Racial and ethnic variation in access to health care, provision of health care services, and ratings of health among women with histories of gestational diabetes mellitus

Impact of the diagnosis of gestational diabetes on maternal physical activity after pregnancy

AIM

The diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM) identifies women who are at future risk of developing type 2 diabetes. However, it is unclear if diagnosing GDM thus motivates women to increase physical activity after pregnancy or if this medicalization has the opposite effect of decreasing activity, possibly reflecting assumption of a sick role. We thus sought to evaluate the impact of diagnosing GDM on changes in maternal physical activity after pregnancy.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, physical activity patterns were assessed by the Baecke questionnaire for the year before pregnancy and the first year postpartum in 405 white women comprising the following three gestational glucose tolerance groups: (a) those who did not have GDM (non-GDM; n = 247), (b) women with undiagnosed GDM (n = 46) and (c) those diagnosed with GDM (n = 112).

RESULTS

In the year before pregnancy, mean adjusted total physical activity progressively decreased from non-GDM to undiagnosed GDM to diagnosed GDM (p = .067). Conversely, at 1 year postpartum, total physical activity was highest in those who had been diagnosed with GDM (p = .02). Compared with non-GDM, diagnosed GDM predicted an increase in total physical activity from pre-pregnancy to 1 year postpartum (t = 2.3, p = .02) whereas undiagnosed GDM predicted a concurrent decrease in leisure-time activity (t = -2.74, p = .006). Accordingly, the mean adjusted increase in body mass index from pre-pregnancy to 1 year postpartum was lowest in those with diagnosed GDM (0.26 ± 0.25 kg/m2 ), highest in undiagnosed GDM (1.23 ± 0.38 kg/m2 ) and intermediate in non-GDM (0.89 ± 0.22 kg/m2 ) (overall p = .04).

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis of GDM leads to increased physical activity after pregnancy that may partially attenuate postpartum weight retention.

Predictors of Health-Protective Behavior and Glycemia After Gestational Diabetes, NHANES 2007-2014

Purpose

This study examined weight loss behavior and the prevalence of hyperglycemia unawareness (unknown high blood glucose) after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), within a nationally, representative sample. This study also examined social-demographic, psychosocial, provider communication, and health care access/utilization factors as predictors of A1C and health-protective behavior after GDM.

Methods

A secondary analysis of 2007-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) data was conducted, including 205 women, aged 20 to 44 years, with a history of GDM, whose last live birth was in the past 10 years, excluding pregnant women and those with diabetes. Weighted bivariate, stepwise linear, and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine correlates of A1C, weight change, weight loss attempt and behavior, diabetes screening, and physical activity.

Results

Hyperglycemia unawareness was associated with increased A1C and weight gain in the past year. Personal weight loss goal and perception of overweight increased the odds of weight loss attempt. Depressive symptoms were associated with weight gain over the past year. A third of the sample failed to have their glucose tested in the past 3 years. Two-thirds were never told about their personal risk for diabetes, but provider communication increased the odds of meeting weekly activity recommendations and glucose screening. Hispanic women and non-Hispanic black women were less likely to have had glucose screening than non-Hispanic white women.

Conclusion

Diabetes educators should address gaps in provider communication, while supporting psychosocial needs and reducing disparities to encourage health-protective behavior after GDM. The American Association of Diabetes Educators, 7 Self-Care Behaviors (AADE-7TM) provides an excellent framework for interventions to support health-protective behavior after GDM.

Experiences of diabetes self-management: a focus group study among Australians with type 2 diabetes

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore the experiences and concerns of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, in a predominantly low socio-economic setting.

BACKGROUND

Currently, approximately 1 million Australians have diabetes and rates have more than doubled since 1989. Type 2 diabetes mellitus accounts for approximately 85% of diabetes cases. Risk factors include obesity, older age, low socio-economic status, sedentary lifestyle and ethnicity. Older individuals from low socio-economic backgrounds are particularly at risk of both developing and of mismanaging their condition.

DESIGN

Exploratory qualitative design.

METHODS

Focus groups were used to collect data from 22 individuals, aged 40 to more than 70 years, with type 2 diabetes mellitus, who were attending local health services for their diabetes care. Focus groups ranged in size from four to eight individuals and all were recorded, transcribed and analysed. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

Participants described their experiences of managing their diabetes as emotionally, physically and socially challenging. Data analysis revealed four main themes including: (1) diabetes the silent disease; (2) a personal journey (3) the work of managing diabetes; and (4) access to resources and services. Throughout, participants highlighted the impact of diabetes on the family, and the importance of family members in providing support and encouragement to assist their self-management efforts.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants in this study were generally satisfied with their diabetes care but identified a need for clear simple instruction immediately post-diagnosis, followed by a need for additional informal information when they had gained some understanding of their condition.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Findings reveal a number of unmet information and support needs for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In particular, it is important for healthcare professionals and family members to recognise the significant emotional burden that diabetes imposes, and the type and quantity of information individuals with diabetes prefer. It is also important to consider levels of health literacy in the community when developing diabetes-related information or programmes.

Lifestyle interventions to reduce risk of diabetes among women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus

While lifestyle interventions involving exercise and a healthy diet in high-risk adults have been found to reduce progression to type 2 diabetes by >50%, little attention has been given to the potential benefits of such strategies in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We conducted a literature search of PubMed for English language studies of randomized controlled trials of lifestyle interventions among women with a history of GDM. In total, nine studies were identified which fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The majority of randomized trials of lifestyle interventions in women with GDM have been limited to pilot or feasibility studies. However, preliminary findings suggest that such interventions can improve diabetes risk factors in women with a history of GDM. Larger, well-designed controlled randomized trials are needed to assess the effects of lifestyle interventions on preventing subsequent progression to type 2 diabetes among women with GDM.

The diagnostic and prognostic performance of a selective screening strategy for gestational diabetes mellitus according to ethnicity in Europe

CONTEXT

The performance of standard selective screening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) may vary according to ethnicity.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of a selective screening tool to determine whether it accurately predicts GDM and events in women of different ethnicities. The tool selectively screens based on patients having one or more of the following risk factors (RFs): body mass index ≥25 kg/m(2), age ≥35 years, family history of diabetes, and personal history of GDM or macrosomia.

DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted an observational prospective study at a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

We included 17 344 women of European (30.9%), North African (29.6%), Sub-Saharan African (22.2%), Caribbean (8.7%), Indian-Pakistani-Sri Lankan (5.5%), and Asian (3.3%) ethnicities who were without pregravid diabetes and had singleton deliveries (2002-2010).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We universally screened GDM and GDM-related events (pre-eclampsia, birth weight ≥4000 g, or dystocia).

RESULTS

Independent of confounding factors, North African (odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.52; P < .001) and Indian-Pakistani-Sri Lankan (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 2.13-3.00; P < .001) women had more GDM than Europeans, whereas Sub-Saharan African women had less (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.94; P < .01). Having one or more RFs was associated with GDM among Europeans (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.22-1.76), North African (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.55), Sub-Saharan African (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.20-1.83), and Caribbean (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.12-2.14) women. Having one or more RFs was also associated with GDM-related events only in European (P < .01) and North African (P < .05) women, with the following incidences in Europeans: no GDM/no RF, 6.9%; no GDM/RF, 9.0%; GDM/no RF, 14.7%; and GDM/RF, 12.6%.

CONCLUSION

Standard selective screening criteria were not predictive of GDM in women from India-Pakistan-Sri Lanka and Asia and were associated with GDM-related events only in European and North African women. However, the women with GDM, who were routinely treated, had a poor prognosis, even for those free of RFs. These results support universal screening, irrespective of ethnicity.

Establishing consensus in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes following HAPO: where do we stand?

New proposals for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM), promulgated by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG), will substantially increase the number of women diagnosed with GDM. This will have an enormous impact on healthcare resources, diverting attention away from genuinely high risk diabetic pregnancies. Randomized trials in 'mild' GDM indicate that the main effects of treatment are a 2 %-3 % reduction in birth weight, fewer 'big babies', and less shoulder dystocia. However, these studies used different diagnostic criteria, and women diagnosed by the broader IADPSG criteria may not derive the same modest benefit. Modeling indicates a very high cost per QALY, unless later development of type 2 diabetes can be prevented. Far from producing consensus, the IADPSG suggestion has thrown sharply into focus the need to assess critically the risks, costs and benefits of adopting criteria that may pathologize a large number of otherwise normal pregnancies.

Health disparities in endocrine disorders: biological, clinical, and nonclinical factors--an Endocrine Society scientific statement

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to provide a scholarly review of the published literature on biological, clinical, and nonclinical contributors to race/ethnic and sex disparities in endocrine disorders and to identify current gaps in knowledge as a focus for future research needs. PARTICIPANTS IN DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENTIFIC STATEMENT: The Endocrine Society's Scientific Statement Task Force (SSTF) selected the leader of the statement development group (S.H.G.). She selected an eight-member writing group with expertise in endocrinology and health disparities, which was approved by the Society. All discussions regarding the scientific statement content occurred via teleconference or written correspondence. No funding was provided to any expert or peer reviewer, and all participants volunteered their time to prepare this Scientific Statement.

EVIDENCE

The primary sources of data on global disease prevalence are from the World Health Organization. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed identified U.S. population-based studies. Search strategies combining Medical Subject Headings terms and keyword terms and phrases defined two concepts: 1) racial, ethnic, and sex differences including specific populations; and 2) the specific endocrine disorder or condition. The search identified systematic reviews, meta-analyses, large cohort and population-based studies, and original studies focusing on the prevalence and determinants of disparities in endocrine disorders. consensus process: The writing group focused on population differences in the highly prevalent endocrine diseases of type 2 diabetes mellitus and related conditions (prediabetes and diabetic complications), gestational diabetes, metabolic syndrome with a focus on obesity and dyslipidemia, thyroid disorders, osteoporosis, and vitamin D deficiency. Authors reviewed and synthesized evidence in their areas of expertise. The final statement incorporated responses to several levels of review: 1) comments of the SSTF and the Advocacy and Public Outreach Core Committee; and 2) suggestions offered by the Council and members of The Endocrine Society.

CONCLUSIONS

Several themes emerged in the statement, including a need for basic science, population-based, translational and health services studies to explore underlying mechanisms contributing to endocrine health disparities. Compared to non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks have worse outcomes and higher mortality from certain disorders despite having a lower (e.g. macrovascular complications of diabetes mellitus and osteoporotic fractures) or similar (e.g. thyroid cancer) incidence of these disorders. Obesity is an important contributor to diabetes risk in minority populations and to sex disparities in thyroid cancer, suggesting that population interventions targeting weight loss may favorably impact a number of endocrine disorders. There are important implications regarding the definition of obesity in different race/ethnic groups, including potential underestimation of disease risk in Asian-Americans and overestimation in non-Hispanic black women. Ethnic-specific cut-points for central obesity should be determined so that clinicians can adequately assess metabolic risk. There is little evidence that genetic differences contribute significantly to race/ethnic disparities in the endocrine disorders examined. Multilevel interventions have reduced disparities in diabetes care, and these successes can be modeled to design similar interventions for other endocrine diseases.

Lifestyle behaviors, chronic diseases, and ratings of health between black and white adults with pre-diabetes

PURPOSES

The purposes of this study were to assess differences in lifestyle behaviors and other health-related factors between black and white adults with pre-diabetes and to identify predictors for lifestyle behaviors.

METHODS

Using the 2007 and 2009 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), an annual cross-sectional survey of randomly selected samples from each state, black (n = 1156) and white (n = 9539) adults with pre-diabetes were compared on lifestyle behaviors, general health practices, perceptions of health, chronic diseases, and access to care. Predictors for participating in regular physical activity and adequate intake of fruits and vegetables were identified for each racial and gender group using multiple regression procedures.

RESULTS

Less than 40% of the adults with pre-diabetes participated in regular physical activity, and less than a quarter had adequate intake of fruits and vegetables; only 20% met the body weight recommendations. Compared to whites, blacks were more likely to be overweight/obese (86% vs 79%) and less likely to engage in regular physical activity (29% vs 40%). Except for adequate intake of fruits and vegetables, each racial and gender group had different predictors for regular physical activity. For black males, the predictors included impaired physical health and coronary heart disease/stroke. For black females, the predictors were younger age and routine checkup.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant disparities exist between blacks and whites in lifestyle behaviors and other health-related factors. Targeted intervention strategies are needed to motivate blacks to modify behaviors to prevent or delay the development of diabetes.

Comparison of lifestyle behaviors and related factors between Asian American and white adults with prediabetes

This study compares lifestyle behaviors and related factors between Asian American and white adults with self-reported prediabetes and identifies covariates/predictors for regular physical activity and adequate intake of fruits/vegetables. Using data from the United States of America Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 302 Asian Americans and 9558 white adults were analyzed. There were no significant differences for participating in regular physical activity or consumption of adequate fruits/vegetables between the two groups. Overall, 40% of the respondents engaged in regular physical activity, whereas less than 25% reported an adequate intake of fruits/vegetables. In the adjusted models, compared to white, Asian Americans were less likely to have impaired physical (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36 0.80) or mental health (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.61), or cardiovascular diseases (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.87). The covariates/predictors that relate to the behaviors differed between the groups. We conclude that interventions to increase physical activity and healthy eating for Asian American and white adults with prediabetes should address the different covariates/predictors for each group.

A web-based pedometer programme in women with a recent history of gestational diabetes

AIMS

Women with remote histories of gestational diabetes mellitus can reduce their diabetes risk through lifestyle changes, but the effectiveness of interventions in women with more recent histories of gestational diabetes has not been reported. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study of a low-intensity web-based pedometer programme targeting glucose intolerance among women with recent gestational diabetes.

METHODS

Women with a gestational diabetes delivery within the past 3 years were randomized to a 13-week intervention consisting of a structured web-based pedometer programme which gave personalized steps-per-week goals, pedometers and education regarding lifestyle modification, or to a letter about diabetes risk reduction and screening after delivery for gestational diabetes (control condition). The main outcome measures were change in fasting plasma glucose and 2-h glucose levels on a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test between baseline and 13-week follow-up. Weight was a secondary outcome and behavioural constructs (self-efficacy, social support, risk perception) were also assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-nine women were enrolled. At 13-week follow-up, women randomized to the intervention did not have significant changes in behavioural constructs, physical activity or anthropometrics compared with women in the control group. Changes in fasting plasma glucose (-0.046 mmol/l vs. 0.038 mmol/l, P = 0.65), 2-h glucose values (-0.48 mmol/l vs. -0.42 mmol/l, P = 0.91) and weight (-0.14 kg vs. -1.5 kg, P = 0.13) were similar between the control and intervention groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Structured web-based education utilizing pedometers is feasible although uptake may be low. Such programmes may need to be supplemented with additional measures in order to be effective for reduction of diabetes risk.

A qualitative study of perceived barriers to management of diabetes among women with a history of diabetes during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled diabetes during pregnancy can cause adverse maternal and infant outcomes. This study explored barriers to glycemic control before, during, and after pregnancy and describes knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors among pregnant women with pregestational diabetes (PGDM) or gestational diabetes (GDM).

METHODS

Focus groups were conducted in the Atlanta area among white, black, and Hispanic women who had diabetes during a recent pregnancy. Participants were a convenience sample drawn from a variety of sources. Nine focus groups were held with women who had GDM, and seven focus groups were held with women who had PGDM.

RESULTS

Participants identified five main areas of barriers to management of diabetes during pregnancy: financial barriers and difficulties accessing care, barriers to maintaining a healthy diet and exercising, communication difficulties, lack of social support, and barriers related to diabetes care. Participants with GDM had general awareness of possible diabetes complications but frequently could not name specific effects of diabetes on the woman or child during and after pregnancy. Most were unaware of their risk for developing type 2 diabetes later. Participants with PGDM expressed concern about the increased risk of adverse outcomes for the baby; most knew the importance of maintaining glycemic control during pregnancy. Low rates of pregnancy planning were reported in both groups. Pregnancy planning was not identified as a strategy to ensure a healthy baby.

CONCLUSIONS

The barriers to achieving glycemic control during pregnancy identified in this study could help inform future efforts to assist women in achieving optimal prepregnancy and intrapregnancy glycemic control.

Evaluating the extent of pregravid risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus in women in tehran

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with maternal and fetal complications. Specific outcomes in previous pregnancies are considered as risk factors for GDM in the consecutive pregnancies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pregravid risk factors of GDM in multigravid women.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross sectional study on 114 multigravid women with GDM without previous history of diabetes and compared them with non-diabetic controls. We used modified criteria of Carpenter and Coustan for screening. Risk factors were obtained from medical records of individuals.

RESULTS

We found that women of 26 years and older who had previous neonates with birth weight more than 3800 gram and those affected with hypothyroidism or chronic hypertension were at risk for GDM. The difference of the number of preterm birth in GDM women and healthy controls was statistically significant (p=0.05). There was no significant difference between the numbers of pregnancies, parity, previous fetal and neonatal death and abortion number between patients and the control group.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that maternal age over 26 years, birth weight of previous neonate more than 3800 g, hypothyroidism, chronic hypertension and probably history of preterm birth are significant risk factors for GDM.

Racial/ethnic disparities in gestational diabetes mellitus: findings from a population-based survey

PURPOSE

We sought to explore racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in a population-based sample.

METHODS

Data from the Oregon Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), a stratified, random sample of postpartum women who delivered in Oregon in 2004 and 2005 (n = 3,883; weighted response rate, 75.2%) and linked birth certificates were analyzed. Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic American Indian, and non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander (API) women were oversampled. We categorized women as having had GDM if they gave an affirmative answer on the birth certificate or the PRAMS survey.

RESULTS

Non-Hispanic API women had the highest prevalence of GDM (14.8%); this was true for women with both a normal and a high body mass index (BMI). Asian women were more likely to have had GDM than Pacific Islander women. On multivariate analysis, non-Hispanic APIs were significantly more likely to have a pregnancy complicated by GDM (adjusted odds ratio, 2.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-4.13) than non-Hispanic White women.

CONCLUSION

Non-Hispanic API women, especially Asian women with both normal and high BMI, have increased risk of GDM. Future research should examine the unique risk factors experienced by Asians and health practitioners should be vigilant in screening for GDM regardless of BMI.

Women with diabetes in pregnancy: different perceptions and expectations

Given the increasing incidence of type 1 diabetes, the recent emergence of type 2 diabetes as a condition that can begin during childhood, and the increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus, the number of women who have some form of diabetes during their pregnancies is increasing. The perceptions and expectations of women with diabetes during pregnancy may affect their psychological response to pregnancy as well as their behaviour during and after pregnancy. This article provides an overview of the epidemiology of diabetes in pregnancy, including diabetes diagnosed before pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus. Then, the limited number of studies about women's perceptions of diabetes and pregnancy, based on interviews conducted during or shortly after pregnancy, are reviewed. We present information about how health professionals may manage these perceptions and expectations, based on the findings of these studies, as well as areas for future research.

Gestational diabetes and postpartum physical activity: evidence of lifestyle change 1 year after delivery

Although women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are advised to incorporate physical activity into their lifestyle in order to reduce their risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2DM), it is recognized that new mothers face barriers to postpartum exercise. Thus, we sought to determine whether, following the diagnosis of GDM, women indeed alter their postpartum physical activity patterns, as compared to their peers without GDM. In this prospective observational cohort study, we assessed the physical activity patterns of 238 white women (58 with GDM, 180 without GDM) in the year before pregnancy and in the year following delivery, using the Baecke questionnaire, which evaluates the following three domains of physical activity: work, sport activity, and nonsport leisure-time activity. Before diagnosis with GDM, women reported lower pregravid sport (P = 0.010) and leisure-time activity (P = 0.013), compared to their peers without GDM. By 1 year postpartum, however, there were no longer significant differences between the GDM and non-GDM groups in either sport or leisure-time activity (P = 0.078 and P = 0.957, respectively). In particular, women with GDM significantly increased their leisure-time activity over the first year postpartum (F = 10.1, P = 0.002), whereas the non-GDM group did not (F = 0.00, P = 0.984). Indeed, on multiple linear regression analysis, GDM independently predicted an increase in leisure-time activity between 1 year pregravid and 1 year postpartum (t = 2.55, P = 0.012). Furthermore, this significant relationship persisted even after adjustment for the finding of prediabetes/diabetes at 3 months postpartum (t = 2.83, P = 0.005). In conclusion, women with GDM successfully increased their leisure-time activity in the first year postpartum, reflecting an element of lifestyle change following this diagnosis.

Health disparities: a primer for public health social workers

In 2001, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services published Healthy People 2010, which identified objectives to guide health promotion and to eliminate health disparities. Since 2001, much research has been published documenting racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare. Although progress has been made in eliminating the disparities, ongoing work by public health social workers, researchers, and policy analysts is needed. This paper focuses on racial and ethnic health disparities, why they exist, where they can be found, and some of the key health/medical conditions identified by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to receive attention. Finally, there is a discussion of what policy, professional and community education, and research can to do to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare.

Ethnic disparities in diabetes management: a 10-year population-based repeated cross-sectional study in UK primary care

BACKGROUND

There has been little research on the impact of quality improvement initiatives on ethnic disparities in diabetes management in the UK.

METHODS

Population-based, repeated cross-sectional survey of recorded measurements, prescribing and achievement of treatment targets among 4309 patients with diabetes mellitus using electronic medical records from 26 general practices in North-West London from 1997 to 2006.

RESULTS

Proportions of patients having their blood pressure (BP), cholesterol and HbA1c measured and recorded increased over the study period [from 50.6% to 87.0% (P < 0.0001), 17.0% to 76.7% (P < 0.0001) and 32.9% to 74.1% (P < 0.0001), respectively]. However, some ethnic differences remained. Black patients with diabetes were less likely to achieve target BP (<140/80 mmHg) than the white group [2006 age-sex adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51-0.83]. South Asians were found to have better lipid target control (2006 AOR, 1.57; CI, 1.23-2.00), were more likely to receive oral hypoglycaemic agents (2006 AOR, 2.27; CI, 1.79-2.86) but less likely to receive insulin (2006 AOR, 0.54; CI, 0.42-0.69) than the white group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ethnic disparities persist in diabetes management in this study population, these are starting to be addressed, particularly in the South Asian group. All ethnic groups have benefited from recent quality initiatives in the UK.

Managing women with gestational diabetes mellitus in the postnatal period

Guidelines for management of women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in the postpregnancy period have lagged behind the recognition that this is an important time for medical intervention. However, in the past decade, the evidence-base for screening algorithms, contraceptive management, diabetes prevention strategies and implications for offspring has expanded. In this review, we discuss current recommendations for managing women with GDM in the postnatal period, with particular attention to postpartum diabetes screening, prevention of future glucose intolerance and family planning.

Trends in postpartum diabetes screening and subsequent diabetes and impaired fasting glucose among women with histories of gestational diabetes mellitus: A report from the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) Study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine trends in postpartum glucose screening for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), predictors of screening, trends in postpartum impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and diabetes, and diabetes and pre-diabetes detected by postpartum fasting plasma glucose (FPG) versus a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a cohort study of 14,448 GDM pregnancies delivered between 1995 and 2006. Postpartum screening was defined as performance of either an FPG or OGTT at least 6 weeks after delivery and within 1 year of delivery.

RESULTS

Between 1995 and 2006, the age- and race/ethnicity-adjusted proportion of women who were screened postpartum rose from 20.7% (95% CI 17.8-23.5) to 53.8% (51.3-56.3). Older age, Asian or Hispanic race/ethnicity, higher education, earlier GDM diagnosis, use of diabetes medications during pregnancy, and more provider contacts after delivery were independent predictors of postpartum screening. Obesity and higher parity were independently associated with lower screening performance. Among women who had postpartum screening, the age- and race/ethnicity-adjusted proportion of IFG did not change over time (24.2 [95% CI 20.0-27.8] in 1995-1997 to 24.3 [22.6-26.0] in 2004-2006), but the proportion of women with diabetes decreased from 6.1 (95% CI 4.2-8.1) in 1995-1997 to 3.3 (2.6-4.0) in 2004-2006. Among women who received an OGTT in 2006, 38% of the 204 women with either diabetes or pre-diabetes were identified only by the 2-h glucose measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Postpartum screening has increased over the last decade, but it is still suboptimal. Compared with FPGs alone, the 2-h values identify a higher proportion of women with diabetes or pre-diabetes amenable to intervention.

Ethnic disparities in diabetes care: myth or reality?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ethnic disparities in disease management have been clearly documented across the medical field, but appear to be an even greater issue with regards to chronic disease. While various gaps in the provision of quality care persist, there have been some improvements in addressing some of those challenges. The purpose of this review is to highlight some of the persistent gaps in the provision of healthcare, with a focus on disparities seen in vulnerable populations, as well as opportunities to address those disparities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Disparities in the provision of health persist, especially in vulnerable populations. There is a growing awareness to actively address these issues. A number of projects have been undertaken to assess their impact on the provision of quality healthcare and consequent outcomes, with mixed results. For vulnerable populations, it appears that individualized, repeated, culturally sensitive interventions that involve the community from their inception have had the greatest positive impact.

SUMMARY

A growing body of data is emerging to not only highlight the disparities in healthcare we still confront in the USA, but to also implement strategies to successfully address and resolve those challenges.