Energy metabolism in diabetic and nondiabetic heart transplant recipients

Insulin-mimetic effects of short-term rapamycin in type 1 diabetic patients prior to islet transplantation

BACKGROUND

The immunosuppressive drug rapamycin may influence insulin sensitivity in insulin-responsive tissues.

AIMS

This study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of rapamycin pre-treatment before pancreatic islet allotransplantation (ITx) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).

METHODS

Forty-one T1DM patients were studied. Thirteen patients with poor glycemic control underwent a short-term rapamycin treatment before ITx (Group 1), and they were compared to 28 patients undergoing ITx without rapamycin pre-treatment (Group 2). Outcomes were daily insulin requirement (DIR), fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, C-peptide and the SUITO index of beta-cell function. A subgroup of patients pre-treated with rapamycin before ITx underwent euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp with [6,6-²H₂] glucose before and after ITx to evaluate insulin sensitivity.

RESULTS

We found a significant reduction in DIR after rapamycin pre-treatment (- 8 ± 6 U/day, mean ± SD, p < 0.001) and 1 year after ITx. DIR reduction 1 year after ITx was greater in Group 1 as compared to Group 2 (- 37 ± 15 vs. - 19 ± 13 U/day, p = 0.005) and remained significant after adjusting for gender, age, glucose and baseline HbA1c (beta = 18.2 ± 5.9, p = 0.006). Fasting glucose and HbA1c significantly decreased 1 year after ITx in Group 1 (HbA1c: - 2.1 ± 1.4%, p = 0.002), while fasting C-peptide (+0.5 ± 0.3 nmol/l, p = 0.002) and SUITO index increased (+57.4 ± 39.7, p = 0.016), without differences between the two groups. Hepatic glucose production decreased after rapamycin pre-treatment (- 1.1 ± 1.1 mg/kg/min, p = 0.04) and after ITx (- 1.6 ± 0.6 mg/kg/min, p = 0.015), while no changes in peripheral glucose disposal were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapamycin pre-treatment before ITx succeeds in reducing insulin requirement, enhancing hepatic insulin sensitivity. This treatment may improve short-term ITx outcomes, possibly in selected patients with T1DM complicated by insulin resistance.

CLINICAL TRIAL

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01060605; NCT00014911.

Atrial Natriuretic Peptide in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients With and Without Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Natriuretic peptides are useful markers for risk stratification of patients with heart disease. However, conflicting results have been reported about circulating atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentration in heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

To ascertain the effects of diabetes and acute insulin administration on plasma ANP concentrations in a model of heart denervation, we studied 12 diabetic (D-OHT) and 6 nondiabetic heart-transplanted (OHT) patients using the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp and oral glucose tolerance tests. Five patients with type 2 diabetes without heart transplantation (D) and 9 healthy subjects (NOR) matched for anthropometric features served as the controls.

RESULTS

Means baseline plasma ANP concentration was higher in D-OHT (82 +/- 15 pg/mL) than in OHT or NOR (27 +/- 4 or 30 +/- 5; P < .01), but was not different than D (69 +/- 12; P = .82). During the clamp plasma ANP showed similar increases in all groups (49 +/- 4, 39 +/- 3, 59 +/- 4, and 49 +/- 3% in D-OHT, OHT, D, and NOR; P < .02 vs basal, P = NS among groups). Plasma osmolarity and catecholamines were also not different among groups and did not increase during the clamp. Fasting plasma ANP concentrations correlated with plasma glucose concentrations measured 120 minutes after oral glucose tolerance testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Among heart transplantation recipients fasting plasma ANP concentrations were not different at 5 to 6 years after the surgical procedure than in nondiabetic controls. Increased ANP concentrations were observed among recipients with diabetes and among nontransplanted diabetic patients. Although the insulin-induced increment in ANP concentrations was not different among groups, circulating ANP was strongly associated with glucose tolerance status.

Postabsorptive and insulin-stimulated energy homeostasis and leucine turnover in offspring of type 2 diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to ascertain whether insulin resistance with respect to protein metabolism is an additional primary metabolic abnormality affecting insulin-resistant offspring of type 2 diabetic parents, along with insulin resistance with respect to glucose and lipid metabolism.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We studied 18 young, nonobese offspring of type 2 diabetic parents and 27 healthy matched (by means of dual-energy X-ray absorption) individuals with the bolus plus continuous infusion of [6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose and [1-(13)C]leucine in combination with the insulin clamp (40 mU x m(-2) x min(-1)).

RESULTS

Fasting plasma leucine, phenylalanine, alanine, and glutamine concentrations, as well as the glucose and leucine turnover (reciprocal pool model: 155 +/- 10 vs. 165 +/- 5 micromol x kg lean body mass(-1) x h(-1) in offspring of type 2 diabetic patients and healthy matched individuals, respectively), were also not different. During the clamp, glucose turnover rates were significantly reduced in offspring of type 2 diabetic patients (7.1 +/- 0.5) in comparison with healthy matched individuals (9.9 +/- 0.6 mg x kg lean body mass(-1) x min(-1); P < 0.01). Also, the suppression of leucine turnover was impaired in offspring of type 2 diabetic patients (12 +/- 1%) in comparison with healthy matched individuals (17 +/- 1%; P = 0.04) and correlated with the degree of the impairment of insulin-stimulated glucose metabolism (R(2) = 0.13; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonobese, nondiabetic, insulin-resistant offspring of type 2 diabetic patients were characterized by an impairment of insulin-dependent suppression of protein breakdown, which was proportional to the impairment of glucose metabolism. These results demonstrate that in humans, a primary in vivo impairment of insulin action affects glucose and fatty acid metabolism as previously shown and also protein/amino acid metabolism.

Metabolic effects of a corticosteroid-free immunosuppressive regimen in recipients of pancreatic transplant

BACKGROUND

A corticosteroid (CS)-free immunosuppressive regimen may be considered less diabetogenic than treatments including CSs principally after pancreas transplantation.

METHODS

To test whether a CS-free immunosuppressive treatment is metabolically superior to a regimen including CSs, we prospectively studied 19 CS-free simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant recipients (body mass index=22+/-1 kg/m2; cyclosporine dose=400+/-19 mg/kg/day; azathioprine dose=77+/-8 mg/day; basal plasma C-peptide=1.3+/-0.12 ng/mL) and 12 matched CS-treated SPK transplant recipients (prednisone dose=9+/-1 mg/day; basal C-peptide=2.2+/-0.2 ng/mL) by means of the 6,6-2H(2)-glucose infusion and the euglycemic insulin clamp (1 mU/kg/min, insulin infusion rate). In addition, six renal transplant recipients receiving a CS-free regimen were also studied as a control group.

RESULTS

In the postabsorptive state, CS-treated SPK transplant recipients demonstrated comparable plasma glucose levels but higher plasma insulin levels than CS-free SPK transplant recipients. Plasma triglyceride levels were significantly higher in CS-treated SPK patients than in CS-free SPK patients (1.16+/-0.16 mg/dL vs. 0.88+/-0.08; P<0.05). High-density lipoprotein and apoprotein A(1) levels were similar in both groups. No difference was observed in pyruvate, lactate, beta-OH-butyrate, and basal endogenous glucose production in all three groups of patients studied. During euglycemic hyperinsulinemia, the inhibition of endogenous glucose production and the stimulation of tissue glucose disposal were not statistically different among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SPK recipients receiving chronic low-dose CS maintenance therapy do not present a lower glucose disposal than CS-free recipients. Nonetheless, this is obtained at the expense of a higher endogenous insulin secretion, which can cause an alteration of the triglyceride profile.