Consumer Wearable Devices for Activity Monitoring Among Individuals After a Stroke: A Prospective Comparison

Cardiorespiratory exercise and self-management early after stroke to increase daily physical activity: results from a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine if the Promoting Optimal Physical Exercise for Life (PROPEL) program increases participation in physical activity up to six months post-discharge from stroke rehabilitation, compared to participation in group cardiorespiratory exercise (GCE) alone.

METHODS

This was a stepped-wedge cluster superiority randomised controlled trial. People with sub-acute stroke participated in the PROPEL (n = 107) or GCE (n = 65) intervention phases. The primary outcome was adherence to physical activity guidelines over seven days at six months post-discharge from rehabilitation. Secondary outcomes were exercise self-efficacy (Short Self-Efficacy for Exercise scale), exercise-related beliefs and attitudes (Short Outcome Expectation for Exercise scale), and perceived barriers to physical activity (Barriers to Being Active Quiz).

RESULTS

Fifty-seven participants (PROPEL, n = 29; GCE, n = 28) were included in the analysis. At six months post-discharge, 6/17 PROPEL participants and 9/22 GCE participants met the guidelines for intensity and duration of physical activity; the odds of meeting physical activity guidelines did not differ between phases (p > 0.84). PROPEL participants reported higher self-efficacy for exercise than GCE participants (p = 0.0047).

CONCLUSIONS

While PROPEL participants reported higher self-efficacy for exercise than those who completed GCE alone, we were unable to find evidence that this translated to increased odds of meeting physical activity guidelines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02951338IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONIntegration of cardiorespiratory exercise with behaviour modification strategies to improve physical activity participation after discharge from stroke rehabilitation increases self-efficacy for exercise when compared to cardiorespiratory exercise alone.Increased self-efficacy for exercise may not increase the odds of meeting physical activity guidelines post-stroke.Improving self-efficacy for exercise during stroke rehabilitation may encourage participation in moderate to vigorous physical activity up to 6-months post-discharge from rehabilitation.

Psychometric properties of wearable technologies to assess post-stroke gait parameters: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Wearable technologies using inertial sensors are an alternative for gait assessment. However, their psychometric properties in evaluating post-stroke patients are still being determined. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of wearable technologies used to assess post-stroke gait and analyze their reliability and measurement error. The review also investigated which wearable technologies have been used to assess angular changes in post-stroke gait.

METHODS

The present review included studies in English with no publication date restrictions that evaluated the psychometric properties (e.g., validity, reliability, responsiveness, and measurement error) of wearable technologies used to assess post-stroke gait. Searches were conducted from February to March 2023 in the following databases: Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline/PubMed, EMBASE Ovid, CINAHL EBSCO, PsycINFO Ovid, IEEE Xplore Digital Library (IEEE), and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro); the gray literature was also verified. The Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of the studies that analyzed reliability and measurement error.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies investigating validity (37 studies), reliability (16 studies), and measurement error (6 studies) of wearable technologies were included. Devices presented good reliability in measuring gait speed and step count; however, the quality of the evidence supporting this was low. The evidence of measurement error in step counts was indeterminate. Moreover, only two studies obtained angular results using wearable technology.

SIGNIFICANCE

Wearable technologies have demonstrated reliability in analyzing gait parameters (gait speed and step count) among post-stroke patients. However, higher-quality studies should be conducted to improve the quality of evidence and to address the measurement error assessment. Also, few studies used wearable technology to analyze angular changes during post-stroke gait.

Exploratory study to evaluate the acceptability of a wearable accelerometer to assess motor progression in motor neuron disease

Motor neuron disease (MND) is a rapidly progressive condition traditionally assessed using a questionnaire to evaluate physical function, the revised amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R). Its use can be associated with poor sensitivity in detecting subtle changes over time and there is an urgent need for more sensitive and specific outcome measures. The ActiGraph GT9X is a wearable device containing multiple sensors that can be used to provide metrics that represent physical activity. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the initial suitability and acceptability of limb-worn wearable devices to group of people with MND in Scotland. A secondary aim was to explore the preliminary associations between the accelerometer sensor data within the ActiGraph GT9X and established measures of physical function. 10 participants with MND completed a 12-week schedule of assessments including fortnightly study visits, both in-person and over videoconferencing software. Participants wore the device on their right wrist and right ankle for a series of movements, during a 6-min walking test and for a period of 24-h wear, including overnight. Participants also completed an ALSFRS-R and questionnaires on their experience with the devices. 80% of the participants found wearing these devices to be a positive experience and no one reported interference with daily living or added burden. However, 30% of the participants experienced technical issues with their devices. Data from the wearable devices correlated with established measures of physical function.

Agreement of activity monitors for assessment of patients with sub-acute stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation facility

PURPOSE

Determine the level of agreement of three activity monitors compared with the gold standard (video review) on the activity level of patients with stroke.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, agreement study was performed on 47 individuals with sub-acute stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Data was collected during one physical therapy session. Individuals wore three device types; Actigraph (AG), Activpal (AP), and stepwatch activity monitor (SAM). Variables assessed were step counts for each limb (hemiparetic and non-hemiparetic) and percent time standing and other.

ANALYSIS

Results from the activity monitors were compared to the video review and assessed for agreement using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and accuracy of mean difference from video observation.

RESULTS

The step counts with the SAM on the non-hemiparetic limb had the highest ICC for step counts (ICC = 0.98, p < 0.001) and were overestimated with 21% accuracy. The SAM on the hemiparetic limb had 9.7% accuracy (ICC = 0.92, p < 0.001). For percent standing time all devices overestimated with poor reliability. For percent other activity time, the AP had the best accuracy and underestimated for both the hemiparetic limb (9.9% accuracy; ICC = 0.90, p < 0.001) and non-hemiparetic limb (8.3% accuracy; ICC = 0.84, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of multiple devices may be warranted to capture an accurate understanding of activity levels in this population of individuals with sub-acute stroke. There are concerns with all monitors and clinicians and researchers should be aware of what measures they are wanting to understand about their population.

Utility and usability of a wearable system and progressive-challenge cued exercise program for encouraging use of the more involved arm at-home after stroke-a feasibility study with case reports

BACKGROUND

Understanding the role of adherence to home exercise programs for survivors of stroke is critical to ensure patients perform prescribed exercises and maximize effectiveness of recovery.

METHODS

Survivors of hemiparetic stroke with impaired motor function were recruited into a 7-day study designed to test the utility and usability of a low-cost wearable system and progressive-challenge cued exercise program for encouraging graded-challenge exercise at-home. The wearable system comprised two wrist-worn MetaMotionR+ activity monitors and a custom smartphone app. The progressive-challenge cued exercise program included high-intensity activities (one repetition every 30 s) dosed at 1.5 h per day, embedded within 8 h of passive activity monitoring per day. Utility was assessed using measures of system uptime and cue response rate. Usability and user experience were assessed using well-validated quantitative surveys of system usability and user experience. Self-efficacy was assessed at the end of each day on a visual analog scale that ranged from 0 to 100.

RESULTS

The system and exercise program had objective utility: system uptime was 92 ± 6.9% of intended hours and the rate of successful cue delivery was 99 ± 2.7%. The system and program also were effective in motivating cued exercise: activity was detected within 5-s of the cue 98 ± 3.1% of the time. As shown via two case studies, accelerometry data can accurately reflect graded-challenge exercise instructions and reveal differentiable activity levels across exercise stages. User experience surveys indicated positive overall usability in the home settings, strong levels of personal motivation to use the system, and high degrees of satisfaction with the devices and provided training. Self-efficacy assessments indicated a strong perception of proficiency across participants (95 ± 5.0).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that a low-cost wearable system providing frequent haptic cues to encourage graded-challenge exercise after stroke can have utility and can provide an overall positive user experience in home settings. The study also demonstrates how combining a graded exercise program with all-day activity monitoring can provide insight into the potential for wearable systems to assess adherence to-and effectiveness of-home-based exercise programs on an individualized basis.

Evaluation of Wrist-Worn Photoplethysmography Trackers with an Electrocardiogram in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease: A Validation Study

PURPOSE

Photoplethysmography measurement of heart rate with wrist-worn trackers has been introduced in healthy individuals. However, additional consideration is necessary for patients with ischemic heart disease, and the available evidence is limited. The study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of heart rate measures by a wrist-worn photoplethysmography (PPG) tracker compared to an electrocardiogram (ECG) during incremental treadmill exercise among patients with ischemic heart disease.

METHODS

Fifty-one participants performed the standard incremental treadmill exercise in a controlled laboratory setting with 12-lead ECG attached to the patient's body and wearing wrist-worn PPG trackers.

RESULTS

At each stage, the absolute percentage error of the PPG was within 10% of the standard acceptable range. Further analysis using a linear mixed model, which accounts for individual variations, revealed that PPG yielded the best performance at the baseline low-intensity exercise. As the stages progressed, heart rate validity decreased but was regained during recovery. The reliability was moderate to excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-cost trackers AMAZFIT Cor and Bip validity and reliability were within acceptable ranges, especially during low-intensity exercise among patients with ischemic heart disease recovering from cardiac procedures. Though using the tracker as part of the diagnosis tool still requires more supporting studies, it can potentially be used as a self-monitoring tool with precautions.

Heart rate responses, agreement and accuracy among persons with severe disabilities participating in the indirect movement program: Team Twin-an observational study

Introduction

Heart rate (HR) monitors are rarely used by people living with disabilities (PLWD), and their accuracy is undocumented. Thus, this study aims to describe the HR response during the Team Twin co-running program and, secondly, to assess the agreement and accuracy of using HR monitors among PLWD.

Methods

This 16-week single-arm observational study included 18 people with various disabilities. During the study, the subjects wore a Garmin Vivosmart 4 watch (wrist). To evaluate the agreement and accuracy we applied Garmin's HRM-DUAL™ chest-worn HR monitors for comparison with the Vivosmart 4. The HR response analysis was performed descriptively and with a mixed regression model. The HR agreement and accuracy procedure was conducted on a subsample of five subjects and analyzed using Lin's concordance analysis, Bland and Altman's limits of agreement, and Cohen's kappa analysis of intensity zone agreement. This study was prospectively registered at Clinical Trials.gov (NCT04536779).

Results

The subjects had a mean age of 35 (±12.6), 61% were male, 72% had cerebral palsy were 85% had GMFCS V-IV. HR was monitored for 202:10:33 (HH:MM:SS), with a mean HR of 90 ± 17 bpm during training and race. A total of 19% of the time was spent in intensity zones between light and moderate (30%-59% HR reserve) and 1% in vigorous (60%-84% HR reserve). The remaining 80% were in the very light intensity zone (<29% HR reserve). HR was highest at the start of race and training and steadily decreased. Inter-rater agreement was high (k = 0.75), limits of agreement were between -16 and 13 bpm, and accuracy was acceptable (Rc = 0.86).

Conclusion

Disability type, individual, and contextual factors will likely affect HR responses and the agreement and accuracy for PLWD. The Vivosmart 4, while overall accurate, had low precision due to high variability in the estimation. These findings implicate the methodical and practical difficulties of utilizing HR monitors to measure HR and thus physical activity in adapted sports activities for severely disabled individuals.

Comprehensive Assessment of the Activity Level of the ICF Using Both Capacity and Performance Measures: A Case Report

Individuals with neurologic conditions seek physical therapy services to improve mobility in their daily lives. While clinicians commonly track activity capacity, measurement of activity performance in daily life is an emerging yet unstandardized practice within routine clinical physical therapy. The purpose of this case report is to (1) provide an example of the structure, clinical reasoning, and implementation of both activity capacity and activity performance level assessments across an episode of outpatient physical therapy and (2) to describe how objective activity performance in daily life tracking supported the physical therapy intervention and education plan. A 42-year-old woman presented to outpatient neurologic physical therapy with a rare autoimmune-mediated disorder with primary goals of independently caring for her youngest child and grandchild, walking without limitations in the home and community, participating in exercise, and returning to work due to deconditioning and dizziness. The patient participated in 12 visits across a span of 4.5 months targeting performance in daily life (steps per day), aerobic conditioning, and vestibular habituation. Activity capacity measurement served as a standardized assessment of what the patient was able to do in the clinic, and activity performance in daily life tracking via a Samsung wrist worn consumer-grade device provided a quantitative assessment of real-world daily stepping activity. Tracking of activity performance in daily life was an essential component of physical therapy management that provided an objective quantification of daily stepping activity to identify barriers and facilitators to increasing daily performance in an individual with a medical diagnosis of Susac syndrome.

Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review

Background

Wearable technology is a leading fitness trend in the growing commercial industry and an established method for collecting 24-hour physical behavior data in research studies. High-quality free-living validation studies are required to enable both researchers and consumers to make guided decisions on which study to rely on and which device to use. However, reviews focusing on the quality of free-living validation studies in adults are lacking.

Objective

This study aimed to raise researchers’ and consumers’ attention to the quality of published validation protocols while aiming to identify and compare specific consistencies or inconsistencies between protocols. We aimed to provide a comprehensive and historical overview of which wearable devices have been validated for which purpose and whether they show promise for use in further studies.

Methods

Peer-reviewed validation studies from electronic databases, as well as backward and forward citation searches (1970 to July 2021), with the following, required indicators were included: protocol must include real-life conditions, outcome must belong to one dimension of the 24-hour physical behavior construct (intensity, posture or activity type, and biological state), the protocol must include a criterion measure, and study results must be published in English-language journals. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool with 9 questions separated into 4 domains (patient selection or study design, index measure, criterion measure, and flow and time).

Results

Of the 13,285 unique search results, 222 (1.67%) articles were included. Most studies (153/237, 64.6%) validated an intensity measure outcome such as energy expenditure. However, only 19.8% (47/237) validated biological state and 15.6% (37/237) validated posture or activity-type outcomes. Across all studies, 163 different wearables were identified. Of these, 58.9% (96/163) were validated only once. ActiGraph GT3X/GT3X+ (36/163, 22.1%), Fitbit Flex (20/163, 12.3%), and ActivPAL (12/163, 7.4%) were used most often in the included studies. The percentage of participants meeting the quality criteria ranged from 38.8% (92/237) to 92.4% (219/237). On the basis of our classification tree to evaluate the overall study quality, 4.6% (11/237) of studies were classified as low risk. Furthermore, 16% (38/237) of studies were classified as having some concerns, and 72.9% (173/237) of studies were classified as high risk.

Conclusions

Overall, free-living validation studies of wearables are characterized by low methodological quality, large variability in design, and focus on intensity. Future research should strongly aim at biological state and posture or activity outcomes and strive for standardized protocols embedded in a validation framework. Standardized protocols for free-living validation embedded in a framework are urgently needed to inform and guide stakeholders (eg, manufacturers, scientists, and consumers) in selecting wearables for self-tracking purposes, applying wearables in health studies, and fostering innovation to achieve improved validity.

Fit for purpose. Co-production of complex behavioural interventions. A practical guide and exemplar of co-producing a telehealth-delivered exercise intervention for people with stroke

Background

Careful development of interventions using principles of co-production is now recognized as an important step for clinical trial development, but practical guidance on how to do this in practice is lacking. This paper aims (1) provide practical guidance for researchers to co-produce interventions ready for clinical trial by describing the 4-stage process we followed, the challenges experienced and practical tips for researchers wanting to co-produce an intervention for a clinical trial; (2) describe, as an exemplar, the development of our intervention package.

Method

We used an Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) approach to co-produce a telehealth-delivered exercise program for people with stroke. The 4-stage process comprised of (1) a start-up planning phase with the co-production team. (2) Content development with knowledge user informants. (3) Design of an intervention protocol. (4) Protocol refinement.

Results and reflections

The four stages of intervention development involved an 11-member co-production team and 32 knowledge user informants. Challenges faced included balancing conflicting demands of different knowledge user informant groups, achieving shared power and collaborative decision making, and optimising knowledge user input. Components incorporated into the telehealth-delivered exercise program through working with knowledge user informants included: increased training for intervention therapists; increased options to tailor the intervention to participant’s needs and preferences; and re-naming of the program. Key practical tips include ways to minimise the power differential between researchers and consumers, and ensure adequate preparation of the co-production team.

Conclusion

Careful planning and a structured process can facilitate co-production of complex interventions ready for clinical trial.

Graphical Abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00790-2.

Physical Activity Monitoring Using a Fitbit Device in Ischemic Stroke Patients: Prospective Cohort Feasibility Study

Background

Continuous tracking of ambulatory activity in real-world settings using step activity monitors has many potential uses. However, feasibility, accuracy, and correlation with performance measures in stroke patients have not been well-established.

Objective

The primary study objective was to determine adherence with wearing a consumer-grade step activity monitor, the Fitbit Charge HR, in home-going ischemic stroke patients during the first 90 days after hospital discharge. Secondary objectives were to (1) determine accuracy of step counts of the Fitbit Charge HR compared with a manual tally; (2) calculate correlations between the Fitbit step counts and the mobility performance scores at discharge and 30 days after stroke; (3) determine variability and change in weekly step counts over 90 days; and (4) evaluate patient experience with using the Fitbit Charge HR poststroke.

Methods

A total of 15 participants with recent mild ischemic stroke wore a Fitbit Charge HR for 90 days after discharge and completed 3 mobility performance tests from the National Institutes of Health Toolbox at discharge and Day 30: (1) Standing Balance Test, (2) 2-Minute Walk Endurance Test, and (3) 4-Meter Walk Gait Speed Test. Accuracy of step activity monitors was assessed by calculating differences in steps recorded on the step activity monitor and a manual tally during 2-minute walk tests.

Results

Participants had a mean age of 54 years and a median modified Rankin scale score of 1. Mean daily adherence with step activity monitor use was 83.6%. Mean daily step count in the first week after discharge was 4376. Daily step counts increased slightly during the first 30 days after discharge (average increase of 52.5 steps/day; 95% CI 32.2-71.8) and remained stable during the 30-90 day period after discharge. Mean step count difference between step activity monitor and manual tally was –4.8 steps (–1.8%). Intraclass correlation coefficients for step counts and 2-minute walk, standing balance, and 4-meter gait speed at discharge were 0.41 (95% CI –0.14 to 0.75), –0.12 (95% CI –0.67 to 0.64), and 0.17 (95% CI –0.46 to 0.66), respectively. Values were similarly poor at 30 days.

Conclusions

The use of consumer-grade Fitbit Charge HR in patients with recent mild stroke is feasible with reasonable adherence and accuracy. There was poor correlation between step counts and gait speed, balance, and endurance. Further research is needed to evaluate the association between step counts and other outcomes relevant to patients, including patient-reported outcomes and measures of physical function.

Electronic wearable device and physical activity among US adults: An analysis of 2019 HINTS data

BACKGROUND

Promoting physical activity is one of the most critical components in strategies to improve both individual and population health. Previous studies on electronic wearable devices (EWDs) have shown modest improvements in physical activity, including daily steps and energy expenditures. Large population-based evidence on EWDs and physical activity is needed to better understand the patterns of EWD use and physical activity.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used data from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2019. We calculated weighted frequencies and prevalence of EWD utilization. Wald Chi-square test was used to compare individual characteristics by EWD use, and multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to examine the associations between EWD use and physical activity level while adjusting for sociodemographic/health-related characteristics.

RESULTS

The final sample included 4219 respondents representing 212,976,500 US adults aged 18 years or older. The overall utilization of EWDs in this group was 28.2 % (95 % CI, 26.0-30.5%). Respondents who used EWDs were more likely to have 150 min/week or over physical activities compared to those who did not use EWDs in the past 12 months (OR, 1.53, 95 % CI, 1.16-2.02). When restricting the analaysis to those with chronic conditions only, EWD use was still associated with higher level of physical activity (OR, 1.74, 95 % CI, 1.02-2.98).

CONCLUSIONS

About three in ten Americans reported using EWDs in the past year. EWD use seems to be associated with achieving a higher level of physical activity. Further studies are needed to examine the effect of EWD use on other clinical measures and subsequent health outcomes.

Implementation of Wearable Sensing Technology for Movement: Pushing Forward into the Routine Physical Rehabilitation Care Field

While the promise of wearable sensor technology to transform physical rehabilitation has been around for a number of years, the reality is that wearable sensor technology for the measurement of human movement has remained largely confined to rehabilitation research labs with limited ventures into clinical practice. The purposes of this paper are to: (1) discuss the major barriers in clinical practice and available wearable sensing technology; (2) propose benchmarks for wearable device systems that would make it feasible to implement them in clinical practice across the world and (3) evaluate a current wearable device system against the benchmarks as an example. If we can overcome the barriers and achieve the benchmarks collectively, the field of rehabilitation will move forward towards better movement interventions that produce improved function not just in the clinic or lab, but out in peoples' homes and communities.

Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review

Background

Consumer-wearable activity trackers are small electronic devices that record fitness and health-related measures.

Objective

The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the validity and reliability of commercial wearables in measuring step count, heart rate, and energy expenditure.

Methods

We identified devices to be included in the review. Database searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and SPORTDiscus, and only articles published in the English language up to May 2019 were considered. Studies were excluded if they did not identify the device used and if they did not examine the validity or reliability of the device. Studies involving the general population and all special populations were included. We operationalized validity as criterion validity (as compared with other measures) and construct validity (degree to which the device is measuring what it claims). Reliability measures focused on intradevice and interdevice reliability.

Results

We included 158 publications examining nine different commercial wearable device brands. Fitbit was by far the most studied brand. In laboratory-based settings, Fitbit, Apple Watch, and Samsung appeared to measure steps accurately. Heart rate measurement was more variable, with Apple Watch and Garmin being the most accurate and Fitbit tending toward underestimation. For energy expenditure, no brand was accurate. We also examined validity between devices within a specific brand.

Conclusions

Commercial wearable devices are accurate for measuring steps and heart rate in laboratory-based settings, but this varies by the manufacturer and device type. Devices are constantly being upgraded and redesigned to new models, suggesting the need for more current reviews and research.

Activity monitor use among persons with multiple sclerosis: Report on rate, pattern, and association with physical activity levels

BACKGROUND

Commercially available activity monitors are a promising approach for tracking and changing physical activity in multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE

This study reports on the rate and pattern of activity monitor use in persons with multiple sclerosis, and compares self-reported physical activity levels between persons who do wear and those who do not wear activity monitors.

METHODS

Participants completed a cross-sectional survey that included a demographic and clinical characteristics scale, activity monitor use questionnaire, and Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) for measuring total and health-promoting physical activity.

RESULTS

Of the 629 participants who completed the full survey, 249 (40%) reported using an activity monitor. The most common activity monitors were Fitbit, Apple watch, iPhone, and Garmin. There was a significant (p < 0.05), moderate difference (d = 0.5) in GLTEQ total scores between activity monitor users (36.6 ± 23.9) and non-users (25.0 ± 22.2), and in GLTEQ Health Contribution Score between activity monitor users (25.6 ± 22.3) and non-users (14.6 ± 18.9) (p < 0.05, d = 0.5). Self-reported steps from the activity monitor were significantly correlated with GLTEQ total score (ρ = 0.45; r = 0.36) and GLTEQ Health Contribution Score (ρ = 0.41; r = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

Activity monitor use is common among persons with multiple sclerosis, and activity monitor users report more total and health-promoting physical activity; this warrants further research investigating how devices may be used as a behavioral intervention tool.

Applying a User-Centered Approach to Building a Mobile Personal Health Record App: Development and Usability Study

Background

A personal health record (PHR) system encourages patients to engage with their own health care by giving them the ability to manage and keep track of their own health data. Of the numerous PHR systems available in the market, many are Web-based patient portals and a few are mobile apps. They have mainly been created by hospitals and electronic health record (EHR) vendors. One major limitation of these hospital-created PHR systems is that patients can only view specific health data extracted from their EHR. Patients do not have the freedom to add important personal health data they collect in their daily lives into their PHR. Therefore, there is an information gap between clinical visits.

Objective

The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new mobile PHR app that can be easily used to manage various types of personal health data to fill the information gap.

Methods

A user-centered approach was used to guide the development and evaluation of the new mobile PHR app. There were three steps in this study: needs assessment, app design and development, and conducting a usability study. First, a large-scale questionnaire study was conducted with the general population to gain an understanding of their needs and expectations with regard to a mobile PHR app. A mobile PHR app for personal medical data tracking and management was then created based on the results of the questionnaire study. End users were actively involved in all stages of the app development. Finally, a usability study was performed with participants to evaluate the usability of the mobile PHR app, which involved asking participants to finish a set of tasks and to respond to a usability questionnaire.

Results

In the questionnaire study for needs assessment, there were 609 participants in total. The answers from these participants revealed that they wanted to manage various types of personal health data in a mobile PHR app. Participants also reported some features they desired to have in the app. On the basis of the needs assessment findings, a new mobile PHR app (PittPHR) was created with 6 major modules: health records, history, trackers, contacts, appointments, and resources. This app allows users to customize the trackers according to their needs. In the usability study, there were 15 participants. The usability study participants expressed satisfaction with the app and provided comments and suggestions for further development.

Conclusions

This new mobile PHR app provides options for users to manage a wide range of personal health data conveniently in one place. The app fills the information gap between clinical visits. The study results indicated that this new mobile PHR app meets the need of users and that users welcome this app.

Perceived user preferences and usability evaluation of mainstream wearable devices for health monitoring

BACKGROUND

There are many problems with fitness trackers, such as device usability, which limit their large-scale application, and relevant studies are limited in terms of their sample size and evaluation methods. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the perceived usability of various mainstream fitness trackers on the market, and to learn about user feedback on feature preferences for each device.

METHODS

Trial use of seven mainstream fitness trackers (two smart watches and five smart wristbands) followed by a survey study were applied. The questionnaire was specifically developed for this study, which included two parts (user preferences and device usability in five dimensions). We recruited users to test the devices for at least 30 days and asked experienced users to provide feedback in order to evaluate each device, including the rating and user preference of each device.

RESULTS

We received 388 valid questionnaires, in which users rated their responses on a five-point Likert scale. (1) User preference: the average user satisfaction was 3.50-3.86 (points), and the rating for willingness to buy averaged between 3.36 and 3.59. More users were willing to wear (58.3-81.3%) and purchase (56.8-83.0%) the devices than were not. The top three general feature preferences were daily activity tracking, heart health monitoring, and professional fitness tracking. The top three health-related feature preferences were heart rate monitoring, daily pedometer, and professional fitness tracking. (2) Usability evaluation: product design was rated from 3.57 to 4.00; durability, 3.63-4.26; ease of use, 3.70-3.90; added features, 3.30-3.83; and user-rated accuracy, 3.44-3.78. A significant difference was observed in the rating of product design and durability among the different devices (p < 0.05) score.

CONCLUSIONS

Users generally had positive subjective intent regarding fitness trackers but were less satisfied with their cost effectiveness. The users preferred health related features such as heart health monitoring, and professional fitness tracking. The rating of most of the current mainstream fitness trackers was fair with some significant differences among the devices. Thus, further improvement is needed.