Outcome after discontinuation of infliximab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in clinical remission: an observational Danish single center study

Immunomodulators after the discontinuation of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody treatment and relapse in ulcerative colitis: A multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Strategies to reduce relapse using immunomodulators (IMs) after discontinuing anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antibody treatment are controversial in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). In this study, we assessed the association between IMs after discontinuing anti-TNF-α antibody treatment and relapse in patients with UC.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included 257 patients with UC in clinical remission. These patients discontinued anti-TNF-α antibody treatment between June 2010 and March 2019 and were followed up until March 2020. We evaluated the differences in relapse rates between patients with IMs (IM group) and those without IMs (non-IM group) after discontinuing the treatment. Relapse was defined as further undergoing an induction treatment or colectomy. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for confounders were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for relapse. Exploratory analyses were performed to identify other factors that could predict relapse.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up period of 22 months (interquartile range: 10-41), 114 relapses occurred: 42/100 (42.0%) in the IM group and 72/157 (45.9%) in the non-IM group. In the multivariable analysis, IMs were not associated with relapse (HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.64-1.41]). In the exploratory analyses, discontinuation due to side effects (HR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.18-2.82]) and younger age (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-1.00]) predicted relapse.

CONCLUSION

Immunomodulators were not associated with relapse after discontinuing anti-TNF-α antibody treatment in patients with UC. Careful patient follow-up is needed when discontinuing due to side effects or when the patient is of a younger age at the time of discontinuation.

Long-term clinical outcomes after the discontinuation of anti-TNF agents in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

there are concerns regarding the risk of relapse after discontinuation of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the risk of relapse after discontinuation of anti-TNF agent in patients, and the response to retreatment with the same anti-TNF agent.

METHODS

electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Primary outcomes were the pooled percentage of relapses after the withdrawal of anti-TNF agents. Secondary outcomes were the pooled percentage of the response to retreatment with the same anti-TNF agent after relapse.

RESULTS

thirty-seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The overall risk of relapse after discontinuation of anti-TNF agent was 43 % for ulcerative colitis (UC) and 43 % for Crohn's disease (CD). In UC, the relapse rate was 37 % at 1-2 year, and 58 % at 3-5 years. In CD, the relapse rate was 38 % at 1-2 year, 53 % at 3-5 years, and 49 % at more than five years. When clinical remission was the only criterion for stopping anti-TNF agent, the relapse rate was 42 % in UC and 45 % in CD, which decreased to 40 % in UC and 36 % in CD when clinical remission and endoscopic healing were required. Retreatment with the same anti-TNF agent induced remission again in 78 % of UC patients and 76 % of CD patients.

CONCLUSION

our meta-analysis showed that a high proportion of IBD patients will relapse after discontinuation of anti-TNF agent. The response to retreatment with the same anti-TNF agent is generally favorable in patients who relapse.

Relapse rates after withdrawal versus maintaining biologic therapy in IBD patients with prolonged remission

Biologic treatment withdrawal in inflammatory bowel disease patients with prolonged remission may lead to benefits but also increases the risk of getting a relapse. The risk of relapse after biologic withdrawal according to the Dutch STOP-criteria is still unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the cumulative incidence of relapse in inflammatory bowel disease patients that discontinued biologic therapy after applying the STOP-criteria with patients who maintained biologic therapy. We performed a mono-centre, observational, retrospective study by evaluating relapse risk of patients treated with biologic agents who discontinued this treatment according to the STOP-criteria (STOP-group) compared to patients who were in remission for more than 3 years before withdrawal (LATERSTOP-group) and patients who continued their biologic (MAINTAIN-group). The cumulative risk was calculated at 12 and 36 months using the log-rank test to compare Kaplan-Meier curves. Eighty-three of 398 patients that used biologics between 1 January 2010 and 1 January 2020 were included. The cumulative relapse incidences in the STOP-group and the LATERSTOP-group were, respectively, 29% and 42% at 12 months and 47% versus 58% at 36 months. Patients in the MAINTAIN-group showed a lower (p = 0.03) cumulative relapse incidence of 10% at 12 months and 18% at 36 months. Patients who discontinued their biologic therapy according to the STOP-criteria had significantly more relapses at 12 and 36 months than patients who maintained biologic treatment.

Prediction of Relapse After Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Cessation in Crohn's Disease: Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis of 1317 Patients From 14 Studies

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Tools for stratification of relapse risk of Crohn's disease (CD) after anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy cessation are needed. We aimed to validate a previously developed prediction model from the diSconTinuation in CrOhn's disease patients in stable Remission on combined therapy with Immunosuppressants (STORI) trial, and to develop an updated model.

METHODS

Cohort studies were selected that reported on anti-TNF cessation in 30 or more CD patients in remission. Individual participant data were requested for luminal CD patients and anti-TNF treatment duration of 6 months or longer. The discriminative ability (concordance-statistic [C-statistic]) and calibration (agreement between observed and predicted risks) were explored for the STORI model. Next, an updated prognostic model was constructed, with performance assessment by cross-validation.

RESULTS

This individual participant data meta-analysis included 1317 patients from 14 studies in 11 countries. Relapses after anti-TNF cessation occurred in 632 of 1317 patients after a median of 13 months. The pooled 1-year relapse rate was 38%. The STORI prediction model showed poor discriminative ability (C-statistic, 0.51). The updated model reached a moderate discriminative ability (C-statistic, 0.59), and included clinical symptoms at cessation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4), younger age at diagnosis (HR, 1.5 for A1 (age at diagnosis ≤16 years) vs A2 (age at diagnosis 17 - 40 years); 95% CI, 1.11-1.89), no concomitant immunosuppressants (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.18-172), smoking (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.15-1.67), second line anti-TNF (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.01-1.69), upper gastrointestinal tract involvement (HR, 1.3 for L4 vs non-L4; 95% CI, 0.96-1.79), adalimumab (HR, 1.22 vs infliximab; 95% CI, 0.99-1.50), age at cessation (HR, 1.2 per 10 years younger; 95% CI, 1-1.33), C-reactive protein (HR, 1.04 per doubling; 95% CI, 1.00-1.08), and longer disease duration (HR, 1.07 per 5 years; 95% CI, 0.98-1.17). In subanalysis, the discriminative ability of the model improved by adding fecal calprotectin (C-statistic, 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

This updated prediction model showed a reasonable discriminative ability, exceeding the performance of a previously published model. It might be useful to guide clinical decisions on anti-TNF therapy cessation in CD patients after further validation.

Discontinuation of Infliximab Therapy in Patients with Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND: Whether infliximab therapy can be successfully discontinued after patients with Crohn’s disease have attained sustained, clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study of infliximab in patients with Crohn’s disease who were in clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission after standard infliximab maintenance therapy for at least 1 year. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to continue infliximab therapy or to receive matching placebo for 48 weeks. The primary end point was time to relapse. RESULTS: This study randomly assigned 115 patients to either the infliximab-continuation group or to the infliximab-discontinuation group. No relapses were observed among the 59 patients continuing infliximab, whereas 23 of 56 patients discontinuing infliximab experienced relapse. Time to relapse was significantly shorter among patients who discontinued infliximab than among those who continued infliximab (hazard ratio, 0.080; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.035 to 0.186; P<0.001). At the end of the trial at week 48, relapse-free survival was 100% in the infliximab-continuation group and 51% in the infliximab-discontinuation group. The key secondary end point, time to loss of remission, was significantly shorter among patients discontinuing infliximab therapy than those continuing infliximab (hazard ratio, 0.025; 95% CI, 0.003 to 0.187; P<0.001). No unexpected adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of infliximab for patients with Crohn’s disease receiving long-term infliximab therapy and in clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission leads to a considerable risk of relapse. (Funded by the Nordic Trial Alliance [NordForsk], the Medical Fund of the Danish Regions [Regionernes Medicin og Behandlingspulje], the Danish Colitis-Crohn Association, and the A.P. Moller Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01817426; EudraCT number, 2012-002702-51.)

Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Withdrawal in Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Endoscopic and Histologic Remission

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate outcomes of anti-TNF-alpha (ATA) withdrawal in selected pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease who achieved clinical remission and mucosal and histological healing (MH and HH).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on children and adolescents affected by Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) who were followed up at 2 tertiary referral centers from 2008 through 2018. The main outcome measure was clinical relapse rates after ATA withdrawal.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy patients received scheduled ATA treatment; 78 patients with CD and 56 patients with UC underwent endoscopic reassessment. We found that MH was achieved by 32 patients with CD (41%) and 30 patients with UC (53.6%); 26 patients with CD (33.3%) and 22 patients with UC (39.3%) achieved HH. The ATA treatment was suspended in 45 patients, 24 affected by CD and 21 by UC, who all achieved concurrently complete MH (Simplified Endoscopic Score for CD, 0; Mayo score, 0, respectively) and HH. All the patients who suspended ATA shifted to an immunomodulatory agent or mesalazine. In contrast, 17 patients, 8 with CD and 9 with UC, continued ATA because of growth needs, the persistence of slight endoscopic lesions, and/or microscopic inflammation. Thirteen out of 24 patients with CD who suspended ATA experienced disease relapse after a median follow-up time of 29 months, whereas no recurrence was observed among the 9 patients with CD who continued treatment (P = 0.05). Among the patients with UC, there were no significant differences in relapse-free survival among those who discontinued ATA and those who did not suspend treatment (P = 0.718).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the application of rigid selection criteria, ATA cessation remains inadvisable in CD. In contrast, in UC, the concurrent achievement of MH and HH may represent promising selection criteria to identify patients in whom treatment withdrawal is feasible.

Efficacy and tolerability of infliximab retreatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:

A large proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) relapse after drug discontinuation despite achieving a stable state of infliximab-induced clinical remission. Resuming the use of the same tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors in patients who relapse following TNF-α inhibitor discontinuation was suggested as a treatment strategy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab retreatment in patients with IBD.

Methods:

A systematic literature search to shortlist relevant studies was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and SCOPUS databases for studies published from inception to August 2020.

Results:

Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled clinical remission rate of infliximab retreatment in patients with IBD was 85% (95% confidence interval (CI), 81–89%) for induction treatment and 73% (95% CI, 66–80%) for maintenance treatment. A clinical remission rate following infliximab reintroduction was achieved in a greater proportion of patients with Crohn’s disease (87%; 95% CI, 83–91%) than in those with ulcerative colitis (78%; 95% CI, 61–91%) for induction treatment, but the difference was not statistically significant. Infusion-related reactions after infliximab retreatment occurred in 9% of patients with IBD (95% CI, 3–16%).

Conclusion:

Infliximab retreatment showed high clinical remission rates with tolerable infusion-related reactions in patients with IBD who achieved remission with initial infliximab treatment but relapsed after its discontinuation. We suggest infliximab as a viable alternative in patients with IBD who previously responded well to infliximab treatment.

Stopping Anti-TNF in CD Remitters: Cons

Crohn’s disease may cause a life-long disease burden in many aspects due to its progressive nature. A large proportion of refractory patients have been benefiting from scheduled maintenance anti-TNF treatment; therefore, strategy to stop anti-TNF agents in Crohn’s disease is not widely conducted. There have been observational studies demonstrating that approximately half of the patients relapse within a year after discontinuation. Several factors have been suggested as potential predictors for relapse; however, a consensus has not been reached so far. Although most relapse can be rescued by the re-treatment with the same anti-TNF agent, a proportion of patients may result in progressive bowel damage and the need for surgery. Therefore, an attempt to stop anti-TNF is not recommended without careful discussion, even if they are in long-term remission.

Withdrawal of Combination Immunotherapy in Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease-An International Survey of Practice

OBJECTIVES

To assess current practices around the use of combination immunosuppression in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) with a focus on the subsequent withdrawal process.

METHODS

A web-based, 43-question survey.

RESULTS

Surveys were completed by 70 paediatric gastroenterologists (PGs) from 27 nations across Europe, North America, Oceania and Asia from 62 centres covering approximately 15,000 PIBD patients (median of 200 patients [interquartile range (IQR) 130-300] per centre). Routine use of co-immunosuppression was significantly higher with infliximab (IFX) versus adalimumab (ADL) ([61/70, 87.1%] compared with [23/70, 32.9%]; P < 0.01). Thiopurines (azathioprine [AZA] or 6-mercaptopurine) were the preferred option overall for co-immunosuppression. They were favoured with either IFX or ADL (76% and 77%, respectively) and in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) (84% and 69%) compared with methotrexate (MTX).Immunomodulators were the preferred choice as the initial drug to be withdrawn from the combination therapy rather than anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFα) therapy (59/67, 88% [P < 0.01]). The most common withdrawal time was after 6-12 months, with this decision usually based on clinical assessment rather than a scheduled withdrawal time (51/67, 76% vs 16/67, 24%). Indicators of mucosal healing and therapeutic drug monitoring results tended to be the most important "clinical factors" in the withdrawal decision (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Most PG's favour initial withdrawal of immunomodulator (usually thiopurines) rather than biologic therapy in the step-down process, usually after 6-12 months based on sustained clinical remission. This survey precedes an in-depth, multicentre study of clinical outcomes of withdrawal of co-immunosuppression in PIBD.

Clinical outcome after anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy discontinuation in 1000 patients with inflammatory bowel disease: the EVODIS long-term study

BACKGROUND

The long-term outcome of patients after antitumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) discontinuation is not well known.

AIMS

To assess the risk of relapse in the long-term after anti-TNF discontinuation.

METHODS

This was an extension of the evolution after anti-TNF discontinuation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (EVODIS) study (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis patients treated with anti-TNFs in whom these drugs were withdrawn after achieving clinical remission) based in the same cohort of patients whose outcome was updated. Clinical remission was defined as a Harvey-Bradshaw index ≤4 points in Crohn's disease, a partial Mayo score ≤2 in ulcerative colitis and the absence of fistula drainage despite gentle finger compression in perianal disease.

RESULTS

This was an observational, retrospective, multicenter study. A total of 1055 patients were included. The median follow-up time was 34 months. The incidence rate of relapse was 12% per patient-year (95% confidence interval [CI] = 11-14). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 50% (95% CI = 47-53): 19% at one year, 31% at 2 years, 38% at 3 years, 44% at 4 years and 48% at 5 years of follow-up. Of the 60% patients retreated with the same anti-TNF after relapse, 73% regained remission. Of the 75 patients who did not respond, 48% achieved remission with other therapies. Of the 190 patients who started other therapies after relapse, 62% achieved remission with the new treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of patients who discontinued the anti-TNF remained in remission. In case of relapse, retreatment with the same anti-TNF was usually effective. Approximately half of the patients who did not respond after retreatment achieved remission with other therapies.

Discontinuation of infliximab in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission (HAYABUSA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents are the mainstay of long-term treatment for refractory ulcerative colitis. However, long-term use of anti-TNF therapy might lead to an increased risk of malignancy or infection. To date, no randomised controlled trial has evaluated whether anti-TNF agents can be safely discontinued in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission. We therefore aimed to compare outcomes in these patients who continued infliximab with those who discontinued infliximab.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial at 24 specialist centres in Japan. We enrolled patients with ulcerative colitis who were in remission, had been treated with intravenous infliximab (5 mg/kg) every 8 weeks, and had started infliximab at least 14 weeks before study enrolment. No restrictions regarding age and comorbidities were used to exclude participation. Patients who were confirmed to be in remission for more than 6 months, to be corticosteroid-free, and to have a Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) of 0 or 1 were centrally randomised. An independent organisation randomly assigned patients (1:1) into either the infliximab-continued group or infliximab-discontinued group, using a computer-generated stratified randomisation procedure. The stratified factors were the use of immunomodulators (yes or no) and MES (0 or 1). Neither patients nor health-care providers were masked to the randomisation. The primary endpoint was the remission rate at week 48 in the full analysis set, which was based on the intention-to-treat principle and excluded participants with no efficacy data after randomisation. This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Center Trials registry, UMIN000012092.

FINDINGS

Between June 16, 2014, and July 28, 2017, 122 patients were eligible for screening and a total of 95 patients were randomly assigned to the infliximab-continued group (n=48) or the infliximab-discontinued group (n=47). 92 patients (n=46 for both groups) were included in the full analysis set. 37 (80·4% [95% CI 66·1-90·6]) of 46 patients in the infliximab-continued group and 25 (54·3% [39·0-69·1]) of 46 patients in the infliximab-discontinued group were in remission at week 48. The between-group difference was 26·1% (95% CI 7·7-44·5; p=0·0076) before adjustment and 27·3% (95% CI 8·0-44·1; p=0·0059) after adjustment for stratification factors. Eight (17%) of 48 patients in the infliximab-continued group and six (13%) of 47 in the infliximab-discontinued group developed adverse events (between-group difference 3·9% [95% CI -10·3 to 18·1]; p=0·59). In the infliximab-continued group, one patient had an infusion reaction and two patients had psoriatic skin lesions. Eight (66·7%, 95% CI 34·9-90·1) of the 12 patients in the infliximab-discontinuation group who were re-treated with infliximab after relapsing were in remission within 8 weeks of re-treatment; none had infusion reactions.

INTERPRETATION

Maintenance of remission was significantly more common in patients who continued infliximab than in those who discontinued. Discontinuing infliximab should therefore be discussed with caution, taking both risk of relapse and efficacy of re-treatment into account.

FUNDING

Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation and the Intractable Disease Project of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.

TRANSLATION

For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Long-term Outcomes after the Discontinuation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Therapy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease under Clinical Remission: A Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease Multicenter Study

Background/Aims

Our study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and risk factors for relapse after anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α cessation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients because they are not well established.

Methods

A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted involving patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) from 10 referral hospitals in Korea who discontinued firstline anti-TNF therapy after achieving clinical remission.

Results

A total of 109 IBD patients (71 CD and 38 UC) with a median follow-up duration of 56 months were analyzed. The cumulative relapse rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 11.3%, 46.7%, and 62.5% for CD patients and 28.9%, 45.3%, and 60.9% for UC patients. Multivariable Cox analysis revealed that discontinuation owing to the clinician's decision was associated with lower risk of relapse (vs patient's preference: hazard ratio [HR], 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.48; p=0.002) and adalimumab use was associated with higher risk of relapse (vs infliximab: HR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.24 to 17.74; p=0.022) in CD patients. Mucosal healing was associated with lower risk of relapse (vs nonmucosal healing: HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.83; p=0.031) in UC patients. Anti-TNF re-induction was provided to 52 patients, and a response was obtained in 50 patients. However, 25 of them discontinued retreatment owing to a loss of response (n=15), the patient's preference (n=6), and other factors (n=4).

Conclusions

More than 60% of IBD patients in remission under anti-TNF therapy relapsed within 5 years of treatment cessation. Anti-TNF re-induction was effective. However, half of the patients discontinued anti-TNF therapy, and 50% of these patients discontinued treatment owing to loss of response.

Combination Immunotherapy Use and Withdrawal in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Review of the Evidence

Evidence-based guidelines have been developed outlining the concomitant use of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) agents and immunomodulators including azathioprine (AZA) and methotrexate (MTX) in both adult and pediatric populations. However, there exists a paucity of data guiding evidence-based strategies for their withdrawal in pediatric patients in sustained remission. This narrative review focuses on the available pediatric evidence on this question in the context of what is known from the larger body of evidence available from adult studies. The objective is to provide clarity and practical guidance around who, what, when, and how to step down pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from combination immunotherapy. Outcomes following withdrawal of either of the two most commonly used anti-TNF therapies [infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA)], or immunomodulator therapies, from a combination regimen are examined. Essentially, a judicious approach must be taken to identify a significant minority of patients who would benefit from treatment rationalization. We conclude that step-down to anti-TNF (rather than immunomodulator) monotherapy after at least 6 months of sustained clinical remission is a viable option for a select group of pediatric patients. This group includes those with good indicators of mucosal healing, low or undetectable anti-TNF trough levels, lack of predictors for severe disease, and no prior escalation of anti-TNF therapy. Transmural healing and specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing are some of the emerging targets and tools that may help facilitate improved outcomes in this process. We also propose a simplified evidence-based schema that may assist in this decision-making process. Further pediatric clinical studies are required to develop the evidence base for decision-making in this area.

De-escalation of medical therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Treatment strategies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) now increasingly target deep remission, yet the resultant more aggressive use of medical therapy is associated with potentially serious adverse events and significant costs. It is, therefore, of vital importance to consider when, how and in whom medical therapy may be safely de-escalated. This issue is of great potential relevance in the current SARS-Cov-2 pandemic. In this review, we first discuss the rationale for drug withdrawal in IBD, before considering the available data on withdrawal of 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA), immunomodulators (IM) and biological therapy in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD). We consider how to identify patients most appropriate for drug withdrawal and outline a potential monitoring strategy for the early detection of relapse following drug withdrawal. We conclude with important future perspectives in this challenging field, and highlight ongoing trials that are likely to shape practice in the years to come.

Effectiveness of Dose De-escalation of Biologic Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

De-escalation of biologic therapy is a commonly encountered clinical scenario. Although biologic discontinuation has been associated with high rates of relapse, the effectiveness of dose de-escalation is unclear. This review was performed to determine the effectiveness of dose de-escalation of biologic therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to October 2019. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies involving dose de-escalation of biologic therapy in adults with inflammatory bowel disease in remission were included. Studies involving biologic discontinuation only and those lacking outcomes after dose de-escalation were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

We identified 1,537 unique citations with 20 eligible studies after full-text review. A total of 995 patients were included from 18 observational studies (4 prospective and 14 retrospective), 1 nonrandomized controlled trial, and 1 subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Seven studies included patients with Crohn's disease, 1 included patients with ulcerative colitis, and 12 included both. Overall, clinical relapse occurred in 0%-54% of patients who dose de-escalated biologic therapy (17 studies). The 1-year rate of clinical relapse ranged from 7% to 50% (6 studies). Eighteen studies were considered at high risk of bias, mostly because of the lack of a control group.

DISCUSSION

Dose de-escalation seems to be associated with high rates of clinical relapse; however, the quality of the evidence was very low. Additional controlled prospective studies are needed to clarify the effectiveness of biologic de-escalation and identify predictors of success.

A User's Guide to De-escalating Immunomodulator and Biologic Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

De-escalation of immunomodulators and biologic agents in inflammatory bowel disease is frequently discussed with patients and must weigh the risk of continued medical therapy with the risk of disease recurrence. Risk factors for disease flare after withdrawal of inflammatory bowel disease medications such as disease activity at de-escalation, disease prognostic features, and prior course of disease have been identified predominately in retrospective studies, allowing for risk stratification of patients. This review evaluates the published literature regarding therapeutic de-escalation and provides a framework for physicians to apply this to clinical practice. Prospective trials are underway and planned, which should provide further insight into this treatment paradigm and better inform patient selection for this strategy.

Relapse rates and predictors for relapse in a real-life cohort of IBD patients after discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy

Objective: We investigated relapse rates after anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) withdrawal in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, response to restart of anti-TNF treatment and predictors for relapse. Methods: IBD patients in remission receiving infliximab or adalimumab treatment for ≥1 year who discontinued treatment were included. Relapse rates and predictors for relapse were studied using survival and Cox regression analysis. Results: In total, 101 patients were included (77 CD, 24 UC). A total of 56 patients (55%) experienced a relapse (CD 38, UC 18) with a median time to relapse of 32 and 18 months in CD and UC, respectively. Of patients that were retreated with the same anti-TNF agent, 84% responded. A trough serum concentration ≥2 µg/ml within 1 year prior to anti-TNF discontinuation was associated with a higher relapse rate in CD patients (HR 2.89; p = .018), which was more evident in patients requiring retreatment with biologicals, bowel-related surgery or experimental medication (HR: 4.18; p = .009). A young age (<17 years) at diagnosis was associated with a higher relapse rate (HR: 2.29; p = .040) and fecal calprotectin levels <25 µg/g with a lower relapse rate in CD patients (HR: 0.34; p = .041). Relapse rates, requiring treatment with biologicals or experimental medication, was lower in UC patients who continued immunosuppressive treatment (HR: 0.26; p = .042). Conclusions: Approximately 55% of patients relapsed after anti-TNF withdrawal with a median time to relapse of 32 and 18 months in CD and UC, respectively. Retreatment with the same anti-TNF was successful in 84% of patients.

Optimized thiopurine therapy before withdrawal of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α in patients with Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVE

Two meta-analyses have found that the risk of relapse in Crohn's disease (CD) was ~40 and 50% 1 and 2 years, respectively, after withdrawal of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα). The aim of this study was to evaluate relapse rates in CD when thiopurine therapy was optimized before anti-TNFα withdrawal.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational study was conducted including patients with CD in remission with optimized thiopurine therapy before anti-TNFα withdrawal. We defined optimized thiopurine therapy as 6-thioguanine levels of at least 150 nmol/mmol haemoglobin (∼300 pmol×10 red blood cells) and clinical/biochemical remission as Harvey-Bradshaw Index of 5 or less and faecal calprotectin of 200 µg/g or less.

RESULTS

We included 33 patients (median age: 31 years, 55% males, and median disease duration: 7 years) followed for a median of 36 months. A total of three (9%) patients relapsed during the first year and six patients (in total 27%) relapsed after 2 years. After 2 years, none of the additional patients relapsed. The disease duration and duration of anti-TNFα treatment and faecal calprotectin levels before inclusion did not predict relapse. Calprotectin levels of at least 180 after 1 year predicted relapse at year 2.

CONCLUSION

This study found that 73% of patients with CD maintained remission (>2 years) when thiopurine therapy was optimized before withdrawal of anti-TNFα. Additional prospective evidence is needed to confirm the findings.

Outcome of continued infliximab therapy in Crohn's disease patients with response but without remission after one year of infliximab - a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of Crohn's disease patients having responded to infliximab but without achieving remission is not well defined. The present study examined if these patients benefit from continued long-term infliximab maintenance therapy.

METHOD

Retrospective cohort study including all patients treated with infliximab for 1 year until the end of 2017 who have had a response but not reached remission on infliximab. Clinical outcomes were defined by the physicians' global evaluation, supported by clinical indices and objective markers of disease activity.

RESULTS

In total, 376 Crohn's disease patients received infliximab. Among these, 76 (20%) were classified as having response but non-remission (RNR) after 1 year of therapy. A great majority (n = 54; 71%) experienced no additional therapeutic benefit after a further year of infliximab maintenance therapy, thus still having RNR. Nineteen patients (25%) obtained remission during continued infliximab, whereas only 4% (n = 3) experienced treatment failure. Although infliximab therapy beyond 2 years (follow-up median 35 months, IQR: 23-55) was accompanied by a higher proportion attaining remission (40%), nearly half (46%) still failed to improve. Among patients who had discontinued infliximab while having RNR (n = 21), half (n = 11) experienced disease flare within five months (median 22 weeks, IQR: 12-31).

CONCLUSION

Most patients (71%) had no additional therapeutic benefit after an additional year of infliximab therapy, and after a median maintenance infliximab treatment period of 3 years, half still failed to improve further. Considering the importance of achieving complete remission, these patients appear to have an unmet medical need.

Anti-TNF Therapy in Crohn's Disease

Crohn’s disease (CD) accounts for a variety of clinical manifestations or phenotypes that stem from chronic inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract. Its worldwide incidence is increasing including younger or childhood-onset of disease. The natural history of Crohn’s disease is characterized by a remitting and relapsing course that progresses to complications and surgery in most patients. The goals of treatment are to achieve clinical and endoscopic remission, to avoid disease progression and minimise surgical resections. Medical treatment usually features antibiotics, corticosteroids, immunomodulators (thiopurines, methotrexate). Anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) therapy was approved for use in Crohn’s disease in 1998, and has changed the paradigm of treatment, leading to improved rates of response and remission in patients. There are significant considerations that need to be borne in mind, when treating patients including immunogenicity, safety profile and duration of treatment.

Stopping Biologics in IBD-What Is the Evidence?

Biologic treatments have revolutionized the way we treat inflammatory bowel disease patients (IBD). Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) antibodies are superior to conventional therapies to achieve sustained remission without steroids and mucosal healing. The objective of IBD treatment has evolved from symptom alleviation to a combination of absence of symptoms and intestinal healing. Nevertheless, biologics are expensive and are associated with an increased risk of infections and possibly skin cancers. Therefore, the duration of these treatments may be questioned, and stopping them may be contemplated by some patients and clinicians, while it is sometimes even imposed by some jurisdictions across the world. In the present paper, I highlight the recent literature about outcomes after biologics withdrawal, patients' profiles associated with these outcomes, monitoring after withdrawal, and results of retreatment. We also introduce the concept of biologic treatment cycles in IBD.

Low Discontinuation Rate of Infliximab Treatment in Steroid-Dependent/Refractory Crohn's Disease Patients

Background

Many patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) are treated with infliximab (IFX). As most of these patients experience a long-lasting therapy, the outcome and withdrawal of IFX treatment are important clinical questions.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we analyzed the treatment outcome in moderate to severe CD patients with a steroid-dependent/refractory disease course started on IFX. Withdrawal of IFX was evaluated in patients with deep remission defined as clinical (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≤4), biochemical (fecal calprotectin [FC] ≤150 μg/g stool) over a period of 2 years, and endoscopic and histological remission before discontinuation of IFX.

Results

After induction with IFX, clinical remission was observed in 45/109 patients (41.3%) and clinical response in 61/109 patients (56.0%). Only 8/109 patients (7.3%) achieved deep remission and therefore could be discontinued from IFX therapy. In 4 of these patients (50%), relapse was observed after discontinuation of IFX treatment. FC decreased in these 8 patients in deep remission from 652 ± 168 μg/g stool (mean ± SE) at baseline to 24.9 ± 8.1 μg/g stool at 14 weeks. When compared to patients in deep remission, FC had decreased significantly less at 14 weeks in patients in clinical remission after induction with IFX (n = 31; 154 ± 55 μg/g stool; p = 0.01), in patients with clinical response after induction achieving clinical remission during the maintenance phase (n = 11; 352 ± 67 μg/g stool; p = 0.004), or in patients with chronic active disease course on maintenance therapy (n = 50; 645 ± 93 μg/g stool; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A low discontinuation rate was observed for steroid-dependent/refractory moderate to severe CD patients with IFX treatment. As FC showed a more or less pronounced decrease depending on the response to the IFX treatment, monitoring of FC may become a noninvasive tool for tailoring biological therapy in CD patients.

Outcomes 7 Years After Infliximab Withdrawal for Patients With Crohn's Disease in Sustained Remission

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Little is known about long-term outcomes of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) after infliximab withdrawal. We aimed to describe the long-term outcomes of patients with CD in clinical remission after infliximab treatment was withdrawn.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from the 115 patients included in the infliximab discontinuation in patients with CD in stable remission on combined therapy with antimetabolites (STORI) study, performed at 20 centers in France and Belgium from March 2006 through December 2009. The STORI cohort was a prospective analysis of risk and factors associated with relapse following withdrawal of maintenance therapy with infliximab, maintained on antimetabolites, while in clinical remission. We collected data from the end of the study until the last available follow-up examination on patient surgeries, new complex perianal lesions (indicating major complications), and need for and outcomes of restarting therapy with infliximab or another biologic agent. The de-escalation strategy was considered to have failed when a major complication or infliximab restart failure occurred.

RESULTS

Of the 115 patients initially included, data from 102 patients (from 19 of the 20 study centers) were included in the final analysis. The median follow-up time was 7 years. Twenty-one percent of the patients did not restart treatment with infliximab or another biologic agent and did not have a major complication 7 years after infliximab withdrawal (95% CI, 13.1-30.3). Among patients who restarted infliximab, treatment failed for 30.1% 6 years after restarting (95% CI, 18.5-42.5). Overall, at 7 years after stopping infliximab therapy, major complications occurred in 18.5% of patients (95% CI, 10.2-26.8) whereas 70.2% of patients had no failure of the de-escalation strategy (95% CI, 60.2-80.1). Factors independently associated with major complications were upper-gastrointestinal location of disease, white blood cell count ≥ 5.0 × 10⁹/L, and hemoglobin level ≤12.5 g/dL at the time of infliximab withdrawal. Patients with at least 2 of these factors had a more than 40% risk of major complication in the 7 years following infliximab withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

In a long-term follow-up of the STORI cohort (7 years) one fifth of the patients did not restart infliximab or another biologic agent and did not develop major complications. Seventy percent of patients had no failure of the de-escalation strategy (no major complication and no failure of infliximab restart).

European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation Topical Review on Treatment Withdrawal ['Exit Strategies'] in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Clinically effective therapies now exist for remission maintenance in both ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]. For each major class of IBD medications [5-aminosalicyclates, immunomodulators, and biologic agents], used alone or in combination, there is a risk of relapse following reduction or cessation of treatment. A consensus expert panel convened by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] reviewed the published literature and agreed a series of consensus practice points. The objective of the expert consensus is to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical practice so that physicians can make informed decisions in partnership with their patients. The likelihood of relapse with stopping each class of IBD medication is reviewed. Factors associated with an altered risk of relapse with withdrawal are evaluated, and strategies to monitor and allow early identification of relapse are considered. In general, patients in clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission are more likely to remain well when treatments are stopped. Reintroduction of the same treatment is usually, but not always, successful. The decision to stop a treatment needs to be individualized, and shared decision making with the patient should take place.

Discontinuation of Biological Treatments in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Concise Pragmatic Review

Despite the proven efficacy of biological drugs for inflammatory bowel disease, these therapies are costly and do carry some risks, providing incentive for exploring strategies to discontinue therapy in patients with prolonged remission. We presently review multiple cohort studies indicating the overall risk of relapse after stopping an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in inflammatory bowel disease patients is roughly 40% at 12 months after therapy cessation. Despite methodological differences across studies, it appears that patients without deep remission (ie, patients with endoscopic or biomarker evidence of inflammation) are at increased risk of relapse after stopping anti-TNF, as are those with high-adequate levels of anti-TNF before stopping. In patients who relapse after anti-TNF cessation, retreatment with the same biological seems to reinduce clinical response in most patients. Immunological reasons responsible for this high success rate for retreatment are elucidated, but resorting to retreatment also implies a small but finite risk of a severe flare leading to surgery, which should be borne in mind. Thus, stopping attempts should probably be reserved for patients with low risk for severe outcome should a relapse occur. Proactive endoscopic monitoring after drug cessation is imperative to reduce these risks. The recently introduced concept of treatment-cycles is discussed, along with a pragmatic algorithm of decision tree for therapy discontinuation in the selected appropriate patients.

Outcomes of limited period of adalimumab treatment in moderate to severe Crohn's disease patients: Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study

Background/Aims

In Taiwan, due to budget limitations, the National Health Insurance only allows for a limited period of biologics use in treating moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). We aimed to access the outcomes of CD patients following a limited period use of biologics, specifically focusing on the relapse rate and remission duration; also the response rate to second use when applicable.

Methods

This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study and we enrolled CD patients who had been treated with adalimumab (ADA) according to the insurance guidelines from 2009 to 2015.

Results

A total of 54 CD patients, with follow-up of more than 6 months after the withdrawal of ADA, were enrolled. The average period of treatment with ADA was 16.7±9.7 months. After discontinuing ADA, 59.3% patients suffered a clinical relapse. In the univariate analysis, the reason for withdrawal was a risk factor for relapse (P=0.042). In the multivariate analysis, current smoker became an important risk factor for relapse (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.2−14.8; P=0.044) and male sex was another risk factor (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1−8.6; P=0.049). For those 48 patients who received a second round of biologics, the clinical response was seen in 60.4%, and 1 anaphylaxis occurred.

Conclusions

Fifty-nine percent of patients experienced a relapse after discontinuing the limited period of ADA treatment, and most of them occurred within 1 year following cessation. Male sex and current smoker were risk factors for relapse. Though 60.4% of the relapse patients responded to ADA again.

Discontinuation of Scheduled Infliximab in Crohn's Patients With Clinical Remission: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Background

It is crucial to determine whether infliximab (IFX) therapy could be safely interrupted in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients with clinical remission. The outcome and risk predictors of relapse after IFX therapy stopped are controversial. The aim was to assess the relapse and predictive factors after IFX discontinuation in CD patients with clinical remission.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of CD patients with clinical remission who discontinued scheduled IFX therapy at Nanfang Hospital were included. The primary outcome was relapse. All patients were followed up for more than 3 months. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters were evaluated for their predictive value of relapse.

Results

After a median follow-up period of 12.2(4.8 - 21.2) months, 55.7% (59/106) patients experienced a relapse. The cumulative relapse rate was 39%, 48% and 61% at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years, respectively. Based on multivariable analysis, CD-related surgery before infusion (P = 0.013, hazard ratio (HR): 2.671, 95% confidential interval (CI): 1.230 - 5.798), step-up therapeutic regimen (P = 0.035, HR: 2.073, 95%CI: 1.054 - 4.080), low albumin (Alb) level at week 0 (P = 0.022, HR: 3.431, 95%CI: 1.196 - 9.846) and high C-reactive protein (CRP) level at week 30 (P = 0.007, HR: 2.643, 95%CI: 1.310 - 5.332) were associated with clinical relapse.

Conclusions

After cessation of scheduled IFX therapy in CD patients with clinical remission, nearly half of the patients experienced a relapse within 1 year. In the event of the presence of certain predictive factors, IFX scheduled therapy should probably be continued.

Long-term outcome of inflammatory bowel disease patients with deep remission after discontinuation of TNFα-blocking agents

BACKGROUND

Little data exist on the long-term prognosis of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) after stopping TNFα-blocking therapy in deep remission. Existing data indicate that approximately 50% of patients on combination therapy who discontinued TNFα-blockers are still in remission 24 months later. The aims of this follow-up analysis were to evaluate the long-term remission rate after cessation of TNFα-blocking therapy, the predicting factors of a relapse and the response to restarting TNFα blockers.

METHODS

The first follow-up data of 51 IBD patients (17 Crohn's disease [CD], 30 ulcerative colitis [UC] and four inflammatory bowel disease type unclassified [IBDU]) in deep remission at the time of cessation of TNFα-blocking therapy have been published earlier. The long-term data was collected retrospectively after the first follow-up year to evaluate the remission rate and risk factors for the relapse after a median of 36 months.

RESULTS

After the first relapse-free year, 14 out of the remaining 34 IBD patients relapsed (41%; 5/12 [42%] CD and 9/22 [41%] UC/IBDU). Univariate analysis indicated no associations with any predictive factors. Re-treatment was effective in 90% (26/29) of patients.

CONCLUSION

Of IBD patients in deep remission at the time of cessation of TNFα-blocking therapy, up to 60% experience a clinical or endoscopic relapse after a median follow-up time of 36 months (95% CI 31-41 months). No individual risk factors predicting relapse could be identified. However, the initial response to a restart of TNFα-blockers seems to be effective and well tolerated.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Infliximab Treatment for Steroid-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis and Related Prognostic Factors: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to analyze the short- and long-term outcomes of infliximab (IFX) treatment to cure steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) and related prognostic factors.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from 125 patients with steroid-refractory UC who received IFX treatment at our center from July 2005 to November 2013. The Lichtiger clinical activity index score was calculated at baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 1 year, and the cumulative non-colectomy rate following IFX administration was estimated. Remission rate prognostic factors and the cumulative colectomy rate prognostic factors were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

Remission rates at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 1 year were 46, 58, and 45%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative non-colectomy rates were 80, 78, and 75%, respectively. Previous treatment with calcineurin inhibitors was a significant prognostic factor for lower remission and cumulative non-colectomy rates, whereas concomitant immunomodulators was a significant prognostic factor for the higher remission rate. Gender (female) was a prognostic factor for higher remission rate at 1 year and higher cumulative non-colectomy rate.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed good short- and long-term outcomes of IFX treatment in patients with steroid-refractory UC. Previous treatment with calcineurin inhibitors was a prognostic factor for poor outcomes of IFX treatment, whereas concomitant immunomodulators and gender (female) were prognostic factors for good outcomes.

Management Strategies to Improve Outcomes of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Strategies for management of inflammatory bowel diseases are shifting from simple control of symptoms toward full control of these diseases (clinical and endoscopic remission), with the final aim of blocking their progression and preventing bowel damage and disability. New goals have been proposed for treatment, such as treat to target and tight control based on therapeutic monitoring and early intervention. For patients who achieve clinical remission, there is often interest in discontinuation of therapy due to safety or economic concerns. We review the evidence supporting these emerging paradigms, the reasons that early effective treatment can alter progression of inflammatory bowel diseases, the importance of examining objective signs of inflammation, and the safety of reducing treatment dosage. We also discuss recent findings regarding personalization of care, including factors that predict patient outcomes and response to therapies, as well as preventative strategies.

Practical Approaches to "Top-Down" Therapies for Crohn's Disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, progressive, and disabling disease that leads in most cases to the development of bowel damage presenting as a fistula, abscess, or stricture. For years, therapy for Crohn's disease has been based on a "step-up" approach, in which anti-TNF agents are administered after the failure of steroids and immunosuppressants. However, recent studies have suggested that early introduction of anti-TNF agents combined with immunosuppressants can modify the natural history of the disease. Patients who could benefit more of this "top-down" strategy would be those at elevated risk of a complicated or severe inflammatory bowel disease or with factors that can predict an aggressive disease course. Therefore, the management of a patient with CD should be personalized, taking into account the patient's specific characteristics and comorbidities, disease activity, site and behavior of the disease, and predictable factors of poor prognosis. A balance between medication and potential adverse effects should be achieved, trying to avoid under or overtreatment, always discussing the different therapeutic options with the patient. The natural history of ulcerative colitis differs from CD and, to date, there is not much scientific evidence on the use of early combined immunosuppression.

Repeated intensified infliximab induction - results from an 11-year prospective study of ulcerative colitis using a novel treatment algorithm

BACKGROUND

Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents play a pivotal role in the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC), and yet, no international consensus on when to discontinue therapy exists.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to study the long-term performance of a treatment algorithm of repeated intensified induction therapy with infliximab (IFX) to remission, followed by discontinuation in patients with UC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with moderate to severe UC were enroled in an open prospective study design. The following algorithm was implemented: (a) intensified induction treatment to remission (Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index score 0-2); (b) discontinuation of IFX; and (c) reinduction treatment if relapse. Mucosal gene expression for TNF was measured with qPCR.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients were included. The median observation time was 47 and 51 months in intention to treat and per protocol. Remission rates of the first three inductions were 95, 93 and 91% per protocol and 83, 56 and 59% by intention to treat. The median time in remission was 40 months per protocol and 34 months by intention to treat. Long-term remission without further anti-TNF treatment during the observation period was obtained for 41%, with a median observation time of 48 months (range: 18-129 months). The median time to relapse was 33 and 11 months with/without normalization of mucosal TNF, respectively. The 5-year success rate for maintaining the effect of IFX in the algorithm was 66%.

CONCLUSION

The treatment algorithm is highly effective for achieving long-term clinical remission in UC. Normalization of mucosal TNF gene expression predicts long-term remission upon discontinuation of IFX.

Evolution After Anti-TNF Discontinuation in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multicenter Long-Term Follow-Up Study

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to assess the risk of relapse after discontinuation of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), to identify the factors associated with relapse, and to evaluate the overcome after retreatment with the same anti-TNF in those who relapsed.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational, multicenter study. IBD patients who had been treated with anti-TNFs and in whom these drugs were discontinued after clinical remission was achieved were included.

RESULTS

A total of 1,055 patients were included. The incidence rate of relapse was 19% and 17% per patient-year in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients, respectively. In both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients in deep remission, the incidence rate of relapse was 19% per patient-year. The treatment with adalimumab vs. infliximab (hazard ratio (HR)=1.29; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.01-1.66), elective discontinuation of anti-TNFs (HR=1.90; 95% CI=1.07-3.37) or discontinuation because of adverse events (HR=2.33; 95% CI=1.27-2.02) vs. a top-down strategy, colonic localization (HR=1.51; 95% CI=1.13-2.02) vs. ileal, and stricturing behavior (HR=1.5; 95% CI=1.09-2.05) vs. inflammatory were associated with a higher risk of relapse in Crohn's disease patients, whereas treatment with immunomodulators after discontinuation (HR=0.67; 95% CI=0.51-0.87) and age (HR=0.98; 95% CI=0.97-0.99) were protective factors. None of the factors were predictive in ulcerative colitis patients. Retreatment of relapse with the same anti-TNF was effective (80% responded) and safe.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence rate of inflammatory bowel disease relapse after anti-TNF discontinuation is relevant. Some predictive factors of relapse after anti-TNF withdrawal have been identified. Retreatment with the same anti-TNF drug was effective and safe.

Bovine lactoferrin and Crohn's disease: a case study

A 22-year-old male suffering from abdominal pain, repeated diarrhea, and weight loss visited the Digestive Disease Department of Nagoya City University Hospital on 19 December 2011. He was hospitalized and diagnosed with Crohn's colitis. His Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was 415. Treatment by granulocyte apheresis, mesalazine, and adalimumab was started. His CDAI was 314 on 30 December and 215 on 5 January. A colonoscopic examination on 19 January showed almost complete remission in the transverse colon and marked remission in the rectum. Mesalazine therapy was stopped on 28 February, and the patient was instructed to self-inject 40 mg of adalimumab every other week. His CDAI was 50 on 10 April, indicating clinical remission. His last self-injection of adalimumab was on 24 April 2012, and he started taking 1 g of bovine lactoferrin (bLF) daily. His CDAI was 35 on 8 January 2013. He continued taking 1 g of bLF daily without any other treatment for Crohn's disease. Laboratory blood tests on 7 September 2015 showed no sign of disease recurrence, and a colonoscopic examination on 23 October 2015 showed almost complete mucosal healing. This case indicates that ingestion of bLF to maintain Crohn's disease in a remissive state should be further explored.

Discontinuation of Infliximab in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Is Associated With Increased Risk of Relapse: A Multinational Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Infliximab is a safe and effective therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC). We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study that included 7 European countries and Israel to examine whether infliximab discontinuation can be considered for patients who achieve sustained remission.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study, collecting medical records from 13 tertiary care referral inflammatory bowel disease centers of all patients with UC treated with infliximab (n = 193). We compared the disease course of patients with at least 12 months of clinical remission who discontinued infliximab (n = 111) with that of patients who continued scheduled treatment (controls, n = 82). We examined the incidence rates of relapse, hospitalization and colectomy, the comparative effectiveness of different therapeutic strategies after discontinuation, and assessed the rates of response, remission, and adverse effects after infliximab re-initiation. Statistical analyses used time-to-event methods.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, 67 patients (34.7%) relapsed during the follow-up period. The incidence rate of relapse was significantly higher after discontinuation (23.3 per 100 person-years) compared with the control group (7.2 per 100 person-years) in univariable analysis (log-rank P < .001; hazard ratio, 3.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.88-6.20) and multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 3.70; 95% confidence interval, 2.02-6.77). Rates of hospitalization and colectomy did not differ between groups. Thiopurines appeared to be the best treatment option after infliximab discontinuation (incidence of relapse: 15.0 per 100 person-years for thiopurines, 27.4 per 100 person-years for thiopurines plus aminosalicylates, and 31.2 per 100 person-years for aminosalicylates alone; log-rank P = .032). Response was regained in 77.1% of patients and remission in 51.4% of patients who re-initiated infliximab. However, 17.1% had infusion reactions and 17.1% reported other adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In a multinational retrospective cohort study of patients with UC in sustained clinical remission, we associated discontinuation of infliximab with an increased risk of relapse. Treatment re-initiation is effective and safe.

Discontinuation of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a prospective observation

BACKGROUND

Discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in remission remains a controversial issue. The aims of our study were to assess the proportion of patients who relapse after cessation of biological treatment, and to identify potential risk factors of disease relapse.

METHODS

Consecutive IBD patients who discontinued anti-TNF therapy in steroid-free clinical and endoscopic remission were prospectively followed. Multiple logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to assess the predictors of disease relapse.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight IBD patients (Crohn's disease, CD 61; ulcerative colitis, UC 17) were included and followed for a median of 30 months (range 7-47). A total of 32 (53%) CD patients and nine (53%) UC patients relapsed by the end of the follow-up with a median time to relapse of 8 months (range 1-25) in CD patients and 14 months (range 4-37) in UC patients, respectively. The cumulative probabilities of maintaining remission at 6, 12, and 24 months were 82%, 59%, and 51% in CD patients, and 77%, 77%, and 64% in UC patients, respectively. Survival of CD patients who were in deep remission (clinical and endoscopic healing; faecal calprotectin <150 mg/kg; CRP ≤5 mg/l) was not better compared with those who did not fulfill these criteria. In multivariate models, only colonic CD protected patients from disease relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of the IBD patients relapsed within 2 years after anti-TNF discontinuation. In CD patients, no difference between those who were or were not in deep remission was found. Colonic localization protected patients from relapse.

Optimizing Treatment with TNF Inhibitors in Inflammatory Bowel Disease by Monitoring Drug Levels and Antidrug Antibodies

BACKGROUND

Biological tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and redefined treatment goals to include mucosal healing. Clinicians are faced with challenges such as inadequate responses, treatment failures, side effects, and high drug costs. The objective is to review optimization of anti-TNF therapy by use of personalized treatment strategies based on circulating drug levels and antidrug antibodies (Abs), i.e. therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Furthermore, to outline TDM-related pitfalls and their prevention.

METHODS

Literature review.

RESULTS

Circulating anti-TNF drug trough level is a marker for the pharmacokinetics (PK) of TNF inhibitors. Because of a number of factors, including antidrug antibodies, PK varies between and within patients across time leading to variable clinical outcomes. Differences in intestinal inflammatory phenotype influencing the pharmacodynamic (PD) responses to TNF inhibitors also affect treatment outcomes. As an alternative to handling anti-TNF-treated patients by empiric strategies, TDM identifies underlying PK and PD-related reasons for treatment failure and aids decision making to secure optimal clinical and economic outcomes. Although promising, evidence does not the support use of TDM to counteract treatment failure in quiescent disease. Use of TDM is challenged by methodological biases, difficulties related to differentiation between PK and PD problems, and temporal biases due to lack of chronology between changes in PK versus symptomatic and objective disease activity manifestations. Biases can be accommodated by knowledgeable interpretation of results obtained by validated assays with clinically established thresholds, and by repeated assessments over time using complimentary techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM-guided anti-TNF therapy at treatment failure has been brought from bench to bedside.

Considerations, challenges and future of anti-TNF therapy in treating inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic disabling conditions. Monoclonal antibody therapy directed against tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF) has revolutionized the care of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

AREAS COVERED

Considerations before starting anti-TNF therapy are highlighted: the best time to start with anti-TNF therapy, either alone or in combination with an immunomodulator, the choice of an anti-TNF agent and the contra-indications to anti-TNF therapy. Primary nonresponse and secondary loss of response are discussed. De-escalating therapy, the role of therapeutic drug monitoring and the use of biosimilars, are handled. Finally, the future directions of anti-TNF therapy are emphasized.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-TNF therapy remains the cornerstone in the treatment of IBD. When initiating long-term therapy, safety and cost issues are of great importance. The therapeutic armamentarium in the treatment of IBD is rapidly growing. Therefore, the challenge is to optimize the use and refine the exact position of anti-TNF therapy in the near future, with personalized medicine as the ultimate goal.

Current approaches for optimizing the benefit of biologic therapy in ulcerative colitis

As biologic-based medication options for ulcerative colitis expand, our understanding of their optimal use in clinical practice is advancing as well. The appropriate use of combination therapy with immunomodulators can reduce the immunogenicity of biologic agents and raise serum drug levels of the biologic. A treat-to-target strategy with objective assessments of disease activity clearly defines the goals of biologic drug treatment. Mucosal healing is an evolving treatment goal and is associated with long-term remission and reduced incidence of colectomy. Furthermore, regular reassessments and therapeutic drug monitoring can allow clinicians to make evidence-based changes in therapy. Biologic drug de-escalation or re-initiation are less well developed topics, but are emerging areas of study. We review the evidence underlying these advances and a modern approach to the use of biologic therapy in ulcerative colitis.

Update on the Medical Management of Crohn's Disease

The medical management of Crohn's disease is a rapidly evolving field with expanding therapeutic drug options and treatment strategies. In addition to corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and anti-tumor necrosis (anti-TNF) agents, a new anti-adhesion medication (vedolizumab) has been approved. Individualized patient-based dosing of immunomodulators and biologic agents is now possible with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). There is a changing paradigm in treatment goals to achieve deeper remission identified by composite clinical and endoscopic endpoints. More aggressive treatment strategies in the postoperative setting have been proposed due to emerging data on medication efficacy in this setting. Management algorithms that stratify CD patients into risk groups to balance treatment benefit against adverse events and costs are being developed to translate research into clinical practice. This review provides an update on these new developments for practicing gastroenterologists.

The Risk of Relapse after Anti-TNF Discontinuation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a meta-analysis of the risk of relapse after discontinuation of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), to evaluate risk factors for relapse, and to assess the response to retreatment with the same anti-TNF.

METHODS

Studies evaluating the incidence of relapse after anti-TNF discontinuation in patients with CD or UC who reached clinical remission with anti-TNFs were included. Bibliographies up to January 2015 were searched. Frequency of relapse after discontinuation of anti-TNF agents was determined; meta-analyses were performed using the inverse-variance method.

RESULTS

We included 27 studies (21 infliximab and 6 infliximab/adalimumab). The overall risk of relapse after discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy was 44% for CD (95% confidence interval (CI) 36-51%; I(2)=79%; 912 patients) and 38% for UC (23-52%; I(2)=82%; 266 patients). In CD, the relapse rate was 38% at 6 months after discontinuation (short term), 40% at 12 months (medium term), and 49% at >25 months (long term). In UC, 28% of patients relapsed at 12 months. In CD, when clinical remission was the only criterion for stopping anti-TNF therapy, the relapse rate after 1 year was 42%, which decreased to 26% when endoscopic remission was also required. Retreatment with the same anti-TNF induced remission again in 80% of cases (68-91%).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of patients with inflammatory bowel disease in remission under anti-TNF treatment relapsed 1 year after discontinuation. This proportion increased to half in the long term. In CD patients, the risk of relapse was lower when the criterion for discontinuation was endoscopic remission and not only clinical remission. Response to retreatment with the same anti-TNF agent was favorable.

[Clinical outcome after discontinuation of infliximab in patients with ulcerative colitis in deep remission]

INTRODUCTION

Infliximab (IFX) is effective in treating ulcerative colitis (UC) and in achieving mucosal healing (MH). Little is known about the role of mucosal healing (MH) in the subsequent evolution of the disease and the consequences of discontinuing treatment.

AIMS

To evaluate the characteristics and evolution of patients with UC treated with IFX who discontinued treatment after disease remission.

METHODS

Observational, prospective study of patients with moderate to severe UC, corticosteroid-resistant/corticosteroid-dependent, naïve to anti-TNF. IFX administration regimen: 5 mg/kg at 0-2-6 weeks and every 8 weeks thereafter until week 54. In patients achieving MH, IFX was discontinued and the patients were followed-up for at least 20 months. Clinical remission (CR): mayo score <2; Clinical response: decrease in mayo score of 3 points; MH: mayo score 0-1; Deep remission: patient with CR and MH.

RESULTS

Of the 21 patients enrolled, 19 completed the study (colectomy, n = 1; non-responder, n = 1). Mean age: 47.8 years. UC: severe (n = 13) and moderate (n = 6); most patients (n = 11) were steroid-resistant; 57.8% received combined treatment with immunosuppressants, and 31.5% intensified treatment. Week 54: 16 patients (84.2%) showed clinical response, 13 (68.4%) showed CR, and 12 (63.2%) deep remission. Of these, 6 (25%) presented a new episode of UC, and in 3 (25%) IFX was restarted within 12 weeks of discontinuation, with all patients responding. Of the total sample, 91.7% remained IFX-free at week 8, and 75% at week 12, with no remission during follow-up. None of the patients required hospitalization or surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Half of patients with deep remission of UC with IFX therapy presented a new episode after treatment discontinuation, and in 25% IFX therapy was restarted.

Mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: Maintain or de-escalate therapy

In the past decade, thanks to the introduction of biologic therapies, a new therapeutic goal, mucosal healing (MH), has been introduced. MH is the expression of an arrest of disease progression, resulting in minor hospitalizations, surgeries, and prolonged clinical remission. MH may be achieved with several therapeutic strategies reaching success rates up to 80% for both, ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Various scoring systems for UC and for the transmural CD, have been proposed to standardize the definition of MH. Several attempts have been undertaken to de-escalate therapy once MH is achieved, thus, reducing the risk of adverse events. In this review, we analysed the available studies regarding the achievement of MH and the subsequent treatment de-escalation according to disease type and administered therapy, together with non-invasive markers proposed as predictors for relapse. The available data are not encouraging since de-escalation after the achievement of MH is followed by a high number of clinical relapses reaching up to 50% within one year. Unclear is also another question, in case of combination therapies, which drug is more appropriate to stop, in order to guarantee a durable remission. Predictors of unfavourable outcome such as disease extension, perianal disease, or early onset disease appear to be inadequate to foresee behaviour of disease. Further studies are warranted to investigate the role of histologic healing for the further course of disease.

Anti-TNF Withdrawal in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The introduction of the anti-tumor necrosis factorα agents (anti-TNFα) in clinical practice has greatly advanced the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The use of these medications results in durable remission in a subset of patients, preventing surgery and hospitalizations. However, there are some concerns about safety and costs associated with their long-term use. Therefore, anti-TNF withdrawal has emerged as an important consideration in clinical practice. Herein our goal was to discuss the available evidence about anti-TNFα discontinuation in IBD that could inform the clinician on the expected rates of relapse, the potential predictors of relapse, as well the response to re-treatment.

Normalization of mucosal tumor necrosis factor-α: A new criterion for discontinuing infliximab therapy in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Biological agents such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) induce remission in ulcerative colitis. There is however no consensus regarding the discontinuation of this treatment.

AIM

The aim of this study is to assess whether clinical parameters and mucosal cytokine mRNAs in healed colonic mucosa can predict long-term remission in ulcerative colitis following discontinuation of infliximab (IFX) therapy.

METHODS

The prospective Tromsø Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Study is based on an intensified induction treatment algorithm with IFX to achieve disease remission. Following clinical and endoscopic remission, IFX treatment was discontinued, and follow-up until relapse was performed. Patients who achieved clinical and endoscopic remission following an induction course of IFX were included. Expression levels of TNF alpha (TNF), interferon gamma (IFNG), interleukin (IL) 6 (IL6), IL17A, IL23, and transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) were quantified by real-time PCR in mucosal biopsies obtained at colonoscopy. Remission was defined as Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) below 3, and an endoscopic sub-score of 0-1. Relapse was defined as UCDAI score >3 and endoscopic sub-score >1. Mucosal cytokine transcript levels from 20 non-IBD patients with a normal colonoscopy served as control group.

RESULTS

Of the 45 patients included, twenty patients (44%) had normalized levels of mucosal TNF expression at the time of mucosal healing, whereas 35 of 42 (83%) had normalized IL17A expression levels, and 31 of 36 (86%) had normalized IFNG expression levels. The median time to relapse was 8months (range 4-12). Normalization of TNF gene expression predicted 20months (1-39) relapse-free survival after withdrawal of IFX compared to 5months (3-7) in the group with elevated TNF expression. Mucosal expression levels of IL17A, IL23, IFNG, TGFB, IL6 did not predict long-term remission (>12months)

CONCLUSION

Normalization of mucosal TNF predicts long-term remission after discontinuation of IFX.

Systematic Review of Effects of Withdrawal of Immunomodulators or Biologic Agents From Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Little is known about the optimal duration of therapy with an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent and/or an immunomodulator for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We performed a systematic search of the literature to identify studies reporting after de-escalation (drug cessation or dose reduction) of anti-TNF agents and/or immunomodulators in patients in remission from IBD. Studies were reviewed according to the type of IBD and drug. Rates of relapse, factors associated with relapse, and response to re-treatment were determined. Our search yielded 6315 unique citations; we analyzed findings from 69 studies (18 on de-escalation [drug cessation or dose reduction] of immunomodulator monotherapy, 8 on immunomodulator de-escalation from combination therapy, and 43 on de-escalation of anti-TNF agents, including 3 during pregnancy) comprising 4672 patients. Stopping immunomodulator monotherapy after a period of remission was associated with high rates of relapse in patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis (approximately 75% of patients experienced a relapse within 5 years after therapy was stopped). Most studies of patients with Crohn's disease who discontinued an immunomodulator after combination therapy found that rates of relapse did not differ from those of patients who continued taking the drug (55%-60% had disease relapse 24 months after they stopped taking the immunomodulator). The only study in patients with ulcerative colitis supported continued immunomodulator use. Approximately 50% of patients who discontinued anti-TNF agents after combination therapy maintained remission 24 months later, but the proportion in remission decreased with time. Markers of disease activity, poor prognostic factors, and complicated or relapsing disease course were associated with future relapse. In conclusion, based on a systematic review, 50% or more of patients with IBD who cease therapy have a disease relapse. Further studies are required to accurately identify subgroups of patients who are good candidates for discontinuation of treatment. The decision to withdraw a drug should be made for each individual based on patient preference, disease markers, consequences of relapse, safety, and cost.

Maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease: should it be indefinite?

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, persistent, and destructive disorder with different forms of clinical behavior and the disease appears to be progressive over the long term. Providing greater levels of mucosal healing and resolution of clinical symptoms may modify the course of CD. This will often necessitate long-term therapy with immunosuppressant or biological therapies. Both these classes of drugs have side-effects and the latter are also very expensive. Identification of a subgroup of patients with a low risk of relapse and validation of the relevant predictors in various cohort studies are the key points to be able to cease immunosuppressant and/or biological therapy in patients with CD in stable remission. The individual parameters 'mucosal healing', 'deep remission', 'fecal calprotectin', and 'C-reactive protein' or various combinations of these parameters seem to be promising tools for predicting successful withdrawal of maintenance therapy.