Improving Diabetes Control Through Remote Glucose Monitoring in a Diabetes Self-Management Program for Employees of a Health System

Structured Outpatient Diabetes Education and Telehealth Follow-up to Improve HbA 1c

BACKGROUND

More than 10% of Americans have diabetes, with higher rates in Hispanics and African Americans. National Healthy People 2030 goals for expected decrease in HbA 1c levels have not been met.

LOCAL PROBLEM

No standardized diabetes education or follow-up existed at a free clinic. Patients exhibited diabetic self-management inadequacies and elevated HbA 1c levels.

METHODS

A pre/postimplementation study design was used to evaluate changes in HbA 1c levels, medication adherence, missed appointments, and emergency department visits.

INTERVENTIONS

Structured diabetes education and follow-up text/phone messages for patients with HbA 1c levels 8% or higher were implemented over 3 months.

RESULTS

Outcome data were available for 27 of the 34 participants. Postimplementation, there was a significant 1.7% decrease in mean HbA 1c levels ( P < .001). No significant differences were found for the other outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Structured diabetes education and follow-up text/phone messages in a free clinic improved patients' HbA 1c levels.

Effect of remote management on comprehensive management of diabetes mellitus during the COVID-19 epidemic

OBJECTIVE

We learned about the health condition of people with diabetes during the COVID-19 epidemic through a questionnaire survey. We conducted a randomized controlled study to confirm the effectiveness of remote management using the mobile phone WeChat app on comprehensive management of diabetes mellitus during the COVID-19 epidemic.

METHODS

We distributed questionnaires that collected information on the health condition of people with diabetes during the COVID-19 epidemic through the WeChat app. We assigned 90 cases to the intervention group and 90 cases to the control group. The intervention group was managed remotely through the WeChat app, and the control group received traditional medical treatment. The blood glucose, blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), time in range (TIR) and incidence of hypoglycemia were compared after three months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The BMI and postprandial blood glucose (PBG) of the control group at 3 months was significantly higher than that at baseline (P < 0.001), and TIR decreased at 3 months (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in blood pressure compared with baseline in the control group, while blood pressure decreased in the intervention group (P < 0.05). In the intervention group, fast blood glucose(FBG) and PBG decreased compared with their baseline values, and the TIR level increased, both of which were statistically significant (P < 0.001). The FBG, PBG, and TIR of the intervention group were better than those in the control group at 3 months (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of hypoglycemia between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

During the COVID-19 epidemic, diabetes treatment has been facing new challenges, and the traditional treatment mode is limited. Remote management can increase TIR without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia. Remote management can prevent weight gain and improve patients' self-management and compliance during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Impact of a diabetes remote monitoring program on medication adherence

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence in diabetes is well documented to be associated with inadequate glycemic control. Through remote blood glucose (BG) monitoring, unlimited test strip and lancet supplies, personal coaching, and online access to clinical information and educational resources, diabetes remote monitoring (DRM) programs may provide a solution. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between patient participation in a DRM solution and adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD). METHODS: A retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted using deidentified administrative claims data from a large pharmacy benefit manager. Commercially insured patients aged 18 years or older and having 2 or more 30-day adjusted OAD claims comprised the target sample. Patients enrolled in insurance plans that implemented DRM, who had at least 1 BG check (ever engaged) between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2018 (exposure) were matched to patients enrolled in insurance plans that did not implement DRM (nonexposure). After a 1:2 matching on baseline demographics, disease burden proxy, total pharmacy out-of-pocket costs, previous adherence and insulin use, nonexposure group participants were assigned the same first BG check date as their matched DRM participants. Medication adherence measured as proportion of days covered (PDC) in the 365 days following first BG check was examined as a continuous and binary outcome measure (PDC > 80% or adherent vs < 80% or nonadherent). Multivariable linear and logistic regression were conducted to examine differential magnitude in adherence and likelihood of being adherent, respectively. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 6,002 exposure and 12,004 nonexposure group patients. DRM participants who were ever engaged had a 4.5% higher adherence rate (P < 0.001) and 42% higher odds of being adherent (P < 0.001) in the period after engagement compared with non-DRM participants. Sensitivity analyses showed that patients engaged continuously (> 1 BG check per week) for 3, 6, and 12 months had 5.1%, 5.2%, and 6.4% higher adherence rates, respectively (P < 0.001), and 52%, 64%, and 98% higher odds of being adherent, respectively (P < 0.001), compared with non-DRM participants. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings offer evidence that DRM engagement is associated with higher odds of medication adherence. DRM solutions that provide access to glucose test results, personalized coaching, educational resources, and lower testing supply cost can also influence adherence. Our findings have important implications for payers and patients related to improved health outcomes due to higher medication adherence. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was provided by Express Scripts. Munshi, Amelung, Carter, and Henderson are employed by Express Scripts. James and Shah are employed by Livongo, which provided the DRM solution.