Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI with a Histopathology Gold Standard in the Detection, Intraprostatic Localization, and Determination of Local Extension of Primary Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Single-Center Imaging Trial

Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Grade Group Prediction in Prostate Cancer: A Radiomics Pilot Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To determine the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI-radiomics in predicting the International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (ISUP-GG) in therapy-naïve prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this ethics review board-approved retrospective study on two prospective clinical trials between 2017 and 2020, 73 men with suspected/confirmed PCa were included. All participants underwent multiparametric MRI. On MRI, dominant lesions (per PI-RADS) were identified. DCE-MRI radiomic features were extracted from the segmented volumes following the image biomarker standardisation initiative (IBSI) guidelines through 14 time points. Histopathology evaluation on the cognitive-fusion targeted biopsies was set as the reference standard. Univariate regression was done to evaluate potential predictors across all calculated features. Random forest imputation was used for multivariate modelling.

RESULTS

73 index lesions were reviewed. Histopathology revealed 28, 16, 13 and 16 lesions with ISUP-GG-Negative/1/2, ISUP-GG-3, ISUP-GG-4 and ISUP-GG-5, respectively. From the extracted features, total lesion enhancement (TLE), minimum enhancement intensity and Grey-Level Run Length Matrix (GLRLM) were the most significantly different parameters among ISUP-GGs (Neg/1/2 vs 3/4 vs 5). 16 features with significant cross-sectional associations with ISUP-GGs entered the multivariate analysis. The final DCE partitioning model used only four features (lesion sphericity, TLE, GLRLM and Grey-Level Zone Length Matrix). For the binarized diagnosis (ISUP-GG≤2 vs ISUP-GG>2), the accuracy reached 81%.

CONCLUSION

DCE-MRI radiomics might be used as a non-invasive tool for aiding pathological grade group prediction in therapy-naïve PCa patients, potentially adding complementary information to PI-RADS for supporting tailored diagnostic pathways and treatment planning.

Imaging and therapy in prostate cancer using prostate specific membrane antigen radioligands

Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) directed PET imaging has rapidly transformed prostate cancer workup over the past decade and paved the way for a theranostic approach using 177Lu-labelled PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT). This review gives an overview of the underlying principles behind PSMA as a target; the current use of PSMA PET in prostate cancer imaging and benefits compared to conventional imaging; and therapeutic applications including optimisation of patient selection. It also explores the evidence base of PSMA PET for other indications not in routine clinical use and the future of PSMA-directed RLT.

Comparison of Multiparametric MRI and the Combination of PSMA Plus MRI for the Intraprostatic Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and the combination of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET plus MRI (PSMA + MRI) for detecting intraprostatic clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Relevant databases were searched through November 2023. Only studies directly comparing mpMRI and PSMA + MRI (PET/MRI or PET/CT + mpMRI) were included. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for each approach.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies were included. On a patient-level analysis, PSMA + MRI had higher sensitivity (9 studies) than mpMRI for csPCa detection (96% [95% confidence interval (CI): 92%, 98%] vs 89% [95% CI: 81%, 94%]; P = 0.04). The patient-level specificity (4 studies) of PSMA + MRI was 55% (95% CI: 31%-76%) compared with 50% (95% CI: 44%-57%) of mpMRI ( P = 0.67). Region-level sensitivity (10 studies) was 85% (95% CI: 74%-92%) for PSMA + MRI and 71% (95% CI: 58%-82%) for mpMRI ( P = 0.09), whereas specificity (4 studies) was 87% (95% CI: 76%-94%) and 90% (95% CI: 82%-95%), respectively ( P = 0.59). Lesion-level sensitivity and specificity were similar between modalities with pooled data from less than 4 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

PSMA + MRI had superior pooled sensitivity and similar specificity for the detection of csPCa compared with mpMRI in this meta-analysis of head-to-head studies.

Martin B, Jacobsen NE, Evans H, Gao Y, Hung R, Abele J, Dromparis P, Lima JF, Bismar T, Michelakis E, Sutendra G, Wuest F, Tu W, Adam BA, Fung C, Tamm A, Kinnaird A. Fluorine-18 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-1007 PET/CT vs Multiparametric MRI for Locoregional Staging of Prostate Cancer

Importance

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) demonstrates overexpression in prostate cancer and correlates with tumor aggressiveness. PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) is superior to conventional imaging for the metastatic staging of prostate cancer per current research but studies of second-generation PSMA PET radioligands for locoregional staging are limited.

Objective

To determine the accuracy of fluorine-18 PSMA-1007 PET/computed tomography (18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT) compared to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the primary locoregional staging of intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancers.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Next Generation Trial was a phase 2 prospective validating paired cohort study assessing the accuracy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI for locoregional staging of prostate cancer, with results of histopathologic examination as the reference standard comparator. Radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and pathologists were blinded to preoperative clinical, pathology, and imaging data. Patients underwent all imaging studies and radical prostatectomies at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Alberta, Canada. Eligible participants included men with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer who consented to radical prostatectomy. Participants who underwent radical prostatectomy were included in the final analysis. Patients were recruited between March 2022 and June 2023, and data analysis occurred between July 2023 and December 2023.

Exposures

All participants underwent both 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI within 2 weeks of one another and before radical prostatectomy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the correct identification of the prostate cancer tumor stage by each imaging test. The secondary outcomes were correct identification of the dominant nodule, laterality, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesical invasion.

Results

Of 150 eligible men with prostate cancer, 134 patients ultimately underwent radical prostatectomy (mean [SD] age at prostatectomy, 62.0 [5.7] years). PSMA PET was superior to MRI for the accurate identification of the final pathological tumor stage (61 [45%] vs 38 [28%]; P = .003). PSMA PET was also superior to MRI for the correct identification of the dominant nodule (126 [94%] vs 112 [83%]; P = .01), laterality (86 [64%] vs 60 [44%]; P = .001), and extracapsular extension (100 [75%] vs 84 [63%]; P = .01), but not for seminal vesicle invasion (122 [91%] vs 115 [85%]; P = .07).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this phase 2 prospective validating paired cohort study, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT was superior to MRI for the locoregional staging of prostate cancer. These findings support PSMA PET in the preoperative workflow of intermediate-risk and high-risk tumors.

The Sensitivity and Specificity of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Predicting Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Background/Objectives: The presence of seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) in prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with poorer postoperative outcomes. This study evaluates the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) for SVI in PCa. Methods: This cohort study included consecutive robotic prostatectomy patients for PCa at three Australian tertiary referral centres between April 2016 and September 2022. MRI and PSMA PET/CT results, clinicopathological variables, including age, BMI, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, DRE, Biopsy Gleason score, Positive biopsy cores, PIRADS v2.1 score, MRI volume and MRI lesion size were extracted. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI and PSMA PET/CT for predicting SVI were compared with the histopathological results by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Subgroup univariate and multivariate analysis was performed. Results: Of the 528 patients identified, 86 had SVI on final pathology. MRI had a low sensitivity of 0.162 (95% CI: 0.088-0.261) and a high specificity of 0.963 (95% CI: 0.940-0.979). The PSMA PET/CT had a low sensitivity of 0.439 (95% CI: 0.294-0591) and a high specificity of 0.933 (95% CI: 0.849-0.969). When MRI and PSMA PET/CT were used in combination, the sensitivity and specificity improved to 0.514 (95%CI: 0.356-0.670) and 0.880 (95% CI: 0.813-0.931). The multivariate regression showed a higher biopsy Gleason score (p = 0.033), higher PSA (p < 0.001), older age (p = 0.001), and right base lesions (p = 0.003) to be predictors of SVI. Conclusions: MRI and PSMA PET/CT independently underpredicted SVI. The sensitivity and AUC improved when they were used in combination. Multiple clinicopathological factors were associated with SVI on multivariate regression and predictive models incorporating this information may improve oncological outcomes.

Intraoperative technologies to assess margin status during radical prostatectomy - a narrative review

Positive surgical margin (PSM) is a frequent concern for surgeons performing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa). PSM are recognized as risk factors for earlier biochemical recurrence and expose patients to adjuvant or salvage treatments such as external radiotherapy and hormonotherapy. Several strategies have been established to reduce PSM rate, while still allowing safe nerve-sparing surgery. Precise preoperative staging by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and fusion biopsy is recommended to identify suspicious areas of extracapsular extension (ECE) that warrant special attention during dissection. However, even with optimal imaging, ECE can be missed, some cancers are not well defined or visible, and capsular incision during surgery remains an issue. Hence, intraoperative frozen section techniques, such as the neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen section examination (NeuroSAFE) have been developed and lately widely disseminated. The NeuroSAFE technique reduces PSM rate while allowing higher rate of nerve-sparing surgery. However, its use is limited to high volume or expert center because of its high barrier-to-entry in terms of logistics, human resources and expertise, as well as cost. Also, NeuroSAFE is a time-consuming process, even in expert hands. To address these issues, several technologies have been developed for an ex vivo and in vivo use. Ex vivo technology such as fluorescent confocal microscopy and intraoperative PET-CT require the extraction of the specimen for preparation, and digital images acquisition. In vivo technology, such as augmented reality based on mpMRI images and PSMA-fluorescent guided surgery have the advantage to provide an intracorporeal analysis of the completeness of the resection. The current manuscript provides a narrative review of established techniques, and details several new and promising techniques for intraoperative PSM assessment.

Diagnostic Performance of [18F]AlF-Thretide PET/CT in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Using Histopathology as Reference Standard

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: In total, 49 patients with biopsy-proven PCa were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT, and the scoring system of the PRIMARY trial was used for PET image analysis. The dosimetry evaluation of [18F]AlF-thretide was performed on 3 patients. Pathologic examination was used as the reference standard to evaluate the location, number, size, and Gleason score of tumors, for comparison with the [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT results. PSMA expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining. Results: All patients tolerated the [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT well. The total effective dose of [18F]AlF-thretide was 1.16E-02 mSv/MBq. For patient-based analysis of intraprostatic tumors, 46 of 49 (93.9%) patients showed pathologic uptake on [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT. For lesion-based analysis of intraprostatic tumors, the sensitivity and positive predictive value for [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT were 58.2% and 90.5%, respectively. Delayed images can detect more lesions than standard images (n = 57 vs. 49, P = 0.005), and the SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio of the former were higher than those of the latter (SUVmax: 14.5 ± 16.7 vs. 11.4 ± 13.6, P < 0.001; tumor-to-background ratio: 37.1 ± 42.3 vs. 23.1 ± 27.4, P < 0.001). The receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis showed that the areas under the curve for PRIMARY score-predicted true-positive and false-positive lesions were significantly higher than those for the SUVmax of standard images (P = 0.015) and seemed higher than those for the SUVmax of delayed images (P = 0.257). [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT showed a higher detection rate than multiparametric MRI for all intraprostatic foci (53.5% vs. 40.8%, P = 0.012) and clinically significant PCa (75.0% vs. 61.4%, P = 0.031). Conclusion: [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT showed high diagnostic value for patients with primary PCa and can be used as an excellent imaging modality for preoperative evaluation of PCa patients.

Recurrent prostate cancer: combined role for MRI and PSMA-PET in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the specific strengths of MRI and PET components in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for staging of patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

Patients with biochemical recurrence of PCa and contrast-enhanced whole-body 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI including a dedicated pelvic multiparametric MRI were included in this retrospective study. Imaging datasets of MRI and PET were evaluated separately regarding local PCa recurrence (Tr), pelvic lymph node metastases (N1), distant lymph node metastases (M1a), bone metastases (M1b), and soft tissue metastases (M1c) according to PROMISE version 1. Data evaluation was performed patient- and region-/lesion-based. Cox regression revealed a PSA of 1.69 ng/mL as a cut-off for subgroup analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were evaluated for each image component. Differences in staging accuracy were assessed using the Wilcoxon and McNemar test.

RESULTS

Altogether 102 patients (mean aged 68 ± 8 years, median PSA 1.33 ng/mL) were included. PCa was found in 70/102 (68%) patients. Accuracy of MRI in the detection of Tr, N1, M + , M1a, and M1b was 100%, 79%, 90%, 97%, and 95% for PSA < 1.69 ng/mL and 100%, 87%, 87%, 91%, and 96% for PSA > 1.69 ng/mL. Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET was 93%, 97%, 93%, 98%, and 100% for PSA < 1.69 ng/mL and 87%, 91%, 96%, 100%, and 96% for PSA > 1.69 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI improves tumor localization in men with biochemical recurrence. The MRI detected local recurrence of PCa more often whereas 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET detected lymph node metastases more often, especially for PSA < 1.69 ng/mL.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This study gives a scientific baseline to improve the understanding and reading of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI imaging in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa by showing the specific strength of each imaging component.

KEY POINTS

• Combining the individual modality strengths of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI improves tumor localization in men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. • MRI component of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI shows its strength in detecting local recurrence of prostate cancer, especially at PSA < 1.69 ng/mL. • 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET component shows its strength in detecting local and distant lymph node metastases, especially at PSA < 1.69 ng/mL.

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen: Diagnostics

Since its clinical introduction in May 2011, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/computed tomography has quickly gained worldwide recognition as a significant breakthrough in prostate cancer diagnostics. In the meantime, several new PSMA radioligands for PET imaging have been introduced into routine clinical practice. This article aims to introduce the most commonly used tracers and their key areas of application.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Molecular Imaging Techniques for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

Molecular imaging modalities show valuable non-invasive techniques capable of precisely and selectively addressing molecular markers associated with prostate cancer (PCa). This systematic review provides an overview of imaging markers utilized in positron emission tomography (PET) methods, specifically focusing on the pathways and mediators involved in PCa. This systematic review aims to evaluate and analyse existing literature on the diagnostic accuracy of molecular imaging techniques for detecting PCa. The PubMed, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases were searched, identifying 32 studies that reported molecular imaging modalities for detecting PCa. Numerous imaging modalities and radiotracers were used to detect PCa, including 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT), 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI, 18F-choline PET/MRI, and 18F-fluoroethylcholine PET/MRI. Across 11 studies, radiolabelled 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging had a pooled sensitivity of 80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35-93), specificity of 90 (95% CI: 71-98), and accuracy of 86 (95% CI: 64-96). The PSMA-ligand 68Ga-PET/CT showed good diagnostic performance and appears promising for detecting and staging PCa.

Head-to-head comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of pretreatment patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the diagnosis of pretreatment prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies published before June 22, 2022. We assessed risk of bias and applicability by using QUADAS-2 tool. Data synthesis was performed with Stata 17.0 software, using the "midas" and "meqrlogit" packages.

RESULTS

We included 29 articles focusing on primary cancer detection, 18 articles about primary staging, and two articles containing them both. For PSMA PET versus mpMRI in primary PCa detection, sensitivities and specificities in the per-patient analysis were 0.90 and 0.84 (p<0.0001), and 0.66 and 0.60 (p <0.0001), and in the per-lesion analysis they were 0.79 and 0.78 (p <0.0001), and 0.84 and 0.82 (p <0.0001). For the per-patient analysis of PSMA PET versus mpMRI in primary staging, sensitivities and specificities in extracapsular extension detection were 0.59 and 0.66 (p =0.005), and 0.79 and 0.76 (p =0.0074), and in seminal vesicle infiltration (SVI) detection they were 0.51 and 0.60 (p =0.0008), and 0.93 and 0.96 (p =0.0092). For PSMA PET versus mpMRI in lymph node metastasis (LNM) detection, sensitivities and specificities in the per-patient analysis were 0.68 and 0.46 (p <0.0001), and 0.91 and 0.90 (p =0.81), and in the per-lesion analysis they were 0.67 and 0.36 (p <0.0001), and 0.99 and 0.99 (p =0.18).

CONCLUSION

PSMA PET has higher diagnostic value than mpMRI in the detection of primary PCa. Regarding the primary staging, mpMRI has potential advantages in SVI detection, while PSMA PET has relative advantages in LNM detection.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The integration of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET into the diagnostic pathway may be helpful for improving the accuracy of prostate cancer detection. However, further studies are needed to address the cost implications and evaluate its utility in specific patient populations or clinical scenarios. Moreover, we recommend the combination of PSMA PET and mpMRI for cancer staging.

KEY POINTS

• Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET has higher sensitivity and specificity for primary tumor detection in prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. • Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET also has significantly better sensitivity and specificity for lymph node metastases of prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. • Multiparametric MRI has better accuracy for extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle infiltration compared to ate-specific membrane antigen PET.

Knowledge mapping of application of image-guided surgery in prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis (2013-2023)

BACKGROUND

Image-guided surgery (IGS) refers to surgery navigated by medical imaging technology, helping doctors better clarify tumor boundaries, identify metastatic lymph nodes and preserve surrounding healthy tissue function. Recent studies have provided expectable momentum of the application of IGS in prostate cancer (PCa). The authors aim to comprehensively construct a bibliometric analysis of the application of IGS in PCa.

METHOD

The authors searched publications related to application of IGS in PCa from 2013 to 2023 on the web of science core collection (WoSCC) databases. VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and R package 'bibliometrix' were used for bibliometric analysis.

RESULTS

Two thousand three eighty-nine articles from 75 countries and 2883 institutions led by the United States were included. The number of publications related to the application of IGS in PCa kept high in the last decade. Johns Hopkins University is the top research institutions. Journal of Nuclear Medicine has the highest popularity as the selection of journal and co-cited journal. Pomper Martin G. had published the most paper. Ali Afshar-Oromieh was co-cited most frequently. The clinical efficacy of PSMA-PET/CT in PCa diagnosis and treatment are main topics in this research field, with emerging focuses on the use of fluorescence imaging guidance technology in PCa. 'PSMA' and 'PET/CT' are the main keywords as long-term research hotspots.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first bibliometric analysis of researches on application of IGS in PCa with three recognized bibliometric software, providing an objective description and comprehensive guidance for the future relevant investigations.

The accuracy and intra- and interobserver variability of PSMA PET/CT for the local staging of primary prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (PET/CT) is recognized as the most accurate imaging modality for detection of metastatic high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Its role in the local staging of disease is yet unclear. We assessed the intra- and interobserver variability, as well as the diagnostic accuracy of the PSMA PET/CT based molecular imaging local tumour stage (miT-stage) for the local tumour stage assessment in a large, multicentre cohort of patients with intermediate and high-risk primary PCa, with the radical prostatectomy specimen (pT-stage) serving as the reference standard.

METHODS

A total of 600 patients who underwent staging PSMA PET/CT before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was studied. In 579 PSMA positive primary prostate tumours a comparison was made between miT-stage as assessed by four nuclear physicians and the pT-stage according to ISUP protocol. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were determined. In a representative subset of 100 patients, the intra-and interobserver variability were assessed using Kappa-estimates.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of the PSMA PET/CT based miT-stage were 58% and 59% for pT3a-stage, 30% and 97% for ≥ pT3b-stage, and 68% and 61% for overall ≥ pT3-stage, respectively. No statistically significant differences in diagnostic accuracy were found between tracers. We found a substantial intra-observer agreement for PSMA PET/CT assessment of ≥ T3-stage (k 0.70) and ≥ T3b-stage (k 0.75), whereas the interobserver agreement for the assessment of ≥ T3-stage (k 0.47) and ≥ T3b-stage (k 0.41) were moderate.

CONCLUSION

In a large, multicentre study evaluating 600 patients with newly diagnosed intermediate and high-risk PCa, we showed that PSMA PET/CT may have a value in local tumour staging when pathological tumour stage in the radical prostatectomy specimen was used as the reference standard. The intra-observer and interobserver variability of assessment of tumour extent on PSMA PET/CT was moderate to substantial.

Predicting contralateral extraprostatic extension in unilateral high-risk prostate cancer: a multicentric external validation study

PURPOSE

Accurate prediction of extraprostatic extension (EPE) is crucial for decision-making in radical prostatectomy (RP), especially in nerve-sparing strategies. Martini et al. introduced a three-tier algorithm for predicting contralateral EPE in unilateral high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of the study is to externally validate this model in a multicentric European cohort of patients.

METHODS

The data from 208 unilateral high-risk PCa patients diagnosed through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted and systematic biopsies, treated with RP between January 2016 and November 2021 at eight referral centers were collected. The evaluation of model performance involved measures such as discrimination (AUC), calibration, and decision-curve analysis (DCA) following TRIPOD guidelines. In addition, a comparison was made with two established multivariable logistic regression models predicting the risk of side specific EPE for assessment purposes.

RESULTS

Overall, 38%, 48%, and 14% of patients were categorized as low, intermediate, and high-risk groups according to Martini et al.'s model, respectively. At final pathology, EPE on the contralateral prostatic lobe occurred in 6.3%, 12%, and 34% of patients in the respective risk groups. The algorithm demonstrated acceptable discrimination (AUC 0.68), comparable to other multivariable logistic regression models (p = 0.3), adequate calibration and the highest net benefit in DCA. The limitations include the modest sample size, retrospective design, and lack of central revision.

CONCLUSION

Our findings endorse the algorithm's commendable performance, supporting its utility in guiding treatment decisions for unilateral high-risk PCa patients.

Advantage of whole-mount histopathology in prostate cancer: current applications and future prospects

BACKGROUND

Whole-mount histopathology (WMH) has been a powerful tool to investigate the characteristics of prostate cancer. However, the latest advancement of WMH was yet under summarization. In this review, we offer a comprehensive exposition of current research utilizing WMH in diagnosing and treating prostate cancer (PCa), and summarize the clinical advantages of WMH and outlines potential on future prospects.

METHODS

An extensive PubMed search was conducted until February 26, 2023, with the search term "prostate", "whole-mount", "large format histology", which was limited to the last 4 years. Publications included were restricted to those in English. Other papers were also cited to contribute a better understanding.

RESULTS

WMH exhibits an enhanced legibility for pathologists, which improved the efficacy of pathologic examination and provide educational value. It simplifies the histopathological registration with medical images, which serves as a convincing reference standard for imaging indicator investigation and medical image-based artificial intelligence (AI). Additionally, WMH provides comprehensive histopathological information for tumor volume estimation, post-treatment evaluation, and provides direct pathological data for AI readers. It also offers complete spatial context for the location estimation of both intraprostatic and extraprostatic cancerous region.

CONCLUSIONS

WMH provides unique benefits in several aspects of clinical diagnosis and treatment of PCa. The utilization of WMH technique facilitates the development and refinement of various clinical technologies. We believe that WMH will play an important role in future clinical applications.

Using multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography to detect and delineate the gross tumour volume of intraprostatic lesions - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiation therapy is used frequently for patients with prostate cancer. Dose escalation to intraprostatic lesions (IPLs) has been shown to improve oncologic outcomes, without increasing toxicity. Both multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and PSMA PET can be used to identify IPLs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to determine the ability of mpMRI, PSMA PET and their combination to detect IPLs prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) as correlated with the histology. Trials included patients that had mpMRI, PSMA PET, or both, prior to RP. The quality of the histopathological-radiological co-registration was assessed as high or low for each study. Recorded outcomes include sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). A meta-analysis was conducted using a bivariate model to determine the pooled sensitivity and specificity for each imaging modality. This systematic review was registered through PROSPERO (CRD42023389092).

RESULTS

Altogether, 42 studies were included in the systematic review. Of these, 20 could be included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity (95 % CI), specificity (95 % CI) and AUROC for mpMRI (n = 13 studies) were 64.7 % (50.2 % - 76.9 %), 86.4 % (79.7 % - 91.1 %), and 0.852; the pooled outcomes for PSMA PET (n = 12) were 75.7 % (64.0 % - 84.5 %), 87.1 % (80.2 % - 91.9 %), and 0.889; for their combination (n = 5), the pooled outcomes were 70.3 % (64.1 % - 75.9 %), 81.9 % (71.9 % - 88.8 %), and 0.796. When reviewing studies with a high-quality histopathological-radiological co-registration, IPL delineation recommendations varied by study and the imaging modality used.

CONCLUSION

All of mpMRI, PSMA PET or their combination were found to have very good diagnostic outcomes for detecting IPLs. Recommendations for delineating IPLs varied based on the imaging modalities used and between research groups. Consensus guidelines for IPL delineation would help with creating consistency for focal boost radiation treatments in future studies.

Radiotheranostics in advanced prostate cancer: Current and future directions

The discovery of small molecules that target the extracellular domain of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has led to advancements in diagnostic imaging and the development of precision radiopharmaceutical therapies. In this review, we present the available existing data and highlight the key ongoing clinical evaluations of PSMA-based imaging in the management of primary, biochemically recurrent, and metastatic prostate cancer. We also discuss clinical studies that explore the use of PSMA-based radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) in metastatic prostate cancer and forthcoming trials that investigate PSMA RPT in earlier disease states. Multidisciplinary collaboration in clinical trial design and therapeutic administration is critical to the continued progress of this evolving radiotheranostics field.

Multimodal radiomics based on 18F-Prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007 PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer extracapsular extension prediction

OBJECTIVES

To compare the performance of the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) radiomics and 18F-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 PET/CT radiomics model in diagnosing extracapsular extension (EPE) in prostate cancer (PCa), and to evaluate the performance of a multimodal radiomics model combining mpMRI and PET/CT in predicting EPE.

METHODS

We included 197 patients with PCa who underwent preoperative mpMRI and PET/CT before surgery. mpMRI and PET/CT images were segmented to delineate the regions of interest and extract radiomics features. PET/CT, mpMRI, and multimodal radiomics models were constructed based on maximum correlation, minimum redundancy, and logistic regression analyses. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and indices derived from the confusion matrix.

RESULTS

AUC values for the mpMRI, PET/CT, and multimodal radiomics models were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90), 0.73 (0.64-0.80), and 0.83 (0.75-0.89), respectively, in the training cohort and 0.74 (0.61-0.85), 0.62 (0.48-0.74), and 0.77 (0.64-0.87), respectively, in the testing cohort. The net reclassification improvement demonstrated that the mpMRI radiomics model outperformed the PET/CT one in predicting EPE, with better clinical benefits. The multimodal radiomics model performed better than the single PET/CT radiomics model (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The mpMRI and 18F-PSMA-PET/CT combination enhanced the predictive power of EPE in patients with PCa. The multimodal radiomics model will become a reliable and robust tool to assist urologists and radiologists in making preoperative decisions.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study presents the first application of multimodal radiomics based on PET/CT and MRI for predicting EPE.

Advances in radiology and pathology of prostate cancer: a review for the pathologist

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has improved systematic prostate biopsy procedures in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) by reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies; numerous level one evidence studies have confirmed the accuracy of MRI-targeted biopsy, but, still today, systematic prostate biopsy is recommended to reduce the 15-20% false negative rate of mpMRI. New advanced imaging has been proposed to detect suspicious lesions and perform targeted biopsies especially when mpMRI cannot be performed. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) modalities are emerging as methods with greater sensitivity and specificity for the detection of PCa compared to the traditional TRUS; these techniques include elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, as well as improved B-mode and Doppler techniques. These modalities can be combined to define a novel ultrasound approach: multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS). More recently, micro-ultrasound (MicroUS) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) have demonstrated to be sensitive for the detection of primary prostatic lesions resulting highly correlated with the aggressiveness of the primary prostatic tumor. In parallel, artificial intelligence is advancing and is set out to deeply change both radiology and pathology. In this study we address the role, advantages and shortcomings of novel imaging techniques for Pca, and discuss future directions including the applications of artificial intelligence-based techniques to imaging as well as histology. The significance of these findings for the practicing pathologist is discussed.

Rational use of Ga-68 PSMA PET-CT according to nomograms and risk groups for the detection of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to ensure efficient utilization of PSMA PET-CT by examining the correlation of pathological lymph node metastasis with nomogram scores and risk classifications.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissections for pelvic lymph nodes were performed using the same template. Bilaterally pelvic lymph nodes were removed within the boundaries of genitofemoral nerves, psoas muscle and lateral pelvic wall laterally, ureteric crossing of the iliac vessels superiorly, lateral bladder wall medially, Cooper ligaments distally, and endopelvic fascia, neurovascular bundles and internal iliac arteries posteriorly. Clinical nomograms were used to calculate the probability of lymph node metastasis preoperatively. Using receiver operating characteristics analysis, discriminatory cut-offs were calculated. The diagnostic performance of PSMA PET-CT was determined for detecting lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

For 81 patients, the median age was 64 years. The median PSA was 6.8 ng/ml. Most patients were in the D'Amico intermediate (56.8%) and high (37%) risk groups. Median Briganti 2017, MSKCC, and Partin scores were 35 (4-99), 37 (8-90), and 12 (2-38), respectively, in pN1 patients. The area under the curve for Briganti 2017, MSKCC, Partin nomograms and PSMA PET-CT scans were 0.852, 0.871, 0.862, and 0.588. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for Ga-68 PSMA PET-CT for lymph node metastasis detection were 21.4%, 94%, 42.9%, and 85.1%, respectively, for the whole group. By using higher threshold values for clinical nomograms (Briganti 2017 >32, MSKCC >12, Partin >5), PSMA PET-CT had higher sensitivity (42.9, 30, 27.2) in detecting lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the D'Amico high-risk group and those with high nomogram scores are the best candidates who will benefit from preoperative PSMA PET-CT staging to estimate lymph node metastasis.

Impact of PSMA PET on Prostate Cancer Management

OPINION STATEMENT

PSMA-PET has been a practice-changing imaging biomarker for the management of men with PCa. Research suggests improved accuracy over conventional imaging and other PET radiotracers in many contexts. With multiple approved PSMA-targeting radiotracers, PSMA PET will become even more available in clinical practice. Its increased use requires an understanding of the prospective data available and caution when extrapolating from prior trial data that utilized other imaging modalities. Future trials leveraging PSMA PET for treatment optimization and management decision-making will ultimately drive its clinical utility.

The Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and Tumor Molecular Profiling on Risk Stratification, Treatment Choice, and Oncological Outcomes of Patients with Primary or Relapsed Prostate Cancer: An International Collaborative Review of the Existing Literature

CONTEXT

The clinical introduction of next-generation imaging methods and molecular biomarkers ("radiogenomics") has revolutionized the field of prostate cancer (PCa). While the clinical validity of these tests has thoroughly been vetted, their clinical utility remains a matter of investigation.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the evidence to date on the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and tissue-based prognostic biomarkers, including Decipher, Prolaris, and Oncotype Dx, on the risk stratification, treatment choice, and oncological outcomes of men with newly diagnosed PCa or those with biochemical failure (BCF).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a quantitative systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases (2010-2022) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement guidelines. The validated Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 scoring system was used to assess the risk of bias.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 148 studies (130 on PET and 18 on biomarkers) were included. In the primary PCa setting, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging was not useful in improving T staging, moderately useful in improving N staging, but consistently useful in improving M staging in patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) unfavorable intermediate- to very-high-risk PCa. Its use led to a management change in 20-30% of patients. However, the effect of these treatment changes on survival outcomes was not clear. Similarly, biomarkers in the pretherapy primary PCa setting increased and decreased the risk, respectively, in 7-30% and 32-36% of NCCN low-risk and 31-65% and 4-15% of NCCN favorable intermediate-risk patients being considered for active surveillance. A change in management was noted in up to 65% of patients, with the change being in line with the molecular risk-based reclassification, but again, the impact of these changes on survival outcomes remained unclear. Notably, in the postsurgical primary PCa setting, biomarker-guided adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) was associated with improved oncological control: Δ↓ 2-yr BCF by 22% (level 2b). In the BCF setting, the data were more mature. PSMA PET was consistently useful in improving disease localization-Δ↑ detection for T, N, and M staging was 13-32%, 19-58%, and 9-29%, respectively. Between 29% and 73% of patients had a change in management. Most importantly, these management changes were associated with improved survival outcomes in three trials: Δ↑ 4-yr disease-free survival by 24.3%, Δ↑ 6-mo metastasis-free survival (MFS) by 46.7%, and Δ↑ androgen deprivation therapy-free survival by 8 mo in patients who received PET-concordant RT (level 1b-2b). Biomarker testing in these patients also appeared to be helpful in risk stratifying and guiding the use of early salvage RT (sRT) and concomitant hormonal therapy. Patients with high-genomic-risk scores benefitted from treatment intensification: Δ↑ 8-yr MFS by 20% with the use of early sRT and Δ↑ 12-yr MFS by 11.2% with the use of hormonal therapy alongside early sRT, while low-genomic-risk score patients did equally well with initial conservative management (level 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Both PSMA PET imaging and tumor molecular profiling provide actionable information in the management of men with primary PCa and those with BCF. Emerging data suggest that radiogenomics-guided treatments translate into direct survival benefits for patients, however, additional prospective data are awaited.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this review, we evaluated the utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and tumor molecular profiling in guiding the care of men with prostate cancer (PCa). We found that these tests augmented risk stratification, altered management, and improved cancer control in men with a new diagnosis of PCa or for those experiencing a relapse.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: Gateway to Management of Advanced Prostate Cancer

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) as a transmembrane protein is overexpressed by prostate cancer (PC) cells and is accessible for binding antibodies or low-molecular-weight radioligands due to its extracellular portion. Successful targeting of PSMA began with the development of humanized J591 antibody. Due to their faster clearance compared to antibodies, small-molecule radioligands for targeted imaging and therapy of PC have been favored in recent development efforts. PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has higher diagnostic performance than conventional imaging for initial staging of high-risk PC and biochemical recurrence detection/localization. However, it remains to be demonstrated how to integrate PSMA PET imaging for therapy response assessment and as an outcome endpoint measure in clinical trials. With the recent approval of 177Lu-PSMA-617 by the US Food and Drug Administration for metastatic castration-resistant PC progressing after chemotherapy, the high value of PSMA-targeted therapy was confirmed. Compared to standard of care, PSMA-based radioligand therapy led to a better outcome and a higher quality of life. This review, focusing on the advanced PC setting, provides an overview of different approved and nonapproved PSMA-targeted imaging and therapeutic modalities and discusses the future of PSMA-targeted theranostics, also with an outlook on non-radiopharmaceutical-based PSMA-targeted therapies.

68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen-11 PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI in the detection of primary prostate cancer: A systematic review and head-to-head comparative meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two diagnostic methods, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI, in detecting primary prostate cancer without limitations on the Gleason score.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature review, searching databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until June 2023. Our objective was to identify studies that compared the efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI in detecting primary prostate cancer. To determine heterogeneity, the I2 statistic was used. Meta-regression analysis and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Initially, 1286 publications were found, but after careful evaluation, only 16 studies involving 1227 patients were analyzed thoroughly. The results showed that the 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT method had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.80-0.92) and 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.89), respectively, for diagnosing prostatic cancer. Similarly, the values for mpMRI were determined as 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.75-0.92) and 0.74 (95 % CI: 0.61-0.86), respectively. There were no significant differences in diagnostic effectiveness observed when comparing two primary prostate cancer methodologies (pooled sensitivity P = 0.62, pooled specificity P = 0.50). Despite this, the funnel plots showed symmetry and the Egger test results (P values > 0.05) suggested there was no publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

After an extensive meta-analysis, it was found that both 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI demonstrate similar diagnostic effectiveness in detecting primary prostate cancer. Future larger prospective studies are warranted to investigate this issue further.

A Rare Case of Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer Detected on 68Ga - DOTANOC Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT)

Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies affecting elderly men worldwide and the fifth leading cause of cancer death in men. Prostate cancer includes many histological variants with the prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma variant accounting for the majority of the diagnosed cases. Other less common histological variants are broadly classified as non-acinar carcinomas. One of the non-acinar carcinoma variants is neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). NEPC can emerge as a mechanism of treatment resistance in castration-resistant conventional prostate cancer and can also rarely be seen as a primary histological form at the time of initial diagnosis. Like other non-acinar carcinoma variants of prostate cancer, NEPC is also an aggressive variant with associated poor prognosis. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are characterized by the expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs). Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using radiolabeled somatostatin analogs like DOTANOC have been used to detect and stage these NETs. These radiolabeled somatostatin analogs also provide the option of treatment of these tumors and have been used in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of these tumors. NEPC being a neuroendocrine malignancy also expresses SSTRs and hence can be detected with PET/CT radiotracers like 68Gallium-labeled somatostatin analogs. We here report a case of metastatic treatment-emergent NEPC detected on 68Ga - DOTANOC PET/CT.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/Computed Tomography: Pearls and Pitfalls

Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET (PSMA-PET) has emerged as a powerful imaging tool for prostate cancer primary staging, biochemical recurrence, and advanced disease assessment. This article offers a concise overview of the benefits and challenges associated with PSMA-PET for prostate cancer evaluation. The article highlights the advantages of PSMA-PET over conventional imaging, such as its higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting metastases, and the potential for guiding personalized treatment decisions. However, it also explores the limitations and potential pitfalls for interpretation. Overall, the article aims to provide valuable insights for clinicians and diagnostic imaging physicians in clinical practice.

Targeted Biopsy in Men High Risk for Prostate Cancer: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Versus mpMRI

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

To evaluate the accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus mpMRI targeted biopsy (TPBx) in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men high risk for PCa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2021 to March 2023, 125 men with clinical parameters high risk for PCa were evaluated by mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT; median PSA was 32.5 ng/mL (range: 12-160 ng/mL) and 60/125 (48%) had abnormal digital rectal examination. The mpMRI lesions with PI-RADS scores ≥ 3 and/or 68Ga-PSMA areas characterized by a standardized uptake value (SUVmax) values ≥ 8 were submitted to TPBx (4 cores); in addition, all the patients underwent systematic transperineal prostate biopsy (18 cores) under sedation and antibiotic prophylaxis.

RESULTS

In 80 of 125 men (64%) a csPCa was found: 10 (12.5%) had a ISUP Grade Group 3 (GG), 45 (56.2%) a ISUP GG4 and 25 (31.2%) ISUP GG5. The median intraprostatic 68Ga-PSMA SUVmax was 42.3 (range:10.5-164) and 72 of 80 (90%) had a PI-RADS score ≥ 3. 68GaPSMA PET/CT showed the presence of metastases in 20 of 80 (25%) men: the median SUVmax in bone (15 cases) and nodes (40 cases) metastases was 55 and 47, respectively. Accuracy of 68Ga PSMA PET/CT (SUVmax cut-off ≥ 8) versus mpMRI PI-RADS score ≥ 3 in the diagnosis of csPCa was 92 versus 86.2%.

CONCLUSION

68GaPSMA PET/CT demonstrated a good diagnostic accuracy as a single procedure for the diagnosis and staging of high-risk PCa.

The diagnostic accuracy of radiolabeled PSMA-ligand PET for tumour staging in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients compared to histopathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The current clinical recommendations posit the deployment of specific approved radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-ligand positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) for detecting metastatic prostate cancer during primary staging. Nevertheless, the precise efficacy of such ligands in localizing intraprostatic tumours (index tumour) and T-staging is not well established. Consequently, the objective of this inquiry is to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-PET in the tumour staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer by means of a meta-analysis that integrates studies utilizing histological confirmation as the reference standard.

METHODS

In this study, we conducted a systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases using a predefined collection of search terms. These terms included 'PSMA PET', 'primary staging', and 'prostate cancer'. Subsequently, two independent reviewers evaluated all the studies based on predetermined inclusion criteria, extracted pertinent data, and assessed the quality of evidence. Any disparities were resolved by a third reviewer. A random effects Sidik-Jonkman model was applied to conduct a meta-analysis and estimate the diagnostic accuracy on a per-patient basis, along with 95% confidence intervals. Moreover, an appraisal regarding the likelihood of publication bias and the impact of small-study effects was performed utilizing both Egger's test and a graphical examination of the funnel plot.

RESULTS

The present analysis comprised a total of twenty-three scientific papers encompassing 969 patients and involved their analysis by both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The results of this study demonstrated that the estimated diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT and PSMA PET/MRI, for the detection of intraprostatic tumours, regardless of the type of PSMA-ligand, was 86% (95% CI: 76-96%) and 97% (95% CI: 94-100%), respectively. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of extraprostatic extension (EPE) was 73% (95% CI: 64-82%) and 77% (95% CI: 69-85%), while the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of seminal vesicle involvement (SVI) was 87% (95% CI: 80-93) and 90% (95% CI: 82-99%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The present investigation has demonstrated that PSMA PET/MRI surpasses currently recommended multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in terms of diagnostic accuracy as inferred from a notable data trajectory, whereas PSMA-PET/CT exhibited comparable diagnostic accuracy for intraprostatic tumour detection and T-staging compared to mpMRI. Nevertheless, the analysis has identified certain potential limitations, such as small-study effects and a potential for publication bias, which may impact the overall conclusions drawn from this study.

Evaluating the value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in the detection and identification of prostate cancer using histopathology as the standard

BACKGROUND

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is a highly regarded radionuclide imaging modality for prostate cancer (PCa). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in detecting intraprostatic lesions of PCa using radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens as a reference standard and to establish an optimal maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) cutoff for distinguishing between PCa and non-PCa lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected 117 patients who underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT before RP. The uptake of the index tumor and contralateral non-PCa lesion was assessed. Histopathology of RP specimens was used as the gold standard. Kappa test was used to evaluate the consistency of preoperative PSMA PET/CT staging and postoperative pathological staging. Finally, an SUVmax cutoff value was identified by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to distinguish PCa lesions from non-PCa lesions. A prospective cohort including 76 patients was used to validate the results.

RESULTS

The detection rate of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for prostate cancer was 96.6% (113/117). 18F-PSMA-1007 had a sensitivity of 91.2% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 89.8% for the identification of intraprostatic lesions. The consistency test (Kappa = 0.305) indicated poor agreement between the pathologic T-stage and PSMA PET/CT T-stage. Based on ROC curve analysis, the appropriate SUVmax to diagnose PCa lesions was 8.3 (sensitivity of 71.3% and specificity 96.8%) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 (P < 0.001). This SUVmax cutoff discriminated PCa lesions from non-PCa lesions with a sensitivity of 74.4%, a specificity of 95.8% in the prospective validation group.

CONCLUSIONS

18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT demonstrated excellent performance in detecting PCa. An optimal SUVmax threshold (8.3) could be utilized to identify lesions of PCa by 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04521894, Registered: August 17, 2020.

The role of nuclear medicine tracers for prostate cancer surgery: from preoperative to intraoperative setting

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There has been a growing interest in the use of novel molecular imaging modalities for the management of prostate cancer (PCa), spanning from diagnostic to therapeutic settings. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of recently published studies investigating the use of novel nuclear medicine tracers across different stages of PCa management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging evidence supports the use of molecular imaging for preoperative staging of PCa, where prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET has shown superior accuracy compared to conventional imaging for the detection of nodal and distant metastases, which needs to be translated to new risk stratification. A role for PSMA PET has been proposed for PCa diagnosis, with local activity associated with histology. Surgical guidance, using either visual feedback or gamma-ray detectors to identify tissues with accumulated radio-labeled tracers, may improve the ability to resect locoregional diseases and thus maximize oncological control. PSMA targeted therapy (Lu-PSMA) has been mainly investigated in the castration-resistant setting, but might have a role in earlier settings such as neoadjuvant treatment.

SUMMARY

Novel molecular imaging using PSMA-based tracers could significantly improve PCa management in the diagnosis, staging, and intraoperative guidance settings, potentially leading to personalized and effective treatment decisions.

PI-RADS-Based Segmented Threshold of PSMA-PET SUVmax Is Better than Traditional Fixed Threshold for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Especially for PI-RADS 3 Lesions

OBJECTIVES

Our purpose was to compare the performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positron emission tomography (PET) traditional fixed threshold (FT) and newly established Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)-based segmented threshold (ST) for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).

METHODS

The study retrospectively included 218 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and PSMA-PET examination for suspected prostate cancer (PCa) from January 2018 to November 2021. Lesions with Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 were diagnosed as csPCa. In PSMA-PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), the FT for all the lesions and STs for lesions with different PI-RADS score for diagnosing csPCa were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis and compared with Z test. The McNemar test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Among the 218 patients, there were 113 csPCa and 105 non-csPCa. The PSMA-PET FT was SUVmax > 5.3 (area under the curve, AUC = 0.842) and STs for PI-RADS 3/4/5 were SUVmax > 4.2/5.7/6.0 (AUCs = 0.870/0.867/0.882), respectively. The AUC of PSMA-PET ST was higher than that of PSMA-PET FT (0.872 vs. 0.842), especially for PI-RADS 3 (0.870 vs. 0.653). Multimodality diagnostic criteria combining PSMA-PET ST and PI-RADS scores of mpMRI was established and its AUC was higher than that of PSMA-PET ST (0.893 vs. 0.872) and significantly higher than that of PSMA-PET FT (0.893 vs. 0.842) with an improvement in sensitivity (93% vs. 78%, p < 0.05) without significantly sacrificing specificity (86% vs. 91%, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For diagnosing csPCa, PI-RADS-based PSMA-PET segmented threshold achieved better performance than traditional fixed threshold, especially for PI-RADS 3 lesions. Multimodality diagnostic criteria demonstrated higher diagnostic performance than segmented threshold and significantly better than PSMA-PET fixed threshold for detecting csPCa.

Prostate MRI and PSMA-PET in the Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Over the last years, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained a key role in the primary diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). While a negative MRI can avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies and the overdiagnosis of indolent cancers, a positive examination triggers biopsy samples targeted to suspicious imaging findings, thus increasing the diagnosis of csPCa with a sensitivity and negative predictive value of around 90%. The limitations of MRI, including suboptimal positive predictive values, are fueling debate on how to stratify biopsy decisions and management based on patient risk and how to correctly estimate it with clinical and/or imaging findings. In this setting, "next-generation imaging" imaging based on radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is expanding its indications both in the setting of primary staging (intermediate-to-high risk patients) and primary diagnosis (e.g., increasing the sensitivity of MRI or acting as a problem-solving tool for indeterminate MRI cases). This review summarizes the current main evidence on the role of prostate MRI and PSMA-PET as tools for the primary diagnosis of csPCa, and the different possible interaction pathways in this setting.

A Novel Risk Calculator Incorporating Clinical Parameters, Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification Before Transperineal Prostate Biopsy

Background

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can detect multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-invisible prostate tumours and improve the sensitivity of detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in comparison to mpMRI alone. Numerous risk calculators have been validated as tools for stratification of men at risk of being diagnosed with clinically significant (cs)PCa.

Objective

To develop a novel risk calculator using clinical parameters and imaging parameters from mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT in a cohort of patients undergoing mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT before biopsy.

Design setting and participants

A total of 291 men from the PRIMARY prospective trial underwent mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT before transperineal prostate biopsy with sampling of systematic and targeted cores.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Novel risk calculators were developed using multivariable logistic regression analysis to predict detection of overall PCa (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group [GG] ≥1) and csPCa (GG ≥2). The risk calculators were then compared with the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer risk calculator incorporating mpMRI (ERSPC-MRI). Resampling methods were used to evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the risk calculators and to perform decision curve analysis.

Results and limitations

Age, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, and mpMRI Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System scores were included in the MRI risk calculator, resulting in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.791 for overall PCa (GG ≥1) and 0.812 for csPCa (GG ≥2). Addition of the maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) on PSMA PET/CT for the prostate lesion, and of SUVmax for the mpMRI lesions for the MRI-PSMA risk calculator resulted in AUCs of 0.831 for overall PCa and 0.876 for csPCa (≥ISUP2).The ERSPC-MRI risk calculator had AUCs of 0.758 (p = 0.02) for overall PCa and 0.805 (p = 0.001) for csPCa. Both the MRI and MRI-PSMA risk calculators were superior to the ERSPC-MRI for both overall PCa and csPCa.

Conclusions

These novel risk calculators incorporate clinical and radiological parameters for stratification of men at risk of csPCa. The risk calculator including PSMA PET/CT data is superior to a calculator incorporating mpMRI data alone.

Patient summary

We evaluated a new risk calculator that uses clinical information and results from two types of scan to predict the risk of clinically significant prostate cancer on prostate biopsy. This risk model can guide patients and clinicians in shared decision-making and may help in avoiding unnecessary prostate biopsies.

Comparing the Detection Performance Between Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has been promoted as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for prostate biopsy. However, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) including 68 Ga-PSMA-11, 18 F-DCFPyL, and 18 F-PSMA-1007 applied PET/CT imaging was an emerging diagnostic tool in prostate cancer patients for staging or posttreatment follow-up, even early detecting. Many studies have used PSMA PET for comparison with mpMRI to test the diagnostic ability for early prostate cancer. Unfortunately, these studies have shown conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the differences in diagnostic performance between PSMA PET and mpMRI for detecting and T staging localized prostatic tumors.

METHODS

This meta-analysis involved a systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases. The pooling sensitivity and specificity of PSMA and mpMRI verified by pathological analysis were calculated and used to compare the differences between the 2 imaging tools.

RESULTS

Overall, 39 studies were included (3630 patients in total) from 2016 to 2022 in the current meta-analysis and found that the pooling sensitivity values for localized prostatic tumors and T staging T3a and T3b of PSMA PET were 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.86), 0.61 (95% CI, 0.39-0.79), and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.46-0.76), respectively, whereas those of mpMRI were found to be 0.84 (95% 0.78-0.89), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.80), and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.45-0.73), respectively, without significant differences ( P > 0.05). However, in a subgroup analysis of radiotracer, the pooling sensitivity of 18 F-DCFPyL PET was higher than mpMRI (relative risk, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis found that whereas 18 F-DCFPyL PET was superior to mpMRI at detecting localized prostatic tumors, the detection performance of PSMA PET for localized prostatic tumors and T staging was comparable to that of mpMRI.

PI-RADS: Where Next?

Prostate MRI plays an important role in the clinical management of localized prostate cancer, mainly assisting in biopsy decisions and guiding biopsy procedures. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) has been available to radiologists since 2012, with the most up-to-date and actively used version being PI-RADS version 2.1. This review article discusses the current use of PI-RADS, including its limitations and controversies, and summarizes research that aims to improve future iterations of this system.

The role of [18F]-DCFPyL PET/MRI radiomics for pathological grade group prediction in prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]-DCFPyL PET/MRI radiomics for the prediction of pathological grade group in prostate cancer (PCa) in therapy-naïve patients.

METHODS

Patients with confirmed or suspected PCa, who underwent [18F]-DCFPyL PET/MRI (n = 105), were included in this retrospective analysis of two prospective clinical trials. Radiomic features were extracted from the segmented volumes following the image biomarker standardization initiative (IBSI) guidelines. Histopathology obtained from systematic and targeted biopsies of the PET/MRI-detected lesions was the reference standard. Histopathology patterns were dichotomized as ISUP GG 1-2 vs. ISUP GG ≥ 3 categories. Different single-modality models were defined for feature extraction, including PET- and MRI-derived radiomic features. The clinical model included age, PSA, and lesions' PROMISE classification. Single models, as well as different combinations of them, were generated to calculate their performances. A cross-validation approach was used to evaluate the internal validity of the models.

RESULTS

All radiomic models outperformed the clinical models. The best model for grade group prediction was the combination of PET + ADC + T2w radiomic features, showing sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC of 0.85, 0.83, 0.84, and 0.85, respectively. The MRI-derived (ADC + T2w) features showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC of 0.88, 0.78, 0.83, and 0.84, respectively. PET-derived features showed 0.83, 0.68, 0.76, and 0.79, respectively. The baseline clinical model showed 0.73, 0.44, 0.60, and 0.58, respectively. The addition of the clinical model to the best radiomic model did not improve the diagnostic performance. The performances of MRI and PET/MRI radiomic models as per the cross-validation scheme yielded an accuracy of 0.80 (AUC = 0.79), whereas clinical models presented an accuracy of 0.60 (AUC = 0.60).

CONCLUSION

The combined [18F]-DCFPyL PET/MRI radiomic model was the best-performing model and outperformed the clinical model for pathological grade group prediction, indicating a complementary value of the hybrid PET/MRI model for non-invasive risk stratification of PCa. Further prospective studies are required to confirm the reproducibility and clinical utility of this approach.

PET/CT imaging 2 h after injection of [18F]PSMA-1007 can lead to higher staging of prostate cancer than imaging after 1 h

BACKGROUND

[¹⁸F]PSMA-1007 is a prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of prostate cancer. Current guidelines recommend imaging 90-120 min after injection but strong data about optimal timing is lacking. Our aim was to study whether imaging after 1 h and 2 h leads to a different number of detected lesions, with a specific focus on lesions that might lead to a change in treatment.

METHODS

195 patients underwent PET with computed tomography imaging 1 and 2 h after injection of [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007. Three readers assessed the status of the prostate or prostate bed and suspected metastases. We analyzed the location and number of found metastases to determine N- and M-stage of patients. We also analyzed standardized uptake values (SUV) in lesions and in normal tissue.

RESULTS

Significantly more pelvic lymph nodes and bone metastases were found and higher N- and M-stages were seen after 2 h. In twelve patients (6.1%) two or three readers agreed on a higher N- or M-stage after 2 h. Conversely, in two patients (1.0%), two readers agreed on a higher stage at 1 h. SUVs in suspected malignant lesions and in normal tissues were higher at 2 h, but lower in the blood pool and urinary bladder.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging at 2 h after injection of [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007 leads to more suspected metastases found than after 1 h, with higher staging in some patients and possible effect on patient treatment.

An Australian experience using Tc-PSMA SPECT/CT in the primary diagnosis of prostate cancer and for staging at biochemical recurrence after local therapy

BACKGROUND

Technetium 99 prostate-specific membrane antigen (Tc-PSMA) single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) has the potential to provide greater accessibility globally than gallium 68 (Ga)-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/CT but has not been studied as extensively in primary diagnosis, staging, or relapse of prostate cancer (PC). We instituted a novel SPECT/CT reconstruction algorithm using Tc-PSMA and established a database to prospectively accumulate data on all patients referred with PC. This study extracts data on all patients referred over a 3.5-year period with the primary aim of comparing the diagnostic accuracy of Tc-PSMA and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the primary diagnosis of PC. The secondary aim was to assess the sensitivity of Tc-PSMA in detecting disease with relapse after either radical prostatectomy or primary radiotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 425 men referred for primary staging (PS) of PC and 172 men referred with biochemical relapse (BCR) were evaluated. We evaluated diagnostic accuracy and correlations between Tc-PSMA SPECT/CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), prostate biopsy, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and age in the PS group and positivity rates at different PSA levels in the BCR group.

RESULTS

Taking the biopsy's grade according to the International Society of Urological Pathology protocol as a reference, the sensitivity (true positive rate), specificity (true negative rate), accuracy (positive and negative predictive value), and precision (positive predictive value) for Tc-PSMA in the PS group were 99.7%, 83.3%, 99.4%, and 99.7%, respectively. Comparison rates for MRI in this group were 96.4%, 71.4%, 95.7%, and 99.1%. We found moderate correlations between Tc-PSMA uptake in the prostate and biopsy grade, the presence of metastases, and PSA. In BCR, the Tc-PSMA positive rates were 38.9%, 53.2%, 62.5%, and 84.6% at PSA levels of <0.2, 0.2 to <0.5, 0.5 to <1.0, and > 1.0 ng/mL respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that Tc-PSMA SPECT/CT using an enhanced reconstruction algorithm has a diagnostic performance similar to Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI in an everyday clinical setting. It may have some advantages in cost, sensitivity for primary lesion detection, and the ability for intraoperative localization of lymph nodes.

Second Version of the Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation Framework Including Response Evaluation for Clinical Trials (PROMISE V2)

CONTEXT

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting positron emission tomography (PET) is emerging to become a reference imaging tool for the staging and restaging of patients with prostate cancer for both clinical routine and trials. The prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation (PROMISE) criteria have been proposed as a framework for whole-body staging (molecular imaging TNM staging, denoted miTNM staging) to describe the prostate cancer disease extent on PSMA-PET.

OBJECTIVE

To create a comprehensive and integrated framework for PSMA-PET image interpretation and reporting.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We propose the PROMISE V2 framework, which integrates an updated miTNM system, improved assessment of local disease, and a slightly modified PSMA-expression score for clinical routine. We have added a response monitoring framework defining qualitative and quantitative parameters to be recorded for a longitudinal assessment in clinical trials.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We provide a comprehensive literature review on the current use of the PROMISE framework in clinical research and prospective trials. PROMISE variables demonstrate a clear association with survival. PSMA expression assessed by the PSMA-expression score was used in several trials, and a low PSMA-expression score is a negative prognosticator of overall survival after ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy. The proposed imaging parameters recorded for response assessment in clinical trials can be utilized to determine response according to PSMA-PET progression (PPP) or Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA-PET/Computed Tomography (RECIP) frameworks, but also future response criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMISE V2 offers standardized reporting of disease extent for clinical routine and research. Parameters recorded within clinical trials facilitate objective response assessment.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting positron emission tomography (PET) has become a standard imaging examination for prostate cancer. We propose a comprehensive framework for the analysis and reporting of PSMA-PET findings that will improve the communication between imaging experts and uro-oncologists.

A comprehensive comparison between mpMRI of the prostate, MR-US fusion biopsy and whole mount histopathology

OBJECTIVES

To compare multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) findings, US-MR fusion prostate biopsy results and whole-mount thin-section histopathology after radical prostatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Overall 259 patients, who had undergone mpMRI with lesions reported as PI-RADS 3-5, underwent a MR-US fusion biopsy between 2018 and 2020. Overall 186 biopsies yielded prostate cancer and 104 patients subsequently underwent endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Histopathology of biopsies was compared to the final histopathology in whole mount thin sections after radical prostatectomy by means of descriptive statistics, and further, the lesions from mpMRT were compared to whole mount histology.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 186 (71.8%) of 259 patients (median age 69.2 y, range 42-82 y, median PSA 7.8 ng/ml, range 2.1-31.3 ng/ml). Of those, 95 (51,1%) underwent radical endoscopic prostatectomy, and 80 (43%) chose radiotherapy or active surveillance. In 52/95 (54,7%) with RPE additional lesions were found in the final histological whole mount sections not described at mpMRI. 22/95 (23,2%) of RPE patients had ≥ 1 additional Gleason score ≥ 7 lesions, 23 /259 (8,4%) of biopsies, respectively. The Gleason score after surgery was upgraded in 37/95 (38,9%) and downgraded in 18/95 (18,9%) patients.

CONCLUSION

If we compare all 259 performed biopsies with the final histological whole mount sections which showed additional lesions with Gleason ≥ 7 (23,2%), it can be assumed that up to 10% of clinical significant carcinomas are missed during primary assessment via mpMRI. The majority of additional findings after RP were intermediate/high risk tumors. Upgrades from low-risk to intermediate or high-risk occurred.

Assessing extra-prostatic extension for surgical guidance in prostate cancer: Comparing two PSMA-PET tracers with the standard-of-care

BACKGROUND

Incontinence and impotence occur following radical prostatectomy due to injury to nerves and sphincter muscle. Preserving nerves and muscle adjacent to prostate cancer risks positive surgical margins. Advanced imaging with MRI has improved cancer localization but limitations exist.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the accuracy for assessing extra-prostatic extension at nerve bundles for 2 PSMA-PET tracers and to compare the PET accuracy to standard-of-care predictors including MRI and biopsy results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied men with PSMA-targeted PET imaging, performed prior to prostatectomy in men largely with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer, and retrospectively evaluated for assessment of extra-prostatic extension with whole-mount analysis as reference standard. Two different PSMA-PET tracers were included: 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 68Ga-P16-093. Blinded reviews of the PET and MRI scans were performed to assess extra-prostatic extension (EPE). Sensitivity and specificity for extra-prostatic extension were compared using McNemar's Chi2.

RESULTS

Pre-operative PSMA-PET imaging was available for 71 patients with either 68Ga-P16-093 (n = 25) or 68Ga-PSMA-11 (n = 46). There were 24 (34%) with pT3a (EPE) and 16 (23%) with pT3b (SVI). EPE Sensitivity (87% vs. 92%), Specificity (77% vs. 76%), and ROC area (0.82 vs. 0.84) were similar between P16-093 and PSMA-11, respectively (P = 0.87). MRI (available in only 45) found high specificity (83%) but low sensitivity (60%) for EPE when using a published grading system. MRI sensitivity was significantly lower than the PSMA-PET (60% vs. 90%, P = 0.02), but similar to PET when using a >5 mm capsular contact (76% vs. 90%, P = 0.38). A treatment change to "nerve sparing" was recommended in 21 of 71 (30%) patients based on PSMA-PET imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Presurgical PSMA-PET appeared useful as a tool for surgical planning, changing treatment plans in men with ≥4+3 or multi-core 3+4 prostate cancer resulting in preservation of nerve-bundles.

Comparison of PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and pelvic multiparametric MRI for lesion detection in the pelvis in patients with prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To directly compare the performance of pelvic mpMRI versus recently approved and increasingly used PSMA-based ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT in intermediate-high risk and biochemical recurrent prostate cancer patient cohort while exploring their potential differing applications in specific clinical scenarios.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT and pelvic mpMRI done from September 2021 to January 2022 at a single institution. The inclusion criteria were paired exams within a 3-month interval. Exclusion criteria were intervening treatment between exams, a change in PSA by more than 50% and absolute difference more than 1 ng/mL, or concurrent history of other malignancy. Abnormal lesions on these 2 imaging exams were reviewed with the identification of concordant and discordant imaging findings. The findings were verified by pathology or other imaging techniques within minimal 5-month clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 57 patients with 57 paired exams were included. The rate of concordant exams was 43/57 or 75.4%. Lesion-based analyses of sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for mpMRI and ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT in the prostate bed were 96%, 94%, 98%, 89% and 96%, 100%, 100%, 90% respectively. For pelvic lymph node metastases, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for mpMRI and ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT were 52%, 100%, 100%, 55% and 100%, 100%, 100%, 100% respectively. For bone metastases, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for mpMRI and ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT were 86%, 73%, 50%, 94% and 100%, 98%, 95%, 100% respectively. Exact McNemar's test for paired data suggested that in diagnostic performance between ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT and mpMRI was not statistically significant in prostate bed (p-value = 1.00), but significantly in pelvic lymph nodes (p-value < 0.0001) and bone lesions (p-value = 0.0026).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that PSMA-based ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT and pelvic mpMRI have a good concordance rate in the detection of primary or recurrence prostate disease and can have complementary roles in the clinical assessment of the prostate bed lesions. However, there are key differences in their performance, with the notably superior performance of PSMA-based ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT in the detection of small metastatic nodal disease and bone metastases.

PSMA-based 18F-DCFPyL PET: a better choice than multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis?

Owing to the high tissue contrast, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has already been the most widely applied imaging method for prostate cancer. Recently, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands for nuclear imaging are emerging as a promising modality in prostate cancer, especially since the 2 PET/CT agents (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 and ¹⁸F-DCFPy) approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, limited studies have performed the comparison of mpMRI versus recently approved ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT. In this issue of AJNMMI, Lu et al. compared the performance of ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT and pelvic mpMRI in intermediate-high risk and biochemical recurrent prostate cancer patients. The results demonstrated the two modalities have a good concordance rate for patient-based analysis, and ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT has a better diagnostic performance in detecting lymph node metastases and bone metastases for lesion-based analysis. The use of ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT provides more diagnostic confidence to better assess prostate cancer lesions.

The Role of PSMA PET/CT in the Primary Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Prostate Cancer-A Practical Clinical Review

Simple Summary

The combination of positron emission tomography (PET)-diagnostics with ligands binding to the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been a diagnostic milestone in the situation of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer and is gaining importance in primary diagnostics, providing a highly specific and sensitive diagnostic method in various clinical situations. However, the clinical application of this method requires a comprehensive knowledge of its advantages and disadvantages, potential pitfalls and influencing factors. This review aims to provide a practical clinical review of the currently available background data on PSMA PET/CT, as well as the clinical implications. Although a large amount of data already exist, a thorough analysis is complicated by study heterogeneity, showing the need for future systematic and prospective research.

Abstract

The importance of PSMA PET/CT in both primary diagnostics and prostate cancer recurrence has grown steadily since its introduction more than a decade ago. Over the past years, a vast amount of data have been published on the diagnostic accuracy and the impact of PSMA PET/CT on patient management. Nevertheless, a large heterogeneity between studies has made reaching a consensus difficult; this review aims to provide a comprehensive clinical review of the available scientific literature, covering the currently known data on physiological and pathological PSMA expression, influencing factors, the differences and pitfalls of various tracers, as well as the clinical implications in initial TNM-staging and in the situation of biochemical recurrence. This review has the objective of providing a practical clinical overview of the advantages and disadvantages of the examination in various clinical situations and the body of knowledge available, as well as open questions still requiring further research.

Feasibility of biology-guided radiotherapy using PSMA-PET to boost to dominant intraprostatic tumour

•

Biology-guided radiation therapy (BGRT) uses PET imaging for online image guidance.

•

PSMA PET uptake is abundant in the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL).

•

BgRT boost to PSMA-avid subvolume in the prostate region may be feasible.

•

Suitable targets for BgRT were identified in the ProPSMA clinical trial.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Role of molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer

Molecular imaging of prostate cancer continues to grow, with recent inclusion of several positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers into the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the US Food and Drug Administration approval of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiotracers. While much of the work for many of these radiotracers is focused on systemic staging and restaging in both newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer and biochemically recurrent disease patients, the potential role of molecular imaging for the detection of localized prostate cancer has not yet been fully established. The primary aim of this article will be to present the potential role for molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer and discuss potential advantages and disadvantages to utilization of both PET/computed tomography (CT) and PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for this clinical indication of use.

[Interdisciplinary expert consensus on innovations in imaging diagnostics and radionuclide-based therapies for advanced prostate cancer]

BACKGROUND

Numerous diagnostic and therapeutic innovations in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, both in the hormone-sensitive and in the castration-resistant situation, recently led to a new orientation in the management of this tumor. However, there are potential indications beyond the ones covered by the S3 guideline on early detection, diagnosis and therapy of prostate cancer in clinical care that might be helpful for patients.

OBJECTIVES

Since July 2018, an interdisciplinary group of experts from nuclear medicine, radiologists, radio-oncologists and urologists developed a consensus paper on state-of-the-art innovations in imaging diagnostics and radionuclide-based therapies for advanced prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Provided by the working group are suggestions and strategies to improve the implementation of new imaging techniques such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), PSMA-PET/CT (prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography) and innovative therapeutic options (radium-223 dichloride, lutetium-177-PSMA) in the complex treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).