1
|
Porreca A, Di Nicola M, Lucarelli G, Dorin VM, Soria F, Terracciano D, Mistretta FA, Luzzago S, Buonerba C, Cantiello F, Mari A, Minervini A, Veccia A, Antonelli A, Musi G, Hurle R, Busetto GM, Del Giudice F, Ferretti S, Perdonà S, Prete PD, Porreca A, Bove P, Crisan N, Russo GI, Damiano R, Amparore D, Porpiglia F, Autorino R, Piccinelli M, Brescia A, Tătaru SO, Crocetto F, Giudice AL, de Cobelli O, Schips L, Ferro M, Marchioni M. Time to progression is the main predictor of survival in patients with high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: Results from a machine learning-based analysis of a large multi-institutional database. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:69.e17-69.e25. [PMID: 38302296 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients affected by high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) progression to muscle invasive status is considered as the main indicator of local treatment failure. We aimed to investigate the effect of progression and time to progression on overall survival (OS) and to investigate their validity as surrogate endpoints. METHODS A total of 1,510 patients from 18 different institutions treated for T1 high grade NMIBC, followed by a secondary transurethral resection and BCG intravesical instillation. We relied on random survival forest (RSF) to rank covariates based on OS prediction. Cox's regression models were used to quantify the effect of covariates on mortality. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 49.0 months, 485 (32.1%) patients progressed to MIBC, while 163 (10.8%) patients died. The median time to progression was 82 (95%CI: 78.0-93.0) months. In RSF time-to-progression and age were the most predictive covariates of OS. The survival tree defined 5 groups of risk. In multivariable Cox's regression models accounting for progression status as time-dependent covariate, shorter time to progression (as continuous covariate) was associated with longer OS (HR: 9.0, 95%CI: 3.0-6.7; P < 0.001). Virtually same results after time to progression stratification (time to progression ≥10.5 months as reference). CONCLUSION Time to progression is the main predictor of OS in patients with high risk NMIBC treated with BCG and might be considered a coprimary endpoint. In addition, models including time to progression could be considered for patients' stratification in clinical practice and at the time of clinical trials design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annamaria Porreca
- Biostatistics Laboratory, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Marta Di Nicola
- Biostatistics Laboratory, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Vartolomei Mihai Dorin
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Buonerba
- CRTR Rare Tumors Reference Center, AOU Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Francesco Cantiello
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Simone Ferretti
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Uro-Gynecological Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Fondazione "G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Paola Del Prete
- Scientific Directorate, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Fondazione "G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Department of Robotic Urologic Surgery, Abano Terme Hospital, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bove
- Division of Urology, Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicolae Crisan
- Department of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Haţieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Rocco Damiano
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Mattia Piccinelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Brescia
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sabin Octavian Tătaru
- I.O.S.U.D., George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | | | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Schips
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grabe-Heyne K, Henne C, Mariappan P, Geiges G, Pöhlmann J, Pollock RF. Intermediate and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an overview of epidemiology, burden, and unmet needs. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1170124. [PMID: 37333804 PMCID: PMC10272547 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1170124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer ranks among the most common cancers globally. At diagnosis, 75% of patients have non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Patients with low-risk NMIBC have a good prognosis, but recurrence and progression rates remain high in intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC, despite the decades-long availability of effective treatments for NMIBC such as intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). The present review provides an overview of NMIBC, including its burden and treatment options, and then reviews aspects that counteract the successful treatment of NMIBC, referred to as unmet treatment needs. The scale and reasons for each unmet need are described based on a comprehensive review of the literature, including insufficient adherence to treatment guidelines by physicians because of insufficient knowledge, training, or access to certain therapy options. Low rates of lifestyle changes and treatment completion by patients, due to BCG shortages or toxicities and adverse events as well as their impact on social activities, represent additional areas of potential improvement. Highly heterogeneous evidence for the effectiveness and safety of some treatments limits the comparability of results across studies. As a result, efforts are underway to standardize treatment schedules for BCG, but intravesical chemotherapy schedules remain unstandardized. In addition, risk-scoring models often perform unsatisfactorily due to significant differences between derivation and real-world cohorts. Reporting in clinical trials suffers from a lack of consistent outcomes reporting in bladder cancer clinical trials, paired with an under-representation of racial and ethnic minorities in many trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paramananthan Mariappan
- Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery (EBCS), Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Georgiou M, Ridzuan-Allen A, Chamsin A, Siddiqui Z, Tolofari S, Ejikeme C, Jones R, Napier-Hemy TP, Rotas S, Hughes KE, Khattak AQ, McCabe JE, Omar AM, Mistry R, Samsudin A, Gana HBY, Floyd MS. Emergency Urology procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: A 3-month prospective study. Urologia 2022:3915603221136321. [PMID: 36346172 PMCID: PMC9646888 DOI: 10.1177/03915603221136321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE COVID-19 resulted in Regional tiered restrictions being introduced across the UK with subsequent implications for planned and emergency surgical care. Specific to Merseyside, Tier 4, Tier 2 and Tier 5 restrictions were introduced in late 2020 and early 2021. The purpose of this study was to examine the nature and workload of emergency urological procedures during three different national lockdown Tiers in the North West of England. METHOD A 3-month prospective study examining all emergency urological activity was conducted from November 2020 when Tier 4 restrictions were introduced and included Tier 2 restrictions in December and then concluded at the end of January 2021 when Tier 5 restrictions were in place. Data was obtained by identifying patients using the electronic theatre listing system. RESULTS A total of 71 emergency cases were performed (24 in November (Tier 4), 28 in December (Tier 2), 19 in January 2021 (Tier 5)) with 15 different types of procedures performed. The most frequently performed procedure was stent insertion (36), followed by scrotal exploration (10). The least commonly performed procedure was suprapubic catheter insertion under general anaesthesia (1). One patient required transfer to a different hospital. In total 6 calls were made by general surgery and 3 by gynaecology for urgent urological assistance in theatre. Three urology patients returned to the theatre as emergencies following elective procedures. CONCLUSION Unlike the Spring lockdown, acute urological presentations requiring operative intervention still presented daily. Of the 71 cases performed, most occurred in Tier 2. Stent insertion was the most commonly performed procedure, with the majority of the cases performed by registrars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marita Georgiou
- Marita Georgiou, Department of Urology, St
Helens and Knowsley NHS Trust, Whiston Hospital, Prescot L35 5DR, Merseyside,
UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Neuzillet Y, Pradère B, Xylinas E, Allory Y, Audenet F, Loriot Y, Masson-Lecomte A, Roumiguié M, Seisen T, Traxer O, Leon P, Roupret M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Prog Urol 2022; 32:1102-1140. [PMID: 36400479 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To update the ccAFU recommendations for the management of bladder tumours that do not infiltrate the bladder muscle (NBMIC). METHODS A systematic review (Medline) of the literature from 2020 to 2022 was performed, taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and surveillance of NMIBC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence. RESULTS The diagnosis of NMIBC (Ta, T1, CIS) is made after complete full-thickness tumour resection. The use of bladder fluorescence and the indication of a second look (4-6 weeks) help to improve the initial diagnosis. The EORTC score is used to assess the risk of recurrence and/or tumour progression. Through the stratification of patients in low, intermediate and high-risk categories, adjuvant treatment can be proposed: intravesical chemotherapy (immediate postoperative, initiation regimen) or BCG (initiation and maintenance regimen) instillations, or even the indication of cystectomy for BCG-resistant patients. CONCLUSION Updating the ccAFU recommendations should contribute to improving patient management, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of NMIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Neuzillet
- Service d'Urologie, hôpital Foch, Université Paris Saclay, Suresnes, France.
| | - B Pradère
- Service d'Urologie UROSUD, Clinique Croix Du Sud, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Y Allory
- Service d'Anatomopathologie, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - F Audenet
- Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Y Loriot
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Service d'Urologie, CHU de Toulouse, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - T Seisen
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - O Traxer
- Sorbonne Université, GRC#20 Lithiase Urinaire et EndoUrologie, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - P Leon
- Service d'Urologie, clinique Pasteur, Royan, France
| | - M Roupret
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|