Association of Dialysis Duration with Outcomes after Transplantation in a Japanese Cohort

Persistent hyperparathyroidism after preemptive kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Long-term dialysis vintage is a predictor of persistent hyperparathyroidism (HPT) after kidney transplantation (KTx). Recently, preemptive kidney transplantation (PKT) has increased. However, the incidence, predictors, and clinical implications of HPT after PKT are unclear. Here, we aimed to elucidate these considerations.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled patients who underwent PKT between 2000 and 2016. Those who lost their graft within 1 year posttransplant were excluded. HPT was defined as an intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) level exceeding 80 pg/mL or hypercalcemia unexplained by causes other than HPT. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of HPT 1 year after PKT. The primary outcome was the predictors of HPT after PKT, and the secondary outcome was graft survival.

RESULTS

Among the 340 consecutive patients who underwent PKT, 188 did not have HPT (HPT-free group) and 152 had HPT (HPT group). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that pretransplant PTH level (P < 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 5.480; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.070-14.50) and preoperative donor-estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.033; OR, 0.978; 95% CI, 0.957-0.998) were independent predictors of HPT after PKT. Death-censored graft survival was significantly lower in the HPT group than that in the HPT-free group (90.4% vs. 96.4% at 10 years, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant PTH levels and donor kidney function were independent predictors of HPT after PKT. In addition, HPT was associated with worse graft outcomes even after PKT.

IN.PACT AV access randomized trial: Japan cohort outcomes through 12 months

PURPOSE

There is a lack of adjudicated and prospectively randomized published outcomes on the use of drug-coated balloons (DCB) to treat dysfunctional arteriovenous fistula in Asian patients. This post hoc subgroup analysis of 112 Japanese participants from the global IN.PACT AV Access trial reports outcomes through 12 months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants were treated with DCB (n = 58) or standard non-coated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloons (n = 54). Outcomes included target lesion primary patency (TLPP), access circuit primary patency, and safety.

RESULTS

Through 6 months, TLPP was 86.0% (49/57) in the DCB group and 49.1% (26/53) in the PTA group (p < 0.001). Through 12 months, TLPP was 67.3% (37/55) in the DCB group and 43.4% (23/53) in the PTA group (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

In this post hoc analysis of Japanese participants from the IN.PACT AV Access trial, participants treated with DCB had higher TLPP through 6 and 12 months compared with PTA.

Pretransplant Dialysis and Preemptive Transplant in Living Donor Kidney Recipients

Background

The optimal timing of dialysis access placement in individuals with stage 5 CKD is challenging to estimate. Preemptive living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) is the gold-standard treatment for ESKD due to superior graft survival and mortality, but dialysis initiation is often required. Among LDKT recipients, we sought to determine which clinical characteristics were associated with preemptive transplant. Among non-preemptive LDKT recipients, we sought to determine what dialysis access was used, and their duration of use before receipt of living donor transplant.

Methods

We retrospectively extracted data on 569 LDKT recipients, >18 years old, who were transplanted between January 2014 and July 2019 at UCSF, including dialysis access type (arteriovenous fistula [AVF], arteriovenous graft [AVG], peritoneal dialysis catheter [PD], and venous catheter), duration of dialysis, and clinical characteristics.

Results

Preemptive LDKT recipients constituted 30% of our cohort and were older, more likely to be White, more likely to have ESKD from polycystic kidney disease, and less likely to have ESKD from type 2 diabetes. Of the non-preemptive patients, 26% used AVF, 0.5% used AVG, 32% used peritoneal catheter, 11% used venous catheter, and 31% used more than one access type. Median (IQR) time on dialysis for AVF/AVG use was 1.86 (0.85-3.32) years; for PD catheters, 1.12 (0.55-1.92) years; for venous catheters, 0.66 (0.23-1.69) years; and for multimodal access, 2.15 (1.37-3.72) years.

Conclusions

We characterized the dialysis access landscape in LDKT recipients. Venous catheter and PD were the most popular modality in the first quartile of dialysis, and patients using these modalities had shorter times on dialysis compared with those with an AVF. Venous catheter or PD can be considered a viable bridge therapy in patients with living donor availability given their shorter waitlist times. Earlier referral of patients with living donor prospects might further minimize dialysis need.

Pearls and Pitfalls in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation After 5 Decades

Worldwide, over 1,300 pediatric kidney transplantations are performed every year. Since the first transplantation in 1959, healthcare has evolved dramatically. Pre-emptive transplantations with grafts from living donors have become more common. Despite a subsequent improvement in graft survival, there are still challenges to face. This study attempts to summarize how our understanding of pediatric kidney transplantation has developed and improved since its beginnings, whilst also highlighting those areas where future research should concentrate in order to help resolve as yet unanswered questions. Existing literature was compared to our own data of 411 single-center pediatric kidney transplantations between 1968 and 2020, in order to find discrepancies and allow identification of future challenges. Important issues for future care are innovations in immunosuppressive medication, improving medication adherence, careful donor selection with regard to characteristics of both donor and recipient, improvement of surgical techniques and increased attention for lower urinary tract dysfunction and voiding behavior in all patients.

Relevance of the perioperative edema index measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis for prediction of cardiovascular disease in living-donor kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Perioperative management of fluid status during kidney transplantation is important, because volume overload can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in recipients. The edema index calculated by bioelectrical impedance analysis is commonly used to correctly evaluate fluid status. We evaluated the relevance of the edema index for cardiovascular disease in kidney transplant recipients, and searched for predictors of high edema index in the perioperative period during kidney transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 88 recipients were included in this study. The group in which the edema index at discharge was >0.40 was termed as the "high edema index group", and that with ≤0.40 was termed as the "low edema index group". We assessed cardiovascular disease-free survival and cardiovascular disease-specific survival in the two groups by using Cox proportional regression analyses adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis. The patients' background and conventional cardiovascular disease risk factors were assessed to estimate predictors for a high edema index.

RESULTS

A high edema index was significantly associated with short cardiovascular disease-free survival after kidney transplantation (hazard ratio 10.01; P < 0.05) in the inverse probability of treatment weighting model. There were no significant differences in the cardiovascular disease-specific survival. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, non-pre-emptive kidney transplantation and dyslipidemia were significant independent predictors of a high edema index (odds ratio 3.59, P < 0.05 and odds ratio 4.05, P < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A high edema index is associated with the incidence of cardiovascular disease. Overhydration should be especially avoided in recipients with these factors, and their fluid volume should be carefully managed.

Pre-transplant maintenance dialysis duration and outcomes after kidney transplantation: A multicenter population-based cohort study

The association between pre-transplant dialysis duration and post-transplant outcomes may vary by the population and endpoints studied. We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada including kidney transplant recipients (n = 4461) from 2004-2014. Our primary outcome was total graft failure (i.e., death, return to dialysis, or pre-emptive re-transplant). Secondary outcomes included death-censored graft failure, death with graft function, mortality, hospitalization for cardiovascular events, hospitalization for infection, and hospital readmission. We presented results by pre-transplant dialysis duration (pre-emptive transplant, and 0.01-1.43, 1.44-2.64, 2.65-4.25, 4.26-6.45, and 6.46-36.5 years, for quintiles 1-5). After adjusting for clinical characteristics, pre-emptive transplantation was associated with a lower rate of total graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.99), while quintile 4 was associated with a higher rate (aHR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.71), when compared to quintile 1. There was no significant relationship between dialysis duration and death-censored graft failure, cardiovascular events, or hospital readmission. For death with graft function and mortality, quintiles 3-5 had a significantly higher aHR compared to quintile 1, while for infection, quintiles 2-5 had a higher aHR. Longer time on dialysis was associated with an increased rate of several adverse post-transplant outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Impact of Different Approaches to Kidney Transplant with and without Chronic Hemodialysis on Cardiac Function and Morphology: A Case-Control Study

Patients with end-stage renal disease have higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared with the general population. Preemptive kidney transplant (KTx) has been shown to be associated with improved survival, better quality of life, lower healthcare burden, and reduced cardiovascular risk. In this case–control study, we investigated the cardiovascular benefits of two approaches to KTx: with and without previous chronic hemodialysis. We enrolled 21 patients who underwent preemptive KTx and 21 matched controls who received chronic hemodialysis before KTx. Cardiac morphological and functional parameters were assessed by echocardiography. Overall, patients undergoing preemptive KTx showed less extensive cardiac damage compared with controls, as evidenced by higher global longitudinal strain, peak atrial and contractile strain, and early diastolic mitral annular velocity as well as a lower left ventricular mass, left atrial volume index, and the ratio of mitral inflow early diastolic velocity to the mitral annular early diastolic velocity. In the multivariable analysis, the presence of chronic hemodialysis prior to KTx was an independent determinant of post-transplant cardiac functional and structural remodeling. These findings may have important clinical implications, supporting the use of preemptive KTx as a preferred treatment strategy in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Evaluation of the learning curve of pediatric kidney transplantation anesthesia

Background/aim

Pediatric kidney transplantation (PKT) anesthesia brings some different challenges than adult kidney transplantation (KT) anesthesia and there are still no studies analyzing the role of experience on PKT outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the anesthesia learning curve in pediatric kidney transplants performed in our institution and the effect of increasing experience on renal transplantation-related data.

Materials and methods

Patients age ≤ 18 years who underwent KT were included in the study, while patients age >18 years were excluded. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the date of transplant, as the first 10 patients in Group 1, the second 10 patients in Group 2, and the final 11 in Group 3. Groups were compared according to recorded data.

Results

Thirty-one patients were included in the study. Age, sex, and body mass index were matched between the 3 groups. The mean durations of dialysis were 75.0 ± 63.0, 22.4 ± 27.9, and 5.7 ± 4.5 months for Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively (p = 0.009). Blood loss, duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) were comparable between the groups. The duration of anesthesia gradually shortened from Group 1 to Group 3 but there was no significant difference between the groups. The mean number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion was 0.9 ± 0.7 unit in group 1. It decreased to a mean of 0.6 ± 0.7 unit for group 2, and afterward significant decrease occurred down to 0 for group 3 (p = 0.004).

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that considering the decrease in preoperative dialysis duration and operative RBC transfusion, 20 patients may be enough for anesthesia competency. Transplantation anesthesia experience before PKT, anesthesia technique, and patient characteristics may differ between institutions. Therefore, further prospective studies with established learning curve goals, larger patient volumes, and more variables are needed to validate our results.

Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation Performed in a Low-Volume Center by Visiting Surgeons From a High-Volume Center and Managed Clinically Solely by Nephrologists: 1-Year Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the outcome of living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) performed in low-volume centers lacking the services of full-time transplant surgeons. This retrospective cohort study assessed the outcome of LDKT performed in a low-volume center by visiting transplant surgeons from a high-volume center and managed perioperatively by transplant nephrologists.

METHODS

We compared Japanese adult patients who had no donor-specific antibodies and underwent LDKT between 2006 and 2015 either in a low-volume (n = 31) or high-volume (n = 481) center. In the low-volume center, visiting transplant surgeons from the high-volume center conducted LDKT and transplant nephrologists managed the recipients peri- and postoperatively. The primary outcome was the composite of infection, cardiovascular disease, or cancer during 1-year follow-up. The outcomes of the low- and high-volume centers were compared using 1:2 propensity score matching.

RESULTS

After matching, 9 of 29 patients in the low-volume center (31.0%) and 16 of 58 patients in the high-volume center (27.6%) experienced the primary composite outcome (risk ratio = 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-2.23). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in graft function at 1 year, all-cause graft loss, biopsy-proven rejection, and urological complications. However, the median duration of post-LDKT hospitalization was significantly longer in the low-volume center than in the high-volume center (23 and 16 days, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Among Japanese patients without preformed donor-specific antibodies, LDKT conducted at a low-volume center by visiting transplant surgeons from a high-volume center and managed clinically by transplant nephrologists was not associated with significantly higher risk of postoperative complications.

Surgical complications in pediatric kidney transplantation-Incidence, risk factors, and effects on graft survival: A retrospective single-center study

The field of pediatric kidney transplantation remains challenging due to an ongoing lack of size-matched grafts and anatomical peculiarities. In the current study, we investigated the incidence of surgical complications in pediatric recipients, with a focus on risk factors and effects on graft outcome. We retrospectively reviewed all 2386 kidney transplantations at our institution from January 2005 until December 2018. Of these, 221 transplants were performed in pediatric recipients, defined as under the age of 18 years. Donor-recipient body surface area ratios were calculated to evaluate the effects of size mismatching. Regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for surgical complications and graft survival, respectively. Perioperative surgical complications requiring revision were observed in 34 (15.4%) cases. Leading cause for revision were vascular complications such as thrombosis or stenosis (n = 15 [6.8%]), which were significantly more frequent in case of young donors, (ie, donor age <6 years; OR: 4.281; CI-95%:1.385-13.226; P = .012), previous nephrectomy (OR: 3.407; CI-95%:1.019-11.387; P = .046), and en-bloc grafts (OR: 4.923; CI-95%:1.355-17.884; P = .015), followed by postoperative hemorrhage (n = 10 [4.5%]), ureteral complications (n = 8 [3.6%]), and lymphoceles (n = 7 [3.2%]). Median follow-up was 84.13 (0.92-175.72) months. One-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival rates were 97.1%, 88.9%, and 65.1%, respectively. Except for vascular complications (HR: 4.727; CI-95%:1.363-16.394; P = .014), none of the analyzed surgical morbidities significantly influenced graft survival. In conclusion, pediatric kidney transplantation achieves excellent long-term results. However, meticulous surgical technique and continuous postoperative monitoring are imperative for early detection and treatment of imminent vascular complications, especially in case of young donors and en-bloc grafts.

Influence of dialysis duration on outcomes of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess how pre-transplant dialysis duration affects transplant outcomes after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).

METHODS

Data of 6887 T1DM patients who underwent SPK transplantation between 2008 and 2018 were obtained from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. According to pre-transplant dialysis duration, the patients were divided into the preemptive SPK, 0-2 years, 2-5 years, and >5 years dialysis groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare patient and graft survival among the groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictors of transplant outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 56.7 ± 34.7 months. Compared with no dialysis or preemptive SPK, dialysis for 0-2 years was not significantly associated with patient or kidney graft survival, while long-term dialysis of 2-5 years and >5 years was significantly associated with increased risk of death and kidney graft failure. However, the duration of dialysis was not associated with pancreas graft survival.

CONCLUSION

Long-term dialysis duration before SPK transplant is an independent predictor of patient death and kidney graft failure in T1DM patients.

Practice patterns of dialysis access and outcomes in patients wait-listed early for kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Early kidney transplantation (KT) is the best option for patients with end-stage kidney disease, but little is known about dialysis access strategy in this context. We studied practice patterns of dialysis access and how they relate with outcomes in adults wait-listed early for KT according to the intended donor source.

METHODS

This study from the REIN registry (2002-2014) included 9331 incident dialysis patients (age 18-69) wait-listed for KT before or by 6 months after starting dialysis: 8342 candidates for deceased-donor KT and 989 for living-donor KT. Subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) of KT and death associated with hemodialysis by catheter or peritoneal dialysis compared with arteriovenous (AV) access were estimated with Fine and Gray models.

RESULTS

Living-donor candidates used pretransplant peritoneal dialysis at rates similar to deceased-donor KT candidates, but had significantly more frequent catheter than AV access for hemodialysis (adjusted OR 1.25; 95%CI 1.09-1.43). Over a median follow-up of 43 (IQR: 23-67) months, 6063 patients received transplants and 305 died before KT. Median duration of pretransplant dialysis was 15 (7-27) months for deceased-donor recipients and 9 (5-15) for living-donor recipients. Catheter use in deceased-donor candidates was associated with a lower SHR for KT (0.88, 95%CI 0.82-0.94) and a higher SHR for death (1.53, 95%CI 1.14-2.04). Only five deaths occurred in living-donor candidates, three of them with catheter use.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant dialysis duration may be quite long even when planned with a living donor. Advantages from protecting these patients from AV fistula creation must be carefully evaluated against catheter-related risks.

Mode of initial renal replacement therapy and transplant outcomes in the chronic kidney disease in children (CKiD) study

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant is the renal replacement therapy (RRT) of choice for children with end stage kidney disease (ESKD). Only 21.3% of children who initiate RRT receive a preemptive kidney transplant (PKT). We characterized the transition to RRT in children in the CKiD cohort including the prevalence of dialysis as first RRT vs. PKT and graft survival.

METHODS

258 children enrolled in CKiD have initiated RRT, and 202 had post-RRT initiation data collected through phone or in-person follow-up. Characteristics by first RRT modality were compared using Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Parametric-accelerated failure time models were fit for transplantation. Graft failure was characterized using Kaplan-Meier methods and log rank tests.

RESULTS

Sixty-one percent received dialysis as first RRT modality and 39% PKT. Those with PKT were less likely to have glomerular disease and to be African-American, and had higher household-income. African-American subjects were nearly twice as likely to undergo dialysis prior to transplant. Those with a living donor and a college-educated mother had 40%-decreased odds of being dialysis experienced. Children with PKT were more likely to receive a living donor transplant. Only 5% of PKT subjects had graft failure by 4 years compared to 16% of those initially treated with dialysis (p = 0.092); however, after adjustment the effect of dialysis exposure was attenuated (p = 0.206).

CONCLUSION

CKiD subjects undergo PKT more often compared to nationally-reported rates, and are more likely to receive a kidney transplant within 1 year of starting dialysis. African-American race and lower household-income are associated with decreased access to PKT.

Frailty is associated with dialysis duration before transplantation in kidney transplant recipients: A Japanese single-center cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence of frailty, and the relationship of frailty based on the Kihon Checklist criteria with dialysis duration before transplantation and time after transplantation in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

This study was a single-center, cross-sectional investigation carried out on kidney transplant recipients. To examine the association between the total Kihon Checklist score with time after transplant and dialysis duration before transplant, the multivariable proportional odds logistic regression model was used with adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum albumin levels.

RESULTS

Out of 205 kidney transplant recipients enrolled in this study, frail, prefrail and robust recipients accounted for 11.2%, 26.8% and 62.0%, respectively. Dialysis duration before transplantation was associated with frailty, but time after transplant was not associated with frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of frailty in kidney transplant recipients is approximately 11%, and it is associated with the duration of pretransplant dialysis. These findings suggest that a shorter dialysis duration might be beneficial for preventing frailty in kidney transplant recipients.

Prolonged dialysis duration is associated with graft failure and mortality after kidney transplantation: results from the French transplant database

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. Preemptive KT (PKT) should be considered when glomerular filtration rate is <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 but European reports on the results of PKT and the effect of pretransplant dialysis are scarce.

METHODS

We analysed all first kidney-only transplants performed in adults in France between 2002 and 2012. A Cox multivariable model was used to investigate the association of PKT and of pretransplant dialysis time with the hazard of graft failure defined as death, return to dialysis or retransplant, whichever occurred first.

RESULTS

We included 22 345 patients, with a mean ± SD age at KT of 50.5 ± 13.4 years; 61.9% were men and 3112 (14.0%) received a PKT. Median time of follow-up was 4.7 years. Graft failure occurred in 4952 patients up to 31 December 2013. After adjustment for recipients' age and sex, primary kidney disease, donor type (living or deceased donor, expanded criteria donor), HLA mismatches, cold ischaemia time, centre and year of transplantation, PKT was associated with a decreased hazard of graft failure when compared with pretransplant dialysis [hazard ratio (HR) 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.63], whatever the duration of dialysis, even in the first 6 months. The effect of PKT on the hazard of graft failure was stronger in living kidney donors (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.19-0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

In France, PKT was associated with a lower risk of graft failure than KT performed after the initiation of dialysis, whatever the duration of dialysis.

Remarkable Improvement of Cardiac Function After Pre-emptive Kidney Transplant in a Patient With Severe Mitral Regurgitation Accompanied by Low Cardiac Function: A Case Report

Patients with end-stage renal disease are at a high risk for cardiovascular diseases. It is controversial whether end-stage renal disease patients with low cardiac function can safely accept kidney transplant. Here, we present a 42-year-old kidney transplant recipient with severe mitral regurgitation accompanied by low cardiac function. He wanted to undergo a pre-emptive kidney transplant from his uncle. We decided to perform living kidney transplant prior to cardiac surgery. Despite adequate ultrafiltration and hemodiafiltration before operation, the patient's ejection fraction still remained 35% 1 day before transplant. He showed complete recovery of cardiac function in only 2 days after pre-emptive kidney transplant, although his body weight did not change before and after the operation. Early removal of the uremic toxin or inflammatory cytokines may play a role in rapid improvement of the cardiac function. Increase of vasoactive substances by improvement of kidney function may lead to reduction of afterload and amelioration of cardiac microcirculation. This report also suggests that optimal timing for operation might be important.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Preemptive Transplant and Transplant After a Short Period of Dialysis in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Propensity-Score-Based Analysis

BACKGROUND The permissible extent of pretransplant dialysis for patient and allograft survival is unclear. We assumed that a short period of dialysis before living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) will show the similar results as preemptive kidney transplantation (PKT). MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of LDKT according to pretransplant dialysis duration in both unmatched cohorts (n=1984) and propensity-score-matched cohorts (n=986) cohorts. The primary study endpoint was post-transplantation patient survival and death-censored graft survival (DCGS) according to the duration of pretransplant dialysis by 19 months which was the best cutoff value to differentiate clinical outcomes with the use of the time-dependent area under the curve. RESULTS Of 1984 patients with LDKT at our center between January 2005 and September 2016, PKT was performed in 429 patients. The durations of pretransplant dialysis were <19 months in 962 recipients and ≥19 months in 593 recipients. There was no significant difference in mortality and DCGS between PKT and non-PKT recipients with pretransplant dialysis of <19 months. Patient survival (P=0.024) and DCGS (P=0.001) were worse in non-PKT recipients with pretransplant dialysis of ≥19 months. In the matched cohort, DCGS was significantly lower in non-PKT recipients with pretransplant dialysis of ≥19 months (P=0.037). It is likely that the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was higher in this group (P=0.083). CONCLUSIONS Patient survival and DCGS were worse when the pretransplant dialysis duration was ³19 months in a propensity-score-matched LDKT cohort.

Association of Dialysis Duration With Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation in the Setting of Long Cold Ischemia Time

Background

There is no mechanism that matches hard-to-place kidneys with the most appropriate candidate. Thus, unwanted kidney offers are typically to recipients with long renal replacement time (vintage) which is a strong risk factor for mortality and graft failure, and in combination with prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT), may promote interactive effects on outcomes.

Methods

Consecutive adult isolated kidney transplants between October 2015 and December 2017 were stratified by vintage younger than 1 year and CIT longer than 30 hours.

Results

Long (n = 169) relative to short (n = 93) vintage recipients were significantly more likely to be younger (32.2 years vs 56.9 years, P = 0.02), black race (40.8% vs 18.3%, P = 0.02), have higher estimated posttransplant survival (52.6 vs 42.0, P = 0.04), and have a comorbid condition (45.6% vs 30.1%, P = 0.02); they were less likely to receive a donation after circulatory death kidney (27.8% vs 39.8%, P = 0.05). Long vintage was significantly associated with length of stay longer than 4 days (45.5% vs 30.1%, P = 0.02), and 30-day readmission (37.3% vs 22.6%, P = 0.02) but not additional operations (17.8% vs 15.1%, P = 0.58), short-term patient mortality (3.0% vs 2.2%, P = 0.70), or overall graft survival (P = 0.23). On multivariate logistic regression, long vintage remained an independent risk factor for 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-3.47); however, there was no interaction of vintage and CIT for this outcome (P = 0.84).

Conclusions

Readmission is significantly associated with pretransplant dialysis duration; however, CIT is not a modifying factor for this outcome.

Kidney transplantation for treatment of end-stage kidney disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: case series and literature review

BACKGROUND

The safety of kidney transplantation (KT) for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for haematological disease has not been investigated thoroughly.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicentre study, we investigated the clinical courses of six ESKD patients that received KT after HSCT for various haematological diseases. Data for six such patients were obtained from three institutions in our consortium.

RESULTS

Two patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia, one with refractory aplastic anaemia and another one with acute lymphocytic leukaemia received bone marrow transplantation. One patients with acute lymphocytic leukaemia received umbilical cord blood transplantation, and one with mantle cell lymphoma received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The patients developed ESKD at a median of 133 months after HSCT. Two patients who received KT and HSCT from the same donor were temporarily treated with immunosuppressive drugs. The other patients received KT and HSCT from different donors and were treated with antibody induction using our standard regimens. For one patient with ABO-incompatible transplantation, we added rituximab, splenectomy, and plasmapheresis. In the observational period at a median of 51 months after KT, only one patient experienced acute T-cell-mediated rejection. Four patients underwent hospitalization because of infection and fully recovered. No patient experienced recurrence of their original haematological disease. All patients survived throughout the observational periods, and graft functions were preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high infection frequency, survival rates and graft functions were extremely good in patients compared with previous studies. Therefore, current management contributed to favourable outcomes of these patients.

Kidney transplantation in older recipients: Preemptive high KDPI kidney vs lower KDPI kidney after varying dialysis vintage

AIM

To evaluate the outcomes of transplanting marginal kidneys preemptively compared to better-quality kidneys after varying dialysis vintage in older recipients.

METHODS

Using OPTN/United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2001-2015, we identified deceased donor kidney (DDK) transplant recipients > 60 years of age who either underwent preemptive transplantation of kidneys with kidney donor profile index (KDPI) ≥ 85% (marginal kidneys) or received kidneys with KDPI of 35%-84% (better quality kidneys that older wait-listed patients would likely receive if waited longer) after being on dialysis for either 1-4 or 4-8 years. Using a multivariate Cox model adjusting for donor, recipient and transplant related factors- overall and death-censored graft failure risks along with patient death risk of preemptive transplant recipients were compared to transplant recipients in the 1-4 and 4-8 year dialysis vintage groups.

RESUTLS

The median follow up for the whole group was 37 mo (interquartile range of 57 mo). A total of 6110 DDK transplant recipients above the age of 60 years identified during the study period were found to be eligible to be included in the analysis. Among these patients 350 received preemptive transplantation of kidneys with KDPI ≥ 85. The remaining patients underwent transplantation of better quality kidneys with KDPI 35-84% after being on maintenance dialysis for either 1-4 years (n = 3300) or 4-8 years (n = 2460). Adjusted overall graft failure risk and death-censored graft failure risk in preemptive high KDPI kidney recipients were similar when compared to group that received lower KDPI kidney after being on maintenance dialysis for either 1-4 years (HR 1.01, 95%CI: 0.90-1.14, P = 0.84 and HR 0.96, 95%CI: 0.79-1.16, P = 0.66 respectively) or 4-8 years (HR 0.82, 95%CI: 0.63-1.07, P = 0.15 and HR 0.81, 95%CI: 0.52-1.25, P = 0.33 respectively). Adjusted patient death risk in preemptive high KDPI kidney recipients were similar when compared to groups that received lower KDPI kidney after being on maintenance dialysis for 1-4 years (HR 0.99, 95%CI: 0.87-1.12, P = 0.89) but lower compared to patients who were on dialysis for 4-8 years (HR 0.74, 95%CI: 0.56-0.98, P = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

In summary, our study supports accepting a “marginal” quality high KDPI kidney preemptively in older wait-listed patients thus avoiding dialysis exposure.

Slow Progression of Aortic Calcification Is a Potential Benefit of Pre-emptive Kidney Transplantation

PURPOSE

Pre-emptive kidney transplantation (PKT) is expected to improve graft and cardiovascular event-free survival compared with standard kidney transplantation. Aortic calcification is reported to be closely associated with renal dysfunction and cardiovascular events; however, its implication in PKT recipients remains incompletely explored. This aim of this study was to evaluate whether PKT confers a protective effect on aortic calcification, renal function, graft survival, and cardiovascular event-free survival.

METHODS

One hundred adult patients who underwent renal transplantation between January 1996 and March 2016 at Hirosaki University Hospital and Oyokyo Kidney Research Institute were included. Among them, 19 underwent PKT and 81 patients underwent pretransplant dialysis. We retrospectively compared pretransplant and post-transplant aortic calcification index (ACI), renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]), and graft and cardiovascular event-free survivals between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The median age of this cohort was 45 years. Preoperative ACI was significantly lower in PKT recipients. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding postoperative eGFR, graft survival, and cardiovascular event-free survival. However, the ACI progression rate (ΔACI/y) was significantly lower in PKT recipients than in those who underwent pretransplant dialysis. Higher ACI was significantly associated with poor cardiovascular event-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

PKT is beneficial in that it contributes to the slow progression of after transplantation. Although we could not observe significant differences in graft and cardiovascular event-free survivals between the 2 groups, slow progression of aortic calcification showed a potential to decrease cardiovascular events in PKT recipients during long-term follow-up.

Effectiveness of Preceding Solo Kidney Transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes With End-Stage Renal Failure

Preceding solo kidney transplantation for type 1 diabetes with end-stage renal failure is controversial because of less pancreatic graft survival in pancreas transplantation after kidney transplantation (PAK) than in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK).

METHODS

To study the effectiveness of preceding solo kidney transplantation for type 1 diabetes with end-stage renal failure, comparative retrospective analysis was performed between SPK (n = 232) and PAK (n = 39) that were performed until December 2016.

RESULTS

At 1, 3, and 5 years, pancreatic graft survival in SPK was 87.5%, 86.4%, and 82.8%, respectively, and 87.1%, 65.0%, and 49.1%, respectively, in PAK, which showed lesser long-term graft survival than SPK. Because 10 cases out of 16 (62.5%) failed into pancreatic graft loss with rejection in PAK, which was about 3 times more than in SPK, control of rejection is very important; rejection episodes were decreased by rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction resulting in improved graft survival. Five-year patient survival was 88.0% in SPK and 96.6% in PAK.

CONCLUSION

Considering patient survival, preceding solo kidney transplantation for type 1 diabetes with end-stage renal failure should be performed if a donor is available.

Considerations on the Factors Influencing Living Kidney Donors' Autonomous Decision-Making: A Systematic Literature Review

As outcomes of organ transplantation have improved with advances in medicine, managing medical ethics issues has become increasingly more important. Although a basic consensus has been formed on the respect of autonomy in decision-making by prospective donors regarding living kidney transplantation, concrete and practical measures at the clinical site are required to ensure donor autonomy. The aim of the study was to identify elements related to autonomy in the kidney donor decision-making process.

METHODS

We systematically collected relevant studies from multiple databases in and out of Japan and conducted qualitative and inductive analyses.

RESULTS

The identified elements were categorized into 12 subcategories and then regrouped into the following 4 categories based on the similarity of the contents: donor personality and values, inability to fully understand the implications of donation, possibility of direct pressure on donor's decision-making process, and donor's environment and situation.

DISCUSSION

The autonomy-related elements were highly diverse, including obvious pressure upon the donor and their values as well as influences from health care professionals. Some elements had room for change, such as the informed consent procedure, while some elements were unchangeable. Other elements were changeable by intervention, but discussion is required about the appropriateness of the intervention itself. Further, a classification of clinical approach was suggested by the development of an analytical framework using 2 axes of "site where the element arises" and "room for change" based on the practical viewpoint of clinical circumstances.

Preemptive kidney transplantation: a propensity score matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

The reasons for improved outcomes associated with preemptive kidney transplantation (PKT) are incompletely understood, and post-transplant complications have been scarcely investigated.

METHODS

We evaluated the outcomes of PKT in both unmatched (n = 1060) and propensity score matched cohorts (n = 186) of adults who underwent living kidney transplant between 2000 and 2014. Outcomes were estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), biopsy-proven rejection, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), cardiovascular disease (CVD), graft failure (non-censored for death), and malignancy. Primary endpoint was post-transplant renal function assessed with eGFR.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients (9.0 %) underwent PKT. The 2-week mean eGFR after transplant was comparable between the matched PKT and non-PKT groups (45.2 vs. 46.5 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively, P = 0.56). Sensitivity analysis using various formulas did not change the results. PKT was not superior to non-PKT in reducing the risk of biopsy-proven rejection, CMV, PTDM, and malignancy, regardless of matching. The risk of graft failure and CVD was significantly reduced in the unmatched PKT group (ARR, -6.2 %; 95 % CI, -8.6 to -0.7; P = 0.03, and ARR, -6.7 %; 95 % CI, -9.6 to -0.7, P = 0.03, respectively); nevertheless, the corresponding ARRs were -3.2 % (95 % CI, -10.0 to 2.9; P = 0.44) and -2.2 % (95 % CI, -9.1 to 4.4; P = 0.72) after matching.

CONCLUSIONS

PKT was associated with neither improvement of post-transplant renal function nor a lower rate of common post-transplant complications than non-PKT among patients with end-stage renal disease who underwent living KT.