The prevalence of red cell antibodies in pregnancy correlated to the outcome of the newborn: a 12 year study in central Sweden

Maternal Steroid Hormone Levels in Early Pregnancy and Autism in the Offspring: A Population-Based, Nested Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

A role for prenatal steroid hormones in the etiology of autism has been proposed, but evidence is conflicting.

METHODS

Here, we examined serum levels of maternal estradiol, testosterone, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (OHP), and cortisol from the first trimester of gestation (mean = 10.1 weeks) in relation to the odds of diagnosed autism with and without co-occurring intellectual disability (ID) in the offspring (n = 118 autism with ID, n = 249 autism without ID, n = 477 control). Levels of maternal hormones were measured using highly sensitive liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, standardized according to gestational timing of sample collection, and analyzed with restricted cubic spline logistic regression models adjusting for child's sex and maternal health, demographic, and socioeconomic factors.

RESULTS

We observed significant nonlinear associations between maternal estradiol, 17-OHP, and cortisol with autism, which varied with the presence of co-occurring ID. Compared to mean levels, lower levels of estradiol were associated with higher odds of autism with ID (odds ratio for concentrations 1 SD below the mean = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.24-2.11), while higher cortisol levels were associated with lower odds (odds ratio for 1 SD above the mean = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36-0.88). In contrast, higher 17-OHP was associated with increased odds of autism without ID (odds ratio for 1 SD above the mean = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.11-1.99). We observed no evidence for interaction with sex of the child.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the notion that the maternal steroid hormonal environment in early pregnancy may contribute to autism, but also emphasize the complex relationship between early-life steroid exposure and autism.

Anti-D immunization after D positive platelet transfusions in D negative recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anti-D can be formed after D-incompatible platelet transfusions due to contaminating D+ red blood cells. These antibodies are of particular importance in women of childbearing potential, because anti-D is most often involved in severe cases of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. This systematic review determined the frequency of anti-D after D+ platelet transfusions and risk factors for D alloimmunization.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Relevant literature was searched using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science until December 2022. Overall anti-D frequency and risk factors were estimated using a random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In 22 studies, a total of 3028 D- patients received a mean of six D+ platelet transfusions. After a mean follow-up of seven months 106 of 2808 eligible patients formed anti-D. The pooled anti-D frequency was 3.3% (95% CI 2.0-5.0%; I2 71%). After including only patients with an undoubtable follow-up of at least 4 weeks, 29 of 1497 patients formed anti-D with a pooled primary anti-D rate of 1.9% (95% CI 0.9-3.2%, I2 44%). Women and patients receiving whole blood derived platelets had two and five times higher anti-D rates compared with men and patients receiving apheresis derived platelets, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Anti-D immunization is low after D incompatible platelet transfusions and dependent on recipients' sex and platelet source. We propose anti-D prophylaxis in girls and women, capable of becoming pregnant in the future, that received D+ platelets, regardless of platelet source, to reduce the risk of anti-D induced hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

Red Blood Cell Alloimmunization in Pregnancy: A Review of the Pathophysiology, Prevalence, and Risk Factors

This review paper provides an overview of the risk factors and laboratory testing for red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization in pregnancy. RBC alloimmunization is a significant medical issue that can cause haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), leading to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Current HDFN prophylaxis targets only Rhesus D (RhD) alloimmunization, with no effective measures to prevent alloimmunization to other RBC antigen groups. Several factors can increase the risk of developing RBC alloimmunization during pregnancy, including fetomaternal haemorrhage, RBC and maternal genetic status, and previous transfusions. Identifying these risk factors is essential to execute the appropriate management strategies to minimize the risk of HDFN. The review also discusses the laboratory methods and overview of pregnancy management. The paper highlights the importance of identifying and managing the risk factors for RBC alloimmunization in pregnancy to minimize the risk of HDFN and improve neonatal outcomes.

Neonatal hemolytic disease: How should we use indirect and direct antiglobulin tests?

BACKGROUND

In newborns with hemolysis, the direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) play a key role in demonstrating the presence of an immune cause. We aimed to emphasize the importance of IAT in mothers of DAT-positive babies.

METHODS

DAT was performed with forward blood grouping on cord blood in term babies who were born between September 2020 and September 2022. IAT was performed in the mothers of the babies who were found to have a positive DAT and antibody identification was performed in the mothers who were found to have a positive IAT. Specific antibodies detected and identified were associated with the clinical course.

RESULTS

The study included 2769 babies and their mothers. The prevalence of DAT positivity was found to be 3.3% (87 of 2661). In DAT-positive babies, the rate of ABO incompatibility was 45.9%, the rate of RhD incompatibility was 5.7% and the rate of RhD and ABO incompatibility in association was 10.3%. The rate of subgroup incompatibility and other red blood cell antibodies was 18.3%. Phototherapy was applied because of indirect hyperbilirubinemia in 16.6% of the DAT-negative babies and in 51.5% of the DAT-positive babies. The need for phototherapy was significantly higher in DAT-positive infants (p < 0.01). Severe hemolytic disease of the newborn, bilirubin level, duration of phototherapy and use of intravenous immunoglobulin were found to be significantly higher in the babies whose mothers were IAT positive compared with the babies whose mothers were IAT negative (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

IAT should be performed on all pregnant women. When screening with IAT is not performed during pregnancy, performing DAT in the baby plays a key role. We showed that the clinical course was more severe when mothers of DAT-positive babies were IAT positive.

Alloimmunization to Rh Antigen (D, C, E, C, E) Among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Care in South Western Uganda

INTRODUCTION

Maternal red cell alloimmunization to Rh antigen in pregnant women occurs when the immune system is sensitized by foreign red blood cell surface antigens, in this case fetal red blood cells, inducing an immune response. Various antigens of blood group systems may cause alloimmunization, especially the Rh, Kel, Fy, JK, and MNS systems. This study aimed to determine alloimmunization to the different frequencies of Rh antigen among pregnant women in South Western Uganda.

METHODS

A total of 1369 pregnant women consented and were recruited into a cross-sectional study during their regular antenatal visits during the period August 2020 to July 2021. Samples (4 mL) of anticoagulated and coagulated blood were obtained, and Rh blood grouping including Rh antigen and the indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) was carried out using the agglutination technology of the LISS ID-Card technique in the Ortho Biovue ID-Micro Typing System.

RESULTS

Out of 1369 participants recruited to the study, 78 (5.7%) were D-, 1291 were D+, and 134 (9.8%) had alloantibodies. Among those with alloantibodies, 115 (85.8%) were D+ and 19 (14.2%) D-. The percentage alloimmunization according to the Rh antigens was highest in e (9.72%), c (2.48%), C (2.34%) and E (0.94%) antigens. With the ABO system, alloimmunization was highest in blood group B (10.7%), followed by A (10.6%), O (9.2%) and then AB (7.1%). Alloimmunization was more prevalent in D- (24%) than in D+ participants (8.9%). Rhesus antigen e was the most prevalent antigen (99.8%), followed by c. The alloimmunization rate of 9.8% among these participants is high, and appears in both D+ and D- women. The other Rhesus antigens are seen to cause alloimmunization, with antigen e causing the highest prevalence. In conclusion, there is a need to identify antibodies and study the outcome for clinical significance, especially in D+ women, to facilitate proper pregnancy management.

It is about who you know (and how you help them): Insights from staff and donors about how to recruit and retain a panel of committed anti-D donors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Maintaining a panel of committed anti-D donors is crucial for the production of anti-D immunoglobulin to prevent haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn. Given low numbers of donors in the Australian panel, there is a need to better understand motivators and barriers specific to anti-D donors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A qualitative approach was used to gather perspectives of staff and current anti-D donors in Australia. Focus groups were held with staff involved with the anti-D programme. An asynchronous online discussion forum and interviews were conducted with donors. All data were coded using deductive and inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Staff stressed the importance of recruiting donors who met their own informal criteria as well as the formal selection criteria in order to maximize the chances of donors committing to making regular plasma donations. In contrast, donors were motivated by having a personal connection to anti-D, the recipient group and being eligible to join the programme. Support from staff and understanding the value of their donations also helped donors overcome concerns about the risks of joining the programme and reduced barriers to remaining in the programme.

CONCLUSION

Anti-D donors in Australia are motivated by multiple factors, including knowing who the recipient is, and dedicated staff are integral to building donors' commitment through education and support. Findings suggest the current approach to recruitment could be broadened to include all donors who meet formal selection criteria, with retention enhanced by reinforcing and rewarding the motives identified by donors for donating.

Non-Invasive Prenatal Fetal Blood Group Genotype and Its Application in the Management of Hemolytic Disease of Fetus and Newborn: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hemolytic disease of fetus and newborn (HDFN) imposes great healthcare burden being associated with maternal alloimmunization against parental-inherited fetal red blood cell antigens causing fetal anemia or death. Noninvasive prenatal analysis (NIPT) provides safe fetal RHD genotyping for early identification of risk pregnancies and proper management guidance. We aimed to conduct systematic review and meta-analysis on NIPT's beneficial application, in conjunction with quantitative maternal alloantibody analysis, for early diagnosis of pregnancies at risk. Search for relevant articles was done in; PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Ovid (January 2006April 2020), including only English-written articles reporting reference tests and accuracy data. Nineteen eligible studies were critically appraised. NIPT was estimated highly sensitive/specific for fetal RHD genotyping beyond 11-week gestation. Amplifications from ≥2 exons are optimum to increase accuracy. NIPT permits cost-effectiveness, precious resources sparing, and low emotional stress. Knowledge of parental ethnicity is important for correct NIPT result interpretations and quantitative screening. Cut-off titer ≥8-up-to-32 is relevant for anti-D alloantibodies, while, lower titer is for anti-K. Alloimmunization is influenced by maternal RHD status, gravida status, and history of adverse obstetrics. In conclusion, NIPT allows evidence-based provision of routine anti-D immunoprophylaxis and estimates potential fetal risks for guiding further interventions. Future large-scale studies investigating NIPT's non-RHD genotyping within different ethnic groups and in presence of clinically significant alloantibodies are needed.

Impact of red blood cell alloimmunization on fetal and neonatal outcomes: A single center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Alloimmunization can impact both the fetus and neonate.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

(a) calculate the incidence of clinically significant RBC isoimmunization during pregnancy, (b) review maternal management and neonatal outcomes, (c) assess the value of prenatal and postnatal serological testing in predicting neonatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective audit of consecutive alloimmunized pregnancies was conducted. Data collected included demographics, clinical outcomes, and laboratory results. Outcomes included: incidence of alloimmunization; outcomes for neonates with and without the cognate antigen; and sensitivity and specificity of antibody titration testing in predicting hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN).

RESULTS

Over 6 years, 128 pregnant women (0.4%) were alloimmunized with 162 alloantibodies; anti-E was the most common alloantibody (51/162; 31%). Intrauterine transfusions (IUTs) were employed in 2 (3%) of 71 mothers of cognate antigen positive (CoAg+) neonates. Of 74 CoAg+ neonates, 58% required observation alone, 23% intensive phototherapy, 9% top up transfusion, and 3% exchange transfusion; no fetal or neonatal deaths occurred. HDFN was diagnosed in 28% (21/74) of neonates; anti-D was the most common cause. The sensitivity and specificity of the critical gel titer >32 in predicting HDFN were 76% and 75%, respectively (negative predictive value 95%; positive predictive value 36%). The sensitivity and specificity of a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) in predicting HDFN were 90% and 58%, respectively (NPV 97%; PPV 29%).

CONCLUSION

Morbidity and mortality related to HDFN was low; most alloimmunized pregnancies needed minimal intervention. Titers of >32 by gel warrant additional monitoring during pregnancy.

Rhesus-minus phenotype as a predictor of sexual desire and behavior, wellbeing, mental health, and fecundity

Background

Since its discovery in the 1930s, the effects of Rh phenotype on human health and wellbeing, with the exception of the effects of Rh-negativity of a mother on the risk of hemolytic anemia of Rh-positive children, has only rarely been studied. In the last few years, however, several studies have shown that Rh-negative subjects have worse health and performance in certain tests than their Rh-positive peers. Nothing is known about the effect of Rh phenotype on the quality of life of subjects as measured by a standard instrument.

Methods

We hereby analyzed the data of 1768 male (24% Rh-negative) and 3759 female participants (23% Rh-negative) of an anonymous internet study using the partial Kendall test with the age and the population of the hometown of subjects controlled.

Results

The results showed that the Rh-negative women, but not men, scored worse in wellbeing measured with the WHO-BREFF. The Rh-negative men scored worse in mental health-related variables and in their reported economic situation and the Rh-negative women scored better in physical health-related variables. Both the Rh-negative men and women reported higher sexual activity than their Rh-positive peers.

Conclusions

The effects of the Rh phenotype were significant after the correction for multiple tests. However, they were usually weaker and less numerous than those of smoking, consuming alcohol, and high body mass index, which were used as a sort of internal control.

Maternal RhD heterozygous genotype is associated with male biased secondary sex ratio

BACKGROUND

Previous studies suggest that RhD positive heterozygotes express better health status than RhD positive homozygotes and especially RhD negative subjects. This also applies to pregnant women. According to the Trivers-Willard hypothesis, women in better physical condition should have more sons.

AIM

To test the hypothesis that RhD positive heterozygous mothers have a male-skewed sex ratio.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study. The data was analysed using Chi-Square test for all women, separately for RhD positive and RhD negative women, and separately for primiparous and multiparous women. The effects of maternal weight as a continuous predictor and the RhD phenotype of newborn as a categorical predictor of newborn sex were evaluated by the generalized linear model (GLZ) separately for RhD positive and RhD negative women using binomial distribution and logit link function.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical records comprised maternal weight before pregnancy, number of previous deliveries, sex of the newborn, maternal RhD phenotype, and RhD phenotype of the newborn.

SUBJECTS

We analysed data from 5655 women who gave birth between 2008 and 2012 in General University Hospital in Prague.

RESULTS

Secondary sex ratio was significantly higher (P = 0.028) in RhD positive mothers who had RhD negative newborns, i.e., in heterozygotes (SR = 1.23), than in RhD positive mothers who had RhD positive newborns, i.e., in a mixed population of heterozygotes and homozygotes (SR = 1.00), especially in primiparous women (P = 0.013; SR = 1.37 and 0.99 resp.).

CONCLUSION

The sex ratio at birth was significantly higher in RhD positive mothers who had RhD negative newborns than in RhD positive mothers who had RhD positive newborns.

Prevalence and obstetric outcome of women with red cell antibodies in pregnancy at the Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, West Yorkshire, England

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of red cell antibodies in pregnancy varies with ethnicity and geographical location, while the obstetric outcome depends on the available standard of care. Despite being the tertiary fetal medicine centre in West Yorkshire, the prevalence of red cell antibodies, and the outcome of pregnancies associated with these antibodies at the Leeds University Teaching Hospitals Trust remains unreported. This article aims to provide this information for the purpose of patient education and counselling.

STUDY DESIGN

The data of pregnant women with red cell antibodies between January 2011 and December 2016 was obtained from the Trust's database and reconciled with the Fetal Medicine Unit records using Viewpoint©. Fetal anaemia requiring in utero transfusion (IUT) was defined as a Middle Cerebral Artery Peak Systolic Velocities ≥ 1.5multiple of the median expected for gestational age. The mean gestational age at delivery, and perinatal outcomes of the pregnancies were recorded.

RESULT

Overall, 398 of the 96, 692 pregnant women that were screened had red cell antibodies, giving a prevalence of 1: 242 pregnancies. The Anti- E and Anti-M antibodies were the most common (114 women; 28.6%, and 112 women; 28.1% respectively), but did not cause fetal anaemia in isolation, while anti-D alloimmunization was the predominant indication for in-utero transfusion (IUT). Anti-DE and anti-Kell antibodies had the highest mean number of transfusions per pregnancy. The mean gestational age at delivery was 34 ± 2weeks. Post-transfusion fetal demise was recorded in two hydropic fetuses, both at a gestational age of 25 weeks; giving a transfusion-related mortality rate of 2.5%.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of red cell antibodies at West Yorkshire is lower compared with reports from other Caucasian populations.Nevertheless, these antibodies are important causes of iatrogenic preterm delivery and fetal morbidity. The prognosis is however good with prompt diagnosis and management.

RBC alloantibody prevalence and specificity in a Western Norwegian tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Although several studies focus on red blood cell (RBC) alloantibody distribution in selected patient populations, few address the specificity and frequency in all relevant groups. This study reports alloantibody frequency, distribution and the relationship to age and gender in blood donors, pregnant women and potential recipients of blood products.

METHODS

This historical cohort study included 55 462 consecutive antibody screening tests from a tertiary Western Norwegian Hospital. Descriptive statistics were performed, and the results were compared with the literature.

RESULTS

The detection and immunisation frequency for the whole cohort were 0·39 and 0·51%, respectively, whereas the RBC alloantibody prevalence was 0·73%. The most frequent RBC alloantibodies were anti-E (20·1%), anti-M (18·7%), anti-K (9·8%), anti-D (8·9%) and anti-Fy(a) (7·0%). In pregnant women, the most frequent RBC alloantibodies were anti-M, anti-D and anti-Le(a) (20·8, 18·9 and 18·9%, respectively), whereas there was no anti-K detected. Anti-E and anti-M were the dominating RBC alloantibodies in the pre-transfusion testing of in-hospital patients (24·1 and 17·1%, respectively). Eighteen (9·2%) persons in the total cohort had two RBC alloantibodies, six persons had three alloantibodies, and two persons had four alloantibodies. Rh and K typing to prevent future immunisations was only performed in 21·0% of the individuals who presented with a new alloantibody; despite that, 50·5% of the detected alloantibodies had such specificities.

CONCLUSIONS

The immunisation frequency and the level of anti-K are low compared to national and international studies. Rh and K phenotype-matched blood transfusions might be a feasible future strategy to further decrease RBC alloantibodies.

The incidence and outcome of clinically significant antibodies detected in Rhesus-D positive pregnant women of the Northern Territory

BACKGROUND

Haemolytic disease of the fetus/newborn secondary to clinically significant non-Rhesus-D antibodies has risen in importance since the advent of immunoprophylactic anti-D administration to Rhesus-D negative women. Of interest is the incidence of these antibodies in Rhesus-D positive women, who receive less frequent antenatal alloantibody screening. This is of particular concern if the antibodies arise late in pregnancy and may go undetected.

AIMS

To assess the proportion of Rhesus-D positive pregnant women with late developing clinically significant antibodies for haemolytic disease of the fetus/newborn, and whether these resulted in adverse fetal outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis over a 12-month period at a tertiary hospital in the Northern Territory. Group and antibody screen results in addition to clinical data regarding pregnancy/newborn were collected.

RESULTS

Sixty-four of 2612 women (2.5%) had red blood cell antibodies detected during their pregnancy. Of these, 21 clinically significant antibodies were detected in 19 women (0.7% of initial cohort). The most common antibody detected was anti-c (28.5%). In six of these women (0.23% of initial cohort), the antibodies were late developing. Mild jaundice was noted in three newborns with phototherapy required in one.

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinically significant antibodies were detected during pregnancy, and in a small proportion of cases as a late developing antibody undetected in the first trimester screening, clinical outcomes for the newborn were mild. As such, the cost of retesting all Rhesus-D positive pregnant women in the third trimester would be considerable and unlikely to result in any meaningful clinical benefit.

Therapeutic Apheresis in Hematologic, Autoimmune and Dermatologic Diseases With Immunologic Origin

The process of curing a patient by removing his illness by extracting blood is a very old one. Many years ago, phlebotomy was practiced to cure illness. Now, this old process, placed on a rational basis with therapeutic apheresis (TA), is being followed in clinical practice. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) with hollow fiber modules has been used in different severe diseases for more than 40 years. Based on many years of experience with the extracorporeal circulation in end-stage renal disease, the authors herein give an overview of TA in immunological diseases, especially in hematologic, autoimmune and dermatologic diseases. Updated information on immunology and molecular biology of different immunological diseases is discussed in relation to the rationale for apheresis therapy and its place in combination with other modern therapies. With the introduction of novel and effective biologic agents, TA is indicated only in severe cases, such as in rapid progression despite immunosuppressive therapy and/or biologic agents. In mild forms of autoimmune disease, treatment with immunosuppressive therapies and/or biologic agents seems to be sufficient. The prognosis of autoimmune diseases with varying organ manifestations has improved in recent years, due in part to very aggressive therapy schemes. For the immunological diseases that can be treated with TA, the guidelines of the German Working Group of Clinical Nephrology and of the Apheresis Applications Committee of the American Society for Apheresis are cited. TA has been shown to effectively remove the autoantibodies from blood and lead to rapid clinical improvement.

Prevalence, Specificity and Titration of Red Cell Alloantibodies in Multiparous Antenatal Females at a Tertiary Care Centre from North India

Screening and detection of clinically significant antibodies among antenatal women plays an important role in transfusion safety and preventing hemolytic disease of fetus and newborn. Routine screening of antenatal women for antibodies is not done in all blood centres of our country and so immunization rates are not known in pregnant women. We studied the prevalence of alloantibodies and titration of Anti D among antenatal multiparous women in Jammu region. In present prospective study, 750 antenatal multiparous women attending antenatal clinics were typed for ABO and D antigens. Alloantibody screening was done, if positive, specificity of alloantibody was ascertained by using commercially available red cell panel by tube method. Rate of alloimmunization was correlated with Rh D status, gravida, previous transfusion history and bad obstetric history. Titration of alloantibody D was done in first and third trimester of pregnancy. In present study most common blood group detected was B positive (38.4 %). Rh D negative cases constituted 7.6 % of total cases. Rate of alloimmunization was 2 %. A significant correlation was seen between Rh D-negative and alloimmunization (21 % in D-negative and 0.45 % in D-positive). There is significant increasing degree of alloimmunization with increase in Gravida. Alloimmunization in females with bad obstetric history was high (4.41 %) as compared to females with no bad obstetric history showing only 1.76 %. Alloantibodies detected were Anti-D, Anti-E, Anti-C and Anti-K. Anti-D constituted 80 % of all alloantibodies detected. Six women in their third trimester had raised titers of anti-D. Most common alloantibody detected was anti-D (80 %). Alloantibodies to other Rh antigens and Kell blood group systems were also identified. To minimize alloimmunization in Rh D negative women, proper Anti D immunoprophylaxis should be implemented.

Red cell alloimmunization in RhD positive pregnant women and neonatal outcome

The frequency of red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization in RhD positive pregnant women is not known in our population. We planned to determine its frequency and correlation with neonatal outcome. We included 1000 RhD positive pregnant women: 500 had 'normal pregnancy' (Group I) and another 500 had 'high risk pregnancy' (Group II). ABO and extended Rh phenotyping were done by tube technique, antibody screening and identification by gel technique. For alloimmunized women, the paternal and neonatal ABO and extended Rh typing were done. Neonatal direct antiglobulin test (DAT) was also done and their clinical outcome observed. The frequency of RBC alloimmunization was 0.7% (7/1000) and all these women were from group II (p = 0.015). The alloantibodies were anti-E (85.7%), anti-c (71.4%), anti-Cw (14.3%) and anti-S (14.3%). Also, 6 women had history of transfusion (p < 0.01). Of the 7 neonates born to alloimmunized mothers, 4 (57.14%) had a positive DAT. The mean duration of phototherapy was higher in the DAT positive neonates (p < 0.01) and 2 (50%) required exchange transfusion. Thus, the frequency of alloimmunization was 0.7% in RhD positive pregnant women. High risk pregnancies and antenatal patients having a history of blood transfusion should be considered for regular antibody screening.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: managing the mother, fetus, and newborn

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) affects 3/100 000 to 80/100 000 patients per year. It is due to maternal blood group antibodies that cause fetal red cell destruction and in some cases, marrow suppression. This process leads to fetal anemia, and in severe cases can progress to edema, ascites, heart failure, and death. Infants affected with HDFN can have hyperbilirubinemia in the acute phase and hyporegenerative anemia for weeks to months after birth. The diagnosis and management of pregnant women with HDFN is based on laboratory and radiographic monitoring. Fetuses with marked anemia may require intervention with intrauterine transfusion. HDFN due to RhD can be prevented by RhIg administration. Prevention for other causal blood group specificities is less studied.

Comparison of the direct antiglobulin test and the eluate technique for diagnosing haemolytic disease of the newborn

Objective

The direct antiglobulin test (DAT) is an important tool for identification of haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) caused by erythrocyte immunization. Although this test has been used for decades, accurate insights into its diagnostic properties and optimal use in the diagnosis of HDN are limited. We aimed to gain more insight into the diagnostic properties of the DAT for HDN by comparing it with erythrocyte eluate screening.

Design and methods

DAT and erythrocyte eluate screening was performed in umbilical cord blood of neonates obtained from 317 consecutive deliveries. Clinical jaundice was scored 4–6 days after delivery for the determination of HDN.

Results

In 21 neonates a positive DAT and in 61 neonates a positive eluate screening was found, while only 4 cases of HDN were observed. For the overall population the positive predictive value (PPV) and specificity of the DAT for HDN were 10% and 93% respectively and in the population of neonates with abnormal post-partum jaundice population the PPV and specificity were both 100%. The DAT missed two cases of HDN. These missed cases were, however, positive in the erythrocyte eluate screening.

Conclusion

The detection of clinically irrelevant ABO immunization limits the specificity of the DAT and eluate for HDN in ABO-incompatible pregnancies. For optimal use, the DAT should be requested only in cases of jaundice and be interpreted in the context of ABO-incompatibility. Finally, a negative DAT does not rule out HDN. When clinical suspicion is high, an eluate should be added following a negative DAT.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn due to multiple maternal antibodies

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine whether women with combinations of red blood cell antibodies are more likely to develop significant hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn than those with single antibodies.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective exposure cohort study was conducted of pregnant women with red blood cell antibodies. The development of significant hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn was then compared between patients with single antibodies and those with multiple antibodies. Data analysis was limited to pregnancies delivering since the year 2000.

RESULTS

Thirteen percent of the patients referred to our program had multiple red blood cell antibodies. Odds of developing significant hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn for patients with anti-Rh(D) combined with at least 1 additional red blood cell antibody were 3.65 times the odds for women with anti-Rh(D) antibodies in isolation (95% confidence interval, 1.84-7.33). In the setting of multiple antibodies including anti-Rh(D), Rh-positive fetuses/neonates have an increased odds of developing significant hemolytic disease even if the fetus is negative for the other corresponding red blood cell antigen.

CONCLUSION

Women with multiple red blood cell antibodies are more likely to develop significant hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn than those with a single antibody especially in the presence of anti-(Rh)D. This pathophysiology may suggest a more aggressive immune response in women who develop more than 1 red blood cell antibody.

Haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn

Haemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn (HDFN) is caused by maternal alloimmunization against red blood cell antigens. In severe cases, HDFN may lead to fetal anaemia with a risk for fetal death and to severe forms of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia with a risk for kernicterus. Most severe cases are caused by anti-D, despite the introduction of antental and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis. In general, red blood cell antibody screening programmes are aimed to detect maternal alloimmunization early in pregnancy to facilitate the identification of high-risk cases to timely start antenatal and postnatal treatment. In this review, an overview of the clinical relevance of red cell alloantibodies in relation to occurrence of HDFN and recent views on prevention, screening and treatment options of HDFN are provided.

Associations of Rhesus and non-Rhesus maternal red blood cell alloimmunization with stillbirth and preterm birth

BACKGROUND

Although the risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with anti-D antibodies are well-recognized, much less is known concerning alloimmunization with other red blood cell antibodies detected during routine maternal screening. To date, most reports of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with non-anti-D antibodies have been from small case studies. The aim of this study was to examine the associations of maternal alloimmunization with specific red blood cell antibodies and the risks of preterm birth and stillbirth in the Swedish population.

METHODS

All antibody screening, outcome and covariate data were obtained through linkages of Swedish national health and data registers. Follow-up in these population-based registers was available up to 31 December 2002. The final study sample consisted of 1,022,569 singleton births from 668,952 mothers during 1987-2002.

RESULTS

In total, 1.3% of the 1,022,569 study pregnancies were alloimmunized. In adjusted logistic regression models, compared with having no antibodies, alloimmunization with anti-D, anti-E, anti-C and anti-c was associated with increased risk of both stillbirth and preterm birth. In addition, anti-Kell was associated with increased risk of preterm birth and anti-Lea with increased risk of stillbirth. Compared with firstborn children, risk of preterm birth associated with alloimmunization was greater in subsequent births

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest study to date, alloimmunization with Rhesus, K- and -Lea red blood cell antibodies increased the risk of preterm birth and/or stillbirth. The association of anti-Lea with stillbirth was an unexpected finding. Further study of the consequences of non-anti-D alloimmunization is warranted.

Serologic and molecular investigations of DAR1 (weak D Type 4.2), DAR1.2, DAR1.3, DAR2 (DARE), and DARA

BACKGROUND

The partial D variant DAR1 (weak D Type 4.2) is caused by three single-point mutations, 602C>G, 667T>G, and 1025T>C. Here we report a molecular study on different D variants belonging to the DAR category (DAR1, DAR1.2, DAR1.3, and DAR2) and their serologic data.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 42 samples belonging to the DAR category were screened for the presence of the silent mutations 744C>T and 957G>A. The samples were phenotyped for RhD and RhCE, characterized for RhD epitope expression, and sequenced for RHD exons. Flow cytometry was performed to determine RhD antigen density.

RESULTS

The silent mutation 744C>T was found in all six samples previously typed as RHD*DAR2 (602C>G, 667T>G, 957G>A, 1025T>C). In addition to the three nucleotide changes originally reported for the RHD*DAR1 allele, the silent mutations 744C>T and 957G>A were found in 14 of 16 samples previously typed as RHD*DAR1. In the remaining two samples one additional silent mutation, 744C>T, was found. Serologically the DAR1.2 and DAR1.3 samples analyzed in this study showed no distinct difference in their anti-D reaction pattern compared to each other. The anti-D reaction pattern of DARA/DAR2 showed some distinct differences compared to those of DAR1.2 and DAR1.3.

CONCLUSION

RHD*DARA and RHD*DAR2 are the same allele. Furthermore, the alleles RHD*DAR1.2 and RHD*DAR1.3 both exist; however, the silent mutation 957G>A (V319) showed no influence on the RhD phenotype.

The risk assessment study for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in a University Hospital in Turkey

Maternal red-cell alloimmunization occurs when a woman's immune system is sensitized to foreign red-blood cell surface antigens, leading to the production of alloantibodies. The resulting antibodies often cross the placenta during pregnancies in sensitized women and, if the fetus is positive for red-blood-cell surface antigens, this will lead to hemolysis of fetal red-blood cells and anemia. The most severe cases of hemolytic disease in the fetus and newborn baby are caused by anti-D, anti-c, anti-E and anti-K antibodies. There are limited data available on immunization rates in pregnant women from Turkey. The aim of the present study was to provide data on the frequency and nature of maternal RBC alloimmunization in pregnant women in a tertiary care hospital. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the indirect antiglobulin test results of Rh-negative pregnant women performed in our Blood Bank between 2006 and 2012. Indirect antiglobulin test positive women also underwent confirmatory antibody screening and identification. During the study period, 4840 women admitted to our antenatal clinics. With regards to the major blood group systems (ABO and Rh), the most common phenotype was O positive (38.67%). There were 4097 D-antigen-positive women (84.65%) and 743 women with D-antigen-negative phenotype (15.35%). The prevalence of alloimmunization was found to be 8.74% in D-antigen negative group. Despite prophylactic use of Rh immunglobulins, anti-D is still a common antibody identified as the major cause of alloimmunization in our study (anti-D antibody 68.57%, non-D antibody 31.42%). While alloimmunization rate to D antigen was 6.46%, non-D alloimmunization rate was 2.69% among Rh-negative pregnant women. Moreover, detailed identification facilities for antibodies other than anti-D are not available in most of centers across Turkey. However, large-scale studies on pregnant women need to be done in order to collect sufficient evidence to formulate guidelines and to define indications for alloantibody screening and identification.

Constructing a population-based research database from routine maternal screening records: a resource for studying alloimmunization in pregnant women

Background

Although screening for maternal red blood cell antibodies during pregnancy is a standard procedure, the prevalence and clinical consequences of non-anti-D immunization are poorly understood. The objective was to create a national database of maternal antibody screening results that can be linked with population health registers to create a research resource for investigating these issues.

Study Design and Methods

Each birth in the Swedish Medical Birth Register was uniquely identified and linked to the text stored in routine maternal antibody screening records in the time window from 9 months prior to 2 weeks after the delivery date. These text records were subjected to a computerized search for specific antibodies using regular expressions. To illustrate the research potential of the resulting database, selected antibody prevalence rates are presented as tables and figures, and the complete data (from more than 60 specific antibodies) presented as online moving graphical displays.

Results

More than one million (1,191,761) births with valid screening information from 1982–2002 constitute the study population. Computerized coverage of screening increased steadily over time and varied by region as electronic records were adopted. To ensure data quality, we restricted analysis to birth records in areas and years with a sustained coverage of at least 80%, representing 920,903 births from 572,626 mothers in 17 of the 24 counties in Sweden. During the study period, non-anti-D and anti-D antibodies occurred in 76.8/10,000 and 14.1/10,000 pregnancies respectively, with marked differences between specific antibodies over time.

Conclusion

This work demonstrates the feasibility of creating a nationally representative research database from the routine maternal antibody screening records from an extended calendar period. By linkage with population registers of maternal and child health, such data are a valuable resource for addressing important clinical questions, such as the etiological significance of non-anti-D antibodies.

The prevalence of irregular erythrocyte antibodies among antenatal women in Delhi

BACKGROUND

Universal screening of all antenatal women, including D antigen-positive pregnant ones, is mandatory in most developed countries. However, no guidelines on this issue are available for developing countries such as India. Furthermore, there is limited information on immunisation rates in pregnant women (D antigen-positive and D antigen-negative) from India. We, therefore, studied the prevalence of alloantibodies among multigravida women in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, carried out to detect the prevalence of alloantibodies among multigravida women in India, 3,577 multigravida women attending antenatal clinics were typed for ABO and D antigens and screened for alloantibodies by column agglutination technology. The medical history and detailed obstetric history of these women were reviewed and information recorded on any prior haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn among siblings and/or blood transfusions.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of alloantibodies in this study was 1.25%. There was a statistically significant difference between alloimmunisation rates in the D antigen-negative and D antigen-positive groups (10.7% versus 0.12%, respectively). Anti-D antibody contributed to 78.4% of total alloimmunisations in our study.

DISCUSSION

Anti-D was the most common culprit responsible for alloimmunisation. Other alloantibodies found included anti-C, anti-M, anti-S and anti-c. Large-scale population-based studies are required to assess the real magnitude of alloimmunisation in pregnant women in India.

Frequencies of maternal red blood cell alloantibodies in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

BACKGROUND

Alloantibodies of clinical importance can cause transfusion reactions or hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). The frequencies of these antibodies have not been reported in our locality.

AIMS

To determine the frequency of occurrence of alloantibodies among pregnant women in Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This is a prospective study, which was carried out in the Braithwaite Memorial Specialist Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Screening and identification of red blood cell alloantibodies was done on the sera of 500 pregnant women using the DiaMed, DiaCell, and DiaPanel reagents (Cressier, Switzerland). ABO and Rh blood groups were done using antisera bought from Biotec (Ipswich, UK).

RESULTS

Alloantibodies were identified in the serum of 17 of the 500 (3.4%) pregnant women. The specificity of the antibodies was as follows: anti-C 6 (1.2%), anti-E 3 (0.6%), anti-Jsb 3 (0.6%), and anti-K 5 (1.0%). No anti-D was identified despite 8.6% of the study population being Rhesus D (Rh D) negative. The distribution of the antibodies was found to be independent of the blood groups of the participants (χ(2) = 4.050, P = 0.670). Blood group O constituted the highest percentage (48.0%).

CONCLUSION

This study has identified the presence of non-Rh D antibodies to the proportion of 3.4%. Rh D antibody was absent in this population irrespective of the relatively high percentage of Rh D negative women. There is a need to determine the actual risk these antibodies may pose to the antenatal women and to include antibody screening and identification in routine antenatal care.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: Current trends and perspectives

The spectrum of hemolytic disease of the newborn has changed over the last few decades. With the implementation of Rhesus D immunoprophylaxis, hemolytic disease due to ABO incompatibility and other alloantibodies has now emerged as major causes of this condition. Though in developing countries, anti D is still a common antibody in pregnant women, many Asian countries have identified alloantibodies other than anti D as a cause of moderate-severe hemolytic disease. The most concerned fact is that, some of these have been described in Rh D positive women. It appears that universal antenatal screening in all pregnant women needs to be initiated, since Rh D positive women are just as likely as D negative women to form alloantibodies. Many developed nations have national screening programs for pregnant women. This is necessary to ensure timely availability of antigen negative blood and reduce effects on the newborn. Although universal screening seems justified, the cost and infrastructure required would be immense. Developing countries and under resourced nations need to consider universal antenatal screening and frame guidelines accordingly.

[Fetomaternal anti-RH3, -4 (anti-E and anti-c) rhesus isoimmunization: a case report]

Hemolytic disease of the newborn caused by maternal isoimmunization has been decreasing over the past 10 years because of prophylactic treatment with anti-RH1 (anti-D) immunoglobulin. Nevertheless, there is an increase in the incidence of both relative and absolute numbers of non-RH1 red-cell maternofetal isoimmunizations, essentially anti-RH4 (anti-c), anti-RH3 (anti-E), and anti-Kell. In 8 to 14% of cases, multispecificity antibodies are present, the most common combination being the association of anti-RH3 and -4. Despite absence of specific prophylactic therapy, anti-RH4 isoimmunization could be as severe as anti-RH1 ; as for anti-RH3, it is usually associated with mild to moderate clinical manifestations. Nevertheless, there are few publications on anti-RH3, -4 maternofetal isoimmunization with a bias toward the most severe cases being reported. We report here a case of nonsevere maternofetal anti-RH3, -4 isoimmunization complicated with severe hyperbilirubinemia and delayed profound anemia. Hyperbilirubinemia was controlled using intensive phototherapy. Although anemia was absent at birth, it appeared progressively with a nadir at 7.8 g/dL at 1-month postnatal age. Blood counts were monitored for 3 months but the patient did not require red blood cell transfusion. This report underlines the need for a prolonged and rigorous pediatric follow-up of children born in the context of maternofetal isoimmunization after the acute neonatal period. Furthermore, it stresses the necessity of DAT testing in all pregnant women, even those who are RH1-positive.

Six years' experience performing RHD genotyping to confirm D- red blood cell units in Germany for preventing anti-D immunizations

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell (RBC) units of D+ donors are falsely labeled D- if regular serologic typing fails to detect low D antigen expression or chimerism. The limitations of serology can be overcome by molecular typing.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In January 2002, we introduced a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay for RHD as a routine test for first-time donors who typed D- by serologic methods including the indirect antiglobulin test. Samples were tested in pools of 20 for the RHD-specific polymorphism in Intron 4. RHD alleles were identified by PCR and nucleotide sequencing.

RESULTS

Within 6 years, 46,133 serologically D- first-time donors were screened for the RHD gene. The prevalence of RHD gene carriers detected by this method was 0.21 percent. Twenty-three RHD alleles were found of which 15 were new. Approximately one-half of the RHD gene carriers harbored alleles expressing a DEL phenotype resulting in a prevalence of 0.1 percent.

CONCLUSION

The integration of RHD genotyping into the routine screening program was practical. We report 6 years' experience of this donor testing policy, which is not performed in most transfusion services worldwide. RBC units of donors with DEL phenotype have been reported to anti-D immunize D- recipients. We transferred those donors to the D+ donor pool with the rationale of preventing anti-D immunizations, especially dreaded in pregnancies. For each population, it will be necessary to adapt the RHD genotyping strategy to the spectrum of prevalent alleles.

Risk factors for the presence of non-rhesus D red blood cell antibodies in pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for the presence of non-rhesus D (RhD) red blood cell (RBC) antibodies in pregnancy. To generate evidence for subgroup RBC antibody screening and for primary prevention by extended matching of transfusions in women <45 years.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Nationwide evaluation of screening programme for non-RhD RBC antibodies.

POPULATION

CASES

consecutive pregnancies (n=900) with non-RhD immunisation identified from 1 September 2002 to 1 June 2003 and 1 October 2003 to 1 July 2004; controls (n=968): matched for obstetric caregiver and gestational age.

METHODS

Data collection from the medical records and/or from the respondents by a structured phone interview.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Significant risk factors for non-RhD immunisation in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Significant independent risk factors: history of RBC transfusion (OR 16.7; 95% CI: 11.4-24.6), parity (para-1 versus para-0: OR 1.3; 95% CI: 1.0-1.7; para-2 versus para-0: OR 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0-2.0; para >2 versus para-0: OR 3.2; 95% CI: 1.8-5.8), haematological disease (OR 2.1; 95% CI: 1.0-4.2), history of major surgery (OR 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1-1.8). For the clinically most important antibodies, anti-K, anti-c and other Rh-nonD-antibodies RBC transfusion was the most important risk factor, especially for anti-K (OR 96.4; 95%-CI: 56.6-164.1); 83% of the K-sensitised women had a history of RBC transfusion. Pregnancy-related risk factors were a prior male child (OR 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2-2.3) and caesarean section (OR 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-2.7).

CONCLUSIONS

RBC transfusion is by far the most important independent risk factor for non-RhD immunisation in pregnancy, followed by parity, major surgery and haematological disease. Pregnancy-related risk factors are a prior male child and caesarean section. Subgroup screening for RBC antibodies, with exclusion of RhD-positive para-0 without clinical risk factors, is to be considered. This approach will be equally sensitive in detecting severe Haemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn compared with the present RBC antibody screening programme without preselection. Primary prevention by extending preventive matching of transfusions in women younger than 45 will prevent more than 50% of pregnancy immunisations.

Effect of screening for red cell antibodies, other than anti-D, to detect hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: a population study in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is a severe disease, resulting from maternal red cell (RBC) alloantibodies directed against fetal RBCs. The effect of a first-trimester antibody screening program on the timely detection of HDFN caused by antibodies other than anti-D was evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Nationwide, all women (1,002 in 305,000 consecutive pregnancies during 18 months) with alloantibodies other than anti-D, detected by a first-trimester antibody screen, were included in a prospective index-cohort study. In a parallel-coverage validation study, patients with HDFN caused by antibodies other than anti-D, that were missed by the screening program, were retrospectively identified.

RESULTS

The prevalence of positive antibody screens at first-trimester screening was 1,232 in 100,000; the prevalence of alloantibodies other than anti-D was 328 in 100,000, of which 191 of 100,000 implied a risk for occurrence of HDFN because the father carried the antigen. Overall, severe HDFN, requiring intrauterine or postnatal (exchange) transfusions, occurred in 3.7 percent of fetuses at risk: for anti-K in 11.6 percent; anti-c in 8.5 percent; anti-E in 1.1 percent; Rh antibodies other than anti-c, anti-D, or anti-E in 3.8 percent; and for antibodies other than Rh antibodies or anti-K, in none of the fetuses at risk. All affected children, where antibodies were detected, were promptly treated and healthy at the age of 1 year. The coverage validation study showed a sensitivity of the screening program of 75 percent. Five of 8 missed cases were caused by anti-c, with delay-induced permanent damage in at least 1.

CONCLUSION

First-trimester screening enables timely treatment of HDFN caused by antibodies other than anti-D, however, with a sensitivity of only 75 percent. A second screening at Week 30 of c- women will enhance the screening program. Severe HDFN, caused by antibodies other than anti-D, is associated with anti-K, anti-c, and to a lesser extent with other Rh-alloantibodies.

Management of pregnancies complicated by anti-Fyaalloimmunization

BACKGROUND

The objective was to evaluate the management and outcome of patients with anti-Fy(a) at the Ohio State University.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A database search for patients with pregnancies complicated only by anti-Fy(a) from 1959 to 2004. Collected information included maternal testing, fetal therapy, and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

The final data set included 18 pregnancies in 15 women where anti-Fy(a) was the only maternal alloantibody present and the fetus was Fy(a) antigen-positive. Maternal antibody titers of at least 32 and optical density at 450 nm values in modified Liley Zone IIB or III identified all fetuses or neonates with significant hemolytic disease (2/18, 11%). No fetuses had hydrops, and there were no deaths attributed to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

CONCLUSION

Anti-Fy(a) has the potential to lead to significant fetal hemolysis. Management guidelines developed for D sensitization are appropriate for pregnancies complicated by anti-Fy(a) alloimmunization.

Transfusion-Related Risks of Intradermal Allogeneic Lymphocyte Immunotherapy: Single Cases in a Large Cohort and Review of the Literature

PROBLEM

Lymphocyte immunotherapy (LIT) is applied in infertility treatment. Moreover, it has been suggested for prevention of rhesus D-hemolytic disease and as a vaccine for reduction of human immunodeficiency virus-1 susceptibility. Although transfusion-related problems have been rarely reported they were a matter of debate. Here we discuss extensive single-center experience with intradermal LIT for implantation failure and recurrent miscarriages.

METHOD OF STUDY

Retrospective 2- to 3-year follow-up of in vitro fertilization couples treated during 1996-2002 (feedback 2,848/3,041 = 93%), registering 930 deliveries. Prospective survey for acute reactions for 2000-2003 (feedback 2,687/3,246 = 83%). Review of the literature.

RESULTS

Infections of the patient and transplant rejection later in life are minor residual risks. Post-transfusion purpura was suspected once but not verified. Anaphylaxis or malignancy were not promoted. Fetal/newborn alloimmune disease (severe hemolytic disease, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia) were not observed.

CONCLUSION

Based on microbiological, immunological, and hematological testing the risks of intradermal LIT are low.

Haemolytic disease of the newborn due to maternal irregular antibodies in the Chinese population in Taiwan

From 1991 to 2000, amongst 23,886 full-term healthy Chinese babies delivered at our hospital, 2615 babies developed neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia. After excluding other causes of hyperbilirubinaemia and identifying the irregular antibodies, 15 cases of haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) due to maternal irregular antibodies were diagnosed; three cases were born in our hospital and 12 cases were referred. Amongst these 15 babies, six cases had HDN due to anti-E, three cases due to anti-E + c, three cases due to anti-D, one case due to anti-c and two cases due to 'Mi' antibodies reacting with MiIII phenotype cells (anti-Hil and anti-Mur). Although there were four cases of hydrops fetalis, only one of the patients expired. The prevalence of HDN caused by maternal irregular antibodies has been estimated to be 0.01%. Therefore, routine prenatal screening for irregular antibodies was not rational in the Chinese population in Taiwan. Anti-E and anti-E + c were the important irregular antibodies resulting in HDN. Although few cases of HDN due to anti-'Mi' have been reported, Anti-'Mi' is significant in regions with a high prevalence of the MiIII phenotype.