1
|
Bao X, Li S, Yao S, Chen Q. Research process of PET tracers for neuroendocrine tumors diagnosis. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING 2025; 15:1-14. [PMID: 40124763 PMCID: PMC11929009 DOI: 10.62347/jxly1661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2025] [Accepted: 02/14/2025] [Indexed: 03/25/2025]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can affect several organ systems and present a variety of clinical symptoms, which are difficult to diagnose by conventional methods. Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) is a group of specific receptors expressed on the well-differentiated NET cell membrane. [68Ga]-labeled somatostatin analogues (SSAs) PET/CT, endogenous ligands targeting SSTR, is widely used in currently clinical NETs diagnosis. The dual-tracer strategy ([68Ga]Ga-SSAs + [18F]FDG) allows for a more detailed evaluation of tumor metabolism and receptor expression. The NETPET score, integrating [68Ga]Ga-SSAs PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT results, enhances the accuracy of predicting treatment response and prognosis. In addition, novel isotopes ([18F]/[64Cu]) labeled SSAs and SSTR antagonists outperformed [68Ga]-SSAs in lesion detection, tumor uptake, and tumor-to-background ratio. Due to undifferentiated or dedifferentiated NETs, SSTR may not be expressed. [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [18F]-FDG PET/CT are applicable for SSTR-negative NET diagnosis. [18F]-MFBG and [18F]-DOPA have a higher sensitivity for identifying non-metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) than other radiotracers. This review addressed NET diagnosis with conventional imaging techniques, the clinical application of novel radiotracers, and the merits and limitations of the various radiotracers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangyuan Bao
- Department of PET/CT Diagnostic, Tianjin Key Lab of Functional Imaging and Tianjin Institute of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjin 300052, China
- The Clinical Research and Translational Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityFuzhou 350005, Fujian, China
| | - Shuai Li
- Department of PET/CT Diagnostic, Tianjin Key Lab of Functional Imaging and Tianjin Institute of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjin 300052, China
| | - Shaobo Yao
- Department of PET/CT Diagnostic, Tianjin Key Lab of Functional Imaging and Tianjin Institute of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjin 300052, China
- The Clinical Research and Translational Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityFuzhou 350005, Fujian, China
| | - Qiusong Chen
- Department of PET/CT Diagnostic, Tianjin Key Lab of Functional Imaging and Tianjin Institute of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjin 300052, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nazar AK, Basu S. Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogs for Cancer Imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:914-940. [PMID: 39122608 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2024.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) are expressed by many tumours especially those related to neuro-endocrine origin and molecular functional imaging of SSTR expression using radiolabelled somatostatin analogs have revolutionized imaging of patients with these group of malignancies. Coming a long way from the first radiolabelled somatostatin analog 123I-Tyr-3-octreotide, there has been significant developments in terms of radionuclides used, the ligands and somatostatin derivatives. 111In-Pentetreotide extensively employed for imaging NETs at the beginning has now been replaced by 68Ga-SSA based PET-CT. SSA-PET/CT performs superior to conventional imaging modalities and has evolved in the mainframe for NET imaging. The advantages were multiple: (i) superior spatial resolution of PET versus SPECT, (ii) quantitative capabilities of PET aiding in disease activity and treatment response monitoring with better precision, (iii) shorter scan time and (iv) less patient exposure to radiation. The modality is indicated for staging, detecting the primary in CUP-NETs, restaging, treatment planning (along with FDG: the concept of dual-tracer PET-CT) as well as treatment response evaluation and follow-up of NETs. SSA PET/CT has also been incorporated in the guidelines for imaging of Pheochromocytoma-Paraganglioma, Medullary carcinoma thyroid, Meningioma and Tumor induced osteomalacia. At present, there is rising interest on (a) 18F-labelled SSA, (b) 64Cu-labelled SSA, and (c) somatostatin antagonists. 18F offers excellent imaging properties, 64Cu makes delayed imaging feasible which has implications in dosimetry and SSTR antagonists bind with the SST receptors with high affinity and specificity, providing high contrast images with less background, which can be translated to theranostics effectively. SSTR have been demonstrated in non-neuroendocrine tumours as well in the peer-reviewed literature, with studies demonstrating the potential of SSA PET/CT in Neuroblastoma, Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, carcinoma prostate (neuroendocrine differentiation) and lymphoma. This review will focus on the currently available SSAs and their history, different SPECT/PET agents, SSTR antagonists, comparison between the various imaging tracers, and their utility in both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aamir K Nazar
- Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Centre Annexe, Mumbai; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai
| | - Sandip Basu
- Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Centre Annexe, Mumbai; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu M, Ren C, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Huang Z, Jia R, Cheng Y, Bai C, Xu Q, Zhu W, Huo L. Evaluation of the safety, biodistribution, dosimetry of [ 18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 and head-to-head comparison with [ 68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: an interim analysis of a prospective trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:3719-3730. [PMID: 38878175 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06790-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 10/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE 18F-labelled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) analogs offer several advantages over 68Ga in terms of yield, cost, spatial resolution and detection rate. This study presents an interim analysis of a prospective trial designed to assess the safety, biodistribution and dosimetry of [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3, and compare its diagnostic efficacy and clinical management outcomes with [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE or [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-LM3 in patients with well-differentiated NETs. METHODS Twenty-one patients with histologically confirmed well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (G1 and G2) were prospectively recruited. The first eight patients underwent serial PET scans at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 injection to assess biodistribution and dosimetry. The remaining patients underwent whole-body PET/CT scans. [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT were done within a week, with a minimum 24-hour interval between the two scans. Focal uptake above the surrounding background activity and could not be explained by physiologic uptake was considered lesions of NETs. Lesion number, tumor uptake, and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) were compared. In patients with discrepant findings, the size of the smallest lesions (measured on coregistered CT) detected on [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 was compared. RESULTS [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 was safe and well-tolerated. Physiological uptake of [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 was significantly lower than that of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE in abdominal organs and bone marrow, but higher in blood pool and lung. The mean effective dose was 0.024 ± 0.014 mSv/MBq. [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 detected significantly more liver lesions (457 vs. 291, P = 0.006) and lymph node lesions (30 vs. 22, P = 0.011) compared to [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE. The tumor uptake was comparable, but TBR was significantly higher with [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 for lesions from all sites except for the duodenum. The size of the minimum liver lesions (0.54 ± 0.15 vs. 1.01 ± 0.49, P<0.001) and lymph node lesions (0.50 ± 0.19 vs. 1.26 ± 0.86, P = 0.024) detected on [18F]ALF-NOTA-LM3 were significantly smaller than those detected on [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE. CONCLUSION [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 shows favorable biodistribution, higher spatial resolution and superior performance than [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE in detecting liver and lymph node metastases, with higher TBR. Notably, it is the first SSTR analog to show superiority in detecting lymph node lesions when compared to [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06056362.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meixi Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Chao Ren
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Haiqiong Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Yuwei Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Zhenghai Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Ru Jia
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Yuejuan Cheng
- Department of Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Chunmei Bai
- Department of Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Qiang Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Wenjia Zhu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Li Huo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|