Switching from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to a belatacept-based regimen in renal transplant recipients: a randomized phase II study

Calcineurin Inhibitor Associated Nephrotoxicity in Kidney Transplantation-A Transplant Nephrologist's Perspective

AIM

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have revolutionized transplant medicine, improving allograft survival but posing challenges like calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity (CNT). Acute CNT, often dose-dependent, leads to vasoconstriction and acute kidney injury, with treatment focusing on CNI exposure reduction. Chronic CNT manifests as progressive allograft function decline, with challenges in distinguishing it from nonspecific allograft nephropathy.

METHODS

This narrative review provides a concise overview of the clinical management of CNT, covering acute and chronic CNT. We reviewed original articles, landmark papers, and meta-analyses on CNT mitigation strategies, including CNI-sparing approaches.

RESULTS

Preventive measures include co-medications, CNI exposure monitoring, and CNI sparing strategies, such as reducing target trough levels and converting to mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) or belatacept. Despite improvements in graft function, challenges persist in demonstrating significant differences in allograft survival with CNI-sparing regimens. The paradigm shift from chronic CNT as the main cause of chronic allograft nephropathy toward rather immunologic triggered injuries and/or comorbidities as relevant contributors to allograft deterioration over time must be kept in mind.

CONCLUSION

CNIs have significantly improved kidney transplant outcomes, but their associated nephrotoxicity necessitates mitigation strategies. The decision to implement such regimens is always an individual choice balancing against the risk of immunologic injuries. Further long-term studies are needed to optimize immunosuppressive approaches and refine CNT management.

Costimulation blockade: the next generation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are central to immunosuppression in kidney transplantation (KT), improving short-term outcomes but falling short in enhancing long-term outcomes due to cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal complications. Belatacept, an FDA-approved costimulation blocker, offers a less toxic alternative to CNIs but is limited by its intravenous administration and reduced efficacy in high-immunological-risk patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging therapies target more specific pathways to improve efficacy and accessibility. Abatacept, a first-generation cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) immunoglobulin, has shown favorable outcomes in small studies. VEL-101 and Lulizumab selectively block CD28 while preserving CTLA-4 signaling, showing promise in early trials. In the CD40/CD40L pathway, results have been mixed. Iscalimab (CD40 antibody) was inferior to tacrolimus in Phase 2 trials, and Bleselumab (CD40 antibody) showed variable rejection rates despite being noninferior to tacrolimus. CD40L-targeting agents such as TNX-1500, Tegoprubart, and Dazodalibep have demonstrated promising efficacy and safety in rejection prophylaxis.

SUMMARY

The focus in transplantation is shifting toward safer, long-term therapies with greater accessibility. Investigational agents with subcutaneous delivery methods could overcome logistical challenges, improve adherence, and redefine posttransplant care. These advancements in costimulation blockade may enhance long-term graft survival and transform the management of KT recipients.

Long-Term Outcomes of Belatacept Versus Tacrolimus Following T-Cell Depleting Induction in Adult Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Belatacept shows promise as an alternative immunosuppressant without the nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors. Avoiding nephrotoxicity is important with the expanding use of organs at risk of marginal graft function. To date, no large studies have compared belatacept directly with tacrolimus after T-cell depleting induction in renal transplantation.

METHODS

The Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file was used to compare adult kidney transplant recipients induced with T-cell depleting agents treated with belatacept to propensity score-matched recipients treated with tacrolimus between August 10, 2011 and June 29, 2023. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare death censored graft survival, patient survival, and time to acute rejection.

RESULTS

During the study period, 4391 adult kidney transplant recipients were treated with belatacept. Estimated GFR improved for belatacept-treated patients through year 9, whereas it decreased for the control group through year 10. Belatacept-treated patients had a higher rejection rate at 5 years (21% vs. 15%, p < 0.001). Death-censored graft survival did not differ between groups (p = 0.383). Among patients who had rejection, death-censored graft survival was superior in belatacept-treated patients at 5 years (70% vs. 60%, p = 0.026). Overall, patient survival did not differ between groups (p = 0.120).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest longitudinal study to compare outcomes of belatacept versus tacrolimus-based therapy following T-cell depleting induction. Belatacept was associated with improved graft function despite an increased acute rejection rate. There was no difference in overall graft or patient survival compared to tacrolimus. This study suggests that belatacept-based therapy is not inferior to tacrolimus-based therapy following T-cell depletion.

Toxoplasma Gondii Replication During Belatacept Treatment in Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature

Belatacept is a chimeric protein that acts as a selective blocker of T-lymphocyte co-stimulation. It has been proposed for the prevention of kidney transplant rejection. This paper reports a literature review on pharmacological characteristics of belatacept and genetic factors influencing its efficacy and safety profile. A severe case of neurotoxoplasmosis observed in a kidney transplant recipient (KTR) treated with belatacept is also described. It appears that the interference of belatacept on guanylate binding proteins (GBPs) expression in antigen-presenting cells (APC) cytoplasm could be involved in Toxoplasma gondii (Toxo-g) reactivation in seropositive KTRs. Additionally, genetic variations in immune regulatory genes encoding CTLA-4 and Blimp-1 may influence individual susceptibility to infection and immune modulation under belatacept therapy. In conclusion, we highlight the importance of drug avoidance and/or increased surveillance in Toxo-g IgG-positive KTR. We also retain that further studies on the host defense pathways involved in the surveillance of opportunistic pathogens in KTR are strongly desirable.

New Immunosuppressants in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: What's in the Pipeline for Kids?

The 1- and 5-year patient and graft survival rates of pediatric kidney transplant recipients have improved considerably in recent years. Regardless of early success, kidney transplantation is challenged by suboptimal long-term allograft and patient survival. Many kidney transplants are lost due to immune (rejection) and nonimmune allograft injuries, and patient survival is limited from cardiovascular disease, infection, and malignancy. Many of these co-morbidities are due to side effects of the currently available immunosuppressive drugs, especially calcineurin inhibitors and glucocorticoids, which are associated with long-term toxicity. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop new, more specific and less toxic immunosuppressive drugs. Unfortunately, there have also been no new drug approvals for adult kidney transplant recipients since belatacept in 2012, leaving the immunosuppressive drug armamentarium unchanged for more than 20 years. As a consequence of the lack of innovation in adult kidney transplant recipients, the pipeline of novel immunosuppressive agents for pediatric solid organ transplant recipients is also limited. The most promising agent in the near future, at least for adolescent patients, appears to be belatacept, despite its many limitations. In this review article, we report on three areas that appear to be the most relevant topics at this time: (i) extended-release tacrolimus, (ii) costimulation blockade with belatacept, and (iii) treatment of antibody-mediated rejection. Improved synergies between the pharmaceutical industry and the transplant community are needed to achieve the ultimate goal of improving long-term outcomes in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Tacrolimus to belatacept conversion in proteinuric kidney transplant recipients

Background

Proteinuria is associated with worse allograft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and treatment strategies are limited. We examined the outcomes of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to belatacept conversion in proteinuric KTRs.

Methods

In a pilot phase II single-arm multicenter prospective trial, we recruited adult KTRs >6 months post-kidney transplantation with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30 ml/min/1.73m2 and proteinuria >1 g/day. Patients were converted from CNI to belatacept. The primary outcome was a 25% reduction in proteinuria at 12 months.

Results

A total of 15 KTRs were recruited who had pre-conversion median (interquartile range) proteinuria of 1.8 (IQR 1.4 - 3.5) g/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 48 (IQR 32 - 52.5) ml/min/1.73m2. At 12 months post-conversion, median proteinuria was 1.4 (IQR 0.4 - 2.2) g/g (P = 0.068) and eGFR was maintained at 43 (34 - 54.5) ml/min/1.73m2. The primary outcome of at least a 25% reduction in proteinuria occurred in 53% (8/15) at 12 months. Abbreviated IBOX scores predicting 7-year graft survival were also stable at 1-year post-conversion compared to baseline. At extended follow-up at 5 years, both proteinuria and eGFR remained stable at 0.69 (0.24 - 2.15) g/g and 39 (31 - 57) ml/min/1.73m2, respectively.

Conclusions

CNI to belatacept conversion was associated with preserved allograft function in KTRs with significant proteinuria. These findings need to be confirmed in a larger randomized clinical trial.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT0232740.

Biopsy-Proven T-Cell Mediated Rejection After Belatacept Rescue Conversion: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

After kidney transplantation, conversion to belatacept is a promising alternative in patients with poor graft function or intolerance to calcineurin inhibitors. The risk of acute rejection has not been well described under these conditions. Here we present a retrospective multicenter study investigating the occurrence of acute rejection after conversion in 901 patients (2011-2021). The incidence of cellular and humoral rejection was 5.2% and 0.9%, respectively. T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) occurred after a median of 2.6 months after conversion. Out of 47 patients with TCMR, death-censored graft survival was 70.1%, 55.1% and 50.8% at 1 year, 3 years and 5 years post-rejection, respectively. Eight patients died after rejection, mainly from infectious diseases. We compared these 47 patients with a cohort of kidney transplant recipients who were converted to belatacept between 2011 and 2017 and did not develop rejection (n = 238). In multivariate analysis, shorter time between KT and conversion, and the absence of anti-thymocyte globulin induction after KT were associated with the occurrence of TCMR after belatacept conversion. The occurrence of rejection after conversion to belatacept appeared to be less frequent than with de novo use. Nevertheless, the risk of graft loss could be significant in patients with already low renal function.

Transplant Nephrology

The progressive rise in the number of kidney transplant recipients in the last 2 decades is reflective of the technological advances in the field. Nephrologists are responsible for providing long-term longitudinal care to these patients. It is pertinent that nephrologists understand the various nuances of aspects such as immunosuppression, opportunistic infections, and identification of causes associated with graft dysfunction.

Disorders of potassium homeostasis after kidney transplantation

Disturbances of potassium balance are often encountered when managing kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Both hyperkalemia and hypokalemia may present either as medical emergencies or chronic outpatient abnormalities. Despite the high incidence of hyperkalemia and its potential life-threatening implications, consensus on its management in KTR is lacking. Hypokalemia in KTR is also well-described, although it is given less attention by clinicians compared to hyperkalemia. This article discusses the etiology, pathophysiology and management of both types of potassium disorders in KTR. Once any emergent situation has been corrected, treatment approaches include correcting insulin deficiency if present, adjusting non-immunosuppressive and immunosuppressive medications, eliminating or supplementing potassium as needed, and dietary counselling. Although commonly of multifactorial etiology, ascertaining the specific cause in a particular patient will help guide successful management. Monitoring KTR through regular laboratory testing is essential to detect serious disturbances in potassium balance since patients are often asymptomatic.

Immunosuppressive drug combinations after kidney transplantation and post-transplant diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation (KT). This systematic review investigated the effect of different immunosuppressive regimens on the risk of PTDM. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included KT recipients with any immunosuppression and reported PTDM outcomes up to 1 October 2023. The analysis included 125 RCTs. We found no differences in PTDM risk within induction therapies. In de novo KT, there was an increased risk of developing PTDM with tacrolimus versus cyclosporin (RR 1.71, 95%CI [1.38-2.11]). No differences were observed between tacrolimus+mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) and tacrolimus+MMF/MPA, but there was a tendency towards a higher risk of PTDM in the cyclosporin+mTORi group (RR 1.42, 95%CI [0.99-2.04]). Conversion from cyclosporin to an mTORi increased PTDM risk (RR 1.89, 95%CI [1.18-3.03]). De novo belatacept compared with a calcineurin inhibitor resulted in 50% lower risk of PTDM (RR 0.50, 95%CI [0.32-0.79]). Steroid avoidance resulted in 31% lower PTDM risk (RR 0.69, 95%CI [0.57-0.83]), whereas steroid withdrawal resulted in no differences. Immunosuppression should be decided on an individual basis, carefully weighing the risk of future PTDM and rejection.

Long-Term Outcomes after Conversion to a Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Conversion to a belatacept-based immunosuppression is currently used as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) avoidance strategy when the CNI-based standard-of-care immunosuppression is not tolerated after kidney transplantation. However, there is a lack of evidence on the long-term benefit and safety after conversion to belatacept.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 311 kidney transplant recipients from 2007 to 2020 from two referral centers, converted from CNI to belatacept after transplant according to a prespecified protocol. Patients were matched at the time of conversion to patients maintained with CNIs, using optimal matching. The primary end point was death-censored allograft survival at 7 years. The secondary end points were patient survival, eGFR, and safety outcomes, including serious viral infections, immune-related complications, antibody-mediated rejection, T-cell-mediated rejection, de novo anti-HLA donor-specific antibody, de novo diabetes, cardiovascular events, and oncologic complications.

RESULTS

A total of 243 patients converted to belatacept (belatacept group) were matched to 243 patients maintained on CNIs (CNI control group). All recipient, transplant, functional, histologic, and immunologic parameters were well balanced between the two groups with a standardized mean difference below 0.05. At 7 years post-conversion to belatacept, allograft survival was 78% compared with 63% in the CNI control group ( P < 0.001 for log-rank test). The safety outcomes showed a similar rate of patient death (28% in the belatacept group versus 36% in the CNI control group), active antibody-mediated rejection (6% versus 7%), T-cell-mediated rejection (4% versus 4%), major adverse cardiovascular events, and cancer occurrence (9% versus 11%). A significantly higher rate of de novo proteinuria was observed in the belatacept group as compared with the CNI control group (37% versus 21%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world evidence study shows that conversion to belatacept post-transplant was associated with lower risk of graft failure and acceptable safety outcomes compared with patients maintained on CNIs.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

Long-term Outcomes after Conversion to Belatacept, NCT04733131 .

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to belatacept-based immunosuppressive therapy skews terminal proliferation of non-classical monocytes and lowers lymphocyte counts

Belatacept, a modified form of CTLA-Ig that blocks CD28-mediated co-stimulation of T cells, is an immune-suppressant that can be used as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). In kidney transplant recipients, belatacept has been associated with improved renal function and reduced cardiovascular toxicity. Monocytes as well as T-lymphocytes play causal roles in the pathophysiology of atherosclerotic disease. We hypothesized that the beneficial impact of the use of belatacept over CNIs on cardiovascular risk could be partly explained by the impact of belatacept therapy on these circulating leukocytes. Hence, we phenotyped circulating leukocytes in transplanted patients with a stable renal function that were randomized between either continuation of CNI or conversion to belatacept in two international studies in which we participated. In 41 patients, we found that belatacept-treated patients consistently showed lower numbers of B-lymphocytes, T-lymphocytes as well as CD14-negative monocytes (CD14NM), especially in non-diabetic patients. Our observation that this decrease was associated to plasma concentrations of TNFα is consistent with a model where CD14NM-production of TNFα is diminished by belatacept-treatment, due to effects on the antigen-presenting cell compartment.

Costimulatory Blockade and Solid Organ Transplantation: The Past, Present, and Future

Belatacept is the first costimulatory blockade agent clinically approved for transplant immunosuppression. Although more than 10 years of study have demonstrated that belatacept offers superior long-term renal allograft and patient survival compared to conventional calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression regimens, the clinical adoption of belatacept has continued to lag because of concerns of an early risk of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and various logistical barriers to its administration. In this review, the history of the clinical development of belatacept is examined, along with the findings of the seminal BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials culminating in the clinical approval of belatacept. Recent efforts to incorporate belatacept into novel CNI-free immunosuppression regimens are reviewed, as well as the experience of the Emory Transplant Center in using a tapered course of low-dose tacrolimus in belatacept-treated renal allograft patients to garner the long-term outcome benefits of belatacept without the short-term increased risks of ACR. Potential avenues to increase the clinical adoption of belatacept in the future are explored, including surmounting the logistical barriers of belatacept administration through subcutaneous administration or more infrequent belatacept dosing. In addition, belatacept conversion strategies and potential expanded clinical indications of belatacept are discussed for pediatric transplant recipients, extrarenal transplant recipients, treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and in patients with failed renal allografts. Finally, we discuss the novel immunosuppressive drugs currently in the development pipeline that may aid in the expansion of costimulation blockade utilization.

Preventing Rejection of the Kidney Transplant

With increasing knowledge of immunologic factors and with the advent of potent immunosuppressive agents, the last several decades have seen significantly improved kidney allograft survival. However, despite overall improved short to medium-term allograft survival, long-term allograft outcomes remain unsatisfactory. A large body of literature implicates acute and chronic rejection as independent risk factors for graft loss. In this article, we review measures taken at various stages in the kidney transplant process to minimize the risk of rejection. In the pre-transplant phase, it is imperative to minimize the risk of sensitization, aim for better HLA matching including eplet matching and use desensitization in carefully selected high-risk patients. The peri-transplant phase involves strategies to minimize cold ischemia times, individualize induction immunosuppression and make all efforts for better HLA matching. In the post-transplant phase, the focus should move towards individualizing maintenance immunosuppression and using innovative strategies to increase compliance. Acute rejection episodes are risk factors for significant graft injury and development of chronic rejection thus one should strive for early detection and aggressive treatment. Monitoring for DSA development, especially in high-risk populations, should be made part of transplant follow-up protocols. A host of new biomarkers are now commercially available, and these should be used for early detection of rejection, immunosuppression modulation, prevention of unnecessary biopsies and monitoring response to rejection treatment. There is a strong push needed for the development of new drugs, especially for the management of chronic or resistant rejections, to prolong graft survival. Prevention of rejection is key for the longevity of kidney allografts. This requires a multipronged approach and significant effort on the part of the recipients and transplant centers.

Immunosuppression in HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF STUDY

The purpose of this review is to provide the current state of immunosuppression therapy in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with HIV and to discuss practical dilemmas to better understand and manage these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Certain studies find higher rates of rejection, which raises the need to critically assess the approach to immunosuppression management in HIV-positive KTR. Induction immunosuppression is guided by transplant center-level preference rather than by the individual patient characteristics. Earlier recommendations expressed concerns about the use of induction immunosuppression, especially utilizing lymphocyte-depleting agents; however, updated guidelines based on newer data recommend that induction can be used in HIV-positive KTR, and the choice of agent be made according to immunological risk. Likewise, most studies point out success with using first-line maintenance immunosuppression including tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids. In selected patients, belatacept appears to be a promising alternative to calcineurin inhibitors with some well established advantages. Early discontinuation of steroids in this population carries a high risk of rejection and should be avoided.

SUMMARY

Immunosuppression management in HIV-positive KTR is complex and challenging, mainly because of the difficulty of maintaining a proper balance between rejection and infection. Interpretation and understanding of the current data towards a personalized approach of immunosuppression could improve management in HIV-positive KTR.

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA for Kidney Allograft Surveillance after Conversion to Belatacept: Prospective Pilot Study

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is used as a biomarker for detection of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and other forms of graft injury. Another potential indication is guidance of immunosuppressive therapy when no therapeutic drug monitoring is available. In such situations, detection of patients with overt or subclinical graft injury is important to personalize immunosuppression. We prospectively measured dd-cfDNA in 22 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) over a period of 6 months after conversion to belatacept for clinical indication and assessed routine clinical parameters. Patient and graft survival was 100% after 6 months, and eGFR remained stable (28.7 vs. 31.1 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.60). Out of 22 patients, 2 (9%) developed biopsy-proven rejection-one episode of low-grade TCMR IA and one episode of caABMR. While both episodes were detected by increase in creatinine, the caABMR episode led to increase in absolute dd-cfDNA (168 copies/mL) above the cut-off of 50 copies/mL, while the TCMR episode did show slightly increased relative dd-cfDNA (0.85%) despite normal absolute dd-cfDNA (22 copies/mL). Dd-cfDNA did not differ before and after conversion in a subgroup of 12 KTR with previous calcineurin inhibitor therapy and no rejection (12.5 vs. 25.3 copies/mL, p = 0.34). In this subgroup, 3/12 (25%) patients showed increase of absolute dd-cfDNA above the prespecified cut-off (50 copies/mL) despite improving eGFR. Increase in dd-cfDNA after conversion to belatacept is common and could point towards subclinical allograft injury. To detect subclinical TCMR changes without vascular lesions, additional biomarkers or urinary dd-cfDNA should complement plasma dd-cfDNA. Resolving CNI toxicity is unlikely to be detected by decreased dd-cfDNA levels. In summary, the sole determination of dd-cfDNA has limited utility in the guidance of patients after late conversion to belatacept. Further studies should focus on patients undergoing early conversion and include protocol biopsies at least for patients with increased dd-cfDNA.

Belatacept rescue conversion in kidney transplant recipients with vascular lesions (Banff cv score >2): a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with decreased graft function and histological vascular changes can be particularly challenging. The impact of a late rescue conversion to belatacept on kidney graft survival in this context has never been studied.

METHODS

We report a bicentric retrospective cohort study comparing a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to belatacept switch versus CNI continuation in 139 kidney transplant recipients with histological kidney vascular damage (cv ≥2, g + cpt ≤1, i + t ≤1) and low estimated glomerular filtration rate (≤40 mL/min/1.73 m²). Primary outcome was death-censored graft survival.

RESULTS

During the study follow-up, 10 graft losses (14.5%) occurred in the belatacept group (n = 69) versus 26 (37.1%) in the matched CNI group (n = 70) (P = .005). Death-censored graft survival was significantly higher in the belatacept group (P = .001). At 3 years, graft survival was 84.0% in the belatacept group compared with 65.1% in the control group. Continuing CNI was an independent risk factor for graft loss [hazard ratio (HR) 3.46; P < .005]. The incidence of cellular rejection after the conversion was low (4.3% in both groups) and not significantly different between groups (P = .84). Patients switched to belatacept developed significantly less donor-specific antibodies de novo. Belatacept was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of opportunistic infections (HR 4.84; P < .005).

CONCLUSION

The replacement of CNI with belatacept in patients with decreased allograft function and vascular lesions is associated with an improvement in graft survival and represents a valuable option in a context of organ shortage. Caution should be exercised regarding the increased risk of opportunistic infection.

Conversion to Belatacept in kidney transplant recipients with chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR)

BACKGROUND

The costimulatory inhibitor Belatacept (Bela) has been shown to be an effective alternative in several clinical situations, including chronic antibody-mediated rejection, calcineurin toxicity, and de novo alloantibody formation. To further explore the usefulness of Belatacept under various clinical scenarios, we performed a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all recipients who had a BPAR diagnosis of CAMR and were converted to a Belatacept maintenance immunosuppression regimen after kidney transplantation.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of all kidney transplants adult patients at SUNY Upstate Medical Hospital from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2021. Our inclusion criteria were the patients who have been diagnosed with CAMR according to their renal biopsy based on the 2013 Banff criteria. The primary objective was to compare the kidney viability and function using GFR between the two interest groups and finally compare the outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients met our inclusion criteria based on the kidney biopsy result, which showed chronic antibody-mediated graft rejection (CAMR). Nineteen patients (39.6%) were converted to the Belatacept, and we continued the previous immunosuppression regimen in 29 patients (60.4%). The mean time from the transplant date to the diagnosis of CAMR was 1385 days in the Belatacept group and 914 days for the non-Belatacept group (P = 0.15). The mean GFR comparison at each time point between the groups did not show a significant difference, and Belatacept did not show superiority compared to the standard immunosuppression regimen in terms of kidney function preservation. 1 (5.2%) patient from the Belatacept group and 1 (3.4%) patient from the non-Belatacept group had a biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) after CAMR confirmation, and it was comparable (P = 0.76). De novo synthesis of the DSA rate was 12.5% in the Belatacept group and 15% In the non-Belatacept group, which was comparable. (P = 0.90). The patient survival rate was 100% in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that compared to the standard Tacrolimus/MMF/Prednisone regimen, Belatacept did not significantly benefit in preserving the GFR in long-term follow-ups and stabilizing the DSA production, which is one of the main factors resulting in chronic graft failure.

Harnessing the B Cell Response in Kidney Transplantation - Current State and Future Directions

Despite dramatic improvement in kidney transplantation outcomes over the last decades due to advent of modern immunosuppressive agents, long-term outcomes remain poor. Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), a B cell driven process, accounts for the majority of chronic graft failures. There are currently no FDA-approved regimens for ABMR; however, several clinical trials are currently on-going. In this review, we present current mechanisms of B cell response in kidney transplantation, the clinical impact of sensitization and ABMR, the B cell response under current immunosuppressive regimens, and ongoing clinical trials for ABMR and desensitization treatment.

CD86 occupancy in belatacept-treated kidney transplant patients is not associated with clinical and infectious outcomes

The CD86 occupancy assay has been developed to measure the number of CD86 molecules unbound to belatacept, but its association with clinical outcomes has not been assessed yet. All kidney transplant patients switched to belatacept in our center between 2016 and 2018 were included. Blood samples were collected before each infusion for 1 year to assess CD86 occupancy by CD86 antibody cytometry staining on the surface of CD14⁺ monocytes. Results were expressed as the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) value of CD86 staining. At each infusion, the MFI_{Day of infusion} /MFI_{Day 0} ratio was calculated. Forty-one patients were consecutively included. After every 2-week infusion period, CD86 MFI ratio dropped from 1.00 to 0.73 [0.57-0.98], p = .07. However, this ratio progressively increased to 0.78 [0.53-1.13] at 1 year, which was not statistically different from pre-switch ratio, p = .4. Over the first year, the MFI ratio coefficient of variation was 31.58% [23.75-38.31]. MFI ratio was not different between patients with or without opportunistic infections: 0.73 [0.60-0.88] versus 0.80 [0.71-1.00], p = .2, or between patients with or without EBV DNAemia, p = .2. Despite previous in vitro results, the CD86 occupancy assay suffers from a high intra-individual variability and does not appear to be relevant to clinical outcomes.

Belatacept as a Treatment Option in Patients with Severe BK Polyomavirus Infection and High Immunological Risk—Walking a Tightrope between Viral Control and Prevention of Rejection

Balancing the immune system with immunosuppressive treatment is essential in kidney transplant recipients to avoid allograft rejection on the one hand and infectious complications on the other. BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a viral complication that seriously threatens kidney allograft survival. Therefore, the main treatment strategy is to reduce immunosuppression, but this is associated with an increased rejection risk. Belatacept is an immunosuppressant that acts by blocking the CD80/86-CD28 co-stimulatory pathway of effector T-cells with marked effects on the humoral response. However, when compared with calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI), the cellular rejection rate is higher. With this in mind, we hypothesized that belatacept could be used as rescue therapy in severely BKPyV-affected patients with high immunological risk. We present three cases of patients with BKPyVAN-associated complications and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and one patient who developed T-cell-mediated rejection after a reduction in immunosuppression in response to BKPyVAN. Patients were switched to a belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen and showed significantly improved viral control and stabilized graft function. The cases presented here suggest that belatacept is a potential treatment option in the complicated situation of refractory BKPyV infection in patients with high immunological risk.

Three-Year Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients Switched From Calcineurin Inhibitor-Based Regimens to Belatacept as a Rescue Therapy

Background: The long-term benefits of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to belatacept in kidney transplant recipients (KTr) are poorly documented.

Methods: A single-center retrospective work to study first-time CNI to belatacept conversion as a rescue therapy [eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m², chronic histological lesions, or CNI-induced thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)]. Patient and kidney allograft survivals, eGFR, severe adverse events, donor-specific antibodies (DSA), and histological data were recorded over 36 months after conversion.

Results: We included N = 115 KTr. The leading cause for switching was chronic histological lesions with non-optimal eGFR (56.5%). Three years after conversion, patient, and death-censored kidney allograft survivals were 88% and 92%, respectively, eGFR increased significantly from 31.5 ± 17.5 to 36.7 ± 15.7 ml/min/1.73 m² (p < 0.01), the rejection rate was 10.4%, OI incidence was 5.2 (2.9–7.6) per 100 person-years. Older age was associated with death, eGFR was not associated with death nor allograft loss. No patient developed dnDSA at M36 after conversion. CNI-induced TMA disappeared in all cases without eculizumab use. Microvascular inflammation and chronic lesions remained stable.

Conclusion: Post-KT conversion from CNIs to belatacept, as rescue therapy, is safe and beneficial irrespective of the switch timing and could represent a good compromise facing organ shortage. Age and eGFR at conversion should be considered in the decision whether to switch.

Mechanisms and management of drug-induced hyperkalemia in kidney transplant patients

Hyperkalemia is a common and potentially life-threatening complication following kidney transplantation that can be caused by a composite of factors such as medications, delayed graft function, and possibly potassium intake. Managing hyperkalemia after kidney transplantation is associated with increased morbidity and healthcare costs, and can be a cause of multiple hospital admissions and barriers to patient discharge. Medications used routinely after kidney transplantation are considered the most frequent culprit for post-transplant hyperkalemia in recipients with a well-functioning graft. These include calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) prophylactic agents, and antihypertensives (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta blockers). CNIs can cause hyperkalemic renal tubular acidosis. When hyperkalemia develops following transplantation, the potential offending medication may be discontinued, switched to another agent, or dose-reduced. Belatacept and mTOR inhibitors offer an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors in the event of hyperkalemia, however should be prescribed in the appropriate patient. While trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) remains the gold standard for prevention of PCP, alternative agents (e.g. dapsone, atovaquone) have been studied and can be recommend in place of TMP/SMX. Antihypertensives that act on the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System are generally avoided early after transplant but may be indicated later in the transplant course for patients with comorbidities. In cases of mild to moderate hyperkalemia, medical management can be used to normalize serum potassium levels and allow the transplant team additional time to evaluate the function of the graft. In the immediate post-operative setting following kidney transplantation, a rapidly rising potassium refractory to medical therapy can be an indication for dialysis. Patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS-9) may play an important role in the management of chronic hyperkalemia in kidney transplant patients, although additional long-term studies are necessary to confirm these effects.

Conversion from Calcineurin Inhibitor- to Belatacept-Based Maintenance Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Phase 3b Trial

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are standard of care after kidney transplantation, but they are associated with nephrotoxicity and reduced long-term graft survival. Belatacept, a selective T cell costimulation blocker, is approved for the prophylaxis of kidney transplant rejection. This phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of conversion from CNI-based to belatacept-based maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Stable adult kidney transplant recipients 6-60 months post-transplantation under CNI-based immunosuppression were randomized (1:1) to switch to belatacept or continue treatment with their established CNI. The primary end point was the percentage of patients surviving with a functioning graft at 24 months.

RESULTS

Overall, 446 renal transplant recipients were randomized to belatacept conversion ( n =223) or CNI continuation ( n =223). The 24-month rates of survival with graft function were 98% and 97% in the belatacept and CNI groups, respectively (adjusted difference, 0.8; 95.1% CI, -2.1 to 3.7). In the belatacept conversion versus CNI continuation groups, 8% versus 4% of patients experienced biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), respectively, and 1% versus 7% developed de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs), respectively. The 24-month eGFR was higher with belatacept (55.5 versus 48.5 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 with CNI). Both groups had similar rates of serious adverse events, infections, and discontinuations, with no unexpected adverse events. One patient in the belatacept group had post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching stable renal transplant recipients from CNI-based to belatacept-based immunosuppression was associated with a similar rate of death or graft loss, improved renal function, and a numerically higher BPAR rate but a lower incidence of dnDSA.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: A Study in Maintenance Kidney Transplant Recipients Following Conversion to Nulojix® (Belatacept)-Based, NCT01820572.

Belatacept Use after Kidney Transplantation and Its Effects on Risk of Infection and COVID-19 Vaccine Response

Introduction: Belatacept is a common immunosuppressive therapy used after kidney transplantation (KT) to avoid calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) use and its related toxicities. It is unclear whether its use exposes KT recipients (KTx) to a greater risk of infection or a poorer response to vaccines. Areas covered: We reviewed PubMed and the Cochrane database. We then summarized the mechanisms and impacts of belatacept use on the risk of infection, particularly opportunistic, in two settings, i.e., de novo KTx and conversion from CNIs. We also focused on COVID-19 infection risk and response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients whose maintenance immunosuppression relies on belatacept. Expert opinion: When belatacept is used de novo, or after drug conversion the safety profile regarding the risk of infection remains good. However, there is an increased risk of opportunistic infections, mainly CMV disease and Pneumocystis pneumonia, particularly in those with a low eGFR, in older people, in those receiving steroid-based therapy, or those that have an early conversion from CNI to belatacept (i.e., <six months post-transplantation). Thus, we recommend, if possible, delaying conversion from CNI to belatacept until at least six months post-transplantation. Optimal timing seems to be eight months post-transplantation. In addition, KTx receiving belatacept respond poorly to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Kidney Disease After Nonkidney Solid Organ Transplant

Nonkidney solid organ transplants (NKSOTs) are increasing in the United States with improving long-term allograft and patient survival. CKD is prevalent in patients with NKSOT and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality especially in those who progress to end-stage kidney disease. Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity is a main contributor to CKD after NKSOT, but other factors in the pretransplant, peritransplant, and post-transplant period can predispose to progressive kidney dysfunction. The management of CKD after NKSOT generally follows society guidelines for native kidney disease. Kidney-protective and calcineurin inhibitor-sparing immunosuppression has been explored in this population and warrants a discussion with transplant teams. Kidney transplantation in NKSOT recipients remains the kidney replacement therapy of choice for suitable candidates, as it provides a survival benefit over remaining on dialysis.

Belatacept Conversion in Kidney After Liver Transplantation

Background.

Costimulatory blockade with belatacept has demonstrated long-term benefits in renal transplantation, but de novo use in liver transplant recipients has resulted in increased rejection, graft loss, and death. However, belatacept conversion as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) avoidance strategy has not been studied and may be of benefit in liver transplantation where CNI-induced renal dysfunction and toxicity are barriers to improved outcomes.

Methods.

Using clinical data extracted from our institutional medical record, we report on 8 patients who underwent kidney after liver transplantation and were treated with belatacept-based immunosuppression and transient CNI therapy.

Results.

All patients tolerated belatacept therapy without any patient deaths or graft losses. No episodes of rejection, de novo donor-specific antibody formation, or major systemic infections were observed, and all patients demonstrated preserved liver and excellent renal allograft function. Patients received belatacept for a median duration of 13.2 mo, and at a median follow-up of 15.9 mo post–kidney transplant, 6 of 8 patients continued on belatacept with 3 completely off and 3 poised to transition off CNI.

Conclusions.

These findings are the first evidence that in liver transplant recipients requiring subsequent kidney transplantation, belatacept-based therapy can potentially facilitate CNI-free maintenance immunosuppression. This supports the possibility of belatacept conversion in stand-alone liver transplant recipients as a viable method of CNI avoidance.

Therapeutic targeting of inflammation in hypertension: from novel mechanisms to translational perspective

Both animal models and human observational and genetic studies have shown that immune and inflammatory mechanisms play a key role in hypertension and its complications. We review the effects of immunomodulatory interventions on blood pressure, target organ damage, and cardiovascular risk in humans. In experimental and small clinical studies, both non-specific immunomodulatory approaches, such as mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate, and medications targeting T and B lymphocytes, such as tacrolimus, cyclosporine, everolimus, and rituximab, lower blood pressure and reduce organ damage. Mechanistically targeted immune interventions include isolevuglandin scavengers to prevent neo-antigen formation, co-stimulation blockade (abatacept, belatacept), and anti-cytokine therapies (e.g. secukinumab, tocilizumab, canakinumab, TNF-α inhibitors). In many studies, trial designs have been complicated by a lack of blood pressure-related endpoints, inclusion of largely normotensive study populations, polypharmacy, and established comorbidities. Among a wide range of interventions reviewed, TNF-α inhibitors have provided the most robust evidence of blood pressure lowering. Treatment of periodontitis also appears to deliver non-pharmacological anti-hypertensive effects. Evidence of immunomodulatory drugs influencing hypertension-mediated organ damage are also discussed. The reviewed animal models, observational studies, and trial data in humans, support the therapeutic potential of immune-targeted therapies in blood pressure lowering and in hypertension-mediated organ damage. Targeted studies are now needed to address their effects on blood pressure in hypertensive individuals.

Every 2-month belatacept maintenance therapy in kidney transplant recipients greater than 1-year posttransplant: A randomized, noninferiority trial

Belatacept results in improved kidney transplant outcomes, but utilization has been limited by logistical barriers related to monthly (q1m) intravenous infusions. Every 2-month (q2m) belatacept has potential to increase utilization, therefore we conducted a randomized noninferiority trial in low immunologic risk renal transplant recipients greater than 1-year posttransplant. Patients on belatacept were randomly assigned to q1m or q2m therapy. The primary objective was a noninferiority comparison of renal function (eGFR) at 12 months with a noninferiority margin (NIM) of 6.0 ml/min/1.73 m² . One hundred and sixty-six participants were randomized to q1m (n = 82) or q2m (n = 84) belatacept, 163 patients received treatment, and 76 q1m and 77 q2m subjects completed the 12-month study period. Every 2-month belatacept was noninferior to q1m, as the difference in mean eGFR adjusted for baseline renal function did not exceed the NIM. Two-month dosing was safe and well tolerated, with no patient deaths or graft losses. Four rejection episodes and three cases of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) occurred among q2m subjects; however, only one rejection and one instance of DSA were observed in subjects adherent to the study protocol. Every 2-month belatacept therapy may facilitate long-term utilization of costimulation blockade, but future multicenter studies with long-term follow-up will further elucidate immunologic risk. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02560558).

Optimal Immunosuppression Strategy in the Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipient

Patients with previous sensitization events against anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) often have circulating anti-HLA antibodies. Following organ transplantation, sensitized patients have higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) compared to those who are non-sensitized. More stringent donor matching is required for these patients, which results in a reduced donor pool and increased time on the waitlist. Current approaches for sensitized patients focus on reducing preformed antibodies that preclude transplantation; however, this type of desensitization does not modulate the primed immune response in sensitized patients. Thus, an optimized maintenance immunosuppressive regimen is necessary for highly sensitized patients, which may be distinct from non-sensitized patients. In this review, we will discuss the currently available therapeutic options for induction, maintenance, and adjuvant immunosuppression for sensitized patients.

Long-Term Immunosuppression Management: Opportunities and Uncertainties

The long-term management of maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients remains complex. The vast majority of patients are treated with the calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus as the primary agent in combination with mycophenolate, with or without corticosteroids. A tacrolimus trough target 5-8 ng/ml seems to be optimal for rejection prophylaxis, but long-term tacrolimus-related side effects and nephrotoxicity support the ongoing evaluation of noncalcineurin inhibitor-based regimens. Current alternatives include belatacept or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. For the former, superior kidney function at 7 years post-transplant compared with cyclosporin generated initial enthusiasm, but utilization has been hampered by high initial rejection rates. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have yielded mixed results as well, with improved kidney function tempered by higher risk of rejection, proteinuria, and adverse effects leading to higher discontinuation rates. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors may play a role in the secondary prevention of squamous cell skin cancer as conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to an mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor resulted in a reduction of new lesion development. Early withdrawal of corticosteroids remains an attractive strategy but also is associated with a higher risk of rejection despite no difference in 5-year patient or graft survival. A major barrier to long-term graft survival is chronic alloimmunity, and regardless of agent used, managing the toxicities of immunosuppression against the risk of chronic antibody-mediated rejection remains a fragile balance.

Impact of Belatacept Conversion on Renal Function, Histology, and Gene Expression in Kidney Transplant Patients With Chronic Active Antibody-mediated Rejection

BACKGROUND

Here, we present our initial experience with a prospective protocol of belatacept conversion in patients with chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (caAMR) and a high degree of chronicity at the time of diagnosis.

METHODS

We converted 19 patients (mean age, 45 ± 12 y) with biopsy-proven caAMR from tacrolimus to belatacept at a median of 44 months post-kidney transplant.

RESULTS

At a median of 29 months (interquartile range, 16-46 mo) postconversion, death-censored graft and patient survivals were 89% and 95%, respectively. When compared to a 1:2 propensity-matched control cohort from the INSERM U970 registry maintained on calcineurin inhibitor, the belatacept group had progressive improvement (P = 0.02) in estimated glomerular filtration rate from a mean of 33.9 ± 10 at baseline to 37.8 ± 13 at 6 months and 38.5 ± 12 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 12 months postconversion, as compared to a steady decline noted in the controls (36.2 [baseline] → 33.1 [6 mo] → 32.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 [12 mo] of follow-up). A paired histologic comparison of preconversion and postconversion (performed at median 9.5 mo postconversion) biopsies showed no worsening in microvascular inflammation or chronicity. The paired tissue gene expression analysis showed improved mean total rejection score (0.68 ± 0.26-0.56 ± 0.33; P = 0.02) and a trend toward improved antibody-mediated rejection score (0.64 ± 0.34-0.56 ± 0.39; P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we report that in patients diagnosed with caAMR who were not subjected to intensive salvage immunosuppressive therapies, isolated belatacept conversion alone was associated with stabilization in renal function. These results are bolstered by molecular evidence of improved inflammation.

ACTH treatment promotes murine cardiac allograft acceptance

Heart transplantation is the optimal therapy for patients with end-stage heart disease, but its long-term outcome remains inadequate. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of the melanocortin receptors (MCRs) in inflammation, but how MCRs regulate the balance between alloreactive T cells and Tregs, and whether they impact chronic heart transplant rejection, is unknown. Here, we found that Tregs express MC2R, and MC2R expression was highest among all MCRs by Tregs. Our data indicate that adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), the sole ligand for MC2R, promoted the formation of Tregs by increasing the expression of IL-2Rα (CD25) in CD4⁺ T cells and activation of STAT5 in CD4⁺CD25⁺ T cells. ACTH treatment also improved the survival of heart allografts and increased the formation of Tregs in CD28KO mice. ACTH treatment synergized with the tolerogenic effect of CTLA-4–Ig, resulting in long-term survival of heart allografts and an increase in intragraft Tregs. ACTH administration also demonstrated higher prolongation of heart allograft survival in transgenic mouse recipients with both complete KO and conditional KO of PI3Kγ in T cells. Finally, ACTH treatment reduced chronic rejection markedly. These data demonstrate that ACTH treatment improved heart transplant outcomes, and this effect correlated with an increase in Tregs.

A noninferiority design for a delayed calcineurin inhibitor substitution trial in kidney transplantation

Improving long-term kidney transplant outcomes requires novel treatment strategies, including delayed calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) substitution, tested using informative trial designs. An alternative approach to the usual superiority-based trial is a noninferiority trial design that tests whether an investigational agent is not unacceptably worse than standard of care. An informative noninferiority design, with biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) as the endpoint, requires determination of a prespecified, evidence-based noninferiority margin for BPAR. No such information is available for delayed CNI substitution in kidney transplantation. Herein we analyzed data from recent kidney transplant trials of CNI withdrawal and "real world" CNI- based standard of care, containing subjects with well-documented evidence of immune quiescence at 6 months posttransplant-ideal candidates for delayed CNI substitution. Our analysis indicates an evidence-based noninferiority margin of 13.8% for the United States Food and Drug Administration's composite definition of BPAR between 6 and 24 months posttransplant. Sample size estimation determined that ~225 randomized subjects would be required to evaluate noninferiority for this primary clinical efficacy endpoint, and superiority for a renal function safety endpoint. Our findings provide the basis for future delayed CNI substitution noninferiority trials, thereby increasing the likelihood they will provide clinically implementable results and achieve regulatory approval.

Belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen in HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients

Background

Kidney allograft survival in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients is lower than that in the general population. Belatacept increases long-term patient and allograft survival rates when compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Its use in HIV-positive recipients remains poorly documented.

Methods

We retrospectively report a French cohort of HIV-positive kidney allograft recipients who were switched from CNI to belatacept, between June 2012 and December 2018. Patient and allograft survival rates, HIV immunovirological and clinical outcomes, acute rejection, opportunistic infections (OIs) and HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were analysed at 3 and 12 months, and at the end of follow-up (last clinical visit attended after transplantation). Results were compared with HIV-positive recipients group treated with CNI.

Results

Twelve patients were switched to belatacept 10 (2–25) months after transplantation. One year after belatacept therapy, patient and allograft survival rates scored 92% for both, two (17%) HIV virological rebounds occurred due to antiretroviral therapy non-compliance, and CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell counts remained stable over time. Serious adverse events included two (17%) acute steroid-resistant T-cell-mediated rejections and three (25%) OIs. Kidney allograft function significantly increased over the 12 post-switch months (P = 0.009), and DSAs remained stable at 12 months after treatment. The control group showed similar results in terms of patient and kidney allograft survival rates, DSA characteristics and proteinuria

Conclusions

Switch from CNI to belatacept can be considered safe and may increase long-term kidney allograft survival in HIV-positive kidney allograft recipients. These results need to be confirmed in a larger cohort.

Conversion From Belatacept to Another Immunosuppressive Regimen in Maintenance Kidney-Transplantation Patients

Introduction

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic, several physicians have questioned pursuing belatacept in kidney-transplant patients in order to reduce the risk of nosocomial transmission during the monthly infusion. The effect of the conversion from belatacept to another immunosuppressive regimen is underreported. The aim of the present retrospective study was to assess the effect on kidney function and the clinical outcome of the conversion from belatacept to another regimen.

Methods

We have identified 44 maintenance kidney transplantation patients from five French kidney transplantation centers who were converted from belatacept to another regimen either because of a complication (n = 28) or another reason (patients’ request or belatacept shortage, n = 13). The follow-up after the conversion from belatacept was 27.5 ± 25.3 months.

Results

Overall, mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decreased from 44.2 ± 16 ml/min per 1.73 m² at conversion from belatacept to 35.7 ± 18.4 ml/min per 1.73 m² at last follow-up (P = 0.0002). eGFR significantly decreased in patients who had been given belatacept at transplantation as well as in those who had been converted to belatacept earlier. The decrease was less significant in patients who had stopped belatacept without having experienced any complications. Finally, eGFR decreased more severely in patients who were converted to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), compared to those who received mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi). Few patients also developed diabetes and hypertension.

Conclusions

Thus, transplantation physicians should avoid stopping belatacept when not clinically required.

Opportunistic Infections and Efficacy Following Conversion to Belatacept-Based Therapy after Kidney Transplantation: A French Multicenter Cohort

Conversion from calcineurin-inhibitors (CNIs) to belatacept can help kidney-transplant (KT) recipients avoid CNI-related nephrotoxicity. The risk of associated opportunistic infections (OPIs) is ill-defined. We conducted a multicentric cohort study across 15 French KT-centers in a real-life setting. Between 07-2010 and 07-2019, 453 KT recipients were converted from CNI- to belatacept-based therapy at 19 [0.13-431] months post-transplantation. Most patients, i.e., 332 (79.3%), were converted after 6-months post-transplantation. Follow-up time after conversion was 20.1 +/- 13 months. OPIs developed in 42(9.3%) patients after 14 +/- 12 months post-conversion. Eight patients (19%) had two OPI episodes during follow-up. Incidences of CMV DNAemia and CMV disease were significantly higher in patients converted before 6-months post-KT compared to those converted later (i.e., 31.6% vs. 11.5%; p < 0.001; and 11.6% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001, respectively). Cumulative incidence of OPIs was 6.5 OPIs/100 person-years. Incidence of CMV disease was 2.8/100 person-years, of pneumocystis pneumonia 1.6/100 person-years, and of aspergillosis 0.2/100 person-years. Multivariate analyses showed that estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) < 25 mL/min/1.73 m² at conversion was independently associated with OPIs (HR = 4.7 (2.2 - 10.3), p < 0.001). The incidence of EBV DNAemia was 17.3 events /100 person-years. At 1-year post-conversion, mean eGFR had significantly increased from 32.0 +/- 18 mL/min/1.73 m² to 42.2 +/- 18 mL/min/1.73 m² (p < 0.0001). Conversion to belatacept is an effective strategy with a low infectious risk.

Opportunistic infections after conversion to belatacept in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Belatacept (bela) rescue therapy seems to be a valuable option for calcineurin inhibitor chronic toxicity in kidney transplantation. Nevertheless, the risk of infection associated with bela is not well reported.

METHODS

We report the rate of opportunistic infections (OPI) after a switch to bela in a multicentric cohort of 280 kidney transplant patients.

RESULTS

Forty-two OPI occurred in 34 patients (12.1%), on average 10.8 ± 11.3 months after the switch. With a cumulative exposure of 5128 months of bela treatment, we found an incidence of 0.008 OPI/month of exposure, and 9.8 OPI/100 person-years. The most common OPI was cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in 18/42 OPI (42.9%) and pneumocystis pneumonia in 12/42 OPI (28.6%). Two patients presented a progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy and two patients developed a cerebral Epstein-Barr virus-induced post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. OPI led to death in 9/34 patients (26.5%) and graft failure in 4/34 patients (11.8%). In multivariate analysis, estimated glomerular filtration rate <25/mL/min/1.73 m2 on the day of the switch and the use of immunosuppressive agents before transplantation were associated with the occurrence of OPI. We found a higher rate of infection-related hospitalization (24.1 versus 12.3/100 person-years, P = 0.0007) and also a higher rate of OPI (13.2 versus 6.7/100 person-years, P = 0.005) in the early conversion group (within 6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of OPI is significant post-conversion to bela and may require additional monitoring and prophylactic therapy, particularly regarding pneumocystis pneumonia and CMV disease. These data need to be confirmed in a larger case-control study.

Impact of belatacept conversion on kidney transplant function, histology, and gene expression - a single-center study

Prior studies on belatacept conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) have been limited by an absence of postconversion surveillance biopsies that could underestimate subclinical rejection, or a case-controlled design. A total of 53 adult patients with allograft dysfunction underwent belatacept conversion (median: 6 months) post-transplant. At a median follow-up = 2.5 years, patient survival was 94% with a death-censored graft survival of 85%. Seven (13%) patients had acute rejection (including 3 subclinical) at median 6 months postconversion. Overall, eGFR improved (P = <0.001) from baseline = 31±15 to 40.2 ± 17.6 ml/min/1.73m² by 6 months postconversion, but then stayed stable. This improvement was also observed (P < 0.001) in comparison with a propensity matched control cohort on CNI, where eGFR stayed stable (mean ~ 32ml/min/1.72m² ) over 2-year follow-up. Patients converted < 6 months post-transplant were more likely to have a long-term improvement in kidney function. Paired gene expression analysis of 30 (of 53) consecutive pre- and postconversion surveillance biopsies did not reveal changes in inflammation/acute injury; although atrophy-fibrosis score worsened (mean = 0.28 to 0.44; P = 0.005). Thus, improvement in renal function with belatacept conversion occurred early and then sustained in comparison with controls where renal function remained unchanged overtime. We were unable to show molecular signals that could be related to CNI administration and regressed after withdrawal.

Microvascular inflammation is a risk factor in kidney transplant recipients with very late conversion from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to belatacept

Background

In de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTR) treatment with belatacept has been established as a comparable option as maintenance immunosuppression, preferably as a strategy to convert from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)- to belatacept-based immunosuppression. Switch to belatacept demonstrated improved renal function in patients with CNI-induced nephrotoxicity, but risk of transplant rejection and the development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are still a matter of debate. Only few data are available in patients at increased immunological risk and late after transplantation.

Methods

We analyzed 30 long-term KTR (including 2 combined pancreas-KTR) converted from CNI to belatacept > 60 months after transplantation with moderate to severe graft dysfunction (GFR ≤ 45 mL/min). Biopsies were classified according to the Banff 2015 criteria. Group differences were assessed in a univariate analysis using Mann Whitney U or Chi square test, respectively. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for treatment failure was performed using a binary logistic regression model including significant predictors from univariate analysis. Fifty-six KTR matched for donor and recipient characteristics were used as a control cohort remaining under CNI-treatment.

Results

Patient survival in belatacept cohort at 12/24 months was 96.7%/90%, overall graft survival was 76.7 and 60.0%, while graft survival censored for death was 79.3%/66.7%. In patients with functioning grafts, median GFR improved from 22.5 mL/min to 24.5 mL/min at 24 months. Positivity for DSA at conversion was 46.7%. From univariate analysis of risk factors for graft loss, GFR < 25 mL/min (p = 0.042) and Banff microvascular inflammation (MVI) sum score ≥ 2 (p = 0.023) at conversion were significant at 24 months. In the analysis of risk factors for treatment failure, a MVI sum score ≥ 2 was significant univariately (p = 0.023) and in a bivariate (p = 0.037) logistic regression at 12 months. DSA-positivity was neither associated with graft loss nor treatment failure. The control cohort had comparable graft survival outcomes at 24 months, albeit without increase of mean GFR in patients with functioning grafts (ΔGFR of − 3.6 ± 8.5 mL/min).

Conclusion

Rescue therapy with conversion to belatacept is feasible in patients with worsening renal function, even many years after transplantation. The benefit in patients with MVI and severe GFR impairment remains to be investigated.

Conversion to belatacept maintenance immunosuppression in HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients

There are only scattered case reports documenting belatacept use in HIV + kidney transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective review to describe short-term outcomes following conversion to belatacept in a cohort of HIV + patients. Patients were included if they were converted to belatacept between May 2015 and May 2019, had an HIV- donor, and received ≥4 doses of belatacept. All patients were treated with non-depleting induction and triple maintenance immunosuppression. Allograft and HIV-related outcomes were collected from the date of belatacept infusion until May 2020. Ten HIV + kidney transplant recipients were identified, who were converted to belatacept a median of 364 days post-transplant. At last follow-up (median 3.3 years), 8 patients remained on belatacept therapy, and all patients were alive with functioning allografts. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) improved from 31.6 mL/min at baseline to 42.8 mL/min at 1 year (P = .03). Two patients developed acute rejection, with one necessitating conversion back to tacrolimus. All patients maintained undetectable HIV-1 viral loads at last follow-up. One patient each developed pneumocystis pneumonia and Kaposi sarcoma following conversion, which were responsive to standard medical therapy. In our cohort of stable HIV + kidney transplant recipients, conversion to belatacept was associated with excellent early patient and allograft survival and improved eGFR at 1 year.

Costimulation Blockade in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Costimulation between T cells and antigen-presenting cells is essential for the regulation of an effective alloimmune response and is not targeted with the conventional immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. Costimulation blockade therapy with biologicals allows precise targeting of the immune response but without non-immune adverse events. Multiple costimulation blockade approaches have been developed that inhibit the alloimmune response in kidney transplant recipients with varying degrees of success. Belatacept, an immunosuppressive drug that selectively targets the CD28-CD80/CD86 pathway, is the only costimulation blockade therapy that is currently approved for kidney transplant recipients. In the last decade, belatacept therapy has been shown to be a promising therapy in subgroups of kidney transplant recipients; however, the widespread use of belatacept has been tempered by an increased risk of acute kidney transplant rejection. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the costimulation blockade therapies that are currently in use or being developed for kidney transplant indications.