Histological changes in the nasal mucosa in persons occupationally exposed to formaldehyde alone and in combination with wood dust

An updated mode of action and human relevance framework evaluation for Formaldehyde-Related nasal tumors

Formaldehyde is a reactive aldehyde naturally present in all plant and animal tissues and a critical component of the one-carbon metabolism pathway. It is also a high production volume chemical used in the manufacture of numerous products. Formaldehyde is also one of the most well-studied chemicals with respect to environmental fate, biology, and toxicology-including carcinogenic potential, and mode of action (MOA). In 2006, a published MOA for formaldehyde-induced nasal tumors in rats concluded that nasal tumors were most likely driven by cytotoxicity and regenerative cell proliferation, with possible contributions from direct genotoxicity. In the past 15 years, new research has better informed the MOA with the publication of in vivo genotoxicity assays, toxicogenomic analyses, and development of ultra-sensitive methods to measure endogenous and exogenous formaldehyde-induced DNA adducts. Herein, we review and update the MOA for nasal tumors, with particular emphasis on the numerous studies published since 2006. These new studies further underscore the involvement of cytotoxicity and regenerative cell proliferation, and further inform the genotoxic potential of inhaled formaldehyde. The data lend additional support for the use of mechanistic data for the derivation of toxicity criteria and/or scientifically supported approaches for low-dose extrapolation for the risk assessment of formaldehyde.

Evaluation of environmental impact on the formaldehyde emission and flame-retardant performance of thermal insulation materials

Thermal insulation material, an essential building material, is used to preserve heat or block heat gains in buildings. Insulation material is currently attracting significant attention, and thermal conductivity, i.e., thermal insulation performance, is expressed at a very low value. Therefore, since the era of industrialization, several chemicals have been used to secure thermal insulation performance in each sector; therefore, the resulting hazards have increased. To date, researches have been mainly conducted to secure the low thermal conductivity of insulating material; however, the hazards remain unaddressed. Therefore, this study quantitatively evaluates 18 building construction products and the emission of pollutants and harmful gas during combustion events. Pollutant emission was conducted using the 20-L small chamber method according to the ISO 16000, and formaldehyde, total volatile organic compounds, and five volatile organic compounds were analyzed. Gas hazard evaluation during combustion was evaluated by KS F 2271: Fire Retardant Testing Method of Interior Finishes and Structures as the average behavioral stop time of rats under thermal insulation combustion conditions.

Characteristics and health effects of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in an urban area in Iran

This study reports a spatiotemporal characterization of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in the summer and winter of 2017 in the urban area of Shiraz, Iran. Sampling was fulfilled according to EPA Method TO-11 A. The inverse distance weighting (IDW) procedure was used for spatial mapping. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to evaluate carcinogenic and non-cancer risk owing to formaldehyde and acetaldehyde exposure in 11 age groups. The average concentrations of formaldehyde/acetaldehyde in the summer and winter were 15.07/8.40 μg m-3 and 8.57/3.52 μg m-3, respectively. The formaldehyde to acetaldehyde ratios in the summer and winter were 1.80 and 2.43, respectively. The main sources of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were photochemical generation, vehicular traffic, and biogenic emissions (e.g., coniferous and deciduous trees). The mean inhalation lifetime cancer risk (LTCR) values according to the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) for formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in summer and winter ranged between 7.55 × 10-6 and 9.25 × 10-5, which exceed the recommended value by US EPA. The average LTCR according to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) for formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in summer and winter were between 4.82 × 10-6 and 2.58 × 10-4, which exceeds recommended values for five different age groups (Birth to <1, 1 to <2, 2 to <3, 3 to <6, and 6 to <11 years). Hazard quotients (HQs) of formaldehyde ranged between 0.04 and 4.18 for both seasons, while the HQs for acetaldehyde were limited between 0.42 and 0.97.

Effects of Formaldehyde on the Nasal Mucosa

To investigate health effects of long-term exposure to formaldehyde a cross-sectional field study was performed. Seventy formaldehyde-exposed workers were compared with a control group. A higher frequency of symptoms from upper and lower airways, headache, and dermal discomfort was found in the formaldehyde-exposed group. Further, formaldehyde-exposed workers showed disturbances of nasal physiologic conditions, such as slow nasal clearance, impairment of the sense of smell, more pronounced nasal mucosal swelling, and by spirometry lower forced vital capacity than expected was found. Nasal biopsies from the concha media showed more frequent histologic changes such as loss of cilia and metaplasia in the formaldehyde-exposed group. Histologic lesions did not correlate to current or cumulative exposure doses to formaldehyde. In an experimental study of Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to formaldehyde (12.7 mg/m3, 6 hours/day, 5 days/week for 24 months), one rat developed a squamous cell carcinoma in the nose and another nasal dysplasia and in seven other rats pronounced nasal metaplasia was seen in the nasal mucosa. In a control group of rats no significant histologic lesions were found.

Recent trend in risk assessment of formaldehyde exposures from indoor air

Studies about formaldehyde (FA) published since the guideline of 0.1 mg/m(3) by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2010 have been evaluated; critical effects were eye and nasal (portal-of-entry) irritation. Also, it was considered to prevent long-term effects, including all types of cancer. The majority of the recent toxicokinetic studies showed no exposure-dependent FA-DNA adducts outside the portal-of-entry area and FA-DNA adducts at distant sites were due to endogenously generated FA. The no-observed-adverse-effect level for sensory irritation was 0.5 ppm and recently reconfirmed in hypo- and hypersensitive individuals. Investigation of the relationship between FA exposure and asthma or other airway effects in children showed no convincing association. In rats, repeated exposures showed no point mutation in the p53 and K-Ras genes at ≤15 ppm neither increased cell proliferation, histopathological changes and changes in gene expression at 0.7 ppm. Repeated controlled exposures (0.5 ppm with peaks at 1 ppm) did not increase micronucleus formation in human buccal cells or nasal tissue (0.7 ppm) or in vivo genotoxicity in peripheral blood lymphocytes (0.7 ppm), but higher occupational exposures were associated with genotoxicity in buccal cells and cultivated peripheral blood lymphocytes. It is still valid that exposures not inducing nasal squamous cell carcinoma in rats will not induce nasopharyngeal cancer or lymphohematopoietic malignancies in humans. Reproductive and developmental toxicity are not considered relevant in the absence of sensory irritation. In conclusion, the WHO guideline has been strengthened.

Identifying an indoor air exposure limit for formaldehyde considering both irritation and cancer hazards

Formaldehyde is a well-studied chemical and effects from inhalation exposures have been extensively characterized in numerous controlled studies with human volunteers, including asthmatics and other sensitive individuals, which provide a rich database on exposure concentrations that can reliably produce the symptoms of sensory irritation. Although individuals can differ in their sensitivity to odor and eye irritation, the majority of authoritative reviews of the formaldehyde literature have concluded that an air concentration of 0.3 ppm will provide protection from eye irritation for virtually everyone. A weight of evidence-based formaldehyde exposure limit of 0.1 ppm (100 ppb) is recommended as an indoor air level for all individuals for odor detection and sensory irritation. It has recently been suggested by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the National Toxicology Program (NTP), and the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) that formaldehyde is causally associated with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and leukemia. This has led US EPA to conclude that irritation is not the most sensitive toxic endpoint and that carcinogenicity should dictate how to establish exposure limits for formaldehyde. In this review, a number of lines of reasoning and substantial scientific evidence are described and discussed, which leads to a conclusion that neither point of contact nor systemic effects of any type, including NPC or leukemia, are causally associated with exposure to formaldehyde. This conclusion supports the view that the equivocal epidemiology studies that suggest otherwise are almost certainly flawed by identified or yet to be unidentified confounding variables. Thus, this assessment concludes that a formaldehyde indoor air limit of 0.1 ppm should protect even particularly susceptible individuals from both irritation effects and any potential cancer hazard.

Non-cancer effects of formaldehyde and relevance for setting an indoor air guideline

There is considerable recent focus and concern about formaldehyde (FA). We have reviewed the literature on FA with focus on chemosensory perception in the airways and lung effects in indoor environments. Concentrations of FA, both personal and stationary, are on average in the order of 0.05 mg/m(3) or less in Europe and North America with the exception of new housing or buildings with extensive wooden surfaces, where the concentration may exceed 0.1 mg/m(3). With the eye the most sensitive organ, subjective irritation is reported at 0.3-0.5 mg/m(3), which is somewhat higher than reported odour thresholds. Objective effects in the eyes and airways occur around 0.6-1 mg/m(3). Dose-response relationships between FA and lung function effects have not been found in controlled human exposure studies below 1 mg/m(3), and epidemiological associations between FA concentrations and exacerbation of asthma in children and adults are encumbered by complex exposures. Neither experimental nor epidemiological studies point to major differences in susceptibility to FA among children, elderly, and asthmatics. People with personal trait of negative affectivity may report more symptoms. An air quality guideline of 0.1 mg/m(3) (0.08 ppm) is considered protective against both acute and chronic sensory irritation in the airways in the general population assuming a log normal distribution of nasal sensory irritation.

Commentary: mechanistic considerations for associations between formaldehyde exposure and nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Occupational exposure to formaldehyde has been linked to nasopharyngeal carcinoma. To date, mechanistic explanations for this association have primarily focused on formaldehyde-induced cytotoxicity, regenerative hyperplasia and DNA damage. However, recent studies broaden the potential mechanisms as it is now well established that formaldehyde dehydrogenase, identical to S-nitrosoglutathione reductase, is an important mediator of cGMP-independent nitric oxide signaling pathways. We have previously described mechanisms by which formaldehyde can influence nitrosothiol homeostasis thereby leading to changes in pulmonary physiology. Considering evidences that nitrosothiols govern the Epstein-Barr virus infection cycle, and that the virus is strongly implicated in the etiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, studies are needed to examine the potential for formaldehyde to reactivate the Epstein-Barr virus as well as additively or synergistically interact with the virus to potentiate epithelial cell transformation.

Formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde and nasal cytotoxicity: case study within the context of the 2006 IPCS Human Framework for the Analysis of a cancer mode of action for humans

Formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde cause toxicity to the nasal epithelium of rats and mice upon inhalation. In addition, formaldehyde above certain concentrations induces dose-related increases in nasal tumors in rats and mice, but glutaraldehyde does not. Using the 2006 IPCS human framework for the analysis of cancer mode of action (MOA), an MOA for formaldehyde was formulated and its relevance was tested against the properties of the noncarcinogenic glutaraldehyde. These compounds produce similar patterns of response in histopathology and in genotoxicity tests (although formaldehyde has been much more extensively tested studied). The MOA is based on the induction of sustained cytotoxicity and reparative cell proliferation induced by formaldehyde at concentrations that also induce nasal tumors upon long-term exposure. Data on dose dependency and temporal relationships of key events are consistent with this MOA. While a genotoxic MOA can never be ruled out for a compound that is clearly genotoxic, at least in vitro, the nongenotoxic properties fundamental to the proposed MOA can explain the neoplastic response in the nose and may be more informative than genotoxicity in risk assessment. It is not yet fully explained why glutaraldehyde remains noncarcinogenic upon inhalation, but its greater inherent toxicity may be a key factor. The dual aldehyde functions in glutaraldehyde are likely to produce damage resulting in fewer kinetic possibilities (particularly for proteins involved in differentiation control) and lower potential for repair (nucleic acids) than would be the case for formaldehyde. While there have been few studies of possible glutaraldehyde-associated cancer, the evidence that formaldehyde is a human carcinogen is strong for nasopharyngeal cancers, although less so for sinonasal cancers. This apparent discrepancy could be due in part to the classification of human nasal tumors with tumors of the sinuses, which would receive much less exposure to inhaled formaldehyde. Evaluation of the human relevance of the proposed MOA of formaldehyde in rodents is restricted by human data limitations, although the key events are plausible. It is clear that the human relevance of the formaldehyde MOA in rodents cannot be excluded on either kinetic or dynamic grounds.

Risk assessment of formaldehyde for the general population in Japan

Formaldehyde is used in the production of resins, molding compounds, photographic film, bactericide, and tissue preservative. The purpose of this study was to provide an up-to-date critical review of the information to the toxicological profile of formaldehyde, and to assess the risk of formaldehyde for the general population in Japan. Inhaled formaldehyde is an effective sensory irritant at a dosage of 0.5 ppm in mice. Following inhalation in laboratory animals, more than 6 ppm formaldehyde causes degenerative non-neoplastic effects in mice and monkeys and nasal tumors in rats. It is considered that formaldehyde induces genotoxic effects directly in vitro and secondarily in vivo. Sensory irritation of the eyes and respiratory tract in response to inhalation exposure to formaldehyde has been reported at 0.08 ppm and above in human study. Formaldehyde is carcinogenic at the site of contact as a consequence of epithelial cell regenerative proliferation resulting from cytotoxicity and mutation, based on studies in both animals and humans. Levels of formaldehyde in atmosphere detected in rural, suburban, and urban areas in Japan were 2.5-3.2 ppb from 1998 to 2003. The majority of the population is exposed to atmosphere concentrations of formaldehyde less than those associated with sensory irritation. The reference concentration of formaldehyde in atmosphere for the Japanese general population is recommended to be 0.01 ppm.

Inhaled formaldehyde: exposure estimation, hazard characterization, and exposure-response analysis

Formaldehyde has been assessed as a Priority Substance under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. Probabilistic estimates of exposure of the general population in Canada to formaldehyde in ambient and indoor air are presented. Critical health effects include sensory irritation and the potential to induce tumors in the upper respiratory tract (the nasal region in rodents and potentially the lungs of humans). The majority of the general population is exposed to airborne concentrations of formaldehyde less than those typically associated with sensory irritation (i.e., 0.1 mg/m3). Based primarily upon data derived from laboratory studies, the inhalation of formaldehyde under conditions that induce cytotoxicity and sustained regenerative proliferation within the respiratory tract is considered to present a carcinogenic hazard to humans. At airborne levels for which the prevalence of sensory irritation is minimal (i.e., 0.1 mg/m3), risks of respiratory-tract cancers for the general population estimated on the basis of a biologically motivated case-specific model are exceedingly low. This biologically motivated case-specific model incorporates two-stage clonal expansion and is supported by dosimetry calculations from computational fluid dynamics analyses of formaldehyde flux in various regions of the nose and single-path modeling for the lower respiratory tract. The degree of confidence in the underlying database and uncertainties in estimates of exposure and in characterization of hazard and dose response are delineated.

The use of noncancer endpoints as a basis for establishing a reference concentration for formaldehyde

Published studies involving formaldehyde were selected for quality and relevance for determining whether noncancer endpoints could be used to derive a reference concentration for formaldehyde. Chamber studies provided the highest quality data for determining the presence of eye, nose, or throat irritation at a known level of formaldehyde. Some individuals begin to sense irritation at about 0.5 ppm, 5-20% report eye irritation at 0.5 to 1 ppm, and greater certainty for sensory irritation appears at 1 ppm or greater. These levels of formaldehyde do not appear to impact asthmatics even though these individuals are thought to be more sensitive to irritants. Mild, reversible changes in pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume at 1 s and midexpiratory flow) can occur in sensitized individuals at levels approaching 2 ppm. Studies in the manufacturing setting, while confounded by multiple exposures, provide useful information for setting boundaries for sensory irritation or changes in pulmonary function. Community surveys do not provide the specificity nor sensitivity needed to establish a reference concentration. Histological studies of the nasal mucosa suffer significant methodological and technological shortcomings in addition to issues commonly associated with the design of residential and workplace studies. Based on the review of chamber, community, and workplace studies of human exposures to formaldehyde, it is not possible to identify a specific no observed adverse effect level or lowest observed adverse effect level for formaldehyde. Ranges of exposures associated with acute sensory irritation can be derived and do include sensitive subpopulations. However, given the quality and variability of the data, human studies alone, especially those involving sensory irritation, are not adequate to serve as a reference concentration for estimating risk, or lack thereof, for a lifetime of exposure to formaldehyde. Alternative approaches, such as modeling cellular changes observed in animal studies, may be more useful for quantitative risk assessment of noncancer endpoints and should be used as an adjunct to interpreting human sensory studies.

Malignant neoplasms of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: a series of 256 patients in Mexico City and Monterrey. Is air pollution the missing link?

Air pollution is a serious health problem in major cities in Mexico. The concentrations of monitored criteria pollutants have been above the US National Ambient Air Quality Standards for the last decade. To determine whether the number of primary malignant nasal and paranasal neoplasms has increased, we surveyed 256 such cases admitted to a major adult oncology hospital located in metropolitan Mexico City (MMC) for the period from 1976-1997 and to a tertiary hospital in Monterrey, an industrial city, for the period from 1993-1998. The clinical histories and histopathologic material were reviewed, and a brief clinical summary was written for each case. In the MMC hospital the number of newly diagnosed nasal and paranasal neoplasms per year for the period from 1976-1986 averaged 5.1, whereas for the next 11 years it increased to 12.5. The maximal increase was observed in 1995-1997, with an average of 20.3 new cases per year (P = 0.0006). The predominant neoplasms in these series were non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, adenocarcinoma, Schneiderian carcinoma, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In the Monterrey hospital a 2-fold increase in the numbers of newly diagnosed nasal and paranasal neoplasms was recorded between 1993 and 1998. The predominant MMC neoplasm in this series, namely nasal T-cell/natural killer cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, is potentially Epstein-Barr virus related. Nasal and paranasal malignant neoplasms are generally rare. Environmental causative factors include exposure in industries such as nickel refining, leather, and wood furniture manufacturing. Although epidemiologic studies have not addressed the relationship between outdoor air pollution and sinonasal malignant neoplasms, there is strong evidence for the nasal and paranasal carcinogenic effect of occupational aerosol complex chemical mixtures. General practitioners and ear, nose, and throat physicians working in highly polluted cities should be aware of the clinical presentations of these patients. Identification of this apparent increase in sinonasal malignant neoplasms in two urban Mexican polluted cities warrants further mechanistic and epidemiologic studies.

Nasal allergy and atmospheric pollution

Among the effects that pollution of the air causes on human health, irritation of the exposed mucosa is the earliest and the most obvious one. Pollutants damage the anatomical and functional integrity of the primary airways, in particular they cause alteration of the mucociliary system. The mucosa undergoing continuous aggression by an aerosol loaded with pollutants assumes the characteristics of a tissue with chronic inflammatory processes with dysepithelialised areas that could be an easy entrance for airborne allergens. The loss of integrity of epithelial lining, the interference with the repulsion of extraneous particles trapped in the mucus, the infiltration of the inflammatory cells and lymphocytes called into action by the phlogistic reaction multiply the occasion of meeting between environmental allergens and the immunological system of the host and basically of setting in motion the process of sensitisation. So there is a strict relationship between nasal allergy and pollution, that should not be ignored: allergy is the cause of considerable disturbances interfering with study, work and social activity and can lead to local and distal complications.

Carcinogenic response of the nasal cavity to inhaled chemical mixtures

Nasal cancers occur in experimental animals following chronic exposure to a wide range of inhaled chemicals. Although exposure to several of these chemicals is common in industrial as well as domestic environments, epidemiological studies have not provided convincing evidence that exposure to these chemicals individually is associated with nasal cancer in humans. The reverse seems to be true for inhalation of chemical mixtures. The evidence for nasal carcinogenicity of inhaled chemical mixtures in experimental animals is very limited, while there is ample evidence in humans that occupational exposure to certain chemical mixtures is associated with increased risk of nasal cancer. Examples of such (complex) chemical mixtures are wood dust, textile dust, chromium- and nickel-containing materials and leather dust. It is remarkable that these mixtures are aerosols, suggesting that a 'dusty working environment' may increase nasal cancer risk.

Wood dust and nasal cancer risk. A review of the evidence from North America

In this article, biomedical literature assessing risks of nasal cancer and nonmalignant nasal pathology among woodworkers in North America is reviewed in detail and contrasted with experience from Europe and elsewhere. Exceptionally high rates of nasal adenocarcinoma have occurred among European hardwood furniture workers, but the epidemiologic evidence documents a disparity in findings between North America and Europe. Cohort studies of American wood-dust-exposed groups do not reveal excesses of nasal cancer, and wood-dust associations from US and Canadian case-control studies of nasal cancer tend not to be strong and differ across studies. Quantitative wood-dust exposure data are generally unavailable, but general dose information in European studies suggests that the excess risk of nasal cancer is associated with high levels of exposure. There is also an inconsistent association between wood-dust exposure per se and mucostasis or nasal histologic changes, and the mucostasis/metaplasia/dysplasia route to nasal cancer is still an unverified hypothesis. Considering the totality of evidence on the risk of cancer in exposed workers, it appears that wood-dust-related nasal adenocarcinoma essentially can be eliminated in Europe and its occurrence prevented in the United States if wood-dust exposures do not exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average 5 mg/m3 standard.

Occupational rhinitis--possible mechanisms of pathogenesis

Occupational rhinitis has been a prescribed industrial disease in the UK since 1907. It has only relatively recently received significant attention from otorhinolaryngologists although numerous studies have been performed in the past by occupational and industrial health physicians. At the present time the precise mechanisms of pathogenesis are unclear and would appear to be multiple. Recently interest has arisen because of compensation claims. Diagnosis made on the basis of the clinical history is subject to two problems: firstly, there is difficulty in differentiating between occupational and nonoccupational rhinitis, and secondly, clinical histories can easily be feigned. Physical signs would be a more reliable indicator of occupational damage to the nasal mucosa if they differ from the signs normally found in allergic or vasomotor rhinitis. In a series of 100 shipyard workers dry atrophic nasal mucosa was found in 66 and septal ulceration in two. From their clinical histories 78 individuals complained of nasal obstruction, 28 of epistaxis, 42 of hyposmia, 10 of anosmia and 90 of rhinorrhoea. Possible pathogenesis is described.

Carcinogenic effects of wood dust: review and discussion

Occupational exposure to wood dust (alone or chemically treated) is associated with an increased risk of developing adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity. The specific causative agents, i.e., wood dust alone (natural products), wood dust with additives used in the processing or manufacturing of wood products, and/or physical determinants of wood dust and the associated risk factors, are not known or understood. The strongest association of exposure to wood dust and development of nasal cancer is observed in those occupations where workers are exposed to hard wood dust and chemical additives are not used. The time between first occupational exposure to wood dust and the development of adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity averages 40 years (range 7-70 years). The epidemiological data available are not sufficient to make a definitive assessment between wood dust exposure and increased risk for cancer other than nasal cancer. The toxicity, mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity of wood dust to laboratory animals or in vitro with animal or microbial cells have not been thoroughly studied. Thus there is no direct experimental evidence on the potential hazards of wood dust. Data are insufficient or lacking on 1) wood dust exposure levels in ambient air and worker's breathing zone, and the deposition in the nasal cavity; 2) hard vs. soft wood dusts; 3) particle size and shape; 4) chemical composition of wood dust and the extent of contamination with chemical additives; and 5) interaction between inhaled wood dust, chronic irritation, and tobacco smoking. These data are required so that one can understand the association between wood dust exposure and nasal cavity tumors, along with demographic differences in cancer rates, and to develop strategies for intervention and reduction of disease causing agents in order to reduce risk to wood industry workers.

Sinonasal cancer and occupational exposure to formaldehyde and other substances

A case-control study of cancer of the nose and paranasal sinuses was conducted in France to determine whether occupational exposure to formaldehyde was associated with an increased risk of sinonasal cancer. Exposures to 14 other substances or groups of substances were also studied (wood dust, leather dust, textile dust, flour dust, sugar dust, coal/coke dust, nickel compounds, chromium compounds, chromium VI, welding fumes, soldering fumes, cutting oils, paints and lacquers, glues and adhesives). Cases (n = 207) and controls (n = 409) were interviewed to obtain detailed information on job history and other potential risk factors for sinonasal cancer. In addition, a questionnaire specially designed for this study was used to help assess exposures to formaldehyde and other substances of interest. The questionnaires were translated into history of occupational exposure by an expert in industrial hygiene, without knowledge of case-control status. Several exposure variables (lifetime average level, duration, cumulative level) were used to describe the risk related to exposure to formaldehyde. Potential confounding factors (occupational and non-occupational) were examined and adjusted for when necessary. No significant association was found between exposure to formaldehyde and squamous-cell carcinomas of the sinonasal cavities. Because of the strong association between exposure to wood dust and nasal adenocarcinoma, it was not possible to assess an independent effect of formaldehyde on this type of cancer. However, among males exposed to medium or high levels of wood dust, the risk of adenocarcinoma associated with formaldehyde was significantly elevated for the highest exposure categories for average level (OR = 5.3, 95% confidence interval = 1.3-22.2), cumulative level (OR = 6.9, 95% CI = 1.7-28.2) and duration of exposure (OR = 6.9, 95% CI = 1.7-27.8). Although a residual confounding effect of wood dust could not be excluded, this study suggests that exposure to both formaldehyde and wood dust may increase the risk of nasal adenocarcinoma, by comparison with the risk due to wood dust alone. This study also indicated an increased risk among males who had been exposed to glues and adhesives, for all histologic types, which was not explained by a confounding effect of paints and lacquers, wood dust or formaldehyde. No other significant association was observed.

Pollution: the nose and sinuses

The nose and sinuses are constantly exposed to the huge quantities of gases needed to maintain life. Not only is the human nose well-equipped to warm and humidify this inhaled air, but it is also uniquely able to clean much of it. Any material other than physiologic amounts of oxygen, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and water that accompanies the airstream can be considered a pollutant, and this pollutant could potentially injure the individual. The following discussion will review the defense mechanisms that allow the nose and sinuses to protect the lower airways. The effects of pollutants on the respiratory mucosa will then be described, including some recent trends in those effects. These trends include specific population consequences of indoor and outdoor air pollution, and changes in risk for individuals in several occupations. Throughout these discussions, specific areas that would benefit from further research will be mentioned.

Effects of acute exposure to formaldehyde on surface morphology of nasal epithelia in rats

This study investigated the distribution of epithelial cells over the turbinates in the rat nasal cavity and their injury following exposure to formaldehyde. Rats were exposed to either purified air or 10 ppm formaldehyde for a period of 4 h. The noses removed from these rats were decalcified, sectioned midsagittally along the septum to expose the internal turbinates, and processed for examination by scanning electron microscopy. The distribution of the various cell types present was documented in the control rats. Observations obtained from the formaldehyde-exposed rats were compared to those in rats exposed to purified air. Changes were seen in the various regions of the turbinates in the form of ciliary destruction and cell separation (especially in the naso- and moxilloturbinates), cellular swelling (throughout the turbinates), mucus release by the goblet cells (in the nasoturbinate), and in some cases pores on the cell surface or between adjacent cells (evident in the middle meatus). The data from this study indicate that the degree of deleterious effects of formaldehyde on the nasal epithelia of rats is dependent upon cell type and location. Histological studies supported the scanning electron microscopic observations by demonstrating increased goblet cell volume, cell sloughing, and damaged cilia.

Malignant melanomas of the nasal cavity after occupational exposure to formaldehyde

Formaldehyde is a well known nasal carcinogen in rodents, but so far there has been no convincing evidence that workers occupationally exposed to formaldehyde have an increased risk of nasal cancer. In this study three cases of malignant melanoma of the nasal mucosa in persons occupationally exposed to formaldehyde for a long time are presented. The occurrence of such a rare tumour in patients with significant exposure to a known carcinogen warrants further investigation.

Nasal mucosa in workers exposed to formaldehyde: a pilot study

This study evaluates the histological changes, especially the presence of possible precancerous lesions, in the nasal mucosa of workers exposed to formaldehyde. Nasal biopsies of 37 workers occupationally exposed to formaldehyde for more than five years and 37 age matched referents showed a higher degree of metaplastic alterations in the former group. In addition, three cases of epithelial dysplasia were observed among the exposed. These results indicate that formaldehyde may be potentially carcinogenic to man. Combination of this finding with the inconclusive epidemiological studies suggests that formaldehyde is a weak carcinogen and that occupational exposure to formaldehyde alone is insufficient to induce nasal cancer.