Gliomas: survival differences between metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties

Comparative analysis of patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and adverse events after lumbar spinal fusion between urban and rural hospitals: an analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database

OBJECTIVE

Rural location of a patient's primary residence has been associated with worse clinical and surgical outcomes due to limited resource availability in these parts of the US. However, there is a paucity of literature investigating the effect that a rural hospital location may have on these outcomes specific to lumbar spine fusions.

METHODS

Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we identified all patients who underwent primary lumbar spinal fusion in the years between 2009 and 2020. Patients were separated according to whether the operative hospital was considered rural or urban. Univariable and multivariable regression models were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Of 2,863,816 patients identified, 120,298 (4.2 %) had their operation at a rural hospital, with the remaining in an urban hospital. Patients in the urban cohort were younger (P < .001), more likely to have private insurance (39.81 % vs 31.95 %, P < .001), and fewer of them were in the first (22.52 % vs 43.00 %, P < .001) and second (25.96 % vs 38.90 %, P < .001) quartiles of median household income compared to the rural cohort. The urban cohort had significantly increased rates of respiratory (4.49 % vs 3.37 %), urinary (5.25 % vs 4.15 %), infectious (0.49 % vs 0.32 %), venous thrombotic (0.57 % vs 0.24 %, P < .001), and neurological (0.79 % vs 0.36 %) (all P < .001) perioperative complications. On multivariable analysis, the urban cohort had significantly increased odds of the same perioperative complications: respiratory (odds ratio[OR] = 1.48; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.74), urinary (OR = 1.34; 95 %CI, 1.20-1.50), infection (OR = 1.63; 95 %CI, 1.23-2.17), venous thrombotic (OR = 1.79; 95 %CI, 1.32-2.41), neurological injury (OR = 1.92; 95 %CI, 1.46-2.53), and localized infection (OR = 1.65; 95 %CI, 1.25-2.17) (all P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing lumbar fusions experience significantly different outcomes based on the rural or urban location of the operative hospital.

The relationship between social determinants of health and neurocognitive and mood-related symptoms in the primary brain tumor population: A systematic review

Social determinants of health (SDOH) impact cancer-related health outcomes, including survival, but their impact on symptoms is less understood among the primary brain tumor (PBT) population. We conducted a systematic review to examine the relationships between SDOH and neurocognitive and mood-related symptoms among the PBT population. PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched using PROGRESS criteria (place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socioeconomic status, and social capital) on March 8th, 2022. Two individuals screened and assessed study quality using the NHLBI Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies. Of 3006 abstracts identified, 150 full-text articles were assessed, and 48 were included for a total sample of 28 454 study participants. Twenty-two studies examined 1 SDOH; none examined all 8. Four studies measured place of residence, 2 race/ethnicity, 13 occupation, 42 gender, 1 religion, 18 education, 4 socioeconomic status, and 15 social capital. Fifteen studies assessed neurocognitive and 37 mood-related symptoms. While higher education was associated with less neurocognitive symptoms, and among individuals with meningioma sustained unemployment after surgery was associated with depressive symptoms, results were otherwise disparate among SDOH and symptoms. Most studies were descriptive or exploratory, lacking comprehensive inclusion of SDOH. Standardizing SDOH collection, reducing bias, and recruiting diverse samples are recommended in future interventions.

A Nomogram to Predict Recurrence-Free Survival Following Surgery for Vestibular Schwannoma

Background

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common benign tumor of the posterior fossa. The recurrence of VS has always received widespread attention. This study aimed to develop a nomogram to predict Recurrence-free survival (RFS) following resection of VS.

Methods

A total of 425 patients with VS who underwent resection at the Department of Neurosurgery in Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 2014 and December 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The medical records and follow-up data were collected. Cox regression analysis was used to screen prognostic factors and construct the nomogram. The predictive accuracy and clinical benefits of the nomogram were validated using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The Cox regression analysis revealed that age (HR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.94 - 0.99; p < 0.01), EOR (HR = 4.65; 95% CI 2.22 - 9.74; p < 0.001), and Ki-67 (HR = 1.16; 95% CI 1.09 - 1.23; p < 0.001) were all significantly correlated with recurrence, and they were finally included in the nomogram model. The concordance index of the nomogram was 0.86. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of the nomogram model of 3-, 4- and 5-year were 0.912, 0.865, and 0.809, respectively. A well-fitted calibration curve was also generated for the nomogram model. The DCA curves also indicated that the nomogram model had satisfactory clinical utility compared to the single indicators.

Conclusions

We developed a nomogram that has high accuracy in predicting RFS in patients after resection of VS. All of the included prognostic factors are easy to obtain. The nomogram can improve the postoperative management of patients and assist clinicians in individualized clinical treatment. Furthermore, we generated a web-based calculator to facilitate clinical application: https://abc123-123.shinyapps.io/VS-RFS/.

The Ethical Dilemma in the Surgical Management of Low Grade Gliomas According to the Variable Availability of Resources and Surgeon Experience

Low grade gliomas (LGGs) affect young individuals in the prime of life. Management may alternatively include biopsy and observation or surgical resection. Recent evidence strongly favors maximal and supramaximal resection of LGGs in optimizing survival metrics. Awake craniotomy with cortical mapping and electrical stimulation along with other preoperative and intraoperative surgical adjuncts, including intraoperative magnetic resonance and diffusion tensor imaging, facilitates maximization of resection and eschews precipitating neurological deficits. Intraoperative imaging permits additional resection of identified residual to be completed within the same surgical session, improving extent of resection and consequently progression free and overall survival. These resources are available in only a few centers throughout the United States, raising an ethical dilemma as to where patients harboring LGGs should most appropriately be treated.