1
|
Wehbe RM, Katsaggelos AK, Hammond KJ, Hong H, Ahmad FS, Ouyang D, Shah SJ, McCarthy PM, Thomas JD. Deep Learning for Cardiovascular Imaging: A Review. JAMA Cardiol 2023; 8:1089-1098. [PMID: 37728933 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.3142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Importance Artificial intelligence (AI), driven by advances in deep learning (DL), has the potential to reshape the field of cardiovascular imaging (CVI). While DL for CVI is still in its infancy, research is accelerating to aid in the acquisition, processing, and/or interpretation of CVI across various modalities, with several commercial products already in clinical use. It is imperative that cardiovascular imagers are familiar with DL systems, including a basic understanding of how they work, their relative strengths compared with other automated systems, and possible pitfalls in their implementation. The goal of this article is to review the methodology and application of DL to CVI in a simple, digestible fashion toward demystifying this emerging technology. Observations At its core, DL is simply the application of a series of tunable mathematical operations that translate input data into a desired output. Based on artificial neural networks that are inspired by the human nervous system, there are several types of DL architectures suited to different tasks; convolutional neural networks are particularly adept at extracting valuable information from CVI data. We survey some of the notable applications of DL to tasks across the spectrum of CVI modalities. We also discuss challenges in the development and implementation of DL systems, including avoiding overfitting, preventing systematic bias, improving explainability, and fostering a human-machine partnership. Finally, we conclude with a vision of the future of DL for CVI. Conclusions and Relevance Deep learning has the potential to meaningfully affect the field of CVI. Rather than a threat, DL could be seen as a partner to cardiovascular imagers in reducing technical burden and improving efficiency and quality of care. High-quality prospective evidence is still needed to demonstrate how the benefits of DL CVI systems may outweigh the risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramsey M Wehbe
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine & Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Aggelos K Katsaggelos
- Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Kristian J Hammond
- Department of Computer Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Ha Hong
- Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Faraz S Ahmad
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
- Center for Health Information Partnerships, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
- Center for Artificial Intelligence, Northwestern Medicine Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Chicago, Illinois
| | - David Ouyang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sanjiv J Shah
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
- Center for Artificial Intelligence, Northwestern Medicine Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Patrick M McCarthy
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
- Center for Artificial Intelligence, Northwestern Medicine Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Chicago, Illinois
| | - James D Thomas
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
- Center for Artificial Intelligence, Northwestern Medicine Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salih A, Boscolo Galazzo I, Gkontra P, Lee AM, Lekadir K, Raisi-Estabragh Z, Petersen SE. Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Cardiac Imaging: Toward More Interpretable Models. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2023; 16:e014519. [PMID: 37042240 DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.122.014519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence applications have shown success in different medical and health care domains, and cardiac imaging is no exception. However, some machine learning models, especially deep learning, are considered black box as they do not provide an explanation or rationale for model outcomes. Complexity and vagueness in these models necessitate a transition to explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods to ensure that model results are both transparent and understandable to end users. In cardiac imaging studies, there are a limited number of papers that use XAI methodologies. This article provides a comprehensive literature review of state-of-the-art works using XAI methods for cardiac imaging. Moreover, it provides simple and comprehensive guidelines on XAI. Finally, open issues and directions for XAI in cardiac imaging are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Salih
- William Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom (A.S., A.M.L., Z.R.-E., S.E.P.)
| | | | - Polyxeni Gkontra
- Department of de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, University of Barcelona, Spain (P.G., K.L.)
| | - Aaron Mark Lee
- William Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom (A.S., A.M.L., Z.R.-E., S.E.P.)
| | - Karim Lekadir
- Department of de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, University of Barcelona, Spain (P.G., K.L.)
| | - Zahra Raisi-Estabragh
- William Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom (A.S., A.M.L., Z.R.-E., S.E.P.)
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (Z.R.-E., S.E.P.)
| | - Steffen E Petersen
- William Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom (A.S., A.M.L., Z.R.-E., S.E.P.)
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (Z.R.-E., S.E.P.)
- Health Data Research UK, London (S.E.P.)
- Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom (S.E.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Singh A, Miller RJH, Otaki Y, Kavanagh P, Hauser MT, Tzolos E, Kwiecinski J, Van Kriekinge S, Wei CC, Sharir T, Einstein AJ, Fish MB, Ruddy TD, Kaufmann PA, Sinusas AJ, Miller EJ, Bateman TM, Dorbala S, Di Carli M, Liang JX, Huang C, Han D, Dey D, Berman DS, Slomka PJ. Direct Risk Assessment From Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Explainable Deep Learning. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2023; 16:209-220. [PMID: 36274041 PMCID: PMC10980287 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is frequently used to provide risk stratification, but methods to improve the accuracy of these predictions are needed. OBJECTIVES The authors developed an explainable deep learning (DL) model (HARD MACE [major adverse cardiac events]-DL) for the prediction of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and validated its performance in large internal and external testing groups. METHODS Patients undergoing single-photon emission computed tomography MPI were included, with 20,401 patients in the training and internal testing group (5 sites) and 9,019 in the external testing group (2 different sites). HARD MACE-DL uses myocardial perfusion, motion, thickening, and phase polar maps combined with age, sex, and cardiac volumes. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality or nonfatal MI. Prognostic accuracy was evaluated using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS During internal testing, patients with normal perfusion and elevated HARD MACE-DL risk were at higher risk than patients with abnormal perfusion and low HARD MACE-DL risk (annualized event rate, 2.9% vs 1.2%; P < 0.001). Patients in the highest quartile of HARD MACE-DL score had an annual rate of death or MI (4.8%) 10-fold higher than patients in the lowest quartile (0.48% per year). In external testing, the AUC for HARD MACE-DL (0.73; 95% CI: 0.71-0.75) was higher than a logistic regression model (AUC: 0.70), stress total perfusion deficit (TPD) (AUC: 0.65), and ischemic TPD (AUC: 0.63; all P < 0.01). Calibration, a measure of how well predicted risk matches actual risk, was excellent in both groups (Brier score, 0.079 for internal and 0.070 for external). CONCLUSIONS The DL model predicts death or MI directly from MPI, by estimating patient-level risk with good calibration and improved accuracy compared with traditional quantitative approaches. The model incorporates mechanisms to explain to the physician which image regions contribute to the adverse event prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ananya Singh
- Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Robert J H Miller
- Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Yuka Otaki
- Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Paul Kavanagh
- Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michael T Hauser
- Department of Nuclear Cardiology, Oklahoma Heart Hospital, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Evangelos Tzolos
- Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Jacek Kwiecinski
- Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Serge Van Kriekinge
- Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Chih-Chun Wei
- Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tali Sharir
- Department of Nuclear Cardiology, Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Nuclear Cardiology, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheba, Israel
| | - Andrew J Einstein
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA; Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mathews B Fish
- Oregon Heart and Vascular Institute, Sacred Heart Medical Center, Springfield, Oregon, USA
| | - Terrence D Ruddy
- Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Philipp A Kaufmann
- Division of Cardiac Imaging, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Albert J Sinusas
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Edward J Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Sharmila Dorbala
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marcelo Di Carli
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joanna X Liang
- Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Cathleen Huang
- Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Donghee Han
- Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Damini Dey
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Daniel S Berman
- Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Piotr J Slomka
- Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Apostolopoulos ID, Papandrianos NI, Feleki A, Moustakidis S, Papageorgiou EI. Deep learning-enhanced nuclear medicine SPECT imaging applied to cardiac studies. EJNMMI Phys 2023; 10:6. [PMID: 36705775 PMCID: PMC9883373 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-022-00522-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) has a growing popularity and is a well-established method of artificial intelligence for data processing, especially for images and videos. Its applications in nuclear medicine are broad and include, among others, disease classification, image reconstruction, and image de-noising. Positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) are major image acquisition technologies in nuclear medicine. Though several studies have been conducted to apply DL in many nuclear medicine domains, such as cancer detection and classification, few studies have employed such methods for cardiovascular disease applications. The present paper reviews recent DL approaches focused on cardiac SPECT imaging. Extensive research identified fifty-five related studies, which are discussed. The review distinguishes between major application domains, including cardiovascular disease diagnosis, SPECT attenuation correction, image denoising, full-count image estimation, and image reconstruction. In addition, major findings and dominant techniques employed for the mentioned task are revealed. Current limitations of DL approaches and future research directions are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis D. Apostolopoulos
- grid.11047.330000 0004 0576 5395Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece ,grid.410558.d0000 0001 0035 6670Department of Energy Systems, University of Thessaly, Gaiopolis Campus, 41500 Larisa, Greece
| | - Nikolaos I. Papandrianos
- grid.410558.d0000 0001 0035 6670Department of Energy Systems, University of Thessaly, Gaiopolis Campus, 41500 Larisa, Greece
| | - Anna Feleki
- grid.410558.d0000 0001 0035 6670Department of Energy Systems, University of Thessaly, Gaiopolis Campus, 41500 Larisa, Greece
| | - Serafeim Moustakidis
- grid.410558.d0000 0001 0035 6670Department of Energy Systems, University of Thessaly, Gaiopolis Campus, 41500 Larisa, Greece ,AIDEAS OÜ, 10117 Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Elpiniki I. Papageorgiou
- grid.410558.d0000 0001 0035 6670Department of Energy Systems, University of Thessaly, Gaiopolis Campus, 41500 Larisa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|