Comparison of subcutaneous soluble human insulin and insulin analogues (AspB9, GluB27; AspB10; AspB28) on meal-related plasma glucose excursions in type I diabetic subjects

Insulin Centennial: Milestones influencing the development of insulin preparations since 1922

During 1921 to 1922, a team effort by Banting, Macleod, Collip and Best isolated and purified insulin and demonstrated its life-giving properties, giving rise to the birth of insulin therapy. In the early years (1922-1950), priorities revolved around the manufacture of insulin to meet demand, improving purity to avoid allergic reactions, establishing insulin standards and increasing its duration of action to avoid multiple daily injections. Shortly after the emergence of insulin, Joslin and Allen advocated the need to achieve and maintain good glycaemic control to realize its full potential. Although this view was opposed by some during a dark period in the history of insulin, it was subsequently endorsed some 60 years later endorsed by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. Major scientific advances by the Nobel Laureates Sanger, Hodgkin, Yalow and Gilbert and also by Steiner have revolutionized the understanding of diabetes and facilitated major advances in insulin therapy. The more recent advent of recombinant technology over the last 40 years has provided the potential for unlimited source of insulin, and the ability to generate various insulin 'analogues', in an attempt to better replicate normal insulin secretory patterns. The emerging biosimilars now provide the opportunity to improve availability at a lower cost.

One-hundred year evolution of prandial insulin preparations: From animal pancreas extracts to rapid-acting analogs

The first insulin preparation injected in humans in 1922 was short-acting, extracted from animal pancreas, contaminated by impurities. Ever since the insulin extracted from animal pancreas has been continuously purified, until an unlimited synthesis of regular human insulin (RHI) became possible in the '80s using the recombinant-DNA (rDNA) technique. The rDNA technique then led to the designer insulins (analogs) in the early '90s. Rapid-acting insulin analogs were developed to accelerate the slow subcutaneous (sc) absorption of RHI, thus lowering the 2-h post-prandial plasma glucose (PP-PG) and risk for late hypoglycemia as comparing with RHI. The first rapid-acting analog was lispro (in 1996), soon followed by aspart and glulisine. Rapid-acting analogs are more convenient than RHI: they improve early PP-PG, and 24-h PG and A1C as long as basal insulin is also optimized; they lower the risk of late PP hypoglycemia and they allow a shorter time-interval between injection and meal. Today rapid-acting analogs are the gold standard prandial insulins. Recently, even faster analogs have become available (faster aspart, ultra-rapid lispro) or are being studied (Biochaperone lispro), making additional gains in lowering PP-PG. Rapid-acting analogs are recommended in all those with type 1 and type 2 diabetes who need prandial insulin replacement.

Structural Lessons From the Mutant Proinsulin Syndrome

Insight into folding mechanisms of proinsulin has been provided by analysis of dominant diabetes-associated mutations in the human insulin gene (INS). Such mutations cause pancreatic β-cell dysfunction due to toxic misfolding of a mutant proinsulin and impairment in trans of wild-type insulin secretion. Anticipated by the "Akita" mouse (a classical model of monogenic diabetes mellitus; DM), this syndrome illustrates the paradigm endoreticulum (ER) stress leading to intracellular proteotoxicity. Diverse clinical mutations directly or indirectly perturb native disulfide pairing leading to protein misfolding and aberrant aggregation. Although most introduce or remove a cysteine (Cys; leading in either case to an unpaired thiol group), non-Cys-related mutations identify key determinants of folding efficiency. Studies of such mutations suggest that the hormone's evolution has been constrained not only by structure-function relationships, but also by the susceptibility of its single-chain precursor to impaired foldability. An intriguing hypothesis posits that INS overexpression in response to peripheral insulin resistance likewise leads to chronic ER stress and β-cell dysfunction in the natural history of non-syndromic Type 2 DM. Cryptic contributions of conserved residues to folding efficiency, as uncovered by rare genetic variants, define molecular links between biophysical principles and the emerging paradigm of Darwinian medicine: Biosynthesis of proinsulin at the edge of non-foldability provides a key determinant of "diabesity" as a pandemic disease of civilization.

Diabetes mellitus due to toxic misfolding of proinsulin variants

BACKGROUND

Dominant mutations in the human insulin gene (INS) lead to pancreatic β-cell dysfunction and diabetes mellitus (DM) due to toxic misfolding of a mutant proinsulin. Analogous to a classical mouse model of monogenic DM ("Akita"), this syndrome highlights the susceptibility of β-cells to endoreticulum (ER) stress due to protein misfolding and aberrant aggregation.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

Diverse clinical mutations directly or indirectly perturb native disulfide pairing. Whereas most introduce or remove a cysteine (Cys; leading in either case to an unpaired thiol group), non-Cys-related mutations identify key determinants of folding efficiency. Studies of such mutations suggest that the hormone's evolution has been constrained not only by structure-function relationships but also by the susceptibility of its single-chain precursor to impaired foldability. An intriguing hypothesis posits that INS overexpression in response to peripheral insulin resistance likewise leads to chronic ER stress and β-cell dysfunction in the natural history of nonsyndromic Type 2 DM.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

Cryptic contributions of conserved residues to folding efficiency, as uncovered by rare genetic variants, define molecular links between biophysical principles and the emerging paradigm of Darwinian medicine: Biosynthesis of proinsulin at the edge of nonfoldability provides a key determinant of "diabesity" as a pandemic disease of civilization.

A survey of physician experience and treatment satisfaction using fast-acting insulin aspart in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes

AIMS

This survey aimed to explore real-world physician experiences and treatment satisfaction with fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) in clinical practice across Europe and Canada.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online web-based survey was used for physicians treating people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. General practitioners and specialists, with experience using faster aspart, were interviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 191 physicians participated in the survey. Most of their patients (68% of those with T1D and 63% of those with T2D) were previously treated with another mealtime insulin before switching to faster aspart. At the time of initiating faster aspart, nearly half of patients had an HbA_1c level between 7.5% (59 mmol/mol) and 8.5% (69 mmol/mol). The main prescription drivers for faster aspart, versus other mealtime insulins, were faster onset of action, improved postprandial glucose (PPG) control, and dosing flexibility. Most physicians were more satisfied with faster aspart than other mealtime insulins regarding at-meal (66%) and post-meal (71%) dosing flexibility, improved PPG levels (66%), and onset of action (61%). Main reasons for not prescribing faster aspart included a good response to current treatment (76%) or patient reluctance to switch (57%). Overall, 12% of patients discontinued faster aspart, for reasons including concerns of hypoglycemia (17%), poor adherence (17%), and level of patient co-pay (17%). More than half of physicians had fewer concerns regarding postprandial hyperglycemia, and were more confident in their patients reaching their HbA_1c target with faster aspart than with other mealtime insulins.

LIMITATIONS

The findings of this survey are based heavily on physicians' experiences, and could therefore be subject to recall bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Reported physician and patient experiences of using faster aspart have been positive, and better PPG control and increased dosing flexibility are expected to improve glycemic management.

Premix insulins in type 1 diabetes: the coming of degludec/aspart

INTRODUCTION

Although premixed fixed ratio NPH insulin products are commonly used in type 2 diabetes patients, the advent of Glargine insulin which cannot be formulated together with a rapid-acting insulin (basal-bolus) has largely eliminated premixed insulin from use in type 1 diabetes. Degludec insulin can be formulated together with Aspart insulin in a 70/30 fixed ratio product. We review the potential use of Degludec-Aspart in type 1 diabetes. Areas covered: A historical search of the development and use of premixed insulin preparations was performed relying on Pubmed, FDA, and European Union records. Expert opinion: Degludec is a once daily insulin. There appears to be little advantage to administration of Degludec-Aspart twice daily, and basal bolus injections have proved superior to premixed insulin in type 1 diabetes. There may still be a role for this premixed fixed ratio formulation in patients who have opted to use Technosphere inhaled insulin prior to and post meals. In such patients, the use of a single injection of Degludec-Aspart prior to the largest meal of the day might provide an anchor to allow patients to then self-administer multiple inhalations around mealtimes.

Brain Insulin Resistance at the Crossroads of Metabolic and Cognitive Disorders in Humans

Ever since the brain was identified as an insulin-sensitive organ, evidence has rapidly accumulated that insulin action in the brain produces multiple behavioral and metabolic effects, influencing eating behavior, peripheral metabolism, and cognition. Disturbances in brain insulin action can be observed in obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D), as well as in aging and dementia. Decreases in insulin sensitivity of central nervous pathways, i.e., brain insulin resistance, may therefore constitute a joint pathological feature of metabolic and cognitive dysfunctions. Modern neuroimaging methods have provided new means of probing brain insulin action, revealing the influence of insulin on both global and regional brain function. In this review, we highlight recent findings on brain insulin action in humans and its impact on metabolism and cognition. Furthermore, we elaborate on the most prominent factors associated with brain insulin resistance, i.e., obesity, T2D, genes, maternal metabolism, normal aging, inflammation, and dementia, and on their roles regarding causes and consequences of brain insulin resistance. We also describe the beneficial effects of enhanced brain insulin signaling on human eating behavior and cognition and discuss potential applications in the treatment of metabolic and cognitive disorders.

Cell factories for insulin production

The rapid increase in the number of diabetic patients globally and exploration of alternate insulin delivery methods such as inhalation or oral route that rely on higher doses, is bound to escalate the demand for recombinant insulin in near future. Current manufacturing technologies would be unable to meet the growing demand of affordable insulin due to limitation in production capacity and high production cost. Manufacturing of therapeutic recombinant proteins require an appropriate host organism with efficient machinery for posttranslational modifications and protein refolding. Recombinant human insulin has been produced predominantly using E. coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae for therapeutic use in human. We would focus in this review, on various approaches that can be exploited to increase the production of a biologically active insulin and its analogues in E. coli and yeast. Transgenic plants are also very attractive expression system, which can be exploited to produce insulin in large quantities for therapeutic use in human. Plant-based expression system hold tremendous potential for high-capacity production of insulin in very cost-effective manner. Very high level of expression of biologically active proinsulin in seeds or leaves with long-term stability, offers a low-cost technology for both injectable as well as oral delivery of proinsulin.

Glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus: oxidative stress and macrovascular complications

Diabetes mellitus is a world-wide health issue with potential for significant negative health outcomes, including microvascular and macrovascular complications. The relationship of hemoglobin HbA1c and other glycosylation end products (AGEs) to these complications, particularly microvascular disease, is well understood. More recent evidence suggests that glycemic variability may be associated with diabetes macrovascular complications. As HbA1c is better representative of average glucose levels and does not account as well for glycemic variability, hence new methods to assess and treat this variability is needed to reduce incidence of complications. In this chapter, the relationship of glycemic control to diabetes complications will be explored with focus on the mechanisms of tissue damage from this variability along with the oxidative stress. Additionally, treatment strategies to optimize HbA1c and glycemic variability with the goal of reducing risk of complications in persons with diabetes are reviewed.

A comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin aspart, biphasic insulin aspart 70, biphasic insulin aspart 50, and human insulin: a randomized, quadruple crossover study

BACKGROUND

We compared the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of insulin aspart, biphasic insulin aspart 70 (BIAsp70) and 50 (BIAsp50) (containing 70% and 50% rapid-acting insulin aspart, respectively), and soluble human insulin under experimental conditions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In this randomized, four-period crossover study, 19 type 1 diabetes patients received subcutaneous injections of identical doses (0.2 U/kg) of insulin aspart, BIAsp70, or BIAsp50 immediately before a standardized meal or human insulin 30 min before meal. Plasma glucose and serum insulin were measured for 12 h postprandially.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of human insulin differed from those of insulin aspart, BIAsp70, and BIAsp50. The three different aspart preparations had easily distinguishable features with regard to onset and duration of action. Insulin aspart preparations were, on average, absorbed twice as fast as human insulin. In the initial phases (0-4 h and 0-6 h), the insulin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(ins)) was significantly higher during insulin aspart treatment compared with the others, whereas insulin aspart had a significantly lower AUC(ins) over the last 6 h (P<0.05). BIAsp70 and BIAsp50 provided insulin coverage comparable to that of human insulin over the last 6 h. Insulin aspart had the most pronounced onset of action and the shortest duration. Comparing with insulin aspart and BIAsp70, BIAsp50 revealed a closer treatment ratio to human insulin on pharmacodynamic end points.

CONCLUSIONS

BIAsp70 and BIAsp50 injected immediately before a meal are at least as effective as human insulin injected 30 min earlier in controlling postprandial glycemic excursions. BIAsp50 showed the greatest similarity to human insulin with regard to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles.

Insulin X10 revisited: a super-mitogenic insulin analogue

The molecular safety of insulin analogues has received a great deal of attention over the last year. In particular, attention has been directed to the mitogenic properties of insulin analogues as compared with human insulin. Understanding the mechanisms implicated in mediating mitogenic effects of insulin is therefore of particular interest. In this review we detail the story of the rapid-acting insulin analogue known as X10, which was the first insulin analogue in clinical development, but ended up being discontinued at an early clinical development stage following findings of mammary tumours in female Sprague-Dawley rats. The molecular characteristics of insulin X10, along with its interaction at both the IGF-1 receptor and the insulin receptor, have provided us with important insights into mechanisms implicated in metabolic and mitogenic signalling of insulin analogues.

Intranasal insulin as a therapeutic option in the treatment of cognitive impairments

The brain is a major target of circulating insulin. Enhancing central nervous insulin action has been shown to improve memory functions in animals as well as in humans, benefitting in particular hippocampus-dependent (declarative) memory. As Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with reduced central nervous insulin signaling and attenuated permeation of blood-borne insulin across the blood-brain-barrier, the cognitive decline in AD patients may at least in part be derived from impaired brain insulin signaling. Thus, therapeutic strategies to overcome central nervous system insulin deficiency and resistance might be an attractive option in the treatment of cognitive impairments like AD. Insulin can be effectively delivered directly to the brain via the intranasal route that enables the hormone to bypass the blood-brain barrier and modulate central nervous functions. This review summarizes a series of studies demonstrating beneficial effects of intranasal insulin on memory functions both in healthy humans and in patients with cognitive impairments such as AD. These experiments in humans consistently indicate that enhancing brain insulin signaling by intranasal administration of the hormone improves hippocampus-dependent memory in the absence of adverse side effects. Considering that insulin also acts as a neuroprotective signal, up-regulating brain insulin levels by intranasal insulin administration appears to be a promising approach in the treatment and prevention of central nervous system insulin deficiency and resistance as found in AD.

Pharmacokinetics following continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion of insulin aspart with or without initial subcutaneous bolus

AIM

To evaluate time to steady state insulin concentration (C(ss)) following continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) of insulin aspart (IAsp) with or without an initial s.c. bolus.

METHODS

In random order 10 healthy volunteers were given a basal insulin infusion rate (0.5 U/h) for 8 h with or without an initial s.c. bolus (1.4 U). Serum IAsp was measured until 3 h after infusion was stopped.

RESULTS

An overshoot of IAsp was seen before C(ss) was achieved following an initial bolus of insulin as compared to no bolus. The apparent half-life (t((1/2))) with or without bolus did not differ (p = 0.15). Time to steady state (T(ss)) was evaluated in two ways: (1) T(ss) defined as the first point within an interval of C(ss)+/- 2 x CV was 233 vs. 166 min with and without a bolus respectively (p = 0.068). (2) A t-test was performed for each concentration-time point vs. mean C(ss), and the first point with no significance was defined, T(ss). This gave 208 (p = 0.09) and 178 min (p = 0.24) with and without bolus respectively. Mathematical modelling suggests that an ideal mean bolus should be 0.89 U, and that this bolus dose may result in a shorter T(ss).

CONCLUSION

A bolus of 1.4 U resulted in an overshoot of serum IAsp before C(ss) and a longer period before C(ss) is achieved. Mathematical modelling suggests that a mean bolus of 0.89 U would result in a faster achievement of C(ss) compared to no bolus.

Glucose variability; does it matter?

Overall lowering of glucose is of pivotal importance in the treatment of diabetes, with proven beneficial effects on microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. Still, patients with similar glycosylated hemoglobin levels and mean glucose values can have markedly different daily glucose excursions. The role of this glucose variability in pathophysiological pathways is the subject of debate. It is strongly related to oxidative stress in in vitro, animal, and human studies in an experimental setting. However, in real-life human studies including type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients, there is neither a reproducible relation with oxidative stress nor a correlation between short-term glucose variability and retinopathy, nephropathy, or neuropathy. On the other hand, there is some evidence that long-term glycemic variability might be related to microvascular complications in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Regarding mortality, a convincing relationship with short-term glucose variability has only been demonstrated in nondiabetic, critically ill patients. Also, glucose variability may have a role in the prediction of severe hypoglycemia. In this review, we first provide an overview of the various methods to measure glucose variability. Second, we review current literature regarding glucose variability and its relation to oxidative stress, long-term diabetic complications, and hypoglycemia. Finally, we make recommendations on whether and how to target glucose variability, concluding that at present we lack both the compelling evidence and the means to target glucose variability separately from all efforts to lower mean glucose while avoiding hypoglycemia.

Antibody response to insulin in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed Type 1 diabetes

AIMS

To compare levels of insulin antibodies in children and adolescents after initiation of insulin therapy using either insulin aspart (IAsp) or human insulin (HI) in combination with Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, and to investigate the relationships between insulin antibodies and HbA(1c) and insulin dose.

METHODS

IAsp-specific antibodies (IAsp-Ab) and antibodies cross-reacting with HI and IAsp (HI-cross-Ab) were analysed by radioimmunoassay at diagnosis of diabetes and every 3-6 months for 30 months. Seventy-two patients (HI = 30, IAsp = 42) with Type 1 diabetes, aged 2-17 years were included. Data on HbA(1c), insulin dose and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

IAsp-Ab levels remained low throughout the study. After 9 months, the level of HI-cross-Ab increased [mean (SD) HI, 48.8% (21.53); IAsp, 40.2% (17.92)] and remained elevated. Repeated measurement analysis of HI-cross-Ab levels showed no significant difference between treatments (P = 0.16). HI-cross-Ab were significantly associated with total insulin dose (U/kg) (P = 0.001) and time (P < 0.0001), but not with HbA(1c) (P = 0.24). Mean (+/- SD) HbA(1c) was similar at diagnosis (HI 9.5 +/- 1.97%; IAsp 9.6 +/- 1.62%); HbA(1c) then decreased and stabilized to about 6.0% in both groups. Few SAEs were reported, the majority being hypoglycaemic episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with IAsp and with HI was associated with an increase in HI-cross-Ab in insulin-naive children, but this did not influence treatment efficacy or safety. These results support the safe use of IAsp in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes.

A subcutaneous insulin pharmacokinetic model for computer simulation in a diabetes decision support role: validation and simulation

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to validate a previously derived and identified physiological subcutaneous (SC) insulin absorption model for computer simulation in a clinical diabetes decision support role using published pharmacokinetic summary measures.

METHODS

Validation was performed using maximal plasma insulin concentration (C(max)) and time to maximal concentration (t(max) pharmacokinetic summary measures. Values were either reported or estimated from 37 pharmacokinetic studies over six modeled insulin types. A validation comparison was made to equivalent pharmacokinetic summary measures calculated from model generated curves fitted to respective plasma insulin concentration data. The validation result was a measure of goodness of fit. Validation for each reported study was classified into one of four cases.

RESULTS

Of 37 model fits, 22 were validated on both the C(max) and the t(max) summary measures. Another 6 model fits were partially validated on one measure only due to lack of reporting on the second measure with errors to reported or estimated ranges of <12%. Another 7 studies could not be validated on either measure because of inadequate reported clinical data. Finally, 2 separate model fits to data from the same study failed the validation with 90 and 71% error on t(max) only, which was likely caused by protocol-based error. No model fit failed the validation on both measures.

CONCLUSIONS

A previously derived and identified model was clinically validated for six insulin types using C(max) and t(max) summary measures from published pharmacokinetic studies. Hence, this article presents a clinically valid model that accounts for multiple nonlinear effects and six different types of SC insulin in a computationally modest form suitable for use in clinical decision support.

A subcutaneous insulin pharmacokinetic model for computer simulation in a diabetes decision support role: model structure and parameter identification

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to develop a unified physiological subcutaneous (SC) insulin absorption model for computer simulation in a clinical diabetes decision support role. The model must model the plasma insulin appearance of a wide range of current insulins, especially monomer insulin and insulin glargine, utilizing common chemical states and transport rates, where appropriate.

METHODS

A compartmental model was developed with 13 patient-specific model parameters covering six diverse insulin types [rapid-acting, regular, neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH), lente, ultralente, and glargine insulin]. Model parameters were identified using 37 sets of mean plasma insulin time-course data from an extensive literature review via nonlinear optimization methods.

RESULTS

All fitted parameters have a coefficient of variation <100% (median 51.3%, 95th percentile 3.6-60.6%) and can be considered a posteriori identifiable.

CONCLUSION

A model is presented to describe SC injected insulin appearance in plasma in a diabetes decision support role. Clinically current insulin types (monomeric insulin, regular insulin, NPH, insulin, and glargine) and older insulin types (lente and ultralente) are included in a unified framework that accounts for nonlinear concentration and dose dependency. Future work requires clinical validation using published pharmacokinetic studies.

Design of an active ultrastable single-chain insulin analog: synthesis, structure, and therapeutic implications

Single-chain insulin (SCI) analogs provide insight into the inter-relation of hormone structure, function, and dynamics. Although compatible with wild-type structure, short connecting segments (<3 residues) prevent induced fit upon receptor binding and so are essentially without biological activity. Substantial but incomplete activity can be regained with increasing linker length. Here, we describe the design, structure, and function of a single-chain insulin analog (SCI-57) containing a 6-residue linker (GGGPRR). Native receptor-binding affinity (130 +/- 8% relative to the wild type) is achieved as hindrance by the linker is offset by favorable substitutions in the insulin moiety. The thermodynamic stability of SCI-57 is markedly increased (DeltaDeltaG(u) = 0.7 +/- 0.1 kcal/mol relative to the corresponding two-chain analog and 1.9 +/- 0.1 kcal/mol relative to wild-type insulin). Analysis of inter-residue nuclear Overhauser effects demonstrates that a native-like fold is maintained in solution. Surprisingly, the glycine-rich connecting segment folds against the insulin moiety: its central Pro contacts Val(A3) at the edge of the hydrophobic core, whereas the final Arg extends the A1-A8 alpha-helix. Comparison between SCI-57 and its parent two-chain analog reveals striking enhancement of multiple native-like nuclear Overhauser effects within the tethered protein. These contacts are consistent with wild-type crystal structures but are ordinarily attenuated in NMR spectra of two-chain analogs, presumably due to conformational fluctuations. Linker-specific damping of fluctuations provides evidence for the intrinsic flexibility of an insulin monomer. In addition to their biophysical interest, ultrastable SCIs may enhance the safety and efficacy of insulin replacement therapy in the developing world.

Intranasal insulin improves memory in humans: superiority of insulin aspart

There is compelling evidence that intranasal administration of regular human insulin (RH-I) improves memory in humans. Owing to the reduced tendency of its molecules to form hexamers, the rapid-acting insulin analog insulin aspart (ASP-I) is more rapidly absorbed than RH-I after subcutaneous administration. Since after intranasal insulin administration, ASP-I may also be expected to access the brain, we examined whether intranasal ASP-I has stronger beneficial effects on declarative memory than RH-I in humans. Acute (40 IU) and long-term (4 x 40 IU/day over 8 weeks) effects of intranasally administered ASP-I, RH-I, and placebo on declarative memory (word lists) were assessed in 36 healthy men in a between-subject design. Plasma insulin and glucose levels were not affected. After 8 weeks of treatment, however, word list recall was improved compared to placebo in both the ASP-I (p<0.01) and the RH-I groups (p<0.05). ASP-I-treated subjects performed even better than those of the RH-I-treated group (p<0.05). Our results indicate that insulin-induced memory improvement can be enhanced by using ASP-I. This finding may be especially relevant for a potential clinical administration of intranasal insulin in the treatment of memory disorders like Alzheimer's disease.

Intranasal insulin to improve memory function in humans

BACKGROUND

Compelling evidence indicates that central nervous insulin enhances learning and memory and in particular benefits hippocampus-dependent (i.e., declarative) memory. Intranasal administration of insulin provides an effective way of delivering the compound to the central nervous system, bypassing the blood-brain barrier and avoiding systemic side effects.

METHODS

Here we review a series of recent studies on the effects of intranasally administered insulin on memory functions in humans. In accordance with the beneficial effects of intravenously administered insulin on hippocampus-dependent declarative memory observed in hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp studies, intranasal insulin administration similarly improves this type of memory, but in the absence of adverse peripheral side effects.

RESULT AND CONCLUSION

Considering that cerebrospinal fluid insulin levels are reduced in patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease, these results may be of considerable relevance for future clinical applications of insulin in the treatment of memory disorders.

Multiple mealtime administration of biphasic insulin aspart 30 versus traditional basal-bolus human insulin treatment in patients with type 1 diabetes

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of multiple mealtime injections of biphasic insulin aspart 30 (30% fast-acting insulin aspart in the formulation, BIAsp30) to traditional basal-bolus human insulin regimen (HI) on glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients (eight women and 15 men) aged 44.8 (20.6-62.5) years (median and range) with a diabetes duration of 19.5 (1.6-44.6) years completed the study. All eligible patients were randomly assigned to BIAsp30 thrice daily supplied with bedtime NPH insulin when necessary, or basal-bolus HI for 12 weeks and then switched to the alternative regimen for another 12 weeks. The insulin dose adjustments were made by patients on the basis of advice from a diabetes nurse. At end of each treatment period, the patients attended two profile days, 1 week apart for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessments. HbA1C was measured at baseline and at the end of each treatment period. A seven-point self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) was obtained twice weekly.

RESULTS

In comparison with HI, multiple mealtime injections of BIAsp30 resulted in a significant reduction in HbA1C[HI vs. BIAsp30 (%, geometric mean and range): 8.6 (7.4-11.4) vs. 8.3 (6.7-9.8), p = 0.013]. During treatment with BIAsp30, nighttime glycaemic control was significantly improved. Day-to-day variation in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics and the rate of hypoglycaemia were not increased with BIAsp30 compared with HI.

CONCLUSIONS

In type 1 diabetics, multiple mealtime administration of BIAsp30 compared with traditional basal-bolus human insulin treatment significantly improves long-term glycaemic control without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia. Despite a higher proportion of intermediate-acting insulin, thrice-daily injections with BIAsp30 do not increase the day-to-day variations in insulin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Insulin aspart: a review

Insulin aspart, an analogue of human insulin, which is approved for use in people with diabetes, is more rapidly absorbed and achieves higher plasma concentrations than human soluble insulin following subcutaneous injection. Hence, it has a faster and more effective glucose-lowering action, with superior control of postprandial hyperglycaemia compared with human soluble insulin. Its shorter duration of action makes interprandial and nocturnal hypoglycaemia less of a problem than with human soluble insulin. Insulin aspart is approved for use in continuous subcutaneous infusion and offers a valuable treatment option during pregnancy.

Insulin kinetics in type-I diabetes: continuous and bolus delivery of rapid acting insulin

We investigated insulin lispro kinetics with bolus and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) modes of insulin delivery. Seven subjects with type-1 diabetes treated by CSII with insulin lispro have been studied during prandial and postprandial conditions over 12 hours. Eleven alternative models of insulin kinetics have been proposed implementing a number of putative characteristics. We assessed 1) the effect of insulin delivery mode, i.e., bolus or basal, on the insulin absorption rate, the effects of 2) insulin association state and 3) insulin dose on the rate of insulin absorption, 4) the remote insulin effect on its volume of distribution, 5) the effect of insulin dose on insulin disappearance, 6) the presence of insulin degradation at the injection site, and finally 7) the existence of two pathways, fast and slow, of insulin absorption. An iterative two-stage parameter estimation technique was used. Models were validated through assessing physiological feasibility of parameter estimates, posterior identifiability, and distribution of residuals. Based on the principle of parsimony, best model to fit our data combined the slow and fast absorption channels and included local insulin degradation. The model estimated that 67(53-82)% [mean (interquartile range)] of delivered insulin passed through the slow absorption channel [absorption rate 0.011(0.004-0.029) min(-1)] with the remaining 33% passed through the fast channel [absorption rate 0.021(0.011-0.040) min(-1)]. Local degradation rate was described as a saturable process with Michaelis-Menten characteristics [VMAX = 1.93(0.62 - 6.03) mU min(-1), KM = 62.6(62.6 - 62.6) mU]. Models representing the dependence of insulin absorption rate on insulin disappearance and the remote insulin effect on its volume of distribution could not be validated suggesting that these effects are not present or cannot be detected during physiological conditions.

Therapeutic insulins and their large-scale manufacture

Biotechnological innovations over the past 25 years have underpinned the rapid development of a thriving biopharmaceutical sector. Therapeutic insulin remains one of the most commonly used products of pharmaceutical biotechnology and insulin-based products command annual global sales in excess of $4.5 billion. Innovations in its method of production and in particular the advent of engineered insulin analogues provide a fascinating insight into how scientific and technological advances have impacted upon the pharmaceutical biotechnology sector as a whole. Current insulin-based diabetes research is increasingly focused not on the insulin molecule per se, but upon areas such as the development of non-parenteral insulin delivery systems, as well as organ-/cell-based and gene therapy-based approaches to controlling the disease.

Comparison of thrice daily 'high' vs. 'medium' premixed insulin aspart with respect to evening and overnight glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

The glycaemic control of thrice daily treatment with premixed biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp) without other antidiabetic therapy was tested in type 2 diabetic patients, in order to compare the glucose control of a 'high' mixture (BIAsp 70) or a 'medium' mixture (BIAsp 50) (70 or 50% soluble IAsp and 30 or 50% protamine-crystallized IAsp, respectively) administered just before dinner.

AIM

To compare these regimens to conventional 30 : 70 premixture on a twice a day basis.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study included 16 patients with type 2 diabetes. Twenty four-hour serum glucose and insulin profiles were obtained thrice: (1) after a one-week run-in period with biphasic human insulin (BHI) 30/70 twice daily (run-in), (2) after 4 weeks of treatment with thrice daily BIAsp 70 before breakfast, lunch and dinner (Dinner70 regimen) and (3) after 4 weeks of BIAsp 70 before breakfast and lunch and BIAsp 50 before dinner (Dinner50).

RESULTS

Daytime average serum glucose was lower with Dinner70 compared to run-in (9.6 +/- 0.39 mmol/l vs. 11.2 +/- 0.61 mmol/l, p < 0.05). Postprandial glucose excursions after breakfast and lunch were lower, but fasting morning glucose was higher during the treatment periods than in the run-in period. Twenty four-hour C-peptide AUC was considerably lower during both treatment periods than in the run-in period (run-in/Dinner50 ratio 1.29 [1.08; 1.54] p < 0.01; run-in/Dinner70 ratio 1.31 [1.08;1.58], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Switching the dinner dose to BIAsp 50 did not alter overall glucose control significantly from that provided with BIAsp 70. Exploratory analyses between the two active treatment regimens and run-in/BHI indicate that thrice daily BIAsp 70 administration: (1) for optimization of the night-time control, the dinner dose needs adjustment or replacement by a premixed insulin with a larger proportion of basal insulin than BIAsp 50 and (2) none of the premixtures adequately provide for both the evening meal and overnight requirements.

Pramlintide reduces postprandial glucose excursions when added to regular insulin or insulin lispro in subjects with type 1 diabetes: a dose-timing study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the postprandial glucose-lowering effect of the human amylin analog pramlintide when given with either regular insulin or insulin lispro in subjects with type 1 diabetes, with an emphasis on the optimal dose timing relative to meals.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, five-way crossover study, 19 subjects with type 1 diabetes using regular insulin and 21 subjects with type 1 diabetes using insulin lispro underwent five consecutive mixed meal tests. In randomized order, subjects received subcutaneous injections of placebo at -15 min or 60 microg pramlintide at -15, 0, +15, or +30 min relative to the meal after an overnight fast. Regular insulin or insulin lispro was injected at -30 and 0 min, respectively, at doses that were adjusted appropriately for both the content of the standardized meal and the anticipated effects of pramlintide. Plasma glucose concentrations were measured before and during the 4-h postmeal period.

RESULTS

In both the regular insulin and insulin lispro groups, pramlintide injections at all four time points lowered the postprandial glucose excursion (36 to >100% reduction in incremental area under the concentration time curve from 0 to 4 h (AUC(0-4 h)) compared with placebo. However, only preprandial injections of pramlintide (-15 and 0 min) were able to prevent the initial postprandial surge in glucose. The optimal time for pramlintide injection was 0 min, which reduced the postprandial glucose excursion by >100% compared with regular insulin plus placebo (incremental AUC(0-4 h): -0.6 +/- 2.5 vs. 11.0 +/- 2.9 mmolx h(-1) x l(-1), P < 0.0007) and by 75% compared with insulin lispro plus placebo (incremental AUC(0-4 h): 2.5 +/- 2.1 vs. 10.0 +/- 2.5 mmol x h(-1) x l(-1), P < 0.0098). No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Pramlintide, given at or just before a meal, reduces the postprandial glucose excursion in subjects with type 1 diabetes, regardless of whether added to regular insulin or a rapid-acting insulin analog.

A direct comparison of insulin aspart and insulin lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Both rapid-acting insulin analogs, insulin aspart and lispro, attenuate prandial glucose excursion compared with human soluble insulin. This trial was performed to study the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of insulin aspart and insulin lispro in type 1 diabetic patients in a direct comparison and to investigate whether the administration of one analog results in favorable effects on prandial blood glucose control.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 24 type 1 diabetic patients (age 36 +/- 8 years, 16 men and 8 women, BMI 24.3 +/- 2.6 kg/m(2), diabetes duration 17 +/- 11 years, HbA(1c) 7.9 +/- 0.8%) on intensified insulin therapy were recruited into a single-center, randomized, double-blind, two-period, cross-over, glucose clamp trial. The subjects were given an individual need-derived dose of prandial insulin lispro or aspart immediately before a standard mixed meal.

RESULTS

With respect to blood glucose excursions from time 0 to 6 h (Exc(glu(0-6 h))) and from time 0 to 4 h (Exc(glu(0-4 h))), the pharmacodynamic effect of insulin aspart and insulin lispro can be declared equivalent. This was supported by comparison with maximum postprandial blood glucose excursions (C(max(glu))) (estimated ratio aspart/lispro ANOVA [90% CI]: 0.95 [0.80-1.13], 0.97 [0.82-1.17], and 1.01 [0.95-1.07] for Exc(glu(0-6 h)), Exc(glu(0-4 h)), and C(max(glu)), respectively). For pharmacokinetic end points (maximum postprandial insulin excursions and area under the curve for insulin from time 0 to 6 h and from time 0 to 4 h), equivalence was indicated. No difference concerning absorption or elimination for time to maximal insulin concentration, time to half-maximum insulin concentration, and time to decrease to 50% of maximum insulin concentration was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that in type 1 diabetic patients, both insulin analogs are equally effective for control of postprandial blood glucose excursions.

Novel insulins: expanding options in diabetes management

Management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus with intensive insulin therapy usually includes an intermediate- or long-acting basal component for between-meal and nocturnal glycemic control, together with preprandial bolus injections of a short-acting insulin for control of meal-stimulated increases in serum glucose levels. Although the ideal basal/bolus insulin combination has yet to be found, recent developments may provide safer and more effective options. Two new short-acting semisynthetic analogs--insulin lispro and insulin aspart--can be administered as preprandial bolus injections closer to mealtime than regular human insulin, thereby synchronizing insulin administration and food absorption. In clinical trials, postprandial increases in blood glucose levels were significantly less after treatment with insulin lispro or insulin aspart than with premeal regular insulin. Because of their short duration of action, a slightly greater basal insulin supply may be needed when insulin lispro or insulin aspart is used. Inhalation devices for aerosolized regular human insulin offer another alternative to premeal subcutaneous bolus injections. Inhaled insulin is absorbed more rapidly than subcutaneous regular insulin and may therefore be given closer to mealtime. For basal therapy, insulin glargine, a new long-acting analog, is absorbed more slowly after subcutaneous administration than are conventional neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) and ultralente insulin, and has a relatively flat metabolic effect. Clinical trials indicate that insulin glargine is at least as effective as NPH insulin and ultralente insulin, and is associated with a reduced risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia. Other long-acting analogs, such as fatty acid acylated insulins, have been tested in animal models and are being evaluated in clinical studies.

Use of a novel double-antibody technique to describe the pharmacokinetics of rapid-acting insulin analogs

OBJECTIVE

To measure the contribution of bedtime intermediate-acting human insulin on the morning plasma insulin profiles after injection of the rapid-acting insulin analogs lispro and aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 14 patients with type 1 diabetes, aged 35 +/- 13 years (mean +/- SD), participated in this single-blind, randomized crossover study. After taking their usual injection of human intermediate-acting insulin the night before, they were given insulin aspart or insulin lispro (10 units) before a standardized breakfast. The contribution of continuing absorption of the human insulin was measured using a monoclonal antibody not cross-reacting with insulin aspart or lispro, whereas the contribution of the analogs was estimated by subtraction after measurement of all plasma free insulin using an antibody cross-reacting equally with human insulin and both analogs.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficient of the fasting free insulin concentrations measured with both insulin methods was 0.95. Fasting free insulin was 95 +/- 25 pmol/l before administration of insulin aspart, when determined with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detecting only human insulin, and 71 +/- 20 pmol/l before administration of insulin lispro (NS). Both insulin analogs gave marked peaks of free insulin concentrations, lispro at 40 +/- 3 min and aspart at 55 +/- 6 min after injection (P = 0.01). The later part of the profiles, from 4.5 to 5.5 h after injection, were similar and showed almost no contribution of the insulin analogs.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of insulin assays that detect human insulin only or both human insulin and analogs provides a new tool for studying insulin pharmacokinetics. Using this technique, we showed that 4.5 h after administration of the rapid-acting insulin analogs lispro and aspart, the free insulin levels are almost only attributable to the intermediate-acting insulin given at bedtime.

Immune responses to insulin aspart and biphasic insulin aspart in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

The antibody responses to a novel rapid-acting insulin analog, insulin aspart (IAsp), and their potential clinical correlates were studied with a specifically developed method in 2,420 people with diabetes treated for up to 1 year with preprandial subcutaneous injections of IAsp.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Circulating insulin antibodies were analyzed by radioimmunoassay with (125)I insulin or IAsp tracers and polyethylene glycol precipitation. Four multinational, open, parallel group studies were conducted in Europe and North America, with a total of 1,534 people with diabetes exposed to IAsp and 886 people exposed to human insulin (HI) as meal-related insulin for 6-12 months.

RESULTS

Insulin antibodies specific to HI or IAsp were absent in a majority of patients throughout the 6- to 12-month study periods. A majority of the patients (64-68%) had antibodies cross-reacting between HI and IAsp when entering the studies, with baseline levels (means +/- SD of percent bound/total) of 16.6 +/- 16.3% in study 1 and 10.3 +/- 14.0% in study 4. In all four studies, cross-reactive antibodies increased in patients exposed to IAsp, with a maximum at 3 months, and thereafter there was a decline toward baseline levels at 9-12 months (levels at 3 and 12 months: 22.3 +/- 19.7 and 16.8 +/- 16.5% in study 1 and 21.5 +/- 21.9 and 16.9 +/- 17.4% in study 4). Antibody levels showed similar changes in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and there was no consistent relationship between antibody formation and glycemic control or between antibody formation and safety in terms of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with IAsp is associated with an increase in cross-reactive insulin antibodies, with a subsequent fall toward baseline values, without any indication of clinical relevance because no effect on efficacy or safety could be identified.

Premixed insulin aspart 30 vs. premixed human insulin 30/70 twice daily: a randomized trial in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of premixed insulin aspart (30% free and 70% protamine-bound, BIAsp 30) with human insulin premix (BHI 30) used in a twice-daily injection regimen in people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

People with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes (n = 294) using twice-daily insulin were randomized to a 12-week open-label comparison of BIAsp 30 and BHI 30. Efficacy was assessed by analysis of variance of 12-week data, adjusted for baseline level.

RESULTS

BIAsp 30 was as effective as BHI 30 based on the primary efficacy measure, HbA1c, mean difference -0.01 (90% confidence interval (CI) -0.14; 0.12) %Hb. Meal-time self-measured blood glucose increment averaged over the three main meals was significantly lower in the BIAsp 30 group than in the BHI 30 group (-0.68 (-1.20; -0.16) mmol/l; P < 0.02). Significant improvements were observed after breakfast, before lunch, after dinner and at bedtime (P < 0.02-0.05), with blood glucose around 1.0 mmol/l lower in the BIAsp 30 group. The number of major hypoglycaemic episodes with BIAsp 30 was half that with BHI 30. However, the overall risk of both minor and major hypoglycaemia did not differ significantly between treatments.

CONCLUSION

Post-prandial glycaemic control was significantly improved, without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia, and overall control was similar when people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes were treated on a twice-daily regimen with immediate premeal injections of BIAsp 30 compared with BHI 30.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin aspart

Insulin aspart is a novel rapid-acting insulin analogue with improved subcutaneous absorption properties when compared with soluble human insulin. Pharmacokinetic studies show an absorption profile with a time to reach peak concentration (t(max)) about half that of human insulin, a peak plasma drug concentration (Cmax) approximately twice as high and shorter residence time. The potency and bioavailability of insulin aspart are similar to those of human insulin. The pharmacokinetics of insulin aspart have been studied in healthy Caucasian and Asian-Japanese volunteers, in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus, and in children with diabetes, with both pre- and postprandial administration and during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). The pharmacokinetic profile was similar to that of another rapid-acting insulin analogue, insulin lispro, on the basis of published information for that agent. Pharmacodynamic studies show a smaller excursion of postprandial glucose with insulin aspart injected subcutaneously just before the meal compared with soluble human insulin injected 30 minutes before the meal in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, and an equivalent control in patients with type 2 diabetes displaying residual insulin production. In a treatment study, glucose excursions evaluated from 24-hour glucose profiles showed less variability with insulin aspart compared with human insulin. Adverse events, including hypoglycaemia-induced ventricular repolarisation and hypoglycaemic threshold and awareness, did not differ between insulin aspart and human insulin. The available data suggest that subcutaneous injections of insulin aspart just before meals better mimic the endogenous insulin profile in blood compared with human insulin, resulting in improved glucose control in a meal-related insulin regimen. This review summarises the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin aspart in relation to human insulin and insulin lispro.

Efficacy, safety, and pump compatibility of insulin aspart used in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety and pump compatibility of insulin aspart (a rapid-acting insulin analog) and buffered regular human insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes undergoing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a single-center randomized open-label study Patients received CSII therapy with insulin aspart (n = 19) or buffered regular human insulin (n = 10) for 7 weeks. Bolus doses of insulin aspart were administered immediately before meals and buffered regular human insulin 30 min before meals.

RESULTS

Insulin aspart and buffered regular human insulin were both effective in controlling average daily blood glucose levels (8.2 +/- 1.9 and 8.5 +/- 2.1 mmol/l, respectively) (mean +/- SD) and maintaining serum fructosamine (343 +/- 25.7 and 336 +/- 27.4 micromol/l) and HbA1c (6.9 +/- 0.6 and 7.1 +/- 0.6%) levels. Possible obstructions and set leakages were infrequently reported in both groups. Similar numbers of patients experienced hypoglycemia (blood glucose <2.5 mmol/l): 14 (74%) insulin aspart patients versus 6 (60%) buffered regular human insulin patients. Patients receiving insulin aspart had fewer hypoglycemic events per patient (2.9) than those patients receiving buffered regular human insulin (6.2). There were no differences between the two insulins in the occurrence of hyperglycemic events (blood glucose >19 mmol/l) or in the number and type of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin aspart and buffered regular human insulin were effective and well tolerated and provided similar pump compatibility when used in CSII therapy.

Insulin aspart: a new rapid-acting insulin analog

OBJECTIVE

To examine the pharmacology, therapeutics, pharmacokinetics, dosing guidelines, adverse effects, and drug interactions of insulin aspart, and summarize the clinical trials of efficacy and safety in patients with type or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE database search (1985-May 2000) was performed to identify all applicable published articles and abstracts; in some cases, Novo Nordisk unpublished information was also obtained. Review articles on insulin analogs were also identified, as well as review chapters in medical textbooks.

STUDY SELECTION

The majority of the studies identified were in abstract form. These studies reported information on the pharmacokinetics of insulin aspart in healthy volunteers and in those with diabetes, as well as the therapeutic utility, safety, and clinical efficacy in patients with diabetes. A limited number of randomized studies were reported as artices in the medical literature

DATA EXTRACTION

All published clinical studies were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Insulin aspart, the second Food and Drug Administration-approved rapid-acting insulin analog, is produced by recombinant technology that replaces the proline at position 28 on the B chain of insulin with negatively charged aspartic acid. Insulin aspart exists as hexamers that rapidly dissociate into monomers and dimers on subcutaneous injection. When administered immediately prior to a meal, insulin aspart is at least as effective as regular human insulin in control of postprandial blood glucose concentrations. Insulin aspart achieves higher peak insulin concentrations in less time and with a shorter duration of action than regular human insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin aspart is a convenient premeal insulin for use by patients requiring mealtime insulin. Furthermore, due to favorable pharmacokinetics, insulin aspart controls postprandial blood glucose concentrations at least as well as regular human insulin and contributes to improved quality of life.

Insulin aspart vs. human insulin in the management of long-term blood glucose control in Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial

AIMS

To compare the efficacy of insulin aspart, a rapid-acting insulin analogue, with that of unmodified human insulin on long-term blood glucose control in Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Prospective, multi-centre, randomized, open-labelled, parallel-group trial lasting 6 months in 88 centres in eight European countries and including 1,070 adult subjects with Type 1 diabetes. Study patients were randomized 2:1 to insulin aspart or unmodified human insulin before main meals, with NPH-insulin as basal insulin. Main outcome measures were blood glucose control as assessed by HbA1c, eight-point self-monitored blood glucose profiles, insulin dose, quality of life, hypoglycaemia, and adverse events.

RESULTS

After 6 months, insulin aspart was superior to human insulin with respect to HbA1c with a baseline-adjusted difference in HbA1c of 0.12 (95% confidence interval 0.03-0.22) %Hb, P < 0.02. Eight-point blood glucose profiles showed lower post-prandial glucose levels (mean baseline-adjusted -0.6 to -1.2 mmol/l, P < 0.01) after all main meals, but higher pre-prandial glucose levels before breakfast and dinner (0.7-0.8 mmol/l, P < 0.01) with insulin aspart. Satisfaction with treatment was significantly better in patients treated with insulin aspart (WHO Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) baseline-adjusted difference 2.3 (1.2-3.3) points, P < 0.001). The relative risk of experiencing a major hypoglycaemic episode with insulin aspart compared to human insulin was 0.83 (0.59-1.18, NS). Major night hypoglycaemic events requiring parenteral treatment were less with insulin aspart (1.3 vs. 3.4% of patients, P < 0.05), as were late post-prandial (4-6 h) events (1.8 vs. 5.0% of patients, P < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

These results show small but useful advantage for the rapid-acting insulin analogue insulin aspart as a tool to improve long-term blood glucose control, hypoglycaemia, and quality of life, in people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Insulin Aspart

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary® Monograph Service receive five to six researched monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late Phase III trials. The monographs are targeted to your Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. Subscribers also receive monthly one-page summary monographs on the agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation (DUE) is also provided each month. The monographs are published in printed form and on diskettes that allow customization. Subscribers to the The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board called The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X). All topics pertinent to clinical pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X.

Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. If you would like information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The November 2000 Formulary monographs are lopinavir/ritonavir, cetrorelix, fluticasone propionate/salmeterol inhalation powder, atovaquone/proguanil hydrochloride, and exisulind. The DUE is onlopinavir/ritonavir.

Insulin Aspart

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary® Monograph Service receive five to six researched monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late Phase III trials. The monographs are targeted to your Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. Subscribers also receive monthly one-page summary monographs on the agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation (DUE) is also provided each month. The monographs are published in printed form and on diskettes that allow customization. Subscribers to the The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board called The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X). All topics pertinent to clinical pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X.

Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. If you would like information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The November 2000 Formulary monographs are lopinavir/ritonavir, cetrorelix, fluticasone propionate/salmeterol inhalation powder, atovaquone/proguanil hydrochloride, and exisulind. The DUE is onlopinavir/ritonavir.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin aspart, a rapid-acting analog of human insulin, in healthy Japanese volunteers

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a rapid-acting analog of human insulin, insulin aspart, were compared with those of soluble human insulin in Japanese healthy subjects. Subcutaneous single injections (0.025 and 0.05 U/kg body weight (BW)) of insulin aspart produced a significantly earlier peak of exogenous insulin level in comparison with human insulin (30.8+/-13.8 versus 61.3+/-14. 6 min, P<0.9001 for 0.025 U/kg; and 39.2+/-18.8 versus 99.2+/-53.8 min, P<0.005 for 0.05 U/kg). The peak serum level of insulin aspart was higher than that of human insulin (23.0+/-6.0 versus 9.9+/-3.1 microU/ml for 0.025 U/kg; and 30.9+/-9.2 versus 13.3+/-4.1 microU/ml for 0.05 U/kg, P<0.0001). The time to the minimal level of glucose after insulin aspart was significantly shorter compared with human insulin (P<0.05 for 0.025 U/kg BW and P<0.01 for 0.05 U/kg BW). The Delta change in blood glucose induced by insulin aspart was larger than that observed for human insulin at any dose (P<0.001). The repeated injection of insulin aspart before each meal also resulted in a rapid rise in exogenous insulin level with peak level obtained approximately 40 min after insulin aspart at any dose. When compared with results of other trials with insulin aspart, the present results showed that pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of the rapid-acting analog insulin aspart in Japanese subjects are no different from those in nonJapanese subjects.

Symptomatic and counterregulatory hormonal responses to acute hypoglycaemia induced by insulin aspart and soluble human insulin in Type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess hypoglycaemia awareness with the insulin analogue, insulin aspart. The counterregulatory hormonal and symptomatic responses to hypoglycaemia induced by insulin aspart were compared with soluble human insulin in a double-blind, randomised, two-period crossover trial in patients with Type 1 diabetes. The primary objective was to compare the blood glucose threshold for autonomic activation during hypoglycaemia induced by insulin aspart and soluble human insulin. Secondary objectives were to compare the counterregulatory, symptomatic and physiological responses to hypoglycaemia.

METHODS

20 patients were screened, 17 were randomised and 16 completed the study. Acute hypoglycaemia was induced by intravenous infusion of insulin aspart or soluble human insulin (100 U ml(-1) at a rate of 2 mU kg(-1) min(-1)).

RESULTS

No statistical difference between insulin aspart and soluble human insulin was shown for the primary blood glucose endpoint; mean arterialised blood glucose concentrations (+/-SD) at the onset of autonomic activation were 1. 88+/-0.39 mmol L(-1) for insulin aspart and 1.89+/-0.43 mmol L(-1) for soluble human insulin (not significant). No statistical differences were observed between the two insulins for the secondary endpoints: counterregulatory hormonal responses, autonomic responses, hypoglycaemia symptom scores, cognitive function and blood glucose responses. No serious adverse events were reported during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin aspart and soluble human insulin elicit the same counterregulatory and symptomatic responses to acute hypoglycaemia in patients with Type 1 diabetes.

Insulin analogs with improved pharmacokinetic profiles

The aim of insulin replacement therapy is to normalize blood glucose in order to reduce the complications of diabetes. The pharmacokinetics of the traditional insulin preparations, however, do not match the profiles of physiological insulin secretion. The introduction of the rDNA technology 20 years ago opened new ways to create insulin analogs with altered properties. Fast-acting analogs are based on the idea that an insulin with less tendency to self-association than human insulin would be more readily absorbed into the systemic circulation. Protracted-acting analogs have been created to mimic the slow, steady rate of insulin secretion in the fasting state. The present paper provides a historical review of the efforts to change the physicochemical and pharmacological properties of insulin in order to improve insulin therapy. The available clinical studies of the new insulins are surveyed and show, together with modeling results, that new strategies for optimal basal-bolus treatment are required for utilization of the new fast-acting analogs.

A sedimentation equilibrium study of platypus insulin: the HB10D mutant does not associate beyond dimer

An extensive study of the self-association patterns of zinc-free synthetic native and mutant (HB10D) platypus insulin in solution (pH = 7.0; I = 0.1 M; 25 degrees C) has been undertaken using the method of sedimentation equilibrium. The data was fitted to a mathematical equation describing the indefinite duoisodesmic (IDI) model of self-association [A.E. Mark, P.D. Jeffrey, Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Slayer, 371 (1990) 1165]. From this the relevant association constants, KA and KB, describing the polymerising system were calculated. This information allows the calculation of the complex distribution of odd and even numbered polymeric species within the insulin system in solution. In the studies on the self-association of the synthetic native and mutant platypus insulin, each was compared with bovine insulin as well as with each other. It is concluded that there is some reduction in the extent of the self-association of native platypus insulin compared to bovine insulin. A reduction, in specifically the dimer-dimer interaction, is indicated by the higher KA and lower KB values. HB10D platypus insulin shows a dramatic reduction in self-association compared to native platypus and to bovine insulin. Analysis of the self-association pattern yielding a KB value of effectively zero suggests that the substitution of an aspartic acid residue for a histidine at B10 virtually abolishes its dimer-dimer interaction. Platypus insulin has essentially the same biological activity as that of porcine (submitted for publication) but a somewhat lower self-association, while the introduction of one amino acid in a critical region increases the activity twofold while abolishing self-association beyond dimer.