Mortality among Younger and Older Recipients of Kidney Transplants from Expanded Criteria Donors Compared with Standard Criteria Donors

Impact of Donation After Circulatory Death on Outcomes of Expanded Criteria Donor Kidney Transplants

Expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys experience suboptimal outcomes compared with standard criteria donor kidneys. To examine the additional impact of deceased organ category, donation after circulatory death (DCD), and neurologic determination of death (NDD) on ECD outcomes, we examined 1- and 3-year patient and graft survival in all ECD kidney recipients in our institution between January 2008 and December 2017. Of 166 ECD recipients, 49 (29.5%) were DCD and 117 (70.5%) were NDD. Delayed graft function was higher in the DCD/ECD group 61.2 % vs 32.0 % among NDD/ECD recipients. Graft loss was significantly increased among DCD/ECD (hazard ratio for graft loss 4.81 [95% CI1.78-13.01], P = .002 at 1 year and 2.03 [95% CI 1.03-4.0], P = .042 at 3 years). Death-censored graft loss was higher among DCD/ECD (hazard ratio was 10.12 [95% CI, 2.14, 47.92], P = .004 at 1 year and 2.83 [95% CI, 1.24, 6.46], P = .014 at 3 years). There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality. Our study demonstrated that DCD/ECD kidneys have lower graft survival compared with NDD/ECD kidneys. Time on dialysis, waiting time, and panel reactive antibody should be taken into account when offering these organs to patients.

Evolving Trends in Kidney Transplant Outcomes Among Older Adults: A Comparative Analysis Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background

Advancements in medical technology, healthcare delivery, and organ allocation resulted in improved patient/graft survival for older (age ≥65) kidney transplant (KT) recipients. However, the recent trends in these post-KT outcomes are uncertain in light of the mounting burden of cardiovascular disease, changing kidney allocation policies, heterogeneity in candidates' risk profile, and the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Thus, we examined secular trends in post-KT outcomes among older and younger KT recipients over the last 3 decades.

Methods

We identified 73 078 older and 378 800 younger adult (aged 18-64) recipients using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (1990-2022). KTs were grouped into 6 prepandemic eras and 1 postpandemic-onset era. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine temporal trends in post-KT mortality and death-censored graft failure.

Results

From 1990 to 2022, a 19-fold increase in the proportion of older KT recipients was observed compared to a 2-fold increase in younger adults despite a slight decline in the absolute number of older recipients in 2020. The mortality risk for older recipients between 2015 and March 14, 2020, was 39% (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.75) lower compared to 1990-1994, whereas that for younger adults was 47% lower (aHR = 0.53, 95% CI, 0.48-0.59). However, mortality risk during the pandemic was 25% lower (aHR = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.61-0.93) in older adults and 37% lower in younger adults (aHR = 0.63, 95% CI, 0.56-0.70) relative to 1990-1994. For both populations, the risk of graft failure declined over time and was unaffected during the pandemic relative to the preceding period.

Conclusions

The steady improvements in 5-y mortality and graft survival were disrupted during the pandemic, particularly among older adults. Specifically, mortality among older adults reflected rates seen 20 y prior.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus: Findings in nutritional status and body composition

INTRODUCTION

Weight gain and changes in body composition are associated with the onset of diabetes after kidney transplantation, and detailing these changes can help prevent this situation. The study aimed to assess the prevalence of diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation and changes in the nutritional status and body composition in patients with diabetes one year from surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This survey was a single-center, prospective cohort study. Twenty-nine patients over 18 years old who underwent isolated kidney transplantation, without diabetes, were included and followed up for one year. At hospital discharge after transplantation and one year later, anthropometric (weight, height and abdominal circumference), body composition (electrical bioimpedance), routine biochemical and dietary intake assessments were performed.

RESULTS

Most of the patients were male (75%), and the mean age was 48.0±11.8 years old. In the first-year post-surgery 27.6% of patients had DM and the diagnosis was made, on average, 4 months after transplantation. The group with diabetes had, from the beginning to the end of the study, greater weight and body fat, especially abdominal fat. The non-diabetic group, after one year, showed an increase in phase angle, body weight and body masses, more pronounced of fat-free mass, when compared with fat mass gain.

CONCLUSIONS

Both groups showed weight gain, but in the non-diabetic group these changes can be interpreted as an improvement in the nutritional profile. Metabolic abnormalities associated with immunosuppression and eating habits, combination that maintains increased the risk for diabetes for long time, keeping this group with priority in nutritional care.

Impact of Calcineurin Inhibitor-Based Immunosuppression Maintenance During the Dialysis Period After Kidney Transplant Failure on the Next Kidney Graft Outcome: A Retrospective Multicenter Study With Propensity Score Analysis

The impact of immunosuppressive therapy (IS) strategies after kidney transplant failure (KTF) on potential future new grafts is poorly established. We assessed the potential benefit of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based IS maintenance throughout the dialysis period on the outcome of the second kidney transplant (KT). We identified 407 patients who underwent a second KT between January 2008 and December 2018 at four French KT centers. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to control for potential confounding. We included 205 patients with similar baseline characteristics at KTF: a total of 53 received at least CNIs on the retransplant day (G-CNI), and 152 did not receive any IS (G-STOP). On the retransplant date, G-STOP patients experienced a longer pretransplant dialysis time, were more often hyperimmunized, and underwent more expanded-criteria donor KTs than G-CNI patients. During the second KT follow-up period, rejection episodes were similar in both groups. The 10-year survival rates without death and dialysis were 98.7% and 59.5% in G-CNI and G-STOP patients, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, CNI-based IS maintenance was associated with better survival (hazard ratio: 0.08; 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.58, p = 0.01). CNI-based IS maintenance throughout the dialysis period after KTF may improve retransplantation outcomes.

All Expanded Criteria Donor Kidneys are Equal But are Some More Equal Than Others? A Population-Cohort Analysis of UK Transplant Registry Data

Survival outcomes for kidney transplant candidates based on expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidney type is unknown. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of prospectively collected registry data of all waitlisted kidney failure patients receiving dialysis in the United Kingdom. All patients listed for their first kidney-alone transplant between 2000-2019 were included. Treatment types included; living donor; standard criteria donor (SCD); ECD60 (deceased donor aged ≥60 years); ECD50-59 (deceased donor aged 50-59 years with two from the following three; hypertension; raised creatinine and/or death from stroke) or remains on dialysis. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, with time-to-death from listing analyzed using time-dependent non-proportional Cox regression models. The study cohort comprised 47,917 waitlisted kidney failure patients, of whom 34,558 (72.1%) received kidney transplantation. ECD kidneys (n = 7,356) were stratified as ECD60 (n = 7,009) or ECD50-59 (n = 347). Compared to SCD, both ECD60 (Hazard Ratio 1.126, 95% CI 1.093-1.161) and ECD50-59 (Hazard Ratio 1.228, 95% CI 1.113-1.356) kidney recipients have higher all-cause mortality. However, compared to dialysis, both ECD60 (Hazard Ratio 0.194, 95% CI 0.187-0.201) and ECD50-59 (Hazard Ratio 0.218, 95% CI 0.197-0.241) kidney recipients have lower all-cause mortality. ECD kidneys, regardless of definition, provide equivalent and superior survival benefits in comparison to remaining waitlisted.

Kidney Donor Profile Index and allograft outcomes: interactive effects of estimated post-transplant survival score and ischaemic time

Background

The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) is routinely reported by the donation agencies in Australia. We determined the association between KDPI and short-term allograft loss and assessed if this association was modified by the estimated post-transplant survival (EPTS) score and total ischaemic time.

Methods

Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, the association between KDPI (in quartiles) and 3-year overall allograft loss was examined using adjusted Cox regression analysis. The interactive effects between KDPI, EPTS score and total ischaemic time on allograft loss were assessed.

Results

Of 4006 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2010 and 2015, 451 (11%) recipients experienced allograft loss within 3 years post-transplant. Compared with recipients of kidneys with a KDPI of 0-25%, recipients who received donor kidneys with a KDPI >75% experienced a 2-fold increased risk of 3-year allograft loss {adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.53-2.71]}. The adjusted HRs for kidneys with a KDPI of 26-50% and 51-75% were 1.27 (95% CI 0.94-1.71) and 1.31 (95% CI 0.96-1.77), respectively. There were significant interactions between KDPI and EPTS scores (P-value for interaction <.01) and total ischaemic time (P-value for interaction <.01) such that the associations between higher KDPI quartiles and 3-year allograft loss were strongest in recipients with the lowest EPTS scores and longest total ischaemic time.

Conclusion

Recipients with higher post-transplant expected survival and transplants with longer total ischaemia who received donor allografts with higher KDPI scores experienced a greater risk of short-term allograft loss compared with those recipients with reduced post-transplant expected survival and with shorter total ischemia.

Deceased Donor Characteristics and Kidney Transplant Outcomes

Kidney transplantation is the therapy of choice for people living with kidney failure who are suitable for surgery. However, the disparity between supply versus demand for organs means many either die or are removed from the waiting-list before receiving a kidney allograft. Reducing unnecessary discard of deceased donor kidneys is important to maximize utilization of a scarce and valuable resource but requires nuanced decision-making. Accepting kidneys from deceased donors with heterogenous characteristics for waitlisted kidney transplant candidates, often in the context of time-pressured decision-making, requires an understanding of the association between donor characteristics and kidney transplant outcomes. Deceased donor clinical factors can impact patient and/or kidney allograft survival but risk-versus-benefit deliberation must be balanced against the morbidity and mortality associated with remaining on the waiting-list. In this article, the association between deceased kidney donor characteristics and post kidney transplant outcomes for the recipient are reviewed. While translating this evidence to individual kidney transplant candidates is a challenge, emerging strategies to improve this process will be discussed. Fundamentally, tools and guidelines to inform decision-making when considering deceased donor kidney offers will be valuable to both professionals and patients.

Early Graft Loss Following Transplantation From Expanded Criteria Donors

Background

Expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are associated with higher graft loss rates than standard criteria donor kidneys. We sought to determine factors associated with early graft loss and their discrimination ability for this outcome compared with kidney donor risk index.

Methods

Data were extracted from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) for ECD transplants between 1997 and 2014. The primary outcome was early graft loss (all-cause graft loss within 3 y of transplantation). Death-censored graft loss was substituted as a sensitivity analysis. Era-adjusted odds ratios were calculated by multivariable logistic regression for donor, recipient, and transplant factors available at transplantation. Discrimination was assessed by c-statistic, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated by bootstrapping.

Results

Of 2152 ECD kidney transplants, early graft loss occurred in 406 (19%) and was associated with recipient diabetes, smoking, First Nations recipients, and oliguria. Of factors defining ECD (age, elevated terminal creatinine, hypertension, death from cerebrovascular accident), all but mode of death were associated with early graft loss. The multivariable model, including known donor, recipient, and transplant factors, was moderately good at predicting early graft loss (c-statistic 0.65; 95% CI, 0.62-0.68). Recipient factors (c-statistic 0.62; 95% CI, 0.59-0.65) performed equally well compared with donor factors (c-statistic 0.60; 95% CI, 0.57-0.64) or the kidney donor risk index (c-statistic 0.60; 95% CI, 0.56-0.63).

Conclusions

Early graft loss occurs in approximately one-fifth of ECD kidney transplants. The discriminatory value of commonly used recipient, donor, and transplant factors are approximately comparable and limited.

Proteomic analysis of machine perfusion solution from brain dead donor kidneys reveals that elevated complement, cytoskeleton and lipid metabolism proteins are associated with 1-year outcome

Assessment of donor kidney quality is based on clinical scores or requires biopsies for histological assessment. Noninvasive strategies to identify and predict graft outcome at an early stage are, therefore, needed. We evaluated the perfusate of donation after brain death (DBD) kidneys during nonoxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP). In particular, we compared perfusate protein profiles of good outcome (GO) and suboptimal outcome (SO) 1‐year post‐transplantation. Samples taken 15 min after the start HMP (T1) and before the termination of HMP (T2) were analysed using quantitative liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS). Hierarchical clustering of the 100 most abundant proteins showed discrimination between grafts with a GO and SO at T1. Elevated levels of proteins involved in classical complement cascades at both T1 and T2 and a reduced abundance of lipid metabolism at T1 and of cytoskeletal proteins at T2 in GO versus SO was observed. ATP‐citrate synthase and fatty acid‐binding protein 5 (T1) and immunoglobulin heavy variable 2‐26 and desmoplakin (T2) showed 91% and 86% predictive values, respectively, for transplant outcome. Taken together, DBD kidney HMP perfusate profiles can distinguish between outcome 1‐year post‐transplantation. Furthermore, it provides insights into mechanisms that could play a role in post‐transplant outcomes.

Patient and Graft Survival After Dual Kidney Transplantation With Marginal Donors in Comparison to Matched Control Groups

BACKGROUND

Postmortal organ donor rates remain low in Germany, whereas donor age has been increasing considerably in the last decades. As a consequence of low donation rates older and more marginal donor kidneys are accepted for transplantation. However, procured kidneys from very old a/o marginal donors may be considered as not suitable for transplantation as a single organ and subsequently be discarded. However, dual transplantation of both kidneys from such donors may provide an opportunity to nevertheless use these organs for renal transplantation, thereby providing the twofold nephron mass as a single kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We compared in this retrospective analysis the outcome of 10 recipients of a dual kidney transplantation (DKT) with 40 matched recipients of a single kidney transplantation (SKT). Recipients were matched for donor and recipient age (ie, a maximum age difference of ±10 years in a ratio of 1:4 for DKT vs SKT recipients). In addition, a second SKT control group of 10 SKT recipients being transplanted immediately before each DKT recipient with a kidney from a donor aged ≥65 years was used for comparison. All renal transplant recipients were observed for up to 3 years or until July 31, 2020.

RESULTS

Mean donor and recipient age was 77.2 ± 4.6/75.1 ± 6.6/82.1 ± 7.9 and 66.4 ± 5.8/66.1 ± 6.0/64.8 ± 8.4 for SKT group 1/SKT group 2/DKT, respectively. Procurement serum creatinine concentrations were significantly higher in the DKT group in comparison to the SKT control group 1 (P = .019) as was the rate of transplant artery atherosclerosis (P = .021). Furthermore, Kidney Donor Profile Index, and Kidney Donor Risk Index were significantly higher (P = .0138/P = .064, and P < .001/P = .038) in the DKT group than in SKT group 1 and 2. Rates of acute rejection and delayed graft function were not significantly different between groups, though biopsy-proven acute rejection was numerically higher in the SKT groups. Patient survival and overall and death-censored graft survival rates were also not significantly different between groups, although they tended to be higher after DKT.

CONCLUSIONS

DKT provides an opportunity to successfully use postmortal kidneys even from donors aged >80 years and a Kidney Donor Profile Index ≥95% for renal transplantation. DKT may thereby increase the available pool of donors to better serve patients with end-stage renal disease on the waiting list.

Retrieved but not transplanted kidneys: how to limit the losses? A retrospective national study

Despite the organ shortage, a significant number of deceased donor kidneys are retrieved but not transplanted (RNTK). This study aims to describe and analyze the main causes of potential grafts discard and to propose adequate solutions. We collected data from the Cristal database of the French Biomedicine Agency about RNTK over one year. Expert opinion was taken from urologists with extensive expertise in renal transplantation. They retrospectively analyzed each record to assess the appropriateness of each graft refusal and subsequent kidney discard. Of 252 kidneys were retrieved but not transplanted in France over one year. The main reasons for discard were vascular abnormalities in 43.7% (n = 110), suspicion of malignant tumor in 18.7% (n = 47), and severe histological lesions on preimplantation biopsy in 12.3% (n = 31). The reason for kidney refusal was undetermined in 4.8% (n = 12). Iatrogenic lesions were responsible for 26.2% (n = 66). Overall, 46.0% (n = 16) and 25.0% (n = 63) of the grafts were, respectively, properly and improperly denied, and the analysis was not possible in 29.0% (n = 73). In total, 36.9% of RNTK could have been transplanted. Reduction of iatrogenic lesions, improvement of microsurgical repair skills, and proper histological examination are necessary to reduce the number of RNTK. A prospective study applying the proposed principles is undoubtedly essential to complete this work.

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, and immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence, and the strengths of recommendations are provided. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.

Hepatitis C-positive donor to negative recipient kidney transplantation: A real-world experience

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that transplanting a hepatitis C virus (HCV)-negative recipients with a HCV-positive donor is feasible in a research setting. In February 2018, we began transplanting HCV-negative recipients with HCV-positive donors as standard of care.

METHODS

All patients, except those with previously cured HCV and those with cirrhosis, were consented for HCV NAT-positive donor kidneys. After transplantation, patients were tested for HCV RNA until viremic. A direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agent was prescribed based on genotype and insurance approval. Sustained virologic response (SVR) at weeks 4 and 12 was recorded. Renal function and death censored graft survival at 1 year were evaluated and compared to recipients of HCV NAT-negative kidneys.

RESULTS

A total of 25 HCV NAT-positive donor kidney transplants from February to October 2018 were performed. All patients received basiliximab and maintained with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Median time from viremia to start of DAA was 13 (8-22) days. The most common genotype was 1a (60%), followed by 3a (28%). The most commonly prescribed DAA was ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (56%), followed by velpatasvir/sofosbuvir (32%), and then glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (12%). All patients achieved initial SVR12, except one. One patient had a mixed-genotype infection requiring retreatment to achieve SVR12. Death censored graft survival was 96%. Recipients of HCV NAT-positive organs compared to HCV NAT-negative organs received younger donors (mean 35 ± 8.9 vs 45.1 ± 15.7 years; P < .01) and spent less time on the waitlist (median 479 (93-582) vs 1808 (567-2263) days; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

HCV NAT-negative recipients can be safely and successfully transplanted with HCV NAT-positive donor kidneys outside of a research protocol. Access to DAA and timely administration of therapy is important and an insurance approval process within the transplant center can be beneficial to patients. A case of mixed-genotype infection was presented, and although not as common, can be successfully treated. HCV organs can expand the organ pool and should no longer be considered experimental. The use of these organs in HCV-negative recipient's decreases waiting time, have excellent outcomes, and should be considered standard of care.

Young deceased donor kidneys show a survival benefit over older donor kidneys in transplant recipients aged 20-50 years: a study by the ERA-EDTA Registry

BACKGROUND

Updated survival outcomes of young recipients receiving young or old deceased donor kidneys are required when considering accepting a deceased donor kidney.

METHODS

We examined outcomes in 6448 European kidney allografts donated from younger (≥20-<50 years) and older (≥50-<70 years) deceased donors when transplanted into very young (≥20-<35 years) or young (≥35-<50 years) adult recipients. Outcomes of first kidney transplantations during 2000-13 and followed-up to 2015 were determined via competing risk, restricted mean survival and Cox regression methods.

RESULTS

The 10-year cumulative incidence of graft failure was lowest in very young {22.0% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 19.1-24.9]} and young [15.3% (95% CI 13.7-16.9)] recipients of younger donor kidneys and highest in very young [36.7% (95% CI 31.9-41.5)] and young [29.2% (95% CI 25.1-33.2)] recipients of older donor kidneys. At the 10-year follow-up, younger donor kidneys had a 1 year (very young) or 9 months (young) longer mean graft survival time compared with older donor kidneys. Graft failure risk in younger donor kidneys was 45% [very young adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.55 (95% CI 0.44-0.68)] and 40% [young aHR 0.60 (95% CI 0.53-0.67)] lower compared with older donor kidneys. A 1-year increase in donor age resulted in a 2% [very young aHR 1.02 (95% CI 1.00-1.04)] or 1% [young aHR 1.01 (95% CI 1.00-1.01)] increase in the 10-year risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger donor kidneys show survival benefits over older donor kidneys in adult recipients ages 20-50 years. Updated survival outcomes from older deceased donors are necessary due to advances in transplantation medicine and the increasing role these donors play in organ transplantation.

Observational Study Evaluating the Outcome of Cirrhotic Hepatitis C Patients Submitted to Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

After renal transplantation (RTx) hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality resulting in lower patient and graft survival. Few studies have investigated the evolution of renal transplant patients with cirrhosis owing to HCV. The objectives were to evaluate the post-transplant evolution of cirrhotic patients and to compare them with noncirrhotic patients considering the outcomes, including hepatic decompensation, graft loss, and death.

METHODS

The retrospective-cohort study analyzed the data of patients undergoing RTx between 1993 and 2014, positive anti-HCV, HCV-RNA before RTx, and availability of data for assessment of cirrhosis. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables were compared between the groups according to the outcomes. The same were made between cirrhotic patients with and without portal hypertension (PH). Survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier test and compared by the log-rank test. Variables associated with the outcomes were analyzed using Cox regression.

RESULTS

This study included noncirrhotic (n = 201) and cirrhotic patients (n = 23). In cirrhotic patients, they were significantly older (49 vs 41.6 years) and mostly male (87% vs 65%), with a greater number of previous RTx (48% vs 18%), less frequent use of azathioprine (26% vs 54%), cyclosporine (13% vs 46.5%), more frequent use of tacrolimus (87% vs 55%), lower count of platelets × 1000 cells/mm³(110 vs 187), and higher pre-RTx international normalized ratio (1.20 vs 1.1).The Kaplan-Meier survival differed in cirrhotic vs noncirrhotic patients only in hepatic decompensation. Cox regression analysis identified pretransplant cirrhosis (hazard ratio 6.64, 95% confidence interval, 2.59-17.06) and tacrolimus (hazard ratio 3.17,95% confidence interval, 1.05-9.58) as variables independently associated with decompensation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HCV and cirrhosis exhibit higher morbidity when submitted to RTx than noncirrhotic patients, with a higher risk of hepatic decompensation. However, no difference was observed in liver-related mortality, suggesting that RTx is a feasible option in cirrhotic patients without decompensation, even if they have PH.

Should kidney allografts from old donors be allocated only to old recipients?

In several deceased donor kidney allocation systems, organs from elderly donors are allocated primarily to elderly recipients. The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) was implemented in 1999, and since then, especially in Europe, the use of organs from elderly donors has steadily increased. The proportion of ≥60-year-old donors reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS) by European centers has doubled, from 21% in 2000-2001 to 42% in 2016-2017. Therefore, in the era of organ shortage it is a matter of debate whether kidney organs from elderly donors should only be allocated to elderly recipients or whether <65-year-old recipients can also benefit from these generally as "marginal" categorized organs. To discuss this issue, a European Consensus Meeting was organized by the CTS on April 12, 2018, in Heidelberg, in which 36 experts participated. Based on available evidence, it was unanimously concluded that kidney organs from 65- to 74-year-old donors can also be allocated to 55- to 64-year-old recipients, especially if these organs are from donors with no history of hypertension, no increased creatinine, no cerebrovascular death, and no other reasons for defining a marginal donor, such as diabetes or cancer.

Expanded Criteria Donor Kidneys With Kidney Donor Profile Index ≤ 85%: Are We Doing Enough to Counsel Our Patients?

BACKGROUND

Kidneys at higher risk for allograft failure are defined by the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) > 85% in the current kidney allocation system (KAS), replacing the historical concept of expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys in the previous KAS. Discrepancies exist in the classification of "high-risk kidneys" between the 2 KAS. In the current KAS, only recipients of KDPI > 85% kidneys are counseled about the high risk of allograft failure and are required to sign a consent. In this study, we evaluated the outcomes and allocation of kidneys with discordant classification.

METHODS

Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, kidneys transplanted between 01/2002 and 09/2016 were classified according to the old (standard criteria donor [SCD]/ECD) and current (KDPI) KAS. We then grouped them as concordant (KDPI ≤ 85% + SCD or KDPI > 85% + ECD) and discordant (KDPI ≤ 85% + ECD or KDPI > 85% + SCD) kidneys.

RESULTS

Approximately 11% of transplanted kidneys were discordant in classification. Among kidneys with KDPI ≤ 85%, ECD status conferred a 64% (95% CI: 56%-73%) higher risk of allograft failure compared to SCD status. However, SCD/ECD status was not associated with differential outcomes in KDPI > 85% kidneys. These ECD kidneys have KDPIs > 50% and have been transplanted across all estimated post-transplant survival (EPTS) deciles.

CONCLUSION

Adequate counseling about the risk and benefit of accepting ECD kidneys with KDPI ≤ 85% versus waiting on dialysis should be explored with the patients, especially those with lower EPTS.

Non-standard criteria donors in pediatric kidney transplantation

KT remains the treatment of choice for ESRD in children. However, the demand for kidney transplants continues to outstrip supply, even in the pediatric scenario. We reviewed the applicability of nonSCDs for pediatric KT. There is a lack of studies analyzing this modality among pediatric donors and recipients, where most conclusions are based on predictions from adult data. Nevertheless, marginal donors might be a reasonable option in selected cases. For example, the use of older LDs is an acceptable option, with outcomes comparable to SCDs. Organs donated after cardiac death represent another possibility, albeit with logistic, ethical, and legal limitations in some countries. AKI donors also constitute an option in special situations, although there are no pediatric data on these transplants. Likewise, there are no data on the use of expanded criteria donors in pediatric patients, but this appears not to be a good option, considering the compromised long-term survival.

Nonimmunologic Factors Affecting Long-Term Outcomes of Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the impact of nonimmuno-logic factors on patient and graft survival after deceased-donor kidney transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All deceased-donor kidney transplants performed between January 2004 and December 2015 were included in our analyses. We used the independent t test to calculate significant differences between means above and below medians of various parameters.

RESULTS

All study patients (N = 205; 58.7% males) received antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy and standard maintenance therapy. Patients were free from infection, malignancy, and cardiac, liver, and pulmonary system abnormalities. Most patients (89.2%) were recipients of a first graft. Median patient age, weight, and cold ischemia time were 38 years, 65 kg, and 15 hours, respectively. Delayed graft function, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension occurred in 19.1%, 43.4%, and 77.9% of patients, respectively. The 1- and 5-year graft survival rates were 95% and 73.8%. Graft survival was not affected by donor or recipient sex or recipient diabetes or hypertension. However, graft survival was longer in patients who received no graft biopsy (8.2 vs 6.9 y; P = .027) and in those who had diagnosis of calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity versus antibody-mediated rejection after biopsy (8.19 vs 3.66 y; P = .0047). Longer survival was shown with donors who had traumatic death versus cerebro-vascular accident (5.9 vs 5.3 y; P = .029) and donors below the 50th percentile in age (8.23 and 7.14 y; P = .0026) but less with donors who had terminal acute kidney injury (6.97 vs 8.16 y; P = .0062). We found a negative correlation between graft survival and donor age (P = .01) and 1-year serum creatinine (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Donor age, cause of brain death, and acute kidney injury affected graft survival in our study cohort but not donor or recipient sex or posttransplant or donor blood pressure.

Risk Factors for Early Graft Failure and Death After Kidney Transplantation in Recipients Older Than 70 Years

INTRODUCTION

Although kidney transplantation carries a survival benefit compared with dialysis, mortality, especially the first year after transplantation, is high in recipients older than 70. The aim of this study was to evaluate early death and graft failure, and to determine the risk factors associated with these events in this specific population.

METHODS

All patients older than 70 years who received a kidney transplant between January 2000 and December 2014 in the North-West of France were included (n = 171). Baseline characteristics and outcomes after transplantation were studied. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess patient and graft survival, and Cox regression analysis to evaluate risk factors for graft failure and patient death.

RESULTS

The mean recipient age was 73.3 ± 2.5 years. Death-censored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years were 82.6%, 78.7%, and 75.4%, respectively. Patient survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 90.1%, 82.5%, and 68.1%, respectively. One year after transplantation, 17 patients (9.9%) were dead, mainly from infectious (58.5%) or cardiovascular disease (29.4%). According to the Cox multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for death or graft failure during the first year were arrhythmia (odds ratio [OR] 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-4.8), left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) under 56% (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.18-4.83), human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.04-4.2), deceased donor from cardiovascular cause (OR 5.18; 95% CI 1.22-6.3), and acute rejection (OR 2.77; 95% CI 1.2-6.3).

CONCLUSION

In kidney transplant recipients older than 70 years, cardiac evaluation and immunosuppression optimization seem to be crucial to improve short-term patient and graft survival.

Deceased organ donation activity and efficiency in Switzerland between 2008 and 2017: achievements and future challenges

BACKGROUND

Various actions have been taken during the last decade to increase the number of organs from deceased donors available for transplantation in Switzerland. This study provides an overview on key figures of the Swiss deceased organ donation and transplant activity between 2008 and 2017. In addition, it puts the evolution of the Swiss donation program's efficiency in relation to the situation in the neighboring countries.

METHODS

This study is an analysis of prospective registry data, covering the period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2017. It includes all actual deceased organ donors (ADD) in Switzerland. Donor data were extracted from the Swiss Organ Allocation System. The "donor conversion index" (DCI) methodology and data was used for the comparison of donation program efficiency in Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Italy and France.

RESULTS

During the study period there were 1116 ADD in Switzerland. The number of ADD per year increased from 91 in 2008 to 145 in 2017 (+ 59%). The reintroduction of the donation after cardiocirculatory death (DCD) program in 2011 resulted in the growth of annual percentages of DCD donors, reaching a maximum of 27% in 2017. The total number of organs transplanted from ADD was 3763 (3.4 ± 1.5 transplants per donor on average). Of these, 48% were kidneys (n = 1814), 24% livers (n = 903), 12% lungs (n = 445), 9% hearts (n = 352) and 7% pancreata or pancreatic islets (n = 249). The donation program efficiency assessment showed an increase of the Swiss DCI from 1.6% in 2008 to 2.7% in 2017 (+ 69%). The most prominent efficiency growth was observed between 2012 and 2017. Even though Swiss donation efficiency increased during the study period, it remained below the DCI of the French and Austrian donation programs.

CONCLUSION

Swiss donation activity and efficiency grew during the last decade. The increased donation efficiency suggests that measures implemented so far were effective. The lower efficiency of the Swiss donation program, compared to the French and Austrian programs, may likely be explained by the lower consent rate in Switzerland. This issue should be addressed in order to achieve the goal of more organs available for transplantation.

Does the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) predict graft and patient survival in a Spanish population?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI), together with other donor and recipient variables, can optimise the organ allocation process. This study aims to check the feasibility of the KDPI for a Spanish population and its predictive ability of graft and patient survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 2,734 kidney transplants carried out in Andalusia between January 2006 and December 2015 were studied. Cases were grouped by recipient age, categorised by KDPI quartile and both graft and patient survival were compared among groups.

RESULTS

The KDPI accurately discriminated optimal organs from suboptimal or marginal ones. For adult recipients (aged: 18-59years) it presents a hazard ratio of 1.013 (P<.001) for death-censored graft survival and of 1.013 (P=.007) for patient survival. For elderly recipients (aged: 60+years), KDPI presented a hazard ratio of 1.016 (P=.001) for death-censored graft survival and of 1.011 (P=.007) for patient survival. A multivariate analysis identified the KDPI, donor age, donation after circulatory death, recipient age and gender as predictive factors of graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained show that the KDPI makes it possible to relate the donor's characteristics with the greater or lesser survival of the graft and the patient in the Spanish population. However, due to certain limitations, a new index for Spain based on Spanish or European data should be created. In this study, some predictive factors of graft survival are identified that may serve as a first step in this path.

Propensity score-based comparison of the graft failure risk between kidney transplant recipients of standard and expanded criteria donor grafts: Toward increasing the pool of marginal donors

From a prospective and multicentric French cohort, we proposed an external validation study for the expanded criteria donor (ECD), based on 4833 kidney recipients transplanted for the first time between 2000 and 2014. We estimated the subject-specific effect from a multivariable Cox model. We confirmed a 1.75-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-2.00, P < .0001) increase in graft failure risk if a given patient received an ECD graft compared to a graft from a donor with standard criteria (standard criteria donor [SCD]). Complementarily, we estimated the population-average effect using propensity scores. We estimated a 1.34-fold (95% CI 1.09-1.64, P = .0049) increase in graft failure risk among ECD patients receiving an ECD graft compared to receiving a SCD graft. With a 10-year follow-up, it corresponded to a decrease of 8 months of the mean time to graft failure due to ECD transplantation (95% CI 2-14 months). The population-average relative risk due to ECD transplantation and the corresponding absolute effect seem finally not so high. Regarding the increase of quality of life in transplantation, our study constitutes an argument to extend the definition of marginality by considering more grafts at high risk and thereby enlarging the pool of kidney grafts.

Kidney transplant outcomes from older deceased donors: a paired kidney analysis by the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry

As the median age of deceased kidney donors rises, updated knowledge of transplant outcomes from older deceased donors in differing donor-recipient age groups is required. Using ERA-EDTA Registry data we determined survival outcomes of kidney allografts donated from the same older deceased donor (55-70 years), and transplanted into one recipient younger and one recipient of similar age to the donor. The recipient pairs were divided into two groups: group 1; younger (median age: 52 years) and older (60 years) and group 2; younger (41 years) and older (60 years). A total of 1410 adults were transplanted during 2000-2007. Compared to the older recipients, the mean number of functioning graft years at 10 years was 6 months longer in the group 1 and group 2 younger recipients (P < 0.001). Ten-year graft survival was 54% and 40% for the group 1 younger and older recipients, and 60% and 49% for the group 2 younger and older recipients. Paired Cox regression analyses showed a lower risk of graft failure (group 1 younger; adjusted relative risk [RRa]:0.57, 95% CI:0.41-0.79, and group 2 younger; RRa:0.63, 95% CI:0.47-0.85) in younger recipients. Outcomes from older deceased donor allografts transplanted into differing donor-recipient age groups are better than previously reported. These allografts remain a valuable transplant resource, particularly for similar-aged recipients.

[Focusing on kidney transplantation in the elderly]

Due to the increase in life expectancy and the ageing of end-stage renal disease patients, the number of patients older than 65 years receiving a kidney transplant has been continuously growing over the last fifteen years. The benefits of renal transplantation compared to dialysis in terms of survival and quality of life have been shown in selected recipients over 65, or 70 years. However, the age remains the main limiting factor for the access to the waiting list, and the reluctance of the clinicians can be explained by the multiple comorbidities of these candidates, their limited life expectancy or the shortage of grafts. The challenge is to select the candidates who can benefit from renal transplantation, thanks to rigorous cardiovascular and neoplastic evaluation before enrolment and by taking into account the specific characteristics of elderly patients. The living donor appears to be the ideal option for elderly recipients, the alternative being the extended criteria donor, allowing waiting times to be limited. The choice of immunosuppressive therapy is also crucial in these patients at high risk of infectious and cardiovascular complications in whom the occurrence of acute rejection can have severe consequences. There are currently no specific recommendations for immunosuppression in elderly recipients, and we would need large-scale randomized studies to improve the prognosis of renal transplantation in this population.

Strategies for an Expanded Use of Kidneys From Elderly Donors

The old-for-old allocation policy used for kidney transplantation (KT) has confirmed the survival benefit compared to remaining listed on dialysis. Shortage of standard donors has stimulated the development of strategies aimed to expand acceptance criteria, particularly of kidneys from elderly donors. We have systematically reviewed the literature on those different strategies. In addition to the review of outcomes of expanded criteria donor or advanced age kidneys, we assessed the value of the Kidney Donor Profile Index policy, preimplantation biopsy, dual KT, machine perfusion and special immunosuppressive protocols. Survival and functional outcomes achieved with expanded criteria donor, high Kidney Donor Profile Index or advanced age kidneys are poorer than those with standard ones. Outcomes using advanced age brain-dead or cardiac-dead donor kidneys are similar. Preimplantation biopsies and related scores have been useful to predict function, but their applicability to transplant or refuse a kidney graft has probably been overestimated. Machine perfusion techniques have decreased delayed graft function and could improve graft survival. Investing 2 kidneys in 1 recipient does not make sense when a single KT would be enough, particularly in elderly recipients. Tailored immunosuppression when transplanting an old kidney may be useful, but no formal trials are available.Old donors constitute an enormous source of useful kidneys, but their retrieval in many countries is infrequent. The assumption of limited but precious functional expectancy for an old kidney and substantial reduction of discard rates should be generalized to mitigate these limitations.

Cardiovascular disease: Risk factors and applicability of a risk model in a Greek cohort of renal transplant recipients

AIM

To investigate the incidence and the determinants of cardiovascular morbidity in Greek renal transplant recipients (RTRs) expressed as major advance cardiac event (MACE) rate.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty-two adult patients with a functioning graft for at least three months and available data that were followed up on the August 31, 2015 at two transplant centers of Western Greece were included in this study. Baseline recipients’ data elements included demographics, clinical characteristics, history of comorbid conditions and laboratory parameters. Follow-up data regarding MACE occurrence were collected retrospectively from the patients’ records and MACE risk score was calculated for each patient.

RESULTS

The mean age was 53 years (63.6% males) and 47 patients (19.4%) had a pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) before transplantation. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 52 ± 17 mL/min per 1.73 m². During follow-up 36 patients (14.9%) suffered a MACE with a median time to MACE 5 years (interquartile range: 2.2-10 years). Recipients with a MACE compared to recipients without a MACE had a significantly higher mean age (59 years vs 52 years, P < 0.001) and a higher prevalence of pre-existing CVD (44.4% vs 15%, P < 0.001). The 7-year predicted mean risk for MACE was 14.6% ± 12.5% overall. In RTRs who experienced a MACE, the predicted risk was 22.3% ± 17.1% and was significantly higher than in RTRs without an event 13.3% ± 11.1% (P = 0.003). The discrimination ability of the model in the Greek database of RTRs was good with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.68 (95%CI: 0.58-0.78).

CONCLUSION

In this Greek cohort of RTRs, MACE occurred in 14.9% of the patients, pre-existing CVD was the main risk factor, while MACE risk model was proved a dependable utility in predicting CVD post RT.

Infectious complications as the leading cause of death after kidney transplantation: analysis of more than 10,000 transplants from a single center

AIM

To identify specific causes of graft failure in a large sample of kidney transplant patients from a middle-income, developing country.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study analyzing all consecutive single kidney transplants (KTs) performed at a single center in Brazil between January 1st 1998 and December 31st 2013. The database closing date was December 31st 2014.

RESULTS

Out of 10,400 KTs, there were 1191 (11.45%) deaths with a functioning graft, 40 cases (0.38%) of primary non-function (PNF) and 1417 cases (13.62%) of graft loss excluding death and PNF as the cause. Infectious complications (404 cases, 34% of all deaths) were the major cause of death. Most deaths due to infection occurred within the first year after transplantation (157 deaths, 38.86%). Immunologic mechanisms, comprising acute rejection and immune-mediated interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA), were responsible for 52% of all cases of graft failure not involving recipient death. Half of the losses by acute rejection occurred late after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to what is observed in developed countries, infectious complications are the main challenge with kidney transplantation in Brazil. Non-adherence to treatment also appears to contribute significantly to long-term kidney graft loss. Strategies for improvement should focus on better compliance and a greater safety profile of immunosuppressive treatment.

Survival Benefit From Kidney Transplantation Using Kidneys From Deceased Donors Aged ≥75 Years: A Time-Dependent Analysis

Patients with end-stage renal disease have longer survival after kidney transplantation than they would by remaining on dialysis; however, outcome with kidneys from donors aged ≥75 years and the survival of recipients of these organs compared with their dialysis counterparts with the same probability of obtaining an organ is unknown. In a longitudinal mortality study, 2040 patients on dialysis were placed on a waiting list, and 389 of them received a first transplant from a deceased donor aged ≥75 years. The adjusted risk of death and survival were calculated by non-proportional hazards analysis with being transplanted as a time-dependent effect. Projected years of life since placement on the waiting list was almost twofold higher for transplanted patients. Nonproportional adjusted risk of death after transplantation was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.32; p < 0.001) in comparison with those that remained on dialysis. Stratifying by age, adjusted hazard ratios for death were 0.17 (95% CI 0.47-0.06; p = 0.001) for those aged <65 years, 0.56 (95% CI 0.92-0.34; p = 0.022) for those aged 65-69 years and 0.82 (95% CI 1.28-0.52; p = 0.389) for those aged ≥70 years. Although kidney transplantation from elderly deceased donors is associated with reduced graft survival, transplanted patients have lower mortality than those remaining on dialysis.