1
|
Isselhard A, Lautz Z, Töpper M, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Vitinius F, Fischer H, Berger-Höger B, Steckelberg A, Beifus K, Köberlein-Neu J, Stock S. Coping Self-Efficacy and Its Relationship with Psychological Morbidity after Genetic Test Result Disclosure: Results from Cancer-Unaffected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:1684. [PMID: 36767056 PMCID: PMC9914784 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20031684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Women who are found to carry a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant experience psychological distress due to an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. They may decide between different preventive options. In this secondary analysis of data collected alongside a larger randomized controlled trial, we are looking at 130 newly found BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers and how their coping self-efficacy immediately after genetic test result disclosure is related to their psychological burden and status of preventive decision making. Participants received the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Impact of Event Scale, the Decisional Conflict Scale, and the Stage of Decision-Making Scale after positive genetic test result disclosure. We found that women with higher coping self-efficacy showed fewer symptoms of anxiety or depression and were less affected by receiving the genetic test result in terms of post-traumatic stress. However, coping self-efficacy had no relationship with any decision-related criteria, such as decisional conflict or stage of decision making. This shows that despite its buffering capacity on psychological burden, possessing coping self-efficacy does not lead to more decisiveness in preference-sensitive decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Isselhard
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Zoe Lautz
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Maren Töpper
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Frank Vitinius
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Hannah Fischer
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Birte Berger-Höger
- Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Karolina Beifus
- Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Juliane Köberlein-Neu
- Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mavragani A, Rodrigues PP, Nakazawa-Miklaševiča M, Pinto D, Miklaševičs E, Trofimovičs G, Gardovskis J, Cardoso F, Cardoso MJ. Effectiveness of Secondary Risk-Reducing Strategies in Patients With Unilateral Breast Cancer With Pathogenic Variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Subjected to Breast-Conserving Surgery: Evidence-Based Simulation Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e37144. [PMID: 36580360 PMCID: PMC9837710 DOI: 10.2196/37144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 62% of patients with breast cancer with a pathogenic variant (BRCA1 or BRCA2) undergo primary breast-conserving therapy. OBJECTIVE The study aims to develop a personalized risk management decision support tool for carriers of a pathogenic variant (BRCA1 or BRCA2) who underwent breast-conserving therapy for unilateral early-stage breast cancer. METHODS We developed a Bayesian network model of a hypothetical cohort of carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 diagnosed with stage I/II unilateral breast cancer and treated with breast-conserving treatment who underwent subsequent second primary cancer risk-reducing strategies. Using event dependencies structured according to expert knowledge and conditional probabilities obtained from published evidence, we predicted the 40-year overall survival rate of different risk-reducing strategies for 144 cohorts of women defined by the type of pathogenic variants (BRCA1 or BRCA2), age at primary breast cancer diagnosis, breast cancer subtype, stage of primary breast cancer, and presence or absence of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Absence of adjuvant chemotherapy was the most powerful factor that was linked to a dramatic decline in survival. There was a negligible decline in the mortality in patients with triple-negative breast cancer, who received no chemotherapy and underwent any secondary risk-reducing strategy, compared with surveillance. The potential survival benefit from any risk-reducing strategy was more modest in patients with triple-negative breast cancer who received chemotherapy compared with patients with luminal breast cancer. However, most patients with triple-negative breast cancer in stage I benefited from bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or just risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Most patients with luminal stage I/II unilateral breast cancer benefited from bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. The impact of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in patients with luminal breast cancer in stage I/II increased with age. Most older patients with the BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants in exons 12-24/25 with luminal breast cancer may gain a similar survival benefit from other risk-reducing strategies or surveillance. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that it is mandatory to consider the complex interplay between the types of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants, age at primary breast cancer diagnosis, breast cancer subtype and stage, and received systemic treatment. As no prospective study results are available at the moment, our simulation model, which will integrate a decision support system in the near future, could facilitate the conversation between the health care provider and patient and help to weigh all the options for risk-reducing strategies leading to a more balanced decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pedro Pereira Rodrigues
- Information and Health Decision Sciences of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - David Pinto
- Breast Cancer Unit, Champalimaud Cancer Center, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | - Jānis Gardovskis
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Rīga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Cancer Unit, Champalimaud Cancer Center, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Landau C, Novak AM, Ganz AB, Rolnik B, Friedman E, Lev-Ari S. Effect of Inquiry-Based Stress Reduction on Well-being and Views on Risk-Reducing Surgery Among Women With BRCA Variants in Israel: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2139670. [PMID: 34962562 PMCID: PMC8715352 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The high risk for breast and ovarian cancers conferred by being a carrier of BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline variant can negatively impact physical and psychological well-being. Novel nonpharmacological interventions on well-being in women with BRCA variants have rarely been reported. OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of a 12-week inquiry-based stress reduction (IBSR) program on psychological well-being, sleep quality, psychosocial variables, and attitudes toward risk-reducing surgical procedures among women in Israel who carried BRCA variants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized clinical trial had a 12-week intervention period and a 12-week follow-up period. It was conducted between April 1, 2017, and July 31, 2020. Participants were recruited from the Meirav Breast Center at the Sheba Medical Center, Israel, and the intervention was conducted in Tel Aviv, Israel. The cohort included women with BRCA variants. Data were analyzed from August 1 to December 1, 2020. INTERVENTIONS Women were randomly assigned to the 12-week IBSR program or standard care. The IBSR technique is based on the skills of mindfulness, inquiry, and cognitive reframing. The intervention included standardized, weekly group meetings conducted throughout 12 weeks. Standard care included semi-annual breast examinations and breast magnetic resonance imaging (alternating), a gynecological examination, a transvaginal ultrasonographic examination, and CA-125 serum determination. Differences between the groups were tested using mixed-effects models in an intent to treat analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was psychological well-being, including 6 parameters: autonomy, personal growth, positive relationships, control of the environment, goals in life, and self-acceptance. Secondary outcomes included sleep quality, attitudes toward risk-reducing surgical procedures, and psychosocial variables. Questionnaires were administered at baseline (T1), at completion of the 12-week intervention (T2), and 12 weeks after completion of the intervention (T3). RESULTS Overall, 100 women (mean [SD] age, 41.37 [11.06] years) completed the study, with 50 randomized to the intervention group and 50 randomized to the control group. Mean (SD) time from variant discovery was 4.7 (3.3) years. There were no differences between the intervention and control groups in baseline mean (SD) scores of psychological well-being parameters (autonomy: 55.20 [11.12] vs 56.77 [9.90]; environmental control: 56.30 [11.98 vs 58.51 [11.41]; positive relationships: 63.10 [15.91] vs 68.10 [9.86]; goals in life: 60.00 [14.12] vs 64.82 [10.57]; self-acceptance: 55.02 [16.62] vs 60.32 [13.50]) except personal growth (63.70 [14.66] vs 68.85 [8.07]). The IBSR group, compared with the control group, experienced better mean (SD) scores on all psychological well-being parameters at T2 (autonomy: 63.64 [8.35] vs 54.73 [10.41]; environmental control: 63.95 [10.05] vs 57.45 [11.43]; personal growth: 73.00 [8.34] vs 65.76 [10.95]; positive relationships 71.17 [9.99] vs 65.06 [12.58]; goals in life: 67.57 [8.88] vs 61.18 [12.87]; self-acceptance: 66.93 [11.15] vs 58.09 [15.55]) and at T3 (autonomy: 62.68 [9.05] vs 56.12 [10.64]; environmental control: 64.55 [10.28] vs 59.35 [12.98]; personal growth: 72.00 [8.06] vs 67.15 [11.82]; positive relationships: 71.24 [9.78] vs 66.92 [12.37]; goals in life: 68.33 [8.54] vs 62.92 [13.24]; self-acceptance: 66.84 [11.35] vs 58.97 [17.03]). Individuals in the IBSR group also experienced statistically significant improvements in sleep quality (mean [SD]: T1, 7.35 [3.97]; T3, 4.63 [3.21], P < .001), whereas the control group experienced no statistically significant difference. Women in the intervention group had a more favorable consideration of risk-reducing oophorectomy, from 7 women (14%) who refused to consider oophorectomy at T1 to 1 woman (2%) who refused to consider it at T3 (P = .04), and similar change in consideration of mastectomy: from 23 women (46%) who refused to consider mastectomy at T1 to 13 women (29%) who refused to consider it at T3 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This randomized clinical trial found that IBSR improved psychological well-being and led to a more favorable view on risk-reducing surgical procedures for at least 6 months among women in Israel who carried BRCA variants. These results suggest that IBSR may be implemented as a self-practice tool to enhance the well-being of individuals who carry BRCA variants and support them in their decision-making processes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03162276.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Landau
- Department of Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Anne Marie Novak
- Department of Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ariel B. Ganz
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Benjamin Rolnik
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Eitan Friedman
- Suzanne Levy-Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Shahar Lev-Ari
- Department of Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kotsopoulos J, Kim SJ, Armel S, Bordeleau L, Foulkes WD, McKinnon W, Panchal S, Cohen SA, Sun S, Sun P, McKetton L, Troyer AK, Narod SA. An evaluation of memory and attention in BRCA mutation carriers using an online cognitive assessment tool. Cancer 2021; 127:3183-3193. [PMID: 34077552 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of various surgical, hormonal, and lifestyle factors on memory and attention in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. METHODS BRCA mutation carriers enrolled in a longitudinal study were invited to complete an online brain health assessment tool designed to screen for cognitive deficits. Four measures of memory and executive attention were assessed individually, and an overall score was compiled adjusting for age. Exposures, including preventive surgery, hormone use, and lifestyle factors, were captured by questionnaire. Performance on each of the 5 subtasks was analyzed according to various exposures. Analysis of covariance was used to compare overall scores. RESULTS In total, 880 women completed the online cognitive assessment. The average age of the participants was 54 years (range, 23-86 years). The mean overall test score was 54.4 (range, 0-93). The individual subtask scores declined with age at test completion (P < .0001) and increased with level of education (P ≤ .01). Women who underwent a preventive oophorectomy had a significantly higher overall score compared with women who did not undergo this surgery (55.5 vs 50.5; P = .01). Reconstructive breast surgery was also associated with a higher overall score (56.5 vs 52.3; P = .005). Chemotherapy and hormone-replacement therapy were not predictive of the overall score. CONCLUSIONS These findings are reassuring to high-risk women who undergo early surgical menopause for their cancer predisposition. Further studies are needed to evaluate cognitive function over time when memory deficits become more prevalent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shana J Kim
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Armel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Louise Bordeleau
- Division of Medical Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Wendy McKinnon
- Familial Cancer Program, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Seema Panchal
- Marvelle Koffler Breast Center, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie A Cohen
- Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment Program, St Vincent Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Sophie Sun
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Angela K Troyer
- Neuropsychology and Cognitive Health Program, Baycrest Center for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Choi YH, Terry MB, Daly MB, MacInnis RJ, Hopper JL, Colonna S, Buys SS, Andrulis IL, John EM, Kurian AW, Briollais L. Association of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy With Breast Cancer Risk in Women With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:585-592. [PMID: 33630024 PMCID: PMC7907985 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are at high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancers. They usually undergo intensive cancer surveillance and may also consider surgical interventions, such as risk-reducing mastectomy or risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy has been shown to reduce ovarian cancer risk, but its association with breast cancer risk is less clear. OBJECTIVE To assess the association of RRSO with the risk of breast cancer in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This case series included families enrolled in the Breast Cancer Family Registry between 1996 and 2000 that carried an inherited pathogenic variant in BRCA1 (498 families) or BRCA2 (378 families). A survival analysis approach was used that was designed specifically to assess the time-varying association of RRSO with breast cancer risk and accounting for other potential biases. Data were analyzed from August 2019 to November 2020. EXPOSURE Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES In all analyses, the primary end point was the time to a first primary breast cancer. RESULTS A total of 876 families were evaluated, including 498 with BRCA1 (2650 individuals; mean [SD] event age, 55.8 [19.1] years; 437 White probands [87.8%]) and 378 with BRCA2 (1925 individuals; mean [SD] event age, 57.0 [18.6] years; 299 White probands [79.1%]). Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers within 5 years after surgery (hazard ratios [HRs], 0.28 [95% CI, 0.10-0.63] and 0.19 [95% CI, 0.06-0.71], respectively), whereas the corresponding HRs were weaker after 5 years postsurgery (HRs, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.38-0.97] and 0.99 [95% CI; 0.84-1.00], respectively). For BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers who underwent RRSO at age 40 years, the cause-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer was 49.7% (95% CI, 40.0-60.3) and 52.7% (95% CI, 47.9-58.7) by age 70 years, respectively, compared with 61.0% (95% CI, 56.7-66.0) and 54.0% (95% CI, 49.3-60.1), respectively, for women without RRSO. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Although the primary indication for RRSO is the prevention of ovarian cancer, it is also critical to assess its association with breast cancer risk in order to guide clinical decision-making about RRSO use and timing. The results of this case series suggest a reduced risk of breast cancer associated with RRSO in the immediate 5 years after surgery in women carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants, and a longer-term association with cumulative breast cancer risk in women carrying BRCA1 pathogenic variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun-Hee Choi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Mary B. Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert J. MacInnis
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - John L. Hopper
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sarah Colonna
- Department of Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City
| | - Saundra S. Buys
- Department of Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City
| | - Irene L. Andrulis
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Esther M. John
- Departments of Epidemiology & Population Health and of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Allison W. Kurian
- Departments of Epidemiology & Population Health and of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Laurent Briollais
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Crandall CJ, Diamant AL, Maglione M, Thurston RC, Sinsheimer J. Genetic Variation and Hot Flashes: A Systematic Review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020; 105:dgaa536. [PMID: 32797194 PMCID: PMC7538102 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Approximately 70% of women report experiencing vasomotor symptoms (VMS, hot flashes and/or night sweats). The etiology of VMS is not clearly understood but may include genetic factors. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched PubMed and Embase in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance. We included studies on associations between genetic variation and VMS. We excluded studies focused on medication interventions or prevention or treatment of breast cancer. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Of 202 unique citations, 18 citations met the inclusion criteria. Study sample sizes ranged from 51 to 17 695. Eleven of the 18 studies had fewer than 500 participants; 2 studies had 1000 or more. Overall, statistically significant associations with VMS were found for variants in 14 of the 26 genes assessed in candidate gene studies. The cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A member 1 (CYP1B1) gene was the focus of the largest number (n = 7) of studies, but strength and statistical significance of associations of CYP1B1 variants with VMS were inconsistent. A genome-wide association study reported statistically significant associations between 14 single-nucleotide variants in the tachykinin receptor 3 gene and VMS. Heterogeneity across trials regarding VMS measurement methods and effect measures precluded quantitative meta-analysis; there were few studies of each specific genetic variant. CONCLUSIONS Genetic variants are associated with VMS. The associations are not limited to variations in sex-steroid metabolism genes. However, studies were few and future studies are needed to confirm and extend these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn J Crandall
- David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Allison L Diamant
- David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Rebecca C Thurston
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine & Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Janet Sinsheimer
- David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Siyam T, Shivji A, Ross S, Eurich DT, Lavasanifar A, Yuksel N. Developing and evaluating a patient decision aid for hormone therapy to manage symptoms of surgical menopause: the story behind the "SheEmpowers" patient decision aid. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 28:157-166. [PMID: 33235034 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and evaluate an evidence-based patient decision aid (PDA) that can support women making decisions on hormone therapy (HT) for the management of early surgical menopause. METHODS The PDA development was guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and involved three phases: an exploratory phase to identify women's decisional needs; a development phase to identify evidence related to treatment options and draft initial prototype; and an evaluation phase to evaluate the prototype and elicit views on acceptability in women (N = 12). All phases were driven by a multidisciplinary group of researchers, clinicians, and patient stakeholders to ensure women's priorities were met. RESULTS A prototype PDA was drafted based on needs identified from the exploratory phase. The PDA has five domains: information on surgical menopause and HT; HT outcome probabilities; patient stories; values clarification; and guidance in deliberation. Participants in the evaluation phase perceived the tool as acceptable and offered suggestions for modifications. CONCLUSION Through our adopted, systematic approach the SheEmpowers PDA was developed to help women overcome deterrents to decision-making related to lack of knowledge, decision-making skills, and involvement in therapy decisions. The decisional effectiveness of the tool is to be assessed in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alisha Shivji
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Sue Ross
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Dean T Eurich
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Afsaneh Lavasanifar
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Nesé Yuksel
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Collins P, Maas A, Prasad M, Schierbeck L, Lerman A. Endothelial Vascular Function as a Surrogate of Vascular Risk and Aging in Women. Mayo Clin Proc 2020; 95:541-553. [PMID: 31982169 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in women. We suggest the need to develop a paradigm that connects sex- and age-specific nontraditional risk factors that serve as a common mechanism ultimately leading to an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Vascular injury with abnormal repair leading to functional, rather than structural, abnormalities can be regarded as accelerated vascular aging. It emerges as a common feature that can trigger the early diagnosis and risk stratification for cardiovascular disease in women. We discuss sex-specific risk factors that can contribute to vascular injury with age, and these might not always be considered by cardiovascular physicians. It is important for the primary physician to be aware of these risk factors to enable more intensified management of this at-risk population. Novel technologies that allow the assessment of vascular function noninvasively can serve as key diagnostic and therapeutic tools with which we can identify such individuals and target therapy to manage this important patient population appropriately and effectively. We hope that this article will stimulate interest in this field and encourage further research in these important areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Collins
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Angela Maas
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department Cardiology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Megha Prasad
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Amir Lerman
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stanisz M, Panczyk M, Kurzawa R, Grochans E. The Effect of Prophylactic Adnexectomy on the Quality of Life and Psychosocial Functioning of Women with the BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutations. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16244995. [PMID: 31818005 PMCID: PMC6950418 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16244995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The main purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) on the quality of life (QoL) and psychosocial functioning of patients with the BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. This survey-based study was conducted using the Blatt-Kupperman Index, the Women’s Health Questionnaire, the Perceived Stress Scale, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Beck Depression Inventory-II, and the authors’ questionnaire. All calculations were done using Statistica 13.3. The QoL after RRSO was statistically significantly lower in most domains compared with the state before surgery. The greatest decline in the QoL was observed in the vasomotor symptoms domain (d = 0.953) and the smallest in the memory/concentration domain (d = 0.167). We observed a statistically significant decrease in the level of anxiety as a state (d = 0.381), as well as a statistically significant increase in the severity of climacteric symptoms (d = 0.315) and depressive symptoms (d = 0.125). Prophylactic surgeries of the reproductive organs have a negative effect on the QoL and psychosocial functioning of women with the BRCA1/2 mutations, as they increase the severity of depressive and climacteric symptoms. At the same time, these surgeries reduce anxiety as a state, which may be associated with the elimination of cancerophobia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Stanisz
- Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Health, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland; (M.S.); (R.K.)
| | - Mariusz Panczyk
- Department of Education and Research in Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Rafał Kurzawa
- Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Health, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland; (M.S.); (R.K.)
- Center of Gynecology and Treatmemt for Infertility “Vitrolive”, al. Wojska Polskiego 103, 70-483 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Elżbieta Grochans
- Department of Nursing, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin; ul. Żołnierska 48, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-91-4800-910
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Reproductive and Hormonal Considerations in Women at Increased Risk for Hereditary Gynecologic Cancers: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine Evidence-Based Review. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 155:508-514. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
11
|
Chen LM, Blank SV, Burton E, Glass K, Penick E, Woodard T. Reproductive and hormonal considerations in women at increased risk for hereditary gynecologic cancers: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine Evidence-Based Review. Fertil Steril 2019; 112:1034-1042. [PMID: 31606136 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Providers who care for women at risk for hereditary gynecologic cancers must consider the impact of these conditions on reproductive and hormonal health. This document reviews potential options for cancer prevention, family building, genetic testing and management of surgical menopause in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee-May Chen
- University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.
| | - Stephanie V Blank
- Icahn and Blavatnik Family Women's Health Research Institute, New York, New York
| | | | - Karen Glass
- CReATe Fertility Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emily Penick
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Terri Woodard
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Deli T, Orosz M, Jakab A. Hormone Replacement Therapy in Cancer Survivors - Review of the Literature. Pathol Oncol Res 2019; 26:63-78. [PMID: 30617760 PMCID: PMC7109141 DOI: 10.1007/s12253-018-00569-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Rapid advance in oncology leads to increasing survival of oncologic patients. More and more of them live long enough to reach either the natural age of menopause or, as a side effect of their oncotherapy, experience the cessation of gonadal function, leading to premature ovarian insufficiency, with disturbing vasomotor symtoms and long-term negative cardiovascular and skeletal effects. Thus, an ever increasing number of cancer survivors search endocrinologic help in the form of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). The misinterpretation of the WHI (Women's Health Initiative) Study has lead to an irrational fear of female hormone replacement, both by the general population and medical professionals. It has seemed the logical and safe conclusion to many physicians to avoid HRT, supposing that this attitude definitely causes no harm, whereas the decision of prescribing estrogen alone or with progestins might bear oncologic and thromboembolic risks and may even lead to litigation in case of a potentially related complication. However, it was known even before the WHI results that premature menopause and hypogonadism decreases the life expectancy of women by years through its skeletal and cardiovascular effects, and this negative effect correlates with the length of the hypoestrogenaemic period. Therefore, the denial of HRT also needs to be supported by evidence and should be weighed againts the risks of HRT. Yet, the oncologic risk of HRT is extremely difficult to assess. In this work we review the latest evidence from in vitro experiments to clinical studies, regarding HRT in survivors of gynecologic and non-gynecologic cancers. Based on our literature research, we group tumours regarding the oncologic risk of properly chosen female hormone replacement therapy in cancer survivors as follows: ’HRT is advanageous’ (e.g. endometrial cancer type I, cervical adenocarcinoma, haematologic malignancies, local cutaneous malignant melanoma, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular cancer); ’HRT is neutral’ (e.g. BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers without cancer, endometrial cancer type II, uterinal carcinosarcoma and adenosarcoma, certain types of ovarian cancer, cervical, vaginal and vulvar squamous cell carcinoma, prolactinoma, kidney cancer, pancreatic cancer, thyroid cancer); ’HRT is relatively contraindicated’ for various reasons (e.g. leiomyosarcoma, certain types of ovarian tumours, brain tumours, advanced metastatic malignant melanoma, lung cancer, gastric cancer, bladder cancer); ’HRT is diasadvantageous and thus contraindicated’ (e.g. breast cancer, endometrial stroma sarcoma, meningioma, glioma, hormone receptor positive gastric and bladder cancer).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamás Deli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
| | - Mónika Orosz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Attila Jakab
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
González-Mariño MA. [Cost-effectiveness of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in cases of BRCA1 gene mutation in Colombia]. Rev Salud Publica (Bogota) 2018; 20:232-236. [PMID: 30570007 DOI: 10.15446/rsap.v20n2.64866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2017] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the usefulness of risk reduction salpingo-oophorectomy in cases with mutation of the BRCA1 gene in Colombia. MATERIAL AND METHODS Cost-effectiveness analysis in which three processes are incorporated: a. Patients with screening tests for breast and ovarian cancer. b. Risk reduction surgery in the fallopian tubes and ovaries c. Reductive surgery in the fallopian tubes and ovaries with bilateral mastectomy. The outcome is evaluated as the gain in years of survival. RESULTS The cohort with risk reduction surgery in the fallopian tubes and ovaries and bilateral mastectomy is the one with the highest gain with 13 years, while the risk reduction surgery in the fallopian tubes and ovaries gain 4.95 years with respect to the follow-up group. CONCLUSIONS The three options evaluated are acceptable, but of them the one with the greatest gain in survival is the combination of risk-reducing surgery in the fallopian tubes and ovaries with bilateral mastectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario A González-Mariño
- MG: MD. M. Sc. Senología y Patología Mamaria. Ph. D. Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Budiana ING, Angelina M, Pemayun TGA. Ovarian cancer: Pathogenesis and current recommendations for prophylactic surgery. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2018; 20:47-54. [PMID: 30362670 PMCID: PMC6501866 DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is one of the most common gynecologic cancers, and one of the leading causes of cancer-associated female mortality in the world. Currently, no widely accepted pathogenesis is available, which may explain the entire disease. Early detection and primary prevention of ovarian cancer are difficult, mostly due to its heterogeneous nature. Risk factor modification based on epidemiologic data has not significantly reduced the incidence of ovarian cancer. Currently, prophylactic surgical methods have been proposed as the most effective preventive measures for both the high-risk or low-risk populations. Understanding the existing pathogenesis theories and the surgical options available may alter physician’s perspectives and facilitate better decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Nyoman Gede Budiana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Udayana University Sanglah General Hospital Faculty of Medicine, Bali, Indonesia
| | - Michelle Angelina
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Udayana University Sanglah General Hospital Faculty of Medicine, Bali, Indonesia
| | - Tjokorda Gede Astawa Pemayun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Udayana University Sanglah General Hospital Faculty of Medicine, Bali, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Casey MJ, Salzman TA. Reducing the Risk of Gynecologic Cancer in Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer Syndrome Mutation Carriers: Moral Dilemmas and the Principle of Double Effect. LINACRE QUARTERLY 2018; 85:225-240. [PMID: 30275608 PMCID: PMC6161234 DOI: 10.1177/0024363918788340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome is an autosomal dominant disease linked to mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 90 percent of affected families. Female mutation carriers are highly susceptible to aggressive, often disseminated, usually fatal pelvic-abdominal carcinomatosis. This cancer risk can be markedly reduced by surgical removal of the internal gynecologic organs before the end of the fourth decade of life and by using estrogen-progestin formulations marketed for many years as combined oral contraceptives (COCs). Both risk-reducing methods are associated with unfavorable effects. Relying on the principle of double effect, this essay argues for the ethical justification of prophylactic surgery and the use of COC to reduce the risk of gynecologic cancer in HBOC syndrome mutation carriers. Summary: Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome is an autosomal dominant disease linked to mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in most affected families. Female mutation carriers are highly susceptible to aggressive, often disseminated, usually fatal pelvic-abdominal carcinomatosis. This cancer risk can be markedly reduced by surgical removal of the internal gynecologic organs before the end of the fourth decade of life and by using estrogen-progestin formulations marketed for many years as combined oral contraceptives. Both risk-reducing methods are associated with unfavorable effects. Relying on the principle of double effect, this essay argues for the ethical justification for those unfavorable effects.
Collapse
|
16
|
Bone loss after oophorectomy among high-risk women: an NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study. Menopause 2018; 23:1228-1232. [PMID: 27433858 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000000692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Women undergoing premenopausal oophorectomy for a variety of reasons, including to reduce ovarian or breast cancer risk were evaluated for accelerated bone loss. METHODS The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-0215 randomized phase-II trial of zoledronic acid was initiated to determine if postoophorectomy bisphosphonate therapy could prevent this bone loss. The study was closed after slow accrual prevented evaluation of the primary study endpoint. We analyzed changes in bone mineral density (BMD) among the 80 women randomized to the observation arm of this study, as measured 3, 9, and 18 months postenrollment. RESULTS The mean change in BMD from baseline to 18 months was -0.09 (95% CI, -0.12 to -0.07), -0.05 (95% CI, -0.07 to -0.03), and -0.06 (95% CI, -0.07 to -0.05) g/cm across the lumbar spine, right hip, and left hip, respectively. This represents a BMD decrease of -8.5% for the lumbar spine and -5.7% for both the right and left hips from baseline to 18 months' observation. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate that premenopausal women undergoing oophorectomy clearly experience bone loss, an adverse effect of oophorectomy, which requires attention and active management. BMD should be monitored postoophorectomy, and treated per standard practice guidelines. Future studies will be required to determine if early treatment can mitigate fracture risk, and to test promising therapeutic interventions and novel prevention strategies, such as increased physical activity or alternative medications, in randomized trials.
Collapse
|
17
|
Harmsen MG, Steenbeek MP, Hoogerbrugge N, van Doorn HC, Gaarenstroom KN, Vos MC, Massuger LFAG, de Hullu JA, Hermens RPMG. A patient decision aid for risk-reducing surgery in premenopausal BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: Development process and pilot testing. Health Expect 2017; 21:659-667. [PMID: 29281161 PMCID: PMC5980589 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background BRCA1/2 mutation carriers’ choice between risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy (RRSO) and salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy is very complex. Aim was to develop a patient decision aid that combines evidence with patient preferences to facilitate decision making. Design Systematic development of a patient decision aid in an iterative process of prototype development, alpha testing by patients and clinicians and revisions using International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) quality criteria. Information was based on the available literature and current guidelines. A multidisciplinary steering group supervised the process. Setting and participants Pre‐menopausal BRCA1/2 mutation carriers choosing between RRSO and salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy in Family Cancer Clinics in the Netherlands. Main outcome measures IPDAS quality criteria, relevance, usability, clarity. Results The patient decision aid underwent four rounds of alpha testing and revisions. Finally, two paper decision aids were developed: one for BRCA1 and one for BRCA2. They both contained a general introduction, three chapters and a step‐by‐step plan containing a personal value clarification worksheet. During alpha testing, risk communication and information about premature menopause and hormone therapy were the most revised items. The patient decision aids fulfil 37 of 43 (86%) IPDAS criteria for content and development process. Discussion and conclusions Both BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and professionals are willing to use or offer the developed patient decision aids for risk‐reducing surgery. The patient decision aids have been found clear, balanced and comprehensible. Future testing among patients facing the decision should point out its effectiveness in improving decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marline G Harmsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda P Steenbeek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Helena C van Doorn
- Department of Gynaecology, Erasmus MC Cancer Clinic, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katja N Gaarenstroom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M Caroline Vos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lin W, Titus S, Moy F, Ginsburg ES, Oktay K. Ovarian Aging in Women With BRCA Germline Mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017; 102:3839-3847. [PMID: 28938488 PMCID: PMC5630253 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2017-00765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Accepted: 08/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Recent clinical and laboratory studies suggested that women with BRCA mutations have lower ovarian reserve and their primordial follicle oocytes may be more prone to DNA damage; however, direct proof is lacking. OBJECTIVE To determine whether women with germline BRCA mutations have reduced primordial follicle reserve and increased oocyte DNA damage. DESIGN A comparative laboratory study of ovarian tissue obtained from unaffected BRCA mutation carriers (BMCs) vs age-matched organ donor cadavers. SETTING Two academic centers. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS Of the 230 ovarian specimens from BMCs, 18 met the study inclusion criteria. Healthy ovaries from 12 organ donor cadavers served as controls. INTERVENTION Histology and immunohistochemical analysis on paraffin-embedded ovarian sections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Primordial follicle density and the percentage of DNA double-strand break (DSB)-positive primordial follicle oocytes. RESULTS Ovaries from BMCs had significantly lower primordial follicle densities than those of controls (11.2 ± 2.0 vs 44.2 ± 6.2 follicles/mm3; P = 0.0002). BRCA mutations were associated with increased DNA DSBs in primordial follicle oocytes (62% ± 5.2% vs 36% ± 3.4%; P = 0.0005). In subgroup analyses, both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were associated with lower primordial follicle density (P = 0.0001 and 0.0030, respectively), and BRCA1 mutations were associated with higher DNA DSBs (P = 0.0003) than controls. The rates of follicle decline (R2 = 0.74; P = 0.0001) and DNA DSB accumulation (R2 = 0.70; P = 0.0001) appeared to be accelerated, particularly in primordial follicle oocytes of BMCs over age 30 years. CONCLUSIONS We provide direct evidence of diminished ovarian reserve as well as accelerated primordial follicle loss and oocyte DNA damage in women with BRCA mutations. These findings may further our understanding of ovarian aging, and be useful when counseling BMCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wayne Lin
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| | - Shiny Titus
- Laboratory of Molecular Reproduction and Fertility Preservation, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510
| | - Fred Moy
- Department of Biostatistics, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York 10595
| | - Elizabeth S. Ginsburg
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| | - Kutluk Oktay
- Laboratory of Molecular Reproduction and Fertility Preservation, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
De Felice F, Marchetti C, Boccia SM, Romito A, Sassu CM, Porpora MG, Muzii L, Tombolini V, Benedetti Panici P. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutated patients: An evidence-based approach on what women should know. Cancer Treat Rev 2017; 61:1-5. [PMID: 29028552 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Revised: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This review is focused on the ovarian cancer risk reduction management in BRCA mutation carriers and is intended to assist with clinical decision-making. Obviously, treatment decisions must be based on the available evidence. Despite risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is firmly recommended, several separate questions can be raised to address the variety of intense controversy of this approach. A special emphasis lies in the effective preventive surgical measure against ovarian cancer risk, in an attempt to detect the optimal timing and mitigate the impact on patients. The long term implications of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy as well as hormone replacement therapy are also actively debated. This is expected to represent an opportunity for improved management modelling of BRCA mutated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - C Marchetti
- Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - S M Boccia
- Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - A Romito
- Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - C M Sassu
- Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - M G Porpora
- Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - L Muzii
- Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - V Tombolini
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - P Benedetti Panici
- Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Müllerian intra-abdominal carcinomatosis in hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome: implications for risk-reducing surgery. Fam Cancer 2017; 15:371-84. [PMID: 26875157 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9878-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
More than 40 years ago Lynch et al. described several multigenerational breast cancer family pedigrees which demonstrated autosomal dominant inheritance of a trait(s) that increased risks for both breast and ovarian cancers. Mutation carriers in at least 90 % of these hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome families have been linked to cancer-associated mutations in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. This review focuses on the contributions of Lynch, colleagues and collaborators and pertinent literature, toward defining the HBOC syndrome, the cancer risks that the inherited adverse mutations convey, the gynecologic tissues and organs from which the malignancy may arise to disseminate throughout the pelvic and abdominal organs and peritoneum and how this information can be used to reduce the risk and morbidities of intra-abdominal carcinomatosis in effected individuals.
Collapse
|
21
|
Webber L, Anderson RA, Davies M, Janse F, Vermeulen N. HRT for women with premature ovarian insufficiency: a comprehensive review. Hum Reprod Open 2017; 2017:hox007. [PMID: 30895225 PMCID: PMC6276684 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hox007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2016] [Revised: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), often and misleadingly referred to as ‘premature menopause’, is defined as a loss of ovarian activity before the age of 40 years and is characterized by irregular or absent periods and reduced fertility. Symptoms include those associated with the natural menopause (night sweats and vaginal dryness), and with the long-term adverse effects of estrogen deficiency (osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease): the latter is believed to explain the shorter life expectancy associated with POI. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The objective of the current review was to collect all relevant studies supporting recommendations on the indications, treatment options, and risks of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (estrogen, progestogens and androgens) for women with POI. SEARCH METHODS The current review was written based on the best available evidence on the topic collected for the recently published ESHRE guideline on the management of women with POI. PUBMED/MEDLINE and the Cochrane library were searched in a stepwise approach. Relevant references were summarized in evidence tables, with assessment of the quality. OUTCOMES HRT is strongly recommended for women with POI, mainly for vasomotor and genito-urinary symptom relief. In addition, HRT has been shown to have a role in bone protection and probably also in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. There is little evidence on the optimal type, regimen and dose of HRT; patient preference for route and method of administration of each component of HRT must be considered when prescribing, as should contraceptive needs. In women with POI, physiological replacement of estrogen (and progesterone) is essential for their health, and the controversies that surround the use of HRT in postmenopausal women do not apply. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION N/A. WIDER IMPLICATIONS New areas of study on HRT for women with POI should focus on life expectancy, quality of life and neurological function. Furthermore, randomized controlled trials comparing transdermal estradiol with oral estrogens with regard to efficacy, patient satisfaction and side effects are urgently needed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS The authors received no funding for the review. The costs for the development of the ESHRE guideline were covered by ESHRE. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Webber
- Department of Women's Health, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK
| | - Melanie Davies
- Department of Women's Health, University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Femi Janse
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Nathalie Vermeulen
- European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), Grimbergen B-1852, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Johansen N, Liavaag AH, Iversen OE, Dørum A, Braaten T, Michelsen TM. Use of hormone replacement therapy after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017; 96:547-555. [PMID: 28236297 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Accepted: 02/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION After premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to prevent ovarian cancer, the non-cancer-related morbidity and mortality may be increased if sex hormones are not replaced. Several guidelines recommend systemic hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to these women until the expected age of menopause. We aimed to study the use of HRT after RRSO. MATERIAL AND METHODS Participants were 324 women after RRSO and 11 160 postmenopausal controls. A subsample of 950 controls had undergone bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). All participants completed the same questionnaire regarding HRT use. We compared HRT use in the RRSO group with the BSO controls using logistic regression. RESULTS Among the women aged ≤52 years without a history of breast cancer, 51.7% of the RRSO group and 48.7% of the BSO controls reported current use of systemic HRT (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.76). Among the HRT users, systemic estrogen was used by 35.1% and 58.7% in the RRSO and BSO control groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Among the women aged >52 years, 16.8% of the RRSO group and 38.4% of the BSO controls (p < 0.001) used systemic HRT. CONCLUSIONS Among the RRSO women and BSO controls ≤52 years old without a history of breast cancer, relatively few were current users. If there are no contraindications, these women would benefit from systemic HRT. Additionally, almost 40% of the BSO controls >52 years used systemic HRT. Doctors should be aware of this practice and prescribe systemic HRT when indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Johansen
- Department of Gynecology, Sørlandet Hospital Arendal, Arendal, Norway.,Research Unit, Sørlandet Hospital, Arendal, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Astrid H Liavaag
- Department of Gynecology, Sørlandet Hospital Arendal, Arendal, Norway.,Research Unit, Sørlandet Hospital, Arendal, Norway
| | - Ole-Erik Iversen
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Anne Dørum
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tonje Braaten
- Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Trond M Michelsen
- Research Unit, Sørlandet Hospital, Arendal, Norway.,Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Obstetrics, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Women's Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
A Psychological Perspective on Factors Predicting Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy in a Sample of Italian Women from the General Population. Results from a Hypothetical Study in the Context of BRCA Mutations. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:1144-1152. [PMID: 28337671 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0093-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 03/06/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess attitudes toward ovarian cancer risk management options for BRCA mutation carriers in healthy Italian women, and to identify predictors of the preference for risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) over surveillance. One hundred eighty-one women aged 30-45 completed a questionnaire about preferences, knowledge, risk perception, and socio-demographic information. Participants were randomly presented with a pamphlet about BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation-specific testing, consequences of testing and preventive options for carriers, and they were stratified by having children or not and by age group. Surveillance was the preferred option (64.6%), followed by RRSO (24.3%). Although RRSO is the only effective strategy available to BRCA carriers, most healthy women faced for the first time with this option may not consider it as their preferred choice. Predictors associated with a higher likelihood to prefer surgery over surveillance were: knowing that life expectancy is longer with surgery, perceived comprehension of the consequences of testing, previous knowledge about BRCA testing, anticipated worry about developing cancer, and feelings of risk. Childbearing intentions and the effect of childbearing intentions on choice were associated with a lower preference for surgery. Further research is needed to confirm the role of the factors identified in this study in order to promote informed decision-making about RRSO.
Collapse
|
24
|
Kotsopoulos J, Huzarski T, Gronwald J, Singer CF, Moller P, Lynch HT, Armel S, Karlan B, Foulkes WD, Neuhausen SL, Senter L, Tung N, Weitzel JN, Eisen A, Metcalfe K, Eng C, Pal T, Evans G, Sun P, Lubinski J, Narod SA. Bilateral Oophorectomy and Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017; 109:2905636. [PMID: 27601060 PMCID: PMC6284253 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djw177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2016] [Revised: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 06/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Whether oophorectomy reduces breast cancer risk among BRCA mutation carriers is a matter of debate. We undertook a prospective analysis of bilateral oophorectomy and breast cancer risk in BRCA mutation carriers. Methods Subjects had no history of cancer, had both breasts intact, and had information on oophorectomy status (n = 3722). Women were followed until breast cancer diagnosis, prophylactic bilateral mastectomy, or death. A Cox regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of breast cancer associated with oophorectomy (coded as a time-dependent variable). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Over a mean follow-up of 5.6 years, 350 new breast cancers were diagnosed. Among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, oophorectomy was not associated with breast cancer risk compared with women who did not undergo an oophorectomy. The age-adjusted hazard ratio associated with oophorectomy was 0.96 (95% CI = 0.73 to 1.26, P = 76) for BRCA1 and was 0.65 (95% CI = 0.37 to 1.16, P = 14) for BRCA2 mutation carriers. In stratified analyses, the effect of oophorectomy was statistically significant for breast cancer in BRCA2 mutation carriers diagnosed prior to age 50 years (age-adjusted HR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.63, P = 007). Oophorectomy was not associated with risk of breast cancer prior to age 50 years among BRCA1 mutation carriers (age-adjusted HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.55 to 1.13, P = 51). Conclusions Findings from this large prospective study support a role of oophorectomy for the prevention of premenopausal breast cancer in BRCA2, but not BRCA1 mutation carriers. These findings warrant further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pal Moller
- Department for Medical Genetics, Inherited Cancer Research Group, and Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Henry T Lynch
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Susan Armel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Beth Karlan
- Gynecology Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - William D Foulkes
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Andrea Eisen
- Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Charis Eng
- Genomic Medicine Institute and Center for Personalized Genetic Healthcare, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Tuya Pal
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Departments of Cancer Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Anatomic Pathology, and Experimental Therapeutics, Tampa, FL
| | - Gareth Evans
- Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (GE)
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jan Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Atema V, van Leeuwen M, Oldenburg HSA, Retèl V, van Beurden M, Hunter MS, Aaronson NK. Design of a randomized controlled trial of Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for treatment-induced menopausal symptoms in breast cancer survivors. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:920. [PMID: 27887581 PMCID: PMC5124313 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2946-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2016] [Accepted: 11/10/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Menopausal symptoms are common and may be particularly severe in younger women who undergo treatment-induced menopause. Medications to reduce menopausal symptoms are either contra-indicated or have bothersome side effects. Previous studies have demonstrated that face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective in alleviating menopausal symptoms in women with breast cancer. However, compliance with face-to-face CBT programs can be problematic. A promising approach is to use the Internet to make this form of CBT more accessible and feasible for patients. This study is evaluating the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an Internet-based CBT program, with or without therapist guidance, in alleviating or reducing the severity of menopausal symptoms. METHODS/DESIGN In a multicenter, randomized controlled trial we are evaluating the efficacy of two Internet-based CBT programs in alleviating or reducing the impact of menopausal symptoms, and particularly hot flushes and night sweats, in breast cancer survivors who have experienced a treatment-induced menopause. Secondary outcomes include sexual functioning, sleep quality, hot flush frequency, psychological distress, health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness. We will recruit 248 women who will be randomized to either a therapist guided or a self-management version of the 6-week Internet-based CBT program, or to a usual care, waiting list control group. Self-administered questionnaires are completed at baseline (T0), and at 10 weeks (T1) and 24 weeks (T2) post-randomization. DISCUSSION Internet-based CBT is a potentially useful treatment for reducing menopausal symptoms in breast cancer survivors. This study will provide evidence on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of such an Internet-based CBT program, with or without therapist support. If demonstrated to be efficacious and cost-effective, the availability of such structured supportive intervention programs will be a welcome addition to standard medical treatment offered to cancer patients with treatment-induced menopause. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study is retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on January 26th 2016 ( NCT02672189 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Atema
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester S. A. Oldenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valesca Retèl
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of HTSR, School of Governance and Management, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Marc van Beurden
- Department of Gynecology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Myra S. Hunter
- Department of Psychology (at Guy’s), Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, 5th floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy’s Campus, SE1 9RT London, UK
| | - Neil K. Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Botesteanu DA, Lipkowitz S, Lee JM, Levy D. Mathematical models of breast and ovarian cancers. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-SYSTEMS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2016; 8:337-62. [PMID: 27259061 DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2016] [Revised: 04/13/2016] [Accepted: 04/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Women constitute the majority of the aging United States (US) population, and this has substantial implications on cancer population patterns and management practices. Breast cancer is the most common women's malignancy, while ovarian cancer is the most fatal gynecological malignancy in the US. In this review, we focus on these subsets of women's cancers, seen more commonly in postmenopausal and elderly women. In order to systematically investigate the complexity of cancer progression and response to treatment in breast and ovarian malignancies, we assert that integrated mathematical modeling frameworks viewed from a systems biology perspective are needed. Such integrated frameworks could offer innovative contributions to the clinical women's cancers community, as answers to clinical questions cannot always be reached with contemporary clinical and experimental tools. Here, we recapitulate clinically known data regarding the progression and treatment of the breast and ovarian cancers. We compare and contrast the two malignancies whenever possible in order to emphasize areas where substantial contributions could be made by clinically inspired and validated mathematical modeling. We show how current paradigms in the mathematical oncology community focusing on the two malignancies do not make comprehensive use of, nor substantially reflect existing clinical data, and we highlight the modeling areas in most critical need of clinical data integration. We emphasize that the primary goal of any mathematical study of women's cancers should be to address clinically relevant questions. WIREs Syst Biol Med 2016, 8:337-362. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1343 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana-Adriana Botesteanu
- Department of Mathematics and Center for Scientific Computation and Mathematical Modeling (CSCAMM), University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.,Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stanley Lipkowitz
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jung-Min Lee
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Doron Levy
- Department of Mathematics and Center for Scientific Computation and Mathematical Modeling (CSCAMM), University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hormone replacement therapy after menopause and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers: a case–control study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 155:365-73. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3685-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2016] [Accepted: 01/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
28
|
Perets R, Drapkin R. It's Totally Tubular....Riding The New Wave of Ovarian Cancer Research. Cancer Res 2015; 76:10-7. [PMID: 26669862 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-1382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2015] [Accepted: 09/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome carries significant mortality for young women if effective preventive and screening measures are not taken. Preventive salpingo-oophorectomy is currently the only method known to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer-related death. Histopathological analyses of these surgical specimens indicate that a high proportion of ovarian cancers in women at high risk and in the general population arise from the fallopian tube. This paradigm shift concerning the cell of origin for the most common subtype of ovarian cancer, high-grade serous carcinoma, has sparked a major effort within the research community to develop new and robust model systems to study the fallopian tube epithelium as the cell of origin of "ovarian" cancer. In this review, evidence supporting the fallopian tube as the origin of ovarian cancer is presented as are novel experimental model systems for studying the fallopian tube epithelium in high-risk women as well as in the general population. This review also addresses the clinical implications of the newly proposed cell of origin, the clinical questions that arise, and novel strategies for ovarian cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Perets
- Division of Oncology, Clinical Research Institute at Rambam, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
| | - Ronny Drapkin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ovarian Cancer Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Moorman PG. Should women at high risk for cancer use oral contraceptive pills? Per Med 2015; 12:533-535. [PMID: 29750608 DOI: 10.2217/pme.15.36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia G Moorman
- Cancer Control & Population Sciences, Department of Community & Family Medicine, Box 2715, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Incidence of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) by algorithm classification in serous ovarian tumor associated with PAX8 expression in tubal epithelia: a study of single institution in Japan. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2015; 34:9-18. [PMID: 25473747 PMCID: PMC4272227 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Serous ovarian carcinoma is now hypothesized to originate from fallopian tube epithelium (FTE). We investigated the FTE abnormalities in the patients with epithelial ovarian tumors. Our study included 55 cases of serous tumors (24 carcinomas, 8 borderline tumors, and 23 adenomas), 14 mucinous carcinomas, 22 endometrioid carcinomas, 5 clear cell carcinomas, and 2 malignant Brenner tumors. FTE was diagnosed by the diagnostic algorithm, which combines the data of morphology, and p53, Ki-67 immunostaining, as serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma, serous tubal intraepithelial lesion, p53 signature, and normal/reactive. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma, serous tubal intraepithelial lesion, p53 signature, and normal/reactive were observed in 5, 3, 0, and 16 cases in serous carcinoma; 0, 3, 0, and 5 cases in serous borderline tumor; 0, 1, 1, and 21 cases in serous adenoma; 0, 0, 1, and 13 cases in mucinous carcinoma; 0, 0, 3, and 19 cases in endometrioid carcinoma; 0, 0, 0, and 5 cases in clear cell carcinoma; and 0, 1, 0, and 1 case in malignant Brenner tumor. Among tumors of serous histology and between carcinomas, FTE abnormalities differed significantly (P<0.05). Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas were only found in serous carcinoma. The incidence of secretory cell proliferation (SCP) was examined by PAX8 expression. The rate of SCP was extremely high in serous carcinoma (96%). Among tumors of serous histology and between carcinomas, an incidence of SCP differed significantly (P<0.05). Patients with SCP were significantly older (P<0.0001). Our observations were concordant with the hypothesis of serous ovarian carcinogenesis. The SCP has a meaningful association with serous ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
31
|
Kotsopoulos J, Lubinski J, Neuhausen SL, Gronwald J, Lynch HT, Huzarski T, Demsky R, Foulkes WD, Senter L, Friedman S, Ainsworth P, Sun P, Narod SA. Weight gain after oophorectomy among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 11:453-9. [PMID: 26258912 DOI: 10.2217/whe.15.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM To measure weight gain among unaffected women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation after undergoing an oophorectomy. PATIENTS & METHODS We compared the bodyweight of women with (n = 405) and without an oophorectomy (n = 741) at baseline as well as the rate of weight change prior to and following surgery among 1454 BRCA mutation carriers who had an oophorectomy. RESULTS There was a small and non-significant difference in bodyweight between BRCA mutation carriers who had an oophorectomy compared with those women who did not (151.5 vs 149.1 pounds; p = 0.26). There was an increase in bodyweight with increasing age, but this relationship did not differ prior to and following surgery (p comparing the slope parameters = 0.78). CONCLUSION Oophorectomy is not associated with significant weight gain in high-risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, 790 Bay Street, Room 750, Toronto, ON, M5G 1N8, Canada
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Henry T Lynch
- Department of Preventive Medicine & Public Health, Creighton University School of Medicine, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Rochelle Demsky
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, 123 Edward St, Toronto, ON, M5G 1E2, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology & Human Genetics, McGill University, 3755 Côte Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Susan Friedman
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Departments of Cancer Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Anatomic Pathology, & Experimental Therapeutics, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Peter Ainsworth
- London Regional Cancer Program, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, 790 Bay Street, Room 750, Toronto, ON, M5G 1N8, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, 790 Bay Street, Room 750, Toronto, ON, M5G 1N8, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Angioni S, Pontis A, Sedda F, Zampetoglou T, Cela V, Mereu L, Litta P. Single-port versus conventional multiport access prophylactic laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients for ovarian cancer: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Onco Targets Ther 2015; 8:1575-80. [PMID: 26170692 PMCID: PMC4485856 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s82570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is widely recommended as part of a risk-reduction strategy for ovarian or breast cancer due to an underlying genetic predisposition. BSO is also performed as a therapeutic intervention for patients with hormone-positive premenopausal breast cancer. BSO may be performed via a minimally invasive approach with the use of three to four 5 mm and/or 12 mm ports inserted through a skin incision. To further reduce the morbidity associated with the placement of multiple port sites and to improve cosmetic outcomes, single-port laparoscopy has been developed with a single access point from the umbilicus. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes associated with reducing the risks of salpingo-oophorectomy performed in a single port, while comparing multiport laparoscopy in women with a high risk for ovarian cancer. Single-port laparoscopy-BSO is feasible and safe, with favorable surgical and cosmetic outcomes when compared to conventional laparoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Angioni
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pontis
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Federica Sedda
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Vito Cela
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Litta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Maclaran K, Panay N. Current Concepts in Premature Ovarian Insufficiency. WOMENS HEALTH 2015; 11:169-82. [PMID: 25776291 DOI: 10.2217/whe.14.82] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is a life-changing diagnosis, with profound physical and psychological consequences. Unfortunately, there are many deficiencies in our understanding of the condition as the underlying etiology and optimum management strategies are poorly understood. Improved awareness of POI and its long-term implications has led to increased research interest in recent years. Current research has allowed a greater understanding of the changing epidemiology in POI, genetic factors in its etiology and randomized controlled trials of hormone therapy are underway to provide evidence for treatment. This article reviews the latest literature on POI to summarize current understanding and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Maclaran
- West Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, Twickenham Road, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 6AF, UK
| | - Nick Panay
- Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea and Chelsea & Westminster Hospitals, West London Menopause & PMS Centre, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Marchetti C, De Felice F, Palaia I, Perniola G, Musella A, Musio D, Muzii L, Tombolini V, Panici PB. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a meta-analysis on impact on ovarian cancer risk and all cause mortality in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers. BMC WOMENS HEALTH 2014; 14:150. [PMID: 25494812 PMCID: PMC4271468 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-014-0150-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2014] [Accepted: 11/12/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background Women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are at substantially elevated risk of developing ovarian cancer. The aim of the meta-analysis is to clarify the role of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to reduce ovarian cancer risk and mortality in women with BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers. Methods Pubmed, Medline and Scopus were searched to select English-language articles. Two investigators independently extracted characteristics and results of selected studies. Articles were included only if prospective and if absolute numbers of ovarian cancer and death events were available or derivable from the test. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using fixed effects model. Results Meta-analysis of 3 prospective studies demonstrated a significant risk reduction of ovarian cancer with RRSO in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers, as well as benefit in all-causes mortality incidence. Conclusions It may be justified to recommend RRSO to reduce ovarian cancer risk and all-causes mortality in women with a mutation in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Marchetti
- Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, University of Rome 2"Sapienza", Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 326, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Innocenza Palaia
- Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, University of Rome 2"Sapienza", Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Giorgia Perniola
- Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, University of Rome 2"Sapienza", Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Angela Musella
- Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, University of Rome 2"Sapienza", Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Daniela Musio
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 326, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, University of Rome 2"Sapienza", Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 326, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
- Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, University of Rome 2"Sapienza", Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Perrone AM, Pozzati F, Santini D, Rossi M, Procaccini M, Casalini L, Santi E, Tesei M, Zamagni C, Iaco PD. Gynecological malignancies and hormonal therapies: Clinical management and recommendations. World J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 3:162-170. [DOI: 10.5317/wjog.v3.i4.162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2014] [Revised: 05/15/2014] [Accepted: 09/10/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Every year in the world a large number of women receive a diagnosis of gynecological cancer and undergo a therapy such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy to the pelvic region. A large portion of these patients are already in menopause, but for younger patients therapies are responsible of early menopause. The physical and psychological symptoms due to iatrogenic menopause significantly reduce the quality of life; however hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has a high efficacy in reducing menopausal symptoms. The prescription of HRT in patients with story of gynecological cancer is debated because its safety has not been completely proven. The main criticism is based on the theory that the hormone replacement could stimulate growth of residual cancer cells increasing the risk of recurrence.
Collapse
|
36
|
Kan CWS, Howell VM, Hahn MA, Marsh DJ. Genomic alterations as mediators of miRNA dysregulation in ovarian cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2014; 54:1-19. [PMID: 25280227 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2014] [Accepted: 09/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Serous epithelial ovarian cancer (SEOC) is the most common and aggressive histological subtype. Widespread genomic alterations go hand-in-hand with aberrant DNA damage signaling and are a hallmark of high-grade SEOC. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small noncoding RNA molecules that are nonrandomly distributed in the genome. They are frequently located in chromosomal regions susceptible to copy number variation (CNV) associated with malignancy that can influence their expression. Widespread changes in miRNA expression have been reported in multiple cancer types including ovarian cancer. This review examines CNV and single nucleotide polymorphisms, two common types of genomic alterations that occur in ovarian cancer, in the context of their influence on the expression of miRNA and the ability of miRNA to bind to and regulate their target genes. This includes genes encoding proteins involved in DNA repair and the maintenance of genomic stability. Improved understanding of mechanisms of miRNA dysregulation and the role of miRNA in ovarian cancer will provide further insight into the pathogenesis and treatment of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casina W S Kan
- Hormones and Cancer Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Song H, Cicek MS, Dicks E, Harrington P, Ramus SJ, Cunningham JM, Fridley BL, Tyrer JP, Alsop J, Jimenez-Linan M, Gayther SA, Goode EL, Pharoah PDP. The contribution of deleterious germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 and the mismatch repair genes to ovarian cancer in the population. Hum Mol Genet 2014; 23:4703-9. [PMID: 24728189 PMCID: PMC4119409 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2013] [Revised: 04/02/2014] [Accepted: 04/08/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to estimate the contribution of deleterious mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 to invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in the population. The coding sequence and splice site boundaries of all six genes were amplified in germline DNA from 2240 invasive EOC cases and 1535 controls. Barcoded fragment libraries were sequenced using the Illumina GAII or HiSeq and sequence data for each subject de-multiplexed prior to interpretation. GATK and Annovar were used for variant detection and annotation. After quality control 2222 cases (99.2%) and 1528 controls (99.5%) were included in the final analysis. We identified 193 EOC cases (8.7%) carrying a deleterious mutation in at least one gene compared with 10 controls (0.65%). Mutations were most frequent in BRCA1 and BRCA2, with 84 EOC cases (3.8%) carrying a BRCA1 mutation and 94 EOC cases (4.2%) carrying a BRCA2 mutation. The combined BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation prevalence was 11% in high-grade serous disease. Seventeen EOC cases carried a mutation in a mismatch repair gene, including 10 MSH6 mutation carriers (0.45%) and 4 MSH2 mutation carriers (0.18%). At least 1 in 10 women with high-grade serous EOC has a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. The development of next generation sequencing technologies enables rapid mutation screening for multiple susceptibility genes at once, suggesting that routine clinical testing of all incidence cases should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honglin Song
- CR-UK Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK,
| | - Mine S Cicek
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ed Dicks
- CR-UK Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Patricia Harrington
- CR-UK Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Susan J Ramus
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| | | | - Brooke L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas, USA and
| | - Jonathan P Tyrer
- CR-UK Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- CR-UK Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Simon A Gayther
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- CR-UK Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
BRCA-associated ovarian cancer: from molecular genetics to risk management. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2014; 2014:787143. [PMID: 25136623 PMCID: PMC4129974 DOI: 10.1155/2014/787143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2014] [Revised: 07/08/2014] [Accepted: 07/10/2014] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) mostly arises sporadically, but a fraction of cases are associated with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The presence of a BRCA mutation in OC patients has been suggested as a prognostic and predictive factor. In addition, the identification of asymptomatic carriers of such mutations offers an unprecedented opportunity for OC prevention.
This review is aimed at exploring the current knowledge on epidemiological and molecular aspects of BRCA-associated OC predisposition, on pathology and clinical behavior of OC occurring in BRCA mutation carriers, and on the available options for managing asymptomatic carriers.
Collapse
|
39
|
Schover LR, van der Kaaij M, van Dorst E, Creutzberg C, Huyghe E, Kiserud CE. Sexual dysfunction and infertility as late effects of cancer treatment. EJC Suppl 2014; 12:41-53. [PMID: 26217165 PMCID: PMC4250536 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcsup.2014.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2014] [Accepted: 03/26/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Sexual dysfunction is a common consequence of cancer treatment, affecting at least half of men and women treated for pelvic malignancies and over a quarter of people with other types of cancer. Problems are usually linked to damage to nerves, blood vessels, and hormones that underlie normal sexual function. Sexual dysfunction also may be associated with depression, anxiety, relationship conflict, and loss of self-esteem. Innovations in cancer treatment such as robotic surgery or more targeted radiation therapy have not had the anticipated result of reducing sexual dysfunction. Some new and effective cancer treatments, including aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer or chemoradiation for anal cancer also have very severe sexual morbidity. Cancer-related infertility is an issue for younger patients, who comprise a much smaller percentage of total cancer survivors. However, the long-term emotional impact of being unable to have a child after cancer can be extremely distressing. Advances in knowledge about how cancer treatments may damage fertility, as well as newer techniques to preserve fertility, offer hope to patients who have not completed their childbearing at cancer diagnosis. Unfortunately, surveys in industrialised nations confirm that many cancer patients are still not informed about potential changes to their sexual function or fertility, and all modalities of fertility preservation remain underutilised. After cancer treatment, many patients continue to have unmet needs for information about restoring sexual function or becoming a parent. Although more research is needed on optimal clinical practice, current studies suggest a multidisciplinary approach, including both medical and psychosocial treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie R. Schover
- Department of Behavioral Science, Unit 1330, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301439, Houston, TX 77230-1439, USA
| | - Marleen van der Kaaij
- Department of Internal Medicine, ZH 4A 35, VU University Medical Centre, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eleonora van Dorst
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecological Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carien Creutzberg
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, K1-P, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Huyghe
- Service d’Urologie et d’Andrologie, Hopital Rangueil, 1, avenue Jean Poulhes, TSA 50032, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | - Cecilie E. Kiserud
- National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Finch APM, Lubinski J, Møller P, Singer CF, Karlan B, Senter L, Rosen B, Maehle L, Ghadirian P, Cybulski C, Huzarski T, Eisen A, Foulkes WD, Kim-Sing C, Ainsworth P, Tung N, Lynch HT, Neuhausen S, Metcalfe KA, Thompson I, Murphy J, Sun P, Narod SA. Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:1547-53. [PMID: 24567435 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.53.2820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 491] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purposes of this study were to estimate the reduction in risk of ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation after oophorectomy, by age of oophorectomy; to estimate the impact of prophylactic oophorectomy on all-cause mortality; and to estimate 5-year survival associated with clinically detected ovarian, occult, and peritoneal cancers diagnosed in the cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were identified from an international registry; 5,783 women completed a baseline questionnaire and ≥ one follow-up questionnaires. Women were observed until either diagnosis of ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer, death, or date of most recent follow-up. Hazard ratios (HRs) for cancer incidence and all-cause mortality associated with oophorectomy were evaluated using time-dependent survival analyses. RESULTS After an average follow-up period of 5.6 years, 186 women developed either ovarian (n = 132), fallopian (n = 22), or peritoneal (n = 32) cancer, of whom 68 have died. HR for ovarian, fallopian, or peritoneal cancer associated with bilateral oophorectomy was 0.20 (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.30; P < .001). Among women who had no history of cancer at baseline, HR for all-cause mortality to age 70 years associated with an oophorectomy was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.39; P < .001). CONCLUSION Preventive oophorectomy was associated with an 80% reduction in the risk of ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer in BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers and a 77% reduction in all-cause mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy P M Finch
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Pål Møller
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Christian F Singer
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Beth Karlan
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Leigha Senter
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Barry Rosen
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Lovise Maehle
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Parviz Ghadirian
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - William D Foulkes
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Charmaine Kim-Sing
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Peter Ainsworth
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Nadine Tung
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Henry T Lynch
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Susan Neuhausen
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Kelly A Metcalfe
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Islay Thompson
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Joan Murphy
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Ping Sun
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Steven A Narod
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Long-term prognosis of early-onset breast cancer in a population-based cohort with a known BRCA1/2 mutation status. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 144:133-42. [PMID: 24477976 PMCID: PMC3924030 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2842-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2014] [Accepted: 01/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
All women in the South Sweden Health Care Region with breast cancer diagnosed aged less than 41 during the period between 1990 and 1995 were contacted in 1996 and offered germline mutation analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Mutation carriers (n = 20) were compared with noncarriers (n = 201) for overall survival (OS) and risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Mutation carriers were younger at diagnosis and more likely to have ER-negative, PgR-negative and grade III tumors. Median follow-up was 19 years. The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year OS were 60, 45, 39, and 39 % for mutation carriers and 82, 70, 59, and 53 % for noncarriers, respectively (5-year log-rank P = 0.013; 10-year P = 0.008; 15-year P = 0.020; and 20-year P = 0.046). In univariable analysis, there was a trend for an inferior OS for mutation carriers (HR 1.8; 95 % CI 1.0–3.3). When stratified for use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, an inferior OS was significant only for the subgroup of patients who did not receive chemotherapy (HR 3.0; 95 % CI 1.2–7.7). In multivarible analysis, BRCA1/2 mutation status was a significant predictor of OS when adjusting for tumor stage, age, and use of chemotherapy, but not when ER status was also included in the model. The 15-year cumulative risk of CBC was 53 % for mutation carriers and 10 % for noncarriers (HR 5.9; 95 % CI 1.9–18.6); among the noncarriers the risks were 5, 22, and 30 % for patients without close relatives having breast cancer, with second-degree relatives having breast cancer, and with firstdegree relatives with breast cancer, respectively. In conclusion, the poor prognosis of young BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast cancer is mainly explained by the prevalent occurrence of negative prognostic factors rather than mutation status per se, and can to at least some extent be abrogated by the use of chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
42
|
|
43
|
BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are potentially at higher cardiovascular risk. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2014; 91:159-71. [PMID: 24529552 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2013] [Revised: 12/24/2013] [Accepted: 01/14/2014] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have an elevated risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer at a relatively young age. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is an established strategy to tremendously reduce the risk of ovarian cancer. It is recommended to perform this surgery at age 35-40 years (BRCA1) and at age 40-45 years (BRCA2) resulting in an early and abrupt menopause. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are potentially at higher risk of cardiovascular diseases due to early surgical menopause, and cardiotoxic effects of adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Furthermore, preliminary results of experimental studies suggest a possible causative function of the BRCA genes in cardiovascular risk. More research on cardiovascular health risks in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is needed, especially in the field of cardio-oncology, requiring additional attention to potentially cumulative effects on cardiovascular risks in this specific group of women.
Collapse
|
44
|
Bordeira-Carriço R, Ferreira D, Mateus DD, Pinheiro H, Pêgo AP, Santos MAS, Oliveira C. Rescue of wild-type E-cadherin expression from nonsense-mutated cancer cells by a suppressor-tRNA. Eur J Hum Genet 2014; 22:1085-92. [PMID: 24424122 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2013] [Revised: 11/12/2013] [Accepted: 11/20/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) syndrome, although rare, is highly penetrant at an early age, and is severe and incurable because of ineffective screening tools and therapy. Approximately 45% of HDGC families carry germline CDH1/E-cadherin alterations, 20% of which are nonsense leading to premature protein truncation. Prophylactic gastrectomy is the only recommended approach for all asymptomatic CDH1 mutation carriers. Suppressor-tRNAs can replace premature stop codons (PTCs) with a cognate amino acid, inducing readthrough and generating full-length proteins. The use of suppressor-tRNAs in HDGC patients could therefore constitute a less invasive therapeutic option for nonsense mutation carriers, delaying the development of gastric cancer. Our analysis revealed that 23/108 (21.3%) of E-cadherin-mutant families carried nonsense mutations that could be potentially corrected by eight suppressor-tRNAs, and arginine was the most frequently affected amino acid. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we developed an arginine suppressor-tRNA vector to correct one HDGC nonsense mutation. E-cadherin- deficient cell lines were transfected with plasmids carrying simultaneously the suppressor-tRNA and wild-type or mutant CDH1 mini-genes. RT-PCR, western blot, immunofluorescence, flow cytometry and proximity ligation assay (PLA) were used to establish the model, and monitor mRNA and protein expression and function recovery from CDH1 vectors. Cells expressing a CDH1 mini-gene, carrying a nonsense mutation and the suppressor-tRNA, recovered full-length E-cadherin expression and its correct localization and incorporation into the adhesion complex. This is the first demonstration of functional recovery of a mutated causative gene in hereditary cancer by cognate amino acid replacement with suppressor-tRNAs. Of the HDGC families, 21.3% are candidates for correction with suppressor-tRNAs to potentially delay cancer onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renata Bordeira-Carriço
- Expression Regulation in Cancer Group, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
| | - Daniel Ferreira
- Expression Regulation in Cancer Group, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
| | - Denisa D Mateus
- Expression Regulation in Cancer Group, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
| | - Hugo Pinheiro
- Expression Regulation in Cancer Group, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Paula Pêgo
- 1] INEB, Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal [2] Universidade do Porto-Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Porto, Portugal [3] Universidade do Porto-Faculdade de Engenharia, Porto, Portugal
| | - Manuel A S Santos
- RNA Biology Laboratory, Department of Biology and CESAM, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Carla Oliveira
- 1] Expression Regulation in Cancer Group, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal [2] Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Maksimenko J, Irmejs A, Nakazawa-Miklasevica M, Melbarde-Gorkusa I, Trofimovics G, Gardovskis J, Miklasevics E. Prognostic role of BRCA1 mutation in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Oncol Lett 2013; 7:278-284. [PMID: 24348864 PMCID: PMC3861604 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2013.1684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2013] [Accepted: 11/01/2013] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is proposed to be an immunohistochemical surrogate of the basal-like breast cancer subtype. In spite of the relative chemosensitivity of this cancer subtype, it is characterized by aggressive clinical behavior; therefore, a further subclassification of TNBC is required to develop new targeted treatment. In previous studies, a strong correlation between BRCA1 mutation-associated tumors and TNBC has been identified. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic significance of carrying two germline BRCA1 founder mutations (4153delA and 5382insC) in patients with TNBC in the Latvian population. A total of 78 consecutive BRCA1 mutation-negative and 38 BRCA1 mutation-positive invasive TNBC patients in stage I-IV with no history of ovarian or other primary advanced cancers, who had undergone definitive surgery and genetic testing between 2005 and 2011, were deemed eligible for study. Relapse rates and breast cancer-specific survival (BCS) outcomes were compared between mutation carriers and non-carriers. Univariate and multivariate analyses Cox proportional-hazards models were used to compute independent predictors of survival outcomes. No statistically significant differences were identified in relation to tumor size, T stage, stage, Ki-67 status and tumor differentiation grade between the two groups. The median follow-up period was 36 months for mutation carriers and 41 months for non-carriers. A higher proportion of BRCA1 mutation non-carriers experienced distant recurrence compared with that of mutation carriers (P<0.03). BRCA1 mutation carriers had a significantly higher BCS than non-carriers (94.9 vs. 76.9%; P<0.02). In the univariate analyses, BRCA1-positive status was associated with decreased risk of distant recurrence (HR, 0.228; 95% Cl, 0.052-0.997; P<0.049) and breast cancer-specific mortality (HR, 0.209; 95% Cl, 0.048-0.902; P<0.036). In the multivariate analysis Cox proportional-hazards model, BRCA1-positive status was an independent favorable prognostic factor for distant recurrence-free survival (HR, 3.301; 95% Cl, 1.102-9.893; P<0.033). In conclusion, results of the present study demonstrate that positive BRCA1 founder mutation status in TNBC, with no evidence of ovarian or other cancer type in advanced stage, significantly improves prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arvids Irmejs
- Oncology Institute, Riga Stradins University, Riga, LV-1012, Latvia
| | | | | | | | - Janis Gardovskis
- Oncology Institute, Riga Stradins University, Riga, LV-1012, Latvia
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kloor M, Staffa L, Ahadova A, von Knebel Doeberitz M. Clinical significance of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013; 399:23-31. [PMID: 24048684 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-013-1112-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2013] [Accepted: 09/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous tumor type with regard to molecular pathogenesis and genetic instability. The majority of colorectal cancers display chromosomal instability and follow the classical adenoma-carcinoma sequence of tumor progression. A subset of about 15 % of colorectal cancers, however, displays DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and the high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) phenotype. MSI-H colorectal cancers can occur as sporadic tumors or in the context of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) or Lynch syndrome. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The MSI-H phenotype is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome-associated cancers, which is of diagnostic relevance for the identification of Lynch syndrome mutation carriers. MSI-H colorectal cancers are characterized by a distinct clinical behavior, which results from their particular molecular pathogenesis and gives microsatellite instability testing its clinical significance. The MSI-H phenotype shows association with proximal tumor localization, a dense local lymphocyte infiltration, and a low frequency of distant organ metastasis. Moreover, MSI-H colorectal cancers have a better prognosis than their microsatellite-stable counterparts. A distinct responsiveness of MSI-H colorectal cancer patients towards chemotherapy has been shown in several studies. CONCLUSIONS The clinical characteristics of MSI-H cancers are closely linked to their molecular pathogenesis, and research on the molecular alteration characteristic of MSI-H cancers may provide the basis for novel diagnostic or therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Kloor
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Meaney-Delman D, Bellcross CA. Hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome: a primer for obstetricians/gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2013; 40:475-512. [PMID: 24021253 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2013.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
An understanding of the diagnosis and clinical management of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) is essential for obstetricians/gynecologists. This article provides practical information regarding collecting a family history, cancer risk assessment and genetic testing, BRCA-associated cancer prognosis and treatment, screening recommendations, and prevention strategies. Through appropriate cancer risk assessment, women with BRCA1/2 mutations can be identified, and screening and prevention strategies can be used before a diagnosis of cancer occurs. Women's health providers with a strong working knowledge of HBOC are able to improve the quality of care for women and families impacted by BRCA1/2 mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Meaney-Delman
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, 49 Jesse Hill Jr Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Stavropoulou AV, Fostira F, Pertesi M, Tsitlaidou M, Voutsinas GE, Triantafyllidou O, Bamias A, Dimopoulos MA, Timotheadou E, Pectasides D, Christodoulou C, Klouvas G, Papadimitriou C, Makatsoris T, Pentheroudakis G, Aravantinos G, Karydakis V, Yannoukakos D, Fountzilas G, Konstantopoulou I. Prevalence of BRCA1 mutations in familial and sporadic greek ovarian cancer cases. PLoS One 2013; 8:e58182. [PMID: 23536787 PMCID: PMC3594241 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2012] [Accepted: 01/31/2013] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes contribute to approximately 18% of hereditary ovarian cancers conferring an estimated lifetime risk from 15% to 50%. A variable incidence of mutations has been reported for these genes in ovarian cancer cases from different populations. In Greece, six mutations in BRCA1 account for 63% of all mutations detected in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of BRCA1 mutations in a Greek cohort of 106 familial ovarian cancer patients that had strong family history or metachronous breast cancer and 592 sporadic ovarian cancer cases. All 698 patients were screened for the six recurrent Greek mutations (including founder mutations c.5266dupC, p.G1738R and the three large deletions of exon 20, exons 23-24 and exon 24). In familial cases, the BRCA1 gene was consequently screened for exons 5, 11, 12, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24. A deleterious BRCA1 mutation was found in 43/106 (40.6%) of familial cancer cases and in 27/592 (4.6%) of sporadic cases. The variant of unknown clinical significance p.V1833M was identified in 9/698 patients (1.3%). The majority of BRCA1 carriers (71.2%) presented a high-grade serous phenotype. Identifying a mutation in the BRCA1 gene among breast and/or ovarian cancer families is important, as it enables carriers to take preventive measures. All ovarian cancer patients with a serous phenotype should be considered for genetic testing. Further studies are warranted to determine the prevalence of mutations in the rest of the BRCA1 gene, in the BRCA2 gene, and other novel predisposing genes for breast and ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra V. Stavropoulou
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRaSTES, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece
| | - Florentia Fostira
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRaSTES, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece
| | - Maroulio Pertesi
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRaSTES, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece
| | - Marianthi Tsitlaidou
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRaSTES, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece
| | - Gerassimos E. Voutsinas
- Laboratory of Environmental Mutagenesis and Carcinogenesis, Institute of Biosciences and Applications, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece
| | - Olga Triantafyllidou
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRaSTES, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Meletios A. Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni Timotheadou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Pectasides
- Oncology Section, Second Department of Internal Medicine, “Hippokration” Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - George Klouvas
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, “Metropolitan” Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
| | - Christos Papadimitriou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Thomas Makatsoris
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | | | - Gerasimos Aravantinos
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, “Agii Anargiri” Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Drakoulis Yannoukakos
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRaSTES, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece
| | - George Fountzilas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Irene Konstantopoulou
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRaSTES, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|