1
|
Young J, Jimenez A, Pruett M, Hancock L, Schruff M. A randomized controlled trial of analogue pharmacogenomic testing feedback for psychotropic medications. PEC INNOVATION 2023; 2:100119. [PMID: 37214496 PMCID: PMC10194257 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective To examine the impact of various presentations of pharmacogenomic testing results using a published, color-coded decision support tool (DST) format as a standard stimulus to list possible medications. Methods Participants were randomly assigned to groups and asked to decide which psychotropic medication they would prefer if depressed. Three of the groups varied the color-coded category of fluoxetine and received a statement indicating that this was the most prescribed drug for depression. A fourth control condition omitted base rate information. Participants also provided detail about their decision-making processes through a qualitative interview. Results Comparison of the first three groups indicated that significantly more participants selected medications from the highest category of likely effectiveness when fluoxetine appeared in this list. Comparison of the control group to its relevant analogue suggested no significant differences in selection strategy. Qualitative interview responses indicated participant comfort with genetic testing despite awareness of having very limited understanding of these techniques and their implications. Conclusions Both DST color-coding and base rates were influential in driving drug selection decisions, despite most participants indicating they did not understand this information. Innovation Efforts to standardize pharmacogenomic stimuli may lead to advances in methods of studying quantifiable healthcare decisions. Attention to the context for presenting test results may also be a useful source of understanding patient responses, particularly regarding complex tests that are likely to be interpreted heuristically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Young
- University of Mississippi, Department of Psychology, 207 Peabody Hall, University, MS 38677, USA
| | - Aileen Jimenez
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Pharmacy, 301 Pharmacy Lane, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Madeline Pruett
- University of Mississippi, Department of Psychology, 207 Peabody Hall, University, MS 38677, USA
| | - Laken Hancock
- University of Mississippi, Department of Psychology, 207 Peabody Hall, University, MS 38677, USA
| | - McCall Schruff
- University of Mississippi, Department of Psychology, 207 Peabody Hall, University, MS 38677, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Magavern EF, Durrani F, Raza M, Lerner R, Islam MR, Clinch M, Caulfield MJ. British South Asian ancestry participants views of pharmacogenomics clinical implementation and research: a thematic analysis. THE PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL 2023; 23:185-194. [PMID: 37907686 PMCID: PMC10661738 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-023-00317-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND South Asian ancestry populations are underrepresented in genomic studies and therapeutics trials. British South Asians suffer from multi-morbidity leading to polypharmacy. Our objective was to elucidate British South Asian ancestry community perspectives on pharmacogenomic implementation and sharing pharmacogenomic clinical data for research. METHODS Four focus groups were conducted (9-12 participants in each). Two groups were mixed gender, while one group was male only and one was female only. Simultaneous interpretation was available to participants in Urdu and Bengali. Focus groups were recorded and abridged transcription and thematic analysis were undertaken. RESULTS There were 42 participants, 64% female. 26% were born in the UK or Europe. 52% were born in Bangladesh and 17% in Pakistan. 36% reported university level education. Implementation of pharmacogenomics was perceived to be beneficial to individuals but pose a risk of overburdening resource limited systems. Pharmacogenomic research was perceived to be beneficial to the community, with concerns about data privacy and misuse. Data sharing was desirable if the researchers did not have a financial stake, and benefits would be shared. Trust was the key condition for the acceptability of both clinical implementation and research. Trust was linked with medication compliance. Education, outreach, and communication facilitate trust. CONCLUSIONS (SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY) Pharmacogenomics implementation with appropriate education and communication has the potential to enhance trust and contribute to increased medication compliance. Trust drives data sharing, which would enable enhanced representation in research. Representation in scientific evidence base could cyclically enhance trust and compliance.
Collapse
Grants
- Wellcome Trust
- This work forms part of the portfolio and was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Barts Biomedical Research Centre. EFM is funded by Barts Charity. Genes & Health is/has recently been core-funded by Wellcome (WT102627, WT210561), the Medical Research Council (UK) (M009017, MR/X009777/1, MR/X009920/1), Higher Education Funding Council for England Catalyst, Barts Charity (845/1796), Health Data Research UK (for London substantive site), and research delivery support from the NHS National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network (North Thames). Genes & Health is/has recently been funded by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Genomics PLC; and a Life Sciences Industry Consortium of Astra Zeneca PLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development Limited, Maze Therapeutics Inc, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Novo Nordisk A/S, Pfizer Inc, Takeda Development Centre Americas Inc. We thank Social Action for Health, Centre of The Cell, members of our Community Advisory Group, and staff who have recruited and collected data from volunteers. We thank the NIHR National Biosample Centre (UK Biocentre), the Social Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre (King’ College London), Wellcome Sanger Institute, and Broad Institute for sample processing, genotyping, sequencing and variant annotation.
- Genes & Health is/has recently been core-funded by Wellcome (WT102627, WT210561), the Medical Research Council (UK) (M009017, MR/X009777/1, MR/X009920/1), Higher Education Funding Council for England Catalyst, Barts Charity (845/1796), Health Data Research UK (for London substantive site), and research delivery support from the NHS National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network (North Thames). Genes & Health is/has recently been funded by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Genomics PLC; and a Life Sciences Industry Consortium of Astra Zeneca PLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development Limited, Maze Therapeutics Inc, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Novo Nordisk A/S, Pfizer Inc, Takeda Development Centre Americas Inc. We thank Social Action for Health, Centre of The Cell, members of our Community Advisory Group, and staff who have recruited and collected data from volunteers. We thank the NIHR National Biosample Centre (UK Biocentre), the Social Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre (King’ College London), Wellcome Sanger Institute, and Broad Institute for sample processing, genotyping, sequencing and variant annotation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma F Magavern
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Faiza Durrani
- Genes & Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AB, UK
| | - Mehru Raza
- Genes & Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AB, UK
| | - Robin Lerner
- Genes & Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AB, UK
| | | | - Megan Clinch
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Mark J Caulfield
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Murry LT, Hillman LA, Allen JD, Bishop JR. Intersection and Considerations for Patient-Centered Care, Patient Experience, and Medication Experience in Pharmacogenomics. PHARMACY 2023; 11:146. [PMID: 37736918 PMCID: PMC10514786 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy11050146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
As healthcare continues to embrace the concept of person- and patient-centered care, pharmacogenomics, patient experience, and medication experience will continue to play an increasingly important role in care delivery. This review highlights the intersection between these concepts and provides considerations for patient-centered medication and pharmacogenomic experiences. Elements at the patient, provider, and system level can be considered in the discussion, supporting the use of pharmacogenomics, with components of the patient and medication experience contributing to the mitigation of barriers surrounding patient use and the valuation of pharmacogenomic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan T. Murry
- College of Pharmacy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Lisa A. Hillman
- College of Pharmacy, The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; (L.A.H.); or (J.D.A.); (J.R.B.)
| | - Josiah D. Allen
- College of Pharmacy, The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; (L.A.H.); or (J.D.A.); (J.R.B.)
- Department of Pharmacy, St. Elizabeth Healthcare, Edgewood, KY 41017, USA
| | - Jeffrey R. Bishop
- College of Pharmacy, The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; (L.A.H.); or (J.D.A.); (J.R.B.)
- Medical School, The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kodida R, Reble E, Clausen M, Shickh S, Mighton C, Sam J, Forster N, Panchal S, Aronson M, Semotiuk K, Graham T, Silberman Y, Randall Armel S, McCuaig JM, Cohn I, Morel CF, Elser C, Eisen A, Carroll JC, Glogowski E, Schrader KA, Di Gioacchino V, Lerner-Ellis J, Kim RH, Bombard Y. A model for the return and referral of all clinically significant secondary findings of genomic sequencing. J Med Genet 2023; 60:733-739. [PMID: 37217257 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-109091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Secondary findings (SFs) identified through genomic sequencing (GS) can offer a wide range of health benefits to patients. Resource and capacity constraints pose a challenge to their clinical management; therefore, clinical workflows are needed to optimise the health benefits of SFs. In this paper, we describe a model we created for the return and referral of all clinically significant SFs, beyond medically actionable results, from GS. As part of a randomised controlled trial evaluating the outcomes and costs of disclosing all clinically significant SFs from GS, we consulted genetics and primary care experts to determine a feasible workflow to manage SFs. Consensus was sought to determine appropriate clinical recommendations for each category of SF and which clinician specialist would provide follow-up care. We developed a communication and referral plan for each category of SFs. This involved referrals to specialised clinics, such as an Adult Genetics clinic, for highly penetrant medically actionable findings. Common and non-urgent SFs, such as pharmacogenomics and carrier status results for non-family planning participants, were directed back to the family physician (FP). SF results and recommendations were communicated directly to participants to respect autonomy and to their FPs to support follow-up of SFs. We describe a model for the return and referral of all clinically significant SFs to facilitate the utility of GS and promote the health benefits of SFs. This may serve as a model for others returning GS results transitioning participants from research to clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Kodida
- Genomics Health Services & Policy Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emma Reble
- Genomics Health Services & Policy Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc Clausen
- Genomics Health Services & Policy Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Salma Shickh
- Genomics Health Services & Policy Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chloe Mighton
- Genomics Health Services & Policy Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jordan Sam
- Genomics Health Services & Policy Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicole Forster
- Fred A. Litwin Family Centre in Genetic Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Seema Panchal
- The Marvelle Koffler Breast Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melyssa Aronson
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kara Semotiuk
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tracy Graham
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yael Silberman
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Randall Armel
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeanna M McCuaig
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Iris Cohn
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chantal F Morel
- Fred A. Litwin Family Centre in Genetic Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christine Elser
- The Marvelle Koffler Breast Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - June C Carroll
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Granovsky Gluskin Family Medicine Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kasmintan A Schrader
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Vanessa Di Gioacchino
- The Marvelle Koffler Breast Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jordan Lerner-Ellis
- Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Raymond H Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Genomics Health Services & Policy Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Allen JD, Pittenger AL, Bishop JR. A Scoping Review of Attitudes and Experiences with Pharmacogenomic Testing among Patients and the General Public: Implications for Patient Counseling. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12030425. [PMID: 35330430 PMCID: PMC8953117 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12030425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of pharmacogenomic (PGx) tests is increasing, but there are not standard approaches to counseling patients on their implications or results. To inform approaches for patient counseling, we conducted a scoping review of published literature on patient experiences with PGx testing and performed a thematic analysis of qualitative and quantitative reports. A structured scoping review was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. The search identified 37 articles (involving n = 6252 participants) published between 2010 and 2021 from a diverse range of populations and using a variety of study methodologies. Thematic analysis identified five themes (reasons for testing/perceived benefit, understanding of results, psychological response, impact of testing on patient/provider relationship, concerns about testing/perceived harm) and 22 subthemes. These results provide valuable context and potential areas of focus during patient counseling on PGx. Many of the knowledge gaps, misunderstandings, and concerns that participants identified could be mitigated by pre- and post-test counseling. More research is needed on patients’ PGx literacy needs, along with the development of a standardized, open-source patient education curriculum and the development of validated PGx literacy assessment tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josiah D. Allen
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;
- Medigenics Consulting, LLC, Minneapolis, MN 55407, USA
| | - Amy L. Pittenger
- Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;
| | - Jeffrey R. Bishop
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Subasri M, Barrett D, Sibalija J, Bitacola L, Kim RB. Pharmacogenomic-based personalized medicine: Multistakeholder perspectives on implementational drivers and barriers in the Canadian healthcare system. Clin Transl Sci 2021; 14:2231-2241. [PMID: 34080317 PMCID: PMC8604218 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Pharmacogenomics (PGx)-based personalized medicine (PM) is increasingly utilized to guide treatment decisions for many drug-disease combinations. Notably, London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) has pioneered a PGx program that has become a staple for London-based specialists. Although implementational studies have been conducted in other jurisdictions, the Canadian healthcare system is understudied. Herein, the multistakeholder perspectives on implementational drivers and barriers are elucidated. Using a mixed-method qualitative model, key stakeholders, and patients from LHSC's PGx-based PM clinic were interviewed and surveyed, respectively. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed in a stepwise process of customer profiling, value mapping, and business model canvasing. Value for LHSC located specialist users of PGx was driven by the quick turnaround time, independence of the PGx clinic, and the quality of information. Engagement of external specialists was only limited by access and awareness, whereas other healthcare nonusers were limited by education and applicability. The major determinant of successful adoption at novel sites were institutional champions. Patients valued and approved of the service, expressed a general willingness to pay, but often traveled far to receive genotyping. This paper discusses the critical pillars of education, awareness, advocacy, and efficiency required to address implementation barriers to healthcare service innovation in Canada. Further adoption of PGx practices into Canadian hospitals is an important factor for advancing system-level changes in care delivery, patient experiences, and outcomes. The findings in this paper can help inform efforts to advance clinical PGx practices, but also the potential adoption and implementation of other innovative healthcare service solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathushan Subasri
- Ivey Business School, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.,London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Barrett
- Ivey Business School, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jovana Sibalija
- Ivey Business School, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.,Faculty of Social Science, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Richard B Kim
- Ivey Business School, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.,London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Young J, Bhattacharya K, Ramachandran S, Lee A, Bentley JP. Rates of genetic testing in patients prescribed drugs with pharmacogenomic information in FDA-approved labeling. THE PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL 2021; 21:318-325. [PMID: 33589791 PMCID: PMC7883752 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-021-00211-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
This study examined rates of genetic testing in two cohorts of publicly insured individuals who have newly prescribed medication with FDA pharmacogenomic labeling guidance. Genetic testing was rare (4.4% and 10.5% in Medicaid and Medicare cohorts, respectively) despite the fact that all participants selected were taking medications that contained pharmacogenomic labeling information. When testing was conducted it was typically done before the initial use of a target medication. Factors that emerged as predictors of the likelihood of undergoing genetic testing included White ethnicity (vs. Black), female gender, and age. Cost analyses indicated higher expenditures in groups receiving genetic testing vs. matched comparators with no genetic testing, as well as disparities between proactively and reactively tested groups (albeit in opposite directions across cohorts). Results are discussed in terms of the possible reasons for the low base rate of testing, mechanisms of increased cost, and barriers to dissemination and implementation of these tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Young
- Department of Psychology, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA.
| | - Kaustuv Bhattacharya
- Department of Pharmacy Administration, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA
| | - Sujith Ramachandran
- Department of Pharmacy Administration, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA
| | - Aaron Lee
- Department of Psychology, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA
| | - John P Bentley
- Department of Pharmacy Administration, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Meagher KM, Curtis SH, Borucki S, Beck A, Srinivasan T, Cheema A, Sharp RR. Communicating unexpected pharmacogenomic results to biobank contributors: A focus group study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:242-249. [PMID: 32919825 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The goals of this study were to explore 1) the impact of returning unexpected pharmacogenomic (PGx) results to biobank contributors, and 2) participant views about improving communication. METHODS We conducted a qualitative focus group study with biobank participants (N = 54) who were notified by mail of an individual research result indicating increased risk for adverse events associated with the common cancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). We employed a framework approach for analysis. RESULTS Our results revealed three themes illustrating participants' questions and uncertainty, especially regarding how to share results with health providers and family members, and remember them over time. Participants valued results for themselves and others, and for the future of medicine. Risk perception was framed by health identity. "Toxicity narratives," or familiarity with another's adverse reaction to chemotherapy, increased the sense of importance participants reported. CONCLUSION These focus group results highlight research participant remaining questions and high valuation of PGx results, even when unexpected. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS We identify PGx research participants' needs for clear clinical translation messaging that attends to health identity, pragmatics of sharing information with family members, and patient perceptions of barriers to transferring research results to a clinical context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M Meagher
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Susan H Curtis
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | | | - Annika Beck
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | | | - Amal Cheema
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA
| | - Richard R Sharp
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abou Diwan E, Zeitoun RI, Abou Haidar L, Cascorbi I, Khoueiry Zgheib N. Implementation and obstacles of pharmacogenetics in clinical practice: An international survey. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2019; 85:2076-2088. [PMID: 31141189 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Eight years ago, a paper-based survey was administered during the World Pharma 2010 meeting, asking about the challenges of implementing pharmacogenetics (PGx) in clinical practice. The data collected at the time gave an idea about the progress of this implementation and what still needs to be done. Since then, although there have been major initiatives to push PGx forward, PGx clinical implementation may still be facing different challenges in different parts of the world. Our aim was therefore to distribute a follow-up international survey in electronic format to elucidate an overview on the current stage of implementation, acceptance and challenges of PGx in academic institutions around the world. METHODS This is an online anonymous LimeSurvey-based study launched on 11 November 2018. Survey questions were adapted from the initially published manuscript in 2010. An extensive web search for worldwide scientists potentially involved in PGx research resulted in a total of 1973 names. Countries were grouped based on the Human Development Index. RESULTS There were 204 respondents from 43 countries. Despite the wide availability of PGx tests, the consistently positive attitude towards their applications and advances in the field, progress of the clinical implementation of PGx still faces many challenges all around the globe. CONCLUSIONS Clinical implementation of PGx started over a decade ago but there is a gap in progress around the globe and discrepancies between the challenges reported by different countries, despite some challenges being universal. Further studies on ways to overcome these challenges are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ralph I Zeitoun
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Lea Abou Haidar
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ingolf Cascorbi
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Nathalie Khoueiry Zgheib
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|