Diagnosis of gastric cancer with MDCT using the water-filling method and multiplanar reconstruction: CT-histologic correlation

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline)

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area. Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version. Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Ultra-high resolution computed tomography with deep-learning-reconstruction: diagnostic ability in the assessment of gastric cancer and the depth of invasion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the image quality of ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) images reconstructed using an improved deep-learning-reconstruction (DLR) method. Additionally, we assessed the utility of U-HRCT in visualizing gastric wall structure, detecting gastric cancer, and determining the depth of invasion.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with resected gastric cancer who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced U-HRCT were included. The image quality of U-HRCT reconstructed using three different methods (standard DLR [AiCE], improved DLR-AiCE-Body Sharp [improved AiCE-BS], and hybrid-IR [AIDR3D]) was compared. Visualization of the gastric wall's three-layered structure in four regions and the visibility of gastric cancers were compared between U-HRCT and conventional HRCT (C-HRCT). The diagnostic ability of U-HRCT with the improved AiCE-BS for determining the depth of invasion of gastric cancers was assessed using postoperative pathology specimens.

RESULTS

The mean noise level of U-HRCT with the improved AiCE-BS was significantly lower than that of the other two methods (p < 0.001). The overall image quality scores of the improved AiCE-BS images were significantly higher (p < 0.001). U-HRCT demonstrated significantly better conspicuity scores for the three-layered structure of the gastric wall than C-HRCT in all regions (p < 0.001). In addition, U-HRCT was found to have superior visibility of gastric cancer in comparison to C-HRCT (p < 0.001). The correct diagnostic rates for determining the depth of invasion of gastric cancer using C-HRCT and U-HRCT were 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

U-HRCT reconstructed with the improved AiCE-BS provides clearer visualization of the three-layered gastric wall structure than other reconstruction methods. It is also valuable for detecting gastric cancer and assessing the depth of invasion.

CT Imaging as a Single Modality for Clinical Staging of Gastric Cancer in Limited Resource Centers: A Retrospective Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer disproportionately impacts populations in resource-limited settings. Within a safety-net network, we assessed the utility of computed tomography (CT) as a single staging modality.

METHODS

We utilized a clinical database of gastric cancer patients treated within the Los Angeles County safety-net hospital system from 2016 to 2023 in conjunction with retrospective imaging review by certified radiologists. We assessed agreement between clinical and pathological staging for patients who underwent curative gastrectomy using the Kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

Of 107 patients with available CT imaging, 43.9% (n = 47) were staged with CT as a single modality. Most tumors displayed infiltrating (75%) or diffuse (28%) morphology, 41% displayed adequate gastric distention and regional lymphadenopathy was common (68%). Twenty-nine patients underwent curative gastrectomy. Overall agreement was minimal (κ = 0.29, 95% CI [0.071-0.51], p = 0.022), weak for T3/T4 tumors (κ = 0.50, 95% CI [0.17-0.82], p < 0.01), and weak for Hispanic/Latino patients (κ = 0.47, 95% CI [0.19-0.76], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

There was minimal agreement between clinical and pathologic staging when assessing clinical stage by CT imaging alone, suggesting that CT is not adequate as a single modality staging tool. While every effort should be made to obtain multimodal staging, larger studies are warranted to improve CT imaging protocols for staging in resource-limited settings.

Value of orthogonal axial MR images in preoperative T staging of gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the value of orthogonal axial images (OAI) of MRI in gastric cancer T staging.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 133 patients (median age, 63 [range, 24-85] years) with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent both CT and MRI followed by surgery. MRI lacking or incorporating OAI and CT images were evaluated, respectively. Diagnostic performance (accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity) for each T stage, overall diagnostic accuracy and rates of over- and understaging were quantified employing pathological T stage as a reference standard. The McNemar's test was performed to compare the overall accuracy.

RESULTS

Among patients with pT1-pT4 disease, MRI with OAI (accuracy: 88.7-94.7%, sensitivity: 66.7-93.0%, specificity: 91.5-100.0%) exhibited superior diagnostic performance compared to MRI without OAI (accuracy: 81.2-88.7%, sensitivity: 46.2-83.1%, specificity: 85.5-99.1%) and CT (accuracy: 88.0-92.5%, sensitivity: 53.3-90.1%, specificity: 88.7-98.1%). The overall accuracy of MRI with OAI was significantly higher (83.5%) than that of MRI without OAI (67.7%) (p < .001). However, there was no significant difference in the overall accuracy of MRI with OAI and CT (78.9%) (p = .35). The over- and understaging rates of MRI with OAI (12.0, 4.5%) were lower than those of MRI without OAI (21.8, 10.5%) and CT (12.8, 8.3%).

CONCLUSION

OAI play a pivotal role in the T staging of gastric cancer. MRI incorporating OAI demonstrated commendable performance for gastric cancer T-staging, with a slight tendency toward its superiority over CT.

Does the ypTNM-stage adequately predict long-term survival rates in gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical resection?

BACKGROUND

Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for resectable gastric cancer, the prognostic adequacy of the UICC staging system needs to be investigated. In particular to explore whether the ypTNM curves for radically resected gastric cancer patients receiving NAC follow the stage-matched survival curves of radically resected chemo-naïve patients (pTNM). Further, to disclose any interaction between the TNM-response mode to NAC and stage-specific survival rates, i.e., whether survival for a particular pathological disease stage was dependent on whether this was reached through a downstaging or as stable disease following NAC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study on radically resected patients ≤ 75 years of age with gastric adenocarcinoma stages I-III diagnosed during 2001-2016. The patients constitute two population-based cohorts; the SURG-group with n = 121 patients treated before 2007 when NAC was introduced, and the NAC-group with n = 126 patients diagnosed since early 2007, receiving NAC and subsequent radical resection.

RESULTS

Long-term survival rates were similar when specific ypTNM-stages were compared to their corresponding pTNM chemo-naïve counterparts. The dichotomised N0 vs. N + had a substantial impact on the long-term survival rates in both groups, however, no discrepancy in long-term survival rates between pN0 vs. ypN0, and pN + vs. ypN + was found. The pathological stage determined long-term survival rates irrespective of the baseline disease stage, as no interaction between the response mode and stage-specific survival rates was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival curves for specific ypTNM-stages following NAC did not differ from the corresponding survival curves of their chemo-naïve pTNM counterparts. The interpretation is that NAC affected the gastric cancer, lymph nodes, and micrometastases, in such a way that the final ypTNM-stage provided similar prognostic information as the chemo-naïve pTNM-stages. Survival rates were contingent on the final ypTNM-stages alone, and not influenced by the response mode to reach that particular disease stage, or predetermined by the original clinical TNM-stage.

Response Evaluation after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

The method of response evaluation following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in resectable gastric cancer has been widely debated. An essential prerequisite is the ability to stratify patients into subsets of different long-term survival rates based on the response mode. Histopathological measures of regression have their limitations, and interest resides in CT-based methods that can be used in everyday settings.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based study (2007-2016) on 171 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who were receiving NAC. Two methods of response evaluation were investigated: a strict radiological procedure using RECIST (downsizing), and a composite radiological/pathological procedure comparing the initial radiological TNM stage to the pathological ypTNM stage (downstaging). Clinicopathological variables that could predict the response were searched for, and correlations between the response mode and long-term survival rates were assessed.

RESULTS

RECIST failed to identify half of the patients progressing to metastatic disease, and it was unable to assign patients to subsets with different long-term survival rates based on the response mode. However, the TNM stage response mode did achieve this objective. Following re-staging, 48% (78/164) were downstaged, 15% (25/164) had an unchanged stage, and 37% (61/164) were upstaged. A total of 9% (15/164) showed a histopathological complete response. The 5-year overall survival rate was 65.3% (95% CI 54.7-75.9%) for TNM downstaged cases, 40.0% (95% CI 20.8-59.2%) for stable disease, and 14.8% (95% CI 6.0-23.6%) for patients with TNM progression, p < 0.001. In a multivariable ordinal regression model, the Lauren classification and tumor site were the only significant determinants of the response mode.

CONCLUSIONS

Downsizing, as a method for evaluating the response to NAC in gastric cancer, is discouraged. TNM re-staging by comparing the baseline radiological CT stage to the pathological stage following NAC is suggested as a useful method that may be used in everyday situations.

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.

The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel plus S-1(PTXS) has shown definite efficacy for advanced gastric cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) are unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) PTXS and oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) regime for patients with LAGC.

METHODS

A total of 103 patients with LAGC (cT3/4NanyM0/x) who were treated with three cycles of neoadjuvant SOX regimen (n = 77) or PTXS regimen (n = 26) between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled in this study. NAC-related clinical response, pathological response, postoperative complication, and overall survival were analyzed between the groups.

RESULTS

The baseline data did not differ significantly between both groups. After NAC, the disease control rate of the SOX group (94.8%) was comparable with that of the PTXS group (92.3%) (p = 0.641). Twenty-three cases (29.9%) in the SOX group and 10 cases (38.5%) in the PTX group got the descending stage with no statistical difference (p = 0.417). No significant differences were observed in the overall pathological response rate and the overall postoperative complication rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). There were also no differences between groups in terms of 5-year overall and disease-free survival (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The validity of NAC PTXS was not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer in terms of treatment response and overall survival. PTXS regimen could be expected to be ideal neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with LAGC and should be adopted for the test arm of a large randomized controlled trial.

Gastric hydrodistension CT versus CT without gastric distension in preoperative TN staging of gastric carcinoma: analysis of single-center cancer registry

Accurate staging of gastric cancer is essential for the selection and optimization of therapy. Hydrodistension of the stomach is recommended to improve the accuracy of preoperative staging with contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). This study compares the performance of contrast-enhanced gastric water distension versus a nondistension MDCT protocol for T and N staging and serosal invasion in comparison to surgical histopathology. After propensity score matching, 86 patients in each group were included for analysis. The overall accuracy of distension versus nondistension group in T staging was 45% (95% CI 35-56) and 55% (95% CI 44-65), respectively (p = 0.29). There was no difference in the sensitivity and specificity in individual T staging and assessment of serosal invasion (all p > 0.41). Individual stage concordance with pathology was not significantly different (all p > 0.41). The overall accuracy of N staging was the same for distension and nondistension groups (51% [95% CI 40-62]). The majority of N0 staging (78-81%) were correctly staged, whereas N3 staging cases (63-68%) were predominantly understaged. In summary, there was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance of individual TN staging and assessment of serosal invasion using MDCT with or without gastric water distension.

Assessment of gastric wall structure using ultra-high-resolution computed tomography

PURPOSE

To evaluate the image quality of ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) in the comparison among four different reconstruction methods, focusing on the gastric wall structure, and to compare the conspicuity of a three-layered structure of the gastric wall between conventional HRCT (C-HRCT) and U-HRCT.

METHOD

Our retrospective study included 48 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced U-HRCT. Quantitative analyses were performed to compare image noise of U-HRCT between deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) and other three methods (filtered back projection: FBP, hybrid iterative reconstruction: Hybrid-IR, and Model-based iterative reconstruction: MBIR). The mean overall image quality scores were also compared between the DLR and other three methods. In addition, the mean conspicuity scores for the three-layered structure of the gastric wall at five regions were compared between C-HRCT and U-HRCT.

RESULTS

The mean noise of U-HRCT with DLR was significantly lower than that with the other three methods (P < 0.001). The mean overall image quality scores with DLR images were significantly higher than those with the other three methods (P < 0.001). Regarding the comparison between C-HRCT and U-HRCT, the mean conspicuity scores for the three-layered structure of the gastric wall on U-HRCT were significantly better than those on C-HRCT in the fornix (5 [5-5] vs. 3.5 [3-4], P < 0.001), body (4 [3.25-5] vs. 4 [3-4], P = 0.039), angle (5 [4-5] vs. 3 [2-4], P < 0.001), and antral posterior (4 [3.25-5] vs. 2 [2-4], P < 0.001), except for antral anterior (4 [3-5] vs. 3 [3-4], P = 0.230) CONCLUSION: U-HRCT using DLR improved the image noise and overall image quality of the gastric wall as well as the conspicuity of the three-layered structure, suggesting its utility for the evaluation of the anatomical details of the gastric wall structure.

The value of restaging CT following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer. A population-based study

Background

Response evaluation following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in gastric cancer is debated. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of UICC-downstaging as mode of response evaluation following a MAGIC-style regimen of NAC.

Methods

Retrospective, population-based study on consecutive patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma receiving NAC from 2007 to 2016. CT-scan was obtained at diagnosis (rTNM) and repeated following NAC (yrTNM) to evaluate response in terms of downstaging. Further, yrTNM stage was crosstabulated to pathologic stage (ypTNM) to depict correlation between radiologic and pathologic assessment.

Results

Of 171 patients receiving NAC, 169 were available for response evaluation. For TNM-stages, 43% responded, 50% had stable disease and 7% progressed at CT. Crosstabulating yrTNM stage to ypTNM stage, 24% had concordant stages, with CT overstaging 38% and understaging 38% of the tumours, Cohen kappa ƙ = 0,06 (95%CI 0.004–0.12). Similar patterns of discordance were found for T-stages and N-stages separately. For M-category, restaging CT detected 12 patients with carcinomatosis, with an additional 14 diagnosed with carcinomatosis only at operation. No patient developed parenchymal or extra abdominal metastases, and none developed locally non-resectable tumour during delivery of NAC. Restaging CT with response evaluation was not able to stratify patients into groups of different long-term survival rates based on response mode.

Conclusions

Routine CT-scan following NAC is of limited value. Accuracy of CT staging compared to final pathologic stage is poor, and radiologic downstaging as measure of response evaluation is unreliable and unable to discriminate long-term survival rates based on response mode.

Application of preoperative artificial neural network based on blood biomarkers and clinicopathological parameters for predicting long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Because of the powerful abilities of self-learning and handling complex biological information, artificial neural network (ANN) models have been widely applied to disease diagnosis, imaging analysis, and prognosis prediction. However, there has been no trained preoperative ANN (preope-ANN) model to preoperatively predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC).

AIM

To establish a neural network model that can predict long-term survival of GC patients before surgery to evaluate the tumor condition before the operation.

METHODS

The clinicopathological data of 1608 GC patients treated from January 2011 to April 2015 at the Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were randomly divided into a training set (70%) for establishing a preope-ANN model and a testing set (30%). The prognostic evaluation ability of the preope-ANN model was compared with that of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th edition) clinical TNM (cTNM) and pathological TNM (pTNM) staging through the receiver operating characteristic curve, Akaike information criterion index, Harrell's C index, and likelihood ratio chi-square.

RESULTS

We used the variables that were statistically significant factors for the 3-year overall survival as input-layer variables to develop a preope-ANN in the training set. The survival curves within each score of the preope-ANN had good discrimination (P < 0.05). Comparing the preope-ANN model, cTNM, and pTNM in both the training and testing sets, the preope-ANN model was superior to cTNM in predictive discrimination (C index), predictive homogeneity (likelihood ratio chi-square), and prediction accuracy (area under the curve). The prediction efficiency of the preope-ANN model is similar to that of pTNM.

CONCLUSION

The preope-ANN model can accurately predict the long-term survival of GC patients, and its predictive efficiency is not inferior to that of pTNM stage.

Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and computed tomography findings between signet ring cell carcinoma and nonsignet ring cell carcinoma in early and advanced gastric cancer

Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) of the stomach is a histological type based on microscopic characteristics. SRC's clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis are still controversial. Our study is to describe the clinicopathological features and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings of patients with SRC of the stomach in comparison with nonsignet ring cell adenocarcinoma (NSRC). We retrospectively analyzed data from 241 patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy, including 62 SRC and 179 NSRC. Clinicopathological outcomes and MDCT findings were evaluated, and we investigated whether these variables were correlated with histopathological type. In early gastric carcinoma, patients with SRC were younger (50.2 vs. 60.2 years; P = 0.000) and more likely to be observed in the middle and lower third stomach (P = 0.010). Early SRC had a tendency to be confined to the mucosa (82.1%). There were significant differences in degree of enhancement between early SRC and NSRC on MDCT imaging (P < 0.001). In advanced gastric carcinoma, SRC was more likely to be stage T3‐4 (100%). SRC patients had thicker tumors (P = 0.001) and a higher frequency of diffusely infiltrative gross appearance (P < 0.001). SRC was more likely to have high‐degree contrast enhancement than were NSRC (P = 0.001). The maximal diameter of SRC tumor on MDCT imaging correlated with lymph node metastasis (sensitivity 93.9%, specificity 74.1%) and serosal invasion (sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 78.0%) of SRC. In conclusion, SRC differs significantly from NSRC in clinicopathological features at presentation. MDCT could help differentiate advanced gastric SRC from NSRC based on the thickened stomach wall, high‐degree contrast enhancement, and a higher frequency of diffusely infiltrative gross appearance, particularly in combination.

A Fast 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reconstruction for Surgical Planning of Uterine Myomectomy

BACKGROUND

Uterine myoma is the most common benign gynecologic tumor in reproductive-aged women. During myomectomy for women who want to preserve fertility, it is advisable to detect and remove all myomas to decrease the risk of additional surgery. However, finding myomas during surgery is often challenging, especially for deep-seated myomas. Therefore, three-dimensional (3D) preoperative localization of myomas can be helpful for the surgical planning for myomectomy. However, the previously reported manual 3D segmenting method takes too much time and effort for clinical use. The objective of this study was to propose a new method of rapid 3D visualization of uterine myoma using a uterine template.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance images were listed according to the slide spacing on each plane of the multiplanar reconstruction, and images that were determined to be myomas were selected by simply scrolling the mouse down. By using the selected images, a 3D grid with a slide spacing interval was constructed and filled on its plane and finally registered to a uterine template.

RESULTS

The location of multiple myomas in the uterus was visualized in 3D and this proposed method is over 95% faster than the existing manual-segmentation method. Not only the size and location of the myomas, but also the shortest distance between the uterine surface and the myomas, can be calculated. This technique also enables the surgeon to know the number of total, removed, and remaining myomas on the 3D image.

CONCLUSION

This proposed 3D reconstruction method with a uterine template enables faster 3D visualization of myomas.

Feasibility of differentiating T3 from T4a gastric cancer in different Lauren classification by determining serosa invasion: Diagnostic performance of high enhanced serosa sign

Objective

To study the value of high enhanced serosa sign on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in differentiating T3 from T4a gastric cancer in different Lauren classification.

Methods

This study included 276 consecutive patients with surgically confirmed pT3 or pT4a gastric cancers. The pre-operative CT images were reviewed by two radiologists blinded. The demonstration of the high enhanced serosa on CT between T3 and T4a was compared with chi-square test. The diagnostic performance of this sign on CT in the differentiation of T4a from T3 in different Lauren classification was calculated.

Results

The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the judgement of serosa invasion using the high enhanced serosa sign on CT was 74.6%, 63.7%, 83.6%, 76.0% and 73.8% by one radiologist and 76.4%, 66.1%, 84.9%, 78.1% and 75.4% by the other radiologist. Compared to the intestinal-type, the sensitivity of the judgement of serosa invasion using the high enhanced serosa sign on CT in diffuse-type was significant higher (80% in both readers), while the specificity trended to be lower (65.9% and 80.5%, respectively). There is no significant difference in the accuracy of diagnosis between intestinal-type and diffuse-type of gastric cancers (the P-values of two radiologists were 0.968, 0.591, respectively). The combination of the high enhanced serosa sign with conventional CT signs is significant different in diagnosis of T3 and T4a (P<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy was increased in both radiologists after the combination. The two readers achieved substantial agreement, with Kappa coefficient of 0.63, P<0.001.

Conclusions

The high enhanced serosa sign on CT is associated with serosa involvement. The sensitivity of the judgement of serosa invasion using this sign on CT in diffuse-type was significant higher than that in intestinal-type.

Decreased stage migration rate of early gastric cancer with a new reconstruction algorithm using dual-energy CT images: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the potential value of advanced monoenergetic images (AMEIs) on early gastric cancer (EGC) using dual-energy CT (DECT).

METHODS

31 EGC patients (19 men, 12 women; age range, 38-81 years; mean age, 57.19 years) were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Conventionally reconstructed polyenergetic images (PEIs) at 120 kV and virtual monoenergetic images (MEIs) and AMEIs at six different kiloelectron volt (keV) levels (from 40 to 90 keV) were evaluated from the 100 and Sn 140 kV dual energy image data, respectively. The visibility and stage migration of EGC for all three image data sets were evaluated and statistically analyzed. The objective and subjective image qualities were also evaluated.

RESULTS

AMEIs at 40 keV showed the best visibility (80.7 %) and the lowest stage migration (35.5 %) for EGC. The stage migration for AMEIs at 40 keV was significantly lower than that for PEIs (p = 0.026). AMEIs at 40 keV had statistically higher CNR in the arterial and portal phases, gastric-specific diagnostic performance and visual sharpness compared with other AMEIs, MEIs and PEIs (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

AMEIs at 40 keV with MPR increase the CNR of EGC and thus potentially lower the stage migration of EGC.

KEY POINTS

• AMEIs benefits from the recombination of low-keV images and medium energies. • AMEIs could receive better CNR results than MEIs. • AMEIs at 40 keV potentially lower the stage migration of EGC.

MDCT imaging of the stomach: advances and applications

The stomach may be involved by a myriad of pathologies ranging from benign aetiologies like inflammation to malignant aetiologies like carcinoma or lymphoma. Multidetector CT (MDCT) of the stomach is the first-line imaging for patients with suspected gastric pathologies. Conventionally, CT imaging had the advantage of simultaneous detection of the mural and extramural disease extent, but advances in MDCT have allowed mucosal assessment by virtual endoscopy (VE). Also, better three-dimensional (3D) post-processing techniques have enabled more robust and accurate pre-operative planning in patients undergoing gastrectomy and even predict the response to surgery for patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for weight loss. The ability of CT to obtain stomach volume (for bariatric surgery patients) and 3D VE images depends on various patient and protocol factors that are important for a radiologist to understand. We review the appropriate CT imaging protocol in the patients with suspected gastric pathologies and highlight the imaging pearls of various gastric pathologies on CT and VE.

Impact of the Cross-Sectional Location of Multidetector Computed Tomography Scans on Prediction of Serosal Exposure in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

The extent of serosal exposure varies depending on the cross-section of the stomach that is viewed, affected by the visceral peritoneum of the omentum. Although multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is the most useful method to predict serosal exposure, the MDCT criteria for such exposure by cross-sectional location remain to be established.

METHODS

The MDCT of gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery, and for whom pathological reports were available, were reviewed by radiologists. The MDCT criteria for invasion depth were divided into five grades: (1) smooth margin; (2) undulating margin; (3) streaky margin within vessels; (4) nodular margin within perigastric vessels; and (5) streaky or nodular margin over the perigastric vessels. The five grades were compared in terms of pathological tumor depth by curvature and wall group.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients of stage ≥ T2 were enrolled. The five MDCT grades correlated with tumor depth (P < 0.001). Exposed serosal lesions of grade 3 (P = 0.031) and 5 (P = 0.030) constituted significantly the largest proportion of wall and curvature cancers, respectively. The accuracy of MDCT in terms of T staging using the five grades was calculated by cross-sectional location. The highest accuracies were associated with curvature- and wall-located tumors (55.1 and 64.3%, respectively) when serosal exposure was graded 5 and 3, respectively. The highest overall accuracy for T staging was 59.2% when the various MDCT criteria were applied by reference to the cross-sectional location.

CONCLUSIONS

The MDCT criteria for serosal exposure vary by the cross-sectional location of the gastric cancer.

Lymph nodes metastasis of gastric cancer: Measurement with multidetector CT oblique multiplanar reformation-correlation with histopathologic results

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the ability of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) oblique multiplanar reformation (MPR) for differentiating metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with gastric cancer.Seventy-nine patients with gastric cancer underwent preoperative computed tomography (CT). One-to-one correlation of LN was made between CT oblique multiplanar reformation and histopathologic slides. Long diameters, short diameters, and short-to-long axis ratios of LNs were evaluated to differentiate metastasis.Short diameters of nodes performed better for diagnosing metastasis than long diameters and short-to-long ratios. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of short diameter were 57.8%, 74.7%, 68.2%, and 0.713, respectively. With different thresholds of short diameters of nodes (No. 8 group >6 mm and other groups >4 mm), total sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy can reach 57.2%, 79.0%, and 70.3%, respectively.MDCT oblique MPR images have certain reference value to distinguish metastasis of LNs in gastric cancer. The diagnostic power for LN metastasis of gastric cancer can be improved by using different threshold for No. 8 group LNs and other groups.

The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Primary Staging of Gastric Cancer

Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the primary staging of gastric cancer in the comparison of ceCT as routine staging method and evaluate influencing parameters of 18F-FDG uptake.

Methods: Thirty-one patients (mean age: 58.9±12.6) who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for primary staging of gastric cancer between June 2011 and June 2012 were included to the study. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings were compared with pathological reports in patients who underwent surgery following PET/CT. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings of primary lesions, lymph nodes and adjacent organs were compared with ceCT findings and pathological reports. Since 6 patients were accepted as inoperable according to 18F-FDG PET/CT and/or ceCT and/or laparotomy and/or laparoscopy findings, pathological confirmation could not be possible.

Results: In the postoperative TNM staging of patients, while 1 (4%), 1 (4%), 4 (16%), 2 (8%), 12 (48%) and 5 (20%) patients were staged as T0, Tis, T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively, 8 (32%), 6 (24%), 6 (24%) and 5 (20%) patients were N0, N1, N2 and N3 respectively. 18F-FDG PET/CT was totally normal in 2 patients. While primary tumors were FDG avid in 27 patients, in 17 and 6 patients FDG uptake was observed in perigastric lymph nodes and distant organs, respectively. Mean SUVmax of FDG avid tumors was calculated as 13.49±9.29 (3.00-44.60). However, SUVmax of lymph nodes was computed as 9.28±6.92 (2.80-29.10). According to sub-analysis of histopathological subtypes of primary tumors, SUVmax of adenocarsinomas was calculated as 15.16 (3.00-44.60), of signet ring cells as 9.90 (5.50-17.70), of adenocarcinomas with signet ring cell component as 11.27 (6.20-13.90) (p=0.721). In the comparison with histopathological examination while ceCT was TP, TN, FN in 23, 1 and 1 patients, 18F-FDG PET/CT was TP, FP, FN in 20, 1 and 4 patients, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPD and NPV of ceCT in the detection of lymph node metastasis was calculated as 83.3%, 75%, 80%, 87.5% and 66.6%, respectively. These parameters for 18F-FDG PET/CT were 64.7%, 100%, 76%, 100% and 57.1%.

Conclusion: Despite lower sensitivity than ceCT, diagnostic power of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer is acceptable. Because of its high PPV, it might be beneficial in the evaluation of patients with suspected lymph nodes. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT seems to be limited in the early stage and signet ring cell carcinomas due to lower 18F-FDG uptake.

Microdissection of Human Esophagogastric Junction Wall with Phase-contrast X-ray CT Imaging

Phase-contrast x-ray imaging using an x-ray interferometer has great potential to reveal the structures inside soft tissues, because the sensitivity of this method to hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen is about 1000 times higher than that of the absorption-contrast x-ray method. In this study, we used phase-contrast X-ray CT to investigate human resected esophagogastric junction. This technology revealed the three-layer structure of the esophagogastric junction wall-mucous, submucosa and muscular layers. The mucous and muscular layers were clearly separated by a loose submucosa layer with a honeycomb appearance. The shape of the mucous and muscular layers was intact. The boundary between the mucous and submucosa layers was distinct, as was the border of the muscular and submucosa layers. The surface of the esophagogastric junction was displayed clearly through 3D reconstruction. The technology might be helpful in the diagnosis of esophagogastric junction lesion, especially for the early adenocarcinoma.

Multidetector computed tomography in the preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma

Objective

To evaluate the role of multidetector computed tomography in the preoperative investigation of tumor invasion depth and lymph node and metastatic involvement according to the TNM classification, in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

Materials and Methods

Fifty-four patients with biopsy-confirmed gastric cancer underwent preoperative staging with 64-channel multidetector computed tomography. Two independent radiologists analyzed the images and classified the findings. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and overall accuracy were calculated for each observer. The interobserver agreement was also evaluated.

Results

The accuracy in the classification of categories T ranged from 74% to 96% for observer 1 and from 80% to 92% for observer 2. The overall accuracy was 70% for both observers. The weighted kappa index was 0.75, consistent with a significant interobserver agreement. The accuracy in the classification of lymph node involvement (category N) ranged from 55% to 79% for observer 1 and from 73% to 82% for observer 2. The evaluation of metastatic involvement showed an overall accuracy of 89.6% for both observers.

Conclusion

64-channel multidetector computed tomography demonstrated clinically relevant accuracy in the preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma as regards invasion depth (T category) and metastatic involvement (M category).

A Longitudinal Computed Tomography Imaging in the Diagnosis of Gallbladder Cancer

Background/Aim. To assess whether the diagnostic power of longitudinal multiplanar reformat (MPR) images is superior to that of conventional horizontal images for gallbladder cancer (GBC). Methods. Between 2006 and 2010, a total of 54 consecutive patients with preoperatively diagnosed gallbladder neoplasms located in gallbladder bed were analyzed. These patients underwent cholecystectomy with resection of the adjacent liver parenchyma. The patients were divided into the GBC group (n = 30) and the benign group (n = 24). MPR images obtained by preoperative multidetector row CT (MDCT) were assessed. Results. Mucosal line was more significantly disrupted in GBC group than that in benign group (93% [28/30 patients] versus 13% [3/24], p < 0.001). Maximum (9.3 [4.2-24.8] versus 7.0 mm [2.4-22.6], p = 0.29) and minimum (1.2 [1.0-2.4] versus 1.3 mm [1.0-2.6], p = 0.23) wall thicknesses on a single MPR plane did not differ significantly; however, the wall thickness ratio (max/min) differed significantly (6.8 [1.92-14.0] versus 5.83 [2.3-8.69], p = 0.04). Partial liver enhancement adjacent to tumor on longitudinal images was more common in GBC (40.0% [12/30 patients] versus 12.5% [3/24], p = 0.03). Mucosal line disruption was the most reliable independent predictor of diagnosis (odds ratio, 8.5; 95% CI, 5.99-28.1, p < 0.001). Conclusion. Longitudinal MPR images are more useful than horizontal images for the diagnosis of GBC.

Investigation of gastric cancers in nude mice using X-ray in-line phase contrast imaging

Background

This paper is to report the new imaging of gastric cancers without the use of imaging agents. Both gastric normal regions and gastric cancer regions can be distinguished by using the principal component analysis (PCA) based on the gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM).

Methods

Human gastric cancer BGC823 cells were implanted into the stomachs of nude mice. Then, 3, 5, 7, 9 or 11 days after cancer cells implantation, the nude mice were sacrificed and their stomachs were removed. X-ray in-line phase contrast imaging (XILPCI), an X-ray phase contrast imaging method, has greater soft tissue contrast than traditional absorption radiography and generates higher-resolution images. The gastric specimens were imaged by an XILPCIs’ charge coupled device (CCD) of 9 μm image resolution. The PCA of the projective images’ region of interests (ROIs) based on GLCM were extracted to discriminate gastric normal regions and gastric cancer regions. Different stages of gastric cancers were classified by using support vector machines (SVMs).

Results

The X-ray in-line phase contrast images of nude mice gastric specimens clearly show the gastric architectures and the details of the early gastric cancers. The phase contrast computed tomography (CT) images of nude mice gastric cancer specimens are better than the traditional absorption CT images without the use of imaging agents. The results of the PCA of the texture parameters based on GLCM of normal regions is (F₁ + F₂) > 8.5, but those of cancer regions is (F₁ + F₂) < 8.5. The classification accuracy is 83.3% that classifying gastric specimens into different stages using SVMs.

Conclusions

This is a very preliminary feasibility study. With further researches, XILPCI could become a noninvasive method for future the early detection of gastric cancers or medical researches.

Gastric cancer staging: EUS and CT

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of death from cancer. Only complete resection of all gross disease with negative microscopic margins (R0 resection) provides a long-term survival benefit, and the overall 5-year relative survival rate is approximately 20%. To improve survival and quality of life, new therapeutic approaches have been introduced.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 277 patients (171 men, 106 women) were included in this analysis. The results from the preoperative EUS and MDCT were compared to the postoperative pathological findings. A radial scanning ultrasonic endoscope was used. In patients with early gastric cancer, especially in cases confined to mucosa, endoscopic resection is performed to avoid unnecessary surgical procedures. To achieve R0 resection for locally-advanced gastric cancer, neoadjuvant treatments have been investigated.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to improve quality of life for both early and locally advanced gastric cancer. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), which is considered to be the most precise method for locoregional staging, was commonly used for differentiating mucosal lesions from submucosal lesions. By contrast, computed tomography (CT) was used to detect the presence of distant metastasis. The difference in accuracy between the < or = 20-mm group and other groups was statistically significant for both EUS and MDCT (P = 0.026 and P = 0.044, respectively).

CONCLUSION

However, recent technological advances with the helical and multi-detector scanners have provided better CT performance.

Upper abdominal gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of gastric cancer: Comparison with two-dimensional multidetector row CT

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of gastric cancer in comparison with that of two-dimensional (2D) multidetector row computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 189 patients with 170 surgically confirmed gastric cancers and 19 patients without gastric cancer, all of whom underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging, and multidetector contrast-enhanced abdominal CT imaging. Two observers independently analysed three sets of images (CT set, conventional MRI set, and combined conventional and DW MRI set). A five-point scale for likelihood of gastric cancer was used. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were evaluated. Quantitative [apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) analyses with Mann-Whitney U-test were conducted for gastric cancers and the nearby normal gastric wall.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity for detection of gastric cancer were significantly higher on combined conventional and DW MRI set (77.8-78.3%; 75.3-75.9%) than the CT imaging set (67.7-71.4%; 64.1-68.2%) or the conventional MRI set (72-73%; 68.8-70%; p < 0.01). In particular, for gastric cancers with pT2 and pT3, the combined conventional and DW MRI set (91.6-92.6%) yielded significantly higher sensitivity for detection of gastric cancer than did the CT imaging set (76.8-81.1%) by both observers (p < 0.01). The mean ADC of gastric cancer lesions (1 ± 0.23 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) differed significantly from that of normal gastric wall (1.77 ± 0.25 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Abdominal MRI with DW imaging was more sensitive for the detection of gastric cancer than 2D-multidetector row CT or conventional MRI alone.

State-of-the-art preoperative staging of gastric cancer by MDCT and magnetic resonance imaging

Gastric cancer is one of the most common and fatal cancers. The importance of accurate staging for gastric cancer has become more critical due to the recent introduction of less invasive treatment options, such as endoscopic mucosal resection or laparoscopic surgery. The tumor-node-metastasis staging system is the generally accepted staging system for predicting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) is a widely accepted imaging modality for the preoperative staging of gastric cancer that can simultaneously assess locoregional staging, including the gastric mass, regional lymph nodes, and distant metastasis. The diagnostic performance of MDCT for T- and N-staging has been improved by the technical development of isotropic imaging and 3D reformation. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was not previously used to evaluate gastric cancer due to the modality’s limitations, the development of high-speed sequences has made MRI a feasible tool for the staging of gastric cancer.

MDCT features in the differentiation of T4a gastric cancer from less-advanced gastric cancer: significance of the hyperattenuating serosa sign

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate CT findings to differentiate between T4a and less advanced gastric cancers.

METHODS

The institutional review board approved this study and waived informed consent. This study included 228 retrospectively identified patients with surgically confirmed gastric cancer (138 T1, 25 T2, 24 T3 and 41 T4a) and who had also undergone pre-operative CT scan. Transverse and multiplanar reconstruction scans were reviewed in consensus by two other blinded radiologists. The following CT findings that differentiate T4a from less advanced cancers were evaluated: nodular or an irregular outer layer of the gastric wall, haziness of the perigastric fat and a hyperattenuating serosa sign. The CT features of T4a and less advanced gastric cancers were compared by means of univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, nodular or an irregular outer layer of the gastric wall, haziness of the perigastric fat and the hyperattenuating serosa sign were significant in differentiation between T4a and less advanced gastric cancers. In addition, nodular or an irregular outer layer of the gastric wall and the hyperattenuating serosa sign were significant in differentiation between T3 and T4a. In multivariate logistic analysis, the hyperattenuating serosa sign was the most significant finding in differentiation between T3 and T4a (odds ratio, 4.210; 95% confidence intervals, 1.581-11.214; p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

The hyperattenuating serosa sign may be a useful CT finding in differentiation between T4a and less-advanced gastric cancers.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The hyperattenuating serosa sign is associated with gastric cancer with invading the serosa and can facilitate planning of the optimal pre-operative evaluation and treatment.

Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response

Gastric carcinoma (GC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Surgical resection is the only cure available and is dependent on the GC stage at presentation, which incorporates depth of tumor invasion, extent of lymph node and distant metastases. Accurate preoperative staging is therefore essential for optimal surgical management with consideration of preoperative and/or postoperative chemotherapy. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with its ability to assess tumor depth, nodal disease and metastases is the preferred technique for staging GC. Endoscopic ultrasonography is more accurate for assessing the depth of wall invasion in early cancer, but is limited in the assessment of advanced local or stenotic cancer and detection of distant metastases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), although useful for staging, is not proven to be effective. Positron emission tomography (PET) is most useful for detecting and characterizing distant metastases. Both MDCT and PET are useful for assessment of treatment response following preoperative chemotherapy and for detection of recurrence after surgical resection. This review article discusses the usefulness of imaging modalities for detecting, staging and assessing treatment response for GC and the potential role of newer applications including CT volumetry, virtual gastroscopy and perfusion CT in the management of GC.

Gastric cancer staging with dual energy spectral CT imaging

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical utility of dual energy spectral CT (DEsCT) in staging and characterizing gastric cancers.

Materials and Methods

96 patients suspected of gastric cancers underwent dual-phasic scans (arterial phase (AP) and portal venous phase (PP)) with DEsCT mode. Three types of images were reconstructed for analysis: conventional polychromatic images, material-decomposition images, and monochromatic image sets with photon energies from 40 to 140 keV. The polychromatic and monochromatic images were compared in TNM staging. The iodine concentrations in the lesions and lymph nodes were measured on the iodine-based material-decomposition images. These values were further normalized against that in aorta and the normalized iodine concentration (nIC) values were statistically compared. Results were correlated with pathological findings.

Results

The overall accuracies for T, N and M staging were (81.2%, 80.0%, and 98.9%) and (73.9%, 75.0%, and 98.9%) determined with the monochromatic images and the conventional kVp images, respectively. The improvement of the accuracy in N-staging using the keV images was statistically significant (p<0.05). The nIC values between the differentiated and undifferentiated carcinoma and between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes were significantly different both in AP (p = 0.02, respectively) and PP (p = 0.01, respectively). Among metastatic lymph nodes, nIC of the signet-ring cell carcinoma were significantly different from the adenocarcinoma (p = 0.02) and mucinous adenocarcinoma (p = 0.01) in PP.

Conclusion

The monochromatic images obtained with DEsCT may be used to improve the N-staging accuracy. Quantitative iodine concentration measurements may be helpful for differentiating between differentiated and undifferentiated gastric carcinoma, and between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes.

Gastric cancer detection using MDCT compared with 2D axial CT: diagnostic accuracy of three different reconstruction techniques

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of different reconstruction techniques using MDCT for gastric cancer detection compared with 2D axial CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During 7 months, we performed CT examinations of 104 consecutive patients with gastric cancer and of a control group composed of 35 patients without gastric disease. All gastric cancer was pathologically proven by endoscopy and surgery. Among 104 patients with gastric cancer, 63 patients had early gastric cancer (EGC). Two radiologists retrospectively and independently interpreted the axial CT and three different reconstruction techniques including multiplanar reformation (MPR), transparent imaging (TI), and virtual gastroscopy (VG), using a commercially available, 3D workstation. They graded the presence or absence of gastric cancer in each image sets using a five-point scale and, if present, they assessed its location. Diagnostic accuracy was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) for both gastric cancer and only EGC. Sensitivity and specificity were also calculated for each image technique. The k statistics were used to determine inter-observer agreement.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy for overall gastric cancer detection for each of the image sets was as follows: 2D axial CT (Az = 0.858); MPR (Az = 0.879); TI (Az = 0.873); and VG (Az = 0.928). VG had significantly better performance than 2D axial CT (p = 0.016). The sensitivity and specificity were as follows: 76.7% and 82.9% in axial CT; 79.6% and 85.7% in MPR; 91.3% and 80% in TI; and 95.1% and 74.3% in VG. In EGC, the diagnostic performance for its detection was as follows: axial CT (Az = 0.777); MPR (Az = 0.811); TI (Az = 0.825); and VG (Az = 0.896). VG had significantly better performance than both 2D axial CT (P = 0.006) and MRP (P = 0.038). The sensitivity and specificity were as follows: 62.9% and 82.9% in axial CT; 67.7% and 85.7% in MPR; 85.5% and 80% in TI; and 91.9% and 74.3% in VG. The inter-observer agreement showed substantial agreement (κ = 0.67-0.75).

CONCLUSION

Among the different reconstruction techniques, VG accurately detects gastric cancer and is especially useful for EGC compared with 2D axial CT.

Prediction of intraoperative bleeding during endoscopic treatment in patients with early gastric cancers: utility of contrast-enhanced MDCT gastrography and the wall-carving image technique

PURPOSE

To assess the ability of the "wall-carving image (WC) technique," which uses vascular images from computed tomography (CT) gastrography, to predict bleeding during endoscopic treatment in patients with early gastric cancers (EGC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the CT enhancement on WC images of 30 patients with EGC who were treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Patients were divided into two groups-a no-bleeding group and a bleeding group-according to the degree of intraoperative bleeding during the ESD. Patient-related variables (age and sex), lesion-related variables (size, location, and morphological type), a procedure-related variable (procedure time), and the CT enhancement on WC images were compared between two groups. To assess the diagnostic performance of the CT findings in the prediction of intraoperative bleeding, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

RESULTS

Lesion location, procedure time, and CT enhancement were all significantly associated with intraoperative bleeding, with p values of 0.046, 0.0007, and 0.0011, respectively. With a cut-off value of 4 or greater indicating positivity for contrast enhancement, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for predicting intraoperative bleeding were 64.3, 93.8, 90.0, and 75.0 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast enhancement of WC was significantly associated with intraoperative bleeding during ESD.

How useful is preoperative imaging for tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging of gastric cancer? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the fundamental curative option for gastric cancer patients. Imaging scans are routinely prescribed in an attempt to stage the disease prior to surgery. Consequently, the correlation between radiology exams and pathology is crucial for appropriate treatment planning.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1998 to December 1, 2009. We calculated the accuracy, overstaging rate, understaging rate, Kappa statistic, sensitivity, and specificity for abdominal ultrasound (AUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) with respect to the gold standard (pathology). We also compared the performance of CT by detector number and image type. A meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

For pre-operative T staging MRI scans had better performance accuracy than CT and AUS; CT scanners using ≥ 4 detectors and multi-planar reformatted (MPR) images had higher staging performances than scanners with <4 detectors and axial images only. For pre-operative N staging PET had the lowest sensitivity, but the highest specificity among modalities; CT performance did not significantly differ by detector number or addition of MPR images. For pre-operative M staging performance did not significantly differ by modality, detector number, or MPR images.

CONCLUSIONS

The agreement between pre-operative TNM staging by imaging scans and post-operative staging by pathology is not perfect and may affect treatment decisions. Operator dependence and heterogeneity of data may account for the variations in staging performance. Physicians should consider this discrepancy when creating their treatment plans.

Surgical approaches to gastric cancer

While the incidence of gastric cancer has declined substantially, it remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Surgical resection offers the best chance for curative treatment. Despite numerous studies, surgical controversies persist including endoscopic resection, extent of gastric resection, degree of lymphadenectomy, and laparoscopic resection. Balancing the benefits with the risks of surgical morbidity and mortality is essential. This review examines these controversies and provides insight into the surgical management of gastric cancer.

T-staging of gastric cancer of air-filling multidetector-row CT: comparison with hydro-multidetector-row CT

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of T-staging of gastric cancer by air-filling multidetector-row CT (air-MDCT) compared with water-filling MDCT (hydro-MDCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred fifteen patients with histologically diagnosed gastric cancer were included in this study. Fifty-eight patients underwent air-MDCT, and the remaining 57 had hydro-MDCT using a 64-channel scanner. Based on the volumetric data of contrast-enhanced MDCT obtained about 75 s after intravenously injecting 525 mg iodine per kilogram patients weight (525 mgI/kg) nonionic contrast material at the rate of 2 ml/s, oblique coronal and oblique sagittal multi-planar reformatted images perpendicular to the stomach wall, including the tumor, were reconstructed on a workstation. Mural invasion of gastric cancer into the gastric wall, as visualized by CT, was classified according to the TNM classification, and the results of T-staging by MDCT were compared with those by pathologic analysis after surgery.

RESULTS

Correct assessment of T-staging by air-CT was achieved in 48 of 58 patients (83%), and that by hydro-MDCT was 49 of 57 patients (86%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the technique in determining the invasion of serosa were 88%, 93%, and 91% for air-CT and 83%, 95%, and 91% for hydro-CT. There were no significant differences between hydro-MDCT and air-MDCT in sensitivity (P=0.73), specificity (P=0.71) and accuracy (P=0.98).

CONCLUSION

Air-MDCT is a very valuable tool in T-staging of gastric cancer as well as hydro-MDCT.

Diagnosis of the invasion depth of gastric cancer using MDCT with virtual gastroscopy: comparison with staging with endoscopic ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to retrospectively evaluate the lesion detection rate of gastric cancer using only virtual gastroscopy generated from MDCT images and the accuracy of invasion depth diagnosis (T staging) using virtual gastroscopy together with contrast-enhanced MDCT with multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) images (virtual gastroscopy with MPR), and to compare the diagnostic performance between virtual gastroscopy with MPR images and endoscopic ultrasound.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The subjects consisted of 175 patients with a total of 186 endoscopically proven gastric cancer lesions. All patients underwent dynamic MDCT (arterial and venous phase) for preoperative staging and underwent surgery or endoscopic treatment. In 129 patients (135 lesions) who were also examined using endoscopic ultrasound, the T staging accuracy was also compared between the two modalities. Two endoscopists independently evaluated the lesion detection rate on virtual gastroscopy images alone and determined the T stage on virtual gastroscopy with MPR images. The T staging included the ability to differentiate T1a from T1b lesions.

RESULTS

The overall lesion detection rate was 67.7% (126/186). The detection rates of T1a, T1b, and T2 or deeper were 37.8% (28/74), 75.0% (39/52), and 98.3% (59/60), respectively, showing statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). The T staging accuracies were 82.2% (111/135) using virtual gastroscopy with MPR images and 83.7% (113/135) using endoscopic ultrasound, showing no statistically significant difference (p = 0.850). The main causes of over- and understaging were an ulcer or ulcer scar and poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas, non-solid type, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Virtual gastroscopy with MPR imaging is a useful modality in the T staging of gastric cancer.

F18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography is not accurate in preoperative staging of gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical benefits of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET/CT) over multi-detector row CT (MDCT) in preoperative staging of gastric cancer.

METHODS

FDG-PET/CT and MDCT were performed on 78 patients with gastric cancer pathologically diagnosed by endoscopy. The accuracy of radiologic staging retrospectively was compared to pathologic result after curative resection.

RESULTS

Primary tumors were detected in 51 (65.4%) patients with (18)F-FDG-PET/CT, and 47 (60.3%) patients with MDCT. Regarding detection of lymph node metastasis, the sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT was 51.5% with an accuracy of 71.8%, whereas those of MDCT were 69.7% and 69.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for a primary tumor with signet ring cell carcinoma was lower than that of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for a primary tumor with non-signet ring cell carcinoma (35.3% vs. 73.8%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Due to its low sensitivity, (18)F-FDG-PET/CT alone shows no definite clinical benefit for prediction of lymph node metastasis in preoperative staging of gastric cancer.

Impact of pretherapeutic routine clinical staging for the individualization of treatment in gastric cancer patients

PURPOSE

The usefulness and prognostic impact of a pretherapeutic clinical staging is still a matter of discussion. However, a pretherapeutic estimation of the prognosis would be essential to adjust the patient's therapy. Our aim was to compare clinical and histopathological staging and to analyze the predictive value of routine clinical staging and its significance for the individualization of treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the data of 368 patients treated with gastric cancer in the University of Heidelberg, Department of Surgery, from January 2001 to June 2009. Pretherapeutic parameters including sex, age, cTNM, grading, Laurén classification, tumor localization, as well as posttherapeutic parameters were analyzed, and their impact for survival was evaluated. Follow-up data was obtained for all patients (2.17% lost to follow-up).

RESULTS

The overall accuracy was 64.1% for pT category, 54.5% for pN category, and 80.3% for M category for the primary resected patients. For the patients treated neoadjuvantly, the overall accuracy was 21.8% for the pT category, 58.0% for the pN category, and 80.0% for the M category. The prognosis was associated to the age (p = 0.017), tumor localization (p < 0.001), grading (p = 0.041), cT category (p < 0.001), cN category (p < 0.001), and cM category (p = 0.001). The multivariate analysis, including pre- and postoperative factors, revealed tumor localization (p = 0.002), cN category (p = 0.019), and metastatic lymph node rate (p < 0.001) as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

The accordance between clinical and histopathological staging is limited, but nevertheless pretherapeutic parameters have a high prognostic impact and could be used for individualized therapy planning. The relevant pretherapeutic prognostic factors can all be determined by routine clinical staging including CT and endoscopy. Consequently pretherapeutic prognostic evaluation and therapy planning seem to be feasible with routine staging methods.

Common primary tumours of the abdomen and pelvis and their patterns of tumour spread as seen on multi-detector computed tomography

BACKGROUND: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has become the main investigation of choice for staging of many cancers. AIM: The purpose of this pictorial review is to discuss the imaging appearances on CT of some of the more common cancers arising within the abdomen and pelvis and to describe their typical sites of local, nodal and haematogenous tumour spread. METHODS: Cancers arising from the stomach, pancreas, colon, kidney, ovary and prostate will be reviewed. RESULTS: Awareness of the characteristic sites of tumour spread is important to allow accurate identification of all sites of disease. CONCLUSION: This will clearly have an impact on both patient management and prognosis.

Detection of early gastric cancer using hydro-stomach CT: Blinded vs unblinded analysis

AIM: To evaluate the difference in diagnostic performance of hydro-stomach computed tomography (CT) to detect early gastric cancer (EGC) between blinded and unblinded analysis and to assess independent factors affecting visibility of cancer foci.

METHODS: Two radiologists initially blinded and then unblinded to gastroscopic and surgical-histological findings independently reviewed hydro-stomach CT images of 110 patients with single EGC. They graded the visibility of cancer foci for each of three gastric segments (upper, middle and lower thirds) using a 4-point scale (1: definitely absent, 2: probably absent, 3: probably present, and 4: definitely present). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting an EGC were calculated. Intraobserver and interobserver agreements were analyzed. The visibility of an EGC was evaluated with regard to tumor size, invasion depth, gastric segments, histological type and gross morphology using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS: The respective sensitivities and specificities [reviewer 1: blinded, 20% (22/110) and 98% (215/220); unblinded, 27% (30/110) and 100% (219/220)/reviewer 2: blinded, 19% (21/110) and 98% (216/220); unblinded, 25% (27/110) and 98% (215/220)] were not significantly different. Although intraobserver agreements were good (weighted κ = 0.677 and 0.666), interobserver agreements were fair (blinded, 0.371) or moderate (unblinded, 0.558). For both univariate and multivariate analyses, the tumor size and invasion depth were statistically significant factors affecting visibility.

CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of hydro-stomach CT to detect an EGC was not significantly different between blinded and unblinded analysis. The tumor size and invasion depth were independent factors for visibility.

Accuracy and factors affecting the outcome of multi-detector computerized tomography urography for bladder tumors in the clinical setting

Purpose

The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of multi-detector computerized tomography urography (MDCTU) for the detection of bladder tumors.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 143 patients who were scanned by use of 64-channel MDCTU and who underwent cystoscopy due to painless hematuria or a clinical suspicion of bladder tumor. We examined the accuracy of MDCTU for the detection of bladder tumors by comparing the results obtained by MDCTU with those obtained by cystoscopy. The associations between tumor characteristics, frequency of transurethral resection (TUR), and bladder volume and detectability of bladder tumors on MDCTU were also analyzed.

Results

Of 143 patients, 50 patients had a history of urothelial carcinomas. In these patients, the sensitivity and specificity of MDCTU were 60.0% and 80.0%, respectively. In 93 patients without previous urothelial carcinomas, the sensitivity and specificity of MDCTU were 86.7% and 96.8%, respectively. Falsely diagnosed cases had a smaller distended bladder volume (p=0.014) and a smaller tumor size (p=0.022) than did true diagnosed cases. The false-negative rate increased when the bladder tumor was located at the bladder neck. In the univariate analysis, the tumor location, size, frequency of TUR, bladder volume, and initial hematuria were associated with detectability by MDCTU (p<0.05).

Conclusions

To improve the accuracy of MDCTU for diagnosing bladder tumors, bladder filling is recommended. Thus, cystoscopy should be considered as a standard diagnostic tool for bladder tumors even in patients with normal MDCTU results, especially in the evaluation of recurrent, bladder neck-located, small, or sessile bladder tumors.

Three-dimensional MDCT for preoperative local staging of gastric cancer using gas and water distention methods: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to compare the T-staging accuracy and lesion detectability of MDCT with gas distention versus water distention according to the surgical and histopathologic findings, for the preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For a 3-month period, 113 consecutive patients (72 men and 41 women; age range, 23-85 years; mean age, 58 years) with 116 surgically confirmed gastric cancers from a single institution were included in our study. All patients had undergone preoperative MDCT with either effervescent granules taken orally (n = 55) or after having drunk 1,000 mL of tap water (n = 58) to create gastric distention. In addition to transverse images, multiplanar reformation images and 3D surface shaded display images were also obtained with gas distention CT, and multiplanar reformation images were obtained with water distention CT. The CT images were retrospectively reviewed by two abdominal radiologists separately with regard to T staging and lesion detectability. The accuracy values were compared between the two methods using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The T-staging accuracy for gastric cancer did not differ significantly between gas distention and water distention CT scans, according to both radiologists (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the staging accuracy values for T1a cancers on gas distention CT scans for radiologists 1 and 2 were also comparable with those of water distention CT scans (91.1% vs 85% for radiologist 1 and 89.3% vs 85% for radiologist 2; p > 0.05). However, the tumor detection rate was significantly higher on gas distention CT scans using 2D and surface shaded display images for both radiologists (94.6% for radiologist 1 and 91.1% for radiologist 2), compared with the rates for water distention CT scans (78.3% and 73.3%) or gas distention CT scans using only 2D images (75.0% and 67.9%) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MDCT using the gas distention technique showed performance comparable to that of the water distention technique for the T staging of preoperative gastric cancer with better lesion detectability.

Efficacy of hydrogastric sonography and spiral Computed Tomography in staging of gastric carcinoma--a comparative study

OBJECTIVE

Accurate preoperative diagnosis and staging of patients with gastric cancer is essential for optimal treatment. The standard of care for staging gastric carcinoma is helical CT. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of hydrogastric sonography (HGS) with that of helical CT in the staging of patients with gastric carcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 42 consecutive patients (29 men and 13 women) diagnosed with gastric carcinoma after endoscopy and biopsy were staged on the basis of TNM classification, preoperatively with HGS and helical CT and postoperatively with histopathologic examination (HPE). The findings of HGS and helical CT were compared with those on HPE with respect to TNM stage.

RESULTS

Regarding T stage, the accuracy of HGS was 78.6% (kappa = 0.68) and that of helical CT was 66.7% (kappa = 0.48). In evaluating the nodal status, the accuracy of HGS was 66.7% (kappa = 0.52) and that of helical CT was 54.6% (kappa = 0.39). Regarding distant metastases, accuracy was the same with HGS and helical CT (accuracy 95.2%, kappa = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with HPE, HGS was found to be more accurate than helical CT for assessment of T and N staging. Sonographic and helical CT were equally accurate for the assessment of M stage.