1
|
Choi SJ, Kim ES. Optimizing Treatment for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Complex Infections: A Review of Current Evidence. Infect Chemother 2024; 56:171-187. [PMID: 38960737 PMCID: PMC11224036 DOI: 10.3947/ic.2024.0055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex (CRAB) poses a significant global health challenge owing to its resistance to multiple antibiotics and limited treatment options. Polymyxin-based therapies have been widely used to treat CRAB infections; however, they are associated with high mortality rates and common adverse events such as nephrotoxicity. Recent developments include numerous observational studies and randomized clinical trials investigating antibiotic combinations, repurposing existing antibiotics, and the development of novel agents. Consequently, recommendations for treating CRAB are undergoing significant changes. The importance of colistin is decreasing, and the role of sulbactam, which exhibits direct antibacterial activity against A. baumannii complex, is being reassessed. High-dose ampicillin-sulbactam-based combination therapies, as well as combinations of sulbactam and durlobactam, which prevent the hydrolysis of sulbactam and binds to penicillin-binding protein 2, have shown promising results. This review introduces recent advancements in CRAB infection treatment based on clinical trial data, highlighting the need for optimized treatment protocols and comprehensive clinical trials to combat the evolving threat of CRAB effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seong Jin Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Eu Suk Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Franzone JP, Mackow N, van Duin D. Current treatment options for pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2024; 37:137-143. [PMID: 38179988 PMCID: PMC10922681 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000001001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to briefly summarize the challenges associated with the treatment of pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), discuss its carbapenem-resistance, and review the literature supporting the current treatment paradigm and therapeutic options. RECENT FINDINGS In a multicenter, randomized, and controlled trial the novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam-durlobactam was compared to colistin, both in addition to imipenem-cilastatin. The drug met the prespecified criteria for noninferiority for 28-day all-cause mortality while demonstrating higher clinical cure rates in the treatment of CRAB pneumonia. In an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial colistin monotherapy was compared to colistin combined with meropenem. In this trial, combination therapy was not superior to monotherapy in the treatment of drug-resistant gram-negative organisms including CRAB pneumonia. SUMMARY CRAB pneumonia is a preeminent public health threat without an agreed upon first line treatment strategy. Historically, there have been drawbacks to available treatment modalities without a clear consensus on the first-line treatment regimen. CRAB pneumonia is a top priority for the continued development of antimicrobials, adjuvant therapies and refinement of current treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P. Franzone
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Natalie Mackow
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - David van Duin
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rafailidis P, Panagopoulos P, Koutserimpas C, Samonis G. Current Therapeutic Approaches for Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:261. [PMID: 38534696 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13030261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections remains a challenge for physicians worldwide in the 21st century. The bacterium possesses a multitude of mechanisms to escape the human immune system. The consequences of A. baumannii infections on morbidity and mortality, as well on financial resources, remain dire. Furthermore, A. baumannii superinfections have also occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. While prevention is important, the antibiotic armamentarium remains the most essential factor for the treatment of these infections. The main problem is the notorious resistance profile (including resistance to carbapenems and colistin) that this bacterium exhibits. While newer beta lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors have entered clinical practice, with excellent results against various infections due to Enterobacteriaceae, their contribution against A. baumannii infections is almost absent. Hence, we have to resort to at least one of the following, sulbactam, polymyxins E or B, tigecycline or aminoglycosides, against multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) A. baumannii infections. Furthermore, the notable addition of cefiderocol in the fight against A. baumannii infections represents a useful addition. We present herein the existing information from the last decade regarding therapeutic advances against MDR/XDR A. baumannii infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petros Rafailidis
- Second University Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Periklis Panagopoulos
- Second University Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Christos Koutserimpas
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, "251" Hellenic Air Force General Hospital of Athens, 115 25 Athens, Greece
| | - George Samonis
- Department of Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, 185 47 Athens, Greece
- Department of Medicine, University of Crete, 715 00 Heraklion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bassetti M, Vena A, Giacobbe DR. Management of nonfermenting gram-negative infections: a critique of the guidelines. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2023; 36:609-614. [PMID: 37769165 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In the present narrative review, we discuss the characteristics and differences between the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guidelines in terms on their recommendations/suggestions for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii infections. RECENT FINDINGS Treatment of severe infections caused by nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB) is posing both novel hopes and novel challenges to physicians worldwide, and both the IDSA and the ESCMID have recently updated/released their guidelines or guidance documents, based on different philosophies and providing recommendations for the treatment of NF-GNB infections. In order to correctly exploit recent advances in the treatment of such infections, IDSA and ESCMID approaches should be viewed as complementary and evolving, and should not preclude further revision based on accumulating evidence on the use of novel β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. SUMMARY A joint consideration of both philosophies should leave the door opened for the wise use of novel agents, ultimately building precious experience on their use that could favorably influence future guidelines revisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Bassetti
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy
| | - Antonio Vena
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy
| | - Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zeng M, Xia J, Zong Z, Shi Y, Ni Y, Hu F, Chen Y, Zhuo C, Hu B, Lv X, Li J, Liu Z, Zhang J, Yang W, Yang F, Yang Q, Zhou H, Li X, Wang J, Li Y, Ren J, Chen B, Chen D, Wu A, Guan X, Qu J, Wu D, Huang X, Qiu H, Xu Y, Yu Y, Wang M. Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, IMMUNOLOGY, AND INFECTION = WEI MIAN YU GAN RAN ZA ZHI 2023; 56:653-671. [PMID: 36868960 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2023.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
The dissemination of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CRGNB) is a global public health issue. CRGNB isolates are usually extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant, resulting in limited antimicrobial treatment options and high mortality. A multidisciplinary guideline development group covering clinical infectious diseases, clinical microbiology, clinical pharmacology, infection control, and guideline methodology experts jointly developed the present clinical practice guidelines based on best available scientific evidence to address the clinical issues regarding laboratory testing, antimicrobial therapy, and prevention of CRGNB infections. This guideline focuses on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). Sixteen clinical questions were proposed from the perspective of current clinical practice and translated into research questions using PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes) format to collect and synthesize relevant evidence to inform corresponding recommendations. The grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence, benefit and risk profile of corresponding interventions and formulate recommendations or suggestions. Evidence extracted from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was considered preferentially for treatment-related clinical questions. Observational studies, non-controlled studies, and expert opinions were considered as supplementary evidence in the absence of RCTs. The strength of recommendations was classified as strong or conditional (weak). The evidence informing recommendations derives from studies worldwide, while the implementation suggestions combined the Chinese experience. The target audience of this guideline is clinician and related professionals involved in management of infectious diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Zeng
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jun Xia
- The Nottingham Ningbo GRADE Centre, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, China; Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Zhiyong Zong
- Center of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yi Shi
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, China
| | - Yuxing Ni
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Fupin Hu
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, And Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of People's Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Yijian Chen
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, And Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of People's Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Chao Zhuo
- Department of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
| | - Bijie Hu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xiaoju Lv
- Center of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Jiabin Li
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui 230022, China
| | - Zhengyin Liu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, And Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of People's Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Wenjie Yang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
| | - Fan Yang
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, And Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of People's Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Qiwen Yang
- Department and State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Zhou
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Pharmacy, The Third Hospital of Changsha, Changsha 410015, China
| | - Jianhua Wang
- Pharmaceutical Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China
| | - Yimin Li
- Department of Critical Care Medicine,State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
| | - Jian'an Ren
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, China
| | - Baiyi Chen
- Divison of Infectious Diseases, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
| | - Dechang Chen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200020, China
| | - Anhua Wu
- Infection Control Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Xiangdong Guan
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Jieming Qu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200020, China
| | - Depei Wu
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
| | - Xiaojun Huang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Haibo Qiu
- Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Yingchun Xu
- Department and State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Yunsong Yu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, China.
| | - Minggui Wang
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, And Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of People's Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Momenzadeh M, Soltani R, Shafiee F, Hakamifard A, Pourahmad M, Abbasi S. The effectiveness of colistin/levofloxacin compared to colistin/meropenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Res Pharm Sci 2022; 18:39-48. [PMID: 36846731 PMCID: PMC9951781 DOI: 10.4103/1735-5362.363594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is still a great challenge. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the colistin/levofloxacin regimen compared to the usual colistin/meropenem regimen in the treatment of patients with VAP caused by CRAB. Experimental approach The patients with VAP were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 26) and control (n = 29) groups. The first group received IV colistin 4.5 MIU every 12 h + levofloxacin 750 mg IV daily, and the second group received IV colistin with the same dose + meropenem 1 g IV every 8 h for 10 days. The clinical (complete response, partial response, or treatment failure) and microbiological responses at the end of the intervention were recorded and compared between the two groups. Findings/Results The complete response rate was higher (n = 7; 35%) and the failure rate was lower (n = 4; 20%) in the experimental group than in the control group (n = 2; 8%, and n = 11; 44%, respectively), but the differences were not statistically significant. Even though the microbiological response rate was higher in the experimental group (n = 14; 70%) than in the control group (n = 12; 48%), the difference was not statistically significant. The mortality rate was 6 (23.10%) and 4 patients (13.8%) in the experimental and control groups, respectively (P = 0.490). Conclusion and implication The levofloxacin/colistin combination can be considered an alternative regimen to meropenem/colistin in the treatment of VAP caused by CRAB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahnaz Momenzadeh
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran
| | - Rasool Soltani
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran,Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran,Corresponding author: R. Soltani Tel: +98-3137927067, Fax: +98-3136680011
| | - Fatemeh Shafiee
- Deparment of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran
| | - Atousa Hakamifard
- Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran,Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I.R. Iran
| | - Morteza Pourahmad
- Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran
| | - Saeed Abbasi
- Anaesthesiology Department, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang JL, Xiang BX, Song XL, Que RM, Zuo XC, Xie YL. Prevalence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity and its predictors in critically ill adult patients: A meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:11466-11485. [PMID: 36387815 PMCID: PMC9649555 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity is a major safety concern in clinical practice due to long-term adverse outcomes and high mortality.
AIM To conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and potential predictors of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.
METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Reference Citation Analysis database were searched for relevant studies from inception through May 30, 2022. The pooled prevalence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity and pooled risk ratios of associated factors were analysed using a random-effects or fixed-effects model by Stata SE ver. 12.1. Additionally, subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to assess heterogeneity.
RESULTS A total of 89 studies involving 12234 critically ill adult patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled incidence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity was 34.8%. The pooled prevalence of colistin-induced nephrotoxicity was not higher than that of polymyxin B (PMB)-induced nephrotoxicity. The subgroup analyses showed that nephrotoxicity was significantly associated with dosing interval, nephrotoxicity criteria, age, publication year, study quality and sample size, which were confirmed in the univariable meta-regression analysis. Nephrotoxicity was significantly increased when the total daily dose was divided into 2 doses but not 3 or 4 doses. Furthermore, older age, the presence of sepsis or septic shock, hypoalbuminemia, and concomitant vancomycin or vasopressor use were independent risk factors for polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity, while an elevated baseline glomerular filtration rate was a protective factor against colistin-induced nephrotoxicity.
CONCLUSION Our findings indicated that the incidence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity among ICU patients was high. It emphasizes the importance of additional efforts to manage ICU patients receiving polymyxins to decrease the risk of adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiang-Lin Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, Hunan Province, China
| | - Bi-Xiao Xiang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, Hunan Province, China
| | - Xiao-Li Song
- Department of Pharmacy, Sanya Central Hospital, Sanya 572000, Hainan Province, China
| | - Rui-Man Que
- Department of Pharmacy, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, Hunan Province, China
| | - Xiao-Cong Zuo
- Department of Pharmacy, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, Hunan Province, China
| | - Yue-Liang Xie
- Department of Pharmacy, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, Hunan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reply to Epling and Powers, "Cefiderocol and the Need for Higher-Quality Evidence: Methods Matter for Patients". Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2022; 66:e0079522. [PMID: 35867525 PMCID: PMC9380543 DOI: 10.1128/aac.00795-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
|
9
|
Giacobbe DR, Roberts JA, Abdul-Aziz MH, de Montmollin E, Timsit JF, Bassetti M. Treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria with novel agents: a contemporary, multidisciplinary ESGCIP perspective. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2022; 20:963-979. [PMID: 35385681 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2063838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION : In the past 15 years, treatment of VAP caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) has represented an intricate challenge for clinicians. AREAS COVERED In this perspective article, we discuss the available clinical data about novel agents for the treatment of CR-GNB VAP, together with general PK/PD principles for the treatment of VAP, in the attempt to provide some suggestions for optimizing antimicrobial therapy of CR-GNB VAP in the daily clinical practice. EXPERT OPINION Recently, novel BL and BL/BLI combinations have become available that have shown potent in vitro activity against CR-GNB and have attracted much interest as novel, less toxic, and possibly more efficacious options for the treatment of CR-GNB VAP compared with previous standard of care. Besides randomized controlled trials, a good solution to enrich our knowledge on how to use these novel agents at best in the near future, while at the same time remaining adherent to current evidence-based guidelines, is to improve our collaboration to conduct larger multinational observational studies to collect sufficiently large populations treated in real life with those novel agents for which guidelines currently do not provide a recommendation (in favor or against) for certain causative organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
- Infectious Diseases Unit, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Critically ill patients study group (ESGCIP) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID)
| | - Jason A Roberts
- Critically ill patients study group (ESGCIP) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID).,University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Herston Infectious Diseases Institute (HeIDI), Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia.,Departments of Pharmacy and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Division of Anaesthesiology Critical Care Emergency and Pain Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Nîmes France
| | - Mohd H Abdul-Aziz
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Etienne de Montmollin
- Medical and Infectious Diseases Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP, Bichat Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France.,INSERM IAME UMR 1137, University of Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Paris, France
| | - Jean-François Timsit
- Critically ill patients study group (ESGCIP) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID).,Medical and Infectious Diseases Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP, Bichat Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France.,INSERM IAME UMR 1137, University of Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Paris, France
| | - Matteo Bassetti
- Infectious Diseases Unit, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Critically ill patients study group (ESGCIP) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Paul M, Carrara E, Retamar P, Tängdén T, Bitterman R, Bonomo RA, de Waele J, Daikos GL, Akova M, Harbarth S, Pulcini C, Garnacho-Montero J, Seme K, Tumbarello M, Lindemann PC, Gandra S, Yu Y, Bassetti M, Mouton JW, Tacconelli E, Baño JR. European Society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases (ESCMID) guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (endorsed by ESICM -European Society of intensive care Medicine). Clin Microbiol Infect 2021; 28:521-547. [PMID: 34923128 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 336] [Impact Index Per Article: 112.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Revised: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
SCOPE These ESCMID guidelines address the targeted antibiotic treatment of 3rd generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCephRE) and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, focusing on the effectiveness of individual antibiotics and on combination vs. monotherapy. METHODS An expert panel was convened by ESCMID. A systematic review was performed including randomized controlled trials and observational studies, examining different antibiotic treatment regimens for the targeted treatment of infections caused by the 3GCephRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanni (CRAB). Treatments were classified as head-to-head comparisons between individual antibiotics and monotherapy vs. combination therapy regimens, including defined monotherapy and combination regimens only. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, preferably at 30 days and secondary outcomes included clinical failure, microbiological failure, development of resistance, relapse/recurrence, adverse events and length of hospital stay. The last search of all databases was conducted in December 2019, followed by a focused search for relevant studies up until ECCMID 2021. Data were summarized narratively. The certainty of the evidence for each comparison between antibiotics and between monotherapy vs. combination therapy regimens was classified by the GRADE recommendations. The strength of the recommendations for or against treatments was classified as strong or conditional (weak). RECOMMENDATIONS The guideline panel reviewed the evidence per pathogen, preferably per site of infection, critically appraising the existing studies. Many of the comparisons were addressed in small observational studies at high risk of bias only. Notably, there was very little evidence on the effects of the new, recently approved, beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitors on infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Most recommendations are based on very-low and low certainty evidence. A high value was placed on antibiotic stewardship considerations in all recommendations, searching for carbapenem-sparing options for 3GCephRE and limiting the recommendations of the new antibiotics for severe infections, as defined by the sepsis-3 criteria. Research needs are addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mical Paul
- Infectious Diseases Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Elena Carrara
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Pilar Retamar
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain; Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/ Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Seville, Spain
| | - Thomas Tängdén
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Roni Bitterman
- Infectious Diseases Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Robert A Bonomo
- Department of Medicine, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Biochemistry, Proteomics and Bioinformatics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA; Medical Service, Research Service, and GRECC, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA;; VAMC Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Epidemiology, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jan de Waele
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - George L Daikos
- First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
| | - Murat Akova
- Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department Of Infectious Diseases, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Stephan Harbarth
- Infection Control Programme, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Celine Pulcini
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Infectious Diseases Department, Nancy, France
| | | | - Katja Seme
- Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Mario Tumbarello
- Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Italy
| | | | - Sumanth Gandra
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Yunsong Yu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology and Bioinformatics of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China; Regional Medical Center for National Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Matteo Bassetti
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; Clinica Malattie Infettive, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Johan W Mouton
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelina Tacconelli
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine I, German Center for Infection Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Clinical Research Unit for Healthcare Associated Infections, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Jesus Rodriguez Baño
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain; Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/ Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kumar S, Anwer R, Azzi A. Virulence Potential and Treatment Options of Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii. Microorganisms 2021; 9:microorganisms9102104. [PMID: 34683425 PMCID: PMC8541637 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9102104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Acinetobacter baumannii is an opportunistic pathogen which is undoubtedly known for a high rate of morbidity and mortality in hospital-acquired infections. A. baumannii causes life-threatening infections, including; ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), meningitis, bacteremia, and wound and urinary tract infections (UTI). In 2017, the World Health Organization listed A. baumannii as a priority-1 pathogen. The prevalence of A. baumannii infections and outbreaks emphasizes the direct need for the use of effective therapeutic agents for treating such infections. Available antimicrobials, such as; carbapenems, tigecycline, and colistins have insufficient effectiveness due to the appearance of multidrug-resistant strains, accentuating the need for alternative and novel therapeutic remedies. To understand and overcome this menace, the knowledge of recent discoveries on the virulence factors of A. baumannii is needed. Herein, we summarized the role of various virulence factors, including; outer membrane proteins, efflux pumps, biofilm, penicillin-binding proteins, and siderophores/iron acquisition systems. We reviewed the recent scientific literature on different A. baumannii virulence factors and the effective antimicrobial agents for the treatment and management of bacterial infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil Kumar
- Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to Be University), Mullana, Ambala 133207, India;
| | - Razique Anwer
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 13317-4233, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Arezki Azzi
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 13317-4233, Saudi Arabia
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
O'Donnell JN, Putra V, Lodise TP. Treatment of patients with serious infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: How viable are the current options? Pharmacotherapy 2021; 41:762-780. [PMID: 34170571 DOI: 10.1002/phar.2607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
This review critically appraises the published microbiologic and clinical data on the treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Despite being recognized as an urgent threat pathogen by the CDC and WHO, optimal treatment of patients with serious CRAB infections remains ill-defined. Few commercially available agents exhibit reliable in vitro activity against CRAB. Historically, polymyxins have been the most active agents in vitro, though interpretations of susceptibility data are difficult given issues surrounding MIC testing methodologies and lack of correlation between MICs and clinical outcomes. Most available preclinical and clinical data involve use of polymyxins, tetracyclines, and sulbactam, alone and in combination. As the number of viable treatment options is limited, combination therapy with a polymyxin is often used for patients with CRAB infections, despite the significant risk of nephrotoxicity. However, no treatment regimen has been found to reduce mortality, which exceeds 40% across most studies, or substantially improve clinical response. While some newer agents, such as eravacycline and cefiderocol, have demonstrated in vitro activity, clinical efficacy has not been fully established. New agents with clinically relevant activity against CRAB isolates and favorable toxicity profiles are sorely needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Nicholas O'Donnell
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Vibert Putra
- Department of Basic and Clinical Sciences, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Thomas P Lodise
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Eljaaly K, Bidell MR, Gandhi RG, Alshehri S, Enani MA, Al-Jedai A, Lee TC. Colistin Nephrotoxicity: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8:ofab026. [PMID: 33623807 PMCID: PMC7888569 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nephrotoxicity is a known adverse effect of polymyxin antibiotics, including colistin. Although previous meta-analyses have aimed to characterize colistin-associated nephrotoxicity risk relative to other antibiotics, included studies were observational in nature with high risk of confounding and heterogeneity. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of exclusively randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the incidence of nephrotoxicity associated with colistin versus minimally nephrotoxic antibiotics. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and 3 trial registries for RCTs comparing the nephrotoxicity of colistin to nonpolymyxin antibiotics. Randomized controlled trials that used aminoglycosides were excluded. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. The study outcome was the rate of nephrotoxicity. Results Five RCTs with a total of 377 patients were included. Most patients received colistin for pneumonia in the intensive care unit, and the comparators were β-lactam-based regimens. Colistimethate sodium was dosed at 9 million units/day (300 mg/day of colistin base activity), with administration of a loading dose in 4 studies. The nephrotoxicity incidence in patients who received colistin was 36.2% (95% CI, 23.3% to 51.3%). The nephrotoxicity rate was significantly higher in the colistin arm than comparators (RR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.47 to 3.91; P ≤ .001; I2 = 0%), and the number needed to harm was 5. Findings persisted upon one-study-removed-analysis. Conclusions This meta-analysis of RCTs found a colistin-associated nephrotoxicity rate of 36.2% and an increase in this risk compared with β-lactam-based regimens by 140%. Colistin should be regarded as a last-line agent and safer alternatives should be considered when possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid Eljaaly
- Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.,College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Ronak G Gandhi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Samah Alshehri
- Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.,College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Mushira A Enani
- Infectious Diseases Section, Medical Specialties Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Al-Jedai
- Deputyship of Therapeutic Affairs, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Todd C Lee
- Clinical Practice Assessment Unit, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wagenlehner F, Lucenteforte E, Pea F, Soriano A, Tavoschi L, Steele VR, Henriksen AS, Longshaw C, Manissero D, Pecini R, Pogue JM. Systematic review on estimated rates of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity in patients treated with polymyxins. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021; 27:S1198-743X(20)30764-3. [PMID: 33359542 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity are commonly associated with polymyxin treatment; however, the emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria with limited therapeutic options has resulted in increased use of polymyxins. OBJECTIVES To determine the rates of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity during polymyxin treatment and whether any factors influence these. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched on 2 January 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Studies reporting nephrotoxicity and/or neurotoxicity rates in patients with infections treated with polymyxins were included. Reviews, meta-analyses and reports not in English were excluded. PARTICIPANTS Patients hospitalized with infections treated with systemic or inhaled polymyxins were included. For comparative analyses, patients treated with non-polymyxin-based regimens were also included. METHODS Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model; subgroup meta-analyses were conducted where data permitted using a mixed-effects model. RESULTS In total, 237 reports of randomized controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies were eligible for inclusion; most were single-arm observational studies. Nephrotoxic events in 35,569 patients receiving polymyxins were analysed. Overall nephrotoxicity rate was 0.282 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.259-0.307). When excluding studies where >50% of patients received inhaled-only polymyxin treatment or nephrotoxicity assessment was by methods other than internationally recognized criteria (RIFLE, KDIGO or AKIN), the nephrotoxicity rate was 0.391 (95% CI 0.364-0.419). The odds of nephrotoxicity were greater with polymyxin therapies compared to non-polymyxin-based regimens (odds ratio 2.23 (95% CI 1.58-3.15); p < 0.001). Meta-analyses showed a significant effect of polymyxin type, dose, patient age, number of concomitant nephrotoxins and use of diuretics, glycopeptides or vasopressors on the rate of nephrotoxicity. Polymyxin therapies were not associated with a significantly different rate of neurotoxicity than non-polymyxin-based regimens (p 0.051). The overall rate of neurotoxicity during polymyxin therapy was 0.030 (95% CI 0.020-0.043). CONCLUSIONS Polymyxins are associated with a higher risk of nephrotoxicity than non-polymyxin-based regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Wagenlehner
- Clinic for Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Ersilia Lucenteforte
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Federico Pea
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine and Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, SM Misericordia University Hospital, ASUIUD, Udine, Italy
| | - Alex Soriano
- Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lara Tavoschi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Davide Manissero
- University College of London, Institute for Global Health, London, UK
| | | | - Jason M Pogue
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Karvouniaris M, Pontikis K, Nitsotolis T, Poulakou G. New perspectives in the antibiotic treatment of mechanically ventilated patients with infections from Gram-negatives. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2020; 19:825-844. [PMID: 33270485 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2021.1859369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common and potentially fatal complication of mechanical ventilation that is often caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Despite the repurposing of older treatments and the novel antimicrobials, many resistance mechanisms cannot be confronted, and novel therapies are needed.Areas covered: We searched the literature for keywords regarding the treatment of GNB infections in mechanically ventilated patients. This narrative review presents new data on antibiotics and non-antibiotic approaches focusing on Phase 3 trials against clinically significant GNB that cause VAP.Expert opinion: Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam stand out as new options for infections by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing bacteria, whereas ceftolozane-tazobactam adds therapeutic flexibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections with multiple resistance mechanisms. Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam have relevant literature. Aztreonam-avibactam holds promise for the treatment of infections by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing organisms. Recently approved cefiderocol possesses an extended antibacterial spectrum, including KPC- and MBL-producers. However, recently published data have toned down optimism about treating VAP caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. For the latter, eravacycline may provide additional hope, pending pertinent data. Non-antibiotic treatments currently being considered as adjunct therapeutic approaches are welcome. Nevertheless, they will hopefully substitute current antimicrobials in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marios Karvouniaris
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University, Sotiria General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Pontikis
- ICU First Department of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University, Sotiria General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Thomas Nitsotolis
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University, Sotiria General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Garyphallia Poulakou
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University, Sotiria General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu J, Shu Y, Zhu F, Feng B, Zhang Z, Liu L, Wang G. Comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapy with high-dose sulbactam or colistin with additional antibacterial agents for multiple drug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2020; 24:136-147. [PMID: 32889142 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with high-dose sulbactam or colistin with additional antibacterial agents for treating multidrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB or XDR-AB) infections. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science (through March 30, 2020) for studies that examined high-dose sulbactam or colistin with additional antibacterial agents as therapy for patients with infections with MDR-AB and XDR-AB. Through a network meta-analysis (NMA), using both direct and indirect evidence, we determined risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Primary outcomes included clinical improvement, clinical cure, microbiological eradication, and mortality from any cause. Secondary outcomes included nephrotoxicity. RESULTS The NMA included 18 studies and 1835 patients. We found that high-dose sulbactam (≥6 g per day), combined with another single antibacterial agent (levofloxacin or tigecycline), which were the highest ranking in clinical improvement and clinical cure. Still colistin-based combination in drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii therapy occupied the main position (the number of studies and patients) in most studies. Colistin combined with additional antibacterial agents was associated with a higher risk of nephrotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS Therapeutic regimens including high-dose sulbactam in combination with additional antibacterial agents (including colistin) might be one of the promising options for the treatment of MDR-AB or XDR-AB infections and high-quality study will be needed to confirm clinical efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiating Liu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, 1 Xianglin Road, Luzhou 646000, China; Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 25 Taiping Street, Luzhou 646000, China
| | - Yunfeng Shu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, 1 Xianglin Road, Luzhou 646000, China; Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 25 Taiping Street, Luzhou 646000, China
| | - Feilong Zhu
- The Affiliated Xuzhou Rehabilitation Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221009, China
| | - Bimin Feng
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, 1 Xianglin Road, Luzhou 646000, China
| | - Zhengjie Zhang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, 1 Xianglin Road, Luzhou 646000, China; Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 25 Taiping Street, Luzhou 646000, China
| | - Liang Liu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, 1 Xianglin Road, Luzhou 646000, China; Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 25 Taiping Street, Luzhou 646000, China
| | - Guojun Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 25 Taiping Street, Luzhou 646000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lyu C, Zhang Y, Liu X, Wu J, Zhang J. Clinical efficacy and safety of polymyxins based versus non-polymyxins based therapies in the infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20:296. [PMID: 32316926 PMCID: PMC7175513 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-05026-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The prevalence of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is on the rise worldwide. Polymyxins are considered as last-resort drugs for CRAB infections, but there is still controversy regarding the efficacy and safety of polymyxins based therapies in CRAB infections. The present systematic review was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of polymyxins based therapies versus non-polymyxins based therapies in CRAB infections. Methods We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov to identify eligible studies reporting the clinical outcomes of patients with CRAB infections. The meta-analysis employed a random-effects model to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary outcome was 1-month mortality for any cause. We also examined clinical response, microbiological response, length of stay in hospital, and adverse events. Results Eleven eligible studies were analyzed (1052 patients in total), including 2 randomized clinical trials. Serious risk of bias was found in 8 out of the 11 studies. There was no statistically significant difference between polymyxins based therapies and non-polymyxins based therapies in 1-month mortality for any cause (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.53), microbiological response (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 0.90 to 16.29) and length of stay in hospital (SMD, 0.24; 95% CI, − 0.08 to 0.56). The pooled OR of clinical response indicated a significant difference in favor of polymyxin based therapies (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.31 to 3.03). The pooled OR of adverse events showed that non-polymyxins based therapies were associated with fewer adverse events (OR, 4.32; 95% CI, 1.39 to 13.48). Conclusion The performance of polymyxins based therapies was better than non-polymyxin based therapies in clinical response rate and similar to non-polymyxin based therapies in terms of 1-month mortality and microbiological response in treating CRAB infections. Due to the limitations of our study, we cannot draw a firm conclusion on the optimal treatment of CRAB infections, but polymyxins would be a relatively effective treatment for CRAB infections. Adequate and well-designed large scale randomized controlled trials are required to clarify the relative efficacy of polymyxins based and non-polymyxins based therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Lyu
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Middle Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.,Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuyi Zhang
- Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaofen Liu
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Middle Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.,Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission, Shanghai, China
| | - Jufang Wu
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Middle Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Middle Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, China. .,Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP): an effective implementing technique for the therapy efficiency of meropenem and vancomycin antibiotics in Iranian pediatric patients. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2019; 18:6. [PMID: 30696456 PMCID: PMC6352345 DOI: 10.1186/s12941-019-0305-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) is a distinguished method to improve the prescription and efficacy of antibiotics. Aim The efficacy of ASP and conventional methods was compared to measure the effectiveness of meropenem (MPM) and vancomycin (VMN) antibiotics in pediatric patients. Design In an interventional quasi-experimental study, 135 children admitted in Children’s Hospital affiliated to University of Medical Sciences in time periods of 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 were assessed. Methods The conventional and ASP methods in 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 were respectively utilized to provide the best antimicrobial therapy of MPM and VMN antibiotics in patient children. The data of mortality rate (MR), antibiotic prescription (AP), antibiotic dose (ADe), antibiotic duration (ADn), length of hospital stay (LOHS), and blood cultures (BCs) were compared across the years using the Chi square, independent t test, and Fisher’s exact test. Results The levels of MR, AP, ADe, ADn, LOHS, and positive BCs using the ASP method in 2015–2016 were significantly lower those of in 2014–2015 using the conventional one (p < 0.05). Conclusions The ASP method versus conventional one with a better efficacy can be employed as an antibiotic administration guide for MPM and VMN in the therapy of patients in community-based hospitals.
Collapse
|