1
|
Bas TG, Duarte V. Biosimilars in the Era of Artificial Intelligence-International Regulations and the Use in Oncological Treatments. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:925. [PMID: 39065775 PMCID: PMC11279612 DOI: 10.3390/ph17070925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
This research is based on three fundamental aspects of successful biosimilar development in the challenging biopharmaceutical market. First, biosimilar regulations in eight selected countries: Japan, South Korea, the United States, Canada, Brazil, Argentina, Australia, and South Africa, represent the four continents. The regulatory aspects of the countries studied are analyzed, highlighting the challenges facing biosimilars, including their complex approval processes and the need for standardized regulatory guidelines. There is an inconsistency depending on whether the biosimilar is used in a developed or developing country. In the countries observed, biosimilars are considered excellent alternatives to patent-protected biological products for the treatment of chronic diseases. In the second aspect addressed, various analytical AI modeling methods (such as machine learning tools, reinforcement learning, supervised, unsupervised, and deep learning tools) were analyzed to observe patterns that lead to the prevalence of biosimilars used in cancer to model the behaviors of the most prominent active compounds with spectroscopy. Finally, an analysis of the use of active compounds of biosimilars used in cancer and approved by the FDA and EMA was proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Gabriel Bas
- Escuela de Ciencias Empresariales, Universidad Católica del Norte, Coquimbo 1781421, Chile;
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Joshi D, Khursheed R, Gupta S, Wadhwa D, Singh TG, Sharma S, Porwal S, Gauniyal S, Vishwas S, Goyal S, Gupta G, Eri RD, Williams KA, Dua K, Singh SK. Biosimilars in Oncology: Latest Trends and Regulatory Status. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14122721. [PMID: 36559215 PMCID: PMC9784530 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14122721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Biologic-based medicines are used to treat a variety of diseases and account for around one-quarter of the worldwide pharmaceutical market. The use of biologic medications among cancer patients has resulted in substantial advancements in cancer treatment and supportive care. Biosimilar medications (or biosimilars) are very similar to the reference biologic drugs, although they are not identical. As patent protection for some of the most extensively used biologics begins to expire, biosimilars have the potential to enhance access and provide lower-cost options for cancer treatment. Initially, regulatory guidelines were set up in Europe in 2003, and the first biosimilar was approved in 2006 in Europe. Many countries, including the United States of America (USA), Canada, and Japan, have adopted Europe's worldwide regulatory framework. The use of numerous biosimilars in the treatment and supportive care of cancer has been approved and, indeed, the count is set to climb in the future around the world. However, there are many challenges associated with biosimilars, such as cost, immunogenicity, lack of awareness, extrapolation of indications, and interchangeability. The purpose of this review is to provide an insight into biosimilars, which include various options available for oncology, and the associated adverse events. We compare the regulatory guidelines for biosimilars across the world, and also present the latest trends and challenges in medical oncology both now and in the future, which will assist healthcare professionals, payers, and patients in making informed decisions, increasing the acceptance of biosimilars in clinical practice, increasing accessibility, and speeding up the health and economic benefits associated with biosimilars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deeksha Joshi
- Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, India
| | - Rubiya Khursheed
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India
| | - Saurabh Gupta
- Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, India
| | - Diksha Wadhwa
- Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, India
| | | | - Sumit Sharma
- Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi 110017, India
| | - Sejal Porwal
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Amity University Lucknow, Lucknow 226028, India
| | - Swati Gauniyal
- Department of Pharmacology, KLE College of Pharmacy, Hubballi 580031, India
| | - Sukriti Vishwas
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India
| | - Sanjay Goyal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Government Medical College, Patiala 147001, India
| | - Gaurav Gupta
- School of Pharmacy, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Mahal Road, Jagatpura 333031, India
- Department of Pharmacology, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 602117, India
- Uttaranchal Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun 248007, India
| | - Rajaraman D. Eri
- School of Science, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia
- Correspondence: (R.D.E.); (S.K.S.); Tel.: +61-3-6324-5467 (R.D.E.); +91-9888720835 (S.K.S.)
| | - Kylie A. Williams
- Discipline of Pharmacy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
| | - Kamal Dua
- Discipline of Pharmacy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
- Faculty of Health, Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
| | - Sachin Kumar Singh
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India
- Faculty of Health, Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
- Correspondence: (R.D.E.); (S.K.S.); Tel.: +61-3-6324-5467 (R.D.E.); +91-9888720835 (S.K.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ditani AS, Mallick PP, Anup N, Tambe V, Polaka S, Sengupta P, Rajpoot K, Tekade RK. Biosimilars accessible in the market for the treatment of cancer. J Control Release 2021; 336:112-129. [PMID: 34126171 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Biosimilars are the biological product clinically identical to a biologic reference standard regarding their strength, purity, and safety. A large segment of biosimilars has been developed for the treatment of cancer. This review aims to discuss various facets of biosimilars and explicates on biosimilars accessible in the market for cancer clinical intervention. It also illustrates the outcomes of recent clinical trial studies concerning biosimilars. Further, it also crosstalk the safety profiles, regulatory approval requirements, and allied challenges therein. The work will be of significant interest to researchers working in the field of biologics and biosimilars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aayushi S Ditani
- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research-Ahmedabad (NIPER-A), An Institute of National Importance, Government of India, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp. Air force station, Gandhinagar 382355, Gujarat, India
| | - Pragyan Paramita Mallick
- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research-Ahmedabad (NIPER-A), An Institute of National Importance, Government of India, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp. Air force station, Gandhinagar 382355, Gujarat, India
| | - Neelima Anup
- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research-Ahmedabad (NIPER-A), An Institute of National Importance, Government of India, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp. Air force station, Gandhinagar 382355, Gujarat, India
| | - Vishakha Tambe
- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research-Ahmedabad (NIPER-A), An Institute of National Importance, Government of India, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp. Air force station, Gandhinagar 382355, Gujarat, India
| | - Suryanarayana Polaka
- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research-Ahmedabad (NIPER-A), An Institute of National Importance, Government of India, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp. Air force station, Gandhinagar 382355, Gujarat, India
| | - Pinaki Sengupta
- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research-Ahmedabad (NIPER-A), An Institute of National Importance, Government of India, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp. Air force station, Gandhinagar 382355, Gujarat, India
| | - Kuldeep Rajpoot
- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research-Ahmedabad (NIPER-A), An Institute of National Importance, Government of India, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp. Air force station, Gandhinagar 382355, Gujarat, India
| | - Rakesh K Tekade
- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research-Ahmedabad (NIPER-A), An Institute of National Importance, Government of India, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp. Air force station, Gandhinagar 382355, Gujarat, India.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ingram B, Lumsden RS, Radosavljevic A, Kobryn C. Analysis of the Regulatory Science Applied to a Single Portfolio of Eight Biosimilar Product Approvals by Four Key Regulatory Authorities. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14040306. [PMID: 33915725 PMCID: PMC8067310 DOI: 10.3390/ph14040306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Slow uptake of biosimilars in some regions is often attributed to a lack of knowledge combined with concerns about safety and efficacy. To alleviate physician and patient apprehensions, regulatory reviews from four major regulatory authorities (RAs) (European Medicines Agency, US Food and Drug Administration, Health Canada, and Japan Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Authority) across a portfolio of eight biosimilars were analyzed to provide insight into RA review focus and approach. RA queries were evaluated in an unbiased and systematic manner by major classification (Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls [CMC], nonclinical, clinical or regulatory) and then via detailed sub-classification. There was a consistent, predominant focus on CMC from all RAs. The review focus based on sub-classification of clinical and regulatory queries was influenced by molecular complexity, with significant differences between categories (monoclonal antibody or protein) in the distribution of query topics; specifically, bioanalytical (p = 0.023), comparative safety and efficacy (p = 0.023), and statutory (including the justification of extrapolation) (p = 0.00033). Each biosimilar had a distinct distribution of clinical query topics, tailored to product-specific data. This analysis elucidated areas of heightened RA interest, and validated their application of regulatory science in the evaluation of biosimilar safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverly Ingram
- Pfizer Inc., Andover, MA 01810, USA;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-978-247-4558
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Use of Bevacizumab in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Consensus from an Expert Panel Oncologists. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40944-020-00485-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To discuss and reach a consensus on the use of bevacizumab in women with advanced ovarian cancer in Indian settings.
Methods
An advisory board meeting comprising Indian oncologists was convened to review key literature available on the role of bevacizumab in the management of advanced ovarian cancer. Key recommendations were devised via consensus by the expert panel based on the analysis of available scientific evidence and clinical experience.
Results
The expert panel recommends the use of bevacizumab in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in first-line settings, as well as in recurrent settings.
Conclusion
This document summarizes key discussion points and recommendations provided by the advisory panel, which helps guide clinicians on the use of bevacizumab for managing advanced ovarian cancer in the Indian setting. It also acts as a pragmatic tool to assist clinicians in making appropriate treatment decisions with respect to advanced ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
6
|
Santos-Neto JF, Oliveira FO, Hodel KVS, Fonseca LMS, Badaró R, Machado BAS. Technological Advancements in Monoclonal Antibodies. ScientificWorldJournal 2021; 2021:6663708. [PMID: 33628140 PMCID: PMC7892242 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6663708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Biopharmaceuticals are innovative solutions that have revolutionized the treatment of important chronic diseases and malignancies. The approval of biosimilar products has become a complex and balanced process, and there are versions of drugs with established biosimilarity that can offer a more accessible treatment option to patients. The objective of this work was to identify the advancement of these technologies by means of patent and article analysis based on technological and scientific prospection. In patent document recovery, Derwent Innovation Index (DWPI) and PatentInspiration databases were used. The research was based on the search of the selected terms in the title, summary, and claims of the documents through a search strategy containing IPC code and keywords. In articles recovery, the Web of Science tool was used in the search of scientific publications dated from the last 5 years. The search resulted in a total of 2295 individual patent documents and 467 families using DWPI database, 769 individual patents and 205 families using PatentInspiration, and 2602 articles using Web of Science database. Additionally, this work describes the number of organizations that contribute to this area, where they are, how much development they have undergone, and the inventors/authors involved. Based on the number of publications registered, there is an important prominence for scientific research in mAbs. In terms of innovation, it is expected that several therapeutic drugs are already under regulatory review, which will allow drugs to be approved over the next few years and will thus generate a continuous flow of new products based on immunotherapies, mAbs, and biosimilar drugs. These drugs have become essential weapons for the treatment of significant diseases, and the increasing trend in the number of related scientific and technological publications contributes to making these therapies available to the greatest number of people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José F. Santos-Neto
- University Center SENAI/CIMATEC, National Service of Industrial Learning–SENAI, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Fabricia O. Oliveira
- SENAI Institute of Innovation (ISI) in Advanced Health Systems (CIMATEC ISI SAS), University Center SENAI/CIMATEC, National Service of Industrial Learning–SENAI, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Katharine V. S. Hodel
- SENAI Institute of Innovation (ISI) in Advanced Health Systems (CIMATEC ISI SAS), University Center SENAI/CIMATEC, National Service of Industrial Learning–SENAI, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Larissa M. S. Fonseca
- SENAI Institute of Innovation (ISI) in Advanced Health Systems (CIMATEC ISI SAS), University Center SENAI/CIMATEC, National Service of Industrial Learning–SENAI, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Roberto Badaró
- SENAI Institute of Innovation (ISI) in Advanced Health Systems (CIMATEC ISI SAS), University Center SENAI/CIMATEC, National Service of Industrial Learning–SENAI, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Bruna A. S. Machado
- University Center SENAI/CIMATEC, National Service of Industrial Learning–SENAI, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
- SENAI Institute of Innovation (ISI) in Advanced Health Systems (CIMATEC ISI SAS), University Center SENAI/CIMATEC, National Service of Industrial Learning–SENAI, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dutta B, Huys I, Vulto AG, Simoens S. Identifying Key Benefits in European Off-Patent Biologics and Biosimilar Markets: It is Not Only About Price! BioDrugs 2021; 34:159-170. [PMID: 31792843 PMCID: PMC7113204 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-019-00395-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Biosimilar medicines have shown similarity with the originator biologic and offer a similar clinical outcome generally at a lower cost. This paper identifies benefits of off-patent biologics and biosimilars, and illustrates these benefits with empirical data from Europe. We provide a narrative review of published literature on values and benefits of biosimilars in Europe. The results describe cost savings as the key driver stemming from the lower price of biosimilars, than that of originator products, and from price competition between biosimilar(s), originator, and next-generation products. Cost savings may then translate into a number of other associated benefits. The lower price of biosimilars and similar effectiveness to the originator biologics improve cost effectiveness, implying that reimbursement can be granted or extended to other patient groups, or that the biologic therapy can be moved to an earlier line of treatment. Cost savings from biosimilars can be used to increase patient access to therapy or to increase the number of healthcare professionals. Finally, competition between off-patent biologics and biosimilars may stimulate an innovation in the formulation and development of next-generation biologics. Our paper illustrates that the benefit of off-patent biologics and biosimilars is not restricted to cost savings, but that these medicines may contribute to an expansion of medical treatment options for patients, hence concomitantly contributing to the long-term sustainability of the healthcare system. This review provides a broader view for clinical and economic decision makers and healthcare professionals on the added benefits of off-patent biologics and their use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binita Dutta
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Arnold G Vulto
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium. .,Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Clinical and Regulatory Concerns of Biosimilars: A Review of Literature. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17165800. [PMID: 32796549 PMCID: PMC7460311 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17165800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Although biosimilars have been part of clinical practice for more than a decade, healthcare professionals (HCPs) do not fully accept them. This is because of the perception that biosimilars may not be like their originators in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy. This study aims to evaluate the current knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals toward biosimilar prescription, and to elaborate on their concerns. We reviewed the literature using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct electronic databases in the period from 2018 to 2020. The knowledge and confidence of healthcare professionals vary between countries, between clinical profiles and between studies. Although most of the healthcare professionals had a positive attitude to prescribing biosimilars, they would still prefer to prescribe them in initial treatment. Generally, HCPs were against multiple switches and substitution of biosimilars at the pharmacy level. HCP's key concern was interchangeability, with eventual consequences on the clinical outcome of patients. HCPs still approach biosimilars with caution and stigma. HCPs need to have an unbiased coherent understanding of biosimilars at clinical, molecular and regulatory levels. It was also observed that most of their concerns are more theoretical than science-based. Physicians are in an excellent position to accept biosimilars, but they need the additional support of regulatory authorities to approve and take into consideration the available scientific data regarding biosimilars.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bellinvia S, Edwards CJ. Explaining biosimilars and how reverse engineering plays a critical role in their development. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2020; 15:1283-1289. [PMID: 32717155 DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2020.1796627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biologicals are protein-based therapeutics consisting of larger and more complex structures than small molecule medicines. As the patents for originator biological therapeutics expire, biosimilar products are licensed for the same indications as their marketed reference biologics across different specialities. Owing to the complex nature of the manufacturing process for a biological therapy compared to conventional chemically synthetized medicines, the development of biosimilars is more complicated and costly than the manufacture of generic small molecules. AREAS COVERED The manufacturing process of the originator biologic is in most cases largely unknown to biosimilar developers and therefore reverse engineering through extensive analysis of the originator is a fundamental and critical step for successful biosimilar development. In this review, the authors examine the abbreviated roadmap for biosimilar approval which must be underpinned by the same rigorous standards that apply to all biological medicines. They discuss various aspects of biosimilar manufacturing with a focus on reverse engineering. EXPERT OPINION The biosimilar approval pathway places a greater emphasis on preclinical assessments in comparison to the development of originator biologics. Multiple comparative clinical studies add little to the confirmation of the efficacy of the molecule under study whilst adding considerably to the cost and time of bringing a biosimilar into clinical use. A successful demonstration of biosimilarity to the reference product is therefore essential at a structural and functional level but this could not be achieved without well-designed and quality-driven reverse engineering of the originator production process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Bellinvia
- Department of Rheumatology and NIHR Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust , Southampton, UK
| | - Christopher J Edwards
- Department of Rheumatology and NIHR Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust , Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Waller CF, Friganović A. Biosimilars in oncology: key role of nurses in patient education. Future Oncol 2020; 16:1931-1939. [PMID: 32618476 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Biosimilars have the potential to lower costs and increase patient access to life-saving cancer therapies. However, lack of familiarity with biosimilars can be a barrier to their adoption, limiting their health and economic benefits. As highly trusted healthcare providers, nurses play integral roles in patient education. This review aims to help prepare nurses to respond to potential questions from patients on biosimilars. The regulation, use and potential benefits of biosimilars are discussed, with a focus on biosimilars in oncology. Overall, biosimilars are highly regulated medicines that provide comparable benefits to available biologics. Nurses can influence the adoption of biosimilars through patient education and can impact the future of the field in their expanding roles within health care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelius F Waller
- Department of Haematology, Oncology & Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Centre Freiburg & Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Adriano Friganović
- Department of Anesthesiology & Intensive Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.,Department of Nursing, University of Applied Health Sciences, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Steinberg J, Fragoso YD, Duran Quiroz JC, García JR, Guerra C, Rodriguez V, Carcamo Rodriguez C, Ciampi E, Correa-Diaz E, Macías M, Novarro N, Vizcarra D, Oehninger Gatti C, Orozco G, Carrá A. Practical Issues Concerning the Approval and Use of Biosimilar Drugs for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis in Latin America. Neurol Ther 2019; 8:207-214. [PMID: 31127566 PMCID: PMC6858893 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-019-0139-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of biosimilar drugs for multiple sclerosis (MS) has become widespread in Latin America, with the goal of reducing costs of treatments, promoting the sustainability of healthcare systems, and improving patient access to these therapies. There is currently a need to define and comply with requirements to guarantee the efficacy, safety, and quality of these drugs. Thus, the objective of the present study was to compile up-to-date information from each Latin American country assessed on (a) approval of biosimilar drugs by regulatory agencies; (b) use of biosimilar drugs, pharmacovigilance plans, risk management; and (c) update in the knowledge on different molecules. To do so, a group of experts from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela met to discuss the current situation regarding good practices and risks associated with the use of biosimilar drugs in their respective countries. Regulation, risk management plans, and pharmacovigilance in the whole continent must guide the strategies on the commercialization and access of biosimilar drugs and copies of complex molecules. Current regulations must be implemented for the registration of biosimilar drug products and complex molecules. It is paramount to ensure that new products follow the best quality standards at all stages beyond being safe and efficient. Uncontrolled interchangeability between original biological and biosimilar should be avoided. Latin America requires the implementation and full use of strong pharmacovigilance programs. National and multinational clinical studies are required to demonstrate the similarity in safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity profiles of complex molecules, as well as biological and biosimilar products. Plain language summary available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yara D Fragoso
- MS Reference Center, Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, MS and Headache Research, Santos, Brazil.
| | | | - Juan Raul García
- Unidad de Enfermedades Desmielinizantes Nivel Nacional, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | | | - Ethel Ciampi
- Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Neurología, Hospital Dr. Sótero del Río, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Miguel Macías
- Departamento de Neurociencias y Doctorado de Farmacologia, CUCS, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
| | - Nelson Novarro
- Complejo Hospitalario Metropolitano, Caja de Seguro Social, Panama City, Panama
| | - Darwin Vizcarra
- Hypnos Instituto del Sueno, Clínica San Felipe, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | | | - Geraldine Orozco
- Hospital Patrocinio Peñuela Ruiz, Instituto Venezolano de los Seguros Sociales, Centro Especialidades San Sebastián, San Cristóbal, Táchira, Venezuela
| | - Adriana Carrá
- MS Section, Hospital Británico de CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Neurociencias, Fundación Favaloro-INECO, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Konstantinidou S, Papaspiliou A, Kokkotou E. Current and future roles of biosimilars in oncology practice. Oncol Lett 2019; 19:45-51. [PMID: 31897113 PMCID: PMC6923870 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.11105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Biologics have been used increasingly in the treatment and supportive care of cancer; however, their high cost places a significant burden on healthcare systems. The expiration of patents for biologics has led to the development of biosimilars, with the aim of reducing cost and increasing accessibility to novel treatments, which are affordable for a greater number of patients. Biosimilars are highly similar but not identical to the reference products; therefore, strict regulatory requirements have been formed for their approval. This ensures that there are no clinically meaningful differences compared with respective biologics, with regard to purity, safety and efficacy. In 2003, a regulatory framework for the approval of biosimilars was established in Europe, whereas the USA did not implement a framework until 2009, when the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act was formed. A number of biosimilars have currently been approved in oncology and the number is expected to rise in the near future. More than 10 years of evidence has revealed that biosimilars are safe and effective; however healthcare professionals need to be further educated to eliminate potential misconceptions and integrate biosimilars into routine clinical practice. The present review aims to provide an overview of the biosimilars used in Europe and the USA, present their main benefits and challenges, and discuss their current and future roles in medical oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Konstantinidou
- Oncology Unit, The Third Department of Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 27 Athens, Greece
| | - Angeliki Papaspiliou
- Oncology Unit, The Third Department of Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 27 Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni Kokkotou
- Oncology Unit, The Third Department of Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 27 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Miller EM, Schwartzberg LS. Biosimilars for breast cancer: a review of HER2-targeted antibodies in the United States. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2019; 11:1758835919887044. [PMID: 31798693 PMCID: PMC6859678 DOI: 10.1177/1758835919887044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The utilization of trastuzumab biosimilar medications is of particular interest in HER2-positive breast cancer as these drugs have the potential for cost savings and increased utilization/access to HER2 targeted therapy in both early stage and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancers. Five trastuzumab biosimilars: MYL-1401O (Ogivri), CT-P6 (Herzuma), SB3 (Ontruzant), PF-05280014 (Trazimera), and ABP980 (Kanjinti), have now been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in HER2-positive breast cancers. This review provides an overview of these agents with special consideration of the development and approval process, including available clinical data results for these trastuzumab biosimilars. Adoption in the clinic will depend on the degree of comfort with the overall evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily M Miller
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Germantown, TN, USA
| | - Lee S Schwartzberg
- West Cancer Center, 7945 Wolf River Boulevard, Germantown, TN 38183, USA. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Germantown, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cuellar S, McBride A, Medina P. Pharmacist perspectives and considerations for implementation of therapeutic oncology biosimilars in practice. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2019; 76:1725-1738. [DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
An overview of therapeutic oncology biosimilars, the U.S. biosimilars regulatory pathway, and the clinical development of selected biosimilar products is provided, including discussion of considerations in adopting biosimilars into oncology practice.
Summary
Biosimilars are biologic agents that are highly similar to and have no clinically meaningful differences from an approved reference product in terms of safety, purity, and potency. There is a large market for cancer biologics, and approval of biosimilars has the potential to increase access to care and reduce costs. An abbreviated regulatory pathway for the development and approval of biosimilars defines a stepwise approach to demonstrating biosimilarity and conducting clinical comparative trials to confirm equivalent pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity to the reference product. Three therapeutic biologics (bevacizumab, trastuzumab, and rituximab) have been used extensively in the treatment of a variety of cancers and are targets for biosimilar product development. Preclinical and clinical experience with 2 recently approved biosimilars to bevacizumab and trastuzumab is reviewed. Challenges faced by pharmacy and therapeutics committees when considering oncology biosimilars for formulary inclusion are discussed.
Conclusion
Increased adoption of biosimilars could potentially lower treatment costs and improve access to biologics for patients with cancer. Key considerations in formulary review of biosimilars include the quality and quantity of data from comparative clinical trials, economic factors, manufacturer reliability, and challenges associated with incorporating biosimilars into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Cuellar
- University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL
| | - Ali McBride
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ
| | - Patrick Medina
- University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Haymond A, Davis JB, Espina V. Proteomics for cancer drug design. Expert Rev Proteomics 2019; 16:647-664. [PMID: 31353977 PMCID: PMC6736641 DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2019.1650025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Signal transduction cascades drive cellular proliferation, apoptosis, immune, and survival pathways. Proteins have emerged as actionable drug targets because they are often dysregulated in cancer, due to underlying genetic mutations, or dysregulated signaling pathways. Cancer drug development relies on proteomic technologies to identify potential biomarkers, mechanisms-of-action, and to identify protein binding hot spots. Areas covered: Brief summaries of proteomic technologies for drug discovery include mass spectrometry, reverse phase protein arrays, chemoproteomics, and fragment based screening. Protein-protein interface mapping is presented as a promising method for peptide therapeutic development. The topic of biosimilar therapeutics is presented as an opportunity to apply proteomic technologies to this new class of cancer drug. Expert opinion: Proteomic technologies are indispensable for drug discovery. A suite of technologies including mass spectrometry, reverse phase protein arrays, and protein-protein interaction mapping provide complimentary information for drug development. These assays have matured into well controlled, robust technologies. Recent regulatory approval of biosimilar therapeutics provides another opportunity to decipher the molecular nuances of their unique mechanisms of action. The ability to identify previously hidden protein hot spots is expanding the gamut of potential drug targets. Proteomic profiling permits lead compound evaluation beyond the one drug, one target paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Haymond
- Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University , Manassas , VA , USA
| | - Justin B Davis
- Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University , Manassas , VA , USA
| | - Virginia Espina
- Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University , Manassas , VA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zharkov A, Barton B, Heinzmann D, Bakalos G, Schreitmüller T. Development pathways for subcutaneous formulations of biologics versus biosimilar development. EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2019.1585806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Zharkov
- Global Product Development Medical Affairs, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Bettina Barton
- Global Product Development Medical Affairs, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Georgios Bakalos
- Global Product Development Medical Affairs, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomathematics, University of Thessaly School of Medicine, Larisa, Greece
| | - Thomas Schreitmüller
- Global Product Development Medical Affairs, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|