Prevalence of anti BK virus antibody in Portugal and Norway

Total nephroureterocystectomy and urethrectomy due to urothelial carcinoma associated with the BK polyomavirus infection after kidney transplantation: a case report with literature review

Background

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection after kidney transplantation is an important cause of graft failure among kidney transplant recipient and may cause malignant tumor, although the association between BKPyV infection and malignant tumor has been controversial yet.

Case presentation

We report a case of a 39-year-old-male kidney transplantation (KTx) recipient with urine BKPyV replication who developed a graft pelvic tumor with the positive Simian virus 40 large T antigen (SV40 TAg). The patients received a living-related KTx from his 65-year-old mother. A protocol biopsy at 14 months after KTx showed BKPyV-associated nephropathy. Therefore, the dose of immunosuppressants was reduced, resulting in improved BKPyV viremia, but viruria persisted. About 117 months after KTx, urine cytology showed atypical cells suspicious for malignancy. Cystoscopy revealed a tumor on the neck of the bladder. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TUR-BT) was performed; however, the diagnosis of malignancy was not confirmed at that time. Six months after the TUR-BT, urine cytology showed atypical cells definite for malignancy. Computed tomography and retrograde pyelography showed no evidence of urinary tract tumor and metastasis. Subsequently, total nephroureterocystectomy and urethrectomy were performed. Histological examination of the graft ureter revealed a high-grade urothelial carcinoma, with glandular differentiation, pT1. Immunohistochemically, the tumor showed positivities for SV40 TAg and p53, along with increased Ki67 labeling cells were increased. By contrast, nonneoplastic cells were negative for SV40 TAg. At the time of writing the present manuscript, the patient is free from recurrence or residual tumor and being closely monitored without additional therapy, 32 months after the surgery.

Conclusion

The relationship between BKPyV infection after KTx and bladder carcinogenesis remains to be elucidated. However, when the KTx recipients who continue to have BKPyV infection for a long time are treated, the possibility of risk factors for renourinary carcinoma should always be carefully considered.

Advances in BK Virus Complications in Organ Transplantation and Beyond

Reactivation of BK virus (BKV) remains a dreaded complication in immunosuppressed states. Conventionally, BKV is known as a cause for BKV-associated nephropathy and allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. However, emerging studies have shown its negative impact on native kidney function and patient survival in other transplants and its potential role in diseases such as cancer. Because BKV-associated nephropathy is driven by immunosuppression, reduction in the latter is a convenient standard of care. However, this strategy is risk prone due to the development of donor-specific antibodies affecting long-term allograft survival. Despite its pathogenic role, there is a distinct lack of effective anti-BKV therapeutics. This limitation combined with increased morbidity and health care cost of BKV-associated diseases add to the complexity of BKV management. While summarizing recent advances in the pathogenesis of BKV-associated nephropathy and its reactivation in other organ transplants, this review illustrates the limitations of current and emerging therapeutic options and provides a compelling argument for an effective targeted anti-BKV drug.

BK Virus Nephropathy: Prevalence, Impact and Management Strategies

BK virus reactivation as a result of therapeutic immunosuppression following renal transplant can result in BK polyomavirus nephropathy and renal allograft loss. This is a complex and challenging clinical problem with a range of management options and practices reported in literature. The current standard for early diagnosis and treatment is surveillance by measuring viral DNA in blood using qPCR. Immunosuppression reduction is the cornerstone of effective management but is associated with a risk of acute rejection following treatment.

BK Virus in Kidney Transplant: Current Concepts, Recent Advances, and Future Directions

BK virus nephropathy is a challenging clinical problem in kidney transplant recipients with wide range of surveillance and management practices, based on individual experience. BK virus reactivation in kidney transplant recipients can result in BK virus nephropathy and graft loss. The most effective strategy for early diagnosis and treatment of BK virus nephropathy is regular monitoring for BK virus, currently achieved by quantification of viral DNA in blood by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Immunosuppression reduction remains the mainstay of treatment; however, viral clearance is often followed by acute rejection, likely secondary to a delay between immune reconstitution and viral clearance. Impaired cell-mediated immune response to BK virus has been shown to correlate with progression to BK virus nephropathy, while reconstitution of this response correlates with resolution of nephropathy. There is recent research to support monitoring BK virus-specific cell-mediated immune response as a predictor of disease progression and resolution. In this article, we review the current concepts and recent developments in understanding BK virus-associated disease in the context of kidney transplant and outline areas for future research.

Unusual presentations of BK virus infections in pediatric renal transplant recipients

BKV has emerged as a significant pathogen in the field of transplantation, predominantly causing BKV nephropathy in renal transplant recipients and hemorrhagic cystitis in HSCT recipients. However, case reports describe more diverse complications, and we too present three unusual cases of BKV infections in pediatric renal transplant recipients. First, we describe a case of biopsy-proven renal damage secondary to BKV prior to the onset of viremia, demonstrating that BKV nephropathy can occur without preceding viremia. We also present two renal transplant recipients with persistent BK viruria, one with BKV-associated hemorrhagic cystitis and the other with microscopic hematuria. Therefore, we conclude that BKV manifestations may be more diverse than previously thought and suggest clinical utility in urine BKV qPCR testing in specific transplant recipients.

Pretransplant serologic testing to identify the risk of polyoma BK viremia in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

This study investigated the age-related prevalence of a prior polyoma BKV infection at the time of transplantation and association with subsequent development of BKV viremia. We measured BKV-specific antibody titers in stored serum samples obtained before transplantation in 94 pediatric kidney transplant recipients (in a single-center, retrospective analysis) and 40 matched donors from 1986 to 2007. Titers were categorized as LOW or HIGH serostatus at titers of ≤ 1:2560 and ≥ 1:10 240, respectively. Of these, 36 recipients transplanted since 2002 were prospectively screened for BKV viremia. Seventeen percent of recipients aged 0-6 yr had HIGH BKV serostatus compared with 73% of older recipients (p < 0.002). The prevalence of HIGH donor BKV serostatus was 73%. Five prospectively screened patients (14%) developed early BKV viremia, and an additional 4 (11%) had late onset of BKV viremia. There were three cases (8%) of BKVAN. LOW BKV serostatus was significantly associated with early BKV viremia (p = 0.02). Donor HIGH to recipient LOW (HIGH/LOW) had the highest risk of BKV viremia (4/7; 57%), compared with LOW/LOW (0/3; 0%) and recipient HIGH (1/26; 4%) (p = 0.004). BKV IgG titers are low in young pediatric kidney transplant recipients, and LOW BKV serostatus is associated with an increased risk of early BKV infection post-transplant, particularly in the context of donor with HIGH BKV serostatus.

The BK virus in renal transplant recipients-review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment

The BK virus, a DNA virus from the Polyomavirus group, represents an opportunistic infection of immunosuppressed transplant recipients. Though the virus was discovered approximately 40 years ago, the emergence of BK virus nephropathy since 1995 onwards, with associated high graft loss rates, has revolutionized renal transplantation medicine. Kidney transplant professionals realized that the consequences of over-immunosuppression were as severe as the consequences of under-immunosuppression and we entered the era of immunosuppressive minimization. Despite this recognition, the optimal testing type for BK virus infections and frequency of testing are hotly debated. Similarly, optimal treatment strategies remain sources of intense controversy. The authors review the current strategies of screening, diagnosis, and possible treatment, and also review the amount and quality of evidence in favor or against. Similarities and differences between cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and BV virus, the three major viral infections in kidney transplantation, are highlighted.

Human polyoma viruses and disease with emphasis on clinical BK and JC

Polyoma viruses are ubiquitous infecting many different mammalian species including humans. There are five known human polyoma viruses. JC virus and BK virus are two polyoma viruses identified nearly three decades ago. Recently WU, KI and Merkel cell polyoma viruses have been isolated from humans. The exact role of these three newly discovered viruses in human disease is not known. Most human polyoma disease is caused by BK and JC viruses which are usually acquired in childhood. Approximately 50-80% of humans have seropositivity to these viruses. Clinically apparent diseases in immunocompetent hosts are extremely rare. These viruses remain latent possibly in the lymphoid organs, neuronal tissue, and kidney and under the circumstances of severe immunosuppression both these viruses reactivate. Neurotropic JC virus reaches the brain and causes progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system with a high mortality rate. BK virus is urotheliotropic and its reactivation causes a form of interstitial nephritis, known as BK or polyoma virus associated nephropathy which is associated with high graft loss if not recognized early. There are no known effective antiviral agents for any of the polyoma viruses.

Polyomavirus shedding in the stool of healthy adults

We recently reported the frequent detection of polyomaviruses (BK virus [BKV] or simian virus 40 [SV40]) in 46% of stool samples from hospitalized children. In order to determine if adults exhibit fecal shedding of polyomavirus, single stool specimens from healthy adults were evaluated by PCR. Overall, 20 (18.2%) of 110 specimens were positive for human polyomaviruses: 9 with BKV, 9 with JC virus (JCV), 1 with SV40, and 1 with both JCV and SV40. Among the 94 subjects without immune compromise, 17 (18.1%) were excreting polyomaviruses. This shedding frequency in adults was significantly lower than that observed in children (P < 0.001). These findings support the hypothesis that the gastrointestinal tract may be a site of polyomavirus persistence, and they suggest a fecal-oral route of viral transmission.

Decline in native kidney function in liver transplant recipients is not associated with BK virus infection

BK virus (BKV) infection is an established cause of allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. The relationship between BKV infection and chronic kidney disease (CKD) post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is not well understood. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of BKV infection, its relationship to CKD and renal function loss over time in patients receiving OLT. Prevalence of BK viruria and viremia were studied in 41 post-OLT patients after a mean 6.5 +/- 4.7 years posttransplantation. Renal function was assessed using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated from the yearly serum creatinine levels using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed for detection of BKV DNA in urine and plasma. BK viruria was present in 24.2% of patients, but none of these OLT recipients had detectable BK viremia. Decoy cells in the urine were found in 9.7% patients, although none of these patients had BK viruria. CKD, defined as eGFR <60 mL/minute/1.73 m(2), was found in 83% of OLT recipients. The yearly decline in eGFR was -6.9 +/- 17 and -9.2 +/- 18 mL/minute/year in BK viruria-positive and BK viruria-negative patients, respectively (P = 0.39). There was no relationship between the presence or absence of BK viruria and either current eGFR, yearly decline in eGFR, number and type of immunosuppressive agents, or etiology of liver failure. In OLT recipients, BK viruria is not associated with BK viremia or native kidney dysfunction. It appears that the most probable pathway for the development of BKV nephropathy requires a second hit, such as kidney inflammation, kidney ischemia, or donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen mismatch.

BK virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis in a pediatric lung transplant recipient

BKV was first postulated to be a potential pathogen in 1971 when it was isolated in the urine of a renal transplant recipient. The pathology of BKV is generally confined to the urinary tract. In renal transplant recipients, BKV has been associated with hemorrhagic cystitis, urethral stenosis, and interstitial nephritis. Reports of BKV infection in lung transplant recipients are limited to a few case reports in adult patients. A recent report revealed that up to 32% of adult lung transplant recipients may shed BKV in their urine without symptoms or renal dysfunction. To our knowledge, there are no published reports of pediatric lung transplant recipients with BKV-associated hematuria. We hereby report a case of BKV-induced hemorrhagic cystitis in a pediatric lung transplant recipient.

BK Virus–Associated Nephropathy in Sirolimus-Treated Renal Transplant Patients: Incidence, Course, and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Because the course of polyoma virus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) has not been evaluated in a large cohort of patients receiving sirolimus (SRL)-based regimens, we have herein presented the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of 378 renal transplant recipients treated with SRL-based immunosuppression.

METHODS

This retrospective single center study evaluated 344 kidney alone (KTX) and 34 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantations performed between June 2000 and December 2004.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 43.3 months, six kidney (1.7%) and three kidney-pancreas (9.0%) transplanted patients displayed biopsy-proven PVAN. The mean time to diagnosis after transplantation was 18.2 months (range: 3.5-31.1 months), with a higher incidence among patients exposed (4.23%) versus not exposed to rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG; 0.53%; P=0.019) or SPK (9.0%) versus KTX (1.7%) recipients (odds ratio: 5.43; confidence interval: 1.29-22.8; P=0.038). Despite treatment with cidofovir, reduced immunosuppression and maintenance therapy with no agents other than SRL (C0=10.2+/-2.7 ng/dL) plus modest doses of prednisone (< or =5 mg), five patients (55.5%) experienced renal allograft failure. No rejection episodes were documented during the PVAN treatment and pancreatic function continued to be excellent among the SPK patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with SRL-based immunosuppression showed an incidence at the lower end of the range described with various other contemporaneous immunosuppressive regimens and with other cohorts not undergoing BK virus polymerase chain reaction surveillance. Exposure to rATG and SPK transplantation represented risk factors for the occurrence of PVAN, which showed a pernicious course despite withdrawal of calcineurin antagonists and/or mycophenolate mofetil.

Discovery and epidemiology of the human polyomaviruses BK virus (BKV) and JC virus (JCV)

Although discovered over thirty years ago, many aspects of the epidemiology of BKV and JCV in the general population, such as the source of infectious virus and the mode of transmission, are still unknown. Primary infection with both BKV and JCV is usually asymptomatic, and so age seroprevalence studies have been used to indicate infection. BKV commonly infects young children in all parts of the world, with the exception of a few very isolated communities, adult seroprevalence rates of 65-90% being reached by the age of ten years. In contrast, the pattern of JCV infection appears to vary between populations; in some anti-JCV antibody is acquired early as for BKV, but in others anti-JCV antibody prevalence continues to rise throughout life. This indicates that the two viruses are probably transmitted independently and by different routes. Whilst BKV DNA is found infrequently in the urine of healthy adults, JCV viruria occurs universally, increasing with age, with adult prevalence rates often between 20% and 60%. Four antigenic subtypes have been described for BKV and eight genotypes are currently recognized for JCV. The latter have been used to trace population movements and to reconstruct the population history in various communities.

Prevalence and clinical course of BK virus nephropathy in pancreas after kidney transplant patients

The influence of BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) in pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation is unclear. A retrospective analysis of PAK transplants performed at our center was conducted to determine the impact of BKVN. Among 40 PAK transplants performed using sequential immunosuppression, four patients developed BKVN, as defined by a >20% rise in serum creatinine and BK viremia (BK plasma load >4 log copies/mL), at a median of 19 months following PAK. In all four patients, treatment of BKVN consisted of reduction in tacrolimus, cessation of mycophenolate mofetil, and introduction of leflunomide. With this approach, two patients experienced improvement or stabilization of renal function. The remaining two patients progressed to dialysis dependence despite treatment. Plasma BK load < or =5 log copies/mL was associated with graft preservation. Gender, age, delay between transplants, cumulative Thymoglobulin dose, and type of kidney donor were not associated with BK virus infection. Pancreas graft rejection or dysfunction was not observed with the above immunosuppression modification. Mean amylase and lipase > or =6 months following BKVN treatment remained normal. BKVN is an important cause of kidney allograft loss in PAK patients. Screening and early treatment of BKVN may enable preservation of kidney and pancreas grafts.

Molecular epidemiology characterization of the urinary excretion of polyomavirus in healthy individuals from portugal—a Southern European population

The human polyomaviruses--BKV and JCV--are members of Polyomaviridae family and after primary infections they persist as latent infection especially in the kidneys. BKV reactivation is mainly related to urinary tract diseases and JCV reactivation can induce the disease progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. The aim of our study was to characterize the excretion of polyomaviruses in urine samples of healthy individuals from a Portuguese population. We analyzed 498 DNA samples using PCR-RFLP, the sequence amplified consisted in 176 or 173 bp within the antigen T region. Our results indicate that 23.9% of the samples were positive for JCV, 1.8% positive for BKV and 74.3% of the individuals were negative for both viruses. We observed an increased prevalence of JCV shedding in male individuals in comparison to female (P = 0.026). Furthermore, the shedding of both polyomaviruses was influenced by the age of individuals with a significant increase in individuals with more than 56 years old (P = 0.005). Our results show that the shedding of polyomavirus in urine of healthy individuals is highly variable between genders, is influenced by age and differs from region to region. Further studies are needed to evaluate the prevalence of polyomaviruses in healthy individuals, in order to understand the biological behaviour of these viruses.

Immunity and autoimmunity induced by polyomaviruses: clinical, experimental and theoretical aspects

In this chapter, polyomaviruses will be presented in an immunological context. Principal observations will be discussed to elucidate humoral and cellular immune responses to different species of the polyomaviruses and to individual viral structural and regulatory proteins. The role of immune responses towards the viruses or their proteins in context of protection against polyomavirus induced tumors will be described. One central aspect of this presentation is the ability of polyomaviruses, and particularly large T-antigen, to terminate immunological tolerance to nucleosomes, DNA and histones. Thus, in the present chapter we will focus on clinical, experimental and theoretical aspects of the immunity to polyomaviruses.

Infectious complications in renal transplant recipients

Post-kidney transplant infection is the most common life-threatening complication of long-term immunosuppressive therapy. Optimal immunosuppression, in which a balance is maintained between prevention of rejection and avoidance of infection, is the most challenging aspect of posttransplantation care. The study of infectious complications in immunologically compromised recipients is changing rapidly, particularly in the fields of prophylactic and preemptive strategies, molecular diagnostic methods, and antimicrobial agents. In addition, emerging pathogens such as BK polyomavirus and West Nile flavivirus infections and the introduction of newer immunosuppressive agents that constantly change the risk profiles for opportunistic infections has added layers of complexity to this burgeoning field. Although remarkable progress has been made in these disciplines, comprehensive understanding of the clinical manifestations of infections remains limited, and the standardization of prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment of most infections is yet inadequately defined. The long-term goal for optimal care of transplant recipients, with respect to infection, is the prevention and/or early recognition and treatment of infections while avoiding drug-related toxicities.

BK virus nephritis after renal transplantation

BK viremia and nephritis are increasing problems in renal transplant recipients. The exact cause of the increasing prevalence of this condition remains poorly understood. Increasing prevalence has been correlated with newer immunosuppressive agents and the decline in acute rejection rates in recent years. The clinical manifestation varies from the asymptomatic state of viremia and nephritis to clinical renal dysfunction. The diagnosis of this infection is based on the combination of the presence of urinary decoy cells, virus in the urine/blood, and typical renal histological findings of interstitial nephritis. Routine post-transplant screening for BK viremia and viruria prior to the occurrence of nephritis and the reduction in immunosuppressive therapy for subjects with viremia appear to be attractive approaches. The treatment of BKV nephritis (BKVN) consists of reduction in immunosuppressive therapy and antiviral therapy with cidofovir or leflunomide or a combination of both. Approximately 30-60% of subjects with BKVN experienced irreversible graft failure. However, in recent years, the combinations of early detection, prompt diagnosis, and appropriate reduction in immunosuppressive therapy have been associated with better outcome. The pathogenesis of BK virus infection in renal transplant recipients needs to be explored. The source of BKV infection (donor as opposed to recipient), the role of host humoral, and cellular immunity to BKV, and the role of alloimmune activation in renal graft to the occurrence of nephritis are discussed in this review.

BK viral infection in an Australian pediatric renal transplant population

BK virus (BKV) is recognized as a significant cause of renal allograft dysfunction in adults, and there is growing awareness of its importance in the pediatric population. Eighteen pediatric renal transplant recipients and 18 age-matched controls were prospectively studied. Anti-BKV immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM titres were assayed in all subjects at entry to the study. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for BKV DNA was performed on urine and serum at entry, and prospectively tested again at 4, 8 and 12 months. Mean age +/- s.d. of transplant recipients and controls was 14.6 +/- 3.3 and 13.9 +/- 0.33 yr respectively [not significant (NS)]. Transplant patients were studied at a mean time of 5.6 +/- 4.2 yr post-transplant. 56% of transplant patients and 39% of controls were seropositive (+ve BKV IgG) (NS). Plasma BKV PCR was positive in one transplant patient (who also had positive urine PCR) and in none of the controls. The prevalence of positive urine PCR in transplant patients was greater than in controls (33% vs. 0%, p = 0.02). Positive urine BKV PCR was more commonly found in patients treated with mycophenolate than azathioprine (p = 0.04). We conclude that the prevalence of BKV seropositivity and viral activation in this Australian pediatric renal transplant population is similar to that reported in adult and pediatric populations in other countries. BK viruria was more common in children with greater immunosuppression, suggesting that this group is at higher risk of BKV induced nephropathy.

Population-based study of antibody to the human polyomaviruses BKV and JCV and the simian polyomavirus SV40

Molecular studies suggest that the simian polyomavirus SV40 is present in the human population, possibly introduced in contaminated polio vaccine. However, no recent seroepidemiological data exist in England on SV40 or on the two human polyomaviruses, BKV and JCV. A comparative age seroprevalence study was undertaken on 2,435 residual sera from 1991 by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) for BKV and JCV, and virus neutralisation for SV40. The overall rates of seropositivity for BKV and JCV were 81% and 35%, respectively, and each was significantly related to age (P < 0.001). BKV seroprevalence reached 91% at 5-9 years of age, but JCV seroprevalence reached only 50% by age 60-69 years. There was a highly significant association between BKV antibody titre and age (P < 0.001), titres decreasing linearly at a rate of 8.7% per 10 years (95% CI = 7.4-10% drop). Significantly more males than females had antibody to JCV (P = 0.013). In individuals under 40 years of age there was a significant negative association between the presence of antibody to BKV and JCV (P < 0.001). By contrast, the antibody prevalence to SV40 remained at 1.3-5% throughout all age groups and titres were low. There was a significant positive association between the presence of antibody to SV40 and antibody to both BKV (P < 0.001) and JCV (P = 0.009), and also to the geometric mean titre (GMT) of BKV antibody (P = 0.011). The results indicate that BKV and JCV are transmitted by different routes. There is no serological evidence that SV40 entered the human population during the past 80 years, and the possibility of cross-reaction with BKV or JCV antibody must be considered.

BK virus-associated renal problems--clinical implications

BK virus (BKV), a human polyomavirus, infects most of the human population, but clinically relevant infections are usually limited to individuals who are immunosuppressed. After primary infection, BKV remains latent in the kidneys and can be reactivated in immune deficiency conditions, including transplantation. As primary infection occurs in childhood, BKV may be particularly important in the pediatric transplant population. BKV is associated with tubulointerstitial nephritis and ureteric stenosis in renal transplant recipients and hemorrhagic cystitis in bone marrow transplant recipients. There are increasing reports of BKV causing nephropathy and cystitis in non-renal solid organ transplant recipients and other immunodeficiency diseases. This might be related to the use of more potent immunosuppressive regimens or increasing awareness of BKV as an important pathogen. Diagnosis of BKV disease is by biopsy. Histopathological changes in renal biopsy specimens may mimic rejection or drug toxicity, but BKV nuclear inclusions can be seen. Treatment is by reduction of immunosuppression. Antiviral agents such as cidofovir are showing promise. BKV DNA polymerase chain reaction in blood or biopsy may be helpful in monitoring therapy. The impact of BKV disease in children is not well understood and prospective studies are needed to elucidate this further. This article reviews the current understanding of BKV-associated renal problems.

Human polyomavirus DNA is not detected in Guthrie cards (dried blood spots) from children who developed acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological evidence has suggested that some childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) may be initiated in utero and may have an infectious etiology. The human polyomavirus JC virus (JCV) has been discussed as a candidate virus, but its presence has not been demonstrated in leukemia cells from children with ALL. The aim of this study was, therefore, to investigate if prenatal human polyomavirus infection could still indirectly be correlated to the development of childhood ALL.

PROCEDURE

Fifty-four Guthrie cards (stored, dried blood spots filter papers, routinely collected from newborns for different screening analyses), collected at 3-5 days of age, from Swedish children who subsequently developed ALL, as well as from 37 healthy controls, were investigated by nested PCR for the presence of human polyomaviruses JCV and BK virus (BKV).

RESULTS

JCV and BKV DNA were not detected in any of the Guthrie cards from ALL patients or from healthy controls, although all tested samples had amplifiable DNA as confirmed by an HLA DQ PCR.

CONCLUSIONS

JCV or BKV were not found in any of the dried blood spots of children who later developed ALL or in the healthy controls. These findings suggest that it is unlikely that childhood ALL is associated with an in utero infection with JCV or BKV, although it is not possible to exclude an association with an in utero infection that has become latent in the kidneys with very low levels of circulating virus at birth.

[Hemorrhagic cystitis caused by BK and JC polyomavirus in patients treated with bone marrow transplantation: clinical features and urologic management]

INTRODUCTION

Differential diagnosis of hematuria after bone marrow transplantation (B.M.T.) may include polyomavirus (BK and JC)-associated haemorrhagic cystitis. Many reports have implied BK virus as the major pathogen in the development of hemorrhagic cystitis after BMT. BK viruria is also associated with ureteric stenosis in renal allografts recipients. Viral urinary tract infections are uncommon in healthy individuals, but we can find them frequently in patients under immunosuppressive conditions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 123 consecutive B.M.T. recipients in the period from 1995 to 2000, evaluating those with polyomavirus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis. We present patient's characteristics, primary disease, clinical features, diagnosis aspects and treatment of these "hidden hosts of urinary tract".

RESULTS

7 patients (5.7% of B.M.T.) developed BK or JC virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis; 3 men and 4 women; median patient age was 29 years (range 14 to 45 years). Bacterial, mycobacterial and parasitic urine cultivates had negative results in all of them. The clinical course was characterized by a late onset of haemorrhagic cystitis (days +30 to +132 after BMT). All 7 patients developed macroscopic haematuria (duration 3 to 30 days). In 6 cases Graft Versus Host Disease (G.V.H.D.) criteria were found. Ultrasonographic studies revealed diffuse thickening of bladder wall in 5 patients. Hematuria was managed by hyperhydratation, blood transfusions, transurethral catheter and evacuation of blood clots, continuous bladder irrigation, urine alkalinization and antiviral therapy. No other more aggressive measures were required to stop the bleeding. Only 1 case of transient elevated creatinine.

CONCLUSIONS

Polyomavirus-associated haemorrhagic cystitis must be considered in differential diagnosis of hematuria in bone marrow transplantation recipients. Urological management, according with the severity and duration of hematuria, is frequently required.

Human polyoma virus in renal allograft biopsies: morphological findings and correlation with urine cytology

Human polyoma virus (PV) interstitial nephritis occurs in immunosuppressed patients after reactivation of latent virus in renal epithelium. Currently, there is neither general consensus about the incidence of clinically significant PV infection in renal transplants nor conclusive evidence determining its significance in the long-term graft outcome. We evaluated 601 renal transplant biopsy specimens (from 365 patients) by routine light microscopy and immunoperoxidase stains with antibody against SV40 (which cross reacts with PV). We also examined urine samples from 200 patients (100 obtained concurrently with a renal biopsy in patients presenting with acute graft dysfunction and 100 from patients with stable graft function). Electron microscopic evaluation was performed in 50 renal biopsy specimens and in 23% of all urine samples. PV was identified in 1.8% biopsy specimens (1.9% of patients). PV interstitial nephritis showed the typical viral cytopathic changes in tubular epithelial cells associated with marked tubular damage and a disproportionately mild degree of tubulitis. There was no difference in the incidence of PV in the urine of patients with acutely deteriorating versus stable renal function (18% and 19%, respectively); however, urines with large numbers of infected cells (> 10/cytospin) and inflammatory changes in the sediments corresponded invariably to patients with acute allograft dysfunction (8 of 8), and in most cases to biopsy specimens showing PV interstitial nephritis (7 of 8). Based on these findings, urine samples seem to be the most sensitive and cost-effective screening method for PV infection; only urine samples with inflamed sediments and abundant infected cells correlate with clinically significant disease. In these cases, examination of a renal biopsy is indicated. Immunohistochemical stains are useful to confirm the presence of PV but do not increase the sensitivity of diagnosis of PV if this is not already suspected on routine light microscopy. In our material, immunostains were helpful ruling out the presence of PV in a small number of biopsy specimens (2%) that showed markedly reactive tubular cells resembling PV infection. Most patients with PV interstitial nephritis responded to decreased immunosuppression; however, the decay in graft function (based on creatinine slopes) was significantly more rapid in these patients than in matched controls. Evidence of PV infection should be systematically sought in renal biopsy specimens and urine samples from renal allograft recipients.