1
|
Yan Y, Liu Y, Li B, Xu S, Du H, Wang X, Li Y. Trends and predictors of changes in renal function after radical nephrectomy for renal tumours. BMC Nephrol 2024; 25:174. [PMID: 38773467 PMCID: PMC11106867 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03601-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common postoperative complication in patients who undergo radical nephrectomy for renal tumours. However, the factors influencing long-term renal function require further investigation. OBJECTIVE This study was designed to investigate the trends in renal function changes and risk factors for renal function deterioration in renal tumour patients after radical nephrectomy. METHODS We monitored changes in renal function before and after surgery for 3 years. The progression of renal function was determined by the progression and degradation of CKD stages. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyse the causes of renal function progression. RESULTS We analysed the data of 329 patients with renal tumours who underwent radical nephrectomies between January 2013 and December 2018. In this study, 43.7% of patients had postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), and 48.3% had CKD at advanced stages. Further research revealed that patients' renal function stabilized 3 months after surgery. Additionally, renal function changes during these 3 months have a substantial impact on the progression of long-term renal function changes in patients. CONCLUSION AKI may be an indicator of short-term postoperative changes in renal function. Renal function tests should be performed in patients with AKI after radical nephrectomy to monitor the progression of functional impairment, particularly within the first 3 months after radical nephrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongchao Yan
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yunbo Liu
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Bin Li
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Shang Xu
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Haotian Du
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Xinning Wang
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
| | - Yanjiang Li
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou Z, Li Z, Ning K, Xiong L, Liu H, Huang Y, Luo X, Peng Y, Chen L, Ma B, Zou X, Wei W, Luo C, Han H, Guo S, Dong P, Zhou F, Yu C, Zhang Z. Long-term effect of acute ischemic injury on the kidney underwent clamped partial nephrectomy. iScience 2023; 26:107610. [PMID: 37664597 PMCID: PMC10474450 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
GFR reaches a new baseline, primarily correlating with nephron-mass preservation, 1-12 months after partial nephrectomy (PN). However, does the ipsilateral GFR experience subsequent decline, and does acute ischemic injury has long-term effect on the operated kidney? 319 patients with two kidneys and unilateral clamped PN were analyzed. All had preoperative, new-baseline, and latest follow-up imaging/serum creatinine levels. Annual ipsilateral GFR decline rate (AIGDR) was defined as new-baseline GFR minus latest follow-up GFR normalized by new-baseline GFR, per year. Spectrum score was used to reflect the degree of acute ischemic injury in the operated kidney. 100 subjects searching for health screening served as controls. Predictive factors for AIGDR were assessed. The median AIGDR was 2.25%, significantly higher than controls (0.88%, p = 0.036). With some contralateral hypertrophy, the global annual GFR decline was similar to that of controls (0.81% vs. 0.88%, p = 0.7). Spectrum score correlated significantly with AIGDR (p = 0.037). These results support that acute ischemic injury has long-term effect on the operated kidney.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohui Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiyong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kang Ning
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Longbin Xiong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huiming Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yixin Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin Luo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yulu Peng
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lijie Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Binglei Ma
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangpeng Zou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wensu Wei
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Cheng Luo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chunping Yu
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Institute of Urology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cheng PY, Lee HY, Li WM, Huang SK, Liu CL, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Lo CW, Yu CC, Wang SS, Chen CS, Tseng JS, Lin WR, Yeong-Chin J, Cheong IS, Jiang YH, Lee YK, Chen YT, Chen SH, Chiang BJ, Hsueh TY, Huang CY, Wu CC, Lin WY, Tsai YC, Yu KJ, Huang CP, Huang YY, Tsai CY. Preoperative hydronephrosis is an independent protective factor of renal function decline after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:944321. [PMID: 36910617 PMCID: PMC9998910 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.944321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the predictive role of pre-nephroureterectomy (NU) hydronephrosis on post-NU renal function (RF) change and preserved eligibility rate for adjuvant therapy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Patients and methods This retrospective study collected data of 1018 patients from the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group registry of 26 institutions. The patients were divided into two groups based on the absence or presence of pre-NU hydronephrosis. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated pre- and post-NU respectively. The one month post-NU RF change, chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, and the preserved eligibility rate for adjuvant therapy were compared for each CKD stage. Results 404 (39.2%) patients without and 614 (60.8%) patients with pre-NU hydronephrosis were enrolled. The median post-NU change in the eGFR was significantly lower in the hydronephrosis group (-3.84 versus -12.88, p<0.001). Pre-NU hydronephrosis was associated with a lower post-NU CKD progression rate (33.1% versus 50.7%, p< 0.001) and was an independent protective factor for RF decline after covariate adjustment (OR=0.46, p<0.001). Patients with pre-NU hydronephrosis had a higher preserved eligibility rate for either adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (OR=3.09, 95%CI 1.95-4.69) or immune-oncology therapy (OR=2.31, 95%CI 1.23-4.34). Conclusion Pre-NU hydronephrosis is an independent protective predictor for post-NU RF decline, CKD progression, and eligibility for adjuvant therapy. With cautious selection for those unfavorably prognostic, non-metastatic UTUC patients with preoperative hydronephrosis, adjuvant rather than neoadjuvant therapy could be considered due to higher chance of preserving eligibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pai-Yu Cheng
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Divisions of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan.,Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Steven K Huang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Science Industries, College of Health Sciences, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Liang Liu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Shian-Shiang Wang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Shu Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Senior Citizen Service Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wun-Rong Lin
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jou Yeong-Chin
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Department of Health and Nutrition Biotechnology, Asian University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ian-Seng Cheong
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yu Khun Lee
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Hong Chen
- Department of Urology Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai branch, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.,Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.,Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Jie Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology and Graduate Institute of Biochemical and Biomedical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-You Huang
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-You Tsai
- Divisions of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Okumura K, Grace H, Sogawa H, Yamanaga S. Acute kidney injury and the compensation of kidney function after nephrectomy in living donation. World J Transplant 2022; 12:223-230. [PMID: 36159072 PMCID: PMC9453297 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v12.i8.223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence is growing rapidly, and AKI is one of the predictors of inpatient mortality. After nephrectomy, all the patients have decreased kidney function with AKI and recover from AKI. However, the characteristic and behavior of AKI is different from usual AKI and compensatory kidney function has been well known in the postoperative setting, especially in living donors. In this review, we have focused on the compensation of kidney function after nephrectomy in living donors. We discuss factors that have been identified as being associated with kidney recovery in donors including age, sex, body mass index, remnant kidney volume, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and various comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Okumura
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, United States
| | - Holly Grace
- Department of Surgery, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, United States
| | - Hiroshi Sogawa
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, United States
| | - Shigeyoshi Yamanaga
- Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto 861-8520, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Montgomery JR, Brown CS, Zondlak AN, Walsh KW, Kozlowski JE, Pinsky AM, Herriman EA, Sussman J, Lu Y, Stein EB, Shankar PR, Sung RS, Woodside KJ. CT-measured Cortical Volume Ratio Is an Accurate Alternative to Nuclear Medicine Split Scan Ratio Among Living Kidney Donors. Transplantation 2021; 105:2596-2605. [PMID: 33950636 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 125I-iothalamate clearance and 99mTc diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) split scan nuclear medicine studies are used among living kidney donor candidates to determine measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) and split scan ratio (SSR). The computerized tomography-derived cortical volume ratio (CVR) is a novel measurement of split kidney function and can be combined with predonation estimated GFR (eGFR) or mGFR to predict postdonation kidney function. Whether predonation SSR predicts postdonation kidney function better than predonation CVR and whether predonation mGFR provides additional information beyond predonation eGFR are unknown. METHODS We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of 204 patients who underwent kidney donation between June 2015 and March 2019. The primary outcome was 1-y postdonation eGFR. Model bases were created from a measure of predonation kidney function (mGFR or eGFR) multiplied by the proportion that each nondonated kidney contributed to predonation kidney function (SSR or CVR). Multivariable elastic net regression with 1000 repetitions was used to determine the mean and 95% confidence interval of R2, root mean square error (RMSE), and proportion overprediction ≥15 mL/min/1.73 m2 between models. RESULTS In validation cohorts, eGFR-CVR models performed best (R2, 0.547; RMSE, 9.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, proportion overprediction 3.1%), whereas mGFR-SSR models performed worst (R2, 0.360; RMSE, 10.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, proportion overprediction 7.2%) (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that predonation CVR may serve as an acceptable alternative to SSR during donor evaluation and furthermore, that a model based on CVR and predonation eGFR may be superior to other methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John R Montgomery
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Craig S Brown
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Kevin W Walsh
- Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | - Emily A Herriman
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jeremy Sussman
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Yee Lu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Erica B Stein
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Prasad R Shankar
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Michigan Radiology Quality Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Randall S Sung
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Kenneth J Woodside
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee CU, Ryoo H, Chung JH, Song W, Kang M, Sung HH, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Jeon HG. Preoperative versus Postoperative Compensation of the Contralateral Normal Kidney in Patients Treated with Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Clin Med 2021; 10:4918. [PMID: 34768437 PMCID: PMC8584614 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to identify the factors affecting renal compensatory processes that occur preoperatively as well as postoperatively in patients treated with radical nephrectomy (RNx) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the records of 906 patients treated with RNx for RCC. We defined the early compensatory process (process 1) as compensatory adaptation of the contralateral normal kidney (CNK) before RNx. We defined the late compensatory process (process 2) as compensatory adaptation of the CNK after RNx. Total compensation was defined as the combination of these two processes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify significant factors associated with processes 1, 2 and total compensation. RESULTS Mean preoperative, 1-week, and 5-year postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were 84.5, 57.6 and 63.7 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Female sex (p < 0.001), lower body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001), absence of hypertension (p = 0.019), lower preoperative eGFR (p < 0.001), larger tumor volume (p < 0.001), and larger CNK volume (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with process 1. Younger age (p = 0.019), higher BMI (p < 0.001), and absence of diabetes mellitus (DM) (p = 0.033) were significantly associated with process 2. Female sex (p < 0.001), younger age (p < 0.001), absence of DM (p = 0.002), lower preoperative eGFR (p < 0.001), and larger tumor (p = 0.001) and CNK volumes (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with total compensation. CONCLUSIONS Different factors affected each compensatory process. Process 1 made a greater contribution to the entire renal compensatory process than process 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chung-Un Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.-U.L.); (J.-H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.-H.S.); (B.-C.J.); (S.-I.S.); (S.-S.J.); (H.-M.L.)
| | - Hyunsoo Ryoo
- Department of Urology, VHS Medical Center, Seoul 05368, Korea;
| | - Jae-Hoon Chung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.-U.L.); (J.-H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.-H.S.); (B.-C.J.); (S.-I.S.); (S.-S.J.); (H.-M.L.)
| | - Wan Song
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.-U.L.); (J.-H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.-H.S.); (B.-C.J.); (S.-I.S.); (S.-S.J.); (H.-M.L.)
| | - Minyong Kang
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.-U.L.); (J.-H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.-H.S.); (B.-C.J.); (S.-I.S.); (S.-S.J.); (H.-M.L.)
| | - Hyun-Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.-U.L.); (J.-H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.-H.S.); (B.-C.J.); (S.-I.S.); (S.-S.J.); (H.-M.L.)
| | - Byong-Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.-U.L.); (J.-H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.-H.S.); (B.-C.J.); (S.-I.S.); (S.-S.J.); (H.-M.L.)
| | - Seong-Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.-U.L.); (J.-H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.-H.S.); (B.-C.J.); (S.-I.S.); (S.-S.J.); (H.-M.L.)
| | - Seong-Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.-U.L.); (J.-H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.-H.S.); (B.-C.J.); (S.-I.S.); (S.-S.J.); (H.-M.L.)
| | - Hyun-Moo Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.-U.L.); (J.-H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.-H.S.); (B.-C.J.); (S.-I.S.); (S.-S.J.); (H.-M.L.)
| | - Hwang-Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.-U.L.); (J.-H.C.); (W.S.); (M.K.); (H.-H.S.); (B.-C.J.); (S.-I.S.); (S.-S.J.); (H.-M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Capibaribe DM, Coelho MOS, Reis LO. How to draw the line between partial and radical nephrectomy. Int Braz J Urol 2021; 47:784-786. [PMID: 33848069 PMCID: PMC8321473 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0149.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Moreira Capibaribe
- Divisão de Oncologia Urológica, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - PUC-Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.,Laboratório de UroSciências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - PUC-Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.,Departamento de Urologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | - Marcos Oliveira Siebra Coelho
- Divisão de Oncologia Urológica, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - PUC-Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.,Laboratório de UroSciências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - PUC-Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.,Departamento de Urologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | - Leonardo O Reis
- Divisão de Oncologia Urológica, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - PUC-Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.,Laboratório de UroSciências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - PUC-Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.,Departamento de Urologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alvim R, Tin A, Nogueira L, Lebdai S, Wong N, Takeda T, Assel M, Hakimi AA, Touijer K, Russo P, Coleman J. A comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes in patients with pt3a renal cell carcinoma treated with partial and radical nephrectomy. Int Braz J Urol 2021; 47:777-783. [PMID: 33848068 PMCID: PMC8321499 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS Partial Nephrectomy is oncological safe in patients with pT3a RCC. PURPOSE To compare the oncological and functional outcomes of patients with pT3a RCC scheduled for PN and RN. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with pT3a N0 M0 RCC who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy from 2005 to 2016. Perioperative characteristics, including estimated glomerular filtration rate, tumor size, pathological histology, and RENAL nephrometry score, were compared between patients scheduled for partial or radical nephrectomy. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to compare overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival between planned procedure type. RESULTS Of the 589 patients, 369 (63%) and 220 (37%) were scheduled for radical and partial nephrectomy, respectively; 26 (12%) of the scheduled partial nephrectomy cases were intraoperatively converted to radical nephrectomy. After adjusting for tumor size and histology, there were no statistically significant differences in overall survival (hazard ratio 0.66; 95% CI, 0.38-1.13), cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio 0.53; 95% CI, 0.16-1.75), or recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 0.66; 95% CI, 0.34-1.28) between patients scheduled for partial or radical nephrectomy. Fewer patients scheduled for partial nephrectomy had estimated glomerular filtration rate reductions 3 to 9 months after surgery than patients scheduled for radical nephrectomy. CONCLUSION We found no evidence that patients scheduled to undergo partial nephrectomy had poorer oncologic outcomes than patients scheduled to undergo radical nephrectomy. In select patients with pT3a renal cell carcinoma in whom partial nephrectomy is deemed feasible by the surgeon, partial nephrectomy should not be discouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Alvim
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Amy Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Lucas Nogueira
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Souhil Lebdai
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Nathan Wong
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Toshikazu Takeda
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Melissa Assel
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - A Ari Hakimi
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Karim Touijer
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Paul Russo
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan Coleman
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Acute Kidney Injury Recovery Patterns in Critically Ill Patients: Results of a Retrospective Cohort Study. Crit Care Med 2021; 49:e683-e692. [PMID: 33826581 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Acute kidney injury, acute kidney injury severity, and acute kidney injury duration are associated with both short- and long-term outcomes. Despite recent definitions, only few studies assessed pattern of renal recovery and time-dependent competing risks are usually disregarded. Our objective was to describe pattern of acute kidney injury recovery, change of transition probability over time and their risk factors. DESIGN Monocenter retrospective cohort study. Acute kidney injury was defined according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes definition. Renal recovery was defined as normalization of both serum creatinine and urine output criteria. Competing risk analysis, time-inhomogeneous Markov model, and group-based trajectory modeling were performed. SETTING Monocenter study. PATIENTS Consecutive patients admitted in ICU from July 2018 to December 2018 were included. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Three-hundred fifty patients were included. Acute kidney injury occurred in 166 patients at ICU admission, including 64 patients (38.6%) classified as acute kidney disease according to Acute Disease Quality Initiative definition and 44 patients (26.5%) who could not be classified. Cumulative incidence of recovery was 25 % at day 2 (95% CI, 18-32%) and 35% at day 7 (95% CI, 28-42%). After adjustment, need for mechanical ventilation (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.74) and severity of the acute kidney injury (stage 3 vs stage 1 subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03-0.35) were associated with lack of recovery. Group-based trajectory modeling identified three clusters of temporal changes in this setting, associated with both acute kidney injury recovery and patients' outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we demonstrate Acute Disease Quality Initiative to allow recovery pattern classification in 75% of critically ill patients. Our study underlines the need to take into account competing risk factors when assessing recovery pattern in critically ill patients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Rosenzweig B, Recabal P, Gluck C, Coleman JA, Susztak K, Hakimi AA, Jaimes EA, Weiss RH. Can kidney parenchyma metabolites serve as prognostic biomarkers for long-term kidney function after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma? A preliminary study. Clin Kidney J 2021; 14:656-664. [PMID: 35261758 PMCID: PMC8894921 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Nephrectomy, the standard of care for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), may lead to kidney function loss. Our goal was to identify prognostic biomarkers of postoperative renal function using metabolomics. Methods Metabolomics data from benign kidney parenchyma were collected prospectively from 138 patients with RCC who underwent nephrectomy at a single institution. The primary endpoint was the difference between the postoperative and preoperative estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) rate divided by the elapsed time (eGFR slope). eGFR slope was calculated ∼2 years post-nephrectomy (GFR1), and at last follow-up (GFR2). A multivariate regularized regression model identified clinical characteristics and abundance of metabolites in baseline benign kidney parenchyma that were significantly associated with eGFR slope. Findings were validated by associating gene expression data with eGFR slope in an independent cohort (n = 58). Results Data were compiled on 78 patients (median age 62.6 years, 65.4% males). The mean follow-up was 25 ± 3.4 months for GFR1 and 69.5 ± 23.5 months for GFR2 and 17 (22%) and 32 (41%) patients showed eGFR recovery, respectively. Nephrectomy type, blood lipids, gender and 23 metabolites from benign parenchyma were significantly associated with eGFR slope. Some metabolites associated with eGFR slope overlapped with previously reported chronic kidney disease-related processes. Subgroup analysis identified unique ‘metabolite signatures’ by older age, nephrectomy type and preoperative eGFR. Conclusions Nephrectomy type, gender, blood lipids and benign parenchyma metabolites at nephrectomy were associated with long-term kidney function. On further study, these metabolites may be useful as potential biomarkers and to identify novel therapeutic targets for malignancy-associated renal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barak Rosenzweig
- Department of Surgery, Urology Services, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- The Dr. Pinchas Borenstein Talpiot Medical Leadership Program 2013, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Pedro Recabal
- Department of Surgery, Urology Services, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Urology Service, Fundacion Arturo Lopez Perez, Santiago, Chile
| | - Caroline Gluck
- Department of Medicine, Renal Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan A Coleman
- Department of Surgery, Urology Services, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katalin Susztak
- Department of Medicine, Renal Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - A Ari Hakimi
- Department of Surgery, Urology Services, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edgar A Jaimes
- Renal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert H Weiss
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Silagy A, Zabor E, Mano R, DiNatale R, Marcon J, Kashani M, Blum K, Reznik E, Jaimes E, Coleman J, Ari Hakimi A, Russo P. Predictors of long-term renal function after kidney surgery for patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease. Can Urol Assoc J 2020; 15:E103-E109. [PMID: 32744993 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We evaluated the trajectory of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after kidney surgery in patients with kidney cancer and chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS We identified 1204 consecutive patients in our institutional database with preoperative CKD undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy from 1998-2016. Postoperative eGFR was tracked, with patients censored when receiving dialysis or kidney transplantation. A multivariable mixed-effects models assessed associations between preoperative baseline patient and tumor characteristics, and longitudinal eGFR. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression were used to estimate overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and cumulative incidence of dialysis. RESULTS Preoperatively, 892 (74.1%), 271 (22.5%), and 41 (3.4%) patients had CKD stage 3a, 3b, and 4/5, respectively. There were 55 patients dialyzed and 355 deaths (99 from kidney cancer). Median followup was 8.1 years, with 25 781 postoperative eGFR measurements. Factors associated with decreasing eGFR postoperatively included radical nephrectomy, male gender, older age, increased body mass index (BMI), and cardiovascular risk factors. We observed a significant interaction effect between time from surgery and preoperative CKD stage: the eGFR of stage 3a patients improved, while stage ≥3b declined (p<0.001). The two-year and five-year cumulative incidence of dialysis was 1.8% (1.1-2.6%) and 3.1% (2.2-4.2%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of dialysis, with death as a competing event, significantly differed by preoperative CKD stage. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative CKD stage ≥3b is independently associated with a higher risk of declining renal function, dialysis, and mortality. With careful selection, patients with preoperative CKD withstand kidney surgery with low rates of dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Silagy
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Emily Zabor
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Roy Mano
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Renzo DiNatale
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Julian Marcon
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mahyar Kashani
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kyle Blum
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Eduard Reznik
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Edgar Jaimes
- Renal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan Coleman
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - A Ari Hakimi
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Paul Russo
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Approximately 70% of cases of kidney cancer are localized or locally advanced at diagnosis. Among patients who undergo surgery for these cancers, 30-35% will eventually develop potentially fatal metachronous distant metastases. Effective adjuvant treatments are urgently needed to reduce the risk of recurrence of kidney cancer and of dying of metastatic disease. To date, almost all of the tested adjuvant agents have failed to demonstrate any benefit. Only two trials of an autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib have shown positive results, but these have been criticized for methodological reasons and conflicting data, respectively. The results of two additional trials of targeted agents as adjuvant therapies have not yet been published. Novel immune checkpoint inhibitors are promising approaches to adjuvant therapy in kidney cancer, and a number of trials are now underway. An important component of the management of patients with kidney cancer, particularly those who undergo radical resection for localized renal cell carcinoma, is the preservation of kidney function to reduce morbidity and mortality. The optimal management of these patients therefore requires a multidisciplinary approach involving nephrologists, oncologists, urologists and pathologists.
Collapse
|
13
|
Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 1-organ-sparing procedures in renal and adrenal tumors: a systematic review. Int Urol Nephrol 2019; 51:377-393. [PMID: 30623290 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-018-02070-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for the kidney and adrenals has emerged as the need for preservation of function is paramount in patients with poor functional reserve. As reports increasingly showed that oncological outcomes were equivalent to radical excision, elective OSS became a viable alternative in patients with otherwise normal reserve. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of OSS for adrenal and renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library Central Search were searched for recently published articles up to December 2017. The following keywords were used; "partial adrenalectomy", "adrenal sparing", "partial nephrectomy", "nephron sparing", "kidney/renal cancer". RESULTS Partial adrenalectomy became an attractive alternative to total adrenalectomy avoiding adrenal insufficiency. Both minimally invasive surgery and ablative techniques were increasingly reported for adrenal OSS with adequate residual adrenal function and excellent oncological outcome. Radical nephrectomy remained for many years as the gold standard of treatment for organ-confined renal cell carcinoma. As the need to reduce the impact on renal function, more conservative approaches were utilized. Soon, the non-inferiority of nephron-sparing surgery to that of radical excision became evident and elective partial nephrectomy was gaining ground as the standard of care for small renal masses in patients with normal contralateral kidneys. CONCLUSIONS Herein, we present a comprehensive review of the current status of OSS in renal and adrenal tumors.
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang Z, Liu C, Chen R, Liu S, Feng C, Yu K, Zeng X. Will the kidney function be reduced in patients with renal cell carcinoma following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? Baseline eGFR, warm ischemia time, and RENAL nephrometry score could tell. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:498.e15-498.e24. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Revised: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
15
|
Ristau BT, Handorf EA, Cahn DB, Kutikov A, Uzzo RG, Smaldone MC. Partial nephrectomy is not associated with an overall survival advantage over radical nephrectomy in elderly patients with stage Ib-II renal masses: An analysis of the national cancer data base. Cancer 2018; 124:3839-3848. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 01/01/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin T. Ristau
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth A. Handorf
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - David B. Cahn
- Urologic Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Robert G. Uzzo
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Marc C. Smaldone
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Charytoniuk T, Małyszko M, Bączek J, Fiedorczuk P, Siedlaczek K, Małyszko J. Progression to chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing nephrectomy for small renal masses: a price to pay for a therapeutic success? Postgrad Med 2018; 130:613-620. [PMID: 30106608 DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2018.1511211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Nephrectomy, which constitutes a gold-standard procedure for the treatment of renal-cell carcinoma (RCC), has been widely discussed in the past decade as a significant risk factor of the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD). RCC is the third most common genitourinary cancer in the United States, with an estimated more than 65,000 new cases and 14,970 deaths. The aim of this review was to precisely and comprehensively summarize the status of current knowledge in CKD risk factors after nephrectomy, the advantages of minimally invasive vs. radical nephrectomy, post-nephrectomy biomarkers of CKD, ways of post-operative CKD prevention and, therefore, better understand why various aspects of CKD after nephrectomy. The majority of current studies indicated a better long-term kidney function preservation in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy in comparison to those after radical nephrectomy. Furthermore, a nephron-sparing surgery should be a preferred first-line procedure among young patients with small renal masses. As partial nephrectomy is followed by a greater risk of adverse outcomes relative to radical nephrectomy, a potential survival benefit should always be considered especially in the elderly or patients with comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Charytoniuk
- a 2nd Department of Nephrology , Medical University of Bialystok , Bialystok , Poland
| | - Maciej Małyszko
- a 2nd Department of Nephrology , Medical University of Bialystok , Bialystok , Poland
| | - Jan Bączek
- a 2nd Department of Nephrology , Medical University of Bialystok , Bialystok , Poland
| | - Piotr Fiedorczuk
- a 2nd Department of Nephrology , Medical University of Bialystok , Bialystok , Poland
| | - Karolina Siedlaczek
- a 2nd Department of Nephrology , Medical University of Bialystok , Bialystok , Poland
| | - Jolanta Małyszko
- a 2nd Department of Nephrology , Medical University of Bialystok , Bialystok , Poland.,b Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Internal Medicine , Warsaw Medical University , Warsaw , Poland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ellis RJ, Cho Y, Del Vecchio SJ, McStea M, Morais C, Coombes JS, Wood ST, Gobe GC, Francis RS. Outcome Measures Used to Report Kidney Function in Studies Investigating Surgical Management of Kidney Tumours: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 5:1074-1084. [PMID: 29728307 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Revised: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Most practice decisions relevant to preserving kidney function in patients managed surgically for kidney tumours are driven by observational studies. A wide range of outcome measures are used in these studies, which reduces comparability and increases the risk of reporting bias. OBJECTIVE To comprehensively and succinctly describe the outcomes used to evaluate kidney function in studies evaluating surgical management of kidney tumours. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Electronic search of the PubMed database was conducted to identify studies with at least one measure of kidney function in patients managed surgically for kidney tumours, published between January 2000 and September 2017. Abstracts were initially screened for eligibility. Full texts of articles were then evaluated in more detail for inclusion. A narrative synthesis of the evidence was conducted. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 312 studies, involving 127905 participants, were included in this review. Most were retrospective (n=274) studies and conducted in a single centre (n=264). Overall, 78 unique outcome measures were identified, which were grouped into six outcome categories. Absolute postoperative kidney function (n=187), relative kidney function (n=181), and postoperative chronic kidney disease (n=131) were most frequently reported. Kidney function was predominantly quantified using estimated glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance (n=255), most using the modification of diet in renal disease equation (n=182). Only 70 studies provided rationale for specific outcome measures used. CONCLUSIONS There is significant variability in the reporting and quantification of kidney function in studies evaluating patients managed surgically for kidney tumours. A standardised approach to measuring and reporting kidney function will increase the effectiveness of outcomes reported and improve relevance of research findings within a clinical context. PATIENT SUMMARY Although we know that the removal of a kidney can reduce kidney function, clinical significance of various approaches is a matter of debate. This article demonstrates significant variability in the way kidney function was reported across all studies of patients with kidney cancer undergoing surgery, indicating a need for standardisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Ellis
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sharon J Del Vecchio
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Megan McStea
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Christudas Morais
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jeff S Coombes
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; NHMRC Chronic Kidney Disease Centre for Research Excellence, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Simon T Wood
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Glenda C Gobe
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; NHMRC Chronic Kidney Disease Centre for Research Excellence, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Ross S Francis
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Winer AG, Zabor EC, Vacchio MJ, Hakimi AA, Russo P, Coleman JA, Jaimes EA. The Effect of Patient and Surgical Characteristics on Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2018; 16:191-196. [PMID: 29325738 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Revised: 11/09/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of the study was to identify patient and disease characteristics that have an adverse effect on renal function after partial nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 387 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy for renal tumors between 2006 and 2014. A line plot with a locally weighted scatterplot smoothing was generated to visually assess renal function over time. Univariable and multivariable longitudinal regression analyses incorporated a random intercept and slope to evaluate the association between patient and disease characteristics with renal function after surgery. RESULTS Median age was 60 years and most patients were male (255 patients [65.9%]) and white (343 patients [88.6%]). In univariable analysis, advanced age at surgery, larger tumor size, male sex, longer ischemia time, history of smoking, and hypertension were significantly associated with lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In multivariable analysis, independent predictors of reduced renal function after surgery included advanced age, lower preoperative eGFR, and longer ischemia time. Length of time from surgery was strongly associated with improvement in renal function among all patients. CONCLUSION Independent predictors of postoperative decline in renal function include advanced age, lower preoperative eGFR, and longer ischemia time. A substantial number of subjects had recovery in renal function over time after surgery, which continued past the 12-month mark. These findings suggest that patients who undergo partial nephrectomy can experience long-term improvement in renal function. This improvement is most pronounced among younger patients with higher preoperative eGFR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew G Winer
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Emily C Zabor
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael J Vacchio
- Urology Service at the Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - A Ari Hakimi
- Urology Service at the Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Paul Russo
- Urology Service at the Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jonathan A Coleman
- Urology Service at the Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Edgar A Jaimes
- Department of Medicine, Nephrology Division, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Renal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee BH, Zabor EC, Tennenbaum D, Furberg H, Benfante N, Coleman JA, Jaimes EA, Russo P. Renal function recovery after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2017; 36:257-263. [PMID: 29209771 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2139-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To understand the longitudinal renal function trends in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and identify clinicopathologic characteristics associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) recovery. METHODS 147 patients were available for analysis. Longitudinal eGFR trends were assessed by plotting each patient's eGFR measurements over time. The patient population was dichotomized using eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 versus ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Cumulative incidence and competing risk regression analysis were used to estimate recovery of postoperative eGFR to the preoperative level and identify clinicopathologic characteristics associated with eGFR recovery. RESULTS Median age was 68.7 years and median preoperative eGFR was 55.9 ml/min/1.73 m2. 63.6% were male and 95.8% were white. The cumulative incidence of eGFR recovery was significantly higher in patients with baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 compared to those with baseline eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.01), with recovery rates at 2 years of 56.6% vs. 27.7%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that preoperative hydronephrosis (HR 1.80) and preoperative eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (HR 1.87) were associated with increased chance of eGFR recovery. CONCLUSION Over half of patients with preoperative eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 achieved eGFR recovery within the first 3 years after RNU, and hydronephrosis was a significant predictor of recovery. These findings should be considered when counseling patients regarding chronic kidney disease progression after RNU and timing of perioperative chemotherapy for high risk tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byron H Lee
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Emily C Zabor
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Daniel Tennenbaum
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Helena Furberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Nicole Benfante
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Jonathan A Coleman
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Edgar A Jaimes
- Department of Medicine, Renal Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Paul Russo
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zabor EC, Furberg H, Lee B, Campbell S, Lane BR, Thompson RH, Antonio EC, Noyes SL, Zaid H, Jaimes EA, Russo P. Long-Term Renal Function Recovery following Radical Nephrectomy for Kidney Cancer: Results from a Multicenter Confirmatory Study. J Urol 2017; 199:921-926. [PMID: 29066363 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to confirm the findings from a previous single institution study of 572 patients from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in which we found that 49% of patients recovered to the preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate within 2 years following radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multicenter retrospective study was performed in 1,928 patients using data contributed from 3 independent centers. The outcome of interest was postoperative recovery to the preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate. Data were analyzed using cumulative incidence and competing risks regression with death from any cause treated as a competing event. RESULTS This study demonstrated that 45% of patients had recovered to the preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate by 2 years following radical nephrectomy. Furthermore, this study confirmed that recovery of renal function differed according to preoperative renal function such that patients with a lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate had an increased chance of recovery. This study also suggested that larger tumor size and female gender were significantly associated with an increased chance of renal function recovery. CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter retrospective study we confirmed that in the long term a large proportion of patients recover to preoperative renal function following radical nephrectomy for kidney tumors. Recovery is more likely among those with a lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Zabor
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Helena Furberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Byron Lee
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Steven Campbell
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Brian R Lane
- Urologic Oncology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | | | - Elvis Caraballo Antonio
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Harras Zaid
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Edgar A Jaimes
- Renal Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul Russo
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ellis RJ, Del Vecchio SJ, Ng KL, Dimeski G, Pascoe EM, Hawley CM, Johnson DW, Vesey DA, Coombes JS, Morais C, Francis RS, Wood ST, Gobe GC. Factors associated with acutely elevated serum creatinine following radical tumour nephrectomy: the Correlates of Kidney Dysfunction-Tumour Nephrectomy Database study. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6:899-909. [PMID: 29184790 PMCID: PMC5673817 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.08.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To identify factors associated with acutely elevated serum creatinine (SCr) within 7 days of radical tumour nephrectomy. METHODS The study population consisted of 130 consecutive patients managed for renal tumours. The primary outcome was acute kidney injury (AKI) (defined as SCr increase ≥50% above baseline), assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The secondary outcome was SCr percentage increase, assessed using multivariable linear regression analysis. RESULTS Following nephrectomy, the mean percentage increase in SCr in the first week was 55%±29%, and 77 (59%) patients experienced AKI. Independent predictors of AKI post-nephrectomy were male gender [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 2.67; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.01, 6.93], urine albumin-creatinine ratio (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.91), preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.05), laparoscopic nephrectomy (OR: 3.02; 95% CI: 1.00, 9.12), and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (OR: 2.93; 95% CI: 1.04, 8.29). Independent predictors of a SCr increase were male gender (β: 12.0; 95% CI: 2.69, 21.3), urine albumin-creatinine ratio (β: -3.36; 95% CI: -6.55, -0.16), preoperative eGFR (β: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.66), laparoscopic nephrectomy (β: 12.7; 95% CI: 1.05, 24.3) and obesity (β: 9.94, 95% CI: 0.61, 19.3). CONCLUSIONS Male gender, albuminuria, eGFR and laparoscopic nephrectomy independently associated with acutely elevated serum creatinine following radical tumour nephrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J. Ellis
- Kidney Disease Research Group, Diamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sharon J. Del Vecchio
- Kidney Disease Research Group, Diamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Keng Lim Ng
- Kidney Disease Research Group, Diamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Goce Dimeski
- Kidney Disease Research Group, Diamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Chemical Pathology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Elaine M. Pascoe
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Carmel M. Hawley
- Kidney Disease Research Group, Diamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - David W. Johnson
- Kidney Disease Research Group, Diamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - David A. Vesey
- Kidney Disease Research Group, Diamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jeff S. Coombes
- UQ NHMRC Chronic Kidney Disease Centre for Research Excellence (CKD.QLD), Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Christudas Morais
- Kidney Disease Research Group, Diamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Ross S. Francis
- Kidney Disease Research Group, Diamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Simon T. Wood
- Kidney Disease Research Group, Diamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Glenda C. Gobe
- Kidney Disease Research Group, Diamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- UQ NHMRC Chronic Kidney Disease Centre for Research Excellence (CKD.QLD), Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zabell J, Demirjian S, Lane BR, Derweesh IH, Isharwal S, Suk-Ouichai C, Wu J, Palacios DA, Campbell SC. Predictors of Long-Term Survival after Renal Cancer Surgery. J Urol 2017; 199:384-392. [PMID: 28859893 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Renal cancer surgery can adversely impact long-term function and survival. We evaluated predictors of chronic kidney disease 5 years and nonrenal cancer mortality 10 years after renal cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed the records of 4,283 patients who underwent renal cancer surgery from 1997 to 2008. Radical and partial nephrectomy were performed in 46% and 54% of patients, respectively. Cumulative probability ordinal modeling was used to predict chronic kidney disease status 5 years after surgery and multivariable logistic regression was used to predict nonrenal cancer mortality at 10 years. Relevant patient, tumor and functional covariates were incorporated, including the preoperative glomerular filtration rate (A), the new baseline glomerular filtration rate after surgery (B) and the glomerular filtration rate loss related to surgery (C), that is C = A - B. In contrast, partial or radical nephrectomy was not used in the models due to concerns about strong selection bias associated with the choice of procedure. RESULTS Multivariable modeling established the preoperative glomerular filtration rate and the glomerular filtration rate loss related to surgery as the most important predictors of the development of chronic kidney disease (Spearman ρ = 0.78). Age, gender and race had secondary roles. Significant predictors of 10-year nonrenal cancer mortality were the preoperative glomerular filtration rate, the new baseline glomerular filtration rate, age, diabetes and heart disease (all p <0.05). Multivariable modeling established age and the preoperative glomerular filtration rate as the most important predictors of 10-year nonrenal cancer mortality (c-index 0.71) while the glomerular filtration rate loss related to surgery only changed absolute mortality estimates 1% to 3%. CONCLUSIONS Glomerular filtration rate loss related to renal cancer surgery, whether due to partial or radical nephrectomy, influences the risk of chronic kidney disease but it may have less impact on survival. In contrast, age and the preoperative glomerular filtration rate, which reflects general health status, are more robust predictors of nonrenal cancer mortality, at least in patients with good preoperative function or mild chronic kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Zabell
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sevag Demirjian
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Brian R Lane
- Department of Urology, Spectrum Health Medical Group, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Diego Health System, San Diego, California
| | - Sudhir Isharwal
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Chalairat Suk-Ouichai
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Jitao Wu
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Urology, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | | | - Steven C Campbell
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ellis RJ, Joshi A, Ng KL, Francis RS, Gobe GC, Wood ST. Optimising assessment of kidney function when managing localised renal masses. Med J Aust 2017; 207:127-133. [DOI: 10.5694/mja17.00161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Accepted: 04/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Ellis
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD
| | - Andre Joshi
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD
- Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD
| | - Keng L Ng
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD
| | - Ross S Francis
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD
| | - Glenda C Gobe
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD
- NHMRC Chronic Kidney Disease Centre for Research Excellence (CKD.QLD), University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD
| | - Simon T Wood
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Shingarev R, Jaimes EA. Renal cell carcinoma: new insights and challenges for a clinician scientist. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2017; 313:F145-F154. [PMID: 28381462 PMCID: PMC5582896 DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00480.2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Revised: 03/22/2017] [Accepted: 03/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a growing recognition of the complex interplay between renal cell cancer (RCC), kidney function, mechanical reduction of nephron mass, and systemic agents targeting the cancer. Earlier detection of RCC and rising life expectancy of cancer survivors places a greater emphasis on preservation of renal function after cancer resection and during systemic therapy. Unique adverse effects associated with RCC drugs not only help reveal cancer pathophysiology but also expand our knowledge of normal cell signaling and metabolism. In this review, we outline our current understanding of RCC biology and treatment, their bidirectional relationship with kidney function, and unmet research needs in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Shingarev
- Renal Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Edgar A Jaimes
- Renal Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Dey S, Hamilton Z, Noyes SL, Tobert CM, Keeley J, Derweesh IH, Lane BR. Chronic Kidney Disease Is More Common in Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Urology 2017; 105:101-107. [PMID: 28365357 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.03.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Revised: 03/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To retrospectively evaluate clinical predictors of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients to identify associations between patient- and tumor-specific factors with poorer renal function. CKD and RCC are interrelated, with 26%-44% of RCC patients having concomitant CKD at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Institutional registries from Spectrum Health and University of California, San Diego, were queried for preoperative glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria status before radical or partial nephrectomy. Preoperative clinical and tumor factors were recorded; proteinuria was classified as A1 (<30 mg), A2 (30-300 mg), and A3 (>300 mg). CKD was grouped by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes classification (low, moderately increased, high, very high). RESULTS We evaluated 1569 patients undergoing surgery for renal cortical tumors. CKD status was low risk in 860 (55%), moderately increased in 381 (24%), high in 194 (12%), and very high in 134 (9%) patients. Increased radius, exophytic or endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to the collecting system or sinus in millimeters, anterior or posterior, location relative to polar lines score, tumor size, and clinical tumor stage were strongly associated with increased CKD risk at baseline. Clinical stage T3/T4 disease had more at-risk patients than stages T2 and T1 disease (39.5% vs 22% and 19%, P = .0001). Clinical tumor stage and gender were the only predictors of proteinuria, lower glomerular filtration rate, and higher CKD risk group in both univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION Forty-five percent of patients with RCC had moderate or higher CKD before treatment. A positive correlation between pretreatment CKD and locally advanced RCC (cT3/T4) was present. This likely relates to increased loss of functional parenchyma with increasing tumor size or stage, with important implications in patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumi Dey
- Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Brian R Lane
- Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Finelli A, Ismaila N, Bro B, Durack J, Eggener S, Evans A, Gill I, Graham D, Huang W, Jewett MAS, Latcha S, Lowrance W, Rosner M, Shayegan B, Thompson RH, Uzzo R, Russo P. Management of Small Renal Masses: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:668-680. [PMID: 28095147 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.69.9645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 232] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To provide recommendations for the management options for patients with small renal masses (SRMs). Methods By using a literature search and prospectively defined study selection, we sought systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, prospective comparative observational studies, and retrospective studies published from 2000 through 2015. Outcomes included recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival. Results Eighty-three studies, including 20 systematic reviews and 63 primary studies, met the eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the guideline recommendations. Recommendations On the basis of tumor-specific findings and competing risks of mortality, all patients with an SRM should be considered for a biopsy when the results may alter management. Active surveillance should be an initial management option for patients who have significant comorbidities and limited life expectancy. Partial nephrectomy (PN) for SRMs is the standard treatment that should be offered to all patients for whom an intervention is indicated and who possess a tumor that is amenable to this approach. Percutaneous thermal ablation should be considered an option if complete ablation can reliably be achieved. Radical nephrectomy for SRMs should only be reserved for patients who possess a tumor of significant complexity that is not amenable to PN or for whom PN may result in unacceptable morbidity even when performed at centers with expertise. Referral to a nephrologist should be considered if chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2) or progressive chronic kidney disease occurs after treatment, especially if associated with proteinuria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Finelli
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Bill Bro
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeremy Durack
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Scott Eggener
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Andrew Evans
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Inderbir Gill
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David Graham
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William Huang
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sheron Latcha
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William Lowrance
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mitchell Rosner
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Bobby Shayegan
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - R Houston Thompson
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Robert Uzzo
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Paul Russo
- Antonio Finelli and Michael A.S. Jewett, Princess Margaret Cancer Center; Andrew Evans, University Health Network, Toronto; Bobby Shayegan, St Joseph Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Mitchell Rosner, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; Bill Bro, Kidney Cancer Association; Scott Eggener, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Jeremy Durack, Sheron Latcha, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; William Huang, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Inderbir Gill, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; David Graham, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC; William Lowrance, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; R. Houston Thompson, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Russo P. Editorial Comment. Urology 2016; 93:129. [PMID: 27158030 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Russo
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|