Canine and Feline Parasitology: Analogies, Differences, and Relevance for Human Health

Cats and dogs are treated as family members by most pet owners. Therefore, a high quality of veterinary care and preventive medicine is imperative for animal health and welfare and for the protection of humans from zoonotic pathogens. There is a general perception of cats being treated as "small dogs," especially in the field of clinical parasitology. As a result, several important differences between the two animal species are not taken into proper consideration and are often overlooked. Dogs and cats are profoundly different under evolutionary, biological, ethological, behavioral, and immunological standpoints. These differences impact clinical features, diagnosis, and control of canine and feline parasites and transmission risk for humans. This review outlines the most common parasitoses and vector-borne diseases of dogs and cats, with a focus on major convergences and divergences, and discusses parasites that have (i) evolved based on different preys for dogs and cats, (ii) adapted due to different immunological or behavioral animal profiles, and (iii) developed more similarities than differences in canine and feline infections and associated diseases. Differences, similarities, and peculiarities of canine and feline parasitology are herein reviewed in three macrosections: (i) carnivorism, vegetarianism, anatomy, genetics, and parasites, (ii) evolutionary adaptation of nematodes, including veterinary reconsideration and zoonotic importance, and (iii) behavior and immune system driving ectoparasites and transmitted diseases. Emphasis is given to provide further steps toward a more accurate evaluation of canine and feline parasitology in a changing world in terms of public health relevance and One Health approach.

First Case of Idiopathic Eosinophilic Meningoencephalitis in a Sheep

A 1.5-year-old ewe was presented with neurological signs that had been observed from about 2 days prior to death. There had been no clinical response to anti-inflammatory and antibiotic treatment. Histopathological examination of the brain revealed a severe and widespread eosinophilic meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown aetiology. Defining histological features included diffuse angiocentric eosinophilic infiltrates in the neuroparenchyma and meninges, neuronal necrosis, astrocytosis, neuropil vacuolation and occasional glial scars. Differential diagnostics for eosinophilic meningoencephalitis were taken into account and investigated by means of special stains, immunohistochemistry, bacteriology and polymerase chain reaction. No pathological changes or ancillary tests were supportive or revealed a specific aetiology for the condition and therefore it was considered idiopathic. Idiopathic meningoencephalitis is a rare disease, mainly described in man and rarely in dogs, with no apparent aetiological cause or potential breed predisposition. To our knowledge this is the first case of idiopathic eosinophilic meningoencephalitis in a sheep and provides a histopathological guideline for prospective comparative pathology studies.