1
|
Herron K, Bradshaw A, Liptrot M, Wieringa G, Mathews K, Wiles J, Johnson S. Moving pain management programmes into the digital age: development and evaluation of an online PMP for people with chronic pain. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2024; 5:1337734. [PMID: 38638532 PMCID: PMC11024331 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1337734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction In response to Coronovirus Disease (COVID-19) health care restrictions, the pain management programme delivered group treatment digitally (OPMP). We aimed to: 1) evaluate pain related outcomes of the OPMP, 2) evaluate patient satisfaction and qualitive feedback of the OPMP and 3) compare OPMP outcomes with the pre-pandemic face to face (F2F) PMP outcomes. Methods Age, gender, pain duration, occupational status, referral information and patient satisfaction data were collected. Pre- and post-treatment pain related outcomes were compared by calculating mean difference, benchmarking with effect size (Cohen's d) and determining clinically significant change (CSC) for OPMP and F2F PMP. Results Two-hundred and thirty-seven patients provided outcome data, with 60 completing the OPMP and 177 completing the F2F PMP. OPMP patients were 10 years younger than the F2F PMP (44.8 vs 53.3), more were female (6.5:1 vs 2.8:1), more were working (45% vs 27%) and fewer were retired (3% vs 17%). The OPMP showed improvements comparable to the F2F PMP. Large effect size was reported across all outcome domains including objective physical outcomes. Eighty-one percent of OPMP patients were 'extremely likely' to recommend the programme but just over 50% of patients felt F2F would provide greater clinical benefits. Conclusion The results support that OPMP is effective for carefully selected patients following a multidisciplinary team assessment however more complex cases still require F2F PMP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Herron
- The Pain Management Programme, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Bradshaw
- The Pain Management Programme, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Liptrot
- The Pain Management Programme, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Gina Wieringa
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Kerry Mathews
- The Pain Management Programme, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - John Wiles
- The Pain Management Programme, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Selina Johnson
- The Pain Management Programme, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peolsson A, Nilsing Strid E, Peterson G. Novel Internet Support for Neck-Specific Rehabilitation Improves Work-Related Outcomes to the Same Extent as Extensive Visits to a Physiotherapy Clinic in Individuals with Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Prospective Randomised Study. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2024:10.1007/s10926-024-10176-0. [PMID: 38526764 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10176-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To address the current lack of information about work-related factors for individuals with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) we investigated the effectiveness of 3 months of neck-specific rehabilitation with internet support in combination with four physiotherapy visits (NSEIT) compared to the same exercises performed twice a week (24 times) at a physiotherapy clinic (NSE). METHODS This is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial regarding secondary outcomes of work-related factors in 140 individuals with chronic moderate/severe WAD with 3- and 15-month follow-up. RESULTS There were no group differences between NSE and NSEIT in the Work Ability Scale or work subscales of the Neck Disability Index, Whiplash Disability Questionnaire or Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ-work). Both groups improved in all work-related outcome measures, except for FABQ-work after the 3-month intervention and results were maintained at the 15-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Despite fewer physiotherapy visits for the NSEIT group, there were no group differences between NSEIT and NSE, with improvements in most work-related measures maintained at the 15-month follow-up. The results of the present study are promising for those with remaining work ability problems after a whiplash injury. Protocol registered before data collection started: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03022812.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneli Peolsson
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Clinical Medicine, Linköping University, 58185, Linköping, Sweden.
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Emma Nilsing Strid
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University Health Care Research Centre, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Gunnel Peterson
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hong SJ, Park J, Park S, Eze B, Dorsey SG, Starkweather A, Kim K. Software-based interventions for low back pain management: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nurs Scholarsh 2024; 56:206-226. [PMID: 37817392 DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Using software for self-management interventions can improve health outcomes for individuals with low back pain, but there is a dearth of research to confirm its effectiveness. Additionally, no known research has evaluated the effective elements of software-based interventions for low back pain self-management components. This study aimed to synthesize the effectiveness of software-based interventions to promote self-management health outcomes among individuals with low back pain. DESIGN A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. METHODS Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement, relevant studies up to July 2022 were searched via four electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science. RESULTS 4908 adults with low back pain who participated in 23 studies were included. Software-based interventions were effective in reducing fear avoidance (mean difference [MD] = -0.95, 95% CI: -1.45 to -0.44), pain catastrophizing (MD = -1.31, 95% CI: -1.84 to -0.78), disability (MD = -8.21, 95% CI: -13.02 to -3.39), and pain intensity (MD = -0.86, 95% CI: -1.17 to -0.55). Specifically, interventions that included an exercise component were more effective in reducing pain and disability. Additionally, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention significantly reduced fear avoidance and pain catastrophizing but had no noticeable impact on disability and pain compared to standard treatment. The certainty of the evidence in this review varied from very low to high across outcomes. The heterogeneity of the study results was significant, suggesting that future studies in this area could optimize the design, time points, measures, and outcomes to strengthen the evidence. CONCLUSIONS Low back pain self-management interventions delivered through software-based programs effectively reduce pain intensity, disability, fear avoidance, and pain catastrophizing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Low back pain is among the most common reasons for seeking healthcare visits. Combining exercise and counseling through soft-based programs may effectively address this issue and its associated suffering and disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se Jin Hong
- College of Nursing, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Jinkyung Park
- College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, South Korea
| | - Soyeon Park
- College of Nursing, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Bright Eze
- School of Nursing, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA
| | - Susan G Dorsey
- School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Kyounghae Kim
- College of Nursing, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
- Nursing Research Institute, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
- BK21 FOUR R&E Center for Learning Health Systems, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Blake H, Chaplin WJ, Wainwright E, Taylor G, McNamee P, McWilliams D, Abbott-Fleming V, Holmes J, Fecowycz A, Walsh DA, Walker-Bone K. The Web-Based Pain-at-Work Toolkit With Telephone Support for Employees With Chronic or Persistent Pain: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e51474. [PMID: 37902814 PMCID: PMC10644198 DOI: 10.2196/51474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic or persistent pain affects one's ability to work or be productive at work, generating high societal and economic burden. However, the provision of work-related advice and support for people with chronic pain is variable or lacking. The Pain-at-Work (PAW) Toolkit was cocreated with people who live with pain, health care professionals, and employers. It aims to increase knowledge about employee rights and how to access support for managing a painful chronic condition in the workplace and provides advice on lifestyle behaviors that facilitate the management of chronic pain. OBJECTIVE We aimed to establish the feasibility of conducting a definitive cluster randomized controlled trial comparing access to the PAW Toolkit and telephone support calls from an occupational therapist (PAW) with treatment as usual (ie, standard support from their employer). Our primary outcomes are establishing parameters of feasibility, acceptability, usability, and safety of this digital workplace health intervention. We will assess the candidate primary and secondary outcomes' feasibility and test research processes for a definitive trial. METHODS This is an open-label, parallel 2-arm pragmatic feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial with exploratory health economics analysis and a nested qualitative interview study. We aim to recruit 120 participants from at least 8 workplace clusters (any type, >10 employees) in England. The recruitment of workplaces occurs via personal approach, and the recruitment of individual participants is web based. Eligible participants are vocationally active adults aged ≥18 years with internet access and self-reporting chronic pain interfering with their ability to undertake or enjoy productive work. A restricted 1:1 cluster-level randomization is used to allocate employment settings to PAW or treatment as usual; participants are unblinded to group allocation. Following site- and individual-level consent, participants complete a web-based baseline survey (time 0), including measures of work capacity, health and well-being, and health care resource use. Follow-up is performed at 3 months (time 1) and 6 months (time 2). Feasibility outcomes relate to recruitment; intervention fidelity (eg, delivery, reach, uptake, and engagement); retention; and follow-up. Qualitative evaluation (time 2) is mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior model and will explore intervention acceptability to employees and employers, along with individual and contextual factors influencing the delivery and uptake of the intervention. RESULTS Ethics approval was obtained in March 2023. Trial recruitment began in June 2023. CONCLUSIONS The PAW Toolkit is the first evidence-based digital health intervention aimed at supporting the self-management of chronic or persistent pain at work. This study will inform the design of a definitive trial, including sample size estimation, approaches to cluster site identification, primary and secondary outcomes' selection, and the final health economic model. Findings will inform approaches for the future delivery of this digital health intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05838677; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05838677. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/51474.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Blake
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Wendy J Chaplin
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Elaine Wainwright
- Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health (Epidemiology Group), School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Gordon Taylor
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Paul McNamee
- Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel McWilliams
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jain Holmes
- Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Aaron Fecowycz
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - David Andrew Walsh
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Walker-Bone
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Scott W, Park C, Christopoulos G, Vogel S, Draper-Rodi J. [Remote management of musculoskeletal pain : A pragmatic approach to the implementation of video and phone consultations in musculoskeletal practice. German version]. Schmerz 2023; 37:360-371. [PMID: 35834004 PMCID: PMC9281242 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-022-00659-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Remote consultations through phone or video are gaining in importance for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain across a range of health care providers. However, there is a plethora of technical options for practitioners to choose from, and there are various challenges in the adaptation of clinical processes as well as several special considerations regarding regulatory context and patient management. Practitioners are faced with a lack of high-quality peer-reviewed resources to guide the planning and practical implementation of remote consultations. OBJECTIVES This Clinical Update seeks to provide practical guidance for the planning and implementation of remote consultations for the management and treatment of people with musculoskeletal pain. METHODS Recommendations are based on a brief overview of the relevant research regarding phone and video consultations for musculoskeletal practice and derived from the literature, relevant guidelines, and practical experience. RESULTS The technical feasibility of remote consultations for musculoskeletal complaints is good, patient satisfaction is high, and a growing body of evidence supports its comparative effectiveness to in-person consultations in some circumstances for improving pain and functioning. We consider in detail practical aspects such as the choosing of hardware and software, we touch on the legal and regulatory context, and we focus on the adaptation of clinical processes and communication. CONCLUSION This Clinical Update draws together best-practice evidence in a practically applicable format, enabling therapists who are working with people with pain to directly apply this knowledge to their individual clinical settings and the requirements of their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hohenschurz-Schmidt
- Department, Surgery and Cancer, Pain Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, 4th Floor, 369 Fulham Road, SW10 9NH, London, Großbritannien.
| | - Whitney Scott
- Psychology Department, Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, Großbritannien
- INPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, Großbritannien
| | - Charlie Park
- IPRS Triage and Remote Management Team, IPRS Health Limited, Little Blakenham, Suffolk, Großbritannien
| | - Georgios Christopoulos
- First Contact Practitioner, MSc Neuromusculoskeletal Care, BSc (Hons) Physiotherapy, HCPC CSP, Staffordshire, Großbritannien
| | - Steven Vogel
- Research Centre, University College of Osteopathy, London, Großbritannien
| | - Jerry Draper-Rodi
- Research Centre, University College of Osteopathy, London, Großbritannien
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lutsch AG, Baumeister H, Paganini S, Sander LB, Terhorst Y, Domhardt M. Mechanisms of change in digital cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in patients with chronic back pain: A mediation analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Behav Res Ther 2023; 168:104369. [PMID: 37531807 DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While there is evolving knowledge on change processes of digital cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in the treatment of depression, little is known about how these interventions produce therapeutic change in the comorbid constellation of chronic back pain (CBP). Here, we examined whether the effects of a digital intervention to treat depression in patients with CBP are mediated by three pain-related variables (i.e., pain self-efficacy, pain-related disability, pain intensity). METHODS This study is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial conducted in routine care at 82 orthopedic clinics across Germany. In total, 209 adults with CBP and diagnosed depression (SCID interview) were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 104) or treatment-as-usual (n = 105). Cross-lagged mediation models were estimated to investigate longitudinal mediation effects of putative mediators with depression symptom severity (PHQ-9) as primary outcome at post-treatment. RESULTS Longitudinal mediation effects were observed for pain self-efficacy (ß = -0.094, 95%-CI [-0.174, -0.014], p = 0.021) and pain-related disability (ß = -0.068, 95%-CI [-0.130, -0.001], p = 0.047). Furthermore, the hypothesized direction of the mediation effects was supported, reversed causation did not occur. Pain intensity did not reveal a mediation effect. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest a relevant role of pain self-efficacy and pain-related disability as change processes in the treatment of depression for patients with CBP in routine care. However, further research is needed to disclose potential reciprocal relationships of mediators, and to extend and specify our knowledge of the mechanisms of change in digital CBT for depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne G Lutsch
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Germany
| | - Harald Baumeister
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Germany
| | - Sarah Paganini
- Department of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sports and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lasse B Sander
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Yannik Terhorst
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Germany
| | - Matthias Domhardt
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Peterson G, Peolsson A. Efficacy of Neck-Specific Exercise With Internet Support Versus Neck-Specific Exercise at a Physiotherapy Clinic in Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e43888. [PMID: 37338972 PMCID: PMC10337460 DOI: 10.2196/43888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neck-specific exercises (NSE) supervised by a physiotherapist twice a week for 12 weeks have shown good results in chronic whiplash-associated disorders (WADs), but the effect of exercise delivered via the internet is unknown. OBJECTIVE This study examined whether NSE with internet support (NSEIT) and 4 physiotherapy sessions for 12 weeks were noninferior to the same exercises supervised by a physiotherapist twice a week for 12 weeks (NSE). METHODS In this multicenter randomized controlled noninferiority trial with masked assessors, we recruited adults aged 18-63 years with chronic WAD grade II (ie, neck pain and clinical musculoskeletal signs) or III (ie, grade II plus neurological signs). Outcomes were measured at baseline and at 3- and 15-month follow-ups. The primary outcome was change in neck-related disability, measured with the Neck Disability Index (NDI; 0%-100%), with higher percentages indicating greater disability. Secondary outcomes were neck and arm pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), physical function (Whiplash Disability Questionnaire [WDQ] and Patient-Specific Functional Scale [PSFS]), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS), and self-rated recovery (Global Rating Scale [GRS]). The analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis and with the per-protocol approach as sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Between April 6, 2017, and September 15, 2020, 140 participants were randomly assigned to the NSEIT group (n=70) or the NSE group (n=70); 63 (90%) and 64 (91%), respectively, were followed up at 3 months, and 56 (80%) and 58 (83%), respectively, at 15 months. NSEIT demonstrated noninferiority to NSE in the primary outcome NDI, as the 1-sided 95% CI of the mean difference in change did not cross the specified noninferiority margin (7 percentage units). There were no significant between-group differences in change in NDI at the 3- or 15-month follow-up, with a mean difference of 1.4 (95% CI -2.5 to 5.3) and 0.9 (95% CI -3.6 to 5.3), respectively. In both groups, the NDI significantly decreased over time (NSEIT: mean change -10.1, 95% CI -13.7 to -6.5, effect size=1.33; NSE: mean change -9.3, 95% CI -12.8 to -5.7, effect size=1.19 at 15 months; P<.001). NSEIT was noninferior to NSE for most of the secondary outcomes except for neck pain intensity and EQ VAS, but post hoc analyses showed no differences between the groups. Similar results were seen in the per-protocol population. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS NSEIT was noninferior to NSE in chronic WAD and required less physiotherapist time. NSEIT could be used as a treatment for patients with chronic WAD grades II and III. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03022812; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03022812.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunnel Peterson
- Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Anneli Peolsson
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine Center, Unit of Clinical Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Garland EL, Gullapalli BT, Prince KC, Hanley AW, Sanyer M, Tuomenoksa M, Rahman T. Zoom-Based Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement Plus Just-in-Time Mindfulness Practice Triggered by Wearable Sensors for Opioid Craving and Chronic Pain. Mindfulness (N Y) 2023; 14:1-17. [PMID: 37362184 PMCID: PMC10205566 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-023-02137-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Objective The opioid crisis in the USA remains severe during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has reduced access to evidence-based interventions. This Stage 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessed the preliminary efficacy of Zoom-based Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) plus Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention (JITAI) prompts to practice mindfulness triggered by wearable sensors (MORE + JITAI). Method Opioid-treated chronic pain patients (n = 63) were randomized to MORE + JITAI or a Zoom-based supportive group (SG) psychotherapy control. Participants completed ecological momentary assessments (EMA) of craving and pain (co-primary outcomes), as well as positive affect, and stress at one random probe per day for 90 days. EMA probes were also triggered when a wearable sensor detected the presence of physiological stress, as indicated by changes in heart rate variability (HRV), at which time participants in MORE + JITAI were prompted by an app to engage in audio-guided mindfulness practice. Results EMA showed significantly greater reductions in craving, pain, and stress, and increased positive affect over time for participants in MORE + JITAI than for participants in SG. JITAI-initiated mindfulness practice was associated with significant improvements in these variables, as well as increases in HRV. Machine learning predicted JITAI-initiated mindfulness practice effectiveness with reasonable sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions In this pilot trial, MORE + JITAI demonstrated preliminary efficacy for reducing opioid craving and pain, two factors implicated in opioid misuse. MORE + JITAI is a promising intervention that warrants investigation in a fully powered RCT. Preregistration This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04567043).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric L. Garland
- University of Utah, 395 South, 1500 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
- Salt Lake VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, USA
| | | | - Kort C. Prince
- University of Utah, 395 South, 1500 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
| | - Adam W. Hanley
- University of Utah, 395 South, 1500 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chew MT, Chan C, Kobayashi S, Cheng HY, Wong TM, Nicholson LL. Online pain management programs for chronic, widespread musculoskeletal conditions: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Pain Pract 2023. [PMID: 37051894 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
Face-to-face pain management programs demonstrate positive clinical outcomes in the chronic pain population by improving pain intensity and attitudes, depression, and functional disability scores. The effects of this modality carried out online is less known, particularly in subgroups of chronic pain. This systematic review assessed the effects of online pain management programs in chronic, widespread musculoskeletal conditions on pain measurements (intensity, interference, coping, and catastrophizing), health-related quality of life, depression, and anxiety scores immediately post-intervention. Five electronic databases (Embase, Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, and PEDro) were searched with 3546 studies identified. Eighteen randomized controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Included studies had moderate methodological quality (using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool) but high risk of bias (using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2)). There were significant improvements in pain intensity (11 studies, 1397 participants, SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.10, p = 0.004), health-related quality of life (eight studies, 1054 participants, SMD 0.41, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.75, p = 0.02), and depression (nine studies, 1283 participants, SMD -0.32, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.08, p = 0.008). However, effect sizes were small and did not meet their respective measure's minimal clinically important change score. Guided interventions (regular interaction with an instructor) appeared to be superior to self-completed interventions. Future research should standardize outcome measures for assessing pain, use active control groups, and analyze other outcome measures such as cost and long-term effects. This study was registered with Prospero on August 15, 2021 (CRD42021267565).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Tze Chew
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cliffton Chan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Kobayashi
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hoi Yan Cheng
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Tsz Ming Wong
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Leslie L Nicholson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fritsch CG, Abdel-Shaheed C, Mohammed R, Ferreira PH, McLachlan AJ, Ferreira ML. A qualitative assessment of a text message intervention for people with low back pain. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2023; 64:102739. [PMID: 36924579 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Text messages represent a simple and scalable strategy to provide self-management to people with low back pain (LBP), yet their usefulness is unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess the usefulness, delivery format, behaviour-change ability and potential for the TEXT4myBACK intervention to be scaled-up. DESIGN Qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial. METHODS 64 participants of the TEXT4myBACK trial randomised to the intervention arm were invited to participate in online sessions. Participants provided feedback about the text messages received. Online sessions were conducted by two researchers until thematic saturation was achieved. Information was analysed based on framework analysis and thematic data-driven coding. RESULTS Of the 64 invited, 10 people participated in the sessions and thematic saturation was reached. The following themes were identified: intervention's format, barriers and facilitators for behaviour-change, effectiveness, and implementation into healthcare. The messages were considered useful and their format was well-accepted, whilst some suggested a longer duration. The messages were considered simple to read and understand yet further information about LBP and exercise would be appreciated. Some believed the intervention improved their LBP and others believed its effectiveness would depend on receiver's characteristics. Participants felt the messages helped them to increase physical activity. Provision of information, reminders, and self-awareness were some behaviour-change facilitators. Participants said the intervention could be provided by healthcare professionals either for free or through a small fee. CONCLUSIONS The TEXT4myBACK intervention was useful and well-accepted. It provided reminders and supported increases in physical activity. Participants provided suggestions for the intervention to be scaled-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina G Fritsch
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Christina Abdel-Shaheed
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Riyaas Mohammed
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paulo H Ferreira
- The University of Sydney, Musculoskeletal Health Research Group, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew J McLachlan
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Manuela L Ferreira
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jeong YS, Kwon DR, Kim SW, Özçakar L, Kwak SG. A Novel App for Assessing the Caregivers' Physical Activity: A Pilot/Feasibility Study. Clin Nurs Res 2023; 32:463-468. [PMID: 36575868 PMCID: PMC9976636 DOI: 10.1177/10547738221148148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
This study sought to determine the feasibility and clinical value of using a novel mobile application (app) to record the muscle/physical activity (PA) of caregivers. In all, 23 caregivers were enrolled and they were trained to use the app and a wearable device that automatically recorded their care activities and PA/burden. Data were collected for 42 days. Muscle activity was measured for 3 weeks during maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and PA. Approximately 80% of the caregivers agreed that they conveniently used the wearable device through the mobile app. The most active %MVIC was noted for the back muscles during feeding assistance. As regard subjective pain evaluation, back pain was the most prevalent and pain level in the left knee was the highest. Incorporating mobile apps with wearable devices to record every activity of the caregivers may be feasible and can provide valuable clinical data for optimizing their pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoo Seok Jeong
- BioHealth Convergence center, Daegu Technopark, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Rak Kwon
- Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Republic of Korea,Dong Rak Kwon, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, 33 Duryugongwon-ro 17-gil, Nam-Gu, Daegu 705-718, South Korea. Emails: ;
| | - Sang Won Kim
- BioHealth Convergence center, Daegu Technopark, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Sang Gyu Kwak
- Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Longtin C, Coutu MF, Gaudreault N, Kairy D, Nastasiag I, Léonard G. Self-management programs to ensure sustainable return to work following long-term sick leave due to low back pain: A sequential qualitative study. Work 2023:WOR220202. [PMID: 36641727 DOI: 10.3233/wor-220202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition frequently leading to disability. Research suggests that self-management (SM) programs for chronic LBP should include strategies to promote sustainable return to work. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to 1) validate and prioritize the essential content elements of a SM program in light of the needs of workplace representatives, and 2) identify the main facilitators and barriers to be considered when developing and implementing a SM program delivered via information and communication technologies (ICT). METHODS A sequential qualitative design was used. We recruited workplace representatives and potential future users of SM programs (union representatives and employers) and collected data through focus groups and nominal group techniques to validate the relevance of the different elements included into 3 broad categories (Understand, Learn, Apply), as well as to highlight potential barriers and facilitators. RESULTS Eleven participants took part in this study. The content elements proposed in the literature for SM programs were found to align with potential future users' needs, with participants ranking the same elements as those proposed in the scientific literature as the most important across all categories. Although some barriers were identified, workplace representatives believed that ICT offer an appropriate strategy for delivering individualized SM programs to injured workers who have returned to work. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that the elements identified in the literature as essential components of SM programs designed to ensure a sustainable return to work for people with LBP are in line with the needs of future users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
- School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC,Canada.,Clinical Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC,Canada
| | - Christian Longtin
- School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC,Canada
| | - Marie-France Coutu
- CAPRIT, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC,Canada.,School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC,Canada
| | - Nathaly Gaudreault
- School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC,Canada.,Clinical Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC,Canada
| | - Dahlia Kairy
- School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC,Canada.,Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation, Montréal, QC,Canada
| | | | - Guillaume Léonard
- School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC,Canada.,Research Centre on Aging, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC,Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mavragani A, Röttele N, van der Keylen P, Schöpf-Lazzarino AC, Klimmek M, Körner M, Schnitzius K, Voigt-Radloff S, Maun A, Sofroniou M, Farin-Glattacker E. The Acceptance, Usability, and Utility of a Web Portal for Back Pain as Recommended by Primary Care Physicians: Qualitative Interview Study With Patients. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e38748. [PMID: 36580365 PMCID: PMC9837709 DOI: 10.2196/38748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An ever-increasing number of patients seek health information via the internet. However, there is an overabundance of differing, often low-quality information available, while a lack of health literacy makes it difficult for patients to understand and assess the quality and trustworthiness of the information at hand. The web portal tala-med was thus conceived as an evidence-based, up-to-date, and trustworthy information resource for lower back pain (LBP), which could be used by primary care physicians (PCPs) and patients during and following consultations for LBP. The current evidence demonstrates that patients with LBP could benefit from web portals. However, the use of such portals by patients remains low, thus limiting their effectiveness. Therefore, it is important to explore the factors that promote or hinder the use of web portals and investigate how patients perceive their usability and utility. OBJECTIVE In this study, we investigated the acceptance, usability, and utility of the web portal tala-med from the patient perspective. METHODS This qualitative study was based on telephone interviews with patients who had access to the web portal tala-med from their PCP. We used a semistructured interview guide that consisted of questions about the consultation in which patients were introduced to tala-med, in addition to questions regarding patient perceptions, experiences, and utilization of tala-med. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed through framework analysis. RESULTS A total of 32 half-hour interviews were conducted with 16 female and 16 male patients with LBP. We identified 5 themes of interest: the use of tala-med by PCPs during the consultation, the use of tala-med by patients, its usability, added values derived from its use, and the resultant effects of using tala-med. PCPs used tala-med as an additional information resource for their patients and recommended the exercises. The patients appreciated these exercises and were willing to use tala-med at home. We also identified factors that promoted or hindered the use of tala-med by patients. Most patients rated tala-med positively and considered it a clear, comprehensible, trustworthy, and practical resource. In particular, the trustworthiness of tala-med was seen as an advantage over other information resources. The possibilities offered by tala-med to recap and reflect on the contents of consultations in a time-flexible and independent manner was perceived as an added value to the PCP consultation. CONCLUSIONS Tala-med was well accepted by patients and appeared to be well suited to being used as an add-on to PCP consultations. Patient perception also supports its usability and utility. Tala-med may therefore enrich consultations and assist patients who would otherwise be unable to find good-quality web-based health information on LBP. In addition, our findings support the future development of digital health platforms and their successful use as a supplement to PCP consultations. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.1186/s12875-019-0925-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicole Röttele
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Piet van der Keylen
- Institute of General Practice, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andrea Christina Schöpf-Lazzarino
- Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Miriam Klimmek
- Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mirjam Körner
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kathrin Schnitzius
- Institute of General Practice, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Voigt-Radloff
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Andy Maun
- Institute of General Practice / Family Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mario Sofroniou
- Institute of General Practice / Family Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Erik Farin-Glattacker
- Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lara-Palomo IC, Gil-Martínez E, Ramírez-García JD, Capel-Alcaraz AM, García-López H, Castro-Sánchez AM, Antequera-Soler E. Efficacy of e-Health Interventions in Patients with Chronic Low-Back Pain: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Telemed J E Health 2022; 28:1734-1752. [PMID: 35532971 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Low-back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Around 75-84% of the world's population will experience LBP at some point, establishing it as a major global health problem. e-Health is the remote delivery of therapeutic services, clinical information, and medical care, and may prove a very useful approach to tackle this pathology. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of e-health-based interventions in improving the symptoms of chronic LBP. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and PEDro until January 2022 through the assessment of methodological quality of systematic reviews (AMSTAR). Studies were included in which e-health interventions were used as experimental treatment compared to physical therapy to determine changes in back-specific functional status and pain in patients with chronic LBP. Two reviewers examined the sources individually, calculated the risk of bias, and extracted the data (PROSPERO number CRD42022306130). The effect size was calculated using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and its confidence interval (95% CI). Results: A total of 9 randomized controlled trials with 3,180 participants were included. The results of the findings showed an effect of e-health compared to other physical therapy on short-term (SMD = -0.59, 95% CI: -1.77 to 0.59) and intermediate short-term (SMD = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.91 to 0.11) pain intensity and back-specific functional status in the short term (SMD = -0.20, 95% CI: -0.81 to 0.41) and intermediate short term (SMD = -0.30, 95% CI: -0.74 to 0.14). The effect of e-health compared to minimal intervention on short-term intermediate pain intensity (SMD = -0.64, 95% CI: -1.72 to 0.45) and short-term intermediate back-specific functional status (SMD = -0.39, 95% CI: -0.87 to 0.09). Conclusions: e-Health interventions based on self-maintenance and education are as effective on pain and back-specific functional status as other face-to-face or home-based interventions in patients with chronic LBP, with moderate scientific evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Esther Gil-Martínez
- Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Almería University, Almería, Spain
| | | | | | - Héctor García-López
- Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Almería University, Almería, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ziadni MS, Sturgeon JA, Lumley MA. "Pain, Stress, and Emotions": Uncontrolled trial of a single-session, telehealth, emotional awareness and expression therapy class for patients with chronic pain. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH (LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 3:1028561. [PMID: 36466215 PMCID: PMC9715975 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2022.1028561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Trauma- and emotion-focused chronic pain interventions, particularly Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy (EAET), show much promise for reducing pain and improving functioning. We developed a novel, single-session, telehealth-delivered EAET class ("Pain, Stress, and Emotions"; PSE) and tested it on adults with chronic pain of mixed etiology. Methods After an initial developmental phase, we conducted an uncontrolled trial, providing PSE to 74 individuals with chronic pain (63.5% female; 64.9% White; 60.8% with pain duration >5 years) in four class administrations. Participants completed self-report measures (primary outcomes: pain intensity and pain interference) at baseline and multiple follow-ups to 12 weeks. Linear mixed-models examined changes over time, and effect sizes were calculated on change from baseline to 4-week (primary endpoint) and 12-week follow-ups. The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05014126). Results Participants reported high satisfaction with the PSE class. Pain intensity showed a significant, medium reduction across time (p < .001; d = 0.60 at 4 weeks); one-quarter of participants had clinically meaningful pain reduction (≥30%). Pain interference had a large reduction (p < .001; d = 0.74). There were significant but smaller improvements in most secondary outcomes (ds = 0.15 to 0.55; ps < .01). Effects were generally maintained or increased at 12-week follow-up. Higher education and baseline ambivalence over emotional expression predicted greater pain reductions. Conclusions People taking this EAET class had reduced pain severity and interference and improvements in other pain-related outcomes. The single-session, telehealth class holds promise as an easily delivered, efficient, and potentially impactful intervention for some patients with chronic pain, although controlled trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa S. Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States,Correspondence: Maisa Ziadni
| | - John A. Sturgeon
- Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Mark A. Lumley
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Moradi Z, Tavafian SS, Kazemi SS. Educational intervention program based on health belief model and neck pain prevention behaviors in school teachers in Tehran. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1501. [PMID: 35931964 PMCID: PMC9356465 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13873-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prevention of musculoskeletal disorders as one of the most common occupational health problems among the working population in both developed and developing countries is an important necessity and priority. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention program based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) to increase awareness, perceived sensitivity, perceived severity, perceived benefits, and self-efficacy in adopting neck health-promoting behaviors in school teachers. Methods The present study was a quasi-experimental of the randomized clinical trial that was conducted for 6 months (December 2020 to July 2021). Participants were 146 junior high school teachers were selected from 26 schools through random sampling and divided into two groups of intervention and control. The data collection instrument was the self-design questionnaire and was completed in three points of time (before, immediately, and 3 months after the intervention). The data were analyzed by software version 24 SPSS. Results The results showed that awareness, perceived sensitivity, perceived severity, perceived benefits and barriers, and self-efficacy in adopting neck health-promoting behaviors in the intervention group increased in two points of time (immediately after the intervention and 3 months of follow-up) (P < 0.05). Conclusion Designing and implementing an educational intervention based on HBM could affect in adopting neck health-promoting behaviors among teachers. Trial registration IRCT20210301050542N1, 16/03/2021 first registration has been approved in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials at (16/03/2021).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zohreh Moradi
- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sedigheh Sadat Tavafian
- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Seyedeh Somayeh Kazemi
- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Public Health, School of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Costa F, Janela D, Molinos M, Moulder RG, Lains J, Bento V, Scheer J, Yanamadala V, Correia FD, Cohen SP. Digital Rehabilitation for Acute Low Back Pain: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study. J Pain Res 2022; 15:1873-1887. [PMID: 35813029 PMCID: PMC9261956 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s369926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Low back pain (LBP) has a lifetime prevalence of 70–80%. Access to timely and personalized, evidence-based care is key to prevent chronic progression. Digital solutions may ease accessibility to treatment while reducing healthcare-related costs. Purpose We aim to report the results of a fully remote digital care program (DCP) for acute LBP. Patients and Methods This was an interventional, single-arm, cohort study of patients with acute LBP who received a DCP. Primary outcome was the mean change in disability (Oswestry Disability Index – ODI) after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included change in pain (NPRS), analgesic consumption, surgery likelihood, depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), fear-avoidance beliefs (FABQ-PA), work productivity (WPAI) and engagement. Results A total of 406 patients were enrolled in the program and of those, 332 (81.8%) completed the intervention. A significant disability reduction of 55.1% (14.93, 95% CI 13.95; 15.91) was observed, corresponding to a 76.1% responder rate (30% cut-off). Disability reduction was accompanied by significant improvements in pain (61.0%), depression (55.4%), anxiety (59.5%), productivity (65.6%), fear-avoidance beliefs (46.3%), intent to pursue surgery (59.1%), and analgesic consumption (from 35.7% at baseline to 10.8% at program end). DCP-related patient satisfaction score was 8.7/10.0 (SD 1.4). Conclusion This study demonstrated the utility of a multimodal DCP for patients with acute LBP. Very high adherence rates and patient satisfaction were observed, alongside significant reductions in all assessed outcomes, consistent with the growing body of evidence supporting the management of acute LBP with DCPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabíola Costa
- SWORD Health, Inc, Clinical Research, Draper, UT, USA
| | - Dora Janela
- SWORD Health, Inc, Clinical Research, Draper, UT, USA
| | - Maria Molinos
- SWORD Health, Inc, Clinical Research, Draper, UT, USA
| | - Robert G Moulder
- Institute for Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Jorge Lains
- Rovisco Pais Medical and Rehabilitation Centre, Tocha, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | - Justin Scheer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Vijay Yanamadala
- SWORD Health, Inc, Clinical Research, Draper, UT, USA
- Department of Surgery, Quinnipiac University Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, Hamden, CT, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hartford Healthcare Medical Group, Westport, CT, USA
| | - Fernando Dias Correia
- SWORD Health, Inc, Clinical Research, Draper, UT, USA
- Neurology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Correspondence: Fernando Dias Correia, 65 E Wadsworth Park Dr Ste 230, Draper, UT, 84020, USA, Tel +1 385-308-8034, Fax +1 801-206-3433, Email
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Departments of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurology, and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shaygan M, Jaberi A, Firozian R, Yazdani Z. Comparing the effects of multimedia and face-to-face pain management education on pain intensity and pain catastrophizing among patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0269785. [PMID: 35709207 PMCID: PMC9202919 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Previous studies into Low Back Pain (LBP) assessed the effects of physical interventions or face-to-face (FTF) education mostly in western cultures. The present study aimed to compare the effects of multimedia and FTF pain management education (PME) on pain intensity and pain catastrophizing among participants with chronic LBP. Methods This double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on ninety participants with chronic LBP randomly allocated to either multimedia, FTF, or control groups. Participants in the multimedia group received PME through watching seven educational CDs at home and their counterparts in the FTF group received the same educations in seven weekly FTF educational sessions. Pain intensity (using a numerical rating scale) and pain catastrophizing (using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale) were assessed before, immediately after, and one month after the study intervention. The effects of the interventions were assessed using the repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Effect size and minimal detectable change (MDC) were reported for both variables. The regression model used in the present study was Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). Findings The findings of MANOVA showed the significant effects of time on pain intensity and pain catastrophizing (P<0.001). The Tukey’s test showed that before and immediately after the intervention, the mean scores of pain intensity and pain catastrophizing in the FTF and PME groups were significantly different from the control group (P<0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). MDC did not show clinically significant changes in the mean score of pain intensity and GEE revealed significant difference among the groups. Conclusion The findings suggested that multimedia PME is as effective as FTF education in reducing pain intensity and pain catastrophizing among participants with LBP. Future studies into the effects of education on LBP are recommended to consider longitudinal designs, a reliable cutoff score for pain catastrophizing, and participants’ physical ability. IRCT registration code IRCT20180313039074N1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Shaygan
- Community Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Azita Jaberi
- Community Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
- * E-mail:
| | - Roghayyeh Firozian
- Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of medical sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Zahra Yazdani
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Turesson C, Liedberg G, Vixner L, Lofgren M, Björk M. Evidence-based digital support during 1 year after an Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programme for persons with chronic musculoskeletal pain to facilitate a sustainable return to work: a study protocol for a registry-based multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060452. [PMID: 35470201 PMCID: PMC9039404 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMSP) severely affects the individual's quality of life, functioning and ability to work, and comes with significant societal costs for sick leave and productivity loss. After rehabilitation, patients with CMSP often experience lack of support when responsibility for the return-to-work process is taken over by the employer. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of a digital support (Sustainable WorkEr digital support for Persons with chronic Pain and their Employers (SWEPPE)) for promoting a sustainable return-to-work for persons with CMSP and to facilitate the employers' supportive role and responsibilities in the process. METHODS AND ANALYSIS In this registry-based multicentre randomised controlled trial, 360 patients with CMSP will be randomised to either receive the smartphone application SWEPPE (n=180) or to a control group (n=180). The intervention group will use SWEPPE for 1 year and the control group will not receive any intervention for return to work (RTW). Participants will be recruited from approximately 10 specialist and primary care level units connected to the Swedish National Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation providing Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programmes (IPRP) for CMSP. Eligibility criteria are age 18-65 years and a need for support in RTW or continued support at work for creating a sustainable work situation. Baseline data will be collected when the participants have completed the IPRP. Final assessment will be performed after 12 months. The primary outcome will be a number of days with sickness cash benefit. Secondary outcomes and explanatory variables including important domains affected by CMSP such as health-related quality of life, functioning and work ability will be collected. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Swedish Ethics Review Board approved the study (Dnr 2020-01593, Dnr 2021-01854). The study findings will be disseminated through publication, national and international conferences, and meetings to be available for patients, healthcare providers or stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05058547.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Turesson
- Department of Health Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden
| | - Gunilla Liedberg
- Department of Health Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden
| | - Linda Vixner
- School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
| | - Monika Lofgren
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mathilda Björk
- Department of Health Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bernstein MJ. Outcomes of a digitally delivered exercise and education treatment program for low back pain after three months (Preprint). JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2022; 9:e38084. [PMID: 357276 PMCID: PMC9257621 DOI: 10.2196/38084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
21
|
Turesson C, Liedberg G, Björk M. Development of a Digital Support Application With Evidence-Based Content for Sustainable Return to Work for Persons With Chronic Pain and Their Employers: User-Centered Agile Design Approach. JMIR Hum Factors 2022; 9:e33571. [PMID: 35285814 PMCID: PMC8961348 DOI: 10.2196/33571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persons with chronic pain experience a lack of support after completing rehabilitation and the responsibility for the return-to-work (RTW) process is taken over by the employer. In addition, employers describe not knowing how to support their employees. Smartphone apps have been increasingly used for self-management, but there is a lack of available eHealth apps with evidence-based content providing digital support for persons with chronic pain and their employers when they return to work. OBJECTIVE This study aims to describe the development of a digital support application with evidence-based content that includes a biopsychosocial perspective on chronic pain for sustainable RTW for persons with chronic pain and their employers (SWEPPE [Sustainable Worker Digital Support for Persons With Chronic Pain and Their Employers]). METHODS A user-centered agile design approach was applied. The multidisciplinary project team consisted of health care researchers, a user representative, and a software team. A total of 2 reference groups of 7 persons with chronic pain and 4 employers participated in the development process and usability testing. Mixed methods were used for data collection. The design was revised using feedback from the reference groups. The content of SWEPPE was developed based on existing evidence and input from the reference groups. RESULTS The reference groups identified the following as important characteristics to include in SWEPPE: keeping users motivated, tracking health status and work situation, and following progress. SWEPPE was developed as a smartphone app for the persons with chronic pain and as a web application for their employers. SWEPPE consists of six modules: the action plan, daily self-rating, self-monitoring graphs, the coach, the library, and shared information with the employer. The employers found the following functions in SWEPPE to be the most useful: employees' goals related to RTW, barriers to RTW, support wanted from the employer, and the ability to follow employees' progress. The persons with chronic pain found the following functions in SWEPPE to be the most useful: setting a goal related to RTW, identifying barriers and strategies, and self-monitoring. Usability testing revealed that SWEPPE was safe, useful (ie, provided relevant information), logical, and easy to use with an appealing interface. CONCLUSIONS This study reports the development of a digital support application for persons with chronic pain and their employers. SWEPPE fulfilled the need of support after an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program with useful functions such as setting a goal related to RTW, identification of barriers and strategies for RTW, self-monitoring, and sharing information between the employee and the employer. The user-centered agile design approach contributed to creating SWEPPE as a relevant and easy-to-use eHealth intervention. Further studies are needed to examine the effectiveness of SWEPPE in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Turesson
- Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden
| | - Gunilla Liedberg
- Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden
| | - Mathilda Björk
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Does m-health-based exercise (guidance plus education) improve efficacy in patients with chronic low-back pain? A preliminary report on the intervention's significance. Trials 2022; 23:190. [PMID: 35241140 PMCID: PMC8892411 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06116-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The utilization of mobile health (m-health) has rapidly expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic, and there is still a lack of relevant clinical data pertaining to chronic low-back pain (CLBP) management. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of m-health-based exercise (via guidance plus education) versus exercise (via guidance) during CLBP management. Methods Participants (n = 40) were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The intervention group received m-health-based exercise (via guidance plus education), whereas the control group received m-health-based exercise (via guidance). The exercise prescription video and educational content were sent to participants by the application (app), Ding Talk. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to test the baseline’s intervention effects, 6-week follow-up, and 18-week follow-up. We selected function (Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire) and pain intensity (current, mean, and most severe Numeric Rating Scale in the last 2 weeks) as the primary outcomes, changes of negative emotion (depression, anxious), and quality of life as the secondary outcomes. Results Time’s significant effect was found in pain, function, and health-related quality of life in both groups, but time did not show significant interaction effects. Participants were able to use m-based education with their anxiety and depression after treatment, but the relief only lasted until week 6. No differences were found on the aspect of mental health-related quality of life. Conclusion Preliminary findings suggest that m-health-based exercise (via guidance) may be a convenient and effective method to treat CLBP. However, additional health education didn't help more. More rigorous controlled trials are needed to improve the therapeutic effect in future studies. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trials Registry Number ChiCTR2000041459. Registered on December 26, 2020.
Collapse
|
23
|
Deegan O, Fullen BM, Casey MB, Segurado R, Hearty C, Doody CM. Combined online interactive mindfulness and exercise programme (MOVE-Online) compared with a self-management guide for adults with chronic pain: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e058265. [PMID: 35140163 PMCID: PMC8830222 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Online pain management programmes (PMP) have growing evidence as effective interventions for individuals with chronic pain (CP). Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) is a psychological intervention proven to be effective in the management of CP. There is also a large body of evidence for the efficacy of exercise in the management of CP however, there are limited studies combining both these interventions and none to date delivering a combined intervention in the form of an online PMP. This study aims to explore the acceptability and feasibility of delivering a combined MBSR and exercise online PMP for adults with CP, and will examine the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of a combined MBSR and exercise online programme compared with an online self-management guide. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A parallel-group, feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted among participants in Ireland, which will include an embedded qualitative study. Seventy-five participants will complete an online consent form and be individually randomised to one of two groups. Group A will participate in live online MBSR and supervised exercise sessions (2 hours MBSR, 1 hour exercise) once a week for 8 weeks. Group B will receive access to an 8-week online self-management guide, released biweekly and containing eight self-directed modules. Analyses of the feasibility study will be descriptive and will address the outcomes relating to the feasibility and acceptability of the interventions and procedures of the study including recruitment and eligibility, data collection methods, intervention adherence, engagement and attrition rates, intervention acceptability and participants' subjective perceptions of the programmes. Comparisons of clinical treatment effects, using validated patient-reported outcome measures will be explored descriptively to consider the viability of investigating a combined online MBSR and exercise intervention in a future fully powered RCT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study was approved by the Mater Misericordiae University Hospital Institutional Review Board (1/378/2124) and the University College Dublin Human Research Ethics Committee (LS-20-76-Deegan-Doody). Informed consent will be obtained from each participant prior to randomisation. The results of this feasibility study will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04899622.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orla Deegan
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brona M Fullen
- School of Public Health Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maire-Brid Casey
- School of Public Health Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ricardo Segurado
- CSTAR, School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Conor Hearty
- Department of Pain Medicine, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Catherine M Doody
- School of Public Health Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gardner T, Schultz R, Haskelberg H, Newby JM, Wheatley J, Millard M, Faux SG, Shiner CT. The Effect of Adjunct Telephone Support on Adherence and Outcomes of the Reboot Online Pain Management Program: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e30880. [PMID: 35113021 PMCID: PMC8855305 DOI: 10.2196/30880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Internet-based treatment programs present a solution for providing access to pain management for those unable to access clinic-based multidisciplinary pain programs. Attrition from internet interventions is a common issue. Clinician-supported guidance can be an important feature in web-based interventions; however, the optimal level of therapist guidance and expertise required to improve adherence remains unclear. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate whether augmenting the existing Reboot Online program with telephone support by a clinician improves program adherence and effectiveness compared with the web-based program alone. Methods A 2-armed, CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials)–compliant, registered randomized controlled trial with one-to-one group allocation was conducted. It compared a web-based multidisciplinary pain management program, Reboot Online, combined with telephone support (n=44) with Reboot Online alone (n=45) as the control group. Participants were recruited through web-based social media and the This Way Up service provider network. The primary outcome for this study was adherence to the Reboot Online program. Adherence was quantified through three metrics: completion of the program, the number of participants who enrolled into the program, and the number of participants who commenced the program. Data on adherence were collected automatically through the This Way Up platform. Secondary measures of clinical effectiveness were also collected. Results Reboot Online combined with telephone support had a positive effect on enrollment and commencement of the program compared with Reboot Online without telephone support. Significantly more participants from the Reboot Online plus telephone support group enrolled (41/44, 93%) into the course than those from the control group (35/45, 78%; χ21=4.2; P=.04). Furthermore, more participants from the intervention group commenced the course than those from the control group (40/44, 91% vs 27/45, 60%, respectively; χ21=11.4; P=.001). Of the participants enrolled in the intervention group, 43% (19/44) completed the course, and of those in the control group, 31% (14/45) completed the course. When considering the subgroup of those who commenced the program, there was no significant difference between the proportions of people who completed all 8 lessons in the intervention (19/40, 48%) and control groups (14/27, 52%; χ21=1.3; P=.24). The treatment efficacy on clinical outcome measures did not differ between the intervention and control groups. Conclusions Telephone support improves participants’ registration, program commencement, and engagement in the early phase of the internet intervention; however, it did not seem to have an impact on overall course completion or efficacy. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001076167; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12619001076167
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Gardner
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Hila Haskelberg
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jill M Newby
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane Wheatley
- Department of Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael Millard
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Steven G Faux
- Department of Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christine T Shiner
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Svendsen MJ, Sandal LF, Kjær P, Nicholl BI, Cooper K, Mair F, Hartvigsen J, Stochkendahl MJ, Søgaard K, Mork PJ, Rasmussen C. Using Intervention Mapping to Develop a Decision Support System–Based Smartphone App (selfBACK) to Support Self-management of Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Development and Usability Study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e26555. [PMID: 35072645 PMCID: PMC8822424 DOI: 10.2196/26555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
International guidelines consistently endorse the promotion of self-management for people with low back pain (LBP); however, implementation of these guidelines remains a challenge. Digital health interventions, such as those that can be provided by smartphone apps, have been proposed as a promising mode of supporting self-management in people with chronic conditions, including LBP. However, the evidence base for digital health interventions to support self-management of LBP is weak, and detailed descriptions and documentation of the interventions are lacking. Structured intervention mapping (IM) constitutes a 6-step process that can be used to guide the development of complex interventions.
Objective
The aim of this paper is to describe the IM process for designing and creating an app-based intervention designed to support self-management of nonspecific LBP to reduce pain-related disability.
Methods
The first 5 steps of the IM process were systematically applied. The core processes included literature reviews, brainstorming and group discussions, and the inclusion of stakeholders and representatives from the target population. Over a period of >2 years, the intervention content and the technical features of delivery were created, tested, and revised through user tests, feasibility studies, and a pilot study.
Results
A behavioral outcome was identified as a proxy for reaching the overall program goal, that is, increased use of evidence-based self-management strategies. Physical exercises, education, and physical activity were the main components of the self-management intervention and were designed and produced to be delivered via a smartphone app. All intervention content was theoretically underpinned by the behavior change theory and the normalization process theory.
Conclusions
We describe a detailed example of the application of the IM approach for the development of a theory-driven, complex, and digital intervention designed to support self-management of LBP. This description provides transparency in the developmental process of the intervention and can be a possible blueprint for designing and creating future digital health interventions for self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malene Jagd Svendsen
- The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Louise Fleng Sandal
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Per Kjær
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark
| | - Barbara I Nicholl
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, General Practice & Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Kay Cooper
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Frances Mair
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, General Practice & Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mette Jensen Stochkendahl
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| | - Karen Søgaard
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Paul Jarle Mork
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Charlotte Rasmussen
- The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kelly M, Fullen B, Martin D, McMahon S, McVeigh JG. eHealth Interventions to Support Self-Management in People With Musculoskeletal Disorders, "eHealth: It's TIME"-A Scoping Review. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6506314. [PMID: 35079826 PMCID: PMC8994513 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE eHealth-mediated interventions have been proposed as one option to support self-management in those with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). This scoping review aimed to chart the evidence regarding eHealth modalities, musculoskeletal diagnosis, and outcomes of eHealth-mediated self-management support interventions in persons with MSDs and identify any gaps within the literature. METHODS Six electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), 7 grey literature sources (eg, OpenGrey), and reference and citation lists of included studies were searched from database inception to July 2020. Published studies of adult participants with a MSD utilizing an eHealth intervention to support self-management were included. Studies were limited to those published in English. Two reviewers independently screened all studies. Data were extracted by 1 reviewer and reviewed by another reviewer. RESULTS After screening 3377 titles and abstracts followed by 176 full texts, 87 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The majority were published in the last 5 years (n = 48; 55%), with almost one-third originating in the United States (n = 28; 32%). The most common eHealth modality type was internet based (n = 22; 35%), with almost one-half (n = 41; 47%) of the included studies involving participants with widespread musculoskeletal symptoms. The most commonly reported outcomes were related to body functions (ie, pain intensity) (n = 67; 45%), closely followed by activities and participation (ie, function) (n = 65; 44%), with environmental factors (ie, health care utilization) the least commonly reported (n = 17; 20%). CONCLUSIONS There is considerable variation within the eHealth-mediated self-management support intervention literature. Research is needed on the role of eHealth-mediated self-management support interventions across a broad range of MSDs to guide clinical practice. IMPACT This scoping review has identified gaps in the literature relating to specific eHealth modalities, musculoskeletal diagnoses, and health care utilization data, which should guide future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Kelly
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland,Department of Physiotherapy, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland,Address all correspondence to Marie Kelly at:
| | - Brona Fullen
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Denis Martin
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom,NIHR Applied Research Collaborative, North East and North Cumbria, United Kingdom
| | - Sinéad McMahon
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Joseph G McVeigh
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Behavioral Health, Telemedicine, and Opportunities for Improving Access. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:919-926. [PMID: 36418847 PMCID: PMC9684808 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01096-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to summarize advances in behavioral treatments for pain and headache disorders, as well as recent innovations in telemedicine for behavioral treatments. RECENT FINDINGS Research for behavioral treatments continues to support their use as part of a multidisciplinary approach to comprehensive management for pain and headache conditions. Behavioral treatments incorporate both behavioral change and cognitive interventions and have been shown to improve outcomes beyond that of medical management alone. The onset of the COVID-19 public health emergency necessitated the rapid uptake of nontraditional modalities for behavioral treatments, particularly telemedicine. Telemedicine has long been considered the answer to several barriers to accessing behavioral treatments, and as a result of COVID-19 significant progress has been made evaluating a variety of telemedicine modalities including synchronous, asynchronous, and mobile health applications. Researchers are encouraged to continue investigating how best to leverage these modalities to improve access to behavioral treatments and to continue evaluating the efficacy of telemedicine compared to traditional in-person care. Comprehensive pain and headache management should include behavioral treatments to address a variety of behavior change and cognitive targets. Policy changes and advances in telemedicine for behavioral treatments provide the opportunity to address historical barriers limiting access.
Collapse
|
28
|
Clarkson P, Stephenson A, Grimmett C, Cook K, Clark C, Muckelt PE, O’Gorman P, Saynor Z, Adams J, Stokes M, McDonough S. Digital tools to support the maintenance of physical activity in people with long-term conditions: A scoping review. Digit Health 2022; 8:20552076221089778. [PMID: 35433017 PMCID: PMC9005829 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221089778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This scoping review aimed to bring together and identify digital tools that support people with one or more long-term conditions to maintain physical activity and describe their components and theoretical underpinnings. Methods Searches were conducted in Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medline, EMBASE, IEEE Xplore, PsycINFO, Scopus, Google Scholar and clinical trial databases, for studies published between 2009 and 2019, across a range of long-term conditions. Screening and data extraction was undertaken by two independent reviewers and the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews guidelines informed the review's conduct and reporting. Results A total of 38 results were identified from 34 studies, with the majority randomised controlled trials or protocols, with cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity the most common long-term conditions. Comorbidities were reported in >50% of studies but did not clearly inform intervention development. Most digital tools were web-browser-based ± wearables/trackers, telerehabilitation tools or gaming devices/components. Mobile device applications and combination short message service/activity trackers/wearables were also identified. Most interventions were supported by a facilitator, often for goal setting/feedback and/or monitoring. Physical activity maintenance outcomes were mostly reported at 9 months or 3 months post-intervention, while theoretical underpinnings were commonly social cognitive theory, the transtheoretical model and the theory of planned behaviour. Conclusions This review mapped the literature on a wide range of digital tools and long-term conditions. It identified the increasing use of digital tools, in combination with human support, to help people with long-term conditions, to maintain physical activity, commonly for under a year post-intervention. Clear gaps were the lack of digital tools for multimorbid long-term conditions, longer-term follow-ups, understanding participant's experiences and informs future questions around effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Clarkson
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, UK
- Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis, Southampton, UK
| | - Aoife Stephenson
- School of Physiotherapy, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Chloe Grimmett
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- National Institute for Health Research, Southampton Biomedical Research Unit, Southampton, UK
| | - Katherine Cook
- Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, School of Health and Care Professions, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK
| | - Carol Clark
- Department of Rehabilitation and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Paul E Muckelt
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis, Southampton, UK
| | - Philip O’Gorman
- School of Physiotherapy, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Zoe Saynor
- Physical Activity, Health and Rehabilitation Thematic Research Group, Faculty of Science and Health, School of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Jo Adams
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, UK
- Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis, Southampton, UK
| | - Maria Stokes
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, UK
- Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis, Southampton, UK
- National Institute for Health Research, Southampton Biomedical Research Unit, Southampton, UK
| | - Suzanne McDonough
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- School of Physiotherapy, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Blake H, Somerset S, Greaves S. The Pain at Work Toolkit for Employees with Chronic or Persistent Pain: A Collaborative-Participatory Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 10:healthcare10010056. [PMID: 35052220 PMCID: PMC8775489 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10010056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Self-management tools for people with chronic or persistent pain tend to focus on symptom reporting, treatment programmes or exercise and do not address barriers to work, facilitators of work ability, or workplace pain self-management strategies. We developed the Pain at Work (PAW) toolkit, an evidence-based digital toolkit to provide advice on how employees can self-manage their pain at work. In a collaborative-participatory design, 4-step Agile methodology (N = 452) was used to co-create the toolkit with healthcare professionals, employers and people with chronic or persistent pain. Step 1: stakeholder consultation event (n = 27) established content and format; Step 2: online survey with employees who have persistent pain (n = 274) showed employees fear disclosing their condition, and commonly report discrimination and lack of line manager support. Step 3: online employer survey (n = 107) showed employers rarely provide self-management materials or education around managing pain at work, occupational health recommendations for reasonable adjustments are not always actioned, and pain-related stigma is common. Step 4: Toolkit development integrated findings and recommendations from Steps 1–3, and iterative expert peer review was conducted (n = 40). The PAW toolkit provides (a) evidence-based guidelines and signposting around work-capacity advice and support; (b) self-management strategies around working with chronic or persistent pain, (c) promotion of healthy lifestyles, and quality of life at work; (d) advice on adjustments to working environments and workplace solutions to facilitate work participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Blake
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2HA, UK; (S.S.); (S.G.)
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Sarah Somerset
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2HA, UK; (S.S.); (S.G.)
| | - Sarah Greaves
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2HA, UK; (S.S.); (S.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Taguchi K, Numata N, Takanashi R, Takemura R, Yoshida T, Kutsuzawa K, Yoshimura K, Nozaki-Taguchi N, Ohtori S, Shimizu E. Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Videoconference-Based Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e30690. [PMID: 34813489 PMCID: PMC8663446 DOI: 10.2196/30690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive behavioral therapy is known to improve the management of chronic pain. However, the components of this therapy are still being investigated and debated. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of an integrated cognitive behavioral therapy program with new components (attention-shift, memory work, video feedback, and image training) delivered via videoconferencing. METHODS This study was unblinded and participants were recruited and assessed face-to-face in the outpatient department. We conducted a randomized controlled trial for chronic pain to compare 16 weekly videoconference-based cognitive behavioral therapy (vCBT) sessions provided by a therapist with treatment as usual (TAU). Thirty patients (age range, 22-75 years) with chronic pain were randomly assigned to either vCBT (n=15) or TAU (n=15). Patients were evaluated at week 1 (baseline), week 8 (midintervention), and week 16 (postintervention). The primary outcome was the change in pain intensity, which was recorded using the numerical rating scale at 16 weeks from the baseline. Secondary outcomes were pain severity and pain interference, which were assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory. Additionally, we evaluated disability, pain catastrophizing cognition, depression, anxiety, quality of life, and cost utility. RESULTS In the eligibility assessment, 30 patients were eventually randomized and enrolled; finally, 15 patients in the vCBT and 14 patients in the TAU group were analyzed. Although no significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of changes in pain intensity by the numerical rating scale scores at week 16 from baseline (P=.36), there was a significant improvement in the comprehensive evaluation of pain by total score of Brief Pain Inventory (-1.43, 95% CI -2.49 to -0.37, df=24; P=.01). Further, significant improvement was seen in pain interference by using the Brief Pain Inventory (-9.42, 95% CI -14.47 to -4.36, df=25; P=.001) and in disability by using the Pain Disability Assessment Scale (-1.95, 95% CI -3.33 to -0.56, df=24; P=.008) compared with TAU. As for the Medical Economic Evaluation, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for 1 year was estimated at 2.9 million yen (about US $25,000) per quality-adjusted life year gained. CONCLUSIONS The findings of our study suggest that integrated cognitive behavioral therapy delivered by videoconferencing in regular medical care may reduce pain interference but not pain intensity. Further, this treatment method may be cost-effective, although this needs to be further verified using a larger sample size. TRIAL REGISTRATION University Hospital Medical Information Network UMIN000031124; https://tinyurl.com/2pr3xszb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayoko Taguchi
- Research Center for Child Mental Development, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Noriko Numata
- Research Center for Child Mental Development, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Rieko Takanashi
- Department of Psychology, Teikyo University, Hachioji, Japan
| | | | - Tokiko Yoshida
- Research Center for Child Mental Development, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kana Kutsuzawa
- Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Eiji Shimizu
- Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tabacof L, Baker TS, Durbin JR, Desai V, Zeng Q, Sahasrabudhe A, Herrera JE, Putrino D. Telehealth Treatment for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Review of the Current State in Mobile Health. PM R 2021; 14:1086-1098. [PMID: 34786870 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Non-specific low back pain (LBP) is an idiopathic musculoskeletal condition that affects 4 out of 5 individuals in their lifetime and is the leading cause of job-related disability in the United States (US). The interest in interactive and dynamic telehealth treatments for LBP continues to grow, and it is important for the medical community to remain up-to-date on the state of the science. LITERATURE SURVEY Relevant studies published from March 2016 until March 2021 were identified through a systematic search of EMBASE, MedLine and Web of Science. The search strategy combined the concepts of back pain, telehealth and mobile applications. METHODOLOGY Titles and abstracts were screened to select full text randomized controlled trials or protocols and methodological quality and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Data were synthesized narratively. SYNTHESIS We included seven concluded randomized controlled trials and two study protocols reporting mobile health (mHealth) solutions for LBP. Six of the seven concluded trials found a significant improvement in self-reported numerical pain rating scale compared to the control group. A single trial compared a mHealth solution to physical therapy, with the majority of studies comparing interventions to "usual care." Substantial heterogeneity in reporting of sample characteristics was found, indicating a lack of standardization through the field. CONCLUSIONS mHealth solutions may positively impact people with LBP. Larger trials should be encouraged and the field should coalesce around a set of baseline variables for collection and reporting. As many interventions involve patient engagement, future trials should aim to further quantify adherence levels and begin to define telehealth 'doses' associated with better outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Tabacof
- Abilities Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Rehabilitation & Human Performance Department, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Turner S Baker
- Sinai BioDesign, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Neoteric Consulting Group
| | - John R Durbin
- Sinai BioDesign, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Joseph E Herrera
- Rehabilitation & Human Performance Department, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Putrino
- Abilities Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Rehabilitation & Human Performance Department, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Baumeister H, Paganini S, Sander LB, Lin J, Schlicker S, Terhorst Y, Moshagen M, Bengel J, Lehr D, Ebert DD. Effectiveness of a Guided Internet- and Mobile-Based Intervention for Patients with Chronic Back Pain and Depression (WARD-BP): A Multicenter, Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS 2021; 90:255-268. [PMID: 33321501 DOI: 10.1159/000511881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is neither strong evidence on effective treatments for patients with chronic back pain (CBP) and depressive disorder nor sufficiently available mental health care offers. OBJECTIVE The aim is to assess the effectiveness of internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMI) as a scalable approach for treating depression in a routine care setting. METHODS This is an observer-masked, multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled trial with a randomization ratio of 1:1.Patients with CBP and diagnosed depressive disorder (mild to moderate severity) were recruited from 82 orthopedic rehabilitation clinics across Germany. The intervention group (IG) received a guided depression IMI tailored to CBP next to treatment-as-usual (TAU; including medication), while the control group (CG) received TAU. The primary outcome was observer-masked clinician-rated Hamilton depression severity (9-week follow-up). The secondary outcomes were: further depression outcomes, pain-related outcomes, health-related quality of life, and work capacity. Biostatistician blinded analyses using regression models were conducted by intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis. RESULTS Between October 2015 and July 2017, we randomly assigned 210 participants (IG, n = 105; CG, n = 105), mostly with only a mild pain intensity but substantial pain disability. No statistically significant difference in depression severity between IG and CG was observed at the 9-week follow-up (β = -0.19, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.05). Explorative secondary depression (4/9) and pain-related (4/6) outcomes were in part significant (p < 0.05). Health-related quality of life was significantly higher in the IG. No differences were found in work capacity. CONCLUSION The results indicate that an IMI for patients with CBP and depression in a routine care setting has limited impact on depression. Benefits in pain and health-related outcomes suggest that an IMI might still be a useful measure to improve routine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Baumeister
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany,
| | - Sarah Paganini
- Department of Sport Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lasse Bosse Sander
- Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jiaxi Lin
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sandra Schlicker
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yannik Terhorst
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Morten Moshagen
- Department of Psychological Research Methods, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Jürgen Bengel
- Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Lehr
- Department of Health Psychology and Applied Biological Psychology, University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - David Daniel Ebert
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Anan T, Kajiki S, Oka H, Fujii T, Kawamata K, Mori K, Matsudaira K. Effects of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Health Program on Workers With Neck/Shoulder Pain/Stiffness and Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021; 9:e27535. [PMID: 34559054 PMCID: PMC8501409 DOI: 10.2196/27535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Musculoskeletal symptoms such as neck and shoulder pain/stiffness and low back pain are common health problems in the working population. They are the leading causes of presenteeism (employees being physically present at work but unable to be fully engaged). Recently, digital interventions have begun to be used to manage health but their effectiveness has not yet been fully verified, and adherence to such programs is always a problem. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the improvements in musculoskeletal symptoms in workers with neck/shoulder stiffness/pain and low back pain after the use of an exercise-based artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted interactive health promotion system that operates through a mobile messaging app (the AI-assisted health program). We expected that this program would support participants’ adherence to exercises. Methods We conducted a two-armed, randomized, controlled, and unblinded trial in workers with either neck/shoulder stiffness/pain or low back pain or both. We recruited participants with these symptoms through email notifications. The intervention group received the AI-assisted health program, in which the chatbot sent messages to users with the exercise instructions at a fixed time every day through the smartphone’s chatting app (LINE) for 12 weeks. The program was fully automated. The control group continued with their usual care routines. We assessed the subjective severity of the neck and shoulder pain/stiffness and low back pain of the participants by using a scoring scale of 1 to 5 for both the intervention group and the control group at baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention by using a web-based form. We used a logistic regression model to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) of the intervention group to achieve to reduce pain scores with those of the control group, and the ORs of the subjective assessment of the improvement of the symptoms compared to the intervention and control groups, which were performed using Stata software (version 16, StataCorp LLC). Results We analyzed 48 participants in the intervention group and 46 participants in the control group. The adherence rate was 92% (44/48) during the intervention. The participants in the intervention group showed significant improvements in the severity of the neck/shoulder pain/stiffness and low back pain compared to those in the control group (OR 6.36, 95% CI 2.57-15.73; P<.001). Based on the subjective assessment of the improvement of the pain/stiffness at 12 weeks, 36 (75%) out of 48 participants in the intervention group and 3 (7%) out of 46 participants in the control group showed improvements (improved, slightly improved) (OR 43.00, 95% CI 11.25-164.28; P<.001). Conclusions This study shows that the short exercises provided by the AI-assisted health program improved both neck/shoulder pain/stiffness and low back pain in 12 weeks. Further studies are needed to identify the elements contributing to the successful outcome of the AI-assisted health program. Trial Registration University hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) 000033894; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000038307.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomomi Anan
- Department of Occupational Health Practice and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.,Cenxus Occupational Physicians' Firm, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigeyuki Kajiki
- Department of Occupational Health Practice and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.,Cenxus Occupational Physicians' Firm, Tokyo, Japan.,Advanced Occupational Health Research and Consulting Inc, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Oka
- Department of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoko Fujii
- Department of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kayo Kawamata
- Department of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Mori
- Department of Occupational Health Practice and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Ko Matsudaira
- Department of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Marcuzzi A, Bach K, Nordstoga AL, Bertheussen GF, Ashikhmin I, Boldermo NØ, Kvarner EN, Nilsen TIL, Marchand GH, Ose SO, Aasdahl L, Kaspersen SL, Bardal EM, Børke JB, Mork PJ, Gismervik S. Individually tailored self-management app-based intervention (selfBACK) versus a self-management web-based intervention (e-Help) or usual care in people with low back and neck pain referred to secondary care: protocol for a multiarm randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e047921. [PMID: 34518253 PMCID: PMC8438956 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) are common and costly conditions. Self-management is a key element in the care of persistent LBP and NP. Artificial intelligence can be used to support and tailor self-management interventions, but their effectiveness needs to be ascertained. The aims of this trial are (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of an individually tailored app-based self-management intervention (selfBACK) adjunct to usual care in people with LBP and/or NP in secondary care compared with usual care only, and (2) to compare the effectiveness of selfBACK with a web-based self-management intervention without individual tailoring (e-Help). METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a randomised, assessor-blind clinical trial with three parallel arms: (1) selfBACK app adjunct to usual care; (2) e-Help website adjunct to usual care and (3) usual care only. Patients referred to St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim (Norway) with LBP and/or NP and accepted for assessment/treatment at the multidisciplinary outpatient clinic for back or neck rehabilitation are invited to the study. Eligible and consenting participants are randomised to one of the three arms with equal allocation ratio. We aim to include 279 participants (93 in each arm). Outcome variables are assessed at baseline (before randomisation) and at 6-week, 3-month and 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome is musculoskeletal health measured by the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire at 3 months. A mixed-methods process evaluation will document patients' and clinicians' experiences with the interventions. A health economic evaluation will estimate the cost-effectiveness of both interventions' adjunct to usual care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial is approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Central Norway (Ref. 2019/64084). The results of the trial will be published in peer-review journals and presentations at national and international conferences relevant to this topic. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04463043.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Marcuzzi
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Kerstin Bach
- Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anne Lovise Nordstoga
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St Olavs Hospital,Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Gro Falkener Bertheussen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St Olavs Hospital,Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ilya Ashikhmin
- Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Nora Østbø Boldermo
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St Olavs Hospital,Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Else-Norun Kvarner
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St Olavs Hospital,Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tom Ivar Lund Nilsen
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Clinic of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, St Olavs Hospital,Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Gunn Hege Marchand
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St Olavs Hospital,Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Solveig Osborg Ose
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St Olavs Hospital,Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Health Services Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Lene Aasdahl
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Unicare Helsefort Rehabilitation Center, Rissa, Norway
| | - Silje Lill Kaspersen
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Health Services Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ellen Marie Bardal
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Janne-Birgitte Børke
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St Olavs Hospital,Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Paul Jarle Mork
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Sigmund Gismervik
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St Olavs Hospital,Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ziadni MS, Gonzalez-Castro L, Anderson S, Krishnamurthy P, Darnall BD. Efficacy of a Single-Session "Empowered Relief" Zoom-Delivered Group Intervention for Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial Conducted During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e29672. [PMID: 34505832 PMCID: PMC8463950 DOI: 10.2196/29672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive behavioral therapy-pain is an evidence-based treatment for chronic pain that can have significant patient burden, including health care cost, travel, multiple sessions, and lack of access in remote areas. OBJECTIVE The study aims to pilot test the efficacy of a single-session videoconference-delivered empowered relief (ER) intervention compared to waitlist control (WLC) conditions among individuals with chronic pain. We hypothesized that ER would be superior to WLC in reducing pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, and other pain-related outcomes at 1-3 months posttreatment. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving a web-based sample of adults (N=104) aged 18-80 years with self-reported chronic pain. Participants were randomized (1:1) to 1 of 2 unblinded study groups: ER (50/104, 48.1%) and WLC (54/104, 51.9%). Participants allocated to ER completed a Zoom-delivered class, and all participants completed follow-up surveys at 2 weeks and 1, 2, and 3 months posttreatment. All the study procedures were performed remotely and electronically. The primary outcome was pain catastrophizing 1-month posttreatment, with pain intensity, pain bothersomeness, and sleep disruption as secondary outcomes. We also report a more rigorous test of the durability of treatment effects at 3 months posttreatment. Data were collected from September 2020 to February 2021 and analyzed using intention-to-treat analysis. The analytic data set included participants (18/101, 17.8% clinic patients; 83/101, 82.1% community) who completed at least one study survey: ER (50/101, 49.5%) and WLC (51/104, 49%). RESULTS Participants (N=101) were 69.3% (70/101) female, with a mean age of 49.76 years (SD 13.90; range 24-78); 32.7% (33/101) had an undergraduate degree and self-reported chronic pain for 3 months. Participants reported high engagement (47/50, 94%), high satisfaction with ER (mean 8.26, SD 1.57; range 0-10), and high satisfaction with the Zoom platform (46/50, 92%). For the between-groups factor, ER was superior to WLC for all primary and secondary outcomes at 3 months posttreatment (highest P<.001), and between-groups Cohen d effect sizes ranged from 0.45 to 0.79, indicating that the superiority was of moderate to substantial clinical importance. At 3 months, clinically meaningful pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) reductions were found for ER but not for WLC (ER: PCS -8.72, 42.25% reduction; WLC: PCS -2.25, 11.13% reduction). ER resulted in significant improvements in pain intensity, sleep disturbance, and clinical improvements in pain bothersomeness. CONCLUSIONS Zoom-delivered ER had high participant satisfaction and very high engagement. Among adults with chronic pain, this single-session, Zoom-delivered, skills-based pain class resulted in clinically significant improvement across a range of pain-related outcomes that was sustained at 3 months. Web-based delivery of ER could allow greater accessibility of home-based pain treatment and could address the inconveniences and barriers faced by patients when attempting to receive in-person care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04546685; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04546685.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Lluvia Gonzalez-Castro
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Steven Anderson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | | | - Beth D Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lim DZ, Newby JM, Gardner T, Haskelberg H, Schultz R, Faux SG, Shiner CT. Evaluating Real-World Adherence and Effectiveness of the "Reboot Online" Program for the Management of Chronic Pain in Routine Care. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 22:1784-1792. [PMID: 33729536 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Chronic pain is a prevalent and disabling condition. Reboot Online was developed as a multidisciplinary and widely accessible online treatment program for chronic pain. It has been shown to be effective in clinical trials, but the effectiveness of this program in routine care settings remains unknown. This study aimed to examine program adherence and effectiveness in a real-world sample of participants completing Reboot Online in the community. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS A retrospective cohort study was conducted using real-world data from participants referred the Reboot Online program by clinicians as part of their routine care, from April 2017 to April 2019. METHODS Routinely collected data on program adherence, participant demography and clinical outcomes were included in the analyses. Measures included the Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire, Brief Pain Inventory, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain-Disability Index, and Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (depression). Logistic regression was used to investigate whether certain factors predict program adherence (completion versus noncompletion), and linear mixed models were used to examine effectiveness. RESULTS In total, 867 participants were included in the analyses, and 583 engaged with at least one Reboot Online lesson. Of these, 42% (n = 247) completed the course in its entirety, with rurality and lower Tampa scores being significant predictors of adherence. Completers demonstrated significant improvements across all outcome measures (effect sizes ranging from 0.22 to 0.51). CONCLUSIONS Reboot Online is an effective treatment for chronic pain in the routine care setting. Adherence was variable (overall 42%), and could be predicted by rurality and less fear of movement at baseline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek Z Lim
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jill M Newby
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), University of New South Wales and St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tania Gardner
- Department of Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hila Haskelberg
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), University of New South Wales and St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Regina Schultz
- Department of Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Steven G Faux
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christine T Shiner
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kesiena O, Ajayi KV, Rene A, Benden M. Sociodemographic and work-related predictors of chronic lower back pain in the United States: the 2018 National Health Interview Survey data. Public Health 2021; 198:30-34. [PMID: 34348193 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to explore the current characteristics of people with chronic lower back (CLB) pain, and the sociodemographic and work-related predictors of this pain. STUDY DESIGN The study design used in the study is a cross-sectional study. METHOD The 2018 National Health Interview Survey data were used. Chi-squared analysis was used to assess the sociodemographic characteristics, and logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors after multiple imputation. RESULTS Of the 72,831 respondents, 25,397 had provided data on CLB pain and were eligible for this study. People with CLB pain were more likely to be obese, white, female, older than 40 years, and did not have a college degree. They were more likely to carry out less than 150 min of moderate aerobic exercise per week. Age was the sociodemographic predictor of CLB pain (P-value <0.001). After imputation and adjusting for covariates, construction and extraction and military-specific occupational groups were associated with an increased risk of CLB pain [odds ratios (OR): 1.32, confidence interval (CI): 1.10-1.59, P-value = 0.004; OR: 2.20, CI: 1.36-3.55, P-value = 0.001]. Working between 41 and 60 h/week significantly also had an increased risk of developing CLB pain (OR: 1.13, CI: 1.01-1.27, P-value 0.043; OR: 1.23, CI: 1.10-1.37, P-value <0.001). CONCLUSION Low socio-economic status, poor physical fitness, work-life imbalance, and the type of occupation contribute to the development of CLB pain. An improvement in preventive measures is needed to address this morbidity. More studies should be carried out to analyze the type of workplace movements that increase the risk of developing CLB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Kesiena
- Department of Internal Medicine, Piedmont Athens Regional Medical Center, Athens, GA, USA; School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
| | - K V Ajayi
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - A Rene
- School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - M Benden
- School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hodges PW, Hall L, Setchell J, French S, Kasza J, Bennell K, Hunter D, Vicenzino B, Crofts S, Dickson C, Ferreira M. Effect of a Consumer-Focused Website for Low Back Pain on Health Literacy, Treatment Choices, and Clinical Outcomes: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e27860. [PMID: 34128822 PMCID: PMC8277358 DOI: 10.2196/27860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The internet is used for information related to health conditions, including low back pain (LBP), but most LBP websites provide inaccurate information. Few studies have investigated the effectiveness of internet resources in changing health literacy or treatment choices. Objective This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the MyBackPain website compared with unguided internet use on health literacy, choice of treatments, and clinical outcomes in people with LBP. Methods This was a pragmatic, web-based, participant- and assessor-blinded randomized trial of individuals with LBP stratified by duration. Participants were randomly allocated to have access to the evidence-based MyBackPain website, which was designed with input from consumers and expert consensus or unguided internet use. The coprimary outcomes were two dimensions of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (dimension 2: “having sufficient information to manage my health;” dimension 3: “actively managing my health;” converted to scores 1-100) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included additional Health Literacy Questionnaire dimensions, quality of treatment choices, and clinical outcomes. Results A total of 453 participants were recruited, and 321 (70.9%) completed the primary outcomes. Access to MyBackPain was not superior to unguided internet use on primary outcomes (dimension 2: mean difference −0.87 units, 95% CI −3.56 to 1.82; dimension 3: mean difference −0.41 units, 95% CI −2.78 to 1.96). Between-group differences in other secondary outcomes had inconsistent directions and were unlikely to be clinically important, although a small improvement of unclear importance in the quality of stated treatment choices at 1 month was found (mean difference 0.93 units, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.84). Conclusions MyBackPain was not superior to unguided internet use for health literacy, but data suggest some short-term improvement in treatment choices. Future research should investigate if greater interactivity and engagement with the website may enhance its impact. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12617001292369; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372926 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027516
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul William Hodges
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Leanne Hall
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jenny Setchell
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Simon French
- Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jessica Kasza
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kim Bennell
- Centre for Health Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Hunter
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The Kolling Institute, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bill Vicenzino
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Samuel Crofts
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chris Dickson
- Department of Integrative Medicine, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Manuela Ferreira
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The Kolling Institute, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ziadni MS, Anderson SR, Gonzalez-Castro L, Darnall BD. Comparative efficacy of a single-session "Empowered Relief" videoconference-delivered group intervention for chronic pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:358. [PMID: 34022930 PMCID: PMC8140415 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05303-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain is naturally aversive and often distressing for patients. Pain coping and self-regulatory skills have been shown to effectively reduce pain-related distress and other symptoms. In this trial, the primary goal is to pilot test the comparative efficacy of a single-session videoconference-delivered group pain education class to a waitlist control among patients with chronic pain. METHODS Our study is a randomized clinical trial pilot testing the superiority of our 2-h single-session videoconference-delivered group pain education class against a waitlist control. We will enroll 120 adult patients with mixed etiology chronic pain and randomize 1:1 to one of the two study arms. We hypothesize superiority for the pain education class for bolstering pain and symptom management. Team researchers masked to treatment assignment will assess the outcomes up to 3 months post-treatment. DISCUSSION This study aims to test the utility of a single-session videoconference-delivered group pain education class to improve self-regulation of pain and pain-related outcomes. Findings from our project have the potential to significantly reduce barriers to effective psychological treatment for pain, optimizing the delivery of increasingly vital online and remote-delivered intervention options. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04546685 . Registered on 04 September 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa S Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
| | - Steven R Anderson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Lluvia Gonzalez-Castro
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Beth D Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kazemi S, Tavafian S, Hiller CE, Hidarnia A, Montazeri A. The effectiveness of social media and in-person interventions for low back pain conditions in nursing personnel (SMILE). Nurs Open 2021; 8:1220-1231. [PMID: 33905171 PMCID: PMC8046039 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare two educational approaches to reduce low back pain in nurses. DESIGN A community randomized controlled clinical trial. METHODS Data were collected with two interventions and a control arm between August 2018 and January 2019. Participants were recruited from three hospitals. Hospital 1 received an in-person educational programme, Hospital 2 received via the website and Hospital 3 received nothing. Statistical analysis was carried out with a follow-up of 3 and 6 months. RESULTS A total of 180 female nurses with low back pain participated in the study. Dimensions of the quality of life improved over 3 and 6 months, pain and disability decreased over 3 months in both intervention groups and over 6 months in the social media group. CONCLUSION Two educational approaches can be effective in decreasing pain, disability and improving quality of life. However, the findings suggest that the social media approach was more successful over the long-term and might be a better way to present the programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyedeh‐Somayeh Kazemi
- Department of Health Education & Health PromotionFaculty of Medical SciencesTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran
| | - Sedigheh‐Sadat Tavafian
- Department of Health Education & Health PromotionFaculty of Medical SciencesTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran
| | - Claire E. Hiller
- Faculty of Health SciencesSchool of PhysiotherapyUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Alireza Hidarnia
- Department of Health Education & Health PromotionFaculty of Medical SciencesTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran
| | - Ali Montazeri
- Health Metrics Research CenterIranian Institute for Health Sciences ResearchACECRTehranIran
- Faculty of Humanity SciencesUniversity of Sciences & CultureACECRTehranIran
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Raiszadeh K, Tapicer J, Taitano L, Wu J, Shahidi B. In-Clinic Versus Web-Based Multidisciplinary Exercise-Based Rehabilitation for Treatment of Low Back Pain: Prospective Clinical Trial in an Integrated Practice Unit Model. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e22548. [PMID: 33734088 PMCID: PMC8074858 DOI: 10.2196/22548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recent onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need to reduce barriers to access physical therapy and associated care through the use of web-based programs and telehealth for those seeking treatment for low back pain (LBP). Despite this need, few studies have compared the effectiveness of clinic-based versus web-based or telehealth services. OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of clinic-based multidisciplinary therapy in an integrated practice unit (C-IPU) model with online integrated multidisciplinary therapy (O-IPU) in individuals undergoing conservative care for LBP. METHODS A total of 1090 participants were prospectively recruited to participate in a clinical trial registry (NCT04081896) through the SpineZone rehabilitation IPU program. All participants provided informed consent. Participants were allocated to the C-IPU (N=988) or O-IPU (N=102) groups based on their personal preferences. The C-IPU program consisted of a high-intensity machine-based core muscle resistance training program, whereas the O-IPU program consisted of therapist-directed home core strengthening exercises through a web-based platform. Changes in LBP symptom severity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), goal achievement (Patient-Specific Functional Scale), and frequency of opioid use were compared between the C-IPU and O-IPU groups using multivariate linear regression modeling adjusted for age, gender, treatment number, program duration, and baseline pain and disability. RESULTS Approximately 93.03% (1014/1090) of the participants completed their recommended programs, with no group differences in dropout rates (P=.78). The C-IPU group showed greater pain relief (P<.001) and reductions in disability (P=.002) than the O-IPU group, whereas the O-IPU group reported greater improvements in goal achievement (P<.001). Both programs resulted in reduced opioid use frequency, with 19.0% (188/988) and 21.5% (22/102) of participants reporting cessation of opioid use for C-IPU and O-IPU programs, respectively, leaving only 5.59% (61/1090) of participants reporting opioid use at the end of their treatment. CONCLUSIONS Both in-clinic and web-based multidisciplinary programs are beneficial in reducing pain, disability, and opioid use and in improving goal achievement. The differences between these self-selected groups shed light on patient characteristics, which require further investigation and could help clinicians optimize these programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04081896; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04081896.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lissa Taitano
- Spinezone Medical Fitness, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Jonathan Wu
- Spinezone Medical Fitness, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Bahar Shahidi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Remote management of musculoskeletal pain: a pragmatic approach to the implementation of video and phone consultations in musculoskeletal practice. Pain Rep 2020; 5:e878. [PMID: 33344873 PMCID: PMC7743834 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Video and phone consultations for musculoskeletal pain are effective, safe, and appreciated by patients. Implementation and execution require special consideration and such guidance is provided. Introduction: Remote consultations through phone or video are gaining in importance for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain across a range of health care providers. However, there is a plethora of technical options for practitioners to choose from, and there are various challenges in the adaptation of clinical processes as well as several special considerations regarding regulatory context and patient management. Practitioners are faced with a lack of high-quality peer-reviewed resources to guide the planning and practical implementation of remote consultations. Objectives: This Clinical Update seeks to provide practical guidance for the planning and implementation of remote consultations for the management and treatment of people with musculoskeletal pain. Methods: Recommendations are based on a brief overview of the relevant research regarding phone and video consultations for musculoskeletal practice and derived from the literature, relevant guidelines, and practical experience. Results: The technical feasibility of remote consultations for musculoskeletal complaints is good, patient satisfaction is high, and a growing body of evidence supports its comparative effectiveness to in-person consultations in some circumstances for improving pain and functioning. We consider in detail practical aspects such as the choosing of hardware and software, we touch on the legal and regulatory context, and we focus on the adaptation of clinical processes and communication. Conclusion: This Clinical Update draws together best-practice evidence in a practically applicable format, enabling therapists who are working with people with pain to directly apply this knowledge to their individual clinical settings and the requirements of their patients.
Collapse
|
43
|
Svendsen MJ, Wood KW, Kyle J, Cooper K, Rasmussen CDN, Sandal LF, Stochkendahl MJ, Mair FS, Nicholl BI. Barriers and facilitators to patient uptake and utilisation of digital interventions for the self-management of low back pain: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038800. [PMID: 33310794 PMCID: PMC7735096 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low back pain (LBP) is a leading contributor to disability globally. Self-management is a core component of LBP management. We aimed to synthesise published qualitative literature concerning digital health interventions (DHIs) to support LBP self-management to: (1) determine engagement strategies, (2) identify barriers and facilitators affecting patient uptake/utilisation and (3) develop a preliminary conceptual model of barriers and facilitators to uptake/utilisation. DESIGN Systematic review following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, DoPHER, TRoPHI, Web of Science and OT Seeker, from January 2000 to December 2018, using the concepts: LBP, DHI and self-management. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Peer-reviewed qualitative study (or component) examining engagement with, or barriers and/or facilitators to the uptake/utilisation of an interactive DHI for self-management of LBP in adults (community, primary or secondary care settings). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Standardised data extraction form was completed. COREQ (Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research) checklist was used to assess methodology. Data was synthesised narratively for engagement strategies, thematically for barriers/facilitators to uptake/utilisation and normalisation process theory was applied to produce a conceptual model. RESULTS We identified 14 191 citations, of which 105 full-text articles were screened, and five full-text articles from four studies included. These were from community and primary care contexts in Europe and the USA, and involved 56 adults with LBP and 19 healthcare professionals. There was a lack of consideration on how to sustain engagement with DHIs. Examination of barriers and facilitators for uptake/utilisation identified four major themes: IT (information technology) usability-accessibility; quality-quantity of content; tailoring-personalisation; and motivation-support. These themes informed the development of a preliminary conceptual model for uptake/utilisation of a DHI for LBP self-management. CONCLUSIONS We highlight key barriers and facilitators that should be considered when designing DHIs for LBP self-management. Our findings are in keeping with reviews of DHIs for other long-term conditions, implying these findings may not be condition specific. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION A protocol for this systematic review was registered with https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (CRD42016051182) on 10 November 2016. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42016051182.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malene Jagd Svendsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Musculoskeletal disorders and physical work demands, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Karen Wood Wood
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Kyle
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kay Cooper
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Louise Fleng Sandal
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mette Jensen Stochkendahl
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark
| | - Frances S Mair
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Barbara I Nicholl
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ariza-Mateos MJ, Cabrera-Martos I, Prados-Román E, Granados-Santiago M, Rodríguez-Torres J, Carmen Valenza M. A systematic review of internet-based interventions for women with chronic pain. Br J Occup Ther 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/0308022620970861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction To evaluate the effects of internet-based interventions on physical and psychosocial outcomes in women with chronic pain through a systematic review. Method A search of the following electronic databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. Two different authors separately tabulated the indices selected in identical predetermined forms. The methodological quality of all randomised trials was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias. Results Seven articles were finally included. The main features of interventions included online cognitive-behavioural and/or psychoeducation therapy to improve health with an interactive component. The methodological quality showed a high risk of bias, mainly from a lack of blinding. Conclusion There are indicators that suggest that internet-based interventions may be useful for women with chronic pain. However, the validity of such a conclusion is limited as most trials included had a high risk of bias. More rigorous research is required before stating that such interventions can overcome the current limitations of traditional face-to-face care.
Collapse
|
45
|
Magalhães B, Fernandes C, Martinez-Galiano JM, Santos C. Exploring the use of Mobile applications by cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A scoping review. Int J Med Inform 2020; 144:104293. [PMID: 33091832 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 08/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PROPOSE Advancements in mobile technology, primarily through the use of applications, may support the process of monitoring adherence to oral therapies, controlling toxicities, or providing self-care guidelines to patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment. This study aims to assemble the available knowledge regarding the use of mobile applications by cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment. METHODS A literature review based on the Joanna Briggs Institute model(s) for Scoping Review was conducted. All articles published until 30 May 2019, were identified in the MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, and PsycINFO® electronic databases using the related Boolean logical operators and key terms. Extracted data included research aims, methodological design, application name, the functionalities of the applications, and major results. RESULTS A total of 26 articles were included in this study. The search identified 16 different mobile applications, some of which were addressed in various publications, demonstrating different characteristics in design, use, and development. CONCLUSION The use of mobile applications can be seen as an important and effective way to monitor adherence and support in the self-management of complications associated with chemotherapy treatments. Notwithstanding, these applications should be tested outside the academic environment, outreaching this group of people to effectively investigate its applicability, allowing the assessment of the impact of this "new" technological intervention process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Magalhães
- Portuguese Institute for Oncology of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal; Health School Santa Maria (ESSSM), Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research (NursID: Innovation and Development in Nursing), Porto, Portugal.
| | - Carla Fernandes
- CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research (NursID: Innovation and Development in Nursing), Porto, Portugal; Nursing School of Porto (ESEP), Porto, Portugal.
| | - Juan Miguel Martinez-Galiano
- Department of Nursing, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center for Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain.
| | - Célia Santos
- CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research (NursID: Innovation and Development in Nursing), Porto, Portugal; Nursing School of Porto (ESEP), Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
De Oliveira Silva D, Pazzinatto MF, Crossley KM, Azevedo FM, Barton CJ. Novel Stepped Care Approach to Provide Education and Exercise Therapy for Patellofemoral Pain: Feasibility Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e18584. [PMID: 32706674 PMCID: PMC7407256 DOI: 10.2196/18584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patellofemoral pain (PFP) impairs joint- and health-related quality of life and may be associated with knee osteoarthritis. We developed a novel, 2-phase, stepped-care approach for PFP, combining (1) self-directed web-based education and exercise therapy with (2) physiotherapist-supported education and exercise therapy. Physiotherapy sessions can be provided using 2 different modalities: face-to-face and telerehabilitation. Objective This study aims to (1) determine the feasibility of our stepped-care approach, (2) explore patient-reported outcomes following self-directed web-based education and exercise therapy in people with PFP (phase 1), and (3) estimate the differences in treatment effects between face-to-face and telerehabilitation to support further education and exercise therapy (phase 2) in those who had not completely recovered following self-directed care. Methods Phase 1 involved 6 weeks of self-directed web-based education and exercise therapy. Phase 2 involved random allocation to a further 12 weeks of physiotherapist-led (up to 8 sessions) education and exercise therapy delivered face-to-face or via telerehabilitation to participants who did not rate themselves as completely recovered following phase 1. Feasibility indicators of process, adherence, and participant retention were collected as primary outcomes alongside patient-reported outcomes on Global Rating of Change and knee pain, disability, knee-related quality of life, pain catastrophism, kinesiophobia, and knee self-efficacy. All participants were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 18 weeks. Results A total of 71 participants were screened to identify 35 participants with PFP to enter the study. Overall, 100% (35/35) and 88% (31/35) of the participants were followed up with at 6 and 18 weeks, respectively. In phase 1 of the study, participants accessed the My Knee Cap website for an average of 6 (7.5) days and performed the exercises for an average of 2.5 (3.6) times per week. A total of 20% (7/35) of the participants reported that they had completely recovered at 6 weeks. Furthermore, 93% (26/28) of the participants who were followed up and had not completely recovered at 6 weeks agreed to be enrolled in phase 2. No statistically significant differences were found between the face-to-face and telerehabilitation groups for any outcome. The novel stepped-care approach was associated with marked improvement or complete recovery in 40% (14/35) of the participants following phase 1 and 71% (25/35) of the participants following phase 2. Conclusions Self-directed web-based education and exercise therapy for people with PFP is feasible, as noted by the high rate of participant retention and home exercise adherence achieved in this study. Furthermore, 20% (7/35) of people reported complete recovery at 6 weeks. Both face-to-face and telerehabilitation physiotherapy should be considered for those continuing to seek care, as there is no difference in outcomes between these delivery modes. Determining the efficacy of the stepped-care model may help guide more efficient health care for PFP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo De Oliveira Silva
- La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marcella F Pazzinatto
- La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kay M Crossley
- La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fabio M Azevedo
- Laboratory of Biomechanics and Motor Control, Sao Paulo State University, Presidente Prudente, Brazil
| | - Christian J Barton
- La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Baadjou VA, Hollander MD, Meulenbroek TV, Verbunt JA, Timmers I. Clinicians' Initial Experiences of Transition to Online Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation During the Covid-19 Pandemic. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE - CLINICAL COMMUNICATIONS 2020; 3:1000036. [PMID: 33884138 PMCID: PMC8008721 DOI: 10.2340/20030711-1000036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective Public health legislation during the CO-VID-19 pandemic has resulted in forced transitioning to the use of remote care in order to continue the provision of pain rehabilitation worldwide. The objective of this study was to gain insight into clinicians’ initial experiences with the provision of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation via videoconferencing. Design Observational, cross-sectional design. Participants Twelve team members (specialists in rehabilitation medicine -MD-, psychologists, physiotherapists and occupational therapists) from a tertiary expertise centre in pain rehabilitation. Methods Quantitative and qualitative data were collected via a digital survey. Theme-based content analysis was performed for qualitative data. Results The themes that emerged were: the compulsory context; prerequisites for proper use of videoconferencing methods, which are strongly associated with the clinicians’ experiences; changes experienced in specific components of pain rehabilitation; and overarching changes experienced, including opportunities and limitations (sub-themes: therapeutic relationship, system involvement, efficiency, hands-on possibilities, interdisciplinary teamwork, and formalities). Overall, clinicians expressed moderate agreement with the statements that the quality of the pain rehabilitation programme can be maintained using videoconferencing, and that the COVID-19 pandemic offers opportunities for growth and innovation in telehealth. Conclusion It is feasible to provide valid and satisfactory pain rehabilitation via videoconferencing. This study identified facilitators and barriers to the use of videoconferencing, and great potential for integrating aspects of telehealth into standard care after the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera A Baadjou
- Adelante Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies Den Hollander
- Adelante Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs Van Meulenbroek
- Adelante Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanine A Verbunt
- Adelante Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Timmers
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Du S, Liu W, Cai S, Hu Y, Dong J. The efficacy of e-health in the self-management of chronic low back pain: A meta analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2020; 106:103507. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
49
|
Priebe JA, Utpadel-Fischler D, Toelle TR. Less Pain, Better Sleep? The Effect of a Multidisciplinary Back Pain App on Sleep Quality in Individuals Suffering from Back Pain - a Secondary Analysis of App User Data. J Pain Res 2020; 13:1121-1128. [PMID: 32547175 PMCID: PMC7246313 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s232792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Mobile health solutions are finding their way into health systems. The Kaia app has been shown to be able to reduce back pain in two studies. Since pain often comes along with disturbed sleep and both symptoms are strongly related we investigated whether the Kaia app training is associated with improved sleep quality. Methods User data of individuals with back pain were collected in two app versions (cohort 1: N = 180; cohort 2: N = 159). We analyzed the ratings of sleep quality and pain intensity on a 11-point numeric ratings scale (NRS; 0–10) both at the beginning of usage (baseline: BL) and on the individual last day of usage (follow-up: LU) within a 3-month training program. Results In both cohorts, we found a significant reduction in pain intensity from BL to LU (cohort 1: MBL = 4.80; SD = 1.59 to MLU = 3.75; SD = 1.76, Δpain = –1.04; SD = 2.12; t(158) = 6.207; p<.001/cohort 2: MBL = 4.20; SD = 1.98 to MLU = 3.65; SD = 1.78; Δpain = –0.50; SD = 2.04; t(147) = 3.001; p = 0.003) and a significant improvement of sleep quality (cohort 1: MBL = 5.76; SD = 2.12 to MLU = 6.56; SD = 1.72; Δsleep = t(158) = 4.310; p < 0.001/cohort 2: MBL = 6.08; SD = 2.08 to MLU = 6.76; SD = 1.55; Δsleep = 0.67; SD = 2.13; sleep: t(147) = 3.825; p < 0.001). Interestingly, improvement of sleep quality was not fully mediated by pain reduction. Conclusion Our analysis underlines the relationship between pain and sleep in the clinical context. Improvement of sleep quality came along with pain reduction and vice versa. Further study should explain the exact mechanisms of action which are associated with the improvement of both symptom parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janosch A Priebe
- Center of Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Utpadel-Fischler
- Center of Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas R Toelle
- Center of Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Babatunde FO, MacDermid J, Grewal R, Macedo L, Szekeres M. Development and Usability Testing of a Web-Based and Therapist-Assisted Coping Skills Program for Managing Psychosocial Problems in Individuals With Hand and Upper Limb Injuries: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2020; 7:e17088. [PMID: 32374265 PMCID: PMC7240444 DOI: 10.2196/17088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Ineffective coping has been linked to prolonged pain, distress, anxiety, and depression after a hand and upper limb injury. Evidence shows that interventions based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may be effective in improving treatment outcomes, but traditional psychological interventions are resource intensive and unrealistic in busy hand therapy practices. Developing web-based, evidence-based psychological interventions specifically for hand therapy may be feasible in clinical practice and at home with reduced training and travel costs. Hand Therapy Online Coping Skills (HOCOS) is a program developed to supplement traditional hand therapy with therapist-assisted coping skills training based on principles from CBT and the Technology Acceptance Model. Objective This study aimed to describe the development and assess the usability of HOCOS to support hand therapists in the management of psychosocial problems. Methods The ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) of system design was applied to create HOCOS. The usability testing of HOCOS involved a 2-stage process. In the first step, heuristic testing with information and communications technology (ICT) experts was completed using two sets of heuristics: Monkman heuristics and the Health Literacy Online (HLO) checklist. The second step involved user testing with hand therapists performing a series of online and face-to-face activities, completing 12 tasks on the website using the think-aloud protocol, completing the system usability scale (SUS) questionnaire, and a semistructured feedback interview in 2 iterative cycles. Descriptive statistics and content analyses were used to organize the data. Results In total, 4 ICT experts and 12 therapists completed usability testing. The heuristic evaluation revealed 15 of 35 violations on the HLO checklist and 5 of 11 violations on the Monkman heuristics. Initially, hand therapists found 5 tasks to be difficult but were able to complete all 12 tasks after the second cycle of testing. The cognitive interview findings were organized into 6 themes: task performance, navigation, design esthetics, content, functionality and features, and desire for future use. Usability issues identified were addressed in two iterative cycles. There was good agreement on all items of the SUS. Overall, therapists found that HOCOS was a detailed and helpful learning resource for therapists and patients. Conclusions We describe the development and usability testing of HOCOS; a new web-based psychosocial intervention for individuals with a hand and upper limb injuries. HOCOS targets psychosocial problems linked to prolonged pain and disability by increasing access to therapist-guided coping skills training. We actively involved target users in the development and usability evaluation of the website. The final website was modified to meet the needs and preferences of the participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Folarin Omoniyi Babatunde
- School of Rehabilitation Science, Institute of Applied Health Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Joy MacDermid
- School of Rehabilitation Science, Institute of Applied Health Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care London, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Department of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ruby Grewal
- Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care London, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Luciana Macedo
- School of Rehabilitation Science, Institute of Applied Health Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mike Szekeres
- Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care London, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|