Socioeconomic differences in the uptake of home dialysis

Home dialysis as the incident modality in patients starting dialysis in West Virginia: role of the rural outreach kidney care clinic

BACKGROUND

Despite efforts to increase its use, home dialysis remains underutilized as a modality for kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Home dialysis may offer an advantage in rural areas. We evaluated the role of a rural outreach program on the use of home dialysis as incident KRT modality in West Virginia.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Data on KRT were collected using the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) database from 1965 to 2020.

RESULTS

Of the total 22,408 West Virginia patients who started KRT with a dialysis modality between 1965 and 2020, 3203 (14.3%) patients started with a home modality. Among patients from counties served by a rural outreach clinic providing kidney care, 896 (18%) patients started with home dialysis compared to 2306 (13%) patients from other counties. Patients from counties served by a rural outreach clinic were more likely to be White (96 vs 90%), have comorbid illness, and live in a rural community (90 vs 56%), but less likely to be unemployed (11 vs 14%), all p < 0.001. In a multivariable model, after adjusting for comorbid medical conditions and rurality, the odds of starting dialysis with a home modality were greater for patients from counties served by a rural clinic than for patients from counties without such clinics (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.15-1.7).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ESKD from West Virginia counties served by rural outreach clinics were more likely to initiate KRT by a home-based modality than patients from other counties in West Virginia.

Social determinants of health and dialysis modality selection in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health are non-medical factors that impact health. For patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) progressing to kidney failure, the influence of social determinants of health on dialysis modality selection (haemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis (PD)) is incompletely understood.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 981 consecutive patients with advanced CKD referred to the Ottawa Hospital Multi-Care Kidney Clinic (Canada) who progressed to dialysis from 2010 to 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure odds ratios (OR) for the associations between social determinants of health (education, employment, marital status and residence) and modality of dialysis initiation.

RESULTS

The mean age and estimated glomerular filtration rate were 64 and 18 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Not having a high school degree was associated with lower odds of initiating dialysis via PD compared to having a college degree (29% vs. 48%, OR 0.55 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.88)). Unemployment was associated with lower odds of initiating dialysis via PD compared to active employment (38% vs. 62%, OR 0.40 (95% CI 0.27-0.60)). Being single was associated with lower odds of initiating dialysis via PD compared to being married (35% vs. 48%, adjusted OR 0.52 (95% CI 0.39-0.70)). Living alone at home was associated with lower odds of initiating dialysis via PD compared to living at home with family (33% vs. 47%, adjusted OR 0.55 (95% CI 0.39-0.78)).

CONCLUSIONS

Social determinants of health including education, employment, marital status and residence are associated with dialysis modality selection. Addressing these 'upstream' social factors may allow for more equitable outcomes during the transition from advanced CKD to kidney failure.

Social determinants of health influencing the choice of dialysis modality in advanced chronic kidney disease: Need of an interdisciplinary approach

INTRODUCTION

The influence of socioeconomic and cultural barriers in the choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT) techniques in advanced chronic kidney disease (ACKD) has been scarcely explored, which can generate problems of inequity, frequently unnoticed in health care. The aim of this study is to identify the "non-medical" barriers that influence the choice of RRT in an advanced chronic kidney disease (ACKD) consultation in Spain.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis including the total number of patients seen in the ACKD consultation in a tertiary hospital from 2009 to 2020. Inclusion in the ACKD consultation began with an eligibility test and a decision-making process, conducted by a specifically trained nurse. The variables considered for the study were: age, sex, etiology of CKD, level of dependence for basic activities of daily living (Barthel Scale) and instrumental activities of daily living (Lawton and Brody Scale), Spanish versus foreign nationality, socioeconomic level and language barrier. The socioeconomic level was extrapolated according to home and health district by primary care center to which the patients belonged.

RESULTS

A total of 673 persons were seen in the ACKD consultation during the study period, of whom 400 (59.4%) opted for hemodialysis (HD), 156 (23.1%) for peritoneal dialysis (PD), 4 (0.5%) for early living donor renal transplantation (LDRT) and 113 (16.7%) chose conservative care (CC). The choice of PD as the chosen RRT technique (vs. HD) was associated with people with a high socioeconomic level (38.7% vs. 22.5%) (p = 0.002), Spanish nationality (91% vs. 77.7%) (p < 0.001), to a lower language barrier (0.6% vs 10.5%) (p < 0.001), and to a higher score on the Barthel scale (97.4 vs 92.9) and on the Lawton and Brody scale (7 vs 6.1) (p < 0.001). Neither age nor sex showed significant differences in the choice of both techniques. Patients who opted for CC were significantly older (81.1 vs 67.7 years; p < 0.001), more dependent (p < 0.001), with a higher proportion of women (49.6% vs 35.2%; p = 0.006) and a higher proportion of Spaniards (94.7% vs 81%, p = 0.001) in relation to the choice of other techniques (PD and HD). Socioeconomic level did not influence the choice of CC.

CONCLUSION

Despite a regulated decision-making process, there are factors such as socioeconomic status, migration, language barrier and dependency of the population that influence the type of RRT chosen. To address these aspects that may cause inequity, an intersectoral and multilevel intervention is required with interdisciplinary teams that include, among others, social workers, to provide a more holistic and person-centered assessment.

Is social deprivation associated with the peritoneal dialysis outcomes? A cohort study with REIN registry data

BACKGROUND

Social deprivation is associated with lower peritoneal dialysis (PD) uptake. This study was carried out to evaluate the role of social deprivation on the outcome of PD.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of data extracted from the Renal Epidemiology and Information Network registry for patients older than 18 years who started PD in metropolitan France between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2018. The end of the observation period was 31 December 2020. The exposure was the European Deprivation Index calculated using the patient's address. The events of interest were death, transfer to haemodialysis (HD), transplantation and the composite event of death or transfer to HD. A Cox model and Fine and Gray model were used for the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1581 patients were included, of whom 418 (26.5%) belonged to Quintile 5 of the European Deprivation Index (the most deprived patients). In the Cox model, the most deprived subjects did not have a greater risk of death (cause-specific hazard ratio (cs-HR): 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-1.10], transfer to HD (cs-HR 1.37 [95% CI: 0.95-1.98]) or the composite event of death or transfer to HD (cs-HR: 1.08 [95% CI: 0.84-1.38]) or a lower risk of kidney transplantation (cs-HR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.48-1.10]). In the competing risk analysis, the most deprived subjects had a higher risk of transfer to HD (subdistribution hazard ratio (sd-HR): 1.54 [95% CI: 1.08-2.19]) and lower access to kidney transplantation (sd-HR: 0.68 [0.46-0.99]).

CONCLUSION

In PD patients, social deprivation was not associated with death or the composite event of death or transfer to HD. Socially deprived individuals had a greater risk of transfer to HD and lower access to kidney transplantation in the competing risk analysis.

Body image, emotional intelligence and quality of life in peritoneal dialysis patients

Background

End-stage-renal-disease is one of the most common chronic diseases, and peritoneal dialysis constitutes one of the replacement therapies. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of patients on peritoneal dialysis regarding their body image, to assess their quality of life and level of emotional intelligence.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was performed with structured questionnaires. The sample of the study was the patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis and monitored by the nephrology clinics of 7 public hospitals in Greece.

Results

A total of 102 completed questionnaires were collected and analyzed (68% response rate). The participants showed moderate degree of body-image dysphoria (mean = 1.29, SD = 0.94), moderate levels of emotional intelligence and experienced moderate quality of life. According to the statistical analysis, women reported worse body image (p = 0.013) and university graduates showed higher levels of emotionality (p = 0.016). The correlations between the quality of life questionnaire subscales and demographic characteristics revealed statistically significant relationships between marital status and the Physical Functionality subscale, where unmarried people had a better quality of life in this subscale (p = 0.042) and between postgraduate/doctoral degree holders and the subscale Patient Satisfaction (p = 0.035). Also, statistically significant relationships were found between occupation and the Social Interaction subscale, where those engaged in household activities and were unemployed (p = 0.022) showed better quality of life. Participants living in semi-urban areas had better quality of life on the subscale Burden of Kidney Disease (p = 0.034).

Conclusion

ESRD patients on peritoneal dialysis suffer significant limitations related to disease and treatment modality. According to our findings, these affect both their body image as well as their quality of life. Improvement in emotional intelligence is the factor which plays an important mediating role in improving both body image and quality of life in patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Financial toxicity experienced by rural Australian families with chronic kidney disease

AIM

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its treatment places a financial burden on healthcare systems and households worldwide, yet little is known of its financial impact, on those who reside in rural settings. We aimed to quantify the financial impacts and out-of-pocket expenditure experienced by adult rural patients with CKD in Australia.

METHODS

A web based structured survey was completed between November 2020 and January 2021. English speaking participants over 18 years of age, diagnosed with CKD stages 3-5, those receiving dialysis or with a kidney transplant, who lived in a rural location in Australia.

RESULTS

In total 77 (69% completion rate) participated. The mean out of pocket expenses were 5056 AUD annually (excluding private health insurance costs), 78% of households experienced financial hardship with 54% classified as experiencing financial catastrophe (out-of-pocket expenditure greater than 10% of household income). Mean distances to access health services for all rural and remote classifications was greater than 50 kilometres for specialist nephrology services and greater than 300 kilometres for transplanting centres. Relocation for a period greater than 3 months to access care was experienced by 24% of participants.

CONCLUSION

Rural households experience considerable financial hardship due to out-of-pocket costs in accessing treatment for CKD and other health-related care, raising concerns about equity in Australia, a high-income country with universal healthcare.

Characteristics and outcomes of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients with dialysis-dependent kidney disease in Australian intensive care units

BACKGROUND

In Australia, 531 people per million population have dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD5D). The incidence is four times higher for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (indigenous) people compared with non-Indigenous Australians. CKD5D increases the risk of hospitalisation, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality compared with patients without CKD5D. There is limited literature describing short-term outcomes of patients with CKD5D who are admitted to the ICU, comparing indigenous and non-indigenous patients.

AIMS

This registry-based retrospective cohort analysis compared demographic and clinical data between indigenous and non-indigenous patients with CKD5D and tested whether indigenous status predicted short-term outcomes independently of other contributing factors. Adjusted hospital mortality was the primary outcome measure.

METHODS

Data were from the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society's Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation Adult Patient Database. Australian ICU admissions between 2010 and 2017 were included. Data from 173 ICU (2136 beds) include 1 051 697 ICU admissions, of which 23 793 had a pre-existing diagnosis of CKD5D.

RESULTS

Indigenous patients comprised 11.9% of CKD5D patients in ICU. CKD5D was prevalent among 4.9% of indigenous and 2.9% of non-indigenous ICU admissions. Indigenous patients were 13.5 years younger, had fewer comorbidities and lower crude mortality despite equivalent calculated mortality risk. After adjusting for age, remoteness and severity of illness, indigenous status did not predict mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic disadvantage contributes to earlier development of CKD5D and the overrepresentation in ICU of indigenous people. Mortality is equivalent once correcting for confounders, but addressing inequality requires strengthening preventative care.

Clinicians' perspectives on equity of access to dialysis and kidney transplantation for rural people in Australia: a semistructured interview study

OBJECTIVES

People with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation in rural areas have worse outcomes, including an increased risk of hospitalisation and mortality and encounter many barriers to accessing kidney replacement therapy. We aim to describe clinicians' perspectives of equity of access to dialysis and kidney transplantation in rural areas.

DESIGN

Qualitative study with semistructured interviews.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Twenty eight nephrologists, nurses and social workers from 19 centres across seven states in Australia.

RESULTS

We identified five themes: the tyranny of distance (with subthemes of overwhelming burden of travel, minimising relocation distress, limited transportation options and concerns for patient safety on the roads); supporting navigation of health systems (reliance on local champions, variability of health literacy, providing flexible models of care and frustrated by gatekeepers); disrupted care (without continuity of care, scarcity of specialist services and fluctuating capacity for dialysis); pervasive financial distress (crippling out of pocket expenditure and widespread socioeconomic disadvantage) and understanding local variability (lacking availability of safe and sustainable resources for dialysis, sensitivity to local needs and dependence on social support).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians identified geographical barriers, dislocation from homes and financial hardship to be major challenges for patients in accessing kidney replacement therapy. Strategies such as telehealth, outreach services, increased service provision and patient navigators were suggested to improve access.

Exploring rural and remote patients' experiences of health services for kidney disease in Aotearoa New Zealand: An in-depth interview study

AIMS

People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) living in rural communities have increased risks of death, morbidity, hospitalization and poorer quality of life compared with people with CKD living in urban areas. This study explores the experiences and perceptions of rural and remote patients and families in relation to accessing health services for kidney disease in Aotearoa New Zealand.

METHODS

We conducted an In-depth interview study. We purposively sampled adult patients with CKD and their caregivers who lived further than 100 km (62 miles) or more than 1 h drive from their nearest dialysis or transplant centre. Qualitative data were analyzed inductively to generate themes, subthemes and a conceptual framework.

RESULTS

Of 35 participants, including 26 patients and nine caregivers, 51% were female, 71% travelled between 1 and 3 h to their nearest renal unit, and the remainder, between 3 and 6 h. We identified five themes and related subthemes: intense psychological impact of rurality; pressure of extended periods away from home; services not designed for rural and remote living; suffering from financial losses; and poor communication.

CONCLUSION

Rural and remote patients with CKD and their caregivers face the added challenges of separation from family, social and community support and financial burden, which can have profound consequences on their psychological and physical well-being and that of their families.

Socioeconomic disparity, access to care and patient relevant outcomes after kidney allograft failure

Social disparity is a major impediment to optimal health outcomes after kidney transplantation. In this study, we aimed to define the association between socioeconomic status (SES) disparities and patient-relevant outcomes after kidney allograft failure. Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant registry, we included patients with failed first kidney allografts in Australia between 2005-2017. The association between residential postcode-derived SES in quintiles (quintile 1-most disadvantaged areas, quintile 5-most advantaged areas) with uptake of home dialysis (peritoneal or home haemodialysis) within the first 12-months post-allograft failure, repeat transplantation and death on dialysis were examined using competing-risk analysis. Of 2175 patients who had experienced first allograft failure, 417(19%) and 505(23%) patients were of SES quintiles 1 and 5, respectively. Compared to patients of quintile 5, quintile 1 patients were less likely to receive repeat transplants (adjusted subdistributional hazard ratio [SHR] 0.70,95%CI 0.55-0.89) and were more likely to die on dialysis (1.37[1.04-1.81]), but there was no association with the uptake of home dialysis (1.02[0.77-1.35]). Low SES may have a negative effect on outcomes post-allograft failure and further research is required into how best to mitigate this. However, small-scale variation within SES cannot be accounted for in this study.

Effect of social deprivation on peritoneal dialysis uptake: A mediation analysis with the data of the REIN registry

BACKGROUND

Social deprivation could act as a barrier to peritoneal dialysis (PD). The objective of this study was to assess the association between social deprivation estimated by the European deprivation index (EDI) and PD uptake and to explore the potential mediators of this association.

METHODS

From the Renal Epidemiology and Information Network registry, patients who started dialysis in 2017 were included. The EDI was calculated based on the patient's address. The event of interest was the proportion of PD 3 months after dialysis initiation. A mediation analysis with a counterfactual approach was carried out to evaluate the direct and indirect effect of the EDI on the proportion of PD.

RESULTS

Among the 9588 patients included, 1116 patients were on PD; 2894 (30.2%) patients belonged to the most deprived quintile (Q5). PD was associated with age >70 years (odds ratio (OR) 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.91]), male gender (0.85 [95% CI: 0.74-0.97]), cardiovascular disease (OR 0.86 [95% CI: 0.86-1.00]), chronic heart failure (OR 1.34 [95% CI: 1.13-1.58]), active cancer (OR 0.67 [95% CI: 0.53-0.85]) and obesity (OR 0.75 [95% CI: 0.63-0.89]). In the mediation analysis, Q5 had a direct effect on PD proportion OR 0.84 [95% CI: 0.73-0.96]. The effect of Q5 on the proportion of PD was mediated by haemoglobin level at dialysis initiation (OR 0.96 [95% CI: 0.94-0.98]) and emergency start (OR 0.98 [95% CI: 0.96-0.99]).

CONCLUSION

Social deprivation, estimated by the EDI, was associated with a lower PD uptake. The effect of social deprivation was mediated by haemoglobin level, a proxy of predialysis care and emergency start.

Gender differences in peritoneal dialysis initiation in the US end-stage renal disease population

BACKGROUND

Overall, a disproportionately small number of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients start peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the United States compared to hemodialysis. Little is known about whether gender has an effect on the initial modality of renal replacement therapy utilized by patients; however, prior studies have demonstrated gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of various other health conditions, including kidney disease.

METHODS

Using data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS), we estimated the proportion of patients utilizing PD as their initial dialysis modality between 2000 and 2014, adjusting estimates to the mean value of all covariates and compared these estimates for women and men.

RESULTS

We found that 7.9% of women and 7.5% of men used PD as their initial dialysis modality. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of women initiating PD as their initial modality compared to men was 1.04 (95% CI 1.02-1.05, p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, race, ethnicity, cause of ESRD, number of comorbidities, income, employment status, and timing of referral to nephrology, the difference was even more significant, with women being 12% (OR 1.12, CI 1.10-1.14, p < 0.001) more likely to initiate PD than men. However, within different subgroups, older women and women with higher number of comorbidities were less likely to be on PD than their male counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that gender plays a role in the initial dialysis modality used by patients and providers should be cognizant of these gender differences. Further studies are needed to ascertain the cause of this observed difference.

Socioeconomic Factors and Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Initiation of Home Dialysis

Rationale & Objective

Home dialysis has been underused in the United States, especially among minority groups. We investigated whether adjustment for socioeconomic factors would attenuate racial/ethnic differences in the initiation of home dialysis.

Study Design

Retrospective observational cohort study.

Setting & Population

Adult patients in the US Renal Data System who initiated dialysis on day 1 with either in-center hemodialysis (HD), home HD (HHD), or peritoneal dialysis (PD) from 2005 to 2013.

Predictor

Race/ethnicity: non-Hispanic white, Hispanic, black, or Asian.

Outcome

Initiating dialysis with PD versus in-center HD and HHD versus in-center HD for each minority group compared with non-Hispanic whites.

Analytical Approach

Odds ratios and 95% CIs estimated by logistic regression.

Results

Of 523,526 patients, 55% were white, 28% were black, 13% were Hispanic, and 4% were Asian; 8% started dialysis on PD, and 0.1%, on HHD. In unadjusted analyses, blacks and Hispanics were 30% and 19% less likely and Asians were 31% more likely to start on PD than whites. The differences narrowed when fully adjusted for demographic, medical, and socioeconomic factors. Adjustment for socioeconomic factors reduced these differences between white and black, Hispanic, and Asian patients by 13%, 28%, and 1%, respectively. Blacks were just as likely and Hispanics and Asians were less likely to start on HHD than whites. This did not change appreciably when fully adjusted for demographic, medical, and socioeconomic factors.

Limitations

No data for physician and patient preferences or modality education.

Conclusions

Black and Hispanic patients are less likely to start on PD than white patients, attributable partly, though not completely, to socioeconomic factors. Hispanics and Asians are less likely to start on HHD than whites. This was materially unaffected by socioeconomic factors. More research is needed to determine whether urgent-start PD programs and transitional care units in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas might reduce these disparities and increase home dialysis use among all groups.

Is self-care dialysis associated with social deprivation in a universal health care system? A cohort study with data from the Renal Epidemiology and Information Network Registry

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic status is associated with dialysis modality in developed countries. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether social deprivation, estimated by the European Deprivation Index (EDI), was associated with self-care dialysis in France.

METHODS

The EDI was calculated for patients who started dialysis in 2017. The event of interest was self-care dialysis 3 months after dialysis initiation [self-care peritoneal dialysis (PD) or satellite haemodialysis (HD)]. A logistic model was used for the statistical analysis, and a counterfactual approach was used for the causal mediation analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 9588 patients included, 2894 (30%) were in the most deprived quintile of the EDI. A total of 1402 patients were treated with self-care dialysis. In the multivariable analysis with the EDI in quintiles, there was no association between social deprivation and self-care dialysis. Compared with the other EDI quintiles, patients from Quintile 5 (most deprived quintile) were less likely to be on self-care dialysis (odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.93). Age, sex, emergency start, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, cancer, severe disability, serum albumin and registration on the waiting list were associated with self-care dialysis. The EDI was not associated with self-care dialysis in either the HD or in the PD subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

In France, social deprivation estimated by the EDI is associated with self-care dialysis in end-stage renal disease patients undergoing replacement therapy.

Patients’ Perceptions and Factors Affecting Dialysis Modality Decisions

Background

Home-based dialysis, including peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD), has been shown to be associated with lower costs and higher health-related quality of life than in-center HD. However, factors influencing the choice of dialysis modality, including gender, are still not well understood.

Methods

A questionnaire was sent out to all dialysis patients in the western region of Sweden in order to investigate factors affecting choice of dialysis modality. Logistic regression was used to analyze the data.

Results

Patients were more likely to have home dialysis if they received predialysis information from 3 or more sources and, to a greater extent, perceived the information as comprehensive and of high quality. In addition, patients had a lower likelihood of receiving home dialysis with increasing age and if they lived closer to a dialysis center. Men had in comparison with women a greater likelihood of receiving home dialysis if they lived with a spouse. In-center dialysis patients more often believed that the social interaction and support provided through in-center HD treatment influenced the choice of dialysis modality.

Conclusion

This study highlights the need for increased awareness of various factors that influence the choice of dialysis modality and the importance of giving repeated, comprehensive, high-quality information to dialysis and predialysis patients and their relatives. Information and support must be adapted to the needs of individual patients and their relatives if the intention is to improve patients’ well-being and the proportion of patients using home dialysis.

Cost Controversies of a "Home Dialysis First" Policy

Purpose of review

Kidney Failure is highly prevalent and uses a disproportionate amount of health care funding. In Canada (excluding Quebec), 37 647 people were living with kidney failure in 2016. The single-payer Canadian health care system spends approximately 1.2% of their annual budget on kidney failure. In 2016, 58.4% of patients with kidney failure in Canada (excluding Quebec) were on dialysis as opposed to living with a functioning kidney transplant. Home dialysis modalities including peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HD) were used by 18.9% and 4.7% of these patients, respectively. In-center HD and home dialysis (PD and home HD) are often considered equally efficacious and have similar impacts on quality of life. Despite cost minimization analyses suggesting that home dialysis offers cost savings over in-center HD, there has been a slow uptake of home dialysis in developed nations over time, suggesting that controversies and barriers to implementation currently exist. The primary objective of this health policy briefing article is to introduce and address some of the major controversies surrounding the cost effectiveness in supporting advocacy for a "Home Dialysis First" policy with a primary focus on single-payer systems in a developed nation such as Canada.

Sources of information

Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), Canadian and US epidemiologic databases, national/international conference presentations, primary literature review, and discussion with experts within the field of home dialysis.

Methods

We have conducted a focused primary literature review alongside individuals with expertise in the field of home dialysis to discuss the cost controversies surrounding the implementation of a "Home Dialysis First" policy.

Key findings

First, the primary literature is limited to mostly observational studies which are highly variable in study design and content. Local economic assessments, however, have provided convincing data for home dialysis cost savings in Canada. Second, the cost of delivering dialysis differs significantly throughout the world, explained by differing costs of labor and supplies in developing nations. Third, the indirect patient costs of water, energy, and home modifications are often barriers to implementation and may be overcome by introducing cost reimbursement programs. Fourth, home dialysis requires upfront training costs. We explore the impact of premature switches from home dialysis to in-center HD or a functioning kidney transplant on overall cost savings. Fifth, we discuss the effect of physician financial incentives and program funding on the uptake of home dialysis. Finally, we introduce the controversial topic of comparing the societal value of freedom of modality choice against the societal cost savings of a "Home Dialysis First" policy.

Limitations

Narrative reviews, due to their inherently reduced methodological quality in comparison with systematic reviews, may expose our collected literature to selection bias. We have attempted to compose a diverse collection of available literature alongside consensus expertise to provide a fair and concise review of home dialysis cost controversies.

Implications

Implementation of a "Home Dialysis First" policy would be a disruptive change to kidney failure care in Canada. To make informed policy decisions, we should recognize the cost savings associated with home dialysis in developed nations, the significance of patient-borne costs as a barrier to implementation, the impact of training costs and early modality switching in home dialysis, the lack of evidence regarding physician financial incentives, and the importance of program funding. Ultimately, we must consider the societal value of freedom of patient modality choice in comparison with the potential cost savings of a "Home Dialysis First" policy.

Peritoneal Dialysis Does Not Carry the Same Risk as Hemodialysis in Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Dialysis has been associated with increased complication rates following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The current literature on this issue is limited and does not distinguish between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the differences in the infection and other complication rates after THA or TKA between patients on peritoneal dialysis and those on hemodialysis and (2) the differences in complication rates after THA or TKA between patients on peritoneal dialysis and matched controls without dialysis dependence.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone primary THA or TKA from 2005 to 2014 were identified in the 100% Medicare files; 531 patients who underwent TKA and 572 patients who underwent THA were on peritoneal dialysis. These patients were matched 1:1 to patients on hemodialysis and 1:3 with patients who were not receiving either form of dialysis. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to examine several adverse events, including the prevalence of infection at 1 year and hospital readmission at 30 days.

RESULTS

The infection rates at 1 year after THA were significantly lower in the peritoneal dialysis group than in the hemodialysis group: 1.57% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.7% to 3.0%) and 4.20% (95% CI = 2.7% to 6.2%), respectively, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.30 (95% CI = 0.12 to 0.71). This was also the case for the infection rates 1 year after TKA (3.39% [95% CI = 2.0% to 5.3%] and 6.03% [95% CI = 4.2% to 8.4%], respectively; OR = 0.67 [95% CI = 0.49 to 0.93]). Peritoneal dialysis appears to result in a similar infection rate when compared with matched controls. The rates of other assessed complications, such as hospital readmission, emergency room visits, and mortality, were very similar between the peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis groups but were often significantly higher than the rates in non-dialysis-dependent controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased risk of complications in dialysis-dependent patients following THA or TKA depends on the mode of the dialysis. Whereas patients on hemodialysis have a significantly higher risk of infection, patients on peritoneal dialysis do not appear to have this same risk when compared with non-dialysis-dependent patients. These results suggest that the mode of dialysis should be considered when assessing the risk associated with THA or TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Socioeconomic status and dialysis quality of care

AIM

Lower socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with increased dialysis mortality. This study aimed to determine if the quality of care (QOC) delivered to dialysis patients varied by SES.

METHODS

All non-Indigenous adults commencing haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) registered with the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry between 2002 and 2012 were included. Each patient's location at dialysis start was classified into SES quartiles of advantaged to disadvantaged. Guidelines were used to determine attainment of adequate QOC at 6-<18 months and 18-<30 months after dialysis start, using logistic regression models. QOC measures included pre-dialysis phosphate, calcium, haemoglobin, transferrin saturation and ferritin. HD-related parameters included single pool Kt/V and percentage with functioning arteriovenous fistula/graft. PD-related parameters included weekly Kt/V and percentage transferring to HD.

RESULTS

Of 19 486 commencing dialysis, the median age was 65 years (interquartile range 53-74), 62.2% were male and 85.1% were Caucasian. At 6-<18 months after dialysis start, there were no significant differences by SES in attainment of biochemical targets, PD or HD adequacy. The disadvantaged quartile was less likely to achieve haemoglobin targets (odds ratio 0.88, 0.80-0.96, P = 0.01) or have a functioning arteriovenous fistula or graft (odds ratio 0.79, 0.68-0.92, P = 0.003) compared with the most advantaged group. Vascular access differences persisted at 18-<30 months.

CONCLUSION

Other than vascular access, area-level SES has minimal impact on QOC attainment among non-Indigenous dialysis patients in Australia. Increased mortality in lower SES groups may be due to pre-dialysis factors and other variables such as health-related behaviours, lifestyle and literacy.

Impact of supplemental private health insurance on dialysis and outcomes

BACKGROUND

The influence of health insurance systems on the treatment of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients ispoorly understood.

AIM

We investigated how supplemental private health insurance (PHI) coverage impacted ESKD treatment modalitiesand patient outcomes. The influence of health insurance systems on the treatment of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients is poorly understood. We investigated how supplemental private health insurance (PHI) coverage impacted ESKD treatment modalities and patient outcomes.

METHODS

All adult patients commencing ESKD treatment in New South Wales, Australia from 2000 to 2010 were identified using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry. Data were linked to the state hospitalisation dataset to obtain insurance status, allowing the comparisons of mortality, ESKD treatment modality and health service utilisation between privately insured and public patients.

RESULTS

The cohort of 5737 patients included 38% (n = 2152) with PHI. At 1 year after ESKD treatment initiation, PHI patients had lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.95, P = 0.01), were more likely to be receiving home haemodialysis (HD) (odds ratio (OR) 1.38, 95% CI 1.01-1.89, P = 0.04), to have been transplanted (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.25-2.46, P = 0.001) and used fewer hospital days (incidence rate ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.96, P = 0.01). After adjustment, PHI patients were more likely to initiate ESKD treatment with facility-based HD (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.46, P = 0.03) but were less likely to be started on peritoneal dialysis (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.98, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that supplemental PHI in Australia is associated with lower-risk ESKD treatment attributes and improved health outcomes. A greater understanding of the treatment pathways that deliver these outcomes may inform treatment for the broader ESKD treatment population.

Health-related quality of life in peritoneal dialysis patients: A narrative review

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important aspect of patients´ health that should be an integral part of the evaluation of patient-centered outcomes, not least because HRQOL associates with patients´ morbidity and mortality. This applies also to chronic kidney disease patients, including those dependent on renal replacement therapies, the type of which may influence patients´ perception of HRQOL. Several studies have addressed HRQOL in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing renal replacement therapies, especially transplanted patients and hemodialysis patients, while publications concerning peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are scarcer. This review describes some of the methods used to assess HRQOL, factors influencing HRQOL in PD patients, HRQOL in PD vs hemodialysis, and the relation between HRQOL and patient outcomes. We conclude that assessment of HRQOL-often neglected at present-should be included as a standard measure of patient-centered outcomes and when monitoring the quality and effectiveness of renal care including PD treatment.

Low socio-economic status adversely effects dialysis survival in Australia

AIM

Low socio-economic status (SES) is associated with increased incidence of end-stage kidney disease and in the USA, poorer dialysis survival. All Australians have access to a universal healthcare system.

METHODS

The study included all non-indigenous adult Australians registered with the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry who commenced dialysis between 2003 and 2013. SES at dialysis start was classified into quartiles of advantaged through to disadvantaged using Australian Bureau of Statistics socio-economic indexes for areas. The primary outcome was survival assessed using a competing risk regression model with renal transplantation as a competing risk. There was a significant interaction between age and SES, and hence, age-stratified survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total 20 810 commenced dialysis during the study period. Mortality for the most advantaged quartile was 102.4/1000 person-years (95% confidence interval (CI) 98.0-106.9) compared with 110.7/1000 person-years (95% CI 105.8-115.7) in the disadvantaged quartile. In adjusted analysis, dialysis survival, compared with quartile 1 (advantaged), was inferior in quartile 3 (sub-hazard ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.17) and the disadvantaged quartile (sub-hazard ratio 1.09, 85% CI 1.02-1.16) and was significantly modified by age. This disparity in survival outcome between the different SES quartiles was only observed in younger patients but was attenuated in the older ones following an age-stratified analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In Australia, low SES has an adverse effect on dialysis patient survival despite universal healthcare. This effect is mainly among younger patients where SES may have a greater proportional impact than co-morbidities.

Racial and social disparities in the access to automated peritoneal dialysis - results of a national PD cohort

The prevalence of patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is increasing worldwide and may be guided by clinical characteristics, financial issues and patient option. Whether socioeconomic factors at the patient level may influence the decision for the initial peritoneal dialysis (PD) modality is unknown. This is a prospective cohort study. The primary outcome of interest was the probability to start PD on APD. The inclusion criteria were adult patients incident in PD. Exclusion criteria were missing data for either race or initial PD modality. We used a mixed-model analysis clustering patients according to their PD center and region of the country. We included 3,901 patients of which 1,819 (46.6%) had APD as their first modality. We found a significant disparity for race and educational level with African American patients less likely to start on APD (Odds ratio 0.74 CI95% 0.58-0.94) compared to Whites whilst those with greater educational levels were more likely to start on APD (Odds ratio 3.70, CI95% 2.25-6.09) compared to illiterate patients. Limiting the use of APD in disadvantaged population may be unethical. Demographics and socioeconomic status should not be necessarily part of the decision-making process of PD modality choice.

Effect of center practices on the choice of the first dialysis modality for children and young adults

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) remains the modality of choice in children, but there is no clear evidence to support a better outcome in children treated with PD. We aimed to assess factors that have an impact on the choice of dialysis modality in children and young adults in France and sought to determine the roles of medical factors and center practices.

METHODS

We included all patients aged <20 years at the start of renal replacement therapy (RRT), recorded in the French RRT Registry between 2002 and 2013. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to study the association between the patient/center characteristics and the probability of receiving PD as the first dialysis modality.

RESULTS

We included 806 patients starting RRT in 177 centers, 23 of which were specialized pediatric centers. Six hundred and one patients (74.6 %) started with hemodialysis (HD), whereas 205 (25.4 %) started with PD. A greater probability of PD was found in younger children, whereas starting the treatment in an emergency setting was associated with a low use of PD. We found a significant variability among centers that accounted for 43 % of the total variability. The probability of PD was higher in adult centers and was proportional to the rate of PD in the center.

CONCLUSIONS

Center practices are a major factor in the choice of dialysis modality. This raises concerns about patient and family choices and to what extent doctors may influence the final decision. Further pediatric studies focusing on children's and parents' wishes are needed to provide care as close as possible to patients' and families' expectations.

Residential Location and Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Indigenous Compared With Nonindigenous Australians

BACKGROUND

Indigenous Australians experience significantly worse graft and patient outcomes after kidney transplantation compared with nonindigenous Australians. It is unclear whether rural versus urban residential location might contribute to this.

METHODS

All adult patients from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry who received a kidney transplant in Australia between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012, were investigated. Patients' residential location was classified as urban (major city + inner regional) or rural (outer regional - very remote) using the Australian Bureau of Statistics Remoteness Area Classification.

RESULTS

Of 7826 kidney transplant recipients, 271 (3%) were indigenous. Sixty-three percent of indigenous Australians lived in rural locations compared with 10% of nonindigenous Australians (P < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, the hazards ratio for graft loss for Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous race was 1.59 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.01-2.50; P = 0.046). Residential location was not associated with graft survival. Both indigenous race and residential location influenced patient survival, with an adjusted hazards ratio for death of 1.94 (95% CI, 1.23-3.05; P = 0.004) comparing indigenous with nonindigenous and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.01-1.58; P = 0.043) comparing rural with urban recipients. Five-year graft and patient survivals were 70% (95% CI, 60%-78%) and 69% (95% CI, 61%-76%) in rural indigenous recipients compared with 91% (95% CI, 90%-92%) and 92% (95% CI, 91%-93%) in urban nonindigenous recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Indigenous kidney transplant recipients experience worse patient and graft survival compared with nonindigenous recipients, whereas rural residential location is associated with patient but not graft survival. Of all groups, indigenous recipients residing in rural locations experienced the lowest 5-year graft and patient survivals.

Home Dialysis Utilization Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities in the United States at the National, Regional, and State Level

♦ BACKGROUND: United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data from 2014 show that African Americans (AA) are underrepresented in the home dialysis population, with 6.4% versus 9.2% utilization in the general populace. This racial disparity may be inaccurately ascribed to the nation as a whole if regional and inter-state variability exists. This investigation sought to examine home dialysis utilization by minority Medicare beneficiary populations across the US nationally, regionally, and by individual state. ♦ METHODS: The 2012 Medicare 100% Outpatient Standard Analytic File was used to identify all Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) patients, with state of residence and race, receiving an outpatient dialysis facility bill type. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD) patients were identified using revenue and condition codes and were defined by having at least one claim during the year that met criteria for the category. Beneficiaries were counted once for each modality used that year. A home dialysis utilization ratio (UR) was calculated as the ratio of the proportion of a minority on PD or HHD within a geographic division to the proportion of Caucasians on PD or HHD within the same geographic division. A UR less than 1.00 indicated under-representation while a UR over 1.00 indicated over-representation. Utilization ratios were compared using a Poisson regression model. ♦ RESULTS: A total of 369,164 Medicare FFS dialysis patients were identified. Within the total cohort, AA were the most underrepresented minority on PD (UR 0.586; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.585 - 0.586; p < 0.0001), followed by Hispanics (UR 0.744; 95% CI 0.743 - 0.744; p < 0.0001). The underutilization of PD by AA and Hispanics could not be ascribed to any region of the US, as all regions of the US had UR < 1.00. Only Massachusetts had a UR > 1.00 for AA on PD. Peritoneal dialysis UR values for Asians and those self-identified as Other were 0.954; 95% CI 0.953 - 0.954 and 0.932; 95% CI 0.931 - 0.932, respectively. Nationally, all minorities utilized HHD less than Caucasians. However, more variability existed, with Asians utilizing more HHD than Caucasians in the Midwest. ♦ CONCLUSIONS: Although regional and interstate variability exists, there is near universal under-representation of AA and Hispanics in the home dialysis population, while Asians and Other demonstrate more interregional and interstate variability.

Peritoneal ultrafiltration for refractory fluid overload and ascites due to pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension is a common finding in patients with advanced liver disease. Similarly, among patients with advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension, right heart failure leads to congestive hepatopathy. Diuretic resistant fluid overload in both advanced pulmonary hypertension and chronic liver disease is a demanding challenge for physicians. Venous congestion and ascites-induced increased intra-abdominal pressure are essential regarding recurrent hospitalization, morbidity and mortality. Due to impaired right-ventricular function, many patients cannot tolerate extracorporeal ultrafiltration. Peritoneal dialysis, a well-established, hemodynamically tolerated treatment for outpatients may be a good alternative to control fluid status. We present a patient with pulmonary arterial hypertension and congestive hepatopathy hospitalized for over 3 months due to ascites induced refractory volume overload treated with peritoneal ultrafiltration. We report the treatment benefits on fluid balance, cardiorenal and pulmonary function, as well as its safety. In conclusion, we report a case in which peritoneal ultrafiltration was an efficient treatment option for refractory ascites in patients with congestive hepatopathy.

Peritoneal dialysis use within the context of the population and healthcare systems of Europe - differences, trends and future challenges

INTRODUCTION

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and haemodialysis (HD) are complementary therapies in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Despite survival benefit, PD remains an underused therapy with variable utilisation and a common descriptive framework for this variation is not established. We reviewed the renal literature, general population and healthcare data to examine factors leading to variable PD use in Europe and possible changes in the future.

METHODS

ERA-EDTA data were used to examine PD distribution in Europe. Statistics and descriptive data about population structure and living conditions published by Eurostat, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Observatory were examined. Published literature (Pubmed), health system data (formal internet search approach) and professional body data (internet and personal communication) were examined to describe the factors that may explain PD variation.

RESULTS

PD usage varies across Europe and analysis of contributing factors enabled the development of a descriptive framework. PD variation cannot be entirely explained by the reimbursement system. It appears that factors specific to countries and centres as well as personalised ones involving patient-physician interaction are the most influential. The current and projected European population demographics and living conditions will lead to more elderly patients who live alone being on dialysis.

DISCUSSION

Factors relating to the patient-physician interaction are prime determinants around the utilization of PD. Population demographic change will lead to additional challenges to renal services. The descriptive framework postulated should be considered in strategic dialysis service planning and future product design to meet the needs of future dialysis patients and deliver patient choice.

Rural Versus Urban Health Service Utilization and Outcomes for Renal Patients in New South Wales: Protocol for a Data Linkage Study

BACKGROUND

Kidney disease is a significant burden on health systems globally, with the rising prevalence of end stage kidney disease in Australia mirrored in many other countries. Approximately 25% of the Australian population lives in regional and rural areas and accessing complex tertiary services is challenging.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to compare the burden and outcomes of chronic kidney disease and end stage kidney disease in rural and urban regions of New South Wales (Australia's most populous state) using linked health data.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study and we have defined two cohorts: one with end stage kidney disease and one with chronic kidney disease. The end stage kidney disease cohort was defined using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, identifying all patients living in NSW receiving renal replacement therapy at any time between 01/07/2000 and 31/07/2010. The chronic kidney disease cohort used the NSW Admitted Patient Data Collection (APDC) to identify patients with a diagnostic code relating to chronic renal failure during any admission between 01/07/2000 and 31/07/2010. Both cohorts were linked to the NSW APDC, the Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages, and the Central Cancer Registry allowing derivation of outcomes by categories of geographical remoteness.

RESULTS

To date, we have identified 10,505 patients with 2,384,218 records in the end stage kidney disease cohort and 159,033 patients with 1,599,770 records in the chronic kidney disease cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will define the geographical distribution of end stage and chronic kidney disease and compare the health service utilization between rural and urban renal populations.

Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry

The ANZDATA Registry includes all patients treated with renal replacement therapy (RRT) throughout Australia and New Zealand. Funding is predominantly from government sources, together with the non-government organization Kidney Health Australia. Registry operations are overseen by an Executive committee, and a Steering Committee with wide representation. Data is collected from renal units throughout Australia and New Zealand on a regular basis, and forwarded to the Registry. Areas covered include demographic details, primary renal disease, type of renal replacement therapy, process measures, and a variety of outcomes. From this data collection a number of themes of work are produced. These include production of Registry reports with an extensive range of national and regional data, a suite of quality assurance reports, key process indicator (KPI) reports, and data sets for a variety of audit and research purposes. The various types of information from the ANZDATA Registry are used in a wide variety of areas, including health services planning, safety and quality programs, and clinical research projects.

Association between medical insurance type and survival in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis

Background

Socioeconomic characteristics may affect the outcomes of patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD). There are two major medical insurances in China: the New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS), mainly for rural residents, and the Urban Employees’ Medical Insurance (UEMI). The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of medical insurance type on survival of patient undergoing PD.

Method

This was a prospective study in adult patients who underwent PD at the Wuhan No.1 Hospital between January 2008 and December 2013. Patients had received continuous ambulatory PD for >3 months. Patients were divided according to their medical insurance. Demographic and socioeconomic data, biochemical parameters and primary clinical outcomes including all-cause mortality, switch to hemodialysis and kidney transplantation were analyzed.

Result

There were 415 patients with UEMI and 149 with NCMS. Compared with UEMI, patients with NCMS were younger, and had shorter dialysis duration, smaller proportion of diabetic nephropathy, more severe anemia, and more frequent hyperphosphatemia and hyperuricemia. Total Kt/V, creatinine clearance and residual renal function were not different. There was no difference in technique survival (P > 0.05) between the two groups, but rural patients showed lower overall survival (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that NCMS was independently associated with lower survival (RR = 1.49; 95% CI = 1.04-2.15).

Conclusions

Medical insurance model is independently associated with PD patient survival.