Effects of the Intensity and Activity Time of Early Rehabilitation on Activities of Daily Living Dependence in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Structural Modeling of Early Ambulation Progression in Patients with Acute Stroke: A Covariance Structure Analysis Approach

Objectives

This study used structural equation modeling (SEM) to elucidate the causal relationships between Functional Independence Measure (FIM) items and consciousness levels in patients with stroke and low consciousness levels 2 weeks after initiating occupational therapy (OT). This modeling sought to identify the factors influencing the number of days required to get out of bed.

Methods

SEM was used for multifactorial simultaneous analysis in a study of 22 patients with a Japan Coma Scale score of 20 after stroke. The Glasgow Coma Scale was used to evaluate patients' consciousness level; FIMs were used to evaluate activities of daily living in the ward. Influencing factors, including "bed/chair transfers" and "toilet transfers," were defined as "transfer functions," while factors involving "social interactions," "comprehension," "memory," "problem solving," and "expression" were defined as "cognitive decline."

Results

After 2 weeks, standardized coefficients showed that "transfer functions" and "cognitive decline" had effects of -0.33 and -0.25, respectively, on "early ambulation days." Further analysis revealed that improvements in "consciousness level" impacted "early ambulation days," with coefficients of -0.35 for "transfer functions" and 0.14 for "cognitive decline." Through the "consciousness level" observation variable, the coefficients of indirect effects were -0.27 for "transfer function" on "days to get out of bed," 0.38 for "cognitive decline," and -0.06 for "self-care" on "early ambulation days."

Conclusions

Improvement in transfer movements and cognitive decline influenced the number of days required to get out of bed without improving consciousness or affecting early ambulation.

Evaluating Short-Term Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Total Hip and Knee Replacement: A Comprehensive Review

Total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) are widely performed surgical procedures to alleviate pain and improve function in patients with joint-related diseases. Short-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become a key metric in assessing the success of these surgeries from the patient's perspective, focusing on early recovery, pain management, mobility, and quality of life. This comprehensive review evaluates the significance of short-term PROMs following THR and TKR, highlighting commonly used tools such as the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and short-form health survey (SF-36). The analysis explores the impact of various factors, such as age, preoperative health status, and surgical technique, on short-term outcomes. Findings from recent studies indicate that while patients generally report improvements in physical function and pain relief within the first six months post-surgery, individual outcomes can vary significantly. Factors like early rehabilitation, mental health, and the presence of postoperative complications can influence the trajectory of recovery and satisfaction levels. Moreover, the review addresses the limitations of current PROMs, including variability in reporting and sensitivity to different patient populations. This review emphasizes the need for more personalized and standardized approaches to PROM assessment to better capture patient experiences and optimize postoperative care. Future research should focus on integrating PROMs with long-term follow-up data and digital health tools to track real-time patient progress, thus enhancing the overall quality of care for THR and TKR patients. Short-term PROMs play a vital role in understanding patient outcomes and guiding clinical practice for joint replacement surgeries.

Effect of Adding Early Bedside Cycling to Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation on Physical Function and Length of Stay After Heart Valve Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether adding bedside cycling to inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) early after heart valve surgery could lead to better physical function and shorter length of hospital stays.

DESIGN

This is a single-centered, randomized, controlled, parallel-group intervention study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at the National Heart Institute from December 2022 to June 2023.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-one patients following heart valve surgery completed this study after being randomized into 2 groups: an intervention group (n1=16) and an active control group (n2=15). Eligibility criteria were heart valve surgery with median sternotomy, clinical stability, and age from 20 to 40 years.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention group received early bedside cycling for the lower limbs, using a mini bike, in addition to an inpatient CR program, and the control group received the inpatient CR program alone.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome was the physical functional capacity assessed by the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). The secondary outcomes were the Barthel Index (BI), the forced vital capacity (FVC), the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, the total length of hospital stay, and the physical component summary (PCS) of the 12-item Short Form (SF-12) Health Survey.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed significantly greater 6MWD (P<.001), BI score (P<.001), and FVC (P=.006) at hospital discharge, and shorter ICU stay (P=.002) and total hospital stay (P=.015). At 1-month follow-up, the intervention group showed a non-significantly higher PCS mean score than the control group (P=.057).

CONCLUSION

Adding early bedside cycling to a usual inpatient CR program after heart valve surgery could induce significantly greater short-term physical functional capacity as assessed by the 6MWD, better activities of daily living as evaluated by the BI, higher pulmonary function as measured by the FVC, and shorter lengths of ICU and total hospital stays than the usual inpatient CR program alone.

Effects of the High-Intensity Early Mobilization on Long-Term Functional Status of Patients with Mechanical Ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit

Objective

Intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness often occurs in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Early active mobility may reduce ICU-acquired weakness, improve functional status, and reduce disability. The aim of this study was to investigate whether high-intensity early mobility improves post-ICU discharge functional status of IMV patients.

Methods

132 adult patients in the ICU who were undergoing IMV were randomly assigned into two groups with a ratio of 1 : 1, with one group received high-intensity early mobility (intervention group, IG), while the other group received conventional treatment (control group, CG). The functional status (Barthel Index (BI)), capacity of mobility (Perme score and ICU Mobility Scale (IMS)), muscle strength (Medical Research Council sum scores (MRC-SS)), mortality, complication, length of ICU stay, and duration of IMV were evaluated at ICU discharge or after 3-month of ICU discharge.

Results

The patient's functional status was improved (BI scores 90.6 ± 18.0 in IG vs. 77.7 ± 27.9 in CG; p=0.005), and capacity of mobility was increased (Perme score 17.6 ± 7.1 in IG vs. 12.2 ± 8.5 in CG, p < 0.001; IMS 4.7 ± 2.6 in IG vs. 3.0 ± 2.6 in CG, p < 0.001). The IG had a higher muscle strength and lower incidence of ICU-acquired weakness (ICUAW) than that in the CG. The incidence of mortality and delirium was also lower than CG at ICU discharge. However, there were no differences in terms of length of ICU stay, duration of IMV, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and venous thrombosis.

Conclusions

High-intensity early mobility improved the patient's functional status and increased capacity of mobility with IMV. The benefits to functional status remained after 3 month of ICU discharge. Other benefits included higher muscle strength, lower incidence of ICUAW, mortality, and delirium in IG.

Association Between Mobilization Level And Activity of Daily Living Independence in Critically Ill Patients

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between the mobilization level during intensive care unit (ICU) admission and independence in activity of daily living (ADL), defined as Barthel Index (BI)≥70.

METHODS

This was a post-hoc analysis of the EMPICS study involving nine hospitals. Consecutive patients who spend >48 hours in the ICU were eligible for inclusion. Mobilization was performed at each hospital according to the shared protocol and the highest ICU mobility score (IMS) during the ICU stay, baseline characteristics, and BI at hospital discharge. Multiple logistic regression analysis, adjusted for baseline characteristics, was used to deter-mine the association between the highest IMS (using the receiver operating characteristic [ROC]) and ADL.

RESULTS

Of the 203 patients, 143 were assigned to the ADL independence group and 60 to the ADL dependence group. The highest IMS score was significantly higher in the ADL independence group than in the dependence group and was a predictor of ADL independence at hospital discharge (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.38; adjusted p=0.002). The ROC cutoff value for the highest IMS was 6 (specificity, 0.67; sensitivity, 0.70; area under the curve, 0.69).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that, in patients who were in the ICU for more than 48 hours, that patients with good function in the ICU also exhibit good function upon discharge. However, prospective, multicenter trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.

The optimal dose of mobilisation therapy in the ICU: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the impact of duration of early mobilisation on survivors of critical illness. The hypothesis was that interventions lasting over 40 min, as per the German guideline, positively affect the functional status at ICU discharge.

METHODS

Prospective single-centre cohort study conducted in two ICUs in Germany. In 684 critically ill patients surviving an ICU stay > 24 h, out-of-bed mobilisation of more than 40 min was evaluated.

RESULTS

Daily mobilisation ≥ 40 min was identified as an independent predictor of an improved functional status upon ICU discharge. This effect on the primary outcome measure, change of Mobility-Barthel until ICU discharge, was observed in three different models for baseline patient characteristics (average treatment effect (ATE), all three models p < 0.001). When mobilisation parameters like level of mobilisation, were included in the analysis, the average treatment effect disappeared [ATE 1.0 (95% CI - 0.4 to 2.4), p = 0.16].

CONCLUSIONS

A mobilisation duration of more than 40 min positively impacts functional outcomes at ICU discharge. However, the maximum level achieved during ICU stay was the most crucial factor regarding adequate dosage, as higher duration did not show an additional benefit in patients with already high mobilisation levels.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospective Registry of Mobilization-, Routine- and Outcome Data of Intensive Care Patients (MOBDB), NCT03666286. Registered 11 September 2018-retrospectively registered, https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT03666286 .

Comparison of postoperative mobilization measurements by activPAL versus Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility scale after major abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

The Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility scale is a validated tool for assessing patient mobility in the hospital. It has excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliabilities, but it is unknown how accurately Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility documentation reflects the patients' mobility performance in the immediate postoperative period compared to objective measures such as accelerometers.

METHODS

In this single-center observational study, consented adults undergoing open abdominal surgery wore a research-grade accelerometer, activPAL, starting immediately postoperatively until hospital discharge or up to 7 days. We collected the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility scores documented by hospital staff via retrospective chart review and evaluated their accuracy in describing the type, frequency, and volume of postoperative out-of-bed mobilization using the activPAL as the criterion.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 56 participants. The activPAL showed that participants spent 97.7% of their time lying in bed or sitting in a chair. Meanwhile, the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility documentation of preambulatory activities (scores 1-5) was rare. The activPAL detected 4 times more out-of-bed mobilization than routine Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility documentation. Whereas the frequency of activPAL-measured out-of-bed mobilization increased steadily to a median of 9 sessions by postoperative day 6, the number of Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility documentation remained around twice daily. ActivPAL measurements demonstrated that Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility documentation of ambulatory sessions (scores 6-8) was accurate.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that routine Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility documentation did not accurately detect preambulatory activities or the overall frequency of out-of-bed mobility sessions, poorly reflecting the highly sedentary behaviors of the acute postoperative inpatients and highlighting the need to improve clinical documentation or use alternative methods to track postoperative mobilization.

Predictive factors and clinical impact of ICU-acquired weakness on functional disability in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Patients with critical COVID-19 often require invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), resulting in a higher incidence of ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) and functional decline.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the causes of ICU-AW and functional outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19 who required IMV.

METHODS

This prospective, single-center, observational study included COVID-19 patients who required IMV for ≥48 h in the ICU between July 2020 and July 2021. ICU-AW was defined as a Medical Research Council sum score <48 points. The primary outcome was functional independence during hospitalization, defined as an ICU mobility score ≥9 points.

RESULTS

A total of 157 patients (age: 68 [59-73] years, men: 72.6%) were divided into two groups (ICU-AW group; n = 80 versus non-ICU-AW; n = 77). Older age (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.05 [1.01-1.11], p = 0.036), administration of neuromuscular blocking agents (7.79 [2.87-23.3], p < 0.001), pulse steroid therapy (3.78 [1.49-10.1], p = 0.006), and sepsis (7.79 [2.87-24.0], p < 0.001) were significantly associated with ICU-AW development. In addition, patients with ICU-AW had significantly longer time to functional independence than those without ICU-AW (41 [30-54] vs 19 [17-23] days, p < 0.001). The development of ICU-AW was associated with delayed time to functional independence (adjusted hazard ratio: 6.08; 95% CI: 3.05-12.1; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of the patients with COVID-19 requiring IMV developed ICU-AW, which was associated with delayed functional independence during hospitalization.

Optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy for ICU patients with sepsis

Background

For patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis, mobilization therapy during ICU stay can improve their outcomes during and after the ICU stay. However, little is known about the optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study using data from a tertiary medical center in Japan during 2013–2017. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years who were admitted to the ICU with sepsis based on the Sepsis-3 criteria. We defined early mobilization (EM) as the rehabilitation at the level of sitting on the edge of the bed or more within the first 3 days of the patients’ ICU stay. Patients were divided into the EM and non-EM groups. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and ambulatory dependence at hospital discharge. We estimated the effects of EM by stabilized inverse probability weighting (sIPW). We then tested alternative definitions of EM by changing the cutoff in days to mobilization by 1-day increments from 2 to 7 days to investigate the optimal timing of mobilization.

Results

Our study sample consisted of a total of 296 septic patients, including 96 patients in the EM group and 200 patients in the non-EM group. In the sIPW model, the adjusted OR for in-hospital mortality in the EM group compared to the non-EM group was 0.22 [95% CI 0.06–0.88], and the adjusted OR for ambulatory dependence at the hospital discharge was 0.24 [95% CI 0.09–0.61]. When alternative definitions of EM were tested, patients who achieved mobilization within the first 2–4 days of their ICU stays had better outcomes.

Conclusions

Achieving mobilization within the first 3 days of ICU stay was significantly associated with better outcomes. Patients with sepsis might benefit most from achieving mobilization within 2–4 days. Further studies are warranted to validate the findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40560-022-00613-8.