Segmental enhancement inversion at biphasic multidetector CT: characteristic finding of small renal oncocytoma. Radiology. 2009;252:441-448. [PMID: 19508984 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.12.8616]

Radiomics analysis based on single phase and different phase combinations of radiomics features from tri-phasic CT to distinguish renal oncocytoma from chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate different radiomics models based on single phase and the different phase combinations of radiomics features from 3D tri-phasic CT to distinguish RO from chRCC.

METHODS

A total of 96 patients (30 RO and 66 chRCC) were enrolled in this study. Radiomics features were extracted from unenhanced phase (UP), corticomedullary phase (CMP), and nephrographic phase (NP) CT images. Feature selection was based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO) method. The selected features were used to develop different radiomics models using logistic regression (LR) analysis, including model 1 (UP), model 2(CMP), model 3(NP), model 4(UP+CMP), model 5(UP+NP), model 6(CMP+NP), and model 7(UP+CMP+NP). The radiomics model demonstrating the highest discrimination performance was utilized to construct the combined model (model 8) with clinical factors. A nomogram based on the model 8 was established. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the different models, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used. Delong's test was utilized to assess the statistical significance of the AUC improvement across the models.

RESULTS

Among the seven radiomics models, model 7 exhibited the highest AUC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.69, 0.99), and model 7 demonstrated a significantly superior AUC compared to the other radiomics models (all P < 0.05). The AUC values of radiomics models based on two phases (model4, mode5, mode6) were greater than the models based on single phase (model1, mode2, mode3) (all P < 0.05). Model 3 illustrated the best performance of the three radiomics models based on single phase with an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI 0.57, 099). Model 6 illustrated the best performance of the three radiomics models based on two-phases combination with an AUC of 0.83 (0.66, 0.99). Model 8 achieved an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.83, 1.00) which is higher than those all radiomics models.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics models based on combination of radiomics features from UP, CMP, and NP can be a useful and promising technique to differentiate RO from chRCC. Moreover, the model combining clinical factors and radiomics features showed better classification performance to distinguish them.

"To Be or Not to Be Benign" at Partial Nephrectomy for Presumed RCC Renal Masses: Single-Center Experience with 195 Consecutive Patients

In daily medical practice, an increasing number of kidney masses are being incidentally detected using common imaging techniques, owing to the improved diagnostic accuracy and increasingly frequent use of these techniques. As a consequence, the rate of detection of smaller lesions is increasing considerably. According to certain studies, following surgical treatment, up to 27% of small enhancing renal masses are identified as benign tumors at the final pathological examination. This high rate of benign tumors challenges the appropriateness of surgery for all suspicious lesions, given the morbidity associated with such an intervention. The objective of the present study was, therefore, to determine the incidence of benign tumors at partial nephrectomy (PN) for a solitary renal mass. To meet this end, a total of 195 patients who each underwent one PN for a solitary renal lesion with the intent to cure RCC were included in the final retrospective analysis. A benign neoplasm was identified in 30 of these patients. The age of the patients ranged from 29.9-79 years (average: 60.9 years). The tumor size range was 1.5-7 cm (average: 3 cm). All the operations were successful using the laparoscopic approach. The pathological results were renal oncocytoma in 26 cases, angiomyolipomas in two cases, and cysts in the remaining two cases. In conclusion, we have shown in our present series the incidence rate of benign tumors in patients who have been subjected to laparoscopic PN due to a suspected solitary renal mass. Based on these results, we advise that the patient should be counseled not only about the intra- and post-operative risks of nephron-sparing surgery but also about its dual therapeutic and diagnostic role. Therefore, the patients should be informed of the considerably high probability of a benign histological result.

Diagnostic Performance and Interreader Agreement of the MRI Clear Cell Likelihood Score for Characterization of cT1a and cT1b Solid Renal Masses: An External Validation Study

BACKGROUND. The clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) has been proposed for the noninvasive differentiation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from other renal neoplasms on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), though further external validation remains needed. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of the ccLS version 2.0 (v2.0) for characterizing solid renal masses as ccRCC. METHODS. This retrospective study included 102 patients (67 men, 35 women; mean age, 56.9 ± 12.8 [SD] years) who underwent mpMRI between January 2013 and February 2018, showing a total of 108 (≥ 25% enhancing tissue) solid renal masses measuring 7 cm or smaller (83 cT1a [≤ 4 cm] and 25 cT1b [> 4 cm and ≤ 7 cm]), all with a histologic diagnosis. Three abdominal radiologists independently reviewed the MRI examinations using ccLS v2.0. Median reader sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were computed for predicting ccRCC by ccLS of 4 or greater, and individual reader AUCs were derived. The percentage of masses that were ccRCC was calculated, stratified by ccLS. Interobserver agreement was assessed by the Fleiss kappa statistic. RESULTS. The sample included 45 ccRCCs (34 cT1a, 11 cT1b), 30 papillary renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), 13 chromophobe RCCs, 14 oncocytomas, and six fat-poor angiomyolipomas. Median reader sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for predicting ccRCC by ccLS of 4 or greater were 85%, 82%, and 83% among cT1a masses and 82%, 100%, and 92% among cT1b masses. The three readers' AUCs for predicting ccRCC by ccLS for cT1a masses were 0.90, 0.84, and 0.89 and for cT1b masses were 0.99, 0.97, and 0.92. Across readers, the percentage of masses that were ccRCC among cT1a masses was 0%, 0%, 20%, 68%, and 93% for ccLS of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively; among cT1b masses, the percentage of masses that were ccRCC was 0%, 0%, 32%, 90%, and 100% for ccLS of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Interobserver agreement among cT1a and cT1b masses for ccLS of 4 or greater was 0.82 and 0.83 and for ccLS of 1-5 overall was 0.65 and 0.62, respectively. CONCLUSION. This study provides external validation of the ccLS, finding overall high measures of diagnostic performance and interreader agreement. CLINICAL IMPACT. The ccLS provides a standardized approach to the noninvasive diagnosis of ccRCC by MRI.

Radiomics improves the utility of ADC for differentiation between renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: Preliminary findings

OBJECTIVE

Differentiation between renal oncocytoma (RON) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) remains challenging. We aimed to assess the accurate apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) radiomics features in differentiating these tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included 14 patients with histopathologically proven RON (n = 6) and chRCC (n = 8) who underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Features were extracted from ADC maps. Features with an intraclass correlation coefficient >0.90, an intergroup p < 0.01 and interrater differences with normal distribution underwent agreement and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 6 features qualified for further analysis and Bland-Altman plots revealed acceptable agreement for all. Only 1 first order feature and 5 high order texture features successfully predicted RON with more than 90% sensitivities and specificities more than 80%.

CONCLUSION

Squared mean ADC and certain gray level run length matrix features extracted by radiomics of ADC mapping provide quite high diagnostic precision in terms of distinguishing between RON and chRCC.

Renal Oncocytoma: The Diagnostic Challenge to Unmask the Double of Renal Cancer

Renal oncocytoma represents the most common type of benign neoplasm that is an increasing concern for urologists, oncologists, and nephrologists due to its difficult differential diagnosis and frequent overtreatment. It displays a variable neoplastic parenchymal and stromal architecture, and the defining cellular element is a large polygonal, granular, eosinophilic, mitochondria-rich cell known as an oncocyte. The real challenge in the oncocytoma treatment algorithm is related to the misdiagnosis due to its resemblance, at an initial radiological assessment, to malignant renal cancers with a completely different prognosis and medical treatment. Unfortunately, percutaneous renal biopsy is not frequently performed due to the possible side effects related to the procedure. Therefore, the majority of oncocytoma are diagnosed after the surgical operation via partial or radical nephrectomy. For this reason, new reliable strategies to solve this issue are needed. In our review, we will discuss the clinical implications of renal oncocytoma in daily clinical practice with a particular focus on the medical diagnosis and treatment and on the potential of novel promising molecular biomarkers such as circulating microRNAs to distinguish between a benign and a malignant lesion.

The Incidental Renal Mass- Update on Characterization and Management

Renal masses are commonly encountered on cross-sectional imaging examinations performed for nonrenal indications. Although most can be dismissed as benign cysts, a subset will be either indeterminate or suspicious; in many cases, imaging cannot be used to reliably differentiate between benign and malignant masses. On-going research in defining characteristics of common renal masses on advanced imaging shows promise in offering solutions to this issue. A recent update of the Bosniak classification (used to categorize cystic renal masses) was proposed with the goals of decreasing imaging follow-up in likely benign cystic masses, and therefore avoiding unnecessary surgical resection of such masses.

CT and MRI of small renal masses

Small renal masses are increasingly detected incidentally at imaging. They vary widely in histology and aggressiveness, and include benign renal tumors and renal cell carcinomas that can be either indolent or aggressive. Imaging plays a key role in the characterization of these small renal masses. While a confident diagnosis can be made in many cases, some renal masses are indeterminate at imaging and can present as diagnostic dilemmas for both the radiologists and the referring clinicians. This article will summarize the current evidence of imaging features that correlate with the biology of small solid renal masses, and discuss key approaches in imaging characterization of these masses using CT and MRI.

Aorta-Lesion-Attenuation-Difference (ALAD) on contrast-enhanced CT: a potential imaging biomarker for differentiating malignant from benign oncocytic neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the Aorta-Lesion-Attenuation-Difference on contrast-enhanced CT can aid in the differentiation of malignant and benign oncocytic renal neoplasms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two independent cohorts-an initial (biopsy) dataset and a validation (surgical) dataset-with oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (chRCC) were included in this IRB-approved retrospective study. A region of interest was placed on the renal mass and abdominal aorta on the same CT image slice to calculate an Aorta-Lesion-Attenuation-Difference (ALAD). ROC curves were plotted for different enhancement phases, and diagnostic performance of ALAD for differentiating chRCC from oncocytomas was calculated.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine renal masses (56 oncocytomas, 23 chRCC) were analyzed in the initial (biopsy) dataset. Thirty-six renal masses (16 oncocytomas, 20 chRCC) were reviewed in the validation (surgical) cohort. ALAD showed a statistically significant difference between oncocytomas and chromophobes during the nephrographic phase (p < 0.001), early excretory phase (p < 0.001), and excretory phase (p = 0.029). The area under the ROC curve for the nephrographic phase was 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00-1.00) for the biopsy dataset and showed the narrowest confidence interval. At a threshold value of 25.5 HU, sensitivity was 100 (82.2%-100%) and specificity was 81.5 (61.9%-93.7%). When tested on the validation dataset on measurements made by an independent reader, the AUROC was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.84-1.00) with a sensitivity of 100 (80.0%-100%) and a specificity of 87.5 (60.4%-97.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Nephrographic phase ALAD has potential to differentiate benign and malignant oncocytic renal neoplasms on contrast-enhanced CT if histologic evaluation on biopsy is indeterminate.

Voxel-based whole-lesion enhancement parameters: a study of its clinical value in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from renal oncocytoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare whole-lesion (WL) enhancement parameters to single region of interest (ROI)-based enhancement in discriminating clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from renal oncocytoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this IRB-approved retrospective study, the surgical database was queried to derive a cohort of 94 postnephrectomy patients with ccRCC or oncocytoma (68 ccRCC, 26 oncocytoma), who underwent preoperative multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) between June 2009 and August 2013. CT acquisitions were transferred to a three-dimensional workstation, and WL ROIs were manually segmented. WL enhancement and histogram distribution parameters skewness, kurtosis, standard deviation (SD), and interquartile range (IQR) were calculated. WL enhancement parameters were compared to single ROI-based enhancement using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Oncocytoma had significantly higher WL enhancement than ccRCC in nephrographic (mean, p = 0.02; median, p = 0.03) and excretory phases (mean, p = 0.03; median p < 0.01). ccRCC had significantly higher kurtosis than oncocytoma in corticomedullary (p = 0.03) and excretory phases (p < 0.01), and significantly higher SD and IQR than oncocytoma in all postcontrast phases: corticomedullary (SD, p = 0.02; IQR, p < 0.01), nephrographic (SD, p = 0.01; IQR, p = 0.03), and excretory (SD, p < 0.01; IQR, p < 0.01). When compared to single ROI-based enhancement, WL enhancement alone did not demonstrate a statistical advantage in discriminating between ccRCC and oncocytoma (area under ROC curve of 0.78 and 0.72 respectively), but when combined with histogram distribution parameters (area under ROC curve of 0.86), it did demonstrate a slight improvement.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that voxel-based WL enhancement parameters provide only a slight improvement over single ROI-based enhancement techniques in differentiating between ccRCC and renal oncocytoma.

Quantitative assessment of solid renal masses by contrast-enhanced ultrasound with time-intensity curves: how we do it

PURPOSE

To discuss the evaluation of the enhancement curve over time of the major renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes, oncocytoma, and lipid-poor angiomyolipoma, to aid in the preoperative differentiation of these entities. Differentiation of these lesions is important, given the different prognoses of the subtypes, as well as the desire to avoid resecting benign lesions.

METHODS

We discuss findings from CT, MR, and US, but with a special emphasis on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). CEUS technique is described, as well as time-intensity curve analysis.

RESULTS

Examples of each of the major RCC subtypes (clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe) are shown, as well as examples of oncocytoma and lipid-poor angiomyolipoma. For each lesion, the time-intensity curve of enhancement on CEUS is reviewed, and correlated with the enhancement curve over time reported for multiphase CT and MR.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative differentiation of the most common solid renal masses is important, and the time-intensity curves of these lesions show some distinguishing features that can aid in this differentiation. The use of CEUS is increasing, and as a modality it is especially well suited to the evaluation of the time-intensity curve.

Usefulness of MDCT to Differentiate Between Renal Cell Carcinoma and Oncocytoma: Development of a Predictive Model

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to identify the most useful parameters to differentiate between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and oncocytoma using four-phase CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-seven patients with solid renal lesions who underwent surgery with four-phase preoperative CT evaluation and with pathologic diagnosis of RCC or oncocytoma were included in the study. Features of tumors and the enhancement pattern in the four CT phases were evaluated and analyzed. Logistic regression models were used to assess independent predictors for malignancy.

RESULTS

Histopathologically, 13 tumors were oncocytomas and 84 were RCCs. RCCs were larger (6.20 cm vs 3.21 cm, p = 0.0004) and more often enhanced heterogeneously (66 vs 6, p = 0.02). Lesions that were larger than 4 cm showed a significantly higher risk of malignancy (p = 0.0046). Significant differences were found in intensity of nodule enhancement between the nephrographic and the excretory phases with respect to the unenhanced phase (p = 0.003 and p = 0.0026). At multivariate analysis, parameters that were independent predictors of malignancy were enhancement pattern, with RCCs more often having heterogeneous enhancement than oncocytomas (odds ratio [OR], 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.90), and nodule enhancement in the excretory phase in relation to the unenhanced phase, with RCCs showing lower enhancement (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.97), and a size larger than 4 cm (OR, 4.01; 95% CI, 0.70-23.14).

CONCLUSION

The combination of different CT parameters including lesion size larger than 4 cm, lesion enhancement in the excretory phase in relation to the unenhanced phase, and heterogeneous enhancement pattern helps distinguish RCC from oncocytoma.

Renal Masses: Imaging Evaluation

This article illustrates the imaging characteristics of cystic and solid renal masses, along with a summary of identified imaging criteria that may be of use to differentiate masses that are more likely to be benign from those that are more likely to be malignant. In addition, important features of known or suspected renal cancers that should be identified before treatment are summarized, including staging of renal cancer and RENAL nephrometry. Finally, the imaging appearance of patients following treatment of renal cancer, including after partial or total nephrectomy, thermal ablation, or chemotherapy for metastatic disease, is reviewed.

Active Surveillance for Renal Neoplasms with Oncocytic Features is Safe

PURPOSE

Oncocytomas are benign tumors often diagnosed incidentally on imaging. Small case series have suggested that the growth kinetics of oncocytomas are similar to those of malignant renal tumors. Biopsy material may be insufficient to exclude a diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. We evaluated and compared the growth rates of oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma to improve our understanding of their natural history.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single center, retrospective study of patients diagnosed with lesions suggestive of oncocytoma or chromophobe renal cell carcinoma between 2003 and 2014. The growth rates were estimated using a mixed effect linear model. Patient and lesion characteristics were tested using a similar model for association with growth rate.

RESULTS

Of the 95 lesions (oncocytoma 81, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma 14) included in the analysis 98% were diagnosed on biopsy. The annual growth rate was 0.14 cm and 0.38 cm for oncocytoma (median followup 34 months) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (median followup 25 months), respectively (p=0.5). Baseline lesion size was significantly associated with growth (p <0.001). The majority of oncocytomas (74%) and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (67%) followed up to the 3-year mark had grown. Of these, 8 underwent surgery (6 in the chromophobe renal cell carcinoma group). The initial diagnosis was confirmed in all. Overall 5 patients died, all of nonrenal related causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the majority of oncocytic renal neoplasms will grow with time, surveillance appears to remain safe. Patients opting for this strategy should be made aware that a diagnosis of oncocytoma following biopsy is associated with some degree of uncertainty due to the difficulty of differentiating them from other oncocytic renal neoplasms.

Advances of multidetector computed tomography in the characterization and staging of renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for approximately 90%-95% of kidney tumors. With the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging modalities, more than half of RCCs are detected incidentally, often diagnosed at an early stage. This may allow the planning of more conservative treatment strategies. Computed tomography (CT) is considered the examination of choice for the detection and staging of RCC. Multidetector CT (MDCT) with the improvement of spatial resolution and the ability to obtain multiphase imaging, multiplanar and three-dimensional reconstructions in any desired plane brought about further improvement in the evaluation of RCC. Differentiation of RCC from benign renal tumors based on MDCT features is improved. Tumor enhancement characteristics on MDCT have been found closely to correlate with the histologic subtype of RCC, the nuclear grade and the cytogenetic characteristics of clear cell RCC. Important information, including tumor size, localization, and organ involvement, presence and extent of venous thrombus, possible invasion of adjacent organs or lymph nodes, and presence of distant metastases are provided by MDCT examination. The preoperative evaluation of patients with RCC was improved by depicting the presence or absence of renal pseudocapsule and by assessing the possible neoplastic infiltration of the perirenal fat tissue and/or renal sinus fat compartment.

Diagnostic potential of multidetector computed tomography for characterizing small renal masses

OBJECTIVES

To assess the potential of CT for characterizing small renal tumors.

METHODS

76 patients with <4 cm renal tumors underwent CT examination. The following parameters were assessed: presence of calcifications, densitometry on unenhanced and enhanced scans, washout percentage, urinary tract infiltration, star-shaped scar, and paradoxical effect.

RESULTS

Calcifications were found in 7/56 (12.5%) carcinomas. Clear cell carcinomas were as follows: mean density 183.5 HU (arterial phase), 136 HU (portal phase), and 94 HU (delayed phase), washout 34.3%; chromophobe carcinomas were as follows: mean density 135 HU (arterial phase), 161 HU (portal phase), and 148 HU (delayed phase), washout 28%; papillary carcinomas were as follows: mean density 50.3 HU (arterial phase), 60 HU (portal phase), and 58.1 HU (delayed phase), washout 2.7%. In 2/56 (3.6%) cases urinary tract infiltration was found. Oncocytomas were as follows: mean density 126.5 HU (arterial phase), 147.5 HU (portal phase), and 115.5 HU (delayed phase), washout 28.6%. On unenhanced scans, angiomyolipomas were as follows: density values <30 HU in 12/12 (100%) of cases and on enhanced scans: mean density 78 HU (arterial phase), 128 HU (portal phase), and 80 HU (delayed phase), washout 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intralesional calcifications and urinary tract infiltration are suggestive for malignancy, with the evidence of adipose tissue for angiomyolipomas and a modest increase in density with a reduced washout for papillary carcinomas. The intralesional density on enhanced scans, peak enhancement, and washout do not seem significant for differentiating clear cell, chromophobe carcinomas, angiomyolipomas, and oncocytomas.

Imaging findings of common benign renal tumors in the era of small renal masses: differential diagnosis from small renal cell carcinoma: current status and future perspectives

The prevalence of small renal masses (SRM) has risen, paralleling the increased usage of cross-sectional imaging. A large proportion of these SRMs are not malignant, and do not require invasive treatment such as nephrectomy. Therefore, differentation between early renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and benign SRM is critical to achieve proper management. This article reviews the radiological features of benign SRMs, with focus on two of the most common benign entities, angiomyolipoma and oncocytoma, in terms of their common imaging findings and differential features from RCC. Furthermore, the role of percutaneous biopsy is discussed as imaging is yet imperfect, therefore necessitating biopsy in certain circumstances to confirm the benignity of SRMs.

Imaging spectrum of renal oncocytomas: a pictorial review with pathologic correlation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this pictorial review is to present the imaging spectrum of renal oncocytomas with radiological-pathological correlation.

CONCLUSION

The differences in tumour cellularity (high cellularity or low cellularity with abundant stroma) and haemorrhagic/cystic change contribute to a wide spectrum of imaging findings of renal oncocytomas. Imaging findings substantially overlap those of common subtypes of clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas. Multifocal renal oncocytomas are not rare, and making the diagnosis of oncocytoma with concomitant renal cell carcinoma is difficult. In addition, renal oncocytomas that demonstrate interval growth or develop in the setting of end-stage renal disease may be mistaken for malignancy.

TEACHING POINTS

• High cellular components demonstrate avid arterial enhancement and subsequent washout. • Low cellular components demonstrate gradual subsequent enhancement owing to abundant stroma. • Cystic and hemorrhagic changes may account for lesion heterogeneity in the delayed phase. • Multifocal oncocytomas and oncocytomas coexisting with renal cell carcinoma are not rare. • Renal oncocytomas may demonstrate interval growth.

Diagnostic accuracy of segmental enhancement inversion for the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma using biphasic computed tomography (CT) and multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

OBJECTIVES

Segmental enhancement inversion (SEI) is a controversial imaging finding reportedly specific for the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma. The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate SEI using biphasic CT and multiphase MRI.

METHODS

With research ethics board approval, a retrospective analysis of patients with resection or biopsy of oncocytoma or chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (Ch-RCC) between 2008-2012 was performed. Twenty-four patients with oncocytoma and 13 patients with Ch-RCC underwent CT, while 13 patients with oncocytoma and 10 patients with Ch-RCC underwent MRI. Two blinded radiologists reviewed the CT and MRI studies independently in separate sessions to assess for SEI. A third radiologist established consensus. Interobserver variability was calculated and diagnostic accuracy was compared using ROC and the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

There was no difference in detection of SEI between oncocytoma and Ch-RCC at CT [both readers (p = 0.65, 0.5) and consensus review (p = 0.29)] or MRI [both readers (p = 0.64, 0.74) and consensus review (p = 0.53)]. The interobserver variability at CT (K = 0.28-0.33) and MRI (K = 0.25-0.44) was fair. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of oncocytoma were 21 % and 92 % at CT and 15 % and 90 % at MRI.

CONCLUSION

SEI is not useful for the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma with CT or MRI.

KEY POINTS

• SEI was detected in a minority of renal oncocytomas and chromophobe RCC. • Interobserver agreement for segmental enhancement inversion was only fair. • SEI is not useful for diagnosing renal oncocytoma with CT or MRI.

Solid renal masses: what the numbers tell us

OBJECTIVE

Solid renal masses are most often incidentally detected at imaging as small (≤ 4 cm) localized lesions. These lesions comprise a wide spectrum of benign and malignant histologic subtypes, but are largely treated with surgical resection given the limited ability of imaging to differentiate among them with consistency and high accuracy. Numerous studies have thus examined the ability of CT and MRI techniques to separate benign lesions from malignancies and to predict renal cancer histologic grade and subtype. This article synthesizes the evidence regarding renal mass characterization at CT and MRI, provides diagnostic algorithms for evidence-based practice, and highlights areas of further research needed to drive imaging-based management of renal masses.

CONCLUSION

Despite extensive study of morphologic and quantitative criteria at conventional imaging, no CT or MRI techniques can reliably distinguish solid benign tumors, such as oncocytoma and lipid-poor angiomyolipoma, from malignant renal tumors. Larger studies are required to validate recently developed techniques, such as diffusion-weighted imaging. Evidence-based practice includes MRI to assess renal lesions in situations where CT is limited and to help guide management in patients who are considered borderline surgical candidates.

MRI phenotype in renal cancer: is it clinically relevant?

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is most commonly diagnosed as an incidental finding on cross-sectional imaging and represents a significant clinical challenge. Although most patients have a surgically curable lesion at the time of diagnosis, the variability in the biologic behavior of the different histologic subtypes and tumor grade of RCC, together with the increasing array of management options, creates uncertainty for the optimal clinical approach to individual patients. State-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a comprehensive assessment of renal lesions that includes multiple forms of tissue contrast as well as functional parameters, which in turn provides information that helps to address this dilemma. In this article, we review this evolving and increasingly comprehensive role of MRI in the detection, characterization, perioperative evaluation, and assessment of the treatment response of renal neoplasms. We emphasize the ability of the imaging "phenotype" of renal masses on MRI to help predict the histologic subtype, grade, and clinical behavior of RCC.

Diagnostic accuracy of segmental enhancement inversion for diagnosis of renal oncocytoma at biphasic contrast enhanced CT: systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To use systematic review to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of segmental enhancement inversion (SEI) at contrast-enhanced biphasic multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) for the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma.

METHODS

Several electronic databases were searched through October 2013. Two reviewers independently selected studies that met the inclusion criteria and extracted data. Study quality was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. The primary 2 × 2 data were investigated with forest plot and ROC plot of sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Four studies met the inclusion criteria (307 patients). Considerable heterogeneity between studies precluded meta-analysis. Two studies from the same group of investigators demonstrated reasonable diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 59-80 % and specificity 87-99 %), while two others did not (sensitivity 0-6 %, specificity 93-100 %). Possible reasons for this include timing of biphasic MDCT and methods of interpretation but not size of lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

SEI is a specific imaging finding of renal oncocytoma with highly variable sensitivity. This substantial heterogeneity across studies and between institutions suggests that further validation of this imaging finding is necessary prior to application in clinical practice.

KEY POINTS

SEI on CT in small renal masses is specific for oncocytoma. Sensitivity of SEI varies substantially between studies and across institutions. Variability could relate to CT timing or methods of interpretation. High accuracy of SEI has only been reported by one group. Validation of SEI is needed prior to clinical implementation.

Comparison of segmental enhancement inversion on biphasic MDCT between small renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to assess the usefulness of segmental enhancement inversion on biphasic MDCT in differentiating small (<4 cm) renal oncocytomas from chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (CRCCs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-two patients (40 men and 42 women) with a mean (±SD) age of 54±12 years (range, 21-75 years) with 27 renal oncocytomas and 55 CRCCs diagnosed by surgery who underwent contrast-enhanced biphasic CT between January 2000 and December 2011 were included. CT scans were interpreted by two radiologists who were blinded to the pathologic findings. The tumors were evaluated for size and segmental enhancement inversion. After independent evaluation, a consensus was reached by measuring the attenuation. Pathologic analysis determined the presence of fibrous septa, cystic change, hemorrhage, and necrosis. The Fisher exact test was used to evaluate the relationship between segmental enhancement inversion, tumor type, and specific pathologic changes. Interobserver concordance was evaluated with kappa statistics.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in size between renal oncocytomas and CRCCs (p=0.458). Segmental enhancement inversion was present in 23, 20, and 21 (25.6%) of the 82 tumors according to reader 1, reader 2, and the consensus, respectively. The agreement was almost perfect (κ=0.843; p<0.001). Segmental enhancement inversion was more common in renal oncocytomas (63% [17/27]) than in CRCCs (7.3% [4/55]; p<0.001). There were no significant relationships between the four pathologic changes and tumor type or segmental enhancement inversion (p=0.351 and p=0.126, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our study findings suggest that segmental enhancement inversion on biphasic MDCT may be useful in differentiating small renal oncocytomas from CRCCs.