervention combining traditional, face-to-face therapy with digital mental health tools, has shown potential for improving therapeutic processes, fostering patient engagement, and augmenting clinical outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the development and effectiveness of blended-care interventions tailored for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders or other conditions with psychotic features. Our search strategy spanned three electronic databases (PsycINFO, Web of Science, and PubMed) in accordance with the reporting guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We identified 11 papers, each examining the use of one of eight distinct blended-care interventions. Significantly, the majority of these papers (10/11, 91 %) examined these interventions exclusively within controlled research environments, demonstrating both acceptability and favourable impacts on symptomatology and recovery (e.g., 0.22 ≤ Cohen's ds ≤ 1.00). Only one intervention was examined in research settings and real-world conditions, and the shift resulted in low real-world uptake (e.g., only 50 % of practitioners were able to engage at least one of their clients with the intervention) and an inability to reproduce positive changes in clinical outcomes. Additional research is needed to determine the viability of successfully developing and implementing blended-care interventions for psychosis in real-world conditions. An exploration of the developmental processes that could facilitate the transition from research settings to routine clinical practice is vital.

The development of a smartphone app to enhance post-traumatic stress disorder treatment in high-risk workers

Objective

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is highly prevalent in certain populations. However, evidence indicates that many individuals do not respond to treatment. Digital supports hold promise for increasing service provision and engagement but there is a lack of evidence on blended care options and still less research guiding the development of such tools. This study details the development and overarching framework used to build a smartphone app to support PTSD treatment.

Methods

The app was developed in line with the Integrate, Design, Assess, and Share (IDEAS) framework for the development of digital health interventions and involved clinicians (n=3), frontline worker clients (n=5) and trauma-exposed frontline workers (n=19). Integrated iterative rounds of testing were conducted via in-depth interviews, surveys, prototype testing and workshops, alongside app and content development.

Results

Clinicians and frontline workers both expressed a clear preference for the app to augment but not replace face-to-face therapy, with the aim of increasing between-session support, and facilitating homework completion. Content was adapted for app delivery from manualised therapy (trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Prototype versions of the app were well received, with both clinicians and clients reporting the app was easy to use, understandable, appropriate and highly recommendable. System Usability Scale (SUS) scores were on average in the excellent range (82/100).

Conclusions

This is one of the first studies to document the development of a blended care app designed specifically to augment clinical care for PTSD, and the first within a frontline worker population. Through a systematic framework with active end user consultation, a highly usable app was built to undergo subsequent evaluation.

Adapting and Implementing Apps for Mental Healthcare

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe examples of adapting apps for use in mental healthcare and to formulate recommendations for successful adaptation in mental healthcare settings.

RECENT FINDINGS

International examples are given to explore implementation procedures to address this multitude of challenges. There are only few published examples of adapting apps for use in mental healthcare. From these examples and from results of studies in implementation science in general clinical settings, it can be concluded that the process of adapting apps for mental healthcare needs to address clinician training and information needs, user needs which include cultural adaptation and go beyond mere translation, and organizational needs for blending app use into everyday clinical mental healthcare workflows.

Das Beste aus zwei Welten: Eine systematische Übersicht zu Faktoren der Implementierung einer “Blended Therapy” (Gemischte Therapie) in der Psychotherapeutischen Routineversorgung

<b><i>Ziel:</i></b> Diese Arbeit gibt einen Überblick über bisherige wissenschaftliche Empfehlungen zur Implementierung der blended therapy, d.h. der Kombination von Therapien in Präsenz und via digitaler Medien. Die Empfehlungen um­fassen die Themen: (1) wahrgenommene Barrieren von Psychotherapeut*innen, (2) Format der blended therapy und (3) Indikationen für Patient*innen. In diesem Rahmen werden Faktoren aufgezeigt, die Akteur*innen im Gesundheitssystem als Orientierung dienen können, welche Determinanten bei der Implementierung in die Routineversorgung zu berücksichtigen sind. <b><i>Methodik:</i></b> Die systematische Suche erfolgte in den Datenbanken PsycArticles, PsycInfo, PSYNDEX und PubMed. <b><i>Ergebnisse:</i></b> Die Publikationen umfassen vier quantitative, neun qualitative sowie drei Mixed-Methods-Studien. Die bisherigen Arbeiten kommen zu dem Ergebnis, dass Psychotherapeut*innen frühzeitig in den Implementierungsprozess einbezogen und langfristige supportive Maßnahmen für die Umstrukturierung der bisherigen Arbeitsroutine geschaffen werden sollten. Das Format der blended therapy sollte nicht standardisiert angewandt, sondern vielmehr individuell an die Patient*innen angepasst werden. Hinsichtlich möglicher Indikationen werden verschiedene Einflussfaktoren der Patient*innen diskutiert, die bisher jedoch nur unzureichend untersucht wurden. <b><i>Diskussion:</i></b> Bisherige Studien weisen größtenteils homogene Charakteristika und Ergebnisse auf. Forschungslücken bestehen hinsichtlich der Frage, inwieweit sich die Ergebnisse auf andere Therapieschulen, Berufsgruppen und Störungsbilder übertragen lassen. <b><i>Schlussfolgerung:</i></b> Das Review veranschaulicht, dass es wichtiger Vorarbeit hinsichtlich der Anwendungsunterstützung für Psychotherapeut*innen sowie weiterer Forschungsaktivität bedarf, um die Implementierung von blended therapy im Sinne einer möglichen Verbesserung der psychotherapeutischen Versorgung voranzutreiben.

An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services

Mental health concerns are common, and various evidence-based interventions for mental health conditions have been developed. However, many people have difficulty accessing appropriate mental health care and this has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital mental health services, such as those delivered by mobile phone or web-based platforms, offer the possibility of expanding the reach and accessibility of mental health care. To achieve this goal, digital mental health interventions and plans for their implementation must be designed with the end users in mind. In this Review, we describe the evidence base for digital mental health interventions across various diagnoses and treatment targets. Then, we explain the different formats for digital mental health intervention delivery, and offer considerations for their use across key age groups. We discuss the role that the COVID-19 pandemic has played in emphasizing the value of these interventions, and offer considerations for ensuring equity in access to digital mental health interventions among diverse populations. As healthcare providers continue to embrace the role that technology can play in broadening access to care, the design and implementation of digital mental healthcare solutions must be carefully considered to maximize their effectiveness and accessibility.

A Perspective on the Integration of eHealth in Treatment of Offenders: Combining Technology and the Risk-Need-Responsivity Model

While there are multiple ways in which eHealth interventions such as online modules, apps and virtual reality can improve forensic psychiatry, uptake in practice is low. To overcome this problem, better integration of eHealth in treatment is necessary. In this perspective paper, we describe how the possibilities of eHealth can be connected to the risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model. To account for the risk-principle, stand-alone eHealth interventions might be used to offer more intensive treatment to high-risk offenders. The need-principle can be addressed by connecting novel experience-based interventions such as VR and apps to stable and acute dynamic risk factors. Finally, using and combining personalized interventions is in line with the responsivity-principle. Based on research inside and outside of forensic psychiatry, we conclude that there are many possibilities for eHealth to improve treatment-not just based on RNR, but also on other models. However, there is a pressing need for more development, implementation and evaluation research.