Clinical observation of standing trunk movements: what do the aberrant movement patterns tell us?

Assessment of Hip Abduction Motion Assistance Using a Single-Joint Hybrid Assistive Limb Robot: Feasibility and Safety Evaluation in Healthy Adults

Background/Objectives: Preoperative muscle atrophy leads to persistent gait abnormalities in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Efficient motor learning of the gluteus medius is crucial for their recovery. In this study, a single-joint hybrid assistive limb (HAL) was developed to assist hip abduction. We aimed to evaluate the muscle activity and safety of this device during hip abduction in healthy adults. Methods: Ten healthy adults (five males and five females; mean age, 40.7 years) with no hip disorders performed one set of 30 repetitions of side-lying hip abduction under three conditions: without HAL (pre-HAL), with HAL, and without HAL (post-HAL). Muscle activities of the gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, tensor fasciae latae, rectus femoris, and biceps femoris (expressed as percentage of maximum voluntary contraction [%MVC]); vital signs; hip visual analog scale (VAS); and hip abduction and flexion angles were assessed. The mean values were compared among the conditions. Results: The %MVC of the gluteus medius significantly increased from 52% (pre-HAL) to 75.4% (HAL) and then decreased slightly to 61.6% (post-HAL). No other muscle groups showed significant changes. Vital signs and hip VAS scores showed no significant variation. Although no significant differences were found in the hip abduction and flexion angles, a reduction in the hip flexion angle was observed in the HAL and post-HAL conditions. Conclusions: The hip abduction HAL effectively and safely enhanced gluteus medius activity. Reduction in the hip flexion angle during HAL and post-HAL suggests the possibility of appropriate abduction movements and motor learning effects.

Association between movement speed and instability catch kinematics and the differences between individuals with and without chronic low back pain

Studies reported the existence of instability catch (IC) during trunk flexion in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, different movement speeds can cause different neuromuscular demands resulting in altered kinematic patterns. In addition, kinematic characterization corresponding to clinical observation of IC is still limited. Therefore, this study aimed to determine (1) the association between movement speed and kinematic parameters representing IC during trunk flexion and (2) the differences in kinematic parameters between individuals with and without CLBP. Fifteen no low back pain (NoLBP) and 15 CLBP individuals were recruited. Inertial measurement units (IMU) were attached to T3, L1, and S2 spinous processes. Participants performed active trunk flexion while IMU data were simultaneously collected. Total trunk, lumbar, and pelvic mean angular velocity (T_MV, L_MV, and P_MV), as well as number of zero-crossings, peak-to-peak, and area of sudden deceleration and acceleration (Num, P2P, and Area), were derived. Pearson's correlation tests were used to determine the association between T_MV and L_MV, P_MV, Num, P2P, and Area. An ANCOVA was performed to determine the difference in kinematic parameters between groups using movement speed as a covariate. Significant associations (P < 0.05) were found between movement speed and other kinematic parameters, except for Area. Results showed that L_MV significantly differed from the P_MV (P = 0.002) in the CLBP group, while a significant between-group difference (P = 0.037) was found in the P_MV. Additionally, significant between-group differences (P < 0.05) in P2P and Area were observed. The associations between movement speed and kinematic parameters suggest that movement speed changes can alter kinematic patterns. Therefore, clinicians may challenge lumbopelvic neuromuscular control by modifying movement speed to elicit greater change in kinematic patterns. In addition, the NoLBP group used shared lumbar and pelvic contributions, while the CLBP group used less pelvic contribution. Finally, P2P and Area appeared to offer the greatest sensitivity to differentiate between the groups. Overall, these findings may enhance the understanding of the mechanism underlying IC in CLBP.

Effects of combined anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and motor control exercise on cortical topography and muscle activation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Aberrant movement in chronic low back pain (CLBP) is associated with a deficit in the lumbar multifidus (LM) and changes in cortical topography. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) can be used to enhance cortical excitability by priming the neuromuscular system for motor control exercise (MCE), thereby enhancing LM activation and movement control. This study aimed to determine the effects of a 6-week MCE program combined with a-tDCS on cortical topography, LM activation, movement patterns, and clinical outcomes in individuals with CLBP.

METHODS

Twenty-two individuals with CLBP were randomly allocated to the a-tDCS group (a-tDCS; n = 12) or sham-tDCS group (s-tDCS; n = 10). Both groups received 20 min of tDCS followed by 30 min of MCE. The LM and erector spinae (ES) cortical topography, LM activation, movement control battery tests, and clinical outcomes (disability and quality of life) were measured pre- and post-intervention.

RESULTS

Significant interaction (group × time; p < 0.01) was found in the distance between LM and ES cortical locations. The a-tDCS group demonstrated significantly fewer discrete peaks (p < 0.05) in both ES and LM and significant improvements (p < 0.05) in clinical outcomes post-intervention. The s-tDCS group demonstrated a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the number of discrete peaks in the LM cortical topography. No significant changes (p > 0.05) in LM activation were observed in either group; however, both groups demonstrated improved movement patterns.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that combined a-tDCS with MCE can separate LM and ES locations over time while s-tDCS (MCE alone) reduces the distance. Our study did not find superior benefits of adding a-tDCS before MCE for LM activation, movement patterns, or clinical outcomes.

Differences in the organization of the primary motor cortex in people with and without low back pain and associations with motor control and sensory tests

Differences in organization of the primary motor cortex and altered trunk motor control (sensing, processing and motor output) have been reported in people with low back pain (LBP). Little is known to what extent these differences are related. We investigated differences in 1) organization of the primary motor cortex and 2) motor and sensory tests between people with and without LBP, and 3) investigated associations between the organization of the primary motor cortex and motor and sensory tests. We conducted a case-control study in people with (N=25) and without (N=25) LBP. The organization of the primary motor cortex (Center of Gravity (CoG) and Area of the cortical representation of trunk muscles) was assessed using neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation, based on individual MRIs. Sensory tests (quantitative sensory testing, graphaesthesia, two-point discrimination threshold) and a motor test (spiral-tracking test) were assessed. Participants with LBP had a more lateral and lower location of the CoG and a higher temporal summation of pain. For all participants combined, better vibration test scores were associated with a more anterior, lateral, and lower CoG and a better two-point discrimination threshold was associated with a lower CoG. A small subset of variables showed significance. Although this aligns with the concept of altered organization of the primary motor cortex in LBP, there is no strong evidence of the association between altered organization of the primary motor cortex and motor and sensory test performance in LBP. Focusing on subgroup analyses regarding pain duration can be a topic for future research.

Clinically assessed lumbopelvic sensorimotor control tests in low back pain: are they actually valid? A systematic review according to COSMIN guidelines

BACKGROUND

Impairments in lumbopelvic sensorimotor control (SMC) are thought to be one of the underlying mechanisms for the recurrence and persistence of low back pain (LBP). As such, lumbopelvic SMC tests are frequently included in the clinical examination of patients with LBP.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate convergent and known-groups validity of clinically assessed lumbopelvic SMC tests in patients with LBP according to COSMIN guidelines.

DESIGN

Systematic review METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched until December 2023. Studies examining convergent or known-groups validity of lumbopelvic SMC tests assessed via inspection or palpation in patients with LBP were included. Known-groups validity had to be assessed between patients with LBP and pain-free persons. Two independent researchers appraised risk of bias and quality of evidence (QoE) using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist and modified GRADE approach, respectively. Results for known-groups validity were reported separately for single tests and test-clusters.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (946 participants) were included. Three studies investigated convergent validity of three single tests. Regarding known-groups validity, six studies evaluated six single tests and four studies investigated two test-clusters. For only one test, both convergent and known-groups were assessed. The QoE for tests showing sufficient convergent or known-groups validity was (very) low, whereas QoE was moderate for single tests or test-clusters with insufficient known-groups validity.

CONCLUSION

All clinically assessed lumbopelvic SMC tests with sufficient convergent or known-groups validity had (very) low QoE. Therefore, test outcomes should be interpreted cautiously and strong reliance on these outcomes for clinical decision-making can currently not be recommended.

Precision Rehabilitation After Neurostimulation Implantation for Multifidus Dysfunction in Nociceptive Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a debilitating, painful, and costly condition. Implantable neuromuscular electrical stimulation targeting the multifidus musculature is growing as a non-pharmacologic option for patients with recalcitrant nociceptive mechanical CLBP who have failed conservative treatments (including medications and physical therapy) and for whom surgery is not indicated. Properly selecting patients who meet specific criteria (based on historical results from randomized controlled trials), who diligently adhere to implant usage and precisely implement neuromuscular rehabilitation, improve success of significant functional recovery, as well as pain medication reductions. Patients with nociceptive mechanical CLBP who underwent implanted multifidus neurostimulation have been treated by physicians and rehabilitation specialists who have honed their experience working with multifidus neurostimulation. They have collaborated on consensus and evidence-driven guidelines to improve quality outcomes and to assist providers when encountering patients with this device. Physicians and physical therapists together provide precision patient-centric medical management with quality neuromuscular rehabilitation to encourage patients to be experts of both their implants and quality spine motion to help override long-standing multifidus dysfunction related to their CLBP.

How do people with chronic low back pain pick a pencil off the floor?

BACKGROUND

Picking objects off the floor is provocative for people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). There are no clinically applicable methods evaluating movement strategies for this task. The relationship between strategy and multidimensional profiles is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

Develop a movement evaluation tool (MET) to examine movement strategies in people with CLBP (n = 289) picking a pencil off the floor. Describe those movement strategies, and determine reliability of the MET. Explore differences across multidimensional profiles and movement strategies.

METHODS

An MET was developed using literature and iterative processes, and its inter-rater agreement determined. Latent class analysis (LCA) derived classes demonstrating different strategies using six movement parameters as indicator variables. Differences between classes across multidimensional profiles were investigated using analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, or chi-squared tests.

RESULTS

Six movement parameters were evaluated. There was substantial inter-rater agreement (Cohen's Kappa = 0.39-0.79) across parameters. LCA derived three classes with different strategies: Class 1 (71.8%) intermediate trunk inclination/knee flexion; Class 2 (24.5%) greater forward trunk inclination, lower knee flexion; Class 3 (3.7%) lower forward trunk inclination, greater knee flexion. Pain duration differed across all classes (p ≤ .001). Time taken to complete forward bends differed between Class 3 and other classes (p = .024).

CONCLUSIONS

Movement strategies can be reliably assessed using the MET. Three strategies for picking lightweight objects off the floor were derived, which differed across pain duration and speed of movement.

Dynamic assessment of spine movement patterns using an RGB-D camera and deep learning

In clinical practice, functional limitations in patients with low back pain are subjectively assessed, potentially leading to misdiagnosis and prolonged pain. This paper proposes an objective deep learning (DL) markerless motion capture system that uses a red-green-blue-depth (RGB-D) camera to measure the kinematics of the spine during flexion-extension (FE) through: 1) the development and validation of a DL semantic segmentation algorithm that segments the back into four anatomical classes and 2) the development and validation of a framework that uses these segmentations to measure spine kinematics during FE. Twenty participants performed ten cycles of FE with drawn-on point markers while being recorded with an RGB-D camera. Five of these participants also performed an additional trial where they were recorded with an optical motion capture (OPT) system. The DL algorithm was trained to segment the back and pelvis into four anatomical classes: upper back, lower back, spine, and pelvis. A kinematic framework was then developed to refine these segmentations into upper spine, lower spine, and pelvis masks, which were used to measure spine kinematics after obtaining 3D global coordinates of the mask corners. The segmentation algorithm achieved high accuracy, and the root mean square error (RMSE) between ground truth and predicted lumbar kinematics was < 4°. When comparing markerless and OPT kinematics, RMSE values were < 6°. This work demonstrates the feasibility of using markerless motion capture to assess FE spine movement in clinical settings. Future work will expand the studied movement directions and test on different demographics.

Investigating concurrent validity of inertial sensors to evaluate multiplanar spine movement

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer a portable and inexpensive alternative to traditional optical motion capture systems, and have potential to support clinical diagnosis and treatment of low back pain; however, due to a lack of confidence regarding the validity of IMU-derived metrics, their uptake and acceptance remain a challenge. The objective of this work was to assess the concurrent validity of the Xsens DOT IMUs for tracking multiplanar spine movement, and to evaluate concurrent validity and reliability for estimating clinically relevant metrics relative to gold-standard optical motion capture equipment. Ten healthy controls performed spine range of motion (ROM) tasks, while data were simultaneously tracked from IMUs and optical marker clusters placed over the C7, T12, and S1 vertebrae. Root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) were calculated to assess validity and reliability of absolute (abs; C7, T12, and S1 sensors) and relative joint (rel; intersegmental thoracic, lumbar, and total) motion. Overall RMSEabs = 1.33°, MAEabs = 0.74° ± 0.69, and ICC2,1,abs = 0.953 across all movements, sensors, and planes. Results were slightly better for uniplanar movements when evaluating the primary rotation axis (prim) absolute ROM (MAEabs,prim = 0.56° ± 0.49; ICC2,1,abs,prim = 0.999). Similarly, when evaluating relative intersegmental motion, overall RMSErel = 2.39°, MAErel = 1.10° ± 0.96, and ICC2,1,rel = 0.950, and relative primary rotation axis achieved MAErel,prim = 0.87° ± 0.77, and ICC2,1,rel,prim = 0.994. Findings from this study suggest that these IMUs can be considered valid for tracking multiplanar spine movement, and may be used to objectively assess spine movement and neuromuscular control in clinics.

A Clinical Measure of Trunk Neuromuscular Function Predicts Falling in Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Older adults with low back pain (LBP) are at risk for falling, but condition-specific mechanisms are unknown. Trunk neuromuscular function is critical for maintaining balance during mobility tasks and is often impaired in older adults with LBP. The purpose of this study was to assess whether aberrant lumbopelvic movements (or aberrant movements), a clinical index of trunk neuromuscular function, were associated with increased fall risk among older adults with chronic LBP over a 12-month follow-up period.

METHODS

This study analyzed data from a prospective cohort study of 250 community-dwelling older adults with chronic LBP. Participants were screened for 4 aberrant movements during 3 trials of forward flexion from a standing position: instability catch, painful arc, altered lumbopelvic rhythm, and Gower's sign. Aberrant movements were totaled to yield a summary score (ie, 0-4). Prospective falls were monitored via monthly fall calendars for 12 months. A generalized linear model with Poisson distribution and log link function was used to evaluate the association between aberrant movements and prospective fall risk. Age, sex, body mass index, LBP intensity, dynamic balance performance, prior falls, anxiolytic medication usage, and hip osteoarthritis characteristics were included as covariates in the model.

RESULTS

Baseline aberrant movements were independently associated with greater fall risk (risk ratio = 1.249, 95% CI = 1.047-1.491, P = .014); each 1-unit increase in aberrant movement score imparted a 24.9% increase in the risk of falling.

CONCLUSIONS

Aberrant movements increased the risk of falling among older adults with chronic LBP over a 1-year span.

Spinal kinematic variability is increased in people with chronic low back pain during a repetitive lifting task

Changes in spinal kinematic variability have been observed in people with chronic non-specific LBP (CNSLBP) during the performance of various repetitive functional tasks. However, the direction of these changes (i.e., less or more kinematic variability) is not consistent. This study aimed to assess differences in kinematic variability of the 3D angular displacement of thoracic and lumbar spinal segments in people with CNSLBP compared to asymptomatic individuals during a repetitive lifting task. Eleven people with CNSLBP and 11 asymptomatic volunteers performed 10 cycles of multi-planar lifting movements while spinal kinematics were recorded. For the three planes of motion, point-by-point standard deviations (SDs) were computed across all cycles of lifting and the average was calculated as a measure of kinematic variability for both segments. People with CNSLBP displayed higher thoracic (F = 8.00, p = 0.010, ηp2 = 0.286) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.48, p = 0.030, ηp2 = 0.215) in the sagittal plane. Moreover, group differences were observed in the transversal plane for thoracic (F = 7.62, p = 0.012, ηp2 = 0.276) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.402, p = 0.031, ηp2 = 0.213), as well as in the frontal plane for thoracic (F = 7.27, p = 0.014, ηp2 = 0.267) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 6.11, p = 0.022, ηp2 = 0.234), all showing higher variability in those with CNSLBP. A significant main effect of group was not detected (p > 0.05) for spinal range of motion (ROM). Thus, people with CNSLBP completed the lifting task with the same ROM in all three planes of motion as observed for asymptomatic individuals, yet they performed the lifting task with higher spinal kinematic cycle-to-cycle variation.

Effects of Sensorimotor Training on Transversus Abdominis Activation in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the effect of sensorimotor training on transversus abdominis activation. (2) Methods: Seventy-five patients with chronic low back pain were randomly assigned to one of three groups (whole body vibration training using Galileo^®, coordination training using Posturomed^®, or physiotherapy (control)). Transversus abdominis activation was measured by using sonography pre- and post-intervention. Second, changes in clinical function tests and their correlation with the sonographic measurements were determined. (3) Results: All three groups showed an improvement in activation of the transversus abdominis post-intervention, with the Galileo^® demonstrating the largest improvement. There were no relevant (r > 0.5) correlations between activation of the transversus abdominis muscle and any clinical tests. (4) Conclusions: The present study provides evidence that sensorimotor training on the Galileo^® significantly improves the activation of the transversus abdominis muscle.

The use of statistical parametric mapping to determine altered movement patterns in people with chronic low back pain

Kinematics studies have generally focused on the quantity of movement using discrete parameters such as maximum and minimum angles to compare between people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and healthy individuals. However, discrete parameters cannot be used to fully describe movement patterns and segmental contributions. This study aimed to explore the use of Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) to characterize quality of movement by examining if differences in movement patterns exist between groups, and within-group segmental contributions, during active movement tests. Twenty-one individuals with CLBP and nine healthy individuals were recruited. Inertial Measurement Unit (IMUs) were attached at thoracic (T3) and lumbar (L1) spine, and pelvis (S1) to collect active trunk flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral bend. SPM was used to analyze between-group movement patterns and within-group segmental contributions. SPM revealed no significant differences (P > 0.05) between groups. However, a greater lumbar contribution (P < 0.001) was observed during 10-40% of flexion followed by a greater pelvic contribution (P < 0.001) during 60-90% of flexion, while a greater lumbar than thoracic contribution (P < 0.001) was observed during flexion and the return to upright position in individuals with CLBP. Individuals with CLBP used a greater thoracic contribution compared to lumbar contribution (P < 0.001) during rotation, while a greater lumbar contribution compared to pelvic contribution was observed (P < 0.001) during lateral bending. Our findings suggest that SPM approach was able to detect differences in thoracic, lumbar, and pelvic velocity contributions and timings between segments in individuals with CLBP. These findings may help improving inter-rater reliability of clinical observations.

Effectiveness of Spinal Stabilization Exercises on Movement Performance in Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain

Introduction

Low back pain (LBP) is a musculoskeletal disorder that affects more than 80% of people in the United States at least once in their lifetime. LBP is one of the most common complaints prompting individuals to seek medical care. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of spinal stabilization exercises (SSEs) on movement performance, pain intensity, and disability level in adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Methods

Forty participants, 20 in each group, with CLBP were recruited and randomly allocated into one of two interventions: SSEs and general exercises (GEs). All participants received their assigned intervention under supervision one to two times per week for the first four weeks and then were asked to continue their program at home for another four weeks. Outcome measures were collected at baseline, two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks, including the Functional Movement ScreenTM (FMSTM), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OSW) scores.

Results

There was a significant interaction for the FMSTM scores (p = 0.016), but not for the NPRS and OSW scores. Post hoc analysis showed significant between-group differences between baseline and four weeks (p = 0.005) and between baseline and eight weeks (p = 0.026) favor SSEs over GEs. Further, the results demonstrated that all participants, regardless of group, had significant improvements in movement performance, pain intensity, and disability level over time.

Conclusion

The results of the study favor SSEs over GEs in improving movement performance for individuals with CLBP, specifically after four weeks of the supervised SSE program.

Neuromuscular Consequences of Lumbopelvic Dysfunction: Research and Clinical Perspectives

Injuries involving the lumbopelvic region (ie, lumbar spine, pelvis, hip) are common across the lifespan and include pathologies such as low back pain, femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, labrum tear, and osteoarthritis. Joint injury is known to result in an arthrogenic muscle response which contributes to muscle weakness and altered movement patterns. The purpose of this manuscript is to summarize the arthrogenic muscle response that occurs across lumbopelvic region pathologies, identify methods to quantify muscle function, and propose suggestions for future research. While each lumbopelvic region pathology is unique, there are a few common impairments and a relative consistent arthrogenic muscle response that occurs across the region. Hip muscle weakness and hip joint range of motion limitations occur with both lumbar spine and hip pathologies, and individuals with low back pain are known to demonstrate inhibition of the transversus abdominis and multifidus. Assessment of muscle inhibition is often limited to research laboratory settings, but dynamometers, ultrasound imaging, and electromyography offer clinical capacity to quantify muscle function and inform treatment pathways. Future studies should systematically determine the arthrogenic muscle response across multiple muscle groups and the timeline for changes in muscle function and determine whether disinhibitory modalities improve functional outcomes beyond traditional treatment approaches.

Derivation of clinical prediction rules for identifying patients with non-acute low back pain who respond best to a lumbar stabilization exercise program at post-treatment and six-month follow-up

Low back pain (LBP) remains one of the most common and incapacitating health conditions worldwide. Clinical guidelines recommend exercise programs after the acute phase, but clinical effects are modest when assessed at a population level. Research needs to determine who is likely to benefit from specific exercise interventions, based on clinical presentation. This study aimed to derive clinical prediction rules (CPRs) for treatment success, using a lumbar stabilization exercise program (LSEP), at the end of treatment and at six-month follow-up. The eight-week LSEP, including clinical sessions and home exercises, was completed by 110 participants with non-acute LBP, with 100 retained at the six-month follow-up. Physical (lumbar segmental instability, motor control impairments, posture and range of motion, trunk muscle endurance and physical performance tests) and psychological (related to fear-avoidance and home-exercise adherence) measures were collected at a baseline clinical exam. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict clinical success, as defined by ≥50% decrease in the Oswestry Disability Index. CPRs were derived for success at program completion (T8) and six-month follow-up (T34), negotiating between predictive ability and clinical usability. The chosen CPRs contained four (T8) and three (T34) clinical tests, all theoretically related to spinal instability, making these CPRs specific to the treatment provided (LSEP). The chosen CPRs provided a positive likelihood ratio of 17.9 (T8) and 8.2 (T34), when two or more tests were positive. When applying these CPRs, the probability of treatment success rose from 49% to 96% at T8 and from 53% to 92% at T34. These results support the further development of these CPRs by proceeding to the validation stage.

Aberrant Lumbopelvic Movements Predict Prospective Functional Decline in Older Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if clinically observable aberrant lumbopelvic movements are associated with physical function at 12-month follow-up in older adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP), both directly and indirectly through baseline physical function.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a yearlong prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Clinical Research Laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling older adults with CLBP (N=250).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Data from 239 participants were analyzed. Participants were screened at baseline for aberrant lumbopelvic movements during active trunk flexion; total observable aberrant movements were recorded and summed (range 0-4). Latent constructs of physical function were developed from an array of perception-based and performance-based outcome measures at baseline and 12 months, respectively. Structural Equation Modeling was used to assess the direct effect of baseline aberrant movement score on the latent construct of 12-month physical function, and its indirect effect through baseline physical function.

RESULTS

Aberrant movements were present in most participants (64.7%) and had a significant negative total effect on 12-month physical function (γ= -0.278, P<.001). Aberrant movement score's direct effect and indirect effect, through baseline functioning, were significantly negatively associated with physical function at 12-months, after adjusting for covariates (γ=-0.068, P=.038; γ= -0.210, P<.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Aberrant lumbopelvic movements are associated with decreased physical function at 12-month follow-up in older adults with CLBP, independent of baseline physical function and covariates. Future studies should evaluate if screening for aberrant movements may inform prognostic and interventional efforts in this patient population.

The inter-rater reliability of clinical observation of prone hip extension and association between aberrant movement and chronic low back pain

BACKGROUND

Clinical observation of aberrant movement patterns during prone hip extension (PHE) is commonly used in clinical practice to identify patients with low back pain. It could be clinically useful to identify individuals with chronic low back pain during remission (CLBP_remission) to provide proactive intervention to prevent exacerbation of low back symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to establish inter-rater reliability of clinical observation of PHE and association between aberrant movement pattern and CLBP_remission.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

METHOD

Twenty-six participants with CLBP_remission and 18 participants without history of low back pain (NoLBP) performed 3 repetitions of active PHE, while 2 examiners concurrently observed and independently rated the movements as "presence" or "absence" of aberrant movement. Kappa statistics were used to establish inter-rater reliability based on rating data from 2 examiners, while chi-square tests were used to determine the association between aberrant movement and CLBP_remission based on ratings (presence and absence) and known groups (CLBP_remission and NoLBP).

RESULTS

Kappa values ranged from fair to moderate (Kappa = 0.36-0.58). Result also demonstrated a significant association (P < 0.05) between presence of aberrant movement and CLBP_remission. Findings indicate fair to moderate inter-rater reliability which are sufficient for clinical practice. The findings also indicated presence of aberrant movement patterns during active PHE was associated with CLBP_remission.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggested the usefulness of clinical observation of aberrant movement pattern during PHE to identify CLBP_remission. The detection of aberrant movement would help clinicians to provide preventive program to minimize the risk of recurrent episodes of low back symptoms.

Concurrent validity of a custom computer vision algorithm for measuring lumbar spine motion from RGB-D camera depth data

Using RGB-D cameras as an alternative motion capture device can be advantageous for biomechanical spine motion assessments of movement quality and dysfunction due to their lower cost and complexity. In this study, we evaluated RGB-D camera performance relative to gold-standard optoelectronic motion capture equipment. Twelve healthy young adults (6M, 6F) were recruited to perform repetitive spine flexion-extension, while wearing infrared reflective marker clusters placed over their T₁₀-T₁₂ spinous processes and sacrum, and motion capture data were recorded simultaneously by both systems. Custom computer vision algorithms were developed to extract spine angles from depth data. Root mean square error (RMSE) was calculated for continuous Euler angles, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC_2,1) were calculated between minimum and maximum angles and range of motion in all movement planes. RMSE was low (RMSE ≤ 2.05°) and reliability was good to excellent (0.849 ≤ ICC_2,1 ≤ 0.979) across all movement planes. In conclusion, the proposed algorithm for tracking 3D lumbar spine motion during a sagittal movement task from one RGB-D camera is reliable in comparison to gold-standard motion tracking equipment. Future research will investigate accuracy and validity in a wider variety of movements, and will also investigate the development of novel methods to measure spine motion without using infrared reflective markers.

Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation with motor control exercise can improve lumbar multifidus activation in individuals with recurrent low back pain

Motor control exercise (MCE) is commonly prescribed for patients with low back pain. Although MCE can improve clinical outcomes, lumbar multifidus muscle (LM) activation remains unchanged. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can be used to re-activate motor units prior to MCE which should result in increased LM activation. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the immediate effects of NMES combined with MCE on LM activation and motor performance. Twenty-five participants without low back pain (NoLBP) and 35 participants with movement control impairment (MCI) were recruited. Participants with MCI were further randomized to combined NMES with MCE (COMB) or sham-NMES with MCE (MCE) group. Ultrasound imaging was used to measure LM thickness at rest, maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), and NMES with MVIC. These data were used to calculate LM activation. Quadruped rocking backward was used to represent motor performance. LM activation and motor performance were measured at baseline and after one-session of intervention. Results showed that both COMB and MCE groups had significantly lower (P < 0.05) LM activation compared with NoLBP group at baseline. Additionally, both COMB and MCE groups demonstrated significant improvement (P < 0.05) in motor performance while COMB group demonstrated significantly greater improvement (P < 0.05) in LM activation compared with MCE group. Individuals with MCI still have persisting LM activation deficit. Our key findings suggest that combined NMES and MCE may have better ability to improve LM activation in individuals with MCI. These findings would support the utility of NMES to induce a priming effect before MCE.

Reliability and Validity of the Functional Movement Screen™ with a Modified Scoring System for Young Adults with Low Back Pain

Background

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common complaints in individuals who seek medical care and is a leading cause of movement impairments. The Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) was developed to evaluate neuromuscular impairments during movement. However, the reliability and validity of the FMS™ have not yet been established for the LBP population because of a limitation of its original scoring system.

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to determine the reliability and validity of the FMS™ with a modified scoring system in young adults with and without LBP. The FMS™ scores were modified by assigning a zero score only when there was an increase in LBP during the FMS™, not simply for the presence of pain, as in the original FMS™ scoring system.

Study Design

Reliability and validity study.

Methods

Twenty-two participants with LBP (8 males and 14 females, 26.7 ± 4.68 years old) and 22 age- and gender-matched participants without LBP (26.64 ± 4.20 years old) completed the study. Each participant performed the FMS™ once while being scored simultaneously and independently by two investigators. In addition, each participant's FMS™ performance was video-recorded and then was scored by another two investigators separately. The video-recorded performance also was scored twice six weeks apart by the same investigator to determine intra-rater reliability.

Results

The results showed excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the FMS™ composite score with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.93 to 0.99 for both groups. In addition, the LBP group scored significantly lower than the group without LBP (p = 0.008).

Conclusions

The results indicate that the FMS™ is able to distinguish between individuals with and without LBP, and that it could be a useful test for clinicians to quantify movement quality and to assess movement restrictions in individuals with LBP.

Levels of Evidence

2b.

Development of an Imaging Evaluation System for Low Back Pain

Purpose

To design a low back pain (LBP) imaging evaluation system for non-professional operators, quantifying risk of LBP in patients and asymptomatic individuals.

Methods

Twenty-one previously asymptomatic subjects and five LBP patients diagnosed by a physician performed a series of test movements under a fixed camera, including hip abduction test, forward bending test, side bending test, double legs lowering test (DLLT), and modified Thomas test. The video clips were analyzed by a system program interface and were classified into a score from 1 to 4. The average total scores of the two groups were compared. Five intact subjects were retested to verify reliability. Twelve intact subjects and three patients’ clips were viewed by an experienced therapist to verify system validity.

Results

The average total scores of two groups were significantly different (p = 0.0004). The results of hip abduction test, forward bending test, side bending test and DLLT showed significant differences between the two groups. The total score of two trials in the retest experiment exhibited a similar result (p = 0.058), with good linear correlation (r = 0.98). The total scores of the evaluations by the experienced therapist and the system program interface agreed with each other (p = 0.141; linear correlation r = 0.90).

Conclusion

The evaluation system showed potential utility in screening LBP risk, with acceptable test–retest reliability and expert validity.

Clinical utility of a cluster of tests as a diagnostic support tool for clinical lumbar instability

BACKGROUND

Numerous clinical tests have been proposed for the diagnosis of clinical lumbar instability (CLI), but a cluster of clinical tests is still needed to increase the accuracy of CLI diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a diagnostic support tool intended to identify the presence of CLI using a cluster of clinical tests.

DESIGN

Analytical cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Two hundred participants with chronic low back pain (LBP) were diagnosed with or without CLI by an orthopedic surgeon. The orthopedic surgeon made the diagnosis from classic clinical symptoms and signs. The diagnosis was used as the reference standard. An orthopedic physical therapist used four clinical tests to identify CLI in each participant, including the apprehension sign, the instability catch sign with/without the abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM), the painful catch sign with/without the ADIM, and the prone instability test.

RESULTS

For an individual test, the apprehension sign showed a high specificity (92.6%) and a positive likelihood ratio (LR+; 2.4) but a very low sensitivity of 17.4%. A cluster of three of the four examined tests provided the most diagnostic accuracy for CLI, with a high LR+ (5.8) and a high specificity (91.7%) but low sensitivity (47.8%) and a negative likelihood ratio (LR-; 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

A cluster of three of the four examined tests was determined to comprise a powerful clinical support tool for the identification of CLI patients as tested against a reference standard diagnosis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Name of the registry: Thai Clinical Trials Registry. Registration number: TCTR20190426002.

The Effect of Exercise Intervention Based Upon the Selective Functional Movement Assessment in an Athlete With Non-specific Low Back Pain: A Case Report and Pilot Study

Objectives

To illustrate the effectiveness of the Selective Functional Movement Assessment (SFMA) as a guide to exercise intervention on chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP).

Methods

A 23-year-old male volleyball athlete with CNLBP was evaluated using the SFMA to assess the degree of physical dysfunctions. And then two-stage exercise protocol was designed based on the results of SFMA. The athlete conducted the exercise intervention for 8 weeks, 1 h each time, three times a week. Transverse abdominal muscles and multifidus muscle thickness, the degree of low back pain, and the degree of physical dysfunctions were measured at pre-intervention, midintervention, and post-intervention.

Results

Based on the results of SFMA, the exercise protocol in the first 4-week session was designed mainly to develop the mobility of ankle, hip, and chest and the stability of lumbar, hip, and knee, in order to improve core strength and gluteal muscle strength. The second 4-week session was an advanced stage with the increase of exercise load on the basis of flexibility and stability; its main purpose was to loosen the hamstring muscles and continue strengthening the core stability and finally help the participant to establish the correct movement pattern and solve the problems of dysfunctions. After 8-week exercise intervention, all movement patterns became functional/non-painful except the deep squat pattern; the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale score decreased from 11 to 2; visual analog scale score decreased from 4 to 2; the thicknesses of the transverse abdominis muscles (right side: 0.2 vs. 0.31 cm, left side: 0.22 vs. 0.33 cm) and multifidus muscles (right side: 2.09 vs. 2.26 cm, left side: 2.15 vs. 2.29 cm) were both increased.

Conclusion

In this case, the SFMA helped to recognize problems related to mobility and stability on the hip joint, thoracic spine, and even areas far away from the lumbar spine in an athlete with CNLBP that were not seen with more conventional examination procedures. The improvements of physical function, the increase in deep core muscles thickness, and the released pain after exercise intervention all verified the effectiveness of SFMA to qualitatively analyze movement patterns at examination and to direct subsequent exercise intervention.

A new approach to the treatment of spinal instability: Fusion or structural reinforcement without surgery?

Spinal instability related low back pain is a common condition resulting from degeneration and loss of stiffness of the intervertebral joint. In order to restore stability, highly invasive surgical fusion is needed for patients who are not responding to conservative treatment. Given the risk and complications of surgery, there has been the urge for improvement with a less invasive solution. Formation of vertebral body osteophytes is a common observation that has been treated as a degenerative condition. However, recent studies have associated it with reduced motion of spinal segments. Unlike the traditional view, we regard it as adaptive reactions aiming to repair and hypothesize that the spinal segments could be stabilized or fused by intentionally induced osteophytes growth at the mobile parts of the intervertebral joint. This could be achieved by injecting Bone Morphogenetic Proteins to the anterior ends of the vertebral bodies and/or the facet joints on both sides of two consecutive vertebrae percutaneously. If verified, it would be the first time that fusion could be achieved without surgery. Hence it would provide a valuable alternative to current treatments of spinal instability. Preliminary test in favor of this hypothesis is presented and we recommend that a formal study with sufficient number of samples is needed for verification.

Effect of increased relative stiffness of the lumbar spine on hamstring muscle stretching in individuals with a history of low back pain suspected to have a clinical lumbar instability: A randomized crossover design

BACKGROUND

Theoretically, lumbopelvic stabilization techniques during hamstring muscle stretching could increase lumbar stiffness relative to hamstring muscle in individuals with a history of low back pain and suspected clinical lumbar instability. However, evidence to support this theory is limited. This study aimed to 1) determine changes in lumbopelvic, lumbar, and hip motions, and hamstring muscle length after stretching exercises with lumbopelvic stiffening or relaxing techniques, and 2) compare those changes between techniques.

METHODS

This study used a randomized crossover design. Thirty-two participants with a history of low back pain and bilateral hamstring muscle tightness were recruited. The order of the first technique was randomly assigned. After a 2-day washout, participants were crossed over to the second technique. Motion data during active forward trunk bending and bilateral hamstring muscle length during passive knee extension were collected pre- and post-intervention.

FINDINGS

Significant increases (P < 0.05) were found in bilateral hamstring muscle length for both techniques. However, stiffening technique demonstrated a significant decrease in lumbar motion (P < 0.05) and increase in hip motion (P < 0.05), while relaxing technique demonstrated trends showing increases in lumbar and hip motions (P = 0.134 and 0.115, respectively). The findings showed significantly greater improvement (P < 0.05) in lumbar and hip motions with stiffening technique.

INTERPRETATION

The findings suggest increased relative stiffness of the lumbar spine during hamstring muscle stretching can specifically lengthen bilateral hamstring muscle and decrease excessive lumbar motion. This stiffening technique may prevent excessive movement of the lumbar spine, thereby reducing the risk of recurrent low back pain.

Individuals with low back pain improve in standing tolerance and sagittal plane muscle activation following exercise intervention

BACKGROUND

Healthy individuals who develop low back pain (LBP) during standing (standing intolerant) respond favorably to stabilization-based exercise interventions. People with clinical LBP meeting clinical prediction rules for stabilization-based exercise share characteristics with standing intolerant individuals.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of stabilization-based exercise on standing tolerance, muscle activation and clinical measures in individuals with LBP meeting clinical prediction rules for stabilization-based exercise.

METHODS

Participants with and without LBP completed testing pre- and post-6 weeks of progressive home exercise intervention. Testing included clinical examination and electromyography during sagittal and frontal plane movements. LBP was also assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) during standing. Outcomes included clinical findings, muscle sequencing, and VAS in standing.

RESULTS

The LBP group had non-significant decreases in Oswestry Disability Index (-2.1%, p= 0.22), baseline VAS (-7.1 mm, p= 0.11), lumbopelvic reversal (p= 0.06) and positive active hip abduction test (p= 0.06). Significant improvements were seen in standing VAS (-5.6 mm, p< 0.001). The LBP group had beneficial changes in activation strategies in standing flexion (p< 0.05) following intervention, with no changes during frontal plane movement strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with LBP meeting clinical prediction rules for stabilization-based exercise demonstrated increased standing tolerance and sagittal plane muscle sequencing following a 6-week intervention.

Lumbar muscle stiffness is different in individuals with low back pain than asymptomatic controls and is associated with pain and disability, but not common physical examination findings

BACKGROUND

Lumbar muscle dysfunction is commonly implicated in low back pain (LBP). Shear-wave elastography (SWE) uses ultrasound technology to quantify absolute soft tissue stiffness (shear modulus), thereby allowing for estimation of individual muscle contraction and function.

OBJECTIVES

To compare resting and contracted stiffness of lumbar spine musculature in individuals with and without LBP using SWE. A secondary aim was to explore for relationships between common self-report and physical examination measures and resting and contracted muscle stiffness in individuals with LBP.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

METHODS

Shear modulus of the lumbar musculature was measured in 60 participants with LBP and 60 asymptomatic controls (120 total) using SWE. The lumbar erector spinae were imaged at rest only, while the lumbar multifidus was imaged at rest and during contraction. Before imaging, participants with LBP underwent a standardized clinical examination including a brief history, self-report questionnaires, and a physical examination. Lumbar muscle shear modulus was compared between participants with LBP and asymptomatic controls using ANCOVA. Potential associations between shear modulus and selected self-report and physical examination measures were assessed using correlation analysis.

RESULTS

Stiffness of the erector spinae and lumbar multifidus at rest (but not during contraction) was greater in participants with LBP than in asymptomatic controls (p < 0.05). Many of the self-report measures, but none of the physical examination findings were associated with muscle stiffness.

CONCLUSION

Resting lumbar muscle stiffness is greater in individuals with LBP than asymptomatic controls and is associated with self-reported pain and disability, but not physical exam findings.

Association between lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation in patients with non-specific low back pain during forward bending task: A cross-sectional study

Background

Evidence suggests patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) have altered lumbar and pelvic movement patterns. These changes could be associated with altered patterns of muscle activation.

Objective

The study aimed to determine: (1) differences in the relative contributions and velocity of lumbar and pelvic movements between people with and without NSLBP, (2) the differences in lumbopelvic muscle activation patterns between people with and without NSLBP, and (3) the association between lumbar and pelvic movements and lumbopelvic muscle activation patterns.

Methods

Subjects (8 healthy individuals and 8 patients with NSLBP) performed 2 sets of 3 repetitions of active forward bending, while motion and muscle activity data were collected simultaneously. Data derived were lumbar and pelvic ranges of motion and velocity, and ipsilateral and contralateral lumbopelvic muscle activities (internal oblique/transverse abdominis (IO/TA), lumbar multifidus (LM), erector spinae (ES) and gluteus maximus (GM) muscles).

Results

Lumbar and pelvic motions showed trends, but exceeded 95% confidence minimal detectable difference ( MDD 95 ) , for greater pelvic motion ( p = 0 . 06 ) , less lumbar motion ( p = 0 . 23 ) among patients with NSLBP. Significantly less activity was observed in the GM muscles bilaterally ( p < 0 . 05 ) in the NSLBP group. A significant association ( r = - 0 . 8 , p = 0 . 02 ) was found between ipsilateral ES muscle activity and lumbar motion, while moderate, but statistically non-significant associations, were found between GM muscle activity bilaterally and lumbar velocity ( ipsilateral: r = - 0 . 6 , p = 0 . 14 ; contralateral: r = - 0 . 6 , p = 0 . 16 ) in the NSLBP group.

Conclusion

Findings indicated patients had greater pelvic contribution, but less lumbar contribution which was associated with less activation of the GM bilaterally.

Concurrent validity of a wearable IMU for objective assessments of functional movement quality and control of the lumbar spine

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are being recognized in clinical and rehabilitation settings for their ability to assess movement-related disorders of the spine for better guidance of treatment-planning and tracking of recovery. This study evaluated the Mbientlab MetaMotionR IMUs, relative to Vicon motion capture equipment in measuring local dynamic stability of the spine (quantified using maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponent; λ_max), lumbopelvic coordination (quantified using mean absolute relative phase; MARP), and intersegmental motor variability (quantified using deviation phase; DP) of lumbopelvic segments in 10 participants during 35 cycles of repetitive spine flexion-extension (FE). Intraclass correlations were strong between systems when using both the FE angle time-series and the sum of squares (SS) time-series to measure local dynamic stability (0.807 ≤ICC_2,1^λmax,FE ≤ 0.919; 0.738 ≤ ICC_2,1^λmax,SS ≤ 0.868), sagittal-plane lumbopelvic coordination (0.961 ≤ICC_2,1^MARP ≤ 0.963), and sagittal-plane lumbopelvic variability (0.961 ≤ICC_2,1^DP ≤ 0.963). It was concluded that the MetaMotionR IMUs can be reliably used for measuring features associated with spine movement quality and motor control during a repetitive FE task. Future work will assess the reliability of sensor placement, performance during multi-directional movements, and ability to discern clinical and healthy populations based on assessment of movement quality and control.

Movement Control Impairment and Low Back Pain: State of the Art of Diagnostic Framing

Background and objectives: Low back pain is one of the most common health problems. In 85% of cases, it is not possible to identify a specific cause, and it is therefore called Non-Specific Low Back Pain (NSLBP). Among the various attempted classifications, the subgroup of patients with impairment of motor control of the lower back (MCI) is between the most studied. The objective of this systematic review is to summarize the results from trials about validity and reliability of clinical tests aimed to identify MCI in the NSLBP population. Materials and Methods: The MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and MedNar databases have been searched until May 2018. The criteria for inclusion were clinical trials about evaluation methods that are affordable and applicable in a usual clinical setting and conducted on populations aged > 18 years. A single author summarized data in synoptic tables relating to the clinical property; a second reviewer intervened in case of doubts about the relevance of the studies. Results: 13 primary studies met the inclusion criteria: 10 investigated inter-rater reliability, 4 investigated intra-rater reliability, and 6 investigated validity for a total of 23 tests (including one cluster of tests). Inter-rater reliability is widely studied, and there are tests with good, consistent, and substantial values (waiter's bow, prone hip extension, sitting knee extension, and one leg stance). Intra-rater reliability has been less investigated, and no test have been studied for more than one author. The results of the few studies about validity aim to discriminate only the presence or absence of LBP in the samples. Conclusions: At the state of the art, results related to reliability support the clinical use of the identified tests. No conclusions can be drawn about validity.

Clinical spinal instability: 10 years since the derivation of a clinical prediction rule. A narrative literature review

BACKGROUND

Between 2005 and 2015 significant changes in the clinical decision making paradigm for the treatment of spinal instability occurred. This was largely motivated by a clinical prediction rule (CPR) derivation study that was developed to specifically identify patients with low back pain who are more likely to respond positively to lumbar stabilization exercises.

OBJECTIVE

This is a narrative literature review on the recent advances physiotherapy has made in the treatment of clinical spinal instability.

METHODS

Literature discussing the conservative treatment of lumbar spinal instability published from 2005-2015 was identified with electronic searches of PubMed (MEDLINE) Advanced search, Web of Science, BIOSIS Previews, MEDLINE (EBSCO), SportDISCUS (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), PEDro, Scopus and Cochrane and reviewed.

RESULTS

Five systematic reviews, 2 with meta-analyses, and 1 systematic review on the quality of systematic reviews were found. There seems to be some benefit from specific stabilization exercise programs in regards to pain reduction, but they might not be more effective than other forms of exercise. The currently existing CPR for stabilization exercises is not far enough developed to use in clinical practice and is not validated as of yet.

CONCLUSION

Stabilization exercises seem to decrease chronic low back pain, although it is not clear that this pain has to be caused by clinical spinal instability. Caution should be exercised when using CPRs in the clinic; they are not meant to be strict treatment guidelines, but rather a tool that helps facilitate clinical decision-making.

The use of motor learning and neural plasticity in rehabilitation for ataxic hemiparesis: A case report

Background and Purpose: Although the principles of neural plasticity for stroke rehabilitation are well established, specific intervention plans for patients with ataxia following a lacunar infarct are not well described. The purpose of this case report is to describe the intervention program for a patient with ataxic hemiparesis based on principles of motor learning and neural plasticity. Case Description: An 83-year-old, socially active male presented to the emergency department with right-sided upper extremity weakness and ataxia. The patient's acute hospital course included 4 days in a stoke unit, followed by 13 days in inpatient rehabilitation. Intervention: A 3-phase graded mobility and coordination plan was used during inpatient rehabilitation. Interventions included function-based training with repeated ambulation, coordination activities for the upper and lower extremities, and strengthening to help the patient achieve his goal of walking "without gait deviations." The concepts of motor learning and neural plasticity were utilized for timing and feedback on patient errors when implementing this novel program. Outcomes: The patient's level of assistance for mobility and activities of daily living improved from minimal assistance to modified independence without use of an assistive device. The Dynamic Gait Index score improved from 16/24 to 20/24 suggesting a decreased fall risk. Discussion: This case report describes a novel intervention strategy for a patient with ataxia following a lacunar stroke. The application of the principles of neural plasticity and motor learning was the foundation for a function-based plan of care.

Coordination of the rotational movement of the pelvis and the hip in men without low back pain, with control impairment of the lumbopelvic region in the sagittal plane

Purpose To assess the presence of control impairment (CI) of the lumbopelvic region in the axial plane in men without low back pain (LBP) with CI in the sagittal plane. Methods : Twenty-four males, between 18 and 23 of age, BMI = normal, who did not report episodes of LBP in the 12 months prior to the study, were studied. Assessment of the sagittal control of the lumbopelvic region was performed during stand to sit. Nine participants demonstrated CI in sagittal plane and 15 did not. An active hip lateral rotation (HLR) test was performed, in which lumbopelvic rotation during HLR was assessed using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. Results : Patients with CI in sagittal plane had a greater percentage of their total lumbopelvic pelvic rotation at 60% of HLR range compared to those without CI (p < 0.05; d = 0.93). No significant differences in the total lumbopelvic and HLR range of motion were found between the groups. Conclusion : Men without LBP who experience CI of the lumbopelvic region in the sagittal plane also show CI in the axial plane. The control deficiencies were not related to the total range of lumbopelvic or HLR range of motion.

Directional preference constructs for patients' low back pain in the absence of centralization

Objectives: A detailed description of how Directional Preference (DP) constructs are measured could accelerate research to practice translation and improve research findings for Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) stakeholders. A secondary analysis of a prospective, observational cohort study was conducted to understand (1) the type and prevalence of DP constructs at first examination and (2) the relationships between DP constructs and clinical outcomes at follow-up. Methods: Data were collected and analyzed from 1485 consecutive patients who presented to outpatient, private practice clinics with primary complaints of non-specific low back pain (LBP); 400 patients met the inclusion criteria and completed first examination and follow-up data. Statistical analysis determined prevalence and the relationships between DP constructs at first examination and clinical outcomes at follow-up. Results: The primary findings in this investigation were that (1) the most prevalent DP constructs at first examination were related to range of motion (ROM) and pain intensity (Patient Reported Improvement in ROM (74.8%), Increase in Spine ROM (29.5%), and Pain Intensity Change (17.3%)), (2) all groups improved and made clinically meaningful improvements in disability and pain intensity at follow-up, (3) no clinically significant differences in disability or pain intensity were found between the groups at follow-up, and (4) 26.5% and 6.5% of patients exhibited a relative increase in lumbar spine extension and flexion ROM, respectively, post repeated movement testing on the first examination. Discussion: The findings in this study assist providers in making assessment and treatment decisions with their patients by offering insight regarding the most prevalent DP constructs typically found at the first examination and their subsequent association with outcome when Centralization (CEN) does not occur. Recommendations for researchers have been made to further explore the DP framework used in this study.

Kinematic characterization of clinically observed aberrant movement patterns in patients with non-specific low back pain: a cross-sectional study

Background

Clinical observation of aberrant movement patterns during active forward bending is one criterion used to identify patients with non-specific low back pain suspected to have movement coordination impairment. The purpose of this study was to describe and quantify kinematic patterns of the pelvis and trunk using a dynamics systems approach, and determine agreement between clinical observation and kinematic classification.

Method

Ninety-eight subjects performed repeated forward bending with clinical observation and kinematic data simultaneously collected. Kinematic data were plotted using angle-angle, coupling-angle, and phase-plane diagrams. Accuracy statistics in conjunction with receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine agreement between clinical observation and kinematic patterns.

Results

Kinematic patterns were consistent with clinical observation and definitions of typical and aberrant movement patterns with moderate agreement (kappa = 0.46–0.50; PABAK = 0.49–0.73). Early pelvic motion dominance in lumbopelvic coupling-angle diagram ≥59° within the first 38% of the movement represent observed altered lumbopelvic rhythm. Frequent disruptions in lumbar spine velocity represented by phase-plane diagrams with local minimum occurrences ≥6 and sudden decoupling in lumbopelvic coupling-angle diagrams with sum of local minimum and maximum occurrences ≥15 represent observed judder.

Conclusion

These findings further define observations of movement coordination between the pelvis and lumbar spine for the presence of altered lumbopelvic rhythm and judder. Movement quality of the lumbar spine segment is key to identifying judder. This information will help clinicians better understand and identify aberrant movement patterns in patients with non-specific low back pain.

How clinicians analyze movement quality in patients with non-specific low back pain: a cross-sectional survey study with Dutch allied health care professionals

Background

Observation of movement quality (MQ) is an indelible element in the process of clinical reasoning for patients with non-specific low back pain (NS-LBP). However, the observation and evaluation of MQ in common daily activities are not standardized within allied health care. This study aims to describe how Dutch allied health care professionals (AHCPs) observe and assess MQ in patients with NS-LBP and whether AHCPs feel the need to have a specific outcome measure for assessing MQ in patients with NS-LBP.

Methods

In this cross-sectional digital survey study, Dutch primary care AHCPs (n = 114) answered one open and three closed questions about MQ in NS-LBP management. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were applied.

Results

Qualitative analyses of the answers to the open questions revealed four main themes: 1) movement pattern features, 2) motor control features, 3) environmental influences and 4) non-verbal expressions of pain and exertion. Quantitative analyses clearly indicated that AHCPs observe MQ in the diagnostic (92%), therapeutic (91%) and evaluation phases (86%), that they do not apply any objective measurement of MQ and that 63% of the AHCPs consider it important to have a specific outcome measure to assess MQ. The AHCPs expressed added benefits and critical notes regarding clinical reasoning and quality of care.

Conclusion

AHCPs recognize the importance of observing MQ in the assessment and management of LBP in a standardized way. However, there is no consensus amongst AHCPs how MQ should be standardized. Prior to standardization, it will be important to develop a theoretical framework to determine which observable and measurable dimensions of MQ are most valid and relevant for patients with NS-LBP to include in the assessment.

Inter- and Intrarater Reliability of Clinical Tests Associated With Functional Lumbar Segmental Instability and Motor Control Impairment in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To provide a comprehensive overview of clinical tests associated with functional lumbar segmental instability and motor control impairment in patients with low back pain (LBP), and to investigate their intrarater reliability, interrater reliability, or both.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic computerized search was conducted on December 1, 2015, in 4 different databases (starting search year is indicated in parentheses, with articles included from that year until December 1, 2015): PubMed (1972-), Web of Science (1955-), Embase (1947-), and MEDLINE (1946-).

STUDY SELECTION

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed during design, search, and reporting stages of this review. The included population comprised patients with primary LBP.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted as follows: (1) description and scoring of the clinical tests; (2) population characteristics; (3) inclusion and exclusion criteria; (4) description of the used procedures; (5) results for both intra- and interrater reliability; and eventually (6) notification on used statistical method. The risk of bias of the included articles was assessed with the use of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 16 records were eligible, and 30 clinical tests were identified. All included studies investigated interrater reliability, and 3 studies investigated intrarater reliability. The identified interrater reliability scores ranged from poor to very good (κ=-.09 to .89; intraclass correlation coefficient, .72-.96), and the intrarater reliability scores ranged from fair to very good (κ=.51-.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Three clinical tests (aberrant movement pattern, prone instability test, Beighton Scale) could be identified as having an adequate interrater reliability. No conclusions could be made for intrarater reliability. However, further research should focus on better study designs, provide an overall agreement for uniformity and interpretation of clinical tests, and should implement research regarding validity.

Lumbar Thrust Manipulation and Exercise for the Treatment of Mechanical Low Back Pain in Adolescents: A Case Series

Study Design Case series. Background Low back pain (LBP) is an increasing problem in health care. The evidence for the use of spinal manipulative therapy to treat pediatric patients with LBP is minimal. The treatment of pediatrics with manual therapy, particularly spinal manipulation, is controversial within the medical community, primarily with respect to adverse events. The purpose of this case series was to illustrate the feasibility and safety of lumbar manipulation plus exercise in the adolescent population with mechanical LBP. Case Description Three patients-a 13-year-old adolescent girl, 15-year-old adolescent girl, and 13-year-old adolescent boy-were treated in an outpatient physical therapy setting for mechanical LBP. All 3 patients were assessed using a lumbar manipulation clinical prediction rule and treated with sidelying lumbar manipulation and exercise. Outcomes Patients were treated for a total of 10 to 14 visits over a course of 8 to 9 weeks. Pain (measured by a numeric pain-rating scale) and disability (measured by the modified Oswestry Disability Index) improved to 0/10 and 0%, respectively, in each patient. No adverse reactions to manipulation were reported. Discussion The results of this case series describe the use of lumbar thrust manipulation and exercise for the treatment of mechanical LBP in adolescents. The positive results indicate that lumbar manipulation may be a safe adjunct therapy. Further studies, including randomized controlled trials, are needed to determine effectiveness. Level of Evidence Therapy, level 4. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(5):391-398. Epub 6 Apr 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6366.

Trunk motor control deficits in acute and subacute low back pain are not associated with pain or fear of movement

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

A subgroup of patients with acute to subacute low back pain (LBP) presenting with trunk movement control deficits, pain provocation with segmental testing, and segmental hypermobility have been clinically identified as having movement coordination impairments (MCIs) of the trunk. It is hypothesized that these patients have proprioceptive, postural, and movement control impairments of the trunk associated with LBP. Although trunk control impairments have been identified in patients with chronic LBP, they have not been investigated in this subgroup or closer to symptom onset.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to identify trunk motor control (postural control and movement precision) impairments in a subgroup of patients with acute to subacute LBP who have been clinically identified to have MCIs and determine association of these impairments with pain and fear of movement.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

The study design includes observational design, university biomechanics laboratory, and clinical practice.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Thirty-three patients with acute to subacute LBP presenting with trunk MCIs and 33 healthy controls matched with gender, age, and body mass index were identified.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-report measures included Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire, and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and physiologic measures included postural control and movement precision.

METHODS

Center-of-pressure movement was measured while subjects attempted to volitionally control trunk posture and movement while sitting on a platform with a hemisphere mounted underneath. This created an unstable surface that required coordinated trunk control to maintain an upright seated posture. Postural control was tested using eyes-open and -closed balance protocols. Movement precision was tested with a dynamic control test requiring movement of the center of pressure along a discrete path. Group trunk motor control performance was compared with analysis of variance and t test. Performance association with pain and fear of movement were assessed with Pearson correlations.

RESULTS

Patients' postural control in the eyes-closed condition (p=.02) and movement precision (p=.04) were significantly impaired compared with healthy controls, with moderate-to-large group difference effect sizes. These trunk motor control impairments were not significantly associated with the patients self-reported pain characteristics and fear of movement.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with clinical identification of trunk MCIs demonstrated decreased trunk motor control, suggesting that impairments in proprioception, motor output, or central processing occur early in the back pain episode. This information may help to guide interventions to address these specific limitations, improving delivery of care.

Baseline Examination Factors Associated With Clinical Improvement After Dry Needling in Individuals With Low Back Pain

STUDY DESIGN

Quasi-experimental.

OBJECTIVES

To explore for associations between demographic, patient history, and physical examination variables and short-term improvement in self-reported disability following dry needling therapy performed on individuals with low back pain (LBP).

BACKGROUND

Dry needling is an intervention used with increasing frequency in patients with LBP; however, the characteristics of patients who are most likely to respond are not known.

METHODS

Seventy-two volunteers with mechanical LBP participated in the study. Potential prognostic factors were collected from baseline questionnaires, patient history, and physical examination tests. Treatment consisted of dry needling to the lumbar multifidus muscles bilaterally, administered during a single treatment session. Improvement was based on percent change on the Oswestry Disability Index at 1 week. The univariate and multivariate associations between 33 potential prognostic factors and improved disability were assessed with correlation coefficients and multivariate linear regression.

RESULTS

Increased LBP with the multifidus lift test (rpb = 0.31, P = .01) or during passive hip flexion performed with the patient supine (rpb = 0.23, P = .06), as well as positive beliefs about acupuncture/dry needling (rho = 0.22, P = .07), demonstrated univariate associations with Oswestry Disability Index improvement. Aggravation of LBP with standing (rpb = -0.27, P = .03), presence of leg pain (rpb = -0.29, P = .02), and any perception of hypermobility in the lumbar spine (rpb = -0.21, P = .09) were associated with less improvement. The multivariate model identified 2 predictors of improved disability with dry needling: pain with the multifidus lift test and no aggravation with standing (R(2) = 0.16, P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Increased LBP with the multifidus lift test was the strongest predictor of improved disability after dry needling, suggesting that the finding of pain during muscle contraction should be studied in future dry needling studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognosis, level 1b.

An exploratory examination of the association between altered lumbar motor control, joint mobility and low back pain in athletes

Background:

Low back pain (LBP) is a common cause of lost playing time and can be a challenging clinical condition in competitive athletes. LBP in athletes may be associated with joint and ligamentous hypermobility and impairments in activation and coordination of the trunk musculature, however there is limited research in this area.

Objectives:

To determine if there is an association between altered lumbar motor control, joint mobility and low back pain (LBP) in a sample of athletes.

Materials and Methods:

Fifteen athletes with LBP were matched by age, gender and body mass index (BMI) with controls without LBP. Athletes completed a questionnaire with questions pertaining to demographics, activity level, medical history, need to self-manipulate their spine, pain intensity and location. Flexibility and lumbar motor control were assessed using: active and passive straight leg raise, lumbar range of motion (ROM), hip internal rotation ROM (HIR), Beighton ligamentous laxity scale, prone instability test (PIT), observation of lumbar aberrant movements, double leg lowering and Trendelenburg tests. Descriptive statistics were compiled and the chi square test was used to analyze results.

Results:

Descriptive statistics showed that 40% of athletes with LBP exhibited aberrant movements (AM), compared to 6% without LBP. 66% of athletes with LBP reported frequently self-manipulating their spine compared to 40% without LBP. No significant differences in motor control tests were found between groups. Athletes with LBP tended to have less lumbar flexion (63 ± 11°) compared to those without LBP (66 ± 13°). Chi-Square tests revealed that the AM were more likely to be present in athletes with LBP than those without (X2 = 4.66, P = 0.03).

Conclusions:

The presence of aberrant movement patterns is a significant clinical finding and associated with LBP in athletes.