1
|
Pavan A, Fasano A, Lattanzi S, Cortellini L, Cipollini V, Insalaco S, Mauro MC, Germanotta M, Aprile IG. Effectiveness of Two Models of Telerehabilitation in Improving Recovery from Subacute Upper Limb Disability after Stroke: Robotic vs. Non-Robotic. Brain Sci 2024; 14:941. [PMID: 39335435 PMCID: PMC11430637 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14090941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2024] [Revised: 09/13/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Finding innovative digital solutions is fundamental to ensure prompt and continuous care for patients with chronic neurological disorders, whose demand for rehabilitation also in home-based settings is steadily increasing. The aim is to verify the safety and the effectiveness of two telerehabilitation (TR) models in improving recovery from subacute upper limb (UL) disability after stroke, with and without a robotic device. METHODS One hundred nineteen subjects with subacute post-stroke UL disability were assessed for eligibility. Of them, 30 patients were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to either the Robotic Group (RG), undergoing a 20-session TR program, using a robotic device, or the Non-Robotic Group (NRG), undergoing a 20-session TR program without robotics. Clinical evaluations were measured at baseline (T0) and post-intervention (T1, 5 weeks after baseline), and included assessments of quality of life, motor skills, and clinical/functional status. The primary outcome measure was the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0, evaluating the change in perceived disability. RESULTS Statistical analysis shows that patients of both groups improved significantly over time in all domains analyzed (mean decrease from baseline in the WHODAS 2.0 of 6.09 ± 2.62% for the NRG, and of 0.76 ± 2.21% for the RG), with a greater improvement of patients in the NRG in motor (Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity-motor function, Box and Block Test) and cognitive skills (Trail Making Test-A). CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the potential of TR programs to transform stroke rehabilitation by enhancing accessibility and patient-centered care, promoting autonomy, improving adherence, and leading to better outcomes and quality of life for stroke survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessio Fasano
- Neuromotor Rehabilitation Department, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, 50143 Florence, Italy; (A.P.); (S.L.); (L.C.); (V.C.); (S.I.); (M.C.M.); (M.G.); (I.G.A.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martino Cinnera A, Palomba A, Paci M, Marino D, LA Rosa G, Gimigliano F, Straudi S, Morone G. A three-year update on guidelines for upper limb robotic rehabilitation after stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2024; 60:556-558. [PMID: 38860695 PMCID: PMC11391390 DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.24.08451-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angela Palomba
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy -
| | - Matteo Paci
- Department of Allied Health Professions, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Dario Marino
- Italian Association of Occupational Therapists (AITO), Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Gimigliano
- Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Sofia Straudi
- Department of Neuroscience, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Giovanni Morone
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
- San Raffaele Institute of Sulmona, Sulmona, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Capecci M, Gandolfi M, Straudi S, Calabrò RS, Baldini N, Pepa L, Andrenelli E, Smania N, Ceravolo MG, Morone G, Bonaiuti D. Shaping the future: an Italian survey unveils the unmet need to empower physical medicine and rehabilitation professionals with technological skills. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2024; 60:540-543. [PMID: 38618695 PMCID: PMC11255873 DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.24.08376-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Capecci
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurorehabilitation Clinic, University Hospital of Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Marialuisa Gandolfi
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, AOUI Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Sofia Straudi
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Ferrara University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
| | | | - Nicolò Baldini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurorehabilitation Clinic, University Hospital of Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Lucia Pepa
- Department of Information Engineering, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Elisa Andrenelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurorehabilitation Clinic, University Hospital of Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Nicola Smania
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, AOUI Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria G Ceravolo
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurorehabilitation Clinic, University Hospital of Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Morone
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'aquila, L'Aquila, Italy -
- San Raffaele Institute, Sulmona, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lassi M, Dalise S, Bandini A, Spina V, Azzollini V, Vissani M, Micera S, Mazzoni A, Chisari C. Neurophysiological underpinnings of an intensive protocol for upper limb motor recovery in subacute and chronic stroke patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2024; 60:13-26. [PMID: 37987741 DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.23.07922-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upper limb (UL) motor impairment following stroke is a leading cause of functional limitations in activities of daily living. Robot-assisted therapy supports rehabilitation, but how its efficacy and the underlying neural mechanisms depend on the time after stroke is yet to be assessed. AIM We investigated the response to an intensive protocol of robot-assisted rehabilitation in sub-acute and chronic stroke patients, by analyzing the underlying changes in clinical scores, electroencephalography (EEG) and end-effector kinematics. We aimed at identifying neural correlates of the participants' upper limb motor function recovery, following an intensive 2-week rehabilitation protocol. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Inpatients and outpatients from the Neurorehabilitation Unit of Pisa University Hospital, Italy. POPULATION Sub-acute and chronic stroke survivors. METHODS Thirty-one stroke survivors (14 sub-acute, 17 chronic) with mild-to-moderate UL paresis were enrolled. All participants underwent ten rehabilitative sessions of task-oriented exercises with a planar end-effector robotic device. All patients were evaluated with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale and the Wolf Motor Function Test, at recruitment (T0), end-of-treatment (T1), and one-month follow-up (T2). Along with clinical scales, kinematic parameters and quantitative EEG were collected for each patient. Kinematics metrics were related to velocity, acceleration and smoothness of the movement. Relative power in four frequency bands was extracted from the EEG signals. The evolution over time of kinematic and EEG features was analyzed, in correlation with motor recovery. RESULTS Both groups displayed significant gains in motility after treatment. Sub-acute patients displayed more pronounced clinical improvements, significant changes in kinematic parameters, and a larger increase in Beta-band in the motor area of the affected hemisphere. In both groups these improvements were associated to a decrease in the Delta-band of both hemispheres. Improvements were retained at T2. CONCLUSIONS The intensive two-week rehabilitation protocol was effective in both chronic and sub-acute patients, and improvements in the two groups shared similar dynamics. However, stronger cortical and behavioral changes were observed in sub-acute patients suggesting different reorganizational patterns. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT This study paves the way to personalized approaches to UL motor rehabilitation after stroke, as highlighted by different neurophysiological modifications following recovery in subacute and chronic stroke patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Lassi
- The Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefania Dalise
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Andrea Bandini
- The Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
- Health Science Interdisciplinary Research Center, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Spina
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Vissani
- The Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Silvestro Micera
- The Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
- Bertarelli Foundation Chair in Translational Neural Engineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics and Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fèdèrale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Mazzoni
- The Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Carmelo Chisari
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy -
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hsu HY, Koh CL, Yang KC, Lin YC, Hsu CH, Su FC, Kuo LC. Effects of an assist-as-needed equipped Tenodesis-Induced-Grip Exoskeleton Robot (TIGER) on upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2024; 21:5. [PMID: 38173006 PMCID: PMC10765635 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01298-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The original version of the Tenodesis-Induced-Grip Exoskeleton Robot (TIGER) significantly improved the motor and functional performance of the affected upper extremity of chronic stroke patients. The assist-as-needed (AAN) technique in robot-involved therapy is widely favored for promoting patient active involvement, thereby fostering motor recovery. However, the TIGER lacked an AAN control strategy, which limited its use in different clinical applications. The present study aimed to develop and analyze the training effects of an AAN control mode to be integrated into the TIGER, to analyze the impact of baseline patient characteristics and training paradigms on outcomes for individuals with chronic stroke and to compare training effects on the upper limb function between using the AAN-equipped TIGER and using the original prototype. METHODS This was a single-arm prospective interventional study which was conducted at a university hospital. In addition to 20 min of regular task-specific motor training, each participant completed a 20-min robotic training program consisting of 10 min in the AAN control mode and 10 min in the functional mode. The training sessions took place twice a week for 9 weeks. The primary outcome was the change score of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), and the secondary outcomes were the change score of the Box and Blocks Test (BBT), the amount of use (AOU) and quality of movement (QOM) scales of the Motor Activity Log (MAL), the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament (SWM) test, and the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) for fingers and wrist joints. The Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) and stepwise regression model were used as the statistical analysis methods. RESULTS Sixteen chronic stroke patients completed all steps of the study. The time from stroke onset to entry into the trial was 21.7 ± 18.9 months. After completing the training with the AAN-equipped TIGER, they exhibited significant improvements in movement reflected in their total score (pre/post values were 34.6 ± 11.5/38.5 ± 13.4) and all their sub-scores (pre/post values were 21.5 ± 6.0/23.3 ± 6.5, 9.5 ± 6.2/11.3 ± 7.2, and 3.6 ± 1.0/3.9 ± 1.0 for the shoulder, elbow, and forearm sub-category, the wrist and hand sub-category, and the coordination sub-category, respectively) on the FMA-UE (GEE, p < 0.05), as well as their scores on the BBT (pre/post values were 5.9 ± 6.5/9.5 ± 10.1; GEE, p = 0.004) and the AOU (pre/post values were 0.35 ± 0.50/0.48 ± 0.65; GEE, p = 0.02). However, the original TIGER exhibited greater improvements in their performance on the FMA-UE than the participants training with the AAN-equipped TIGER (GEE, p = 0.008). The baseline score for the wrist and hand sub-category of the FMA-UE was clearly the best predictor of TIGER-mediated improvements in hand function during the post-treatment assessment (adjusted R2 = 0.282, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study developed an AAN-equipped TIGER system and demonstrated its potential effects on improving both the function and activity level of the affected upper extremity of patients with stroke. Nevertheless, its training effects were not found to be advantageous to the original prototype. The baseline score for the FMA-UE sub-category of wrist and hand was the best predictor of improvements in hand function after TIGER rehabilitation. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03713476; date of registration: October19, 2018. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03713476.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiu-Yun Hsu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.1, University Road, Tainan, 701, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Lin Koh
- Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.1, University Road, Tainan, 701, Taiwan
| | - Kang-Chin Yang
- Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Ching Lin
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chieh-Hsiang Hsu
- Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.1, University Road, Tainan, 701, Taiwan
- Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Fong-Chin Su
- Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Li-Chieh Kuo
- Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.1, University Road, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
- Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pavan A, Fasano A, Cortellini L, Lattanzi S, Papadopoulou D, Insalaco S, Germanotta M, Aprile I. Implementation of a robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation protocol for a customized treatment after stroke: A retrospective analysis. NeuroRehabilitation 2024; 54:411-420. [PMID: 38457161 DOI: 10.3233/nre-230367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many authors have emphasized the need for individualized treatments in rehabilitation, but no tailored robotic rehabilitation protocol for stroke patients has been established yet. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of a robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation protocol based on clinical assessment for customized treatment of stroke patients. METHODS Clinical data from 81 patients with subacute stroke, undergoing an upper limb robot-mediated rehabilitation, were analyzed retrospectively. 49 patients were treated using a customized robotic protocol (experimental group, EG) based on a clinically guided flowchart, while 32 were treated without it (control group, CG). Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Motricity Index (MI), modified Barthel Index (mBI) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measured before (T0) and after (T1) rehabilitation intervention were used as clinical outcomes. RESULTS There was statistically significant improvement in both groups in terms of FMA-UE, MI, and mBI, while no change in NRS. Intergroup analysis showed significantly greater improvement of the FMA-UE (P = 0.002) and MI (P < 0.001) in the EG, compared with the CG. CONCLUSION The implementation of our robotic protocol for customized treatment of stroke patients yielded greater recovery in upper limb motor function and strength over robotic treatment without a defined protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianna Pavan
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessio Fasano
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Irene Aprile
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cinnera AM, Bonnì S, D'Acunto A, Maiella M, Ferraresi M, Casula EP, Pezzopane V, Tramontano M, Iosa M, Paolucci S, Morone G, Vannozzi G, Koch G. Cortico-cortical stimulation and robot-assisted therapy (CCS and RAT) for upper limb recovery after stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:823. [PMID: 38129910 PMCID: PMC10740274 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07849-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since birth, during the exploration of the environment to interact with objects, we exploit both the motor and sensory components of the upper limb (UL). This ability to integrate sensory and motor information is often compromised following a stroke. However, to date, rehabilitation protocols are focused primarily on recovery of motor function through physical therapies. Therefore, we have planned a clinical trial to investigate the effect on functionality of UL after a sensorimotor transcranial stimulation (real vs sham) in add-on to robot-assisted therapy in the stroke population. METHODS A randomised double-blind controlled trial design involving 32 patients with a single chronic stroke (onset > 180 days) was planned. Each patient will undergo 15 consecutive sessions (5 days for 3 weeks) of paired associative stimulation (PAS) coupled with UL robot-assisted therapy. PAS stimulation will be administered using a bifocal transcranial magnetic stimulator (TMS) on the posterior-parietal cortex and the primary motor area (real or sham) of the lesioned hemisphere. Clinical, kinematics and neurophysiological changes will be evaluated at the end of protocol and at 1-month follow-up and compared with baseline. The Fugl-Meyer assessment scale will be the primary outcome. Secondly, kinematic variables will be recorded during the box-and-block test and reaching tasks using video analysis and inertial sensors. Single pulse TMS and electroencephalography will be used to investigate the changes in local cortical reactivity and in the interconnected areas. DISCUSSION The presented trial shall evaluate with a multimodal approach the effects of sensorimotor network stimulation applied before a robot-assisted therapy training on functional recovery of the upper extremity after stroke. The combination of neuromodulation and robot-assisted therapy can promote an increase of cortical plasticity of sensorimotor areas followed by a clinical benefit in the motor function of the upper limb. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05478434. Registered on 28 Jul 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Martino Cinnera
- Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
| | - Sonia Bonnì
- Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia D'Acunto
- Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Maiella
- Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferraresi
- Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Elias Paolo Casula
- Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
- Department of System Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Pezzopane
- Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Tramontano
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Iosa
- Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
- Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Paolucci
- Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Morone
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vannozzi
- Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Koch
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim SH, Ji DM, Hwang IS, Ryu J, Jin S, Kim SA, Kim MS. Three-Dimensional Magnetic Rehabilitation, Robot-Enhanced Hand-Motor Recovery after Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1685. [PMID: 38137133 PMCID: PMC10742112 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13121685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
We developed an end-effector-type rehabilitation robot that can uses electro- and permanent magnets to generate a three-way magnetic field to assist hand movements and perform rehabilitation therapy. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of a rehabilitation program using a three-dimensional (3D) magnetic force-based hand rehabilitation robot on the motor function recovery of the paralyzed hands of patients with stroke. This was a double-blind randomized controlled trial in which 36 patients with subacute stroke were assigned to intervention and control groups of 18 patients each. The intervention group received 30 min of rehabilitation therapy per day for a month using a 3D magnetic force-driven hand rehabilitation robot, whereas the control group received 30 min of conventional occupational therapy to restore upper-limb function. The patients underwent three behavioral assessments at three time points: before starting treatment (T0), after 1 month of treatment (T1), and at the follow-up 1-month after treatment completion (T2). The primary outcome measure was the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and secondary outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Limb (FMA_U), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and European Quality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire. No participant safety issues were reported during the intervention. Analysis using repeated measures analysis of variance showed significant interaction effects between time and group for both the WMFT score (p = 0.012) and time (p = 0.010). In post hoc analysis, the WMFT scores and time improved significantly more in the patients who received robotic rehabilitation at T1 than in the controls (p = 0.018 and p = 0.012). At T2, we also consistently found improvements in both the WMFT scores and times for the intervention group that were superior to those in the control group (p = 0.024 and p = 0.018, respectively). Similar results were observed for FMA_U, MBI, and EQ-5D. Rehabilitation using the 3D hand-rehabilitation robot effectively restored hand function in the patients with subacute stroke, contributing to improvement in daily independence and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung-Hoon Kim
- Department of Electronics & Information Engineering, Korea University, Sejong 30019, Republic of Korea;
| | - Dong-Min Ji
- Department of Electronics Convergence Engineering, Wonkwang University, Iksan 54538, Republic of Korea;
| | - In-Su Hwang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea; (I.-S.H.); (J.R.); (S.J.); (S.-A.K.)
| | - Jinwhan Ryu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea; (I.-S.H.); (J.R.); (S.J.); (S.-A.K.)
| | - Sol Jin
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea; (I.-S.H.); (J.R.); (S.J.); (S.-A.K.)
| | - Soo-A Kim
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea; (I.-S.H.); (J.R.); (S.J.); (S.-A.K.)
| | - Min-Su Kim
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea; (I.-S.H.); (J.R.); (S.J.); (S.-A.K.)
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Broderick M, O'Shea R, Burridge J, Demain S, Johnson L, Bentley P. Examining Usability, Acceptability, and Adoption of a Self-Directed, Technology-Based Intervention for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke: Cohort Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2023; 10:e45993. [PMID: 37603405 PMCID: PMC10477927 DOI: 10.2196/45993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upper limb (UL) recovery after stroke is strongly dependent upon rehabilitation dose. Rehabilitation technologies present pragmatic solutions to dose enhancement, complementing therapeutic activity within conventional rehabilitation, connecting clinicians with patients remotely, and empowering patients to drive their own recovery. To date, rehabilitation technologies have been poorly adopted. Understanding the barriers to adoption may shape strategies to enhance technology use and therefore increase rehabilitation dose, thus optimizing recovery potential. OBJECTIVE We examined the usability, acceptability, and adoption of a self-directed, exercise-gaming technology within a heterogeneous stroke survivor cohort and investigated how stroke survivor characteristics, technology usability, and attitudes toward technology influenced adoption. METHODS A feasibility study of a novel exercise-gaming technology for self-directed UL rehabilitation in early subacute stroke survivors (N=30) was conducted in an inpatient, acute hospital setting. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded; participants' performance in using the system (usability) was assessed using a 4-point performance rating scale (adapted from the Barthel index), and adherence with the system was electronically logged throughout the trial. The technology acceptance model was used to formulate a survey examining the acceptability of the system. Spearman rank correlations were used to examine associations between participant characteristics, user performance (usability), end-point technology acceptance, and intervention adherence (adoption). RESULTS The technology was usable for 87% (n=26) of participants, and the overall technology acceptance rating was 68% (95% CI 56%-79%). Participants trained with the device for a median of 26 (IQR 16-31) minutes daily over an enrollment period of 8 (IQR 5-14) days. Technology adoption positively correlated with user performance (usability) (ρ=0.55; 95% CI 0.23-0.75; P=.007) and acceptability as well as domains of perceived usefulness (ρ=0.42; 95% CI 0.09-0.68; P=.03) and perceived ease of use (ρ=0.46; 95% CI 0.10-0.74; P=.02). Technology acceptance decreased with increased global stroke severity (ρ=-0.56; 95% CI -0.79 to -0.22; P=.007). CONCLUSIONS This technology was usable and acceptable for the majority of the cohort, who achieved an intervention dose with technology-facilitated, self-directed UL training that exceeded conventional care norms. Technology usability and acceptability were determinants of adoption and appear to be mediated by stroke severity. The results demonstrate the importance of selecting technologies for stroke survivors on the basis of individual needs and abilities, as well as optimizing the accessibility of technologies for the target user group. Facilitating changes in stroke survivors' beliefs and attitudes toward rehabilitation technologies may enhance adoption. Further work is needed to understand how technology can be optimized to benefit those with more severe stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Broderick
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert O'Shea
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Burridge
- School of Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Demain
- School of Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Johnson
- School of Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Bentley
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aprile I, Bramante L, La Russa C, Germanotta M, Barletta VT, Falchini F, Brambilla L, Guglielmelli E, Rossi P. A Multiaxial Rehabilitation Programme for Workers with COVID-19 Sequelae Using a Conventional and Technological-Robotic Approach: The Proposal of INAIL and Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:1593. [PMID: 37297733 PMCID: PMC10252900 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11111593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 sequelae have been shown to affect respiratory and cardiological functions as well as neuro-psychological functions, and, in some cases, metabolic/nutritional aspects. The Italian National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work (Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione Infortuni sul Lavoro, INAIL) recorded that, until December 2022, 315,055 workers were affected by COVID-19; therefore, there is a need to identify an effective approach to treat such patients. Robotic and technological devices could be integrated into the rehabilitation programme of people with long COVID conditions. A review of the literature showed that telerehabilitation may improve functional capacity, dyspnoea, performance, and quality of life in these patients, but no studies were found evaluating the effects of robot-mediated therapy or virtual reality systems. Considering the above, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi and INAIL propose a multi-axial rehabilitation for workers with COVID-19 sequelae. To accomplish this goal, the two institutions merged the epidemiological information gathered by INAIL, the expertise in robotic and technological rehabilitation of Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, and the literature review. Our proposal aims to facilitate a multi-axial rehabilitation approach customized to meet the unique needs of each individual, with a particular emphasis on utilizing advanced technologies to address the current and future challenges of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Aprile
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 50143 Florence, Italy; (I.A.); (V.T.B.); (F.F.); (L.B.)
| | - Lucia Bramante
- Central Medical Department, National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work (INAIL), 00144 Rome, Italy; (L.B.); (C.L.R.); (P.R.)
| | - Chiara La Russa
- Central Medical Department, National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work (INAIL), 00144 Rome, Italy; (L.B.); (C.L.R.); (P.R.)
| | - Marco Germanotta
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 50143 Florence, Italy; (I.A.); (V.T.B.); (F.F.); (L.B.)
| | | | - Francesca Falchini
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 50143 Florence, Italy; (I.A.); (V.T.B.); (F.F.); (L.B.)
| | - Lorenzo Brambilla
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 50143 Florence, Italy; (I.A.); (V.T.B.); (F.F.); (L.B.)
| | - Eugenio Guglielmelli
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 20148 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Patrizio Rossi
- Central Medical Department, National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work (INAIL), 00144 Rome, Italy; (L.B.); (C.L.R.); (P.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim SY, Kim YM, Koo SW, Park HB, Yoon YS. Effects of Therapist Intervention during Upper-Extremity Robotic Rehabilitation in Patients with Stroke. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11101369. [PMID: 37239654 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11101369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to determine whether the treatment effect differs for patients with stroke who perform robot-assisted upper-extremity rehabilitation by themselves compared to those whose rehabilitation is actively assisted by a therapist. Stroke patients with hemiplegia were randomly divided into two groups and received robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation for four weeks. In the experimental group, a therapist actively intervened in the treatment, while in the control group, the therapist only observed. After four weeks of rehabilitation, the manual muscle strength, Brunnstrom stage, Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper-extremity (FMA-UE), box and block test, and functional independence measure (FIM) showed significant improvement in both groups compared to that before treatment; however, no interval change in spasticity was noted. The post-treatment values showed that the FMA-UE and box and block tests were significantly improved in the experimental group compared to those in the control group. Comparing the changes in the pre- and post-treatment values, the FMA-UE, box and block test, and FIM of the experimental group were significantly improved compared to those in the control group. Our results suggest that active intervention by therapists during robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation positively impacts upper-extremity function outcomes in patients with stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si-Yun Kim
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju 54987, Republic of Korea
| | - Yu-Mi Kim
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju 54987, Republic of Korea
| | - See-Won Koo
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju 54987, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Bin Park
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju 54987, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong-Soon Yoon
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju 54987, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Straudi S, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R. Clinical Application of Physical Therapy in Neurorehabilitation. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12082752. [PMID: 37109089 PMCID: PMC10140811 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The knowledge from basic neuroscience studies on mechanisms of motor recovery and the development of theoretical models of learning and recovery has favoured the development and implementation of neurophysiologically sounded rehabilitative interventions [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Straudi
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Ferrara University, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Khokale R, S Mathew G, Ahmed S, Maheen S, Fawad M, Bandaru P, Zerin A, Nazir Z, Khawaja I, Sharif I, Abdin ZU, Akbar A. Virtual and Augmented Reality in Post-stroke Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e37559. [PMID: 37193429 PMCID: PMC10183111 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are noble adjunctive technologies currently being studied for the neuro-rehabilitation of post-stroke patients, potentially enhancing conventional therapy. We explored the literature to find if VR/AR improves neuroplasticity in stroke rehabilitation for a better quality of life. This modality can lay the foundation for telerehabilitation services in remote areas. We analyzed four databases, namely Cochrane Library, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct, by searching the following keywords: ("Stroke Rehabilitation" [Majr]) AND ("Augmented Reality" [Majr]), Virtual Augmented Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation. All the available open articles were reviewed and outlined. The studies conclude that VR/AR can help in early rehabilitation and yield better results in post-stroke patients in adjunct to conventional therapy. However, due to the limited research on this subject, we cannot conclude that this information is absolute. Moreover, VR/AR was seldom customized according to the needs of stroke survivors, which would have given us the full extent of its application. Around the world, stroke survivors are being studied to verify the accessibility and practicality of these innovative technologies. Observations conclude that further exploration of the extent of the implementations and efficacy of VR and AR, combined with conventional rehabilitation, is fundamental.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhutuja Khokale
- Neurology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology LLC, Fairfield, USA
| | | | - Somi Ahmed
- Intensive Care Unit, Sumeru City Hospital, Lalitpur, NPL
| | - Sara Maheen
- General Medicine, Odessa National Medical University, Odessa, UKR
| | - Moiz Fawad
- Neurological Surgery, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, SAU
| | | | - Annu Zerin
- Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, IND
| | - Zahra Nazir
- Internal Medicine, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta, PAK
| | - Imran Khawaja
- Internal Medicine, Ayub Medical Institute, Abottabad, PAK
| | - Imtenan Sharif
- Community Medicine, Quetta Institute of Medical Sciences, Quetta, PAK
| | - Zain U Abdin
- Medicine, District Head Quarter Hospital, Faisalabad, PAK
| | - Anum Akbar
- Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Germanotta M, Cortellini L, Insalaco S, Aprile I. Effects of Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation Compared with Conventional Therapy in Patients with Stroke: Preliminary Results on a Daily Task Assessed Using Motion Analysis. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:3089. [PMID: 36991799 PMCID: PMC10057550 DOI: 10.3390/s23063089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Robotic rehabilitation of the upper limb has demonstrated promising results in terms of the improvement of arm function in post-stroke patients. The current literature suggests that robot-assisted therapy (RAT) is comparable to traditional approaches when clinical scales are used as outcome measures. Instead, the effects of RAT on the capacity to execute a daily life task with the affected upper limb are unknown, as measured using kinematic indices. Through kinematic analysis of a drinking task, we examined the improvement in upper limb performance between patients following a robotic or conventional 30-session rehabilitation intervention. In particular, we analyzed data from nineteen patients with subacute stroke (less than six months following stroke), nine of whom treated with a set of four robotic and sensor-based devices and ten with a traditional approach. According to our findings, the patients increased their movement efficiency and smoothness regardless of the rehabilitative approach. After the treatment (either robotic or conventional), no differences were found in terms of movement accuracy, planning, speed, or spatial posture. This research seems to demonstrate that the two investigated approaches have a comparable impact and may give insight into the design of rehabilitation therapy.
Collapse
|
15
|
RONCONI G, FERRARA PE, NEGRINI F. Lights and shadows of robotic rehabilitation in neurological disorders. GAZZETTA MEDICA ITALIANA ARCHIVIO PER LE SCIENZE MEDICHE 2023. [DOI: 10.23736/s0393-3660.22.04943-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
|
16
|
Zanatta F, Steca P, Fundarò C, Giardini A, Felicetti G, Panigazzi M, Arbasi G, Grilli C, D’Addario M, Pierobon A. Biopsychosocial effects and experience of use of robotic and virtual reality devices in neuromotor rehabilitation: A study protocol. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282925. [PMID: 36897863 PMCID: PMC10004562 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted therapy (RAT) and virtual reality (VR)-based neuromotor rehabilitation have shown promising evidence in terms of patient's neuromotor recovery, so far. However, still little is known on the perceived experience of use of robotic and VR devices and the related psychosocial impact. The present study outlines a study protocol aiming to investigate the biopsychosocial effects and the experience of use of robotic and non-immersive VR devices in patients undergoing neuromotor rehabilitation. METHODS Adopting a prospective, two-arm, non-randomized study design, patients with different neuromotor diseases (i.e., acquired brain injury, Parkinson's Disease, and total knee/hip arthroplasty) undergoing rehabilitation will be included. In a real-world clinical setting, short- (4 weeks) and long-term (6 months) changes in multiple patient's health domains will be investigated, including the functional status (i.e., motor functioning, ADLs, risk of falls), cognitive functioning (i.e., attention and executive functions), physical and mental health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and the psychological status (i.e., anxiety and depression, quality of life satisfaction). At post-intervention, the overall rehabilitation experience, the psychosocial impact of the robotic and VR devices will be assessed, and technology perceived usability and experience of use will be evaluated through a mixed-methods approach, including both patients' and physiotherapists' perspectives. Repeated measures within-between interaction effects will be estimated, and association analyses will be performed to explore the inter-relationships among the variables investigated. Data collection is currently ongoing. IMPLICATIONS The biopsychosocial framework adopted will contribute to expanding the perspective on patient's recovery within the technology-based rehabilitation field beyond motor improvement. Moreover, the investigation of devices experience of use and usability will provide further insight into technology deployment in neuromotor rehabilitation programs, thereby maximising therapy engagement and effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05399043.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Zanatta
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Steca
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Cira Fundarò
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Neurophysiopathology Unit of Montescano Institute, Montescano, Italy
- * E-mail:
| | - Anna Giardini
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Information Technology Department of Pavia Institute, Pavia, Italy
| | - Guido Felicetti
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Neuromotor Rehabilitation Unit of Montescano Institute, Montescano, Italy
| | - Monica Panigazzi
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Occupational Physiatry and Ergonomics Unit of Montescano Institute, Montescano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Arbasi
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Neuromotor Rehabilitation Unit of Montescano Institute, Montescano, Italy
| | - Cesare Grilli
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Occupational Physiatry and Ergonomics Unit of Montescano Institute, Montescano, Italy
| | - Marco D’Addario
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonia Pierobon
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Psychology Unit of Montescano Institute, Montescano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Grosmaire AG, Pila O, Breuckmann P, Duret C. Robot-assisted therapy for upper limb paresis after stroke: Use of robotic algorithms in advanced practice. NeuroRehabilitation 2022; 51:577-593. [PMID: 36530096 DOI: 10.3233/nre-220025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rehabilitation of stroke-related upper limb paresis is a major public health issue. OBJECTIVE Robotic systems have been developed to facilitate neurorehabilitation by providing key elements required to stimulate brain plasticity and motor recovery, namely repetitive, intensive, adaptative training with feedback. Although the positive effect of robot-assisted therapy on motor impairments has been well demonstrated, the effect on functional capacity is less certain. METHOD This narrative review outlines the principles of robot-assisted therapy for the rehabilitation of post-stroke upper limb paresis. RESULTS A paradigm is proposed to promote not only recovery of impairment but also function. CONCLUSION Further studies that would integrate some principles of the paradigm described in this paper are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Gaëlle Grosmaire
- Unité de Neurorééducation, Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre de Rééducation Fonctionnelle Les Trois Soleils, Boissise-Le-Roi, France
| | - Ophélie Pila
- Unité de Neurorééducation, Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre de Rééducation Fonctionnelle Les Trois Soleils, Boissise-Le-Roi, France
| | - Petra Breuckmann
- Unité de Neurorééducation, Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre de Rééducation Fonctionnelle Les Trois Soleils, Boissise-Le-Roi, France
| | - Christophe Duret
- Unité de Neurorééducation, Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre de Rééducation Fonctionnelle Les Trois Soleils, Boissise-Le-Roi, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Morone G, Riener R, Mazzoleni S. Integrating robot-assisted therapy into neurorehabilitation clinical practice: Where are we now? Where are we heading? NeuroRehabilitation 2022; 51:537-539. [PMID: 36502344 DOI: 10.3233/nre-228025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Morone
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.,San Raffaele Institute of Sulmona, Sulmona, Italy
| | - Robert Riener
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Sensory-Motor Systems Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Mazzoleni
- Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy.,The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Morone G, Capone F, Iosa M, Cruciani A, Paolucci M, Martino Cinnera A, Musumeci G, Brunelli N, Costa C, Paolucci S, Di Lazzaro V. May Dual Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhance the Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Therapy for Promoting Upper Limb Recovery in Chronic Stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2022; 36:800-809. [PMID: 36458455 PMCID: PMC9720706 DOI: 10.1177/15459683221138743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance the efficacy of exoskeleton robotic training on upper limb motor functions in patients with chronic stroke. METHODS A prospective, bi-center, double-blind, randomized clinical trial study was performed. Patients with moderate-to-severe stroke (according to The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) were randomly assigned to receive dual or sham tDCS immediately before robotic therapy (10 sessions, 2 weeks). The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer for Upper Extremity, assessed before, after, and at the 12-week follow-up. Neurophysiological evaluation of corticospinal projections to upper limb muscles was performed by recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs). ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT03026712. RESULTS Two hundred and sixty individuals were tested for eligibility, of which 80 were enrolled and agreed to participate. Excluding 14 dropouts, 66 patients were randomly assigned into the 2 groups. Results showed that chronic patients were stable before treatment and significantly improved after that. The records within subject improvements were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, a post-hoc analysis subdividing patients in 2 subgroups based on the presence or absence of MEPs at the baseline showed a significantly higher effect of real tDCS in patients without MEPs when compared to patients with MEPs (F = 4.6, P = .007). CONCLUSION The adjunction of dual tDCS to robotic arm training did not further enhance recovery in the treated sample of patients with chronic stroke. However, a significant improvement in the subgroup of patients with a severe corticospinal dysfunction (as suggested by the absence of MEPs) suggests that they could benefit from such a treatment combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Morone
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
- Giovanni Morone, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, 67100, Italy.
| | - Fioravante Capone
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Iosa
- IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
- Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cruciani
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Paolucci
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Neurology Unit, “M. Bufalini” Hospital, Cesena, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Alex Martino Cinnera
- IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico,” Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Musumeci
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Brunelli
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmelina Costa
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Turolla A, Kiper P, Mazzarotto D, Cecchi F, Colucci M, D'Avenio G, Facciorusso S, Gatti R, Giansanti D, Iosa M, Bonaiuti D, Boldrini P, Mazzoleni S, Posteraro F, Benanti P, Castelli E, Draicchio F, Falabella V, Galeri S, Gimigliano F, Grigioni M, Mazzon S, Morone G, Petrarca M, Picelli A, Senatore M, Turchetti G, Molteni F. Reference theories and future perspectives on robot-assisted rehabilitation in people with neurological conditions: A scoping review and recommendations from the Italian Consensus Conference on Robotics in Neurorehabilitation (CICERONE). NeuroRehabilitation 2022; 51:681-691. [PMID: 36530100 DOI: 10.3233/nre-220160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-based treatments are developing in neurorehabilitation settings. Recently, the Italian National Health Systems recognized robot-based rehabilitation as a refundable service. Thus, the Italian neurorehabilitation community promoted a national consensus on this topic. OBJECTIVE To conceptualize undisclosed perspectives for research and applications of robotics for neurorehabilitation, based on a qualitative synthesis of reference theoretical models. METHODS A scoping review was carried out based on a specific question from the consensus Jury. A foreground search strategy was developed on theoretical models (context) of robot-based rehabilitation (exposure), in neurological patients (population). PubMed and EMBASE® databases were searched and studies on theoretical models of motor control, neurobiology of recovery, human-robot interaction and economic sustainability were included, while experimental studies not aimed to investigate theoretical frameworks, or considering prosthetics, were excluded. RESULTS Overall, 3699 records were screened and finally 9 papers included according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. According to the population investigated, structured information on theoretical models and indications for future research was summarized in a synoptic table. CONCLUSION The main indication from the Italian consensus on robotics in neurorehabilitation is the priority to design research studies aimed to investigate the role of robotic and electromechanical devices in promoting neuroplasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Turolla
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Division of Occupational Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Deborah Mazzarotto
- Medicina Fisica e Riabilitazione, ULSS 4 Veneto Orientale, San Donà di Piave, Italy
| | - Francesca Cecchi
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy
- IRCSS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Firenze, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe D'Avenio
- National Center for Innovative Technologies in Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Gatti
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Giansanti
- National Center for Innovative Technologies in Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Iosa
- Department of Psychology, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Smart Lab, IRCSS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Boldrini
- Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER), Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Mazzoleni
- Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy
- The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Federico Posteraro
- Department of Rehabilitation, AUSL Toscana Nord Ovest - Camaiore, Versilia Hospital, Lucca, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Castelli
- Department of Neurorehabilitation and Robotics, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Draicchio
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Falabella
- Italian Federation of Persons with Spinal Cord Injuries (FAIP Onlus), Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Gimigliano
- Department of Mental, Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Mauro Grigioni
- National Center for Innovative Technologies in Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Mazzon
- Rehabilitation Unit, ULSS (Local Health Authority) Euganea, Camposampiero Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Giovanni Morone
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
- San Raffaele Institute of Sulmona, Sulmona, Italy
| | - Maurizio Petrarca
- Movement Analysis and Robotics Laboratory (MARlab), IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Picelli
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Senatore
- Associazione Italiana dei Terapisti Occupazionali (AITO), Rome, Italy
| | | | - Franco Molteni
- Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Valduce Hospital, Lecco, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Morone G, de Sire A, Martino Cinnera A, Paci M, Perrero L, Invernizzi M, Lippi L, Agostini M, Aprile I, Casanova E, Marino D, La Rosa G, Bressi F, Sterzi S, Giansanti D, Battistini A, Miccinilli S, Filoni S, Sicari M, Petrozzino S, Solaro CM, Gargano S, Benanti P, Boldrini P, Bonaiuti D, Castelli E, Draicchio F, Falabella V, Galeri S, Gimigliano F, Grigioni M, Mazzoleni S, Mazzon S, Molteni F, Petrarca M, Picelli A, Gandolfi M, Posteraro F, Senatore M, Turchetti G, Straudi S. Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation for Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Comprehensive Review. Brain Sci 2021; 11:1630. [PMID: 34942935 PMCID: PMC8699455 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11121630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The upper extremities limitation represents one of the essential functional impairments in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Electromechanics assisted devices and robots are increasingly used in neurorehabilitation to help functional improvement in patients with neurological diseases. This review aimed to systematically report the evidence-based, state-of-art on clinical applications and robotic-assisted arm training (RAT) in motor and functional recovery in subjects affected by cervical spinal cord injury. The present study has been carried out within the framework of the Italian Consensus Conference on "Rehabilitation assisted by robotic and electromechanical devices for persons with disability of neurological origin" (CICERONE). PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) databases were systematically searched from inception to September 2021. The 10-item PEDro scale assessed the study quality for the RCT and the AMSTAR-2 for the systematic review. Two different authors rated the studies included in this review. If consensus was not achieved after discussion, a third reviewer was interrogated. The five-item Oxford CEBM scale was used to rate the level of evidence. A total of 11 studies were included. The selected studies were: two systematic reviews, two RCTs, one parallel-group controlled trial, one longitudinal intervention study and five case series. One RCT was scored as a high-quality study, while the systematic review was of low quality. RAT was reported as feasible and safe. Initial positive effects of RAT were found for arm function and quality of movement in addition to conventional therapy. The high clinical heterogeneity of treatment programs and the variety of robot devices could severely affect the generalizability of the study results. Therefore, future studies are warranted to standardize the type of intervention and evaluate the role of robotic-assisted training in subjects affected by cervical spinal cord injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessandro de Sire
- Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro “Magna Graecia”, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Paci
- AUSL (Unique Sanitary Local Company), 50123 Florence, Italy;
| | - Luca Perrero
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15121 Alessandria, Italy;
| | - Marco Invernizzi
- Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont “A. Avogadro”, 10121 Novara, Italy; (M.I.); (L.L.)
- Translational Medicine, Dipartimento Attività Integrate Ricerca e Innovazione (DAIRI), Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15121 Alessandria, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Lippi
- Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont “A. Avogadro”, 10121 Novara, Italy; (M.I.); (L.L.)
| | - Michela Agostini
- Section of Rehabilitation, Department of Neuroscience, University General Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padua, Italy;
| | - Irene Aprile
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 50123 Florence, Italy;
| | - Emanuela Casanova
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UOC Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (E.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Dario Marino
- IRCCS Neurolysis Center “Bonino Pulejo”, 98124 Messina, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe La Rosa
- C.S.R.—Consorzio Siciliano di Riabilitazione, 95123 Catania, Italy;
| | - Federica Bressi
- Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy; (F.B.); (S.S.); (S.M.)
| | - Silvia Sterzi
- Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy; (F.B.); (S.S.); (S.M.)
| | - Daniele Giansanti
- National Center for Innovative Technologies in Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy; (D.G.); (M.G.)
| | - Alberto Battistini
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UOC Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (E.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Sandra Miccinilli
- Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy; (F.B.); (S.S.); (S.M.)
| | - Serena Filoni
- Padre Pio Foundation and Rehabilitation Center, San Giovanni Rotondo 71013, Italy;
| | - Monica Sicari
- A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.S.); (S.P.)
| | - Salvatore Petrozzino
- A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.S.); (S.P.)
| | | | | | - Paolo Benanti
- Department of Moral Theology, Pontifical Gregorian University, 00187 Rome, Italy;
| | - Paolo Boldrini
- Società Italiana di Medicina Fisica e Riabilitativa (SIMFER), 00198 Rome, Italy; (P.B.); (D.B.)
| | - Donatella Bonaiuti
- Società Italiana di Medicina Fisica e Riabilitativa (SIMFER), 00198 Rome, Italy; (P.B.); (D.B.)
| | - Enrico Castelli
- Paediatric Neurorehabilitation Department, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00163 Rome, Italy;
| | - Francesco Draicchio
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Monte Porzio Catone, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Vincenzo Falabella
- Italian Federation of Persons with Spinal Cord Injuries (Faip Onlus), 00195 Rome, Italy;
| | - Silvia Galeri
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 20148 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesca Gimigliano
- Multidisciplinary Department of Medicine for Surgery and Orthodontics, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Mauro Grigioni
- National Center for Innovative Technologies in Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy; (D.G.); (M.G.)
| | - Stefano Mazzoleni
- Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Politecnico di Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy;
| | - Stefano Mazzon
- AULSS6 (Unique Sanitary Local Company) Euganea Padova, Rehabilitation Department, 35128 Padua, Italy;
| | - Franco Molteni
- Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Valduce Hospital, 23845 Costa Masnaga, Italy;
| | - Maurizio Petrarca
- Movement Analysis and Robotics Laboratory MARlab, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00163 Rome, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Picelli
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.P.); (M.G.)
| | - Marialuisa Gandolfi
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.P.); (M.G.)
| | - Federico Posteraro
- Rehabilitation Department Versilia Hospital, Versilia Hospital AUSL Toscana Nord Ovest, 55049 Lido di Camaiore, Italy;
| | - Michele Senatore
- AITO (Associazione Italiana Terapisti Occupazionali), 00136 Rome, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Turchetti
- Management Institute, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, 56127 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Sofia Straudi
- Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Department, Ferrara University Hospital, 44121 Ferrara, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Opportunities and Problems of the Consensus Conferences in the Care Robotics. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9121624. [PMID: 34946350 PMCID: PMC8701370 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9121624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Care robots represent an opportunity for the health domain. The use of these devices has important implications. They can be used in surgical operating rooms in important and delicate clinical interventions, in motion, in training-and-simulation, and cognitive and rehabilitation processes. They are involved in continuous processes of evolution in technology and clinical practice. Therefore, the introduction into routine clinical practice is difficult because this needs the stability and the standardization of processes. The agreement tools, in this case, are of primary importance for the clinical acceptance and introduction. The opinion focuses on the Consensus Conference tool and: (a) highlights its potential in the field; (b) explores the state of use; (c) detects the peculiarities and problems (d) expresses ideas on how improve its diffusion.
Collapse
|
23
|
Robot-Assisted Training for Upper Limb in Stroke (ROBOTAS): An Observational, Multicenter Study to Identify Determinants of Efficacy. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10225245. [PMID: 34830527 PMCID: PMC8622640 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The loss of arm function is a common and disabling outcome after stroke. Robot-assisted upper limb (UL) training may improve outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of robot-assisted training using end-effector and exoskeleton robots on UL function following a stroke in real-life clinical practice. Methods: A total of 105 patients affected by a first-ever supratentorial stroke were enrolled in 18 neurorehabilitation centers and treated with electromechanically assisted arm training as an add-on to conventional therapy. Both interventions provided either an exoskeleton or an end-effector device (as per clinical practice) and consisted of 20 sessions (3/5 times per week; 6–8 weeks). Patients were assessed by validated UL scales at baseline (T0), post-treatment (T1), and at three-month follow-up (T2). The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper extremity (FMA-UE). Results: FMA-UE improved at T1 by 6 points on average in the end-effector group and 11 points on average in the exoskeleton group (p < 0.0001). Exoskeletons were more effective in the subacute phase, whereas the end-effectors were more effective in the chronic phase (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: robot-assisted training might help improve UL function in stroke patients as an add-on treatment in both subacute and chronic stages. Pragmatic and highmethodological studies are needed to confirm the showed effectiveness of the exoskeleton and end-effector devices.
Collapse
|
24
|
Gimigliano F, Palomba A, Arienti C, Morone G, Perrero L, Agostini M, Aprile I, Paci M, Casanova E, Marino D, LA Rosa G, Bressi F, Sterzi S, Giansanti D, Battistini A, Miccinilli S, Filoni S, Sicari M, Petrozzino S, Solaro CM, Gargano S, Benanti P, Boldrini P, Bonaiuti D, Castelli E, Draicchio F, Falabella V, Galeri S, Grigioni M, Mazzoleni S, Mazzon S, Molteni F, Petrarca M, Picelli A, Posteraro F, Senatore M, Turchetti G, Straudi S. Robot-assisted arm therapy in neurological health conditions: rationale and methodology for the evidence synthesis in the CICERONE Italian Consensus Conference. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 57:824-830. [PMID: 34128606 DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.21.07011-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted Arm Therapy (RAT) has been increasingly applied in the last years for promoting functional recovery in patients with disabilities related to neurological health conditions. Evidence of a knowledge-to-action gap for applying robot-assisted technologies in the rehabilitation of patients with neurological health conditions and the difficulty to apply and tailor the knowledge to the local contexts solicited the need for a national consensus conference on these interventions. AIM This paper aims to explain the methodology used by the working group dedicated to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of RAT in neurological health conditions in the context of the CICERONE Italian Consensus Conference. DESIGN The methodological approach of the working group. SETTING All rehabilitation settings. POPULATION Patients with disability following a neurological health condition. METHODS Following the indications proposed by the Methodological Manual published by the Italian National Institute of Health, a Promoting Committee and a Technical Scientific Committee have been set up. Six working groups (WGs) have been composed to collect evidence on different questions, among which WG2.2 was focused on the effectiveness of RAT in neurological health conditions. RESULTS WG2.2 started its work defining the specific research questions. It was decided to adopt the ICF as the reference framework for the reporting of all outcomes. Literature search, data extraction and qualitative assessment, evidence analysis and synthesis have been performed. CONCLUSIONS This paper summarizes the methodological approaches used by the WG2.2 of the CICERONE Italian Consensus Conference to define the effectiveness of RAT in the management of patients with neurological health conditions. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT WG2.2 synthesis might help clinicians, researchers, and all rehabilitation stakeholders to address the use of RAT in the Individualized Rehabilitation Plan, to guide the allocation of resources and define clinical protocols and indications for the management of patients with different neurological health conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Gimigliano
- Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Angela Palomba
- Multidisciplinary Department of Medicine for Surgery and Orthodontics, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy -
| | | | | | - Luca Perrero
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | | | - Irene Aprile
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy
| | - Matteo Paci
- AUSL (Unique Sanitary Local Company) District of Central Tuscany, Florence, Italy
| | - Emanuela Casanova
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UOC Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Bologna, Italia
| | - Dario Marino
- IRCCS Neurolysis Center "Bonino Pulejo", Messina, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Daniele Giansanti
- National Center for Innovative Technologies in Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Battistini
- AUSL (Unique Sanitary Local Company) District of Central Tuscany, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Serena Filoni
- Padre Pio Foundation and Rehabilitation Centers, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - Monica Sicari
- A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Paolo Boldrini
- Società Italiana di Medicina Fisica e Riabilitativa (SIMFER)
| | | | - Enrico Castelli
- Paediatric Neurorehabilitation, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Draicchio
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Monte Porzio Catone, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Falabella
- President Italian Federation of Persons with Spinal Cord Injuries (Faip Onlus), Rome, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Grigioni
- National Center for Innovative Technologies in Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Mazzoleni
- Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Stefano Mazzon
- Rehabilitation Department, AULSS6 (Unique Sanitary Local Company) Euganea Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Petrarca
- "Bambino Gesù" Children's Hospital - IRCCS, Movement Analysis and Robotics Laboratory MARlab, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Picelli
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Federico Posteraro
- Versilia Hospital AUSL Toscana Nord Ovest, Lido di Camaiore, Lucca, Italy
| | | | | | - Sofia Straudi
- Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Department, Ferrara University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|