Interprofessional Medication Adherence Program for Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled and Qualitative Study (PANDIA-IRIS)

Education programmes for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes

BACKGROUND

Adherence to complex regimens for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes is often poor. Interventions to enhance adherence require intensive education and behavioural counselling. However, whether the existing evidence is scientifically rigorous and can support recommendations for routine use of educational programmes in people with CKD and diabetes is still unknown. This is an update of a review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of education programmes for people with CKD and diabetes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 19 July 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs investigating the benefits and harms of educational programmes (information and behavioural instructions and advice given by a healthcare provider, who could be a nurse, pharmacist, educator, health professional, medical practitioner, or healthcare provider, through verbal, written, audio-recording, or computer-aided modalities) for people 18 years and older with CKD and diabetes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened the literature, determined study eligibility, assessed quality, and extracted and entered data. We expressed dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and continuous data as mean difference (MD) with 95% CI. Data were pooled using the random-effects model. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight studies (13 reports, 840 randomised participants) were included. The overall risk of bias was low for objective outcomes and attrition bias, unclear for selection bias, reporting bias and other biases, and high for subjective outcomes. Education programmes compared to routine care alone probably decrease glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (4 studies, 467 participants: MD -0.42%, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.31; moderate certainty evidence; 13.5 months follow-up) and may decrease total cholesterol (179 participants: MD -0.35 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.63 to -00.07; low certainty evidence) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (179 participants: MD -0.40 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.14; low certainty evidence) at 18 months of follow-up. One study (83 participants) reported education programmes for people receiving dialysis who have diabetes may improve the diabetes knowledge of diagnosis, monitoring, hypoglycaemia, hyperglycaemia, medication with insulin, oral medication, personal health habits, diet, exercise, chronic complications, and living with diabetes and coping with stress (all low certainty evidence). There may be an improvement in the general knowledge of diabetes at the end of the intervention and at the end of the three-month follow-up (one study, 97 participants; low certainty evidence) in people with diabetes and moderately increased albuminuria (A2). In participants with diabetes and moderately increased albuminuria (A2) (one study, 97 participants), education programmes may improve a participant's beliefs in treatment effectiveness and total self-efficacy at the end of five weeks compared to routine care (low certainty evidence). Self-efficacy for in-home blood glucose monitoring and beliefs in personal control may increase at the end of the three-month follow-up (low certainty evidence). There were no differences in other self-efficacy measures. One study (100 participants) reported an education programme may increase change in behaviour for general diet, specific diet and home blood glucose monitoring at the end of treatment (low certainty evidence); however, at the end of three months of follow-up, there may be no difference in any behaviour change outcomes (all low certainty evidence). There were uncertain effects on death, serious hypoglycaemia, and kidney failure due to very low certainty evidence. No data was available for changes in kidney function (creatinine clearance, serum creatinine, doubling of serum creatinine or proteinuria). For an education programme plus multidisciplinary, co-ordinated care compared to routine care, there may be little or no difference in HbA1c, kidney failure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), systolic or diastolic blood pressure, hypoglycaemia, hyperglycaemia, and LDL and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (all low certainty evidence in participants with type-2 diabetes mellitus and documented advanced diabetic nephropathy). There were no data for death, patient-orientated measures, change in kidney function (other than eGFR and albuminuria), cardiovascular disease morbidity, quality of life, or adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Education programmes may improve knowledge of some areas related to diabetes care and some self-management practices. Education programmes probably decrease HbA1c in people with CKD and diabetes, but the effect on other clinical outcomes is unclear. This review only included eight studies with small sample sizes. Therefore, more randomised studies are needed to examine the efficacy of education programmes on important clinical outcomes in people with CKD and diabetes.

The differential impact of a 6-versus 12-month pharmacist-led interprofessional medication adherence program on medication adherence in patients with diabetic kidney disease: the randomized PANDIA-IRIS study

Background: For every 100 patients with diabetes, 40 will develop diabetic kidney disease (DKD) over time. This diabetes complication may be partly due to poor adherence to their prescribed medications. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the differential impact of a 6- versus 12-month pharmacist-led interprofessional medication adherence program (IMAP) on the components of adherence (i.e., implementation and discontinuation) in patients with DKD, during and after the intervention. Methods: All included patients benefited from the IMAP, which consists in face-to-face regular motivational interviews between the patient and the pharmacist based on the adherence feedback from electronic monitors (EMs), in which the prescribed treatments were delivered. Adherence reports were available to prescribers during the intervention period. Patients were randomized 1:1 into two parallel arms: a 12-month IMAP intervention in group A versus a 6-month intervention in group B. Adherence was monitored continuously for 24 months post-inclusion during the consecutive intervention and follow-up phases. In the follow-up phase post-intervention, EM data were blinded. Blood pressure was measured by the pharmacist at each visit. The repeated measures of daily patient medication intake outcomes (1/0) to antidiabetics, antihypertensive drugs, and statins were modeled longitudinally using the generalized estimated equation in both groups and in both the intervention and the follow-up phases. Results: EM data of 72 patients were analyzed (34 in group A and 38 in group B). Patient implementation to antidiabetics and antihypertensive drugs increased during the IMAP intervention phase and decreased progressively during the follow-up period. At 12 months, implementation to antidiabetics was statistically higher in group A versus group B (93.8% versus 86.8%; Δ 7.0%, 95% CI: 5.7%; 8.3%); implementation to antihypertensive drugs was also higher in group A versus B (97.9% versus 92.1%; Δ 5.8%, 95% CI: 4.8%; 6.7%). At 24 months, implementation to antidiabetics and antihypertensive drugs remained higher in group A versus B (for antidiabetics: 88.6% versus 85.6%; Δ 3.0%, 95% CI: 1.7%; 4.4% and for antihypertensive drugs: 94.4% versus 85.9%; Δ 8.5%, 95% CI: 6.6%; 10.7%). No difference in pharmacy-based blood pressure was observed between groups. Implementation to statins was comparable at each time point between groups. Three patients discontinued at least one treatment; they were all in group B. In total, 46% (16/35) of patients in the 12-month intervention versus 37% (14/38) of patients in the 6-month intervention left the study during the intervention phase, mainly due to personal reasons. Conclusion: The IMAP improves adherence to chronic medications in patients with DKD. The longer the patients benefit from the intervention, the more the implementation increases over time, and the more the effect lasts after the end of the intervention. These data suggest that a 12-month rather than a 6-month program should be provided as a standard of care to support medication adherence in this population. The impact on clinical outcomes needs to be demonstrated. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04190251_PANDIA IRIS.

Association between carotid ultrasonographic parameters and microvascular and macrovascular complications in diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The present meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between carotid ultrasonographic parameters and diabetic microvascular and macrovascular complications.

METHODS

All published articles were searched in electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from the inception to May 27, 2023. Common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT), carotid bifurcation intima-media thickness (CB-IMT), internal carotid artery intima-media thickness (ICA-IMT), carotid plaque, carotid plaque score, plaque number, plaque thickness, carotid atherosclerosis, and resistivity indices (RIs) of ultrasonographic parameters were assessed. The odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference (WMD), with the 95 % confidence interval (CI) were pooled to estimate the effect. Subgroup analyses were performed in terms of the type of diabetes and study design. Sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies involving 12,102 diabetic patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Our findings suggested the associations between increased CCA-IMT and the risk of diabetic microvascular (WMD: 0.059, 95%CI: 0.026 to 0.091, P < 0.001) and macrovascular complications (WMD: 0.124, 95%CI: 0.061 to 0.187, P < 0.001) including cardiovascular events (OR: 2.362, 95%CI: 1.913 to 2.916, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses also elaborated an association between CCA-IMT and diabetic microvascular and macrovascular complications. The results of sensitivity analysis show that the association is relatively stable.

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed associations between carotid ultrasonographic parameters and microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. Application of the carotid ultrasonographic parameters could be a non-invasive method for the early detection of long-term complications of diabetes.

Understanding reasons and factors for participation and non-participation to a medication adherence program for patients with diabetic kidney disease in Switzerland: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

An interprofessional medication adherence intervention led by pharmacists, combining motivational interviews and feedback with electronic monitor (EM) drug assessment, was offered to all consecutive patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²) visiting their nephrologist or endocrinologist. Approximately 73% (202/275) of eligible patients declined to participate, and the factors and reasons for refusal were investigated.

METHODS

Sociodemographic and clinical data of included patients and those who refused were collected retrospectively for those who had previously signed the general consent form. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent variables associated with non-participation. Patients who refused or accepted the adherence study were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Verbatim transcription, thematic analysis, and inductive coding were performed.

RESULTS

Patients who refused to participate were older (n = 123, mean age 67.7 years, SD:10.4) than those who accepted (n = 57, mean age 64.0 years, SD:10.0, p = 0.027) and the proportion of women was higher among them than among patients who accepted it (30.9% vs 12.3%, p = 0.007). The time from diabetes diagnosis was longer in patients who refused than in those who accepted (median 14.2 years IQR 6.9-22.7 vs. 8.6 years, IQR 4.5-15.9, p = 0.003). Factors associated with an increased risk of non-participation were female sex (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.4-10.0, p = 0.007) and the time from diabetes diagnosis (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09, p = 0.019). The included patients who were interviewed (n = 14) found the interprofessional intervention useful to improve their medication management, support medication literacy, and motivation. Patients who refused to participate and who were interviewed (n = 16) explained no perceived need, did not agree to use EM, and perceived the study as a burden and shared that the study would have been beneficial if introduced earlier in their therapeutic journey. Other barriers emerged as difficult relationships with healthcare providers, lack of awareness of the pharmacist's role, and negative perception of clinical research.

CONCLUSIONS

Investigating the factors and reasons for participation and non-participation in a study helps tailor intervention designs to the needs of polypharmacy patients. Patients who refused the adherence intervention may not be aware of the benefits of medication management and medication literacy. There is an urgent need to advocate for interprofessional outpatient collaborations to support medication adherence in patients with DKD. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04190251_PANDIA IRIS.

Estimation of adherence to medication treatment in presence of censoring

AIMS

The purpose of this study is to provide a theoretical framework for the analysis of medication adherence based on longitudinal data from electronic medication monitors (EM) and to suggest methods for unbiased estimation of the effect of time and covariates on adherence.

METHODS

After defining the statistical summaries involved in adherence analyses and the assumptions necessary for their estimation, we address the issue of bias encountered when adherence is estimated on censored data. We suggest two unbiased methods to estimate adherence: an indirect method combining implementation and persistence and a second one, based on weights, allowing to estimate the effect of time and covariates on adherence via GEE models.

RESULTS

We applied the proposed methods to investigate the effect of gender on adherence in a sample of 43 oncology patients followed one year. Implementation was higher for men than for women at baseline (98.8% vs. 97.5%, OR 2.08, 95%CI: 1.00-4.35), whereas the relationship was reversed at one year (94.5% vs. 96.4%, OR 0.65, 95%CI: 0.28-1.52). Adherence declined faster in men, with year-end values of 46.3% for men and 92.2% for women (OR 0.07, 95%CI: 0.02-0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Estimation of adherence is a complex statistical issue with longitudinal and duration data, possibly censored, interleaving. This study provides a theoretical framework and suggests methods for unbiased estimation of adherence as a function of time and covariates. This allows the effect of an intervention to be estimated in clinical trials, and helps healthcare providers reframe adherence programs to address covariates such as gender.

Medication Adherence Evaluated Through Electronic Monitors During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Switzerland: A Longitudinal Analysis

BACKGROUND

During the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown, patients included in the Interprofessional Medication Adherence Program (IMAP) in Switzerland continued to use electronic monitors (EMs) that registered daily drug-dose intake. We aimed to understand to what extent patients' medication implementation (ie, the extent to which the patient took the prescribed medicine), measured with EMs, was impacted by the lockdown.

METHODS

Patients participating in the IMAP were diagnosed with diabetic kidney disease (DKD), solid cancer, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and miscellaneous long-term diseases (MLTD). Patient implementation was defined through a proxy: if all patient EMs were opened at least once daily, implementation was considered active (=1), and no implementation was considered (=0) otherwise. Implementation before (from December 2019 to March 2020), during (March to June 2020) and after (June to September 2020) the lockdown was compared. Subanalyses were performed according to the patients' diseases. Subanalyses were performed in patients who used at least one EM in 2018-2019 during the same periods (defined as winter, spring and summer). The logistic regression models used to estimate medication implementation according to the period were fitted using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

In 2020, patient implementation (n = 118) did not differ significantly before versus during (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.84-1.15, p = 0.789) and before versus after (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.79-1.06, p = 0.217) the lockdown. These findings remained stable when separately analyzing the implementation of patients with HIV (n = 61), DKD (n = 25) or MLTD (n = 22). Too few patients with cancer were included (n = 10) to interpret the results. In 2019, the implementation of 61/118 (51.7%) patients was significantly lower during summertime versus wintertime (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60-0.89, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Medication implementation remained steady before, during and after the lockdown in 2020. The IMAP before, during and after the lockdown may have supported the adherence of most patients, by ensuring continuity of care during periods of routine disturbances.