1
|
Huttunen MH, Paananen M, Miettunen J, Kalso E, Marttinen MK. Multidisciplinary management of persistent pain in primary care-A systematic review. Eur J Pain 2024; 28:886-900. [PMID: 38294101 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE A multidisciplinary approach is the gold standard in the management of persistent pain and is current practice in tertiary pain clinics. However, such approaches seem to be a rarity in primary care, although pain is the most common reason for visiting a primary care physician. A comprehensive systematic review was conducted to explore whether studies on multidisciplinary management programs for persistent pain exist in primary care. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched from inception to October 2022, and supplementary research was conducted in June 2023. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were independently carried out by two researchers. The inclusion criteria were (1) adult patients (age >18 years); (2) non-cancer pain, persisting over 3 months; (3) multidisciplinary intervention (treatment included ≥3 heathcare professionals); (4) intervention conducted in a primary care setting; and (5) reports published in English. RESULTS Of the 1250 initially identified studies, 17 were selected for final analysis. Only studies reporting empirical data were included (cohort, case-control, randomized controlled trial, and observational). The study settings and intervention characteristics showed great heterogeneity. The primary care practices also varied across different countries and cultures. Overall, the quality of the studies was rather low and sample sizes were relatively small. CONCLUSIONS The review revealed that studies about such treatment interventions for persistent pain patients are scarce. The existing studies were heterogeneous in terms of intervention characteristics, population, outcome variables, and study methodology. Future studies are urgently needed. SIGNIFICANCE Persistent pain is a growing challenge to the health care system, and most patients are treated in primary care. The biopsychosocial concept is the basis for the multidisciplinary management of pain. The review revealed that studies about treatment interventions for persistent pain patients are scarce. Existing studies were heterogeneous in terms of intervention characteristics, population, outcome variables, and study methodology. There is an urgent need for further studies on systematic multidisciplinary treatment protocols for managing persistent pain in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merja H Huttunen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Kerava Health Center, Kerava, Finland
| | - Markus Paananen
- Kerava Health Center, Kerava, Finland
- Research Unit of Population Health, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Primary Health Care Services, City of Espoo, Espoo, Finland
| | - Jouko Miettunen
- Research Unit of Population Health, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Eija Kalso
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Maiju K Marttinen
- Kerava Health Center, Kerava, Finland
- The Rehabilitation Center of Central Uusimaa, The Wellbeing Services County of Central Uusimaa, Finland
- Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bendelin N, Gerdle B, Andersson G. Hurdles and potentials when implementing internet-delivered Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a retrospective appraisal using the Quality implementation framework. Scand J Pain 2024; 24:sjpain-2022-0139. [PMID: 37855128 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2022-0139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Internet-delivered psychological interventions can be regarded as evidence-based practices and have been implemented in psychiatric and somatic care at primary and specialist levels. However, challenges as low adherence and poor routinization, have arisen during attempts to implement internet-delivered interventions in chronic pain settings. Internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (IACT) has been found to be helpful for chronic pain patients and might aid in developing pain rehabilitation services. However, the integration of IACT into standard health care has not yet been described from an implementation science perspective. The aim of this hybrid 1 effectiveness-implementation study was to evaluate the process of implementing IACT in a pain rehabilitation setting, to guide future implementation initiatives. METHODS In this retrospective study we described actions taken during an implementation initiative, in which IACT was delivered as part of an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (IPRP) at a specialist level clinic. All documents relevant to the study were reviewed and coded using the Quality Improvement Framework (QIF), focusing on adoption, appropriateness and sustainability. RESULTS The QIF-analysis of implementation actions resulted in two categories: facilitators and challenges for implementation. Sustainability may be facilitated by sensitivity to the changing needs of a clinical setting and challenged by unfitting capacity building. Appropriateness might be challenged by an insufficient needs assessment and facilitated by aligning routines for communication with the clinic's existing infrastructure. Adoption may be facilitated by staff key champions and an ability to adapt to occurring hurdles. Possible influential factors, hypotheses and key process challenges are presented in a logic model to guide future initiatives. CONCLUSIONS Sustainable implementation may depend on both the continuity of facilitating implementation actions and flexibility to the changing needs and interests of patients, caregivers and organization. We conclude that the use of theories, models and frameworks (TMF) as well as a logic model may ease design, planning and evaluation of an implementation process. Lastly, we suggest that IACT may be appropriate for IPRP when given before or after IPRP, focusing on psychiatric comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Bendelin
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Björn Gerdle
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Gerhard Andersson
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang J, Wang R, Zhao P, Han T, Li M, He Y, Liu Y. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Mental Health Quality of Life (MHQoL) questionnaire in a Chinese-speaking population with chronic musculoskeletal pain. BMC Psychol 2023; 11:435. [PMID: 38066558 PMCID: PMC10709826 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01482-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Mental Health Quality of Life (MHQoL) questionnaire is concise and suitable for rapid assessment of CMP (chronic musculoskeletal pain) patients in primary care. However, there is a lack of Chinese versions of the MHQoL. OBJECTIVE To cross-culturally translate the MHQoL into Chinese and to assess its psychometric properties in Chinese-speaking patients with CMP. METHODS The MHQoL was translated into Chinese according to the International Guidelines for the Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. 171 CMP patients were recruited to receive the Chinese versions of the MHQoL, SF-36, and HADS tests, and the MHQoL was retested seven days later. RESULT The Chinese version of MHQoL had good retest reliability (MHQoL-7D: ICC = 0.971; MHQoL-VAS: ICC = 0.988) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.829). It showed a moderate correlation with the SF-36 total score (r=-0.509); the MHQoL-VAS moderately correlated with the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (r=-0.548). The MHQoL-7D showed no correlations with the SF-36's PF (r=-0.083) and BP (r=-0.170), weak correlations with RP (r=-0.284), RE (r=-0.298), and SF (r=-0.380), and moderate-to-strong correlations with GH (r=-0.638), VT (r=-0.480), and MH (r=-0.632). CONCLUSION The Chinese version of the MHQoL can be used in clinical practice and research in Chinese-speaking CMP patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jialin Wang
- Sports Rehabilitation Research Center, China Institute of Sport Science, Beijing, China
| | - Ruirui Wang
- Sports Rehabilitation Research Center, China Institute of Sport Science, Beijing, China
- College of Sports Medicine and Physical Therapy, Beijing Sports University, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Zhao
- Sports Rehabilitation Research Center, China Institute of Sport Science, Beijing, China.
| | - Tianran Han
- Sports Rehabilitation Research Center, China Institute of Sport Science, Beijing, China
| | - Meng Li
- Sports Rehabilitation Research Center, China Institute of Sport Science, Beijing, China
- College of Sports Medicine and Physical Therapy, Beijing Sports University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuwei He
- Sports Rehabilitation Research Center, China Institute of Sport Science, Beijing, China
- College of Sports Medicine and Physical Therapy, Beijing Sports University, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Liu
- Centre for Chinese International Education, School of Humanities, Communication University of China, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shetty A, Delanerolle G, Zeng Y, Shi JQ, Ebrahim R, Pang J, Hapangama D, Sillem M, Shetty S, Shetty B, Hirsch M, Raymont V, Majumder K, Chong S, Goodison W, O’Hara R, Hull L, Pluchino N, Shetty N, Elneil S, Fernandez T, Brownstone RM, Phiri P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of digital application use in clinical research in pain medicine. Front Digit Health 2022; 4:850601. [PMID: 36405414 PMCID: PMC9668017 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.850601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Pain is a silent global epidemic impacting approximately a third of the population. Pharmacological and surgical interventions are primary modes of treatment. Cognitive/behavioural management approaches and interventional pain management strategies are approaches that have been used to assist with the management of chronic pain. Accurate data collection and reporting treatment outcomes are vital to addressing the challenges faced. In light of this, we conducted a systematic evaluation of the current digital application landscape within chronic pain medicine. OBJECTIVE The primary objective was to consider the prevalence of digital application usage for chronic pain management. These digital applications included mobile apps, web apps, and chatbots. DATA SOURCES We conducted searches on PubMed and ScienceDirect for studies that were published between 1st January 1990 and 1st January 2021. STUDY SELECTION Our review included studies that involved the use of digital applications for chronic pain conditions. There were no restrictions on the country in which the study was conducted. Only studies that were peer-reviewed and published in English were included. Four reviewers had assessed the eligibility of each study against the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Out of the 84 studies that were initially identified, 38 were included in the systematic review. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS The AMSTAR guidelines were used to assess data quality. This assessment was carried out by 3 reviewers. The data were pooled using a random-effects model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Before data collection began, the primary outcome was to report on the standard mean difference of digital application usage for chronic pain conditions. We also recorded the type of digital application studied (e.g., mobile application, web application) and, where the data was available, the standard mean difference of pain intensity, pain inferences, depression, anxiety, and fatigue. RESULTS 38 studies were included in the systematic review and 22 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The digital interventions were categorised to web and mobile applications and chatbots, with pooled standard mean difference of 0.22 (95% CI: -0.16, 0.60), 0.30 (95% CI: 0.00, 0.60) and -0.02 (95% CI: -0.47, 0.42) respectively. Pooled standard mean differences for symptomatologies of pain intensity, depression, and anxiety symptoms were 0.25 (95% CI: 0.03, 0.46), 0.30 (95% CI: 0.17, 0.43) and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.69), respectively. A sub-group analysis was conducted on pain intensity due to the heterogeneity of the results (I 2 = 82.86%; p = 0.02). After stratifying by country, we found that digital applications were more likely to be effective in some countries (e.g., United States, China) than others (e.g., Ireland, Norway). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The use of digital applications in improving pain-related symptoms shows promise, but further clinical studies would be needed to develop more robust applications. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42021228343.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish Shetty
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gayathri Delanerolle
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Yutian Zeng
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China,Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jian Qing Shi
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China,Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rawan Ebrahim
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Pang
- Research & Innovation Department, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Dharani Hapangama
- Department of Women and Children’s Health, Liverpool Women’s NHS Foundation, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Sillem
- Praxisklinik am Rosengarten Mannheim, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Martin Hirsch
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gynaecology, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Vanessa Raymont
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kingshuk Majumder
- University of Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Gynaecology, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Chong
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom,Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - William Goodison
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca O’Hara
- Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Louise Hull
- Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Naresh Shetty
- Department of Orthopedics, M.S. Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore, India
| | - Sohier Elneil
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom,Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tacson Fernandez
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom,Chronic Pain Medicine, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert M. Brownstone
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Phiri
- Research & Innovation Department, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom,Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education Division, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom,Correspondence: Peter Phiri
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nielsen SS, Skou ST, Larsen AE, Bricca A, Søndergaard J, Christensen JR. The Effect of Occupational Engagement on Lifestyle in Adults Living with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Occup Ther Int 2022; 2022:7082159. [PMID: 35814357 PMCID: PMC9208937 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7082159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Healthy lifestyle is important to decrease health risks in individuals living with chronic pain. From an occupational therapy perspective, human health and lifestyle are linked to occupational engagement in meaningful everyday activities. This study is aimed at investigating the effect of including occupational engagement in chronic pain interventions on lifestyle. Methods In this systematic review (PROSPERO reg. CRD42020159279), we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on interventions involving occupational engagement (i.e., occupational performance based on involvement, choice, positive meaning, and commitment) and assessing modifiable lifestyle factors: physical activity, body anthropometrics, alcohol consumption, smoking, stress, and sleep. We sought the databases Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, OTseeker, ClinicalTrials.gov, OpenGrey, and the web engine Google Scholar and citations and references of relevant publications. We evaluated methodological quality with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2.0, determined the overall evidence certainty using the GRADE methodology, and performed meta-analysis when two or more trials reported on the outcomes. Results Of the 9526 items identified, 286 were full text screened. We included twelve articles with eleven RCTs comprising 995 adults and assessing physical activity, sleep quality, stress, and Body Mass Index. Sufficient data for meta-analysis was only available for physical activity and sleep quality. The meta-analysis suggested a moderate increase in physical activity after behavioral interventions for fibromyalgia and musculoskeletal pain (SMD = 0.69 (0.29; 1.09)) and a small increase in sleep quality up to 6 months after multidisciplinary self-management of fibromyalgia (SMD = 0.35 (95% CI 0.08; 0.61)). The overall certainty of the evidence was deemed low. Conclusion Including occupational engagement in chronic pain interventions may increase short-term physical activity and long-term sleep quality. Due to the few available RCTs including occupational engagement in chronic pain treatment for adults living with chronic pain, further high-quality RCTs are needed and will likely change the conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svetlana Solgaard Nielsen
- Research Unit for User Perspectives, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsloews Vej 9B, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
- The Research Unit PROgrez, Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Faelledvej 2C, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Søren T. Skou
- The Research Unit PROgrez, Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Faelledvej 2C, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark
- Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Anette Enemark Larsen
- Department of Therapy and Midwifery Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Alessio Bricca
- The Research Unit PROgrez, Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Faelledvej 2C, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark
- Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Jens Søndergaard
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsloews Vej 9A, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen
- Research Unit for User Perspectives, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsloews Vej 9B, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsloews Vej 9A, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
- Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Implementation of Online Behavior Modification Techniques in the Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11071806. [PMID: 35407414 PMCID: PMC8999801 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The main aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) was to assess the effectiveness of online behavior modification techniques (e-BMT) in the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods: We conducted a search of Medline (PubMed), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, APA PsychInfo, and Psychological and Behavioral Collections, from inception to the 30 August 2021. The main outcome measures were pain intensity, pain interference, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing and self-efficacy. The statistical analysis was conducted using RStudio software. To compare the outcomes reported by the studies, we calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) over time and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for the continuous variables. Results: Regarding pain intensity (vs. usual care/waiting list), we found a statistically significant trivial effect size in favor of e-BMT (n = 5337; SMD = −0.17; 95% CI −0.26, −0.09). With regard to pain intensity (vs. in-person BMT) we found a statistically significant small effect size in favor of in-person BMT (n = 486; SMD = 0.21; 95%CI 0.15, 0.27). With respect to pain interference (vs. usual care/waiting list) a statistically significant small effect size of e-BMT was found (n = 1642; SMD = −0.24; 95%CI −0.44, −0.05). Finally, the same results were found in kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, and self-efficacy (vs. usual care/waiting list) where we found a statistically significant small effect size in favor of e-BMT. Conclusions: e-BMT seems to be an effective option for the management of patients with musculoskeletal conditions although it does not appear superior to in-person BMT in terms of improving pain intensity.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kelly M, Fullen B, Martin D, McMahon S, McVeigh JG. eHealth Interventions to Support Self-Management in People With Musculoskeletal Disorders, "eHealth: It's TIME"-A Scoping Review. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6506314. [PMID: 35079826 PMCID: PMC8994513 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE eHealth-mediated interventions have been proposed as one option to support self-management in those with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). This scoping review aimed to chart the evidence regarding eHealth modalities, musculoskeletal diagnosis, and outcomes of eHealth-mediated self-management support interventions in persons with MSDs and identify any gaps within the literature. METHODS Six electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), 7 grey literature sources (eg, OpenGrey), and reference and citation lists of included studies were searched from database inception to July 2020. Published studies of adult participants with a MSD utilizing an eHealth intervention to support self-management were included. Studies were limited to those published in English. Two reviewers independently screened all studies. Data were extracted by 1 reviewer and reviewed by another reviewer. RESULTS After screening 3377 titles and abstracts followed by 176 full texts, 87 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The majority were published in the last 5 years (n = 48; 55%), with almost one-third originating in the United States (n = 28; 32%). The most common eHealth modality type was internet based (n = 22; 35%), with almost one-half (n = 41; 47%) of the included studies involving participants with widespread musculoskeletal symptoms. The most commonly reported outcomes were related to body functions (ie, pain intensity) (n = 67; 45%), closely followed by activities and participation (ie, function) (n = 65; 44%), with environmental factors (ie, health care utilization) the least commonly reported (n = 17; 20%). CONCLUSIONS There is considerable variation within the eHealth-mediated self-management support intervention literature. Research is needed on the role of eHealth-mediated self-management support interventions across a broad range of MSDs to guide clinical practice. IMPACT This scoping review has identified gaps in the literature relating to specific eHealth modalities, musculoskeletal diagnoses, and health care utilization data, which should guide future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Kelly
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland,Department of Physiotherapy, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland,Address all correspondence to Marie Kelly at:
| | - Brona Fullen
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Denis Martin
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom,NIHR Applied Research Collaborative, North East and North Cumbria, United Kingdom
| | - Sinéad McMahon
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Joseph G McVeigh
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bendelin N, Gerdle B, Blom M, Södermark M, Andersson G. Internet-Delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Added to Multimodal Pain Rehabilitation: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10245872. [PMID: 34945167 PMCID: PMC8705416 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10245872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Internet-delivered interventions hold the possibility to make pain rehabilitation more accessible and adaptable by providing qualified individualized psychological care to chronic pain patients in their homes. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has shown promising results on psychological functioning and pain acceptance. Internet-delivered ACT (IACT) added to multimodal pain rehabilitation program (MMRP) in primary care has, so far, not shown better results than MMRP alone. The aim of this cluster randomized controlled study was to investigate the effects of adding IACT during and after MMRP in specialist care on psychological outcomes. In total, 122 patients who enrolled in a specialist pain clinic were cluster randomized groupwise to either MMRP (n = 12 groups) or to MMRP with added IACT (n = 12 groups). The IACT addition included 6 weeks of treatment during MMRP and 11 weeks of aftercare following MMRP. Online and paper-and-pencil self-report measures of pain acceptance, psychological inflexibility, self-efficacy, and psychosocial consequences of pain, were collected at four occasions: prior to and post MMRP, post aftercare intervention and at 1 year follow-up. Dropout was extensive with 25% dropping out at post treatment, an additional 35% at post aftercare, and 29% at 1 year follow-up. Medium treatment between-group effects were found on pain acceptance in favor of the group who received IACT added to MMRP, at post treatment and at post aftercare. Large effects were seen on psychological inflexibility and self-efficacy at post aftercare. A medium effect size was seen on affective distress at post aftercare. Moreover, a medium effect on self-efficacy was found at 1 year follow-up. The results indicate that IACT added during MMRP may enhance the treatment effects on pain-related psychological outcomes. Results also suggest that IACT as aftercare may strengthen the long-term effect of MMRP. However, adding a second pain treatment, IACT, to an already extensive pain treatment, MMRP, could be perceived as too comprehensive and might hence influence completion negatively. Further research on adverse events and negative effects could be helpful to improve adherence. Next step of implementation trials could focus on adding IACT before MMRP to improve psychological functioning and after MMRP to prolong its effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Bendelin
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden; (B.G.); (M.B.); (M.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Björn Gerdle
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden; (B.G.); (M.B.); (M.S.)
| | - Marie Blom
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden; (B.G.); (M.B.); (M.S.)
| | - Martin Södermark
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden; (B.G.); (M.B.); (M.S.)
| | - Gerhard Andersson
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden;
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
A Scoping Review of the Evidence regarding Assessment and Management of Psychological Features of Shoulder Pain. Rehabil Res Pract 2021; 2021:7211201. [PMID: 34631168 PMCID: PMC8497138 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7211201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Methods A scoping review of research studies identified through PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL and graduate theses identified using Google Scholar was conducted to determine studies and systematic reviews that addressed the management of psychological aspects of shoulder pain with or without neck pain. The search terms included psychological factors, anxiety, depression, catastrophic thinking, fear of movement, and psychological treatments. Two investigators screened study titles and abstracts. Data extraction, content analysis, and thematic coding focused on the dimensions of pain addressed (emotional, behavioural, and cognitive) and treatment approaches used (dimensions targeted, specific treatment parameters) and the linkage between treatment targets/rationale with interventions/outcomes measured. Results Ten studies (seven randomized trials and three cohorts) were identified that addressed the psychological aspects of shoulder pain. Out of seven RCTs, four compared psychological interventions with usual care. Eight studies used cognitive approaches, including emotional freedom techniques (EFT), pain coping strategies (PCS), physical-cognitive-mindfulness training (PCMT), psychological flexibility, face-to-face cognitive-behavioural treatment (CBT), and cognitive therapy using virtual reality (V.R.). Three studies used the behavioural approaches as their intervention, including behavioural therapy and Graded Exercise Therapy (GET). Pain intensity was addressed as the primary outcome in two studies and as a secondary outcome in five studies. Cognitive factors were evaluated in 50% of the articles using nine different measures. Emotional factors were evaluated in 80% of articles using ten different measures. Reduction of pain intensity and catastrophic thinking concerning pain was achieved in most studies using a biopsychosocial approach (70%). Applying a behavioural approach was associated with reductions in kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing. Cognitive approaches had a positive association with reductions in the emotional aspect of pain. Only one study specifically linked rationale or specific physical and psychosocial treatment targets with the treatments provided and outcomes measured. Conclusions Small pools of studies indicate that the rationale and treatment targeting are poorly defined in biopsychosocial interventions for shoulder pain. However, these benefits have been demonstrated when cognitive or behavioural components are added to the standard physical treatment of shoulder pain. A better definition of treatment targets, description of intervention components, and linkage of outcomes to targets are needed to advance our understanding of optimizing bio-psychosocial approaches.
Collapse
|
10
|
de Oliveira Lima L, Saragiotto BT, Costa LOP, Nogueira LC, Meziat-Filho N, Reis FJJ. Self-Guided Web-Based Pain Education for People With Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther 2021; 101:6309587. [PMID: 34174081 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of web-based pain education programs without clinical support in patients with musculoskeletal pain. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to February 2020. Included studies were randomized clinical trials in which people with musculoskeletal pain were allocated to an experimental group that received web-based pain education as a standalone approach. Three review authors performed data extraction. The PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. The primary outcomes were pain intensity and disability. RESULTS Six trials with a total of 1664 participants were included. There is moderate-quality evidence with a small effect size that web-based pain education programs, as a standalone approach, are better than minimal intervention (no intervention or booklets) for pain intensity (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.23; 95% CI = -0.43 to -0.04) in the short term and intermediate term (SMD = -0.26; 95% CI = -0.42 to -0.10). Regarding disability, there is low-quality evidence that web-based pain education programs are better than minimal intervention (SMD = -0.36; 95% CI = -0.64 to -0.07) in the short term. Web-based pain education added to usual care was no better than usual care alone in the intermediate or long term for primary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Web-based pain education for adults with musculoskeletal pain, as a standalone approach, was better than minimal intervention for pain intensity and disability in the short term, and for pain intensity in the intermediate term. Web-based pain education added to usual care did not provide additional benefits for primary outcomes in the intermediate or long term. IMPACT Web-based pain education as a standalone intervention provided small improvements in pain intensity and disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Poorly resourced settings and overburdened health systems should consider this delivery method in the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. LAY SUMMARY If you have chronic musculoskeletal pain, your physical therapist might recommend web-based pain education as treatment to help you reduce pain intensity and disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lívia de Oliveira Lima
- Physical Therapy Department, Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Bruno T Saragiotto
- Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Leandro Calazans Nogueira
- Physical Therapy Department, Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Postgraduation Progam in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Ney Meziat-Filho
- Postgraduation Progam in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Felipe J J Reis
- Physical Therapy Department, Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Postgraduation Progam in Clinical Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lamper C, Beckers L, Kroese M, Verbunt J, Huijnen I. Interdisciplinary Care Networks in Rehabilitation Care for Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2021; 10:2041. [PMID: 34068727 PMCID: PMC8126257 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10092041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This systematic review aims to identify what rehabilitation care networks, within primary care or between primary and other health care settings, have been described for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, and what their impact is on the Quadruple Aim outcomes (health; health care costs; quality of care experienced by patients; work satisfaction for health care professionals). Studies published between 1 January 1994 and 11 April 2019 were identified in PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycInfo. Forty-nine articles represented 34 interventions: 21 within primary care; 6 between primary and secondary/tertiary care; 1 in primary care and between primary and secondary/tertiary care; 2 between primary and social care; 2 between primary, secondary/tertiary, and social care; and 2 between primary and community care. Results on impact were presented in 19 randomized trials, 12 non-randomized studies, and seven qualitative studies. In conclusion, there is a wide variety of content, collaboration, and evaluation methods of interventions. It seems that patient-centered interdisciplinary interventions are more effective than usual care. Further initiatives should be performed for interdisciplinary interventions within and across health care settings and evaluated with mixed methods on all Quadruple Aim outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Lamper
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Functioning, Participation & Rehabilitation, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (L.B.); (J.V.); (I.H.)
| | - Laura Beckers
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Functioning, Participation & Rehabilitation, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (L.B.); (J.V.); (I.H.)
| | - Mariëlle Kroese
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| | - Jeanine Verbunt
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Functioning, Participation & Rehabilitation, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (L.B.); (J.V.); (I.H.)
- Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology, Adelante, 6432 CC Hoensbroek, The Netherlands
| | - Ivan Huijnen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Functioning, Participation & Rehabilitation, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (L.B.); (J.V.); (I.H.)
- Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology, Adelante, 6432 CC Hoensbroek, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Effects of a 12-week home exercise therapy program on pain and neuromuscular activity in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2020; 140:1985-1992. [PMID: 32728976 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03543-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a 12-week home exercise therapy program on pain, function and neuromuscular activity of the vastus medialis and vastus lateralis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome were treated with a 12-week online home exercise program. The primary outcomes of pain and function were assessed at the 12-week follow-up using the Visual Analog Scale and Kujala Score, respectively. Secondary outcomes were the muscle onset time and the ratio of vastus medialis and vastus lateralis during different daily activities. RESULTS After 12 weeks, patients showed significant (p < 0.05) improvements of 27 points on the Visual Analog Scale and 10 points on Kujala Score. Differences in pre-post comparison regarding both temporal and amplitude-related neurophysiological differences between the vastus medialis and lateralis were only found when the subjects were divided into groups of different electromyographic patterns. Then changes in the pre-post comparison were particularly evident in the patient group with a delayed vastus medialis onset and a lower activity of the vastus medialis compared to the VL. CONCLUSION Pain and function improved significantly after a home exercise therapy program in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. In addition, patients with a delayed onset or reduced activity of the vastus medialis compared to the vastus lateralis experienced a reduction in this imbalance.
Collapse
|
13
|
Which Interventions Enhance Pain Self-efficacy in People With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain? A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials, Including Over 12 000 Participants. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020; 50:418-430. [PMID: 32736497 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To find out which interventions enhance pain self-efficacy in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain and to evaluate the reporting of interventions designed to enhance pain self-efficacy. DESIGN Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, PEDro, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception up to September 2019. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials evaluating pain self-efficacy as a primary or secondary outcome in chronic musculoskeletal pain. DATA SYNTHESIS We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to evaluate the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence, respectively. RESULTS Sixty randomized controlled trials were included (12 415 participants). There was a small effect of multicomponent, psychological, and exercise interventions improving pain self-efficacy at follow-ups of 0 to 3 months, a small effect of exercise and multicomponent interventions enhancing pain self-efficacy at follow-ups of 4 to 6 months, and a small effect of multicomponent interventions improving pain self-efficacy at follow-ups of 7 to 12 months. No interventions improved pain self-efficacy after 12 months. Self-management interventions did not improve pain self-efficacy at any follow-up time. Risk of bias, the nature of the control group, and the instrument to assess pain self-efficacy moderated the effects of psychological therapies at follow-ups of 7 to 12 months. The certainty of the evidence for all included interventions was low, due to serious risk of bias and indirectness. No trial reported the intervention in sufficient detail to allow full replication. CONCLUSION There was low-quality evidence of a small effect of multicomponent exercise and psychological interventions improving pain self-efficacy in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020;50(8):418-430. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.9319.
Collapse
|
14
|
Hewitt S, Sephton R, Yeowell G. The Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions in the Management of Musculoskeletal Conditions: Systematic Literature Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e15617. [PMID: 32501277 PMCID: PMC7305565 DOI: 10.2196/15617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Musculoskeletal conditions are the second greatest contributor to disability worldwide and have significant individual, societal, and economic implications. Due to the growing burden of musculoskeletal disability, an integrated and strategic response is urgently required. Digital health interventions provide high-reach, low-cost, readily accessible, and scalable interventions for large patient populations that address time and resource constraints. Objective This review aimed to investigate if digital health interventions are effective in reducing pain and functional disability in patients with musculoskeletal conditions. Methods A systematic review was undertaken to address the research objective. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews before commencement of the study. The following databases were searched: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Scopus from January 1, 2000, to November 15, 2019, using search terms and database specific−medical subject headings terms in various combinations appropriate to the research objective. Results A total of 19 English language studies were eligible for inclusion. Of the 19 studies that assessed musculoskeletal pain, 9 reported statistically significant reductions following digital intervention. In all, 16 studies investigated functional disability; 10 studies showed a statistically significant improvement. Significant improvements were also found in a range of additional outcomes. Due to the heterogeneity of the results, a meta-analysis was not feasible. Conclusions This review has demonstrated that digital health interventions have some clinical benefits in the management of musculoskeletal conditions for pain and functional disability. Digital health interventions have the potential to contribute positively toward reducing the multifaceted burden of musculoskeletal conditions to the individual, economy, and society. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42018093343; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=93343
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Hewitt
- St Helens Therapy Department, North West Boroughs Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Merseyside, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Sephton
- St Helens Therapy Department, North West Boroughs Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Merseyside, United Kingdom
| | - Gillian Yeowell
- Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Avellanet M, Boada-Pladellorens A, Perrot JC, Loro L, Rodrigo Cansado L, Monterde D, Romagosa J, Gea E. Comparative Study of Postural Garment Versus Exercises for Patients With Nonspecific Cervical Pain: Protocol for a Randomized Crossover Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9:e14807. [PMID: 32297876 PMCID: PMC7193442 DOI: 10.2196/14807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Revised: 12/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among health care professionals. Posture is an essential point to be addressed for health care professionals with musculoskeletal disorders. Cervical pain can result from several conditions. Treatment should include posture modification and home exercise. OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare a new postural garment (Posture Plus Force; Medi, Bayreuth, Germany) with exercises for women with nonspecific cervical pain. The investigators focus on nurses and allied health professionals due to the importance of posture in work-related musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS This randomized crossover clinical trial has a 3-month treatment sequence and a 3-month washout period. Participants will include nurses and allied health professionals 21 to 55 years of age with cervical pain. Participants are allocated at random to two intervention groups: a postural garment (Posture Plus Force) to be worn for 2 to 4 hours per day for 90 days (P+ group) and five physiotherapy sessions (20 minutes each) to learn stretching and strengthening exercises with instructions to continue at home on a daily basis for 90 days (Ex group). The participants in each group will crossover interventions after a 3-month washout period. The primary outcomes are postural control and pain intensity. A static posturography will be performed with a scan (SpinalMouse; Idiag AG, Fehraltorf, Switzerland). The visual analogue scale is a psychometric measuring instrument designed to document cervical pain severity in individual participants. The secondary outcomes are cervical pain-related disability, catastrophizing, the global perceived effect of treatment, and the evaluation of garment comfort. Physical activity is assessed with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Assessment of primary and secondary outcomes is performed at T0 (pre-intervention), T1 (immediately after garment fitting for P+ group), T30, T60, and T90. The same measurements are recorded after the washout period and during the second intervention following the same sequence. All patients are provided with a logbook for compliance recording, over the counter drug use, pain evaluation, and sick leave. Statistical analysis is conducted following intention-to-treat principles and the treatment effects calculated using linear mixed models. RESULTS The study design has been approved by the Ethics Commission of Hospital N Sra de Meritxell, Andorra in March 2017. A total of 32 participants are already enrolled in the study. An extension of the study is planned in a Spanish university hospital to achieve a larger sample. Study results are expected to be published during 2020. CONCLUSIONS The Postural garment is expected to improve cervical pain by enhancing posture. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03560492; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03560492. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/14807.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merce Avellanet
- Rehabilitation Department, Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, Escaldes- Engordany, Andorra
| | - Anna Boada-Pladellorens
- Rehabilitation Department, Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, Escaldes- Engordany, Andorra
| | - Jean-Claude Perrot
- Rehabilitation Department, Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, Escaldes- Engordany, Andorra
| | - Laura Loro
- Rehabilitation Department, Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, Escaldes- Engordany, Andorra
| | - Lidia Rodrigo Cansado
- Rehabilitation Department, Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, Escaldes- Engordany, Andorra
| | - David Monterde
- Department of Health, Catalan Health Institute, Govern de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Romagosa
- Statistics Department, Govern d'Andorra, Andorra la Vella, Andorra
| | - Elvira Gea
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, Escaldes- Engordany, Andorra
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pain-related Self-efficacy Among People With Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools. Clin J Pain 2020; 36:480-494. [PMID: 32080001 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Before an intervention can be implemented to improve pain-related self-efficacy, assessment is required. The aim of the present study was to provide a systematic review on which self-efficacy scales are being used among patients with back pain and to evaluate their psychometric properties. METHODS A systematic search was executed in January 2019 and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2009 checklist served as a guide for conducting the study. Electronic databases included Cinahl, Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, and SportDiscus. Publications in English or German language that focused on the adult patient population with back pain and which provided validation or reliability measures on pain-related self-efficacy were included. RESULTS A total of 3512 records were identified resulting in 671 documents after duplicates were removed. A total of 233 studies were screened full-text, and a total of 47 studies addressing 19 different measures of pain-related self-efficacy were included in the quality analysis. The most commonly used instruments were the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale. All studies reported internal consistency, but many studies lacked other aspects of reliability and validity. CONCLUSIONS Further research should focus on assessing validity and interpretability of these questionnaires, especially in pain-related target groups. Researchers should select questionnaires that are most appropriate for their study aims and the back pain population and contribute to further validation of these scales to best predict future behavior and develop intervention programs. This systematic review aids selection of pain-related assessment tools in back pain both in research and practice.
Collapse
|
17
|
Vilardaga R, Davies PS, Vowles KE, Sullivan MD. Theoretical Grounds of Pain Tracker Self Manager: An Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Digital Intervention for Patients with Chronic Pain. JOURNAL OF CONTEXTUAL BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE 2020; 15:172-180. [PMID: 32269915 PMCID: PMC7141572 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the theoretical basis and design of a novel digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention for people with chronic pain, the Pain Tracker Self Manager (PTSM), which had promising efficacy in a recent pilot trial. METHODS Content development by a multidisciplinary panel of experts in psychiatry, clinical psychology, nursing and social work, with feedback from a group of patients with chronic pain and their providers. Materials included paper-based sketching of a story character, visual metaphors, and a series of stories designed to deliver the theory-based components of our behavioral intervention. RESULTS This development and design process resulted in 4 digitally delivered clinical modules that combine visual and verbal cues. In addition, it generated a series of novel ACT metaphors specifically tailored to patients with chronic pain: Pain: Injury vs. Threat, Life Navigation System, The Fog of Pain, and Get Rhythm. Consistent with ACT theory and the contextual behavioral science framework, PTSM utilized: perspective-taking, values clarification, acceptance strategies, and nursing and psychological care recommendations. DISCUSSION Reports of the design and theoretical basis of digital health interventions are highly needed to increase the rigor of their development process and more progressively advance our body of knowledge. This pilot study developed and tested a series of ACT metaphors that can be readily used by ACT clinicians working with this population. CONCLUSION PTSM is a novel digital ACT intervention for patients with chronic pain with features directly linked to ACT processes and theory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kevin E. Vowles
- School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Island, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moman RN, Hooten WM. The Major Barrier Facing Patients and Clinicians Who Are Interested in Utilization of Electronic and Mobile Health Technologies. PAIN MEDICINE 2019; 21:e243-e246. [DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rajat N Moman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
| | - W Michael Hooten
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Moman RN, Dvorkin J, Pollard EM, Wanderman R, Murad MH, Warner DO, Hooten WM. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Unguided Electronic and Mobile Health Technologies for Chronic Pain—Is It Time to Start Prescribing Electronic Health Applications? PAIN MEDICINE 2019; 20:2238-2255. [DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Electronic (eHealth) and mobile (mHealth) technologies may be a useful adjunct to clinicians treating patients with chronic pain. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of eHealth and mHealth interventions that do not require clinician contact or feedback on pain-related outcomes recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) guidelines in adults with chronic pain.
Methods
We searched four databases and included English language randomized controlled trials of ambulatory adults with chronic pain from January, 1 2000, to January 31, 2018, with interventions that are independent of clinician contact or feedback. In the meta-analysis, outcomes were assessed at short- (three months or less), intermediate- (four to six months), and long-term (seven or more months) follow-up.
Results
Seventeen randomized controlled trials (N = 2,496) were included in the meta-analysis. Both eHealth and mHealth interventions had a significant effect on pain intensity at short- and intermediate-term follow-up. Similarly, a significant but small effect was observed for depression at short- and intermediate-term follow-up and self-efficacy at short-term follow-up. Finally, a significant effect was observed for pain catastrophizing at short-term follow-up.
Conclusions
eHealth and mHealth interventions had significant effects on multiple short- and intermediate-term outcome measures recommended in the IMMPACT guidelines. Given widespread availability and low cost to patients, clinicians treating patients with chronic pain could consider using eHealth and mHealth interventions as part of a multidisciplinary pain treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajat N Moman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jodie Dvorkin
- Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - E Morgan Pollard
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Robalee Wanderman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David O Warner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - W Michael Hooten
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Picha KJ, Jochimsen KN, Heebner NR, Abt JP, Usher EL, Capilouto G, Uhl TL. Measurements of self-efficacy in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: A systematic review. Musculoskeletal Care 2018; 16:471-488. [PMID: 30238607 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low self-efficacy is a barrier to rehabilitation adherence. Before an intervention can be implemented to improve self-efficacy, assessment is required. It is currently unknown if a standard measure of self-efficacy has been used to assess this in patients with musculoskeletal conditions, specifically for home exercise programmes (HEPs). The aim of the present study was to determine which self-efficacy scales are being used in conjunction with exercise adherence, identify if any scale has been developed to evaluate self-efficacy for HEPs and evaluate their psychometric properties. METHODS Data sources included CINAHL, MEDLINE, Pubmed, PsycInfo, and Sport Discus. Studies had to include patients suffering from a musculoskeletal injury, pain or disorder; a measure of rehabilitation adherence; and patient's self-efficacy. The study population, self-efficacy measurement used, study quality as identified with the Modified Downs and Black checklist, results pertaining to self-efficacy, and level of evidence were extracted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed and 29 articles were included. RESULTS A total of 14 scales assessing self-efficacy were identified but no scale to assess self-efficacy for HEPs was found. Many scales report internal consistency but lack test-retest reliability and validity. CONCLUSIONS The scales identified were specific to condition or tasks, and not applicable for all musculoskeletal patient populations. It is important, both for use in the clinic and for research, that outcome measures used are reliable and valid. Unfortunately, no scale was found to assess self-efficacy for HEPs, which is problematic as self-efficacy is task specific. As HEPs are essential to rehabilitation, there should be a scale designed specifically to assess self-efficacy for this task.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey J Picha
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.,Arizona School of Health Sciences, A. T. Still University, Mesa, Arizona, USA
| | - Kate N Jochimsen
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Nicholas R Heebner
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - John P Abt
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Ellen L Usher
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Gilson Capilouto
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Tim L Uhl
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sullivan M, Langford DJ, Davies PS, Tran C, Vilardaga R, Cheung G, Yoo D, McReynolds J, Lober WB, Tauben D, Vowles KE. A Controlled Pilot Trial of PainTracker Self-Manager, a Web-Based Platform Combined With Patient Coaching, to Support Patients' Self-Management of Chronic Pain. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2018; 19:996-1005. [PMID: 29605691 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2017] [Revised: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 03/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop and pilot test a chronic pain empowerment and self-management platform, derived from acceptance and commitment therapy, in a pain specialty setting. A controlled, sequential, nonrandomized study design was used to accommodate intervention development and to test the efficacy of the PainTracker Self-Manager (PTSM) intervention (Web-based educational modules and outcome tracking combined with tailored patient coaching sessions and provider guidance). Generalized estimating equations evaluated changes over time (baseline, 3 months, 6 months) in pain self-efficacy (primary outcome), chronic pain acceptance (activity engagement and pain willingness), perceived efficacy in patient-provider interactions, pain intensity and interference, and overall satisfaction with pain treatment (secondary outcomes) between intervention (n = 48) and usual care control groups (n = 51). The full study sample (N = 99) showed greater improvements over time (significant Group × Time interactions) in pain self-efficacy and satisfaction with pain treatment. Among study completers (n = 82), greater improvement in activity engagement as well as pain intensity and interference were also observed. These preliminary findings support the efficacy of the PTSM intervention in a pain specialty setting. Further research is needed to refine and expand the PTSM intervention and to test it in a randomized trial in primary care settings. PERSPECTIVE We developed a Web-based patient empowerment platform that combined acceptance and commitment therapy-based educational modules and tailored coaching sessions with longitudinal tracking of treatments and patient-reported outcomes, named PTSM. Pilot controlled trial results provide preliminary support for its efficacy in improving pain self-efficacy, activity engagement, pain intensity and interference, and satisfaction with pain treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Sullivan
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Dale J Langford
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Christine Tran
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Roger Vilardaga
- Center for Addiction Science and Technology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Gifford Cheung
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Daisy Yoo
- Department of Information Science, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Justin McReynolds
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - William B Lober
- Departments of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - David Tauben
- Division of Pain Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kevin E Vowles
- Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
How Can We Best Reduce Pain Catastrophizing in Adults With Chronic Noncancer Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2018; 19:233-256. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2017] [Revised: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 09/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
24
|
Sviridova O, Michaelson P. Predictors for return to work after multimodal rehabilitation in persons with persistent musculoskeletal pain. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.5348/100038d05so2018oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
25
|
Kloek C, Bossen D, de Bakker DH, Veenhof C, Dekker J. Blended Interventions to Change Behavior in Patients With Chronic Somatic Disorders: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e418. [PMID: 29269338 PMCID: PMC5754569 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2017] [Revised: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Blended behavior change interventions combine therapeutic guidance with online care. This new way of delivering health care is supposed to stimulate patients with chronic somatic disorders in taking an active role in their disease management. However, knowledge about the effectiveness of blended behavior change interventions and how they should be composed is scattered. Objective This comprehensive systematic review aimed to provide an overview of characteristics and effectiveness of blended behavior change interventions for patients with chronic somatic disorders. Methods We searched for randomized controlled trials published from 2000 to April 2017 in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Study characteristics, intervention characteristics, and outcome data were extracted. Studies were sorted based on their comparison group. A best-evidence synthesis was conducted to summarize the effectiveness. Results A total of 25 out of the 29 included studies were of high quality. Most studies (n=21; 72%) compared a blended intervention with no intervention. The majority of interventions focused on changing pain behavior (n=17; 59%), and the other interventions focused on lifestyle change (n=12; 41%). In addition, 26 studies (90%) focused on one type of behavior, whereas 3 studies (10%) focused on multiple behaviors. A total of 23 studies (79%) mentioned a theory as basis for the intervention. The therapeutic guidance in most studies (n=18; 62%) was non face-to-face by using email, phone, or videoconferencing, and in the other studies (partly), it was face-to-face (n=11; 38%). In 26 studies (90%), the online care was provided via a website, and in 3 studies (10%) via an app. In 22 studies (76%), the therapeutic guidance and online care were integrated instead of two separate aspects. A total of 26 outcome measures were included in the evidence synthesis comparing blended interventions with no intervention: for the coping strategy catastrophizing, we found strong evidence for a significant effect. In addition, 1 outcome measure was included in the evidence synthesis comparing blended interventions with face-to-face interventions, but no evidence for a significant effect was found. A total of 6 outcome measures were included in the evidence synthesis comparing blended interventions with online interventions, but no evidence for a significant effect was found. Conclusions Blended behavior change interventions for patients with chronic somatic disorders show variety in the type of therapeutic guidance, the type of online care, and how these two delivery modes are integrated. The evidence of the effectiveness of blended interventions is inconsistent and nonsignificant for most outcome measures. Future research should focus on which type of blended intervention works for whom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corelien Kloek
- Tranzo, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.,Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, HU University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Daniël Bossen
- ACHIEVE Centre of Expertise, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dinny H de Bakker
- Tranzo, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.,Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Cindy Veenhof
- Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, HU University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Joost Dekker
- EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sieverink F, Kelders SM, van Gemert-Pijnen JE. Clarifying the Concept of Adherence to eHealth Technology: Systematic Review on When Usage Becomes Adherence. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e402. [PMID: 29212630 PMCID: PMC5738543 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In electronic health (eHealth) evaluations, there is increasing attention for studying the actual usage of a technology in relation to the outcomes found, often by studying the adherence to the technology. On the basis of the definition of adherence, we suggest that the following three elements are necessary to determine adherence to eHealth technology: (1) the ability to measure the usage behavior of individuals; (2) an operationalization of intended use; and (3) an empirical, theoretical, or rational justification of the intended use. However, to date, little is known on how to operationalize the intended usage of and the adherence to different types of eHealth technology. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to improve eHealth evaluations by gaining insight into when, how, and by whom the concept of adherence has been used in previous eHealth evaluations and finding a concise way to operationalize adherence to and intended use of different eHealth technologies. METHODS A systematic review of eHealth evaluations was conducted to gain insight into how the use of the technology was measured, how adherence to different types of technologies was operationalized, and if and how the intended use of the technology was justified. Differences in variables between the use of the technology and the operationalization of adherence were calculated using a chi-square test of independence. RESULTS In total, 62 studies were included in this review. In 34 studies, adherence was operationalized as "the more use, the better," whereas 28 studies described a threshold for intended use of the technology as well. Out of these 28, only 6 reported a justification for the intended use. The proportion of evaluations of mental health technologies reporting a justified operationalization of intended use is lagging behind compared with evaluations of lifestyle and chronic care technologies. The results indicated that a justification of intended use does not require extra measurements to determine adherence to the technology. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review showed that to date, justifications for intended use are often missing in evaluations of adherence. Evidently, it is not always possible to estimate the intended use of a technology. However, such measures do not meet the definition of adherence and should therefore be referred to as the actual usage of the technology. Therefore, it can be concluded that adherence to eHealth technology is an underdeveloped and often improperly used concept in the existing body of literature. When defining the intended use of a technology and selecting valid measures for adherence, the goal or the assumed working mechanisms should be leading. Adherence can then be standardized, which will improve the comparison of adherence rates to different technologies with the same goal and will provide insight into how adherence to different elements contributed to the outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floor Sieverink
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Saskia M Kelders
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
- Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
| | - Julia Ewc van Gemert-Pijnen
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gibson O, Reilly R, Harfield S, Tufanaru C, Ward J. Web-based therapeutic interventions for assessing, managing and treating health conditions in Indigenous people: a scoping review protocol. JBI DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND IMPLEMENTATION REPORTS 2017; 15:2487-2494. [PMID: 29035960 DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-003324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
REVIEW OBJECTIVES/QUESTIONS The objective of the scoping review is to map the international scientific literature on web-based therapeutic interventions (WBTI) used by Indigenous people for assessing, managing and treating health conditions. The focus of this review is WBTIs for a broad range of health conditions, including but not limited to, communicable and non-communicable diseases, mental health conditions (including the broader concept of social and emotional wellbeing), use of harmful substances and gambling.The questions for the scoping review are.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Odette Gibson
- 1Wardliparingga Aboriginal Research Unit, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia 2Infection and Immunity Aboriginal Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia 3Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Calner T, Nordin C, Eriksson M, Nyberg L, Gard G, Michaelson P. Effects of a self-guided, web-based activity programme for patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain in primary healthcare: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain 2017; 21:1110-1120. [DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- T. Calner
- Division of Health and Rehabilitation, Department of Health Sciences; Luleå University of Technology; Sweden
| | - C. Nordin
- Department of Primary Health care; Region Norrbotten; Luleå Sweden
| | - M.K. Eriksson
- Division of Health and Rehabilitation, Department of Health Sciences; Luleå University of Technology; Sweden
- Department of Public Health; Region Norrbotten; Luleå Sweden
| | - L. Nyberg
- Division of Health and Rehabilitation, Department of Health Sciences; Luleå University of Technology; Sweden
| | - G. Gard
- Division of Health and Rehabilitation, Department of Health Sciences; Luleå University of Technology; Sweden
| | - P. Michaelson
- Division of Health and Rehabilitation, Department of Health Sciences; Luleå University of Technology; Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Nordin C, Michaelson P, Eriksson MK, Gard G. It's About Me: Patients' Experiences of Patient Participation in the Web Behavior Change Program for Activity in Combination With Multimodal Pain Rehabilitation. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e22. [PMID: 28100440 PMCID: PMC5288562 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2016] [Revised: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 12/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients’ participation in their health care is recognized as a key component in high-quality health care. Persons with persistent pain are recommended treatments with a cognitive approach from a biopsychosocial explanation of pain, in which a patient’s active participation in their rehabilitation is in focus. Web-based interventions for pain management have the potential to increase patient participation by enabling persons to play a more active role in rehabilitation. However, little is known about patients’ experiences of patient participation in Web-based interventions in clinical practice. Objective The objective of our study was to explore patients’ experiences of patient participation in a Web Behavior Change Program for Activity (Web-BCPA) in combination with multimodal rehabilitation (MMR) among patients with persistent pain in primary health care. Methods Qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 women and 4 men, with a mean age of 45 years. Data were analyzed with qualitative content analysis. Results One theme, “It’s about me,” and 4 categories, “Take part in a flexible framework of own priority,” “Acquire knowledge and insights,” “Ways toward change,” and “Personal and environmental conditions influencing participation,” were developed. Patient participation was depicted as being confirmed in an individualized and structured rehabilitation framework of one’s own choice. Being confirmed was fundamental to patient participation in the interaction with the Web-BCPA and with the health care professionals in MMR. To acquire knowledge and insights about pain and their life situation, through self-reflection in the solitary work in the Web-BCPA and through feedback from the health care professionals in MMR, was experienced as patient participation by the participants. Patient participation was described as structured ways to reach their goals of behavior change, which included analyzing resources and restrictions, problem solving, and evaluation. The individual’s emotional and cognitive resources and restrictions, as well as health care professionals and significant others’ attitudes and behavior influenced patient participation in the rehabilitation. To some extent there were experiences of restrained patient participation through the great content of the Web-BCPA. Conclusions Patient participation was satisfactory in the Web-BCPA in combination with MMR. The combined treatment was experienced to increase patient participation in the rehabilitation. Being confirmed through self-identification and finding the content of the Web-BCPA trustworthy was emphasized. Patient participation was experienced as a learning process leading to new knowledge and insights. Higher user control regarding the timing of the Web-BCPA and therapist guidance of the content may further increase patient participation in the combined treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catharina Nordin
- Department of Primary Health Care, Region Norrbotten, Piteå, Sweden.,Department of Health Science, Division of Health and Rehabilitation, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
| | - Peter Michaelson
- Department of Health Science, Division of Health and Rehabilitation, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
| | - Margareta K Eriksson
- Department of Health Science, Division of Health and Rehabilitation, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.,Department of Public Health, Region Norrbotten, Luleå, Sweden
| | - Gunvor Gard
- Department of Health Science, Division of Health and Rehabilitation, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|