Treating diabetic foot osteomyelitis primarily with surgery or antibiotics: have we answered the question?

Causes, prevention, and management of diabetes-related foot ulcers

In this Review, we aim to complement the 2023 update of the guidelines of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. We highlight the complexity of the pathological processes that underlie diabetes-related foot ulceration (DFU) and draw attention to the potential implications for clinical management and outcome. Variation observed in the incidence and outcome of DFUs in different communities might result from differences in study populations and the accessibility of care. Comparing differences in incidence, management, and outcome of DFUs in different communities is an essential component of the quality of disease care. Additionally, these comparisons can also highlight the relationship between DFU incidence, management, and outcome and the structure of local clinical services and the availability of staff with the necessary skills. The clinical outcome is, however, also dependent on the availability of multidisciplinary care and the ability of people with DFUs to gain access to that care.

Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery 2023 guidelines on the diabetic foot

The diabetic foot interacts with anatomical, vascular, and neurological factors that challenge clinical practice. This study aimed to compile the primary scientific evidence based on a review of the main guidelines, in addition to articles published on the Embase, Lilacs, and PubMed platforms. The European Society of Cardiology system was used to develop recommendation classes and levels of evidence. The themes were divided into six chapters (Chapter 1 - Prevention of foot ulcers in people with diabetes; Chapter 2 - Pressure relief from foot ulcers in people with diabetes; Chapter 3 -Classifications of diabetic foot ulcers; Chapter 4 - Foot and peripheral artery disease; Chapter 5 - Infection and the diabetic foot; Chapter 6 - Charcot's neuroarthropathy). This version of the Diabetic Foot Guidelines presents essential recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with diabetic foot, offering an objective guide for medical practice.

Impact of wound management strategies after revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

There is no established consensus or guidelines for wound management after revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) without severe infection. This study is designed to evaluate the clinical effect of the wound management strategy on toe wounds after revascularization for CLTI.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed at eight institutions affiliated with Keio University School of Medicine in Japan and included 261 patients who underwent revascularization for CLTI between April 2019 and July 2021. We identified 132 patients with toe wounds from the database who had restored in-line blood flow to the foot. Patients were divided into two groups by the timing of toe resection after revascularization, which dictated the wound management policy. Group A (62 patients) underwent early toe amputation for suspected osteomyelitis, whereas group B (70 patients) underwent watchful waiting. The primary outcome was wound healing after revascularization; the secondary outcome was major amputation. We compared outcomes between groups A and B after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Using propensity score matching, each patient in group A (33 patients) was matched with a patient in group B (33 patients). Wound healing in matched group A was significantly better than that in matched group B (respectively: 1-year wound healing rate: 90.0% vs 68.2%, P < .001; median wound healing time: 65 days vs 258 days, P < .01). Although five major amputations were necessary in matched group B, none were required in matched group A (P = .05). The high rate of major amputations in group B was attributed to the sudden exacerbation of infection. Limb salvage rate in matched group A exceeded matched group B (100.0% vs 90.5%: 1-year limb salvage rate, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Early toe amputation for highly suspected osteomyelitis in patients with CLTI with toe wounds may expedite wound healing compared with watchful waiting, potentially avoiding unnecessary major amputation. Considering the wound management strategy is crucial when evaluating wound healing outcomes in patients with CLTI with revascularization.

Clinical practice recommendations for infectious disease management of diabetic foot infection (DFI) - 2023 SPILF

In march 2020, the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) published an update of the 2015 guidelines on the diagnosis and management of diabetic foot infection (DFI). While we (the French ID society, SPILF) endorsed some of these recommendations, we wanted to update our own 2006 guidelines and specifically provide informative elements on modalities of microbiological diagnosis and antibiotic treatment (especially first- and second-line regiments, oral switch and duration). The recommendations put forward in the present guidelines are addressed to healthcare professionals managing patients with DFI and more specifically focused on infectious disease management of this type of infection, which clearly needs a multidisciplinary approach. Staging of the severity of the infection is mandatory using the classification drawn up by the IWGDF. Microbiological samples should be taken only in the event of clinical signs suggesting infection in accordance with a strict preliminarily established protocol. Empirical antibiotic therapy should be chosen according to the IWGDF grade of infection and duration of the wound, but must always cover methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Early reevaluation of the patient is a fundamental step, and duration of antibiotic therapy can be shortened in many situations. When osteomyelitis is suspected, standard foot radiograph is the first-line imagery examination and a bone biopsy should be performed for microbiological documentation. Histological analysis of the bone sample is no longer recommended. High dosages of antibiotics are recommended in cases of confirmed osteomyelitis.

Cost-Effective Offloading of Diabetic Foot Ulcer in a Resource-Crunch Setting: A Case Report

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) pose a significant threat to people with diabetes, particularly in regions with limited healthcare resources, such as India. This case report focuses on a cost-effective offloading strategy for managing a chronic non-healing heel ulcer in a 55-year-old female with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus. While the gold standard for DFU management often involves total contact casts, this method may not be practical for all patients. Our approach involved repurposing used gloves and surgical paper tape for offloading, resulting in quick healing of the ulcer within six weeks. Achieving euglycemic status and sufficient wound debridement were key components of the treatment. This case highlights the importance of resource-efficient strategies in DFU management, especially in settings where traditional methods face practical limitations. Future research is needed to validate the efficacy of such approaches and pave the way for more accessible and effective treatments for DFUs.

Percutaneous Partial Bone Excision in the Management of Diabetic Toe Osteomyelitis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis affecting the toes is associated with several complications including amputation. Management is variable and include medical therapy alone or coupled with surgery. Removal of infected tissues is a common therapeutic option. However, limited source data are available. This study determines the outcome and complications of percutaneous partial bone excision (PPBE) of infected bone among diabetic patients with toe osteomyelitis.

METHODS

This is an uncontrolled experimental prospective study in diabetic patients who underwent PPBE of infected pieces of bone for toe osteomyelitis in the outpatient setting at a single foot clinic. All participants were followed up until the occurrence of wound healing or amputation.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (mean ± SD age was 62.8 ± 11.6 years) participated. Forty-four patients (93.6%) had complete healing and 3 (6.4%) required toe amputation. The mean (±SD) wound healing time was 11 (±4.6) (range, 7-22) weeks. Diabetes mellitus type 1 and younger age were significantly associated with increased risk for amputation.

CONCLUSION

PPBE of infected toes in diabetic patients can be performed successfully and safely in the outpatient clinic. It can also improve healing and avoids inpatient stay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort study.

Predictive Value of Radiographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics on Patient Outcomes in Confirmed Acute Osteomyelitis of the Extremities

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether imaging characteristics on plain radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and diffusion-weighted imaging are predictive of patient outcomes in cases of confirmed osteomyelitis (OM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 3 experienced musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated pathologically proven cases of acute extremity OM and recorded imaging characteristics on plain radiographs, MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging. These characteristics were then compared with the patient outcomes after a 3-year follow-up using length of stay, amputation-free survival, readmission-free survival, and overall survival using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Hazard ratio and corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported. False discovery rate-adjusted P values were reported.

RESULTS

For the 75 consecutive cases of OM in this study, multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for sex, race, age, body mass index, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and white blood cell count showed no correlation among any of the recorded characteristics on imaging and patient outcomes. Despite the high sensitivity and specificity of MRI for diagnosing OM, there was no correlation between MRI characteristics and patient outcomes. Furthermore, patients with coexistent abscess of the soft tissue or bone with OM had comparable outcomes using the previously mentioned metrics of length of stay, amputation-free survival, readmission-free survival, and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Neither radiography nor MRI features predict patient outcomes in extremity OM.

Analysis of the Influence of Diabetic Nephropathy in Patients with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

This study analyzed the influence of diabetic nephropathy on the healing prognosis after conservative surgery in diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). A retrospective observational study was carried out between January 2021 and December 2022 and involved 278 outpatients with a diagnosis of DFO at a specialized diabetic foot unit, including 74 (26.62%) patients with DN (group 2) and 204 (73.38%) patients without DN (group 1). There were 266 (95.70%) ulcers on the forefoot, 8 (2.90%) on the midfoot, and 4 (1.45%) on the hindfoot (p = 0.992). The healing rates were 85.1% (n = 63) for group 2 and 81.3% (n = 165) for group 1 (p = 0.457). When exploring the influence of DN on the risk of delayed ulcer healing, the results did not show a significant effect [12 (6; 28) weeks among patients with DN vs. 12 (6; 21) weeks among patients without DN; p = 0.576]. No significant differences were observed in complications, with one (2.59%) death occurring in group 1 (p = 0.296) and three minor amputations being performed in both groups [two (5.13%) amputations in group 1 vs. one amputation (9.09%) in group 2; p = 0.217]. Bone cultures were performed for a total of 190 patients (133 in group 1 and 57 in group 2). Of these, 176 positive bone cultures were isolated: 71 positive bone cultures (57.7%) were monomicrobial cultures in group 1, with 30 (56.6%) in group 2. There were 52 (42.3%) that had at least two microorganisms in group 1, and 23 (43.4%) in group 2 (p = 0.890). The most frequently prescribed oral antibiotic was amoxicillin/clavulanate (43.89%), followed by levofloxacin (28.4%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (14.7%). This study shows that DN does not have a significant influence on the healing prognosis of patients with DFO after conservative surgery.

Multi-Instrumental Analysis Toward Exploring the Diabetic Foot Infection Microbiota

The polymicrobial nature of diabetic foot infection (DFI) makes accurate identification of the DFI microbiota, including rapid detection of drug resistance, challenging. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to apply matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI TOF MS) technique accompanied by multiply culture conditions to determine the microbial patterns of DFIs, as well as to assess the occurrence of drug resistance among Gram-negative bacterial isolates considered a significant cause of the multidrug resistance spread. Furthermore, the results were compared with those obtained using molecular techniques (16S rDNA sequencing, multiplex PCR targeting drug resistance genes) and conventional antibiotic resistance detection methods (Etest strips). The applied MALDI-based method revealed that, by far, most of the infections were polymicrobial (97%) and involved many Gram-positive and -negative bacterial species-19 genera and 16 families in total, mostly Enterobacteriaceae (24.3%), Staphylococcaceae (20.7%), and Enterococcaceae (19.8%). MALDI drug-resistance assay was characterized by higher rate of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases producers compared to the reference methods (respectively 31% and 10% compared to 21% and 2%) and revealed that both the incidence of drug resistance and the species composition of DFI were dependent on the antibiotic therapy used. MALDI approach included antibiotic resistance assay and multiply culture conditions provides microbial identification at the level of DNA sequencing, allow isolation of both common (eg. Enterococcus faecalis) and rare (such as Myroides odoratimimus) bacterial species, and is effective in detecting antibiotic-resistance, especially those of particular interest-ESBLs and carbapenemases.

Imaging of the Diabetic Foot

Diabetic foot complications are increasingly prevalent in the world, leading to significant morbidity and driving up associated health care costs. Complex pathophysiology and suboptimal specificity of current imaging modalities have made diagnosis challenging, mainly in the evaluation of superimposed foot infection to underlying arthropathy or other marrow lesions. Recent advances in radiology and nuclear medicine have the potential to streamline the assessment of diabetic foot complications. But we must be aware of the specific strengths and weaknesses of each modality, and their applications. This review offers a comprehensive approach to the spectrum of diabetic foot complications and their imaging appearances in conventional and advanced imaging studies, including optimal technical considerations for each technique. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are highlighted, illustrating their complementary role to conventional MRI, in particular their potential impact in avoiding additional studies.

Bacterial Diversity and Antibiotic Resistance in Patients with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

This study analysed the bacterial diversity, antibiotic susceptibility, and resistance in patients with complications of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). A retrospective observational study was carried out between September 2019 and September 2022 and involved 215 outpatients with a diagnosis of DFO at a specialized diabetic foot unit. A total of 204 positive bone cultures were isolated, including 62.7% monomicrobial cultures, and 37.3% were formed with at least two microorganisms. We observed that Proteus spp., Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Corynebacterium were the most frequently isolated microorganisms and accounted for more than 10% of the DFO cases. With stratification by Gram-positive (GP) and Gram-negative (GN) bacteria, we observed that 91.6% of cultures presented at least one GP bacteria species, and 50.4% presented at least one GN bacteria species. The most common GP species were CoNS (29%), S. aureus (25.8%), and Corynebacterium spp. (14%). The most frequent GN species consisted of Proteus spp. (32%), P. aeruginosa (23.3%), and E. coli (17.5%). The main antibiotics with resistance to GP-dominated infections were penicillins without β-lactamase inhibitor, and those in GN-dominated infections were sulfonamides and penicillins without β-lactamase. Significant differences were not observed in mean healing time in DFU with acute osteomyelitis (12.76 weeks (4.50;18)) compared to chronic osteomyelitis (15.31 weeks (7;18.25); p = 0.101) and when comparing cases with soft tissue infection (15.95 (6;20)) and those without such an infection (16.59 (7.25;19.75), p = 0.618). This study shows that when treatment of DFO is based on early surgical treatment, the type of DFO and the presence of soft infection are not associated with different or worse prognoses.

Variables That Could Influence Healing Time in Patients with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

AIM

To compare the healing time in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis according to the presence or absence of clinical signs of infection, variation of blood parameters, the presence of different radiological signs, and the treatment received for the management of osteomyelitis.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was carried out in a specialised Diabetic Foot Unit between November 2014 and November 2018. A total of 116 patients with osteomyelitis were included in the study (treated by either a surgical or medical approach). During the baseline visit, we assessed the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, demographic characteristics and medical history, vascular and neurological examination, clinical signs of infection, increased blood parameters, radiological signs of osteomyelitis, and the treatment to manage osteomyelitis. We analysed the association between the presence of clinical signs of infection, variation of blood parameters, presence of radiological signs, and treatment received for management of osteomyelitis with the healing time.

RESULTS

The mean time to ulcer healing was 15.8 ± 9.7 weeks. Concerning healing times, we did not find an association with the presence of clinical signs of infection or with the increase in blood parameters, except in the case of eosinophils, which with higher values appear to increase the healing time (U = 66, z = -2.880, p = 0.004). Likewise, no relationship has been found between healing time and the appearance of the different radiological signs of osteomyelitis, nor depending on the treatment administered for the management of osteomyelitis.

CONCLUSION

High levels of eosinophils are associated with a longer healing time of diabetic foot ulcers complicated with osteomyelitis, finding no other factors related to increased healing time.

A new precise way to guide the debridement process of diabetic foot ulcer using indocyanine green fluorescence molecular imaging

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to estimate the value of a novel imaging technique in necrotic tissue debridement of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), using near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) of indocyanine green (ICG).

METHODS

The patients with DFU were included and divided into a FMI navigation debridement group and a traditional group. The FMI of the wounds and the debridement effect of each group was analyzed, including debridement frequency, length of hospital stay, and the histological examination of removed tissue.

RESULT

A total of 40 patients with DFU (23 cases in the FMI group and 17 cases in the traditional group) were included in this study. The positive rate of wound fluorescence in the FMI group was 96%, and no patients had related side effects. The pathological examination confirmed that the tissue emitting NIR fluorescence was totally necrotic tissue. In addition, the debridement frequency in the FMI group is less than that in the traditional group, but there is no difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

ICG FMI technique can accurately illuminated necrotic tissue, with high sensitivity, easy operation and good safety, which would be a new way to precisly guide the process of debridement in the clinic.

Could X-ray Predict Long-term Complications in Patients with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis?

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the association between radiologic changes on plain X-rays in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis and the development of complications at the 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study was conducted involving 115 patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis. X-ray features that were evaluated during 1-year follow-up visits included affected bone marrow, active periosteal reaction, sequestrum, cortical disruption, and other types of signs. Researchers analyzed the association between the presence of X-ray changes and complication development, such as bone or soft tissue infections, ulcer recurrence, reulceration, amputation, death, and other diabetic foot disease-related events.

RESULTS

During follow-up, of 115 patients included in the study, 33 patients (28.7%) showed radiologic changes, and 85 (73.9%) developed complications. The presence of radiologic changes after ulcer healing had a significant association with complication development during the 1-year follow-up in addition to those found at different follow-up visits. Patients who showed radiologic changes had higher percentages of complications during the 1-year follow-up, and patients without radiologic changes had lower percentages of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of radiologic changes is related to the development of complications in patients who suffer from diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

Metatranscriptome sequencing identifies Escherichia are major contributors to pathogenic functions and biofilm formation in diabetes related foot osteomyelitis

Osteomyelitis in the feet of persons with diabetes is clinically challenging and is associated with high rates of amputation. In this study RNA-sequencing was employed to explore microbial metatranscriptomes with a view to understand the relative activity and functions of the pathogen/s responsible for diabetes foot osteomyelitis (DFO). We obtained 25 intraoperative bone specimens from persons with confirmed DFO, observing that Escherichia spp. (7%), Streptomyces spp. (7%), Staphylococcus spp. (6%), Klebsiella spp. (5%) and Proteus spp. (5%) are the most active taxa on average. Data was then subset to examine functions associated with pathogenesis (virulence and toxins), biofilm formation and antimicrobial/multi-drug resistance. Analysis revealed Escherichia spp. are the most active taxa relative to pathogenic functions with K06218 (mRNA interferase relE), K03699 (membrane damaging toxin tlyC) and K03980 (putative peptidoglycan lipid II flippase murJ), K01114 (membrane damaging toxin plc) and K19168 (toxin cptA) being the most prevalent pathogenic associated transcripts. The most abundant transcripts associated with biofilm pathways included components of the biofilm EPS matrix including glycogen synthesis, cellulose synthesis, colonic acid synthesis and flagella synthesis. We further observed enrichment of a key enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of L-rhamnose (K01710 -dTDP-glucose 4,6-dehydratase rfbB, rmlB, rffG) which was present in all but four patients with DFO.

Efficacy of Early Closed Toe Amputation for Toe Ulcers with Suspected Osteomyelitis after Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

Objective: In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of early closed toe amputation on the wound management of toe ulcers with suspected osteomyelitis after revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

Methods: This retrospective study included patients who have underwent revascularization for toe ulcers associated with CLTI at Shizuoka Red Cross Hospital from 2015 to 2021. Wound management comprised early closed toe amputation for toe ulcers with suspected osteomyelitis (19 toes in 17 patients) or conservative treatment (35 toes in 26 patients). The primary endpoint was wound healing after revascularization. We compared the wound healing rate at 90 days and median healing time of early closed toe amputation versus conservative treatment.

Results: Compared with the conservative treatment, early closed toe amputation was able to achieve a better wound healing rate at 90 days (89.5% vs. 68.6%; P<0.01) and a shorter median healing time (19 days vs. 62 days; P=0.01).

Conclusion: There remains no established wound management for toe lesions associated with CLTI. Despite its several disadvantages including wound infection and possible foot deformity, early closed toe amputation for toe ulcers with suspected osteomyelitis can be considered a safe approach in terms of wound management.

Long-Term Complications after Surgical or Medical Treatment of Predominantly Forefoot Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: 1 Year Follow Up

AIM

To compare long-term complications according to the treatment received for management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (surgical or medical) at 1 year follow up.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

A prospective observational study was conducted involving 116 patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis. The patients received surgical or medical treatment based on the principles described in the literature. To register the development of a complication, both groups of treatments were followed-up 1 year after the ulcer had healed.

RESULTS

Ninety-six (82.8%) patients received surgical treatment and 20 (17.2%) medical treatment. No differences were found in the time to healing between both groups of treatment, 15.7 ± 9.2 weeks in the surgical group versus 16.4 ± 12.1 weeks in the medical group; p = 0.103. During follow up, 85 (73.3%) patients developed complications without differences between both groups, 68 (70.8%) in the surgical group versus 17 (85%) in the medical group (p = 0.193). The most common complication in both groups was re-ulceration. We did not observe significant differences comparing complication-free time survival between both treatments (p = 0.665).

CONCLUSION

The onset of complications after healing in patients who suffered from diabetic foot osteomyelitis was not associated with the treatment received. Surgical and medical approaches to the management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis produced similar results in long-term follow up.

Efficacy of sub-MIC level of meropenem and ciprofloxacin against extensive drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates of diabetic foot ulcer patients

The increasing emergence of extensive drug-resistant bacteria (XDR) among chronic diabetic foot ulcer patients (DFU) possess serious threat which leads to foot amputation. The ideal measurement estimations of the presently accessible medications are getting insufficient against extensive drug-resistant strains. For quite a long-time piperacillin monotherapy, Piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, Carbapenem class of anti-toxin, ceftalozane-Tazobactam, and so on, has been the suggested therapy towards persistent instances of diabetic foot ulcer but because of the resistance mechanism of the potent pathogens the potency and usage of the antibiotic concentration regime is under the radar. Based on this hypothesis two isolates namely VIT PC 7 &VIT PC 9 were found to be resistant to all five classes of antibiotics exhibiting extensive drug resistance (XDR). The whole-genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa VIT PC 7 and VIT PC 9 data showed the presence of various RND efflux related genes and antibiotic resistance genes. The broth microdilution assay showed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for ciprofloxacin and meropenem, Synergistic test was performed through checkerboard analysis and sub-MIC concentration of ciprofloxacin/meropenem was deduced using ∑ FICI, Time kills analysis was done for varying time interval to check the maximum reduction in CFU/ml of the bacterial cells, sub-MIC level of meropenem and ciprofloxacin showed inhibitory activity at lower concentration respectively. In vitro time-kill analysis showed the decrease in the number of cells, suggesting that the synergistic antimicrobial combinations are effective in decreasing the MIC level, and combinational test involving sub-MIC level of antibiotics also showed maximum reduction in biofilm forming cells, portraying the effectiveness of both the drugs. Accordingly, an expansion in the antimicrobial spectrum can be accomplished by utilizing the ideal measurements of ciprofloxacin/meropenem in persistent condition like diabetic foot ulcer, sub-MIC level of ciprofloxacin/meropenem could be a promising choice for anticipation against the ongoing drug-resistant crisis.

Medical Versus Surgical Treatment for the Management of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review

A systematic review and quality assessment was performed to assess the management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis by medical or surgical treatment. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was used. All selected studies were evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool to assess the risk of bias for randomized controlled trials. The literature was revised using PubMed (Medline) and Embase (Elsevier) up to September 2020 to identify clinical trials assessing medical or surgical treatment to manage diabetic foot osteomyelitis. A total of six clinical trials that met our inclusion criteria, with a total of 308 participants. Healing rate, complete closure of the wound, and type of complications were the outcomes evaluated. Risk of bias assessment showed that only two of the six clinical trials included in the systematic review had a low risk of bias. Based on our findings, we believe that the management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis remains challenging. There are few high-quality clinical trials that both stratify clinical presentations and compare these treatments. We conclude that the available evidence is insufficient to identify the best option to cure diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

Conservative surgery for chronic diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Procedures and recommendations

Osteomyelitis (OM) is the most frequent infection associated with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) that typically involve the forefoot, the most common location of DFU. Conservative surgical procedures could be attractive alternative that reduces minor and major amputations and avoid future recurrence thus preserving the functionally of the foot. This review aimed to analyze and describe the current evidence on conservative diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) surgical procedures depending on DFU location and indications. A narrative revision of the evidence was carried out by searching Medline through PubMed databases from inception to late July 2020 to identify retrospective, prospective, and randomized controlled trials pertaining to conservative DFO procedures on the forefoot. Seven types of conservative surgical procedures for DFO treatment in the forefoot are described in this review: (1) partial or total distal phalangectomy, (2) arthroplasty of the proximal or distal interphalangeal joint, (3) distal Syme amputation, (4) percutaneous flexor tenotomy, (5) sesamoidectomy, (6) arthroplasty of the metatarsophalangeal joint, and (7) metatarsal head resection. When indicated, conservative surgery for DFUs in patients with chronic forefoot OM is a safe and effective option that increases the chances of healing and reduces the possibility of limb loss and death compared with radical amputation procedures. Since a lack of sufficient evidence supporting this procedure exists, future investigations should be focused on the random clinical trial (RCT) design. The results of prospective trials could help surgeons select the appropriate procedure in each case in order to minimize complications.

Local Antibiotic Delivery Systems in the Surgical Treatment of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Again, No Benefit?

This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes and healing parameters of 3 groups of surgical treatment combined with and without local antibiotic administration in diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). Overall, 25 patients with DFO who met the criteria were included in the study. Surgical debridement was used with systemic antibiotic administration alone (group A; n = 8) or combined with local application of antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate beads (group B; n = 9) or antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite and calcium sulfate beads (group C; n = 8). In total, 87.5% patients in group A, 100% in group B, and 87.5% in group C healed (P = .543). Median time to healing was 17 weeks in group A, 18 weeks in group B, and 19 weeks in group C (P = .094). One patient (12.5%) in group A was amputated. DFO recurrence rate was 12.5% in group A and 12.5% in group C (P = .543). Median hospitalization was 9 days in group A, 8 days in group B, and 9 days in group C (P = .081). In conclusion, adjunctive local antibiotic therapy was not shown to improve outcomes in surgically treated DFO.

Role of inflammatory markers in the healing time of diabetic foot osteomyelitis treated by surgery or antibiotics

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the predictive role of inflammatory markers in the healing time of diabetic foot osteomyelitis treated by surgery or antibiotics.

METHODS

An observational study of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and clinically suspected osteomyelitis. The patients underwent surgical or antibiotic treatment for bone infection in a specialised diabetic foot unit. Blood samples were taken from each patient to analyse biomarkers. The main outcome was the number of weeks until healing occurred.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients took part in the study. The number of weeks until healing was similar for both groups (surgical n=96 and antiobiotic n=20, treatments). No association was observed among biomarkers as predictors of time-to-healing.

CONCLUSION

There is not enough evidence to define the prognostic role of inflammatory markers in the healing time of DFUs complicated with diabetic foot osteomyelitis, regardless of the treatment administered.

Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update)

The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has published evidence-based guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease since 1999. This guideline is on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes and updates the 2015 IWGDF infection guideline. On the basis of patient, intervention, comparison, outcomes (PICOs) developed by the infection committee, in conjunction with internal and external reviewers and consultants, and on systematic reviews the committee conducted on the diagnosis of infection (new) and treatment of infection (updated from 2015), we offer 27 recommendations. These cover various aspects of diagnosing soft tissue and bone infection, including the classification scheme for diagnosing infection and its severity. Of note, we have updated this scheme for the first time since we developed it 15 years ago. We also review the microbiology of diabetic foot infections, including how to collect samples and to process them to identify causative pathogens. Finally, we discuss the approach to treating diabetic foot infections, including selecting appropriate empiric and definitive antimicrobial therapy for soft tissue and for bone infections, when and how to approach surgical treatment, and which adjunctive treatments we think are or are not useful for the infectious aspects of diabetic foot problems. For this version of the guideline, we also updated four tables and one figure from the 2016 guideline. We think that following the principles of diagnosing and treating diabetic foot infections outlined in this guideline can help clinicians to provide better care for these patients.

Management of diabetic foot infections in the light of recent literature and new international guidelines

Introduction: In May 2019 the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) launched their quadrennially updated guidelines on the management of diabetic foot infections (DFIs). Concomitantly, the number of new publications regarding DFI increased.Areas covered: The IWGDF committee developed and addressed key questions and produced evidence-based recommendations related to diagnosing and treating DFIs. This narrative review provides an overview of this new guideline and also of other recently published literature in the field of DFIs.Expert opinion: The 2019 IWGDF guidelines provide an authoritative, international, evidence-based approach to diagnosing and treating DFIs. The 27 recommendations are supported by systematic reviews of both diagnosis and interventions. Our review of this guideline, along with other recent publications in the field, allows us to offer state-of-the-art guidance for caring for these difficult infections. As the evidence base for management of DFIs remains suboptimal, we need further research to improve the management of DFIs.

Preventative and early intervention diabetes-related foot care practices in primary care

The aim of this study was to identify current preventative and early intervention diabetes-related foot care practices among Australian primary care healthcare professionals. A survey was developed to obtain information about preventative and early intervention foot care actions, priorities of care, access and referral to expert multidisciplinary foot care teams and adherence to best-practice diabetes-related foot care recommendations. The survey was distributed to GPs and Credentialled Diabetes Educators (CDEs). Surveys were completed by 10 GPs and 84 CDEs. Only 45% of all respondents reported removing the shoes and socks of their patients with diabetes at a consultation. Eighty-one percent of participants reported having access to specialist multidisciplinary foot care teams. Those in urban settings were significantly more likely to report access than those in rural areas (P=0.04). Median scores indicated that participants did not often utilise specialist teams to refer patients with diabetes-related foot ulceration and Charcot’s neuroarthropathy. Only 16% of participants reported having access to specialist foot care telehealth services; patients with diabetes-related foot ulceration and Charcot’s neuroarthropathy were rarely referred to these services. This study is the first Australian study to elicit information about preventative and early intervention diabetes-related foot care practices by GPs and CDEs working in Australian primary care. In the presence of acute diabetes-related foot complications, primary healthcare practitioners are not always adhering to best practice foot care recommendations. Further studies are required to understand the reasons for this and ensure evidence-based best practice foot care delivery to people with diabetes.

The Characteristics and Mortality of Osteoporosis, Osteomyelitis, or Rheumatoid Arthritis in the Diabetes Population: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes mellitus are prone to develop osteoporosis, osteomyelitis, or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Furthermore, the presence of these complications in those with diabetes may lead to higher mortality. The aim of our study was to assess characteristics and mortality of osteoporosis, osteomyelitis, or rheumatoid arthritis in individuals with diabetes.

METHODS

We analyzed osteoporosis, osteomyelitis, and RA deaths associated with diabetes from 1999-2017 using the CDC WONDER system (CDC WONDER; https://wonder.cdc.gov). We used ICD-10 codes to categorize the underlying and contributing causes of death. Crude mortality rates (CMR) and age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 1,000,000 person-years were calculated.

RESULTS

The AAMR for osteoporosis in the population with diabetes was significantly higher in females (AAMR: 4.17, 95% CI: 4.10-4.24) than in males (AAMR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.07-1.16). Deaths due to osteoporosis increased gradually from 1999, peaked in 2003 (AAMR: 3.78, 95% CI: 3.55-4.00), and reached a nadir in 2016 (AAMR: 2.32, 95% CI: 2.15-2.48). The AAMR for RA associated with diabetes was slightly higher in females (AAMR: 4.04, 95% CI: 3.98-4.11) than in males (AAMR: 2.45, 95% CI: 2.39-2.51). The mortality rate due to RA increased slightly from 1999 (AAMR: 3.18, 95% CI: 2.97-3.39) to 2017 (AAMR: 3.20, 95% CI: 3.02-3.38). The AAMR for osteomyelitis associated with diabetes was higher in males (AAMR: 4.36, 95% CI: 4.28-4.44) than in females (AAMR: 2.31, 95% CI: 2.26-2.36). From 1999 to 2017, the AAMR from osteomyelitis in this population was 2.63 (95% CI: 2.44-2.82) per 1,000,000 person-years in 1999 and 4.25 (95% CI: 4.05-4.46) per 1,000,000 person-years in 2017.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an increase in the age-adjusted mortality rates of RA and osteomyelitis and a decrease of osteoporosis associated with diabetes from 1999 to 2017. We suggest that increased attention should therefore be given to these diseases in the population with diabetes, especially in efforts to develop preventative and treatment strategies.

Clinical experience with surgical debridement and simultaneous meshed skin grafts in treating biofilm-associated infection: an exploratory retrospective pilot study

Current treatment guidelines for biofilm-associated infections (BAI) recommend repeated sharp/surgical debridement followed by treatment with antimicrobial agents until the wound becomes self-sustaining in terms of a positive wound-healing trajectory. However, complete removal of a biofilm is unlikely, and biofilms reform rapidly. We have treated BAI in patients with chronic diabetic ulcers using a meshed skin graft combined with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) immediately after surgical debridement, rather than waiting until the development of clean and healthy granulation tissue; the purpose of this exploratory study was to report the clinical results of this treatment strategy. This retrospective study included 75 patients with chronic diabetic ulcers who were treated for BAI by using surgical debridement, simultaneous meshed skin grafts, and NPWT. Healing time along with the percentage of complete wound closure within 12 weeks were evaluated; bacteria isolated from the wounds and their relation to the wound healing rate were investigated. All 75 wounds healed successfully, and the mean time for complete wound healing was 3.5 ± 1.8 weeks. In particular, 76% of wounds healed uneventfully without graft loss. A mean of 3.3 bacterial colonies/wound were isolated; however, no significant difference in wound healing was observed between the monomicrobial and polymicrobial groups. This exploratory study suggests that surgical debridement and simultaneous meshed skin grafts combined with NPWT may be successfully used to combat BAI in patients with chronic diabetic ulcers. We look forward to larger pivotal studies to confirm or refute these initially promising findings.

Surgical Diabetic Foot Debridement: Improving Training and Practice Utilizing the Traffic Light Principle

Comprehensive management of a severe diabetic foot infection focus on clear treatment pathways. Including rapid, radical debridement of all infection in addition to intravenous antibiotics and supportive measures. However, inexperienced surgeons can often underestimate the extent of infection, risking inadequate debridement, repeated theatre episodes, higher hospital morbidity, and hospital length of stay (LOS). This study aims to assess protocolized diabetic-foot-debridement: Red-Amber-Green (RAG) model as part of a value-based driven intervention. The model highlights necrotic/infected tissue (red-zone, nonviable), followed by areas of moderate damage (amber-zone), healthy tissue (green-zone, viable). Sequential training of orthopedic surgeons supporting our emergency service was undertaken prior to introduction. We compared outcomes before/after RAG introduction (pre-RAG, n = 48; post- RAG, n = 35). Outcomes measured included: impact on number of debridement/individual admission, percentage of individuals requiring multiple debridement, and length-of-hospital-stay as a function-of-cost. All-patients fulfilled grade 2/3, stage-B, of the Texas-Wound-Classification. Those with evidence of ischemia were excluded. The pre-RAG-group were younger (53.8 ± 11.0 years vs 60.3 ± 9.2 years, P = .01); otherwise the 2-groups were matched: HbA1c, white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein. The post-RAG-group underwent significantly lower numbers of debridement's (1.1 ± 0.3 vs 1.5 ± 0.6/individual admission, P = .003); equired fewer visits to theatre (8.6% vs 38%, P = .003), their LOS was reduced (median LOS pre-RAG 36.0 vs post-RAG 21.5 days, P = .02). RAG facilitates infection clearance, fewer theatre-episodes, and shorter LOS. This protocolized-management-tools in acute severely infected diabetic foot infection offers benefits to patients and health-care-gain.

Infected bone resection plus adjuvant antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate versus infected bone resection alone in the treatment of diabetic forefoot osteomyelitis

Background

Managing with diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is challenging. Even after infective bone resection and thorough debridement, DFO is still difficult to cure and has a high recurrence rate. This retrospective study aims to compare the outcomes of two treatment methods, infected bone resection combined with adjuvant antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate and infected bone resection alone, for the treatment of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

Methods

Between 2015 to 2017, 48 limbs (46 patients) with DFO met the criteria were included for assessment. 20 limbs (18 patients) were included in the calcium sulfate group (the CS group) in which vancomycin and/or gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate was used as an adjuvant after infected bone resection while 28 limbs (28 patients) as the control group were undergone infected bone resection only. Systemic antibiotics, postoperative wound care and offloading were continued to be applied following surgery in both groups. The time to healing, healing rate, recurrence rate and amputation rate were compared between the two groups.

Results

In total, 90% (18/20) limbs in the CS group as compared to 78.6% (22/28) infected limbs in the control group went to heal (P = 0.513). The Mean time to healing was 13.3 weeks in the CS group and 11.2 weeks in control group (P = 0.132). Osteomyelitis recurrence rate was 0% (0/18) in the CS group and 36.4% (8/22) in the control group (P = 0.014). Postoperative leakage in calcium sulfate group was 30.0% (6/20) with a mean duration of 8.5 weeks. Amputation rate in the control group was 7.1% (2/28) compared to 0% (0/20) in the CS group (P = 0.153).

Conclusions

Antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate as an adjuvant prevents the recurrence of DFO but cannot improve the healing rate, reduce the postoperative amputation rate or shorten the time to healing. Prolonged postoperative leakage as the most common complication can be managed with regular dressing.

Level of Evidence

III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on antibiotic treatment for osteomyelitis in diabetes

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in osteomyelitis treatment among people with diabetes.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, AMED, Web of Science, the WHO trial registry, Cochrane library databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov, in addition to hand-searching, was undertaken in July 2018. Two reviewers independently extracted data. The studies' methodological quality was assessed using the modified Jadad scale. Descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials, with 393 participants in total, were included. The antibiotic regimens, treatments and follow-up durations varied among the trials. The total scores showed that the overall methodological quality of the seven studies was high, despite two studies showing some flaws in double-blinding and withdrawals/drop-outs. Of four studies comparing different antibiotic regimens, three implied a similar remission effect, while one implied that ertapenem ± vancomycin treatment showed a higher remission rate than tigecycline treatment; this conclusion was not robust because of low power and small sample size. In the other three studies, which included two different doses of ciprofloxacin, an antibiotics group and a conservative surgical group, and two durations of the same antibiotic strategy, no significant differences in remission were reported between the groups. No difference was observed in the analyses of microbiological outcomes, superinfections and relapse, except adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no definitive evidence supporting the superiority of any particular antibiotic agent, dose, or administration duration in the treatment of osteomyelitis in diabetes. As the included studies had some flaws and limitations, further research is necessary.

Optimal management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: challenges and solutions

Purpose: Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is the most frequent infection associated with diabetic foot ulcers, occurs in >20% of moderate infections and 50%-60% of severe infections, and is associated with high rates of amputation. DFO represents a challenge in both diagnosis and therapy, and many consequences of its condition are related to late diagnosis, delayed referral, or ill-indicated treatment. This review aimed to analyze the current evidence on DFO management and to discuss advantages and disadvantages of different treatment options. Methods: A narrative review of the evidence was begun by searching Medline and PubMed databases for studies using the keywords "management", "diabetic foot", "osteomyelitis", and "diabetic foot osteomyelitis" from 2008 to 2018. Results: We found a great variety of studies focusing on both medical and surgical therapies showing a similar rate of effectiveness and outcomes; however, the main factors in choosing one over the other seem to be associated with the presence of soft-tissue infection or ischemia and the clinical presentation of DFO. Conclusion: Further randomized controlled trials with large samples and long-term follow-up are necessary to demonstrate secondary outcomes, such as recurrence, recurrent ulceration, and reinfection associated with both medical and surgical options.

Modern management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. The when, how and why of conservative approaches

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) has long been considered a complex infection that is both difficult to diagnose and treat, and is associated with a high rate of relapse and limb loss. Areas covered: DFO can usually be diagnosed by a combination of clinical evaluation, serum inflammatory markers and plain X-ray. When the results of these procedures are negative or contradictory, advanced imaging tests or bone biopsy may be necessary. Staphylococcus aureus remains the most frequent microorganism isolated from bone specimens, but infection is often polymicrobial. Antibiotic therapy, preferably with oral agents guided by results of bone culture, for a duration of no more than six weeks, appears to be as safe and effective as surgery in cases of uncomplicated forefoot DFO. Surgery (which should be limb-sparing when possible) is always required for DFO accompanied by necrotizing fasciitis, deep abscess, gangrene or in cases not responding (either clinically or radiographically) to apparently appropriate antibiotic treatment. Expert commentary: Research in the past decade has improved diagnosis and treatment of DFO, and most cases can now be managed with a 'conservative' approach, defined as treatment either exclusively with antibiotics or with surgery removing as little bone and soft tissue as necessary.

Treatment options for diabetic foot osteomyelitis

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis therapeutical options are based on antibiotic therapy and surgical resection of the infected bone(s). Surgical and medical approaches of patients suffering from a diabetic foot osteomyelitis do not oppose but are complementary and need to be discussed as a tailored manner. Areas covered: The aim of the present article is to discuss data issued from the most recent guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot on the management of the diabetic foot infection and from a search in the current literature using the terms diabetic foot osteomyelitis and treatment/therapy/therapeutical in both PubMed and Medline, restricted to the last five years. Expert opinion: Surgical removal of the entire infected bone(s) has been considered in the past as the standard treatment but medical approach of these patients has now proven efficacy in selected situations. The current emergence of bacteria, especially among Gram negative rods, resistant to almost all the available antibiotics gradually augments the complexity of the management of these patients and is likely to decrease the place of the medical approach and to worsen the outcome of these infections in the next future.

Nonsurgical Treatment of Osteomyelitis of the Hallux Sesamoids: A Case Series and Literature Review

The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of nonsurgical treatment for osteomyelitis of the hallucal sesamoids. Osteomyelitis of the hallucal sesamoids in young and healthy patients is rare and might originate from hematogenous spread or after a puncture wound. In diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy, it often results from direct contiguous seeding from adjacent ulceration. The superiority of surgical versus nonsurgical therapy is still debated. In our institution, all patients presenting with osteomyelitis of the hallucal sesamoids are first treated nonsurgically but eventually usually require a surgical procedure. We reviewed 18 patients with a clinical and radiologic diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the hallucal sesamoids treated in our institution during a 13-year period (from January 2000 to December 2012). The inclusion criteria were a signal alteration on magnetic resonance imaging or bone lesions on computed tomography or conventional radiographs, combined with a deep ulcer with a positive probe-to-bone test. Nonsurgical therapy consisted of frequent wound treatment, immobilization, offloading in a cast or other orthotic device, and oral antibiotics. Of the 18 patients, 11 had diabetes, 16 had peripheral neuropathy, 11 had peripheral arterial disease, and 5 had immunosuppression. After a period of nonsurgical therapy ranging from 4 weeks to 9 months, 15 of 18 patients required surgical excision, internal resection, or amputation. In this patient population, we no longer consider nonsurgical therapy a viable option. Patients should be advised, before starting nonsurgical treatment, that the therapy will be long and demanding and very often results in a surgical procedure.

Diagnostic and therapeutic update on diabetic foot osteomyelitis

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is the most common infection associated to diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). This review is designed to provide an update on the diagnosis and treatment of DFO based on an analysis of MEDLINE through PubMed using as search criterion "Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis". Authors have included in this review the most relevant manuscripts regarding diagnosis and treatment of DFO. After review and critical analysis of publications, it may be concluded that diagnosis of DFO is not simple because of its heterogeneous presentation. Clinical inflammatory signs, probe-to-bone test, and plain X-rays are postulated as the basic tests for clinical diagnosis when DFO is suspected. Diagnosis should be supported by laboratory tests, of which ESR (>70mm/h) has been shown to be most precise. MRI is the most accurate imaging test, especially for differential diagnosis with Charcot foot. Pathogen isolation by bone culture is essential when the patient is treated with ATB only. Medical or surgical treatment should be based on the clinical characteristics of the patient and the lesion. Surgery should always be an option if medical treatment fails.

The microbiology of diabetic foot infections in patients recently treated with antibiotic therapy: A prospective study from India

AIM

Clinicians often treat clinically infected diabetic foot ulcers without information from cultures of the wound. The results of wound cultures may also be affected by previous antibiotic therapy. Thus, we aimed to study the microbial isolates, and antimicrobial sensitivity of previously treated patients with a clinically infected DFU.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

293 consecutive patients with clinically infected DFU on prior antimicrobial treatment within the immediate past few days for a duration greater than one week were evaluated for microbial etiology, antibiotic sensitivity and final outcomes. Appropriate tissue samples i.e. purulent drainage, soft-tissue and/ or bone were obtained for aerobic/anaerobic cultures and antimicrobial sensitivities. 71 patients with missing prior antibiotic data were excluded.

RESULTS

313 tissue samples obtained from 222 patients isolated 317 causative organisms. Most of the culture results from tissue specimens were mono-microbial (93.2%) compared to 37% in our previous cohort of 60 patients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common organism isolated on culture of bone (26.9%) or soft tissue (23.2%) specimen, respectively. Only 23% and 64% of P. aeruginosa isolates and 5.6% and 44% of Acinetobacter sp. were sensitive to quinolones and cephalosporins, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically infected DFU recently treated with antibiotics have predominant monomicrobial and multi drug-resistant infection. Quinolones as an empirical antibiotic choice may not be appropriate in this setting.

Optimising the quality and outcomes of treatments for diabetic foot infections

INTRODUCTION

Infection is the commonest foot complication that arises in people with diabetes and may lead to amputation and even death. The emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria, especially in Gram negative rods, may have a negative impact on the chances of cure in these patients.

AREAS COVERED

We searched the Medline and Pubmed databases for studies using the keywords 'diabetic foot infection' and 'diabetic foot osteomyelits' from 1980 to 2016. Expert commentary: Much has been done in the field of diabetic foot infection regarding pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. The construction of multidisciplinary teams is probably the most efficient way to improve the patients' outcome. The rational use of antibiotics and surgical skills are essential in these potentially severe infections. Each case of diabetic infection deserves to be discussed in the light of the current guidelines and the local resources. Because of the overal poor outcome of these infections, prevention remains a priority.

Consensus on surgical aspects of managing osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop consensus statements that may help share or even establish 'best practices' in the surgical aspects of managing diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) that can be applied in appropriate clinical situations pending the publication of more high-quality data.

METHODS

We asked 14 panelists with expertise in DFO management to participate. Delphi methodology was used to develop consensus statements. First, a questionnaire elicited practices and beliefs concerning various aspects of the surgical management of DFO. Thereafter, we constructed 63 statements for analysis and, using a nine-point Likert scale, asked the panelists to indicate the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with the statements. We defined consensus as a mean score of greater than 7.0.

RESULTS

The panelists reached consensus on 38 items after three rounds. Among these, seven provide guidance on initial diagnosis of DFO and selection of patients for surgical management. Another 15 statements provide guidance on specific aspects of operative management, including the timing of operations and the type of specimens to be obtained. Ten statements provide guidance on postoperative management, including wound closure and offloading, and six statements summarize the panelists' agreement on general principles for surgical management of DFO.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus statement on the perioperative management of DFO were formed with an expert panel comprised of a variety of surgical specialties. We believe these statements may serve as 'best practice' guidelines until properly performed studies provide more robust evidence to support or refute specific surgical management steps in DFO.

One step closer to understanding the role of bacteria in diabetic foot ulcers: characterising the microbiome of ulcers

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to characterise the microbiome of new and recurrent diabetic foot ulcers using 16S amplicon sequencing (16S AS), allowing the identification of a wider range of bacterial species that may be important in the development of chronicity in these debilitating wounds. Twenty patients not receiving antibiotics for the past three months were selected, with swabs taken from each individual for culture and 16S AS. DNA was isolated using a combination of bead beating and kit extraction. Samples were sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform.

RESULTS

Conventional laboratory culture showed positive growth from only 55 % of the patients, whereas 16S AS was positive for 75 % of the patients (41 unique genera, representing 82 different operational taxonomic units (OTU's). S. aureus was isolated in 72 % of culture-positive samples, whereas the most commonly detected bacteria in all ulcers were Peptoniphilus spp., Anaerococcus spp. and Corynebacterium spp., with the addition of Staphylococcus spp. in new ulcers. The majority of OTU's residing in both new and recurrent ulcers (over 67 %) were identified as facultative or strict anaerobic Gram-positive organisms. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed no difference in clustering between the two groups (new and recurrent ulcers).

CONCLUSIONS

The abundance of anaerobic bacteria has important implications for treatment as it suggests that the microbiome of each ulcer "starts afresh" and that, although diverse, are not distinctly different from one another with respect to new or recurrent ulcers. Therefore, when considering antibiotic therapy the duration of current ulceration may be a more important consideration than a history of healed ulcer.

Surgical treatment strategy for diabetic forefoot osteomyelitis

The aim of this study was to propose an appropriate surgical treatment for diabetic forefoot osteomyelitis (DFO) involving ischemia or moderate to severe soft tissue infection. The records of 28 patients with osteomyelitis from 2009 to 2015 were retrospectively studied. All patients had undergone surgery based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging examinations and histopathological or culture analyses confirming the surgical bone margin. The appropriate surgical margin, crucial factors for early healing, and prognosis after complete resection of osteomyelitis were examined. After healing, patients were followed up to assess prognosis (range 32-1,910 days, median 546 days). The healing rate of nonischemic cases of DFO with negative surgical margins was 100% and that of ischemic cases was 84.6%; the ambulatory rates for both types of cases were 100%. No wound (and/or osteomyelitis) recurrence was observed. Nine new cases of DFO developed in six patients (21.4%; eight were due to vascular stenosis, and one was due to biomechanical changes in the foot. After complete resection of osteomyelitis, preoperative and postoperative C-reactive protein levels and the size of the ulcer were significant predictors of early healing (p < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.05, respectively). The appropriate surgical margin should be set in the area of bone marrow edema, based on magnetic resonance imaging examinations after revascularization. In cases with high preoperative or postoperative C-reactive protein levels, long-term antibiotic therapy is recommended, and surgery should be planned after the C-reactive protein levels decrease, except in emergencies.

Diabetic foot infections: Current treatment and delaying the 'post-antibiotic era'

BACKGROUND

Treatment for diabetic foot infections requires properly diagnosing infection, obtaining an appropriate specimen for culture, assessing for any needed surgical procedures and selecting an empiric antibiotic regimen. Therapy will often need to be modified based on results of culture and sensitivity testing. Because of excessive and inappropriate use of antibiotics for treating diabetic foot infections, resistance to the usually employed bacteria has been increasing to alarming levels.

REVIEW

This article reviews recommendations from evidence-based guidelines, informed by results of systematic reviews, on treating diabetic foot infections. Data from the pre-antibiotic era reported rates of mortality of about 9% and of high-level leg amputations of about 70%. Outcomes have greatly improved with appropriate antibiotic therapy. While there are now many oral and parenteral antibiotic agents that have demonstrated efficacy in treating diabetic foot infections, the rate of infection with multidrug-resistant pathogens is growing. This problem requires a multi-focal approach, including providing education to both clinicians and patients, developing robust antimicrobial stewardship programmes and using new diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. Recently, new methods have been developed to find novel antibiotic agents and to resurrect old treatments, like bacteriophages, for treating these difficult infections.

CONCLUSION

Medical and political leaders have recognized the serious global threat posed by the growing problem of antibiotic resistance. By a multipronged approach that includes exerting administrative pressure on clinicians to do the right thing, investing in new technologies and encouraging the profitable development of new antimicrobials, we may be able to stave off the coming 'post-antibiotic era'.

Conservative treatment in a patient with diabetic osteomyelitis: antibiotic treatment is sufficient for complete bone regeneration in selected cases

Diabetic foot ulcers are commonly complicated by bone involvement and osteomyelitis. Diagnosing diabetic osteomyelitis can be problematic. However, positive findings at clinical examination and X-ray may set the diagnosis. Recent guidelines suggest that selected cases of diabetic osteomyelitis can be treated conservatively with antibiotics. We report on the successful treatment of a 52-year-old man with diabetes with osteomyelitis in the distal phalanx of a toe. On X-ray, the affected phalanx appeared completely eroded. However, regeneration of the bone tissue was observed following outpatient treatment with antibiotics. We therefore encourage doctors to provide conservative treatment for selected cases of diabetic osteomyelitis.

Predictors of Outcomes in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis Treated Initially With Conservative (Nonsurgical) Medical Management

The optimal way to manage diabetic foot osteomyelitis remains uncertain, with debate in the literature as to whether it should be managed conservatively (ie, nonsurgically) or surgically. We aimed to identify clinical variables that influence outcomes of nonsurgical management in diabetic foot osteomyelitis. We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive patients with diabetes presenting to a tertiary center between 2007 and 2011 with foot osteomyelitis initially treated with nonsurgical management. Remission was defined as wound healing with no clinical or radiological signs of osteomyelitis at the initial or contiguous sites 12 months after clinical and/or radiological resolution. Nine demographic and clinical variables including osteomyelitis site and presence of foot pulses were analyzed. We identified 100 cases, of which 85 fulfilled the criteria for analysis. After a 12-month follow-up period, 54 (63.5%) had achieved remission with nonsurgical management alone with a median (interquartile range) duration of antibiotic treatment of 10.8 (10.1) weeks. Of these, 14 (26%) were admitted for intravenous antibiotics. The absence of pedal pulses in the affected foot (n = 34) was associated with a significantly longer duration of antibiotic therapy to achieve remission, 8.7 (7.1) versus 15.9 (13.3) weeks ( P = .003). Osteomyelitis affecting the metatarsal was more likely to be amputated than other sites of the foot ( P = .016). In line with previous data, we have shown that almost two thirds of patients presenting with osteomyelitis healed without undergoing surgical bone resection.

The deteriorating DFU: prioritising risk factors to avoid amputation

The risk of amputation in a deteriorating diabetic foot ulcer is high. This article identifies the three major risk factors associated with such an infection--tissue loss, ischaemia and infection--and explains how to identify which risk is most prominent, and what to do to reduce the risk of amputation. Examples are included of how this approach has led to successful patient outcomes.

Managing infection: a holistic approach

All wound infection presents risks for the patient, but the risks are multiplied in the presence of a comorbidity such as diabetes, when they can potentially be fatal. Where diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) infection is concerned, early recognition is crucial. Prompt treatment, comprising wound cleansing, debridement of devitalised tissue and use of antimicrobial dressings, can stop locally infected ulcers from deteriorating further.